Abstract
Neural stem cells can generate new neurons in the mouse adult brain in a complex multistep process called neurogenesis. Several factors regulate this process, including neurotransmitters, hormones, neurotrophic factors, pharmacological agents, and environmental factors. Purinergic signaling, mainly the adenosinergic system, takes part in neurogenesis, being involved in cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation. However, the role of the purine nucleoside guanosine in neurogenesis remains unclear. Here, we examined the effect of guanosine by using the neurosphere assay derived from neural stem cells of adult mice. We found that continuous treatment with guanosine increased the number of neurospheres, neural stem cell proliferation, and neuronal differentiation. The effect of guanosine to increase the number of neurospheres was reduced by removing adenosine from the culture medium. We next traced the neurogenic effect of guanosine in vivo. The intraperitoneal treatment of adult C57BL/6 mice with guanosine (8 mg/kg) for 26 days increased the number of dividing bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU)-positive cells and also increased neurogenesis, as identified by measuring doublecortin (DCX)-positive cells in the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus. Antidepressant-like behavior in adult mice accompanied the guanosine-induced neurogenesis in the DG. These results provide new evidence of a pro-neurogenic effect of guanosine on neural stem/progenitor cells, and it was associated in vivo with antidepressant-like effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Adult neurogenesis is a form of neuroplasticity generating morphological and functional new neurons from neural stem/progenitor cells (NSCs). Studies on stem cell research have identified a physiological role of adult neurogenesis including learning, memory, and synaptic plasticity [1, 2], and it is implicated in the action of antidepressants [3]. The two major niches where adult NSCs reside are the subventricular zone (SVZ) along the lateral walls of the lateral ventricles and the subgranular zone (SGZ) of the hippocampus. Most adult NSCs are quiescent through inhibition of cell proliferation [4]. After activation, they divide, allowing them to be labeled with 5´-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine (BrdU) and later give rise to the neuroblasts. The proliferating neuroblasts then exit the cell cycle to differentiate into newborn neurons expressing the microtubule-associated protein doublecortin (DCX). In the hippocampus, the neuroblasts from SGZ migrate and differentiate into dentate granule neurons in the inner granule cell layer (GCL) and later integrate into the existing circuitry [5, 6].
The neurogenic niche around NSCs is highly complex and surrounded by astrocytes, endothelial cells, and mature neurons to provide structural support and regulation of the NSCs [7]. Studies have identified a few modulators’ signals [8] including signaling through purinergic receptors [9]. In the adult brain, there is evidence of the presence of membrane-bound ectonucleotidases, which hydrolyzes extracellular nucleotides tri- and/or diphosphates to modulate purinergic signaling [10]. Astrocytes are also a source of extracellular nucleotides to promote NSC proliferation in the adult hippocampus and in vitro [11].
Cell culture of NSCs from SGZ and the SVZ is achieved in the presence of epidermal growth factor (EGF) and fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2), to form free-floating clusters in suspension culture, designated neurospheres. The neural progenitor cells in the neurospheres produce and release adenosine-5′-triphosphate (ATP) locally resulting in the activation of purinergic receptors [12]. Moreover, the exogenous addition of ATP, ADP, and adenosine increase NSC proliferation [12, 13]. The expression of ectonucleotidases and the release of purine nucleotides may activate signaling via purine nucleosides.
Guanosine is a naturally occurring nucleoside with a vital neuromodulatory role in the extracellular environment of brain cells promoting neuroprotection and activation of signaling pathways and increasing the expression of new proteins [14]. Astrocytes release guanosine and other purines in physiological conditions where they may confer neuroprotective effects, as after brain injury [15,16,17,18]. Experimental studies have shown that exogenous guanosine treatment stimulates astrocyte proliferation associated with guanosine-induced adenosine release. Astrocytes treated with guanosine induce a peak of extracellular accumulation of adenosine and inosine, which may be directly released from astrocytes or derived from the extracellular breakdown of ATP [19, 20]. Guanosine treatment also affects SVZ NSC proliferation, through activation of the cAMP-CREB pathway, as demonstrated in NSC culture from postnatal rats [21].
Although guanosine does not have a clearly identified site of interaction in the brain, there is evidence that guanosine modulates the adenosine receptors (A1R and A2AR) to exert its neuroprotective effects [22]. In astrocytes, the protective effects of guanosine against ischemic-like situations are abolished by an A1R antagonist and A2AR agonist [23]. Additionally, the blockade of A2AR inhibits the guanosine-induced increase in the number of cultured cerebellar neurons [24].
Systemic administration of guanosine (8 mg/kg, 2 to 8 weeks of treatment) triggers proliferation and remyelination after chronic spinal cord injury [25] and stimulates neurogenesis associated with improved motor skills [26]. Additionally, guanosine (5 mg/kg) promotes antidepressant-like effects following 21 days of treatment [27].
In this study, we examined the ability of guanosine to stimulate proliferation and differentiation in NSCs from adult mice. The current findings indicated that guanosine induced NSC activation, conversion into progenitor cells, and shifts in the differentiation toward a neuronal fate. In NSCs obtained from the DG, the proliferation effect was associated with the presence of extracellular adenosine. By tracing neurogenesis in vivo, we demonstrated that systemic administration of guanosine in adult mice increased hippocampal neurogenesis that was accompanied by antidepressant-like effects.
Materials and Methods
Animals
Experiments were conducted using adult C57BL/6 mice (male and female, 3 to 4 months) from our inbred colony, housed on a 12/12-h light/dark cycle, room temperature 21 ± 1 °C, with ad libitum access to food and water. The animals were treated, manipulated, and euthanized according to the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” (NIH 2011) and approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (CEUA/UFSC 1454270417). All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.
