Abstract
Background
Literature on diabetes insipidus (DI) after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) is scarce. Some studies have reported varying frequencies of DI and have showed its association with increased mortality, suggesting it as a marker of poor outcome. This knowledge gap in the acute care consequences of DI in severe TBI patients led us to conceive this study, aimed at identifying risk factors and quantifying the effect of DI on short-term functional outcomes and mortality.
Methods
We assembled a historic cohort of adult patients with severe TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 8) admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary-care university hospital over a 6-year period. Basic demographic characteristics, clinical information, imaging findings, and laboratory results were collected. We used logistic regression models to assess potential risk factors for the development of DI, and the association of this condition with death and unfavorable functional outcomes [modified Rankin scale (mRS)] at hospital discharge.
Results
A total of 317 patients were included in the study. The frequency of DI was 14.82%, and it presented at a median of 2 days (IQR 1–3) after ICU admission. Severity according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) score of the head, intracerebral hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and skull base fracture was suggested as risk factors for DI. Diagnosis of DI was independently associated death (OR 4.34, CI 95% 1.92–10.11, p = 0.0005) and unfavorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale = 4–6) at discharge (OR 7.38; CI 95% 2.15–37.21, p = 0.0047).
Conclusions
Diabetes insipidus is a frequent and early complication in patients with severe TBI in the ICU and is strongly associated with increased mortality and poor short-term outcomes. We provide clinically useful risk factors that will help detect DI early to improve prognosis and therapy of patients with severe TBI.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and lifelong disability worldwide [1]. Some estimates show that TBI accounts for 9% of deaths around the world and represents a threat to health in every country [2]. Although causes of TBI vary depending on income and region, the high direct and indirect costs that it generates are common to all countries, and make it a socioeconomic issue of increasing importance. It is often referred to as “the silent epidemic,” given its continuous rise in incidence and its concomitant burden across high-, middle-, and low-income countries [3].
A recent comprehensive model by Dewan et al. [4] has estimated all-cause, all-severity TBI global incidence at 79 Mio. cases every year (939 cases per 100.000). According to this model, 11% of TBIs are moderate [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 9–12] and 8% severe (GCS < or = 8); roughly 6.3 Mio. severe cases per year, of which around 10% die due to primary injury alone. For the remaining, effects of secondary injury contribute to the high mortality and long-term disability that characterizes severe TBI. As such, outcomes of patients with severe TBI are strongly related to its many potential complications during intensive care unit (ICU) stay, which may arise from the pathophysiologic processes triggered by primary and secondary injury [5].
Among these complications, disorders of salt and water are the most commonly recognized during the immediate post-TBI period, and have been previously suggested as markers of poor outcome [6]. Diabetes insipidus (DI) is one of such disorders, for which the causes and mechanism of disease are widely discussed in academy. Surprisingly, the evidence regarding its frequency and effects during the first days after trauma is scarce, and although it is generally considered a transient condition, little has been studied regarding its implications on short-term outcomes [7].
Heterogeneity in the diagnostic criteria of studies assessing DI has made its incidence and prevalence difficult to estimate. It is known that when DI ensues, the systematic loss of diluted water typically leads to hypovolemic hypernatremia, and along with ensuing hypotension, hypoxemia, and the resulting brain water shift, it is likely to further aggravate secondary injury. Hypernatremia from DI also limits the use of solutions like hypertonic saline, and thus hinders the management of intracranial hypertension, another high-value therapeutic target in these patients.
Agha et al. [6] published two TBI case series in which prevalence of DI was shown to range from 2.9 to 26% [8]. One prospective study by Hadjizacharia et al. [9] brought light on this matter by finding an association between DI and mortality after severe TBI, thus highlighting the clinical relevance of this syndrome in the critical care setting. This study identified DI as an independent risk factor for death, but its effect on the functional short-term outcome of patients was not assessed. This knowledge gap led us to conceive this study, aimed at measuring the frequency of DI, identifying risk factors for DI development and quantifying its effect on short-term outcomes among patients with severe TBI admitted to the ICU.
Methods
Design and study population
Before conducting this study, we received approval by our institutional biomedical research ethics board. We studied a historic cohort that included patients that presented with severe traumatic brain injury at the emergency department of a tertiary-care university hospital in Cali, Colombia, between January 2011 and December 2016. Inclusion criteria were age over 18 years old and traumatic brain injury with GCS < or = 8 upon arrival. Exclusion criteria were patient deemed unsalvageable in the first 24 h of ICU admission for whom therapeutic effort was redirected to palliative care, and patients with brain death diagnosis in the first 24 h of ICU admission. These exclusion criteria were selected because TBI patients who die early are not at risk of developing DI, and as such should not be considered to measure its frequency during ICU stay.
