1 Introduction

Boriding is a thermo-chemical treatment that diffuses boron through the surface of metallic substrates. As boron is an element of relatively small size it diffuses into a variety of metals; including ferrous, non-ferrous and some super alloys (Torun & Celikyurek, 2009; Lou et al, 2009; Dong et al, 2010). Thermal diffusion treatments of boron compounds used to form iron borides typically require process temperatures of 973–1273 K in either gaseous, solid (Yu et al, 2005), salt media (Bindal & Ucisik, 1999), ion implanting (Shrivastava et al, 1996), spark plasma sintering (SPS) (Yu et al, 2002), electrochemical (Kartal et al, 2011), plasma-electrolysis (Bejar & Henríquez, 2009), plasma boriding (Rodríguez et al, 1999) and plasma paste boriding (Gunes et al, 2011; Yoon et al, 1999; Ulker et al, 2011).

In order to decrease the boriding temperature and time, ion implantation boriding (Buijnsters et al, 2003), and plasma-assisted boriding (Khor et al, 2005) have been studied over the past 40 years (Davis et al, 1998; Yan et al, 2002). Although the plasma boriding process has a superior advantage when compared to conventional boriding processes, the gases (B2H6, BCl3) used in plasma boriding, which have expensive, poisonous and explosive characteristics, making it as disadvantageous. The disadvantages in the plasma boriding process can be eliminated through the plasma paste boriding surface process. The fact that the paste used has environmentally friendly boron raw materials and that the gases used are generally hydrogen, argon and nitrogen, which have inert characteristics, make this process advantageous. Yoon et al (1999), who studied plasma paste boriding of AISI 304 steel, reported that using the plasma paste process caused lower activation energy for the formation of the boride layer than that of conventional boriding processes. Gunes et al (2011) carried out plasma paste boriding of AISI 52100, 8620 and 440C steels by using 100% borax paste. This work indicated that a thicker boride layer was formed than when using conventional boriding methods at similar temperatures.

There is scanty literature about the characterization of paste borided steels in a plasma environment. In this study, low alloyed AISI 8620 steel was plasma paste borided. The main objective of this study was to characterize plasma paste borided AISI 8620 steel using B2O3 based pastes. The phase structure, microhardness and diffusion kinetics of the boride layers were investigated using X-ray diffraction (XRD), microhardness tester and Arrhenious equation.

2 Experimental

The substrate material, AISI 8620, essentially contained: 0.19 wt.% C, 0.4 wt.% Cr, 0.7 wt.% Mn, 0.4 wt.% Ni steel. The samples had a cylindrical shape and were 18 mm in diameter and 6 mm in length. AISI 8620 steel samples were ground using 1000 mesh SiC paper and polished with 0.1 alumina suspension to obtain a smooth surface. In this study, B2O3, SiC and B4C powder mixture at various percentages were used as a paste. The removal of the B2O3 paste remaining on the surface of the specimen borided with 100% B2O3 paste is difficult and the process is time-consuming, therefore, SiC and B4C were added to the B2O3 paste. SiC and B4C were also added as catalysts to the B2O3 paste. Figure 1 shows the flow chart of the preparation of boric acid based pastes on the sample steels for plasma paste boronizing. The powder mixtures were accumulated on the steel by dipping from a powder–alcohol suspension. Percentages of paste mixture used in this study are shown in table 1.

Figure 1
figure 1

Flow chart of preparing of B2O3 based pastes on the samples steel for plasma paste boriding.

Table 1 Ratios of paste mixtures used for plasma paste boriding.

The plasma paste boriding treatment was performed in a dc plasma system, which is described in (Gunes et al, 2011). The prepared samples were placed in a vacuum container and container pressure was set to 2 × 10 − 2 mbar of vacuum. The samples were plasma paste borided at 973, 1023 and 1073 K for 2, 5 and 7 h in a gas mixture of 70%H2 - 30%Ar under a constant pressure of 10 mbar. The temperature of the samples was measured using a chromel–alumel thermocouple, placed at the bottom of the treated samples. After the plasma paste boride process, the remains of SiC and B4C paste on each sample was cleaned in an ultrasonic bath with alcohol.