NSC Cell Culture and Immunocytochemistry
NSCs were isolated from adult mice (male and female, 3 to 4 months) and grown as floating spheres called neurospheres [28, 29]. For cytochemical analysis, neurospheres were seeded as adherent cells in traditional two-dimensional cultures. The DG of hippocampus and SVZ were microdissected and collected in cold Hank’s buffered saline solution (HBSS) containing HEPES and dissociated in 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Gibco #25300062) for SVZ or a mix PDD (papain 2.5 U/ml Sigma #P4762, Dispase 1 U/ml Sigma #D4693, DNaseI 1 U/ml from Sigma #D5025) for DG. After dissociation, we added the trypsin inhibitor and centrifuged the sample at 300 g for 5 min. Cells were washed and resuspended in growth medium consisting of Neurobasal A (Gibco #21103-049), containing B27 (2%, Gibco #17504-044), GlutaMAX (1X, Gibco # 35050-038), Heparin (2 μg/ml, Sigma #H3149), Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Anti-Anti, 50 U/ml, Gibco #15240-062), fibroblast growth factor-2 (bFGF) (20 ng/ml, PrepoTech #100-18B), and epidermal growth factor (EGF) (20 ng/ml, PrepoTech #100-15). Cells were passaged at least twice before use to generate secondary neurospheres.
Secondary neurospheres were dissociated and resuspended in N2 growth medium with N2 supplement (Gibco #17502-408), DMEM/F12 (Gibco #12500-062), L-glutamine (2 mM, Sigma #G8540), antibiotic-antimycotic (50 U/ml, Gibco #15240-062), bFGF (20 ng/ml, PrepoTech #100-18B), and EGF (20 ng/ml, PrepoTech #100-15). Cells were seeded (5 × 104 cells/ml) into uncoated 24-well plates and cultured for 7 (SVZ) to 14 (DG) days in suspension to form neurospheres in the N2 control medium. When cells measured between 50 and 200 mm, they were analyzed by microscopy.
Neurospheres were cultured under additional treatment with guanosine (GUO, 100 μM, Sigma #G6264). This guanosine concentration was previously shown as neuroprotective [22, 24, 30]. In some experiments, we also tested adenosine (ADO, 100 μM, Sigma #A4036), adenosine deaminase (ADA, 0.5 U/ml, Sigma #10102105001), and a mixture of ADA + GUO for their effects on neurospheres.
After imaging, neurospheres were fixed for 20 min with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS). Whole neurospheres immunostaining was performed following free-floating immunohistochemistry protocol [31, 32]. Immunocytochemistry was performed by washing the cells in PBS and permeabilized 5 min with PBS/0.5% Triton X-100. The cells were then blocked in PBS/0.5% Triton X-100 containing 10% normal donkey serum (Sigma #D9663) for 1 h at room temperature. Next, the cells were incubated overnight at 4 °C in PBS/0.3% Triton X-100 containing 5% serum and the appropriate mixture of primary antibodies. Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-Nestin (1:500, Abcam #6142) for neural stem/progenitor cells, rabbit anti-Ki-67 (1:500, Millipore #9260) for cell proliferation, mouse anti-β-tubulin III (1:500, Sigma #T8578) for neurons, and rabbit anti-GFAP (1:600, Sigma #G9269) for astrocytes. After washing in PBS/0.1%, Triton X-100, for 5 min, cells were incubated 1 h with the secondary antibody diluted 1:2000, donkey anti-rabbit IgG labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (Invitrogen #A212006) and donkey anti-mouse IgG Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen #A11005). All samples were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (5 μg/ml, Sigma #B2261), and whole neurospheres were mounted onto cover glass with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen #P10144) and viewed for triple immunofluorescence in a Confocal microscope DMI6000 B (Leica).
Cells plated in monolayer for proliferation assay were seeded with 1 × 105 cells/ml on poly-L-ornithine/laminin-coated glass coverslips in 24-well plates and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 in N2 control medium. For treatment experiments, 100 μM of guanosine was added to the in N2 medium. After cells reach confluency, cells were rinsed with PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed for 20 min with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for immunocytochemistry. Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-Nestin (1:500, Abcam #6142) for neural stem/progenitor cells and rabbit anti-Ki-67 (1:500, Millipore #9260) for cell proliferation. All samples were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 dye to label cell nuclei (5 μg/ml, Sigma #B2261) and mounted onto cover glass with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen #P10144).
To induce differentiation, single neurospheres with similar size were plated on poly-L-ornithine/laminin-coated glass coverslips in 24-well plates and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Cells were allowed to grow for 24 h in the N2 growth medium, and the next day, we withdrew the growth factors, which were replaced by 1% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco #10437010). For treatment experiments, 100 μM of guanosine was added to the medium. After 7 days, cells were rinsed with PBS (pH 7.4) and fixed for 20 min with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS for immunocytochemistry. Primary antibodies used were mouse anti-β-tubulin III (1:500, Sigma #T8578) for neurons and rabbit anti-GFAP (1:600, Sigma #G9269) for astrocytes. All samples were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 dye to label cell nuclei (5 μg/ml, Sigma #B2261) and mounted onto cover glass with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen #P10144).
Imaging and Quantification of Neurospheres and Monolayer Cell Cultures
The micrographs were taken at × 100 total magnification using a microscope Axiovert 40 CFL (Zeiss) equipped with a digital camera Axio-Cam MRc (Zeiss). Five representative images were taken from randomly selected fields (ROI) for each well, and analysis was carried out using Zen software (Zeiss) by manually counting and measuring the diameters of each neurospheres using a circle measurement tool, which provides the diameter (μm). Neurospheres of diameter less than 50 μm were excluded from the count. The results are representative from triplicates of three or four separate experiments (n = 3–4). After micrographs were taken, neurospheres were centrifuged, treated with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA at 37 °C for 5 min, washed, and mechanically dissociated. The cell number was counted using a hemocytometer.