Data collection
We retrieved electronic clinical records from the described 6-year period. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were extracted. Head Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) was used to classify patients according to injury severity. The severity of general trauma was calculated using the Injury Severity Score (ISS), as the sum of squares of the AIS scores for the three most severely injured body regions. We used the definition proposed by Butcher and colleagues [10, 11] [(AIS > 3) for at least two different body regions] to determine polytrauma. Only diagnoses made upon ICU stay were taken into account to assess the presence of the water/salt imbalance syndromes in the study population; no retrospective diagnoses were made. For patients diagnosed with DI, values of serum and urinary osmolarity were collected when available. The test is typically ordered upon suspicion of DI given the presence of hypernatremia and polyuria, and the diagnosis is confirmed by the finding of hypo-osmolar urine (< 300 mOsm/L) output consistent with clinical features.
Outcomes
Mortality was defined as death during hospital stay. Short-term functional outcome was assessed using the modified Rankin scale upon hospital discharge. We defined an unfavorable outcome as a modified Rankin scale score (mRs) = or > 4 at hospital discharge (patients dependent on others for basic care). Although less common, this cut-off point for dichotomization is clinically useful, has been previously used in relevant studies [12], and responded to the absence of patients with DI that had mRs = 0–2. Given the poor prognosis typically associated with severe TBI, we also considered adequate to define mRs = 3 as part of a favorable outcome.
Statistical analysis
Results of categorical variables are reported as proportions. Continuous variables are reported as means (± standard deviation) or medians [interquartile range (IQR)], as appropriate. In each group, categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square (χ2) test, and for continuous variables, we used the t test or the Mann–Whitney U test, according to variable distribution. We carried out three different logistic regressions models to (1) identify factors associated with and clinical predictors for the development of DI, and (2) estimate the effect of diabetes insipidus and sodium disturbances on mortality, and (3) on short-term functional outcomes.
A purposeful variable selection approach was employed for building the multivariate models. Variables with statistical significance as assessed by the Wald test (p value < 0.25) were selected as candidates for each model. We used an iterative process to remove variables from the model if they were nonsignificant (p > 0.10) (according to the LR test) and were not a confounder. We considered that a variable had a confounding effect when change in any estimate was observed to be greater than 20% when compared to the full model. If nonsignificant but acting as a confounder, variables were retained in the model. If nonsignificant and not a confounder, variables were only retained in the model if they were part of the study objective (exposures of interest). Statistical analyses were performed in R studio, Version 1.2.1335 using a 95% confidence level.
Results
Patients baseline and clinical characteristics
A total of 317 patients met criteria for inclusion. Median age was 34 years old (IQR 23–48); 83.6% were male; and 98% had no history of functional limitations (mRs = 0 or 1). Remaining 2% represents three patients with mRs = 2, and three more with mRS = 3; no patient included had severe disability (mRS = 4 or 5) before the traumatic event. These and other baseline characteristics are displayed in Table 1. Table 2 displays relevant therapy received and complications during ICU stay.
Diabetes insipidus and water/sodium disturbances
DI was diagnosed in 47 patients (14.82%); 102 patients (32.18%) developed hypernatremia (serum sodium > 155 mEq/L), and DI was the most likely underlying cause of 46% of hypernatremia cases. Patients with DI had a median serum osmolarity of 329 mOsm/L, (IQR = 318 – 339). Urine osmolarity measurements were available in 68% of patients with DI diagnosis; median urine osmolarity was 210 mOsm/L (IQR = 134–290 mOsm/L). Syndrome of inappropriate ADH secretion (SIADHS) was diagnosed in eight patients (2.52%). Only 29 patients (9.15%), including seven patients with SIADHS, developed hyponatremia (serum sodium < 132 mEq/L), all during ICU stay.
Increasing category of head and neck AIS was significantly associated with development of DI (OR 6.04; 95% CI 2.92–12.4). Multivariate analysis also suggested some specific intracranial lesions as risks factors for the development of DI: subdural hematoma (OR 4.31; 95% CI 1.86–10.0), intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 2.72; 95% CI 1.18–6.26), and skull base fracture (OR 2.91; 95% CI 1.33–6.35) (Table 3).