Cross-sections of plasma paste borided steels were prepared metallographically to observe morphological details using a BX60 Olympus microscope. The X-ray diffractograms were obtained using a copper tube source in the conventional bragg-brentano (θ-2θ) technique having symmetric geometry with monochromatized radiation (Cu Kα, λ = 0.15418 nm). The thickness of the layers formed on the steels was measured by an optical micrometer attached to the optical microscope.

The hardness of the boride layers was measured on the cross-sections using the Micro-Vickers indenter (Shimadzu HMV-2) with 50 g loads.

3 Result and discussion

3.1 Surface characterization

Figure 2 illustrates optical microstructures of plasma paste borided steel at 1023 K for 5 h for 100% B2O3, 70% B2O3 + 30% SiC, 70% B2O3 + 30% B4C, 30% B2O3 + 70% SiC, 30% B2O3 + 70% B4C paste mixture. The morphology of borides formed on the surface of the substrate has a columnar nature.

Figure 2
figure 2

Optical cross-section microstructure of plasma paste borided steel in different % B2O3 paste mixtures for 5 h at 1023 K, a) 100 B2O3, b) 70 B2O3 + 30 SiC, c) 70 B2O3 + 30 B4C, d) 30 B2O3 + 70 SiC, e) 30 B2O3 + 70 B4C.

At the end of the plasma paste boriding treatment, boride layer thicknesses between 6 and 66 μm were obtained depending on boriding temperature and time. While the highest boron layer thickness was obtained for 100% B2O3, the lowest boron layer was obtained for 70% B2O3 + 30% B4C paste mixture.

Yoon et al (1999) reported that using the plasma paste boriding method for stainless steel, a thick boride layer with a flat structure could be obtained in a shorter time and at a lower temperature than that obtained using conventional thermal diffusion, electrochemical, plasma-electrolysis and, spark plasma sintering (SPS) boriding (Yu et al, 2002; Kartal et al, 2011; Bejar & Henríquez, 2009; Gunes et al, 2011; Bartsch & Leonhardt, 1999). Boriding processes at lower temperatures (973, 1023 and 1073 K) and in shorter time (2 h) can be performed by plasma paste boriding. This can be associated with plasma reducing the pollution of the environment (Nam et al, 1998) and the activation energy required for the compound formation (Yoon et al, 1999).

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of paste borided steel by plasma at various temperatures and times are given in figure 3. As seen in figure 3, for plasma paste borided steel, while an increase was observed in the FeB phase due to the plasma paste boriding temperature increase, a decrease occurred in the Fe2B phase. The boride layers mainly consist of intermetallic phases (FeB and Fe2B) as a result of diffusion of boron atoms from boriding compound to metallic lattice with respect to the holding time. The properties of these boride layers are known to a large extent by the help of these phases (Efe et al, 2008; Kayali et al, 2012). In the samples plasma paste borided with SiC added to B2O3 paste, the intensity of the Fe2B phase was established to be slightly more dominant than the intensity of the FeB phase in figure 3. In the samples plasma paste borided with B4C added to the B2O3 paste, the increase of the amount of B4C also increased the phase intensity of FeB at the X-ray diffraction patterns in figure 3. During the once-through boriding process, when the boron concentration in the boriding media mixture (B4C & SiC) depletes to a certain point, the chemical driving force is not high enough to incorporate the boron atoms into the FeB lattice, resulting in the consumption of the FeB phase to form the Fe2B phase (Chen et al, 2008).

Figure 3
figure 3

XRD patterns of the steel that was plasma paste borided for 5 h boronizing time and in different temperatures with different % B2O3 boron pastes, a) 973 K, b) 1073 K.

When the temperature of plasma is increased to about 1073 K, the B2O3 powders are firstly melted and then atomic boron is (B) formed. Atomic boron was produced through the decomposition of the boron hydride (BxHy) from the paste, and this atomic boron became the active boron, B + 1 within the molten B2O3 or in the glow discharge. Finally, this active boron, B + 1, diffused and reacted with Fe to form the boride layer (Gunes et al, 2011).

