Abstract
Mast cells (MCs) are portions of the innate and adaptive immune system derived from bone marrow (BM) progenitors that are rich in cytoplasmic granules. MC maturation, phenotype, and function are determined by their microenvironment. MCs accumulate at inflammatory sites associated with atopy, wound healing, and malignancies. They interact with the external environment and are predominantly located in close proximity of blood vessels and sensory nerves. MCs are key initiators and modulators of allergic, anaphylactic, and other inflammatory reactions, by induction of vasodilation, promoting of vascular permeability, recruitment of inflammatory cells, facilitation of adaptive immune responses, and modulation of angiogenesis, and fibrosis. They express a wide range of receptors, e.g., for IgE (FcεRI), IgG (FcγR), stem cell factor (SCF) (KIT receptor or CD117), complement (including C5aR), and cytokines, that upon activation trigger various signaling pathways. The final consequence of such ligand receptor–based activation of MCs is the release of a broad array of mediators which are classified in three categories. While some mediators are preformed and remain stored in granules such as heparin, histamine, and enzymes mainly chymase and tryptase, others are de novo synthesized only after activation including LTB4, LTD4, PDG2, and PAF, and the cytokines IL-10, IL-8, IL-5, IL-3, IL-1, GM-CSF, TGF-β, VEGF, and TNF-α. Depending on the stimulus, MCs calibrate their pattern of mediator release, modulate the amplification of allergic inflammation, and are involved in the resolution of the immune responses. Here, we review recent findings and reports that help to understand the MC biology, pathology, and physiology of diseases with MC involvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Paul Ehrlich was the first who used the term “Mastzellen” when he observed the granular cells in slides obtained from connective tissues and stained with aniline dyes. The German word “Mast” (from the original Greek word μαστόσ = breast) mirrors the nourishing and “suckling” functions of MCs [1]. Using commercial dyes such as dahlia, toluidine blue (the stain of choice widely recommended for MC identification staining MC heparin), methylene blue (thiazine dye staining the anionic residues packed in the MC granules), and neutral red (azine dye), Ehrlich noted metachromatically staining of mature MCs in the connective tissue of several organs [2,3,4,5]. Since their discovery, an extensive understanding of MC biology has been published, which is highlighted in (Fig. 1) [3, 6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. MCs are terminally differentiated, highly distributed through the body, and granular immune cells of BM hematopoietic origin which derive from CD34+/CD117+ progenitor cells. MC progenitors then systemically migrate to target tissues, primarily those with direct contact to environmental antigens including the skin and the mucosal surfaces of the eye, respiratory, and gastrointestinal tracts. MCs complete the final biologic stages of differentiation and maturation in target tissues in the presence of the local growth factors including IL-9, IL-10, IL-3, IL-4, IL-33, CXCL12, nerve growth factor (NGF), and TGF-β [27]. The process of MC development from their progenitors is strictly controlled by microenvironmental stimuli that lead to considerable subtype differences [28]. In humans, MCs are traditionally classified based on the chemical composition of produced serine proteases, tryptase and chymase. MCs containing only tryptase (MCT) predominantly reside in the alveolar septa and the mucosa