For NSCs plated in monolayer, images were captured in a Confocal microscope DMI6000 B (Leica) at × 60 total magnification. The results are representative from duplicates of three separate experiments (n = 3). Five representative images were taken from randomly selected fields (ROI) from each coverslip/well, and analysis was carried out using Zen software (Zeiss) by manually counting. At least 100 cells per well were counted. Neuronal differentiation and proliferation were quantified as percentage of positive immunolabeled (β-tubulin-III+ or Ki-67+) cells over the total nuclei staining with Hoechst in each selected area. The fraction of positively stained cells is presented in the labeling index (the number of positively stained cells/total number of cells × 100).
Drug Treatments
A summary of the in vivo experimental procedure, including guanosine treatment, proliferation assays, and behavioral experiments, is presented in Fig. 5.
Guanosine was prepared fresh daily diluted in 0.9% saline. Adult mice (male, 3 to 4 months) were injected intraperitoneally once a day for 26 days either with 8 mg/kg of GUO or vehicle for control animals. Alternatively, to evaluate the effect of an acute guanosine treatment on depressive-like behavior, animals received a single administration with 8 mg/kg of guanosine or vehicle 24 h before testing. This concentration of guanosine has been previously described as neurogenic [26]. Animals were euthanized the day after the last guanosine injection.
Proliferation studies in vivo were performed by BrdU assay (5´-Bromo-2′-deoxyuridine, Sigma #5002). The sterile solution of BrdU was prepared in 0.9% saline at a dilution of 10 mg/ml. For tracing the neurogenesis, adult mice were injected intraperitoneally with BrdU once a day for 5 days (50 mg/kg) during the second week of guanosine treatment (Fig. 5). Animals were euthanized 12 days after the last BrdU injection, at day 26.
Behavioral Analysis
All tests were carried out between 9:00 and 14:00 h. Behavioral analysis was performed in the last week of treatment in the following order: 22nd day, open field; 23th day, object location; 24th day, Y-maze; and 25th day, tail suspension test (Fig. 5). Another set of mice were used to test the acute effect of GUO on tail suspension test, 24 h after a single guanosine (8 mg/kg) administration. Mice were habituated for at least 1 h before the beginning of the tests to the test’s room lighting and temperature conditions. On behavioral test days, animals were treated with guanosine in the afternoon.
Open Field
At the 22nd day of treatment, animals were placed in the center of a white-floor clear-wall acrylic box (40 cm × 40 cm × 40 cm) and allowed to explore it for 30 min freely. The arena was cleaned thoroughly with 20% ethanol in between trials to eliminate olfactory clues. The arena floor was divided into 16 equal quadrants by imaginary lines, which defined the center (four central quadrants) and periphery of the arena. Total distance traveled and time in the center of the arena were analyzed. The amount of time spent in the center of the arena is inversely proportional to anxiety-like behavior [33]. Animal exploration at the open field was monitored through a video camera positioned above the apparatuses, and the videos were later analyzed with the ANY Maze® video tracking (Stoelting Co., Wood Dale, IL, USA) by an experienced experimenter who was unaware of the experimental group of the animals tested.
Object Location Test
At the 23rd day of treatment, object location test was carried out in the same arena to which animals were habituated during the open-field test on the previous day and filmed. Cylindrical plastic objects were fixed to the arena using tape to prevent displacement due to animal exploratory activity during test sessions. In the training session, animals were placed at the center of the arena in the presence of two identical objects located at two arena corners, side by side. Animals could explore them freely for 5 min. The amount of time spent exploring each object was measured with a stopwatch by a trained experimenter blind to animal conditions. The arena was cleaned thoroughly with 20% ethanol in between trials to eliminate olfactory clues. After a 90-min interval, animals were again placed in the arena for a 5-min-long test session, when one object used during training was relocated to the opposite corner of the arena. The amount of time spent exploring each object (familiar vs. relocated object) was again measured. Results were expressed as a percentage of time exploring each object during the test session or as discrimination index (DI), ((DI = time exploring the relocated object − time exploring the familiar object)/(time exploring relocated + familiar) × 100). Animals that recognize the object in a familiar position as such (i.e., learned the task) explore the relocated object > 50% of the total time [34, 35].
Y-Maze Test
At the 24th day of treatment, animals were subjected to the Y-maze spontaneous (or continuous) alternation test. The Y-shaped arena contains three opaque gray arms (D, 30 cm × W, 10 cm × H, 16 cm) at 120o angles from each other. Mice were put at the center of the arena and allowed to explore it for 8 min freely. The arena was cleaned thoroughly with 20% ethanol in between trials to eliminate olfactory clues. An observer, blind to the animal conditions and in an adjacent room, counted the number of alternations between arms and the total number of arm entries. An alternation occurs when an animal enters the three different arms of the maze in three consecutive arm entries. Results are expressed as a percentage of alternations relating to total arm entries [36].
Tail Suspension Test
At the 25th day of treatment, mice were subjected to the tail suspension test. Another independent group of mice received a single administration of 8 mg/kg of guanosine or vehicle 24 h before testing. Visually and acoustically isolated mice were suspended by the tail using adhesive tape 50 cm above the floor, for 6 min. A tape was fixed 1 cm from the animal’s tail top. Immobility time was defined as the amount of time during which the mice hung passively without moving [37]. Total immobility time was counted using a stopwatch by an experienced experimenter blinded to the animals’ experimental group.
Tissue Processing and Immunohistochemistry
After guanosine or saline treatment and behavioral testing, 4 to 5 animals from each experimental group were randomly chosen for immunohistochemistry analysis. Mice were anesthetized with chloral hydrate and were perfusion fixed with 50 ml of 0.9% saline followed by 100 ml 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). The brains were post fixed in 4% PFA and equilibrated in 30% sucrose. After, the brains were embedded in medium (Tissue-Tek OCT compound; VWR #25608-930) and serially sectioned (40 μm-thick) in the coronal plane throughout the dorsal-ventral extent of the hippocampus corresponding to the whole hippocampal extension according to the following coronal coordinates from bregma, − 0.94 to – 2.92 mm (http://www.mbl.org, coronal C57BL/6 J atlas). The sections were cut at − 22 °C with a cryostat (Leica) and stored at − 20 °C in cryoprotectant solution. The section was then processed for free-floating immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously described [38]. Briefly, brain sections in a 1-in-5 series were collected from the cryoprotectant solution, washed three times for 5 min each in 0.1 M PBS, and then incubated in a blocking solution containing 10% normal donkey serum and 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 1 h at room temperature.