The reactions are exothermic and their Gibbs free energies can be calculated by the following formula (1):

$$ \label{eq1} \Delta_\textrm{r} \textrm{G}=\sum\limits_{products} {v\Delta_\textrm{f} \textrm{G}-\sum\limits_{\textrm{reactants}} {v\Delta_\textrm{f} \textrm{G}} } . $$
(1)

During plasma paste boriding, B2O3 reacts with active hydrogen (H + ) in glow discharge and the reaction occurs as follows

$$ \label{eq2} \textrm{B}_2 \textrm{O}_3 +6\textrm{H}^+\to 3\textrm{H}_2 \textrm{O}+\textrm{2B,} $$
(2)
$$ \label{eq3} \textrm{B}_2 \textrm{O}_3 +6\textrm{H}^+\buildrel {\textrm{SiC}} \over \longrightarrow 3\textrm{H}_2 \textrm{O+2B,} $$
(3)
$$ \label{eq4} {\textrm{B}_2 \textrm{O}_3 +6\textrm{H}^+\buildrel {\textrm{B}_4 \textrm{C}} \over \longrightarrow 3\textrm{H}_2 \textrm{O}+\textrm{2B}} , $$
(4)
$$ {{\Delta \textrm{G}_\textrm{B} =-12.994\;\textrm{kcal}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Delta \textrm{G}_\textrm{B} =-12.994\;\textrm{kcal}} {\textrm{mol}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\textrm{mol}}} , $$
$$ \label{eq5} \textrm{xB}+\textrm{yH}^++\textrm{e}^-\to \textrm{BxHy}\left( {\textrm{Boron}\,\textrm{hyride}} \right), $$
(5)
$$ \label{eq6} {\textrm{BxHy}\to \textrm{xB}+y} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\textrm{BxHy}\to \textrm{xB}+y} {2\textrm{H}_2 }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {2\textrm{H}_2 }, $$
(6)
$$ \label{eq7} {\textrm{B}^{+1}+2\textrm{Fe}\to \textrm{Fe}_2 \textrm{B}}, $$
(7)
$$ {{\Delta \textrm{G}_{\textrm{Fe}_2 \textrm{B}} =-16.24\;\textrm{kcal}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Delta \textrm{G}_{\textrm{Fe}_2 \textrm{B}} =-16.24\;\textrm{kcal}} {\textrm{mol}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\textrm{mol}}} , $$
$$ \label{eq8} {\textrm{Fe}_2 \textrm{B}+\textrm{B}^{+1}\to 2\textrm{FeB}}, $$
(8)
$$ {{\Delta \textrm{G}_{\textrm{FeB}} =9.124\;\textrm{kcal}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\Delta \textrm{G}_{\textrm{FeB}} =9.124\;\textrm{kcal}} {\textrm{mol}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\textrm{mol}}} . $$

All the reactions can take place spontaneously and Gibbs free energies are under zero.

3.2 Microhardness

Figure 4 illustrates graphics showing hardness distributions of boride layers from surface to core belonging to AISI 8620 steel plasma paste borided in different B2O3% paste mixtures for 2, 5 and 7 h at 973, 1023 and 1073 K. Surface hardness appears to be high due to the FeB and Fe2B phases formed as a result of the plasma paste boriding treatment. It is known that the FeB phase has higher than hardness values compared with Fe2B phase (Sinha, 1991; Sen et al, 2001).

Figure 4
figure 4

From surface to core hardness distribution of the steel plasma paste borided in different % B2O3 paste mixtures, a) 100 B2O3, b) 70 B2O3 + 30 SiC, c) 70 B2O3 + 30 B4C, d) 30 B2O3 + 70 SiC, e) 30 B2O3 + 70 B4C.

While the lowest hardness obtained was 1583 HV0,05 for 70% B2O3 + 30% SiC boron paste mixture for 2 h at 973 K, the highest hardness was found for 30% B2O3 + 70% B4C paste for 7 h at 1073 K at 1992 HV0,05. Along with the increase in boriding temperature and time (Ozbek et al, 2002; Culha et al, 2008; Sahin et al, 2010), hardness of the boride layer increased due to the FeB phase.