Patients with DI received management with intravenous vasopressin (87.2%) or desmopressin (12.7%) and required vasopressor therapy more frequently that non-DI patients (74.4 vs 38.8%, p < 0.001). DI was transient in 80% of patients that survived up to hospital discharge (n = 15), persisting in only three patients upon discharge. Other clinical features and laboratory data are displayed in Table 2 for all patients, and according to the presence of DI.
Mortality
In our study, overall mortality was 27.76%. Specific in-ICU mortality was 23.65%. Multivariate analyses—after controlling for severity of trauma (head and neck AIS score and GCS motor score), and other relevant confounders—showed that diagnosis of DI (OR 4.34, CI 95% 1.92–10.11, p = 0.0005) and the presence of acute renal failure (OR 4.69, 95% CI 1.80–12.81, p = 0.0018) had a strong association with a fatal outcome. Finding of a middle cranial fossa fracture also had a strong and independent association with death (OR 4.11, 95% CI 2.06–8.31, p = 0.0007) (see output from the mortality regression model in Table 4).
Outcomes at discharge
Modified Rankin scale score at discharge presented the following distribution: only four patients had mRs = 0, all in the non-DI (control) group. From total, 28% had mRs = 1 or 2, all in the control group too; there were no patients with diagnosis of DI with mRs = 0, 1, or 2 at discharge. Fifteen percent of patients had mRs = 3 (6.4% in DI group vs 16.6% in control group); 15.1% had mRs = 4 (8.5% in DI group vs 16.3% in control group); and 12.9% had mRs = 5 (17% in DI group vs 12.2% in control group); mRs = 6 (death) was described in detail in the mortality section. Figure 1 shows the proportion of patients with unfavorable outcome upon hospital discharge and the absolute number of patients for each category of the mRs, according to the presence of DI. Our regression model showed, after controlling for severity and types of injury, that diabetes insipidus was strongly associated with an unfavorable outcome at discharge (OR 7.38; CI 95% 2.15–37.21, p = 0.0047) (see Table 5).
Discussion
Our study was set to investigate the frequency and effects of DI in severe TBI patients. We found an incidence of DI of 14.8% in our historic cohort, and found strong associations of DI with mortality and unfavorable outcomes at discharge.
Our results regarding the frequency of DI after TBI are comparable to reports from similar studies, although given our definition of DI, it might have been underestimated. Variable follow-up times, heterogeneity in diagnosis criteria, and selection of study subjects may account for the wide range of DI incidence reported in the literature [6, 9, 13, 14]. In our study, DI was diagnosed after a median 2 days of ICU admission, making it an early complication of the severe TBI patient. Also, 80% of survivors with DI had transient DI that resolved previous to hospital discharge, suggesting a partial or reversible lesion as a cause for DI in survivors; brain edema and stalk displacement secondary to expanding lesions may be responsible. We did not obtain data on follow-up after discharge, but we found one study reporting that only 6% of all TBI cases have persistent DI after 12 months of follow-up [13].
Factors associated with diabetes insipidus
Previous studies have demonstrated that TBI and SAH may lead to central diabetes insipidus and other forms of neuroendocrine dysfunction [6, 15,16,17,18]. To our knowledge, only one study has specifically assessed posterior pituitary dysfunction in an adult population after TBI; the study by Hadjizacharia et al. [9], which suggested that head AIS > 3, GCS < 8, and cerebral edema were strong and independently associated with DI. Some studies have assessed several types of endocrinopathies after TBI, suggesting that penetrating injuries, skull base fractures, diffuse axonal injuries, subarachnoid hemorrhage, increased intracranial pressure, prolonged ICU stay, and brain edema as risk factors [8, 15, 19,20,21,22]. In our study, the regression model used to identify risk factors for DI development showed that severity of trauma, subdural hematoma, intracerebral hemorrhage, and skull base fracture was strongly associated with DI development. These data suggest that the presence of one of these lesions should prompt early laboratory tests for detection of DI.
Skull base fractures are known to occur after high-energy impact trauma and lead to fronto-occipital displacement of the brain over the skull base. Such a displacement is likely to provoke damage of the infundibular stalk. Furthermore, infarction or hemorrhage of the pituitary and hypothalamus can also occur due to tearing of perforating and portal vessels [23]. These mechanisms may be responsible for DI cases in patients that died or those for whom DI did not resolve. Space-occupying intracranial lesions (intracerebral hemorrhages and subdural hematomas) increase intracranial pressure, exerting pressure upon the stalk [24], which can lead to transient dysfunction, which is most likely responsible for the observed transitory nature of DI in survivors.