BrdU immunostaining was followed according to manufacturer instructions. BrdU is a thymine nucleotide analog that is readily incorporated into the DNA of dividing cells during the S-phase of the cell cycle and is a commonly used marker for cellular proliferation and cell fate analysis using cell-specific markers [39]. Sections were incubated in HCL (1 N) for 10 min on ice to denature DNA, followed by HCl (2 N) for 10 min at room temperature before placing them in an incubator for 20 min at 37 °C. The sections were incubated with 0.1 M borate buffer (pH 8.5) for 12 min and rinsed three times for 5 min each with 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4) with 0.1% Triton X-100 at room temperature. The sections were then incubated with 0.01 M PBS (pH 7.4)/ 0.5% Triton X-100/glycine (0.3 M) containing 10% normal donkey serum for 1 h prior to incubating for 2 days in − 4 °C in a solution containing 5% normal donkey serum, 0.3% Triton X-100, with the primary antibody rat anti-BrdU (1:200 Accurate Chem #MCA2060GA). For double labeling, rabbit anti-doublecortin (DCX) (1:500, Cell signaling #4604S) was added in the following day. Doublecortin is transiently expressed in proliferating progenitor cells and newly generated neuroblasts shortly after cell fate determination [40]. Negative controls were generated by replacing the primary antibodies with PBS. After rinsing three times for 10 min each in PBS/0.1% Triton X-100, the sections were incubated 1 h in fluorescent-coupled secondary antibodies diluted 1:2000 (Alexa Fluor Donkey anti-rat 647, Alexa Fluor donkey anti-rabbit 488, Life Technologies). After a final rinse in PBS for 10 min, sections were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 (5 μg/ml), mounted on slides (Superfrost Plus; Daigger), air-dried, and coverslipped with ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen).
Cell Counting
Brain sections were mounted on glass slides, and fluorescence signals were imaged using a Zeiss LSM710 confocal laser scanning microscope. Quantification of BrdU+ cells was determined by manual counting all fluorescent cells in one of every fifth coronal section of the granular and subgranular layer (SGZ) of the DG of the hippocampus. BrdU+ cells were counted using a 40× objective, the sum was multiplied by 5 to obtain an estimate of the total number of BrdU+ cells per animal and reported as mean ± SE. Small BrdU-labeled nuclei (presumed to be glial precursors) at the hilar border and linear (endothelial-like) immunostained forms were excluded from the analysis [41]. For double labeling, the percentage of BrdU-labeled cells that also expressed DCX+ (BrdU/DCX+) was determined by counting of labeled cells throughout the DG with a 60× oil immersion objective. Colocalization analysis was manually done by visual inspection of the size and shape of cells throughout a Z-stack (spanned between 3 and 5 μm in the Z-dimension). Cells were scored positive when the DCX+ labeling was unambiguously associated with a BrdU+ cells. Colocalization was identified by the appearance of a merged color. Only DCX+ immature neurons that had a minimal dendritic tree overlap with adjacent cells were included to avoid ambiguity [42].
Statistics
All data are expressed as mean ± SEM. The n value represents the number of independent experiments and/or the number of mice. Data were analyzed using either a one-sample Student’s t test comparing the mean exploration percentage time for each object with the chance value of 50% or Student’s t test comparing experimental groups. The analysis with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test, and differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. All statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software.
Results
Guanosine Stimulates Proliferation of Neural Stem Cells
All secondary neurospheres from SVZ abundantly expressed the Nestin and Ki-67 counterstained with Hoechst indicating that they were neural stem/progenitor cells (after 7 DIV, Fig. 1a). To ascertain the effects of guanosine (GUO) on NSC self-renewal and clonality, we cultured NSCs from SVZ for 7 days or NSCs from DG for 14 days in the N2 growth medium. For treatment experiments, 100 μM of guanosine was added to the N2 medium. Quantitative analysis revealed that the neurosphere-forming frequency in cultures treated with GUO was significantly increased in SVZ (control, 62.89 ± 6.973; GUO, 97.47 ± 4.501; P = 0.004; Fig. 1b–c) and DG (control, 80.33 ± 2.75; GUO, 111 ± 4.59; P = 0.029; Fig. 2a–b) as compared with the control. The number of NSCs obtained following dissociation was significantly increased with GUO treatment in SVZ (1.4-fold increase P = 0.02; Fig. 1d) and DG (1.2-fold increase P = 0.03; Fig. 2c). GUO did not alter mean neurosphere diameter in SVZ (control, 104.4 ± 4.476; 106.6 ± 5.907; Fig. 1e), DG (control, 113.2 ± 1.877; GUO, 102.5 ± 3.168; Fig. 2d), or cell death (Figs. 1f and 2e).
Previous studies have demonstrated that NSCs express purinergic adenosine (A1, A2A, and A2B) [13] and ATP (some P2Y and P2X) receptors [43]. In this study, we used the same concentration of adenosine (ADO, 100 μM) to compare with GUO treatment in NSC cultures from DG. At this concentration, adenosine did not show significant differences in the number of neurospheres per well as compared with control. But when compared with GUO, there is a significant 1.4-fold decrease (GUO, 111 ± 4.59; ADO, 74.78 ± 16.61; P < 0.05, Fig. 2b). Adenosine treatment significantly reduced (P < 0.0001) cell density and neurospheres diameter (ADO, 59.12 ± 3.541) compared with control and GUO (Fig. 2 c and d), with a small significant increase (P < 0.05) in cell death as compared with GUO (Fig. 2e).