Tabur et al (2009) pack borided AISI 8620 steel at temperatures of 1123, 1173, and 1223 K for 2, 4 and 6 h and they found that the surface hardness of boriding steel was 1650 and 1860 HV0.1 for 2 h at 1123 and 1223 K for 6 h, respectively. The boride layer hardness obtained as a result of the plasma paste boriding process in lower temperatures and in shorter time was found to be higher compared with the hardness values obtained by traditional boriding (Genel et al, 2003; Genel, 2006; Ozbek et al, 2002) methods.

3.3 Kinetics

There is a parabolic relationship between boride layer thickness and boriding time. As can be seen in figure 5, there is a variation of boriding layer thickness with time at different temperatures. The thickness of the boride layer as a function of squared time is described by:

$$ \label{eq9} x^2=K.t, $$
(9)

where x is the depth of the boride layer, K is the growth rate constant, and t is the time. Generally, it is expected that the plot of boride layer thickness versus squared treatment time gives a straight line which indicates that the growth of the layer has a parabolic dependence to time. The values of K were calculated from the slopes of layer thickness versus squared treatment time graphs (figure 6). The relationship between the growth rate constant and the temperature can be expressed by an Arrhenius type equation as

$$ \label{eq10} K=K_0 .\exp \left( {-\frac{Q}{R.T}} \right), $$
(10)

where Q is the activation energy (J/mol); T is the absolute temperature (K) and R is the gas constant (J/mol K). Figure 6 is the plot of growth rate constant of the plasma paste boride layers in different B2O3% mixtures of the steel as a function of temperature. Consequently, the activation energy for the boron diffusion in the boride layer is determined by the slope obtained by the plot of lnK vs. 1/T. Making use of the least squares analysis, the kinetics conclusions are obtained as

$$ \label{eq11} K_{B_2 O_3 } =K_0 .\exp \left( {-\frac{124716}{R.T}} \right), $$
(11)
$$ \label{eq12} K_{70\% B_2 O_3 +30\% SiC} =K_0 .\exp \left( {-\frac{129336}{R.T}} \right), $$
(12)
$$ \label{eq13} K_{70\% B_2 O_3 +30\% B_4 C} =K_0 .\exp \left( {-\frac{138574}{R.T}} \right), $$
(13)
$$ \label{eq14} K_{30\% B_2 O_3 +70\% SiC} =K_0 .\exp \left( {-\frac{126564}{R.T}} \right), $$
(14)
$$ \label{eq15} K_{30\% B_2 O_3 +70\% B_4 C} =K_0 .\exp \left( {-\frac{131183}{R.T}} \right). $$
(15)

for the temperature range of 973 K to 1073 K. Table 2 shows the growth rate constant (K) and activation energy (Q) as a function of boriding temperature and on the samples borided with different B2O3% paste mixture. Together with the increase in temperature from 973 K to 1073 K, an increase occurred in the diffusion coefficient values of boron in the boride layer. Since the diffusion process speeds up along with the increase in temperature, boride layers were obtained. The diffusion coefficient for the samples borided with B2O3 paste with SiC and B4C were observed to have decreased the diffusion coefficient. Lower diffusion coefficient values were established in the B4C addition compared with the SiC addition. B4C did not contribute much since the plasma paste boriding process was conducted in the lower temperatures of 973 and 1023 K. However, with the temperature increased to 1073 K, B4C was found to have contributed to the boriding treatment. While the highest activation energy was observed as 138.574 kJ/mol in 70% B2O3 + 30% B4C paste, the lowest was obtained from 100% B2O3 paste as 124.716 kJ/mol. The addition of B4C and SiC to B2O3 paste increased the activation energy values. Kartal et al (2011) borided low carbon steel by electrochemical boriding. They reported that using the electrochemical boriding process, the activation energy was determined to be 172.75 ± 8.6 kJ/mol. Obviously, a significant decrease (i.e., ≈28%) in Q is feasible with plasma paste boriding methods.