Mortality and functional outcomes
It is important to highlight that we excluded patients deemed unsalvageable or with brain death diagnosis during the first 24 h after admission. As such, mortality in our sample can be lower than that in other reports of patients with severe TBI. Patients with DI during ICU stay had an increased risk of death (OR 4.34 95% CI 1.92–10.11, from multivariate analysis). We found only another study assessing posterior pituitary dysfunction in a similar setting, which showed comparable estimates of the association between DI and mortality (OR 3.96; 95% CI 1.65–9.72, from Hadjizacharia et al. [9]).
Neuroendocrine dysfunction may lead to death, sodium disturbances, hypotension, and vasoactive drugs requirement [9]. Furthermore, treatment of DI may worsen outcomes of patients with severe TBI because of the risk of complications like refractory hypernatremia, fluid overload, seizures, and cerebral edema [25, 26]. Hypernatremia and the hyperosmolar state that accompany DI have several physiological implications, which include neuronal shrinkage, muscle weakness, rhabdomyolysis, decreased ventricular contractility, and impairment in glucose utilization, all of which contribute to increased mortality in the ICU [27]. Systematic loss of diluted water leads to hypovolemic hypernatremia, which usually prompts therapy to maintain volume and perfusion, and explains the high frequency of vasopressors used in DI population compared with non-DI patients (72 vs 38%, p < 0.001). The described phenomena explain the increased mortality and elevated frequency of poor functional outcomes in the group of patients with DI. Also, hypernatremia can be the result of hyperosmolar therapy and act as a marker of severity, cerebral edema, and/or therapy intensity. Hypernatremia occurred in 52 out of 87 patients (59.8%) that received hypertonic saline therapy, compared to 50 out of 228 (21.9%) that did not receive therapeutic hypertonic saline.
Limitations
This study is limited by its single-center retrospective nature. Given that our measurements relied on clinical records, we consider that diagnosis of DI may have been underestimated in our study. Because DI diagnoses were supported by clinical features and laboratory confirmation of hypernatremia and low urine osmolarity, overestimation was unlikely. This differential misclassification would have bias estimation of the effects of DI on outcomes toward the null. Nevertheless, significant associations between DI and outcomes were identified despite of this differential bias, which supports the validity of our findings. Also, given the exclusion criteria of early death used for this study, our mortality measurements may underestimate the mortality associated with the complete spectrum of severe TBI. Finally, while relevant confounders were identified and incorporated into the study, it is possible that unknown confounders and clinician bias could have impacted our results.
Conclusion
Diabetes insipidus in the ICU is a frequent and early complication in patients with severe TBI, and it seems to account for an elevated number of deaths. In survivors, its association with poor functional outcomes is strong. Our results emphasize the importance of detecting DI promptly. Factors associated with the development of this syndrome should be helpful to improve its diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis among patients with severe TBI in the ICU.
References
Roozenbeek B, Maas AIR, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9(4):231–6.
Hyder AA, Wunderlich CA, Puvanachandra P, Gururaj G, Kobusingye OC. The impact of traumatic brain injuries: a global perspective. NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(5):341–53.
Faul M, Xu L, Wald MM, Coronado V, Dellinger AM. Traumatic brain injury in the United States: national estimates of prevalence and incidence, 2002–2006. Inj Prev. 2010;16(Supplement 1):A268–A268268.
Dewan MC, Rattani A, Gupta S, Baticulon RE, Hung YC, Punchak M, et al. Estimating the global incidence of traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 2019;130(4):1080–97.
Ho CH, Liang FW, Wang JJ, Chio CC, Kuo JR. Impact of grouping complications on mortality in traumatic brain injury: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):1–14.
Agha A, Thornton E, O’Kelly P, Tormey W, Phillips J, Thompson CJ. Posterior pituitary dysfunction after traumatic brain injury. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(12):5987–92.
Silva PPB, Bhatnagar S, Herman SD, Zafonte R, Klibanski A, Miller KK, et al. Predictors of hypopituitarism in patients with traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(22):1789–95.
Klose M, Juul A, Poulsgaard L, Kosteljanetz M, Brennum J, Feldt-Rasmussen U. Prevalence and predictive factors of post-traumatic hypopituitarism. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2007;67(2):193–201.
Hadjizacharia P, Beale EO, Inaba K, Chan LS, Demetriades D. Acute diabetes insipidus in severe head injury: a prospective study. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(4):477–84.