NSC proliferation is sensitive to differential adenosine concentration, and the addition of adenosine in lower concentrations (1 μM) has been shown to increase the number of neurospheres [44]. Next, we examined whether extracellular adenosine levels affect guanosine-induced proliferation. The neurospheres cultured from DG were pretreated with adenosine deaminase (ADA, 0.5 U/ml) to remove extracellular adenosine levels by converting it to inosine. We observed a significant 1.5-fold decrease in the neurosphere-forming frequency compared with the control group (DG control, 80.33 ± 2.75; ADA, 53.50 ± 6.245; P < 0.05) and a significant change in the effect of guanosine by a 1.4-fold decrease compared with GUO treatment alone (GUO, 111 ± 4.59; GUO + ADA, 76.83 ± 6.405; P < 0.01; Fig. 2f–g). There was a significant decrease (P < 0.01) in the neurospheres’ diameters following ADA treatment (Fig. 2h).
The neurosphere clusters contain, in addition to NSCs, neuronal and glial progenitors in different states of differentiation. To determine whether GUO affected the Nestin-positive cell division with less accompanying differentiation, NSCs from DG were grown as an adherent monolayer in appropriate medium and labeled with the proliferation marker Ki-67. As shown in Fig. 3a, the cells abundantly express the NSC marker Nestin, and the percentage of Nestin+ Ki-67+ is significantly increased (P < 0.05) when NSCs were cultured with GUO in the presence of growth factors (Fig. 3b).
Guanosine Stimulates NSC Differentiation
We then investigated the effect of GUO on NSC differentiation. NSCs isolated from DG are multipotent and can differentiate into both neurons and glia under differentiation conditions [29]. Neurospheres from DG were induced to differentiate after the withdrawal of growth factors in coated coverslips. After 1 week of differentiation, neurospheres typically give rise to mostly GFAP+ astrocyte and few β-tubulin-III+ neurons (Fig. 4a) [29, 45]. The GUO treatment resulted in a significant increase (P < 0.05) in the percentage of β-tubulin III+ neurons compared with the control group (Fig. 4 b and c).
Tracing Neurogenesis In Vivo
To investigate the effects of GUO treatment on adult neurogenesis in vivo, adult C57BL/6 mice received intraperitoneal GUO administration during 26 consecutive days, followed by BrdU administration to label dividing cells (Fig. 5). We observed a significant 1.3-fold increase in the number of BrdU-labeled cells in the SGZ of DG from mice treated with GUO compared with control (control, 408.8 ± 42.93; GUO, 542.0 ± 26.25; P = 0.031, Fig. 6).
To examine neuronal differentiation and survival, we quantified BrdU+/DCX+ double-labeled neurons in the same animals. According to our timeline, DCX would label cells that are from a few days to about 2 weeks of age before mice euthanasia [46]. The ratios of BrdU+/DCX+ cells to BrdU+ cells significantly increase after GUO treatment compared with control (control, 44.27% ± 9.430%; 79.32% ± 4.460; P = 0.008, Fig. 6 a and c).
Behavioral Analysis
Hippocampal adult neurogenesis is frequently associated with improved learning and memory and antidepressant-like behavior in various experimental settings [47, 48]. In the current study, we observed increased hippocampal neurogenesis after GUO treatment and therefore assessed the potential effects of GUO on memory performance and antidepressant-like behavior in adult mice.
First, the open-field test was used to access general health, exploratory behavior, and anxiety in mice after GUO treatment. There were no effects of GUO treatment on locomotor activity (P > 0.05, total distance, Fig. 7a) and anxiety-related behavior measured for 5 min (P = 0.572, time in the center, Fig. 7b) or 30 min (data not showed). Moreover, GUO treatment did not alter spatial learning and memory addressed on the object relocation test (Fig. 7c–e) or on the continuous alternation in the Y-maze test (Fig. 7f–g).
Importantly, a significantly decreased immobility time (P > 0.05) in the tail suspension test was found after GUO treatment for 26 days (Fig. 8a), indicative of an antidepressant-like profile. However, this effect was not observed following a single GUO (8 mg/kg) administration 24 h before the tail suspension test (Fig. 8b).
Discussion
In the present study, we have explored the effects of GUO treatment on cell proliferation and the generation of new neurons in hippocampal NSCs in vitro. We also analyzed the effects of GUO on hippocampal neurogenesis in adult mice and the putative improvement on neurobehavioral performance.
The current results revealed that GUO treatment increased the proliferation of neural stem and progenitor cells, as evidenced by increased sphere-forming frequency in the neurosphere cultures from SVZ and DG, and the Ki-67 labeling to proliferating cells in the adherent monolayer culture. However, the diameter of the neurospheres, which is often used to assess mitogenic potential, was not affected. Therefore, taken together, these results indicate that GUO treatment is more involved in the increase of self-renewal capacity to form tertiary neurospheres. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first evidence showing that guanosine promotes the proliferation of adult NSCs in vitro. Further studies are necessary to fully address the GUO cell-intrinsic mechanisms to control cell cycle and maintenance of multipotency.
Our in vitro data suggest that extracellular adenosine is needed to increase the number of neurospheres, and guanosine alone cannot reverse the effects of inhibition of neurosphere-forming frequency due to ADA pretreatment. This observation suggests that some partial effects of adenosine together with guanosine are needed to induce cell proliferation. Then, as observed here, it is possible that low adenosine levels may be beneficial to this proliferative effect of guanosine. It was suggested that GUO might increase extracellular adenosine disposition in vascular and endothelial cell cultures [49], an effect that was not confirmed in neural cells, and the mechanism is not yet understood. Therefore, it is not clear whether GUO effects depend on increasing adenosine levels or may be due to a direct modulation on adenosine receptors.