Figure 5
figure 5

Variation of boriding layer thickness with time at different temperatures: a) 100 B2O3, b) 70 B2O3 + 30 SiC, c) 70 B2O3 + 30 B4C, d) 30 B2O3 + 70 SiC, e) 30 B2O3 + 70 B4C.

Figure 6
figure 6

Square of boride layer thickness in different % B2O3 mixtures versus boriding time at various temperatures for AISI 8620 steel: a) 100 B2O3, b) 70 B2O3 + 30 SiC, c) 70 B2O3 + 30 B4C, d) 30 B2O3 + 70 SiC, e) 30 B2O3 + 70 B4C.

Table 2 Growth rate constant (K) and activation energy (Q) as a function of boriding temperature and steel.

Diffusion coefficient values obtained through plasma paste boriding methods were established as higher compared with the traditional boriding methods. At the end of plasma paste boriding, diffusion coefficient values were observed to change in the range of 0,18 × 10 − 10 and 16,07 × 10 − 10. The calculated diffusion coefficient of the present study is in good agreement with values reported in the literature (Oliveria et al 2010; Sen et al 2005a, bb; Taktak 2006).

The kinetics results of the present study are effectively comparable with references (Yu et al 2002; Kartal et al 2011; Genel et al 2003; Sen et al 2005a, b; Taktak 2006; Campos et al 2005; Efe et al 2008; Ozdemir et al 2008) as seen in table 3. Activation energy values obtained through the plasma paste boriding % method were established as lower compared with other boriding methods (Yu et al 2002; Kartal et al 2011; Genel et al 2003; Sen et al 2005a, b; Taktak 2006; Campos et al 2005; Efe et al 2008; Ozdemir et al 2008). Yoon et al (1999) borided AISI 304 steel by plasma paste which consisted of borax (Na2B4O7) and amorphous boron, at different temperatures in Ar/H2 gases and examined the diffusion kinetics and morphology of the layer. They reported that using the plasma paste process caused lower activation energy for the formation of the boride layer than that of conventional boriding processes. The calculated activation energy of the present study is in good agreement with values reported in the literature (Sen et al 2005a, 2005b; Taktak 2006; Campos et al 2005; Efe et al 2008; Ozdemir et al 2008).

Table 3 The comparison of activation energy for diffusion of boron with respect to the different boriding medium and steel.

Figure 7 illustrates lnK-1/T graphics and correlation coefficient values of cementation steel that was plasma paste borided in different B2O3% paste mixture. Correlation coefficients indicate the degree of reliability of the predicted results, when compared with that of the experiments. The closer the values of the correlation coefficients to 1, the more reliable are the calculated results with respect to the experiment. Therefore, utilization of those equations is of importance in predicting process results for practical applications as well as scientific studies (Sen et al 2005a, b).

Figure 7
figure 7

Growth rate constant vs. temperature of % B2O3 paste mixtures of plasma paste borided the steel and correlation coefficients (R2).

4 Conclusions

The AISI 8620 steel was successfully paste borided in 70% H2–30% Ar gas mixture plasma at temperatures of 973, 1023 and 1073 K for 2, 5 and 7 h with various B2O3 paste mixture. It is possible to boride steels using B2O3 based pastes at low temperatures in plasma that activates the chemical reactions. A double phase pattern (FeB + Fe2B) was obtained after plasma paste boriding as a result of X-ray diffraction analysis. While the lowest hardness obtained was 1583 HV0,05 for 70% B2O3 + 30% SiC paste mixture for 2 h at 973 K, the highest hardness found was 1992 HV0,05 for 30% B2O3 + 70% B4C paste for 7 h at 1073 K. Activation energy values obtained through plasma paste boriding with B2O3% paste mixture were established as lower compared with other boriding methods. While the highest activation energy was found as 138.574 kJ/mol in 70% B2O3 + 30% B4C paste, the lowest was obtained as 124.716 kJ/mol in 100% B2O3 paste.