Butcher NE, D’Este C, Balogh ZJ. The quest for a universal definition of polytrauma: a trauma registry-based validation study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(4):620–3.
Peng J, Wheeler K, Shi J, Groner JI, Haley KJ, Xiang H. Trauma with injury severity score of 75: are these unsurvivable injuries? PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7):1–11.
Hanley D, Lane K, McBee N, Ziai W, Tuhrim S, Lees K et al. Thrombolytic removal of intraventricular haemorrhage in treatment of severe stroke: results of the randomised, multicentre, multiregion, placebo-controlled CLEAR III trial. Lancet 2017;389(10069):603–11.
Agha A, Sherlock M, Phillips J, Tormey W, Thompson CJ. The natural history of post-traumatic neurohypophysial dysfunction. Eur J Endocrinol. 2005;152(3):371–7.
Capatina C, Paluzzi A, Mitchell R, Karavitaki N. Diabetes insipidus after traumatic brain injury. J Clin Med. 2015;4(7):1448–622.
Schneider HJ, Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Ghigo E, Stalla GK, Agha A. Hypothalamopituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(12):1429–38.
Kreitschmann-Andermahr I, Hoff C, Saller B, Niggemeier S, Pruemper S, Hütter BO, et al. Prevalence of pituitary deficiency in patients after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89(10):4986–92.
Aimaretti G, Ambrosio MR, Di Somma C, Gasperi M, Cannavò S, Scaroni C, et al. Residual pituitary function after brain injury-induced hypopituitarism: a prospective 12-month study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(11):6085–92.
Aimaretti G, Ambrosio MR, Di Somma C, Fusco A, Cannavò S, Gasperi M, et al. Traumatic brain injury and subarachnoid haemorrhage are conditions at high risk for hypopituitarism: screening study at 3 months after the brain injury. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2004;61(3):320–6.
van Lieshout JH, Dibué-Adjei M, Cornelius JF, Slotty PJ, Schneider T, Restin T, et al. An introduction to the pathophysiology of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurg Rev. 2018;41(4):917–30.
Schneider HJ, Schneider M, Saller B, Petersenn S, Uhr M, Husemann B, et al. Prevalence of anterior pituitary insufficiency 3 and 12 months after traumatic brain injury. Eur J Endocrinol. 2006;154(2):259–65.
Bondanelli M, De Marinis L, Ambrosio MR, Monesi M, Valle D, Zatelli MC, et al. Occurrence of pituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2004;21(6):685–96.
Schneider M, Schneider HJ, Yassouridis A, Saller B, von Rosen F, Stalla GK. Predictors of anterior pituitary insufficiency after traumatic brain injury. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2008;68(2):206–12.
Crompton MR. Hypothalamic lesions following closed head injury. Brain. 1971;94(1):165–72.
Salehi F, Kovacs K, Scheithauer BW, Pfeifer EA, Cusimano M. Histologic study of the human pituitary gland in acute traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007;21(6):651–6.
Froelich M, Ni Q, Wess C, Ougorets I, Härtl R. Continuous hypertonic saline therapy and the occurrence of complications in neurocritically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(4):1433–41.
Tan SKR, Kolmodin L, Sekhon MS, Qiao L, Zou J, Henderson WR, et al. Effet d’une perfusion saline hypertonique continue et de l’hypernatrémie sur la mortalité de patients souffrant d’un traumatisme cérébral grave: une étude de cohorte rétrospective. Can J Anesth. 2016;63(6):664–73.
Lindner G, Funk G-C. Hypernatremia in critically ill patients. J Crit Care. 2013;28(2):216.e11–20.
Acknowledgments
None.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency. The study was conducted with resources destined for research at our institution (Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas at Fundación Valle del Lili).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
AG contributed to Protocol and project development, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing. EOG and AHC contributed to Protocol development, data collection, data Analysis, manuscript writing. AMC contributed to Protocol development, data analysis, manuscript editing. JDAM contributed to Protocol/project development, data collection and management, data analysis, manuscript editing. JHMM contributed to Protocol/project development, data management, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval/Informed Consent
Our institutional Research Ethics Committee approved our study protocol, the participation of each author, and oversaw study conduction. No informed consent was required for this study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gempeler, A., Orrego-González, E., Hernandez-Casanas, A. et al. Incidence and Effect of Diabetes Insipidus in the Acute Care of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurocrit Care 33, 718–724 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00955-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-020-00955-x