Previous studies confirmed the expression of adenosine receptor mRNA and protein in young and adult neurospheres, where adenosine treatment presented a concentration-dependent effect [50]. In secondary neurospheres cultured from adult mice, the lower concentration of adenosine (1 μM) may be beneficial to the neurosphere-forming frequency, where at high concentrations (10–100 μM), adenosine leads to an opposite effect [44, 50, 51], as observed in our study, although it was also observed that adenosine concentration of 10 and 30 μM induced proliferation of NSCs [13]. In that study, activation of adenosine A1 receptor induces the proliferation of NSCs, and the blockade of MEK/ERK and Akt inhibits such effect. This same signaling pathway is often present in the protective action of GUO in several experimental models of neurodegeneration [14]. We previously showed that GUO neuroprotective effect depends on adenosine receptor modulation [22, 23]. Additionally, these intracellular pathways are involved in the effect of GUO promoting the survival and maturation of primary cerebellar neurons in culture [24]. However, the exact mechanisms and molecular targets involved in the GUO effect to induce NSC proliferation remain to be elucidated.
In our in vivo study, GUO treatment induced an increase in the percentage of cells expressing β-tubulin III+ neurons suggesting that GUO can promote a pro-neuronal fate choice on cell differentiation. By contrast, Benito-Muñoz et al. (2016) reported that the same concentration of adenosine inhibits neuronal differentiation in adult neurosphere culture through activation of A1 receptors resulting in gliogenesis [51].
To further support the functional role of GUO, we analyzed the effect of GUO treatment in the neurogenic niche of adult C57BL/6 mice in vivo. In this study, we identified GUO as a neurogenic factor, increasing BrdU+ and BrdU/DCX+ cells in the SGZ of DG in the adult hippocampus. The last administration of BrdU was 12 days before fixation, suggesting a survival effect of BrdU+/DCX+ cells favoring increased net hippocampal neurogenesis resulting from guanosine treatment.
A recent related study in Swiss mice evaluated the effect of GUO on hippocampal cell proliferation by immunohistochemistry against the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and Ki-67 [27]. However, no significant differences between vehicle and GUO-treated mice (5 mg/kg/day, p.o., for 21 days) were observed with regard to the number of proliferating cells in the entire hippocampal DG. This absence of results may be due to the drawback of using Ki-67 for proliferation as it reflects only a snapshot of the amount of proliferation at the time of tissue collection [52]. On the other hand, our study using repeated administration of BrdU allows for labeling all dividing cells and further investigating the fate of BRDU+ NSCs in the brain.
A presumptive role of new neurons in hippocampal functions such as learning and memory or depression-related behaviors is one of the major hypotheses on adult neurogenesis. Our data, together with Bettio and collaborators [27], provide support to the association of neurogenesis and antidepressant effects following chronic GUO treatment. Interestingly, a single GUO administration did not alter the immobility time of mice in the tail suspension test when assessed after 24 h, indicating the relevance of the GUO neurogenic action in its antidepressant effect. Moreover, previous in vivo studies also showed that guanosine-induced neurogenesis is accompanied by an improved functional outcome in rodent models of Parkinsonism [26] and stroke [53]. Although the experimental conditions differ from ours, taken together, these data support the effect of GUO in neurogenesis and behavior.
While in this study we observed a neurogenesis increase throughout the dorsal-ventral extent of the hippocampus, it is worthwhile to notice that cells in the hippocampus present a functional heterogeneity within the structure. Studies targeting different regions on the hippocampus revealed that the dorsal DG controls spatial learning, memory, exploration, and navigation, as well as visuospatial processing, whereas the ventral DG regulates hormone release, reward processing, anxiety, depression, and executive function [54]. These findings correlate with Bettio (2016) reports showing that guanosine treatment resulted in a significant increase in the number of NeuroD+ cells localized to the ventral hippocampal DG [27]. We did not observe differences in cognitive tasks assessed in the object location or the Y-maze tests; however, there was little margin left to detect a possible improvement because all experimental groups performed well in the task. Future experiments with disruption of neurogenesis may determine the impact of GUO in cognitive function.
In summary, we showed that GUO treatment promotes cell proliferation and the generation of new neurons in hippocampal NSCs in vitro. Moreover, in adult mice, guanosine promotes hippocampal neurogenesis and an antidepressant-like effect, without altering parameters related to learning, memory, or anxiety-like behaviors. Although guanosine still does not have a clear molecular target identified, its neuroprotective effects are widely described [55]. Additionally, while guanosine may modulate extracellular adenosine levels to enhance neurogenesis in adults, it is a much safer drug without the undesirable peripheral side effects of adenosine [49]. Furthermore, the data presented here suggest that molecules that increase neurogenesis in adult-born neurons may be beneficial to treat depression.
