Abstract
The magnetic properties of Ni thin films, in the range 20–500 nm, at the crystalline-nanocrystalline interface are reported. The effect of thickness, substrate and substrate temperature has been studied. For the films deposited at ambient temperatures on borosilicate glass substrates, the crystallite size, coercive field and magnetization energy density first increase and achieve a maximum at a critical value of thickness and decrease thereafter. At a thickness of 50 nm, the films deposited at ambient temperature onto borosilicate glass, MgO and silicon do not exhibit long-range order but are magnetic as is evident from the non-zero coercive field and magnetization energy. Phase contrast microscopy revealed that the grain sizes increase from a value of 30–50 nm at ambient temperature to 120–150 nm at 503 K and remain approximately constant in this range up to 593 K. The existence of grain boundary walls of width 30–50 nm is demonstrated using phase contrast images. The grain boundary area also stagnates at higher substrate temperature. There is pronounced shape anisotropy as evidenced by the increased aspect ratio of the grains as a function of substrate temperature. Nickel thin films of 50 nm show the absence of long-range crystalline order at ambient temperature growth conditions and a preferred [111] orientation at higher substrate temperatures. Thin films are found to be thermally relaxed at elevated deposition temperature and having large compressive strain at ambient temperature. This transition from nanocrystalline to crystalline order causes a peak in the coercive field in the region of transition as a function of thickness and substrate temperature. The saturation magnetization on the other hand increases with increase in substrate temperature.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Amoruso S, Ausanio G, Lisio C D, Iannotti V, Vitiello M, Wang X and Lanotte L 2005 Appl. Surf. Sci. 247 71
Aurongzeb D, Ram K B and Menon L 2005 Appl. Phys. Lett. 87 172509
Barmak K et al 2006 Scr. Mater. 54 1059
Battle X and Labarta A 2002 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 35 R15
Bertotti G 1998 Hysteresis in magnetism (London, UK: Academic Press) p. 375
Castaldi L, Gibbs M R J and Davies H A 2004 J. Appl. Phys. 96 5063
Chan K Y, Tou T Y and Teo B S 2006 Microelectronics J. 37 930
Chang S W, Liu J H and Lue J T 2003 Meas. Sci. Technol. 14 583
Cullity B D 1972 Introduction to magnetic materials (MA: Addison-Wesley) p. 387
Dirks A G and Leamy H J 1977 Thin Solid Films 47 219
Flynn D and Desmulliez M 2006 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 34 112
Fujikawa K, Suzuki S, Koike Y, Chun W J and Asakura K 2006 Surf. Sci. 600 L117
Gafner Y Y, Gafner S L and Entel P 2004 Phys. Solid State 46 1327
Girgis E, Pogossian S P and Benkhedar M L 2006 J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 6 1135
Guan S and Nelson B J 2005 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 292 49
Gupta N, Verma A, Kashyap S C and Dube D C 2007 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 308 137
Ha K, Ciria M, O’Handley R C, Stephens P W and Pagola S 1999 Phys. Rev. B19 13780
Ha N D, Phan M H and Kim C O 2006 J. Appl. Phys. 99 08F105–1
Haque S A, Matsuo A, Seino Y, Yamamoto Y, Yamada S and Hori H 2001 Physica B305 121
Herger G 1992 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 112 258
Hong J, Gary S W, Jones J W and Moody N R 1997 J. Appl. Phys. 81 6754
Hsieh C T, Liu J Q and Lue J T 2005 Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 1899
Kachkachi H, Nogues M, Tronc E and Garanin D A 2000 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 221 158
Kim J G, Han K H, Song S H and Reilly A 2003 Thin Solid Films 440 54
Klapetek P, Ohlídal I and Buršík J 2007 Meas. Sci. Technol. 18 528
Lukaszew R A, Zhang Z, Stoica V and Clarke R 2003 Appl. Surf. Sci. 219 74
Messier R, Giri A P and Roy R A 1984 J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 2 500
Novikov V Y 1999 Acta Mater. 47 4507
Ohandley R C 2000 Modern magnetic materials (New York: Wiley Interscience) p. 306
Ravinder D, Kumar K V and Reddy A V R 2003 Mater. Letts 57 4162
Savaloni H and Shaharaki M G 2004 Nanotechnology 15 311
Sedlácková K, Lobotka P, Vávra I and Radnóczi G 2005 Carbon 43 2192
Seel S C, Thompson C V, Hearne S J and Floro J A 2000 J. Appl. Phys. 88 7079
Serrona L K E B et al 2003 Appl. Phys. Lett. 82 1751
Shalyguina E E, Mukasheva M A, Abrosimova N M, Kozlovskii L, Tamanis E and Shalygin A N 2006 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 300 e367
Shimizu H, Hayashi T, Nishinaga T and Tanaka M 1999 Appl. Phys. Lett. 74 398
Snyder D W, Mahajan S, Ko E I and Sides P J 1991 Appl. Phys. Lett. 58 848
Swerts J, Temst K, Vandamme N, Haesendonck C V and Bruynseraede Y 2002 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 240 380
Thompson C V 1999 J. Mater. Res. 14 3164
Wang Y H, Sood D K and Ghantasala M K 2002 Proc. SPIE 4936 394
Yang J, Huang Y and Xu K 2007 Surf. Coat. Technol. 201 5574
Yi J B et al 2004 J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 284 303
Zhang K, Rotter F, Uhrmacher M, Ronning C, Krauser J and Hofsäss H 2007 New J. Phys. 9 29
Zhang W H, Sun C Q and Li S 2004 Solid State Commun. 130 603
Zhao Y P, Gamache R M, Wang G C, Lu T M, Palasantzas G and Hosson J T M D 2001 J. Appl. Phys. 89 1325
Zheng G P, Gross D and Li M 2003 J. Appl. Phys. 93 7652
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumar, P., Ghanashyam Krishna, M. & Bhattacharya, A.K. Effect of microstructural evolution on magnetic properties of Ni thin films. Bull Mater Sci 32, 263–270 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-009-0040-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-009-0040-x