References
Lazarov O, Mattson MP, Peterson DA, Pimplikar SW, van Praag H (2010) When neurogenesis encounters aging and disease. Trends Neurosci 33(12):569–579
Braun SM, Jessberger S (2014) Adult neurogenesis: mechanisms and functional significance. Development 141(10):1983–1986
Patrício P, Mateus-Pinheiro A, Irmler M, Alves ND, Machado-Santos AR, Morais M, Correia JS, Korostynski M et al (2015) Differential and converging molecular mechanisms of antidepressants’ action in the hippocampal dentate gyrus. Neuropsychopharmacology 40(2):338–349
Dong J et al (2019) A neuronal molecular switch through cell-cell contact that regulates quiescent neural stem cells. Sci Adv 5(2):eaav4416
Zhao C, Deng W, Gage FH (2008) Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell 132(4):645–660
Zhang J, Jiao J (2015) Molecular biomarkers for embryonic and adult neural stem cell and neurogenesis. Biomed Res Int 2015:727542
Lledo PM, Alonso M, Grubb MS (2006) Adult neurogenesis and functional plasticity in neuronal circuits. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(3):179–193
Urbán N, Guillemot F (2014) Neurogenesis in the embryonic and adult brain: same regulators, different roles. Front Cell Neurosci 8:396
Ribeiro DE, Glaser T, Oliveira-Giacomelli A, Ulrich H (2019) Purinergic receptors in neurogenic processes. Brain Res Bull 151:3–11
Braun N, Sévigny J, Mishra SK, Robson SC, Barth SW, Gerstberger R, Hammer K, Zimmermann H (2003) Expression of the ecto-ATPase NTPDase2 in the germinal zones of the developing and adult rat brain. Eur J Neurosci 17(7):1355–1364
Cao X, Li LP, Qin XH, Li SJ, Zhang M, Wang Q, Hu HH, Fang YY et al (2013) Astrocytic adenosine 5′-triphosphate release regulates the proliferation of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Stem Cells 31(8):1633–1643
Lin JH et al (2007) Purinergic signaling regulates neural progenitor cell expansion and neurogenesis. Dev Biol 302(1):356–366
Migita H, Kominami K, Higashida M, Maruyama R, Tuchida N, McDonald F, Shimada F, Sakurada K (2008) Activation of adenosine A1 receptor-induced neural stem cell proliferation via MEK/ERK and Akt signaling pathways. J Neurosci Res 86(13):2820–2828
Lanznaster D, Dal-Cim T, Piermartiri TCB, Tasca CI (2016) Guanosine: a neuromodulator with therapeutic potential in brain disorders. Aging Dis 7(5):657–679
Uemura Y, Miller JM, Matson WR, Beal MF (1991) Neurochemical analysis of focal ischemia in rats. Stroke 22(12):1548–1553
Ciccarelli R, di Iorio P, Giuliani P, D'Alimonte I, Ballerini P, Caciagli F, Rathbone MP (1999) Rat cultured astrocytes release guanine-based purines in basal conditions and after hypoxia/hypoglycemia. Glia 25(1):93–98
Robertson CL, Bell MJ, Kochanek PM, Adelson PD, Ruppel RA, Carcillo JA, Wisniewski SR, Mi Z et al (2001) Increased adenosine in cerebrospinal fluid after severe traumatic brain injury in infants and children: association with severity of injury and excitotoxicity. Crit Care Med 29(12):2287–2293
Zimmermann H, Zebisch M, Sträter N (2012) Cellular function and molecular structure of ecto-nucleotidases. Purinergic Signal 8(3):437–502
Rathbone MP, Middlemiss P, Andrew C, Caciagli F, Ciccarelli R, Iorio PD, Huang R (1998) The trophic effects of purines and purinergic signaling in pathologic reactions of astrocytes. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord 12(Suppl 2):S36–S45
Ciccarelli R, Ballerini P, Sabatino G, Rathbone MP, D'Onofrio M, Caciagli F, di Iorio P (2001) Involvement of astrocytes in purine-mediated reparative processes in the brain. Int J Dev Neurosci 19(4):395–414
Su C, Wang P, Jiang C, Ballerini P, Caciagli F, Rathbone MP, Jiang S (2013) Guanosine promotes proliferation of neural stem cells through cAMP-CREB pathway. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents 27(3):673–680
Dal-Cim T, Ludka FK, Martins WC, Reginato C, Parada E, Egea J, López MG, Tasca CI (2013) Guanosine controls inflammatory pathways to afford neuroprotection of hippocampal slices under oxygen and glucose deprivation conditions. J Neurochem 126(4):437–450
Dal-Cim T, Poluceno GG, Lanznaster D, de Oliveira KA, Nedel CB, Tasca CI (2019) Guanosine prevents oxidative damage and glutamate uptake impairment induced by oxygen/glucose deprivation in cortical astrocyte cultures: involvement of a. Purinergic Signal 15:465–476
Decker H, Piermartiri TCB, Nedel CB, Romão LF, Francisco SS, Dal-Cim T, Boeck CR, Moura-Neto V et al (2019) Guanosine and GMP increase the number of granular cerebellar neurons in culture: dependence on adenosine A. Purinergic Signal 15:439–450
Jiang S, Ballerini P, Buccella S, Giuliani P, Jiang C, Huang X, Rathbone MP (2008) Remyelination after chronic spinal cord injury is associated with proliferation of endogenous adult progenitor cells after systemic administration of guanosine. Purinergic Signal 4(1):61–71
Su C, Elfeki N, Ballerini P, D'Alimonte I, Bau C, Ciccarelli R, Caciagli F, Gabriele J et al (2009) Guanosine improves motor behavior, reduces apoptosis, and stimulates neurogenesis in rats with parkinsonism. J Neurosci Res 87(3):617–625
Bettio LE et al (2016) The antidepressant-like effect of chronic guanosine treatment is associated with increased hippocampal neuronal differentiation. Eur J Neurosci 43(8):1006–1015
Guo W, Patzlaff NE, Jobe EM, Zhao X (2012) Isolation of multipotent neural stem or progenitor cells from both the dentate gyrus and subventricular zone of a single adult mouse. Nat Protoc 7(11):2005–2012
Walker TL, Kempermann G (2014) One mouse, two cultures: isolation and culture of adult neural stem cells from the two neurogenic zones of individual mice. J Vis Exp 84:e51225
Dal-Cim T, Martins WC, Thomaz DT, Coelho V, Poluceno GG, Lanznaster D, Vandresen-Filho S, Tasca CI (2016) Neuroprotection promoted by guanosine depends on glutamine synthetase and glutamate transporters activity in hippocampal slices subjected to oxygen/glucose deprivation. Neurotox Res 29(4):460–468
Lee JH, Shaker MR, Lee E, Lee B, Sun W (2020) NeuroCore formation during differentiation of neurospheres of mouse embryonic neural stem cells. Stem Cell Res 43:101691
Sasaki R, Aoki S, Yamato M, Uchiyama H, Wada K, Ogiuchi H, Okano T, Ando T (2010) A protocol for immunofluorescence staining of floating neurospheres. Neurosci Lett 479(2):126–127
Prut L, Belzung C (2003) The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: a review. Eur J Pharmacol 463(1–3):3–33
Ennaceur A, Neave N, Aggleton JP (1997) Spontaneous object recognition and object location memory in rats: the effects of lesions in the cingulate cortices, the medial prefrontal cortex, the cingulum bundle and the fornix. Exp Brain Res 113(3):509–519
Assini FL, Duzzioni M, Takahashi RN (2009) Object location memory in mice: pharmacological validation and further evidence of hippocampal CA1 participation. Behav Brain Res 204(1):206–211
Hughes RN (2004) The value of spontaneous alternation behavior (SAB) as a test of retention in pharmacological investigations of memory. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 28(5):497–505
Steru L, Chermat R, Thierry B, Simon P (1985) The tail suspension test: a new method for screening antidepressants in mice. Psychopharmacology 85(3):367–370
Piermartiri TC, Pan H, Chen J, McDonough J, Grunberg N, Apland JP, Marini AM (2015) Alpha-linolenic acid-induced increase in neurogenesis is a key factor in the improvement in the passive avoidance task after soman exposure. NeuroMolecular Med 17(3):251–269
Taupin P (2007) BrdU immunohistochemistry for studying adult neurogenesis: paradigms, pitfalls, limitations, and validation. Brain Res Rev 53(1):198–214
Brown JP, Couillard-Després S, Cooper-Kuhn CM, Winkler J, Aigner L, Kuhn HG (2003) Transient expression of doublecortin during adult neurogenesis. J Comp Neurol 467(1):1–10
Parent JM (2008) Persistent hippocampal neurogenesis and epilepsy. Epilepsia 49(Suppl 5):1–2
Rao MS, Hattiangady B, Shetty AK (2006) The window and mechanisms of major age-related decline in the production of new neurons within the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. Aging Cell 5(6):545–558
Oliveira Á, Illes P, Ulrich H (2016) Purinergic receptors in embryonic and adult neurogenesis. Neuropharmacology 104:272–281
Mishra SK, Braun N, Shukla V, Füllgrabe M, Schomerus C, Korf HW, Gachet C, Ikehara Y et al (2006) Extracellular nucleotide signaling in adult neural stem cells: synergism with growth factor-mediated cellular proliferation. Development 133(4):675–684
Xiong F, Gao H, Zhen Y, Chen X, Lin W, Shen J, Yan Y, Wang X et al (2011) Optimal time for passaging neurospheres based on primary neural stem cell cultures. Cytotechnology 63(6):621–631
Kuipers SD, Schroeder JE, Trentani A (2015) Changes in hippocampal neurogenesis throughout early development. Neurobiol Aging 36(1):365–379
Hill AS, Sahay A, Hen R (2015) Increasing adult hippocampal neurogenesis is sufficient to reduce anxiety and depression-like behaviors. Neuropsychopharmacology 40(10):2368–2378
Morais M, Patrício P, Mateus-Pinheiro A, Alves ND, Machado-Santos AR, Correia JS, Pereira J, Pinto L et al (2017) The modulation of adult neuroplasticity is involved in the mood-improving actions of atypical antipsychotics in an animal model of depression. Transl Psychiatry 7(6):e1146
Jackson EK, Cheng D, Jackson TC, Verrier JD, Gillespie DG (2013) Extracellular guanosine regulates extracellular adenosine levels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 304(5):C406–C421
Stafford MR, Bartlett PF, Adams DJ (2007) Purinergic receptor activation inhibits mitogen-stimulated proliferation in primary neurospheres from the adult mouse subventricular zone. Mol Cell Neurosci 35(4):535–548
Benito-Muñoz M, Matute C, Cavaliere F (2016) Adenosine A1 receptor inhibits postnatal neurogenesis and sustains astrogliogenesis from the subventricular zone. Glia 64(9):1465–1478
Eminaga S et al (2016) Detection of cell proliferation markers by immunofluorescence staining and microscopy imaging in paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 115:14.25.1–14.25.14
Deng G, Qiu Z, Li D, Fang Y, Zhang S (2017) Delayed administration of guanosine improves long-term functional recovery and enhances neurogenesis and angiogenesis in a mouse model of photothrombotic stroke. Mol Med Rep 15(6):3999–4004
O'Leary OF, Cryan JF (2014) A ventral view on antidepressant action: roles for adult hippocampal neurogenesis along the dorsoventral axis. Trends Pharmacol Sci 35(12):675–687
Tasca CI, Lanznaster D, Oliveira KA, Fernández-Dueñas V, Ciruela F (2018) Neuromodulatory effects of guanine-based purines in health and disease. Front Cell Neurosci 12:376
Funding
Research supported by grants from the Brazilian funding agencies to C.I.T.: CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico)—INCT for Excitotoxicity and Neuroprotection; CNPq Productivity Fellowship. T.C.B.P. was the recipient of a post-doctoral fellowship from CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Ensino Superior- PAJT—88881.067963/2014-01), and B.S. was the recipient of a Master fellowship from CAPES. FGQBA received Ph.D. fellowship from CNPq.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Experiments followed the “Principles of Laboratory Animal Care” (NIH 2011) and were approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of the Federal University of Santa Catarina (CEUA/UFSC 1454270417).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Disclosures
The financial support agencies had no further role in study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Piermartiri, T.C.B., dos Santos, B., Barros-Aragão, F.G.Q. et al. Guanosine Promotes Proliferation in Neural Stem Cells from Hippocampus and Neurogenesis in Adult Mice. Mol Neurobiol 57, 3814–3826 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-01977-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-020-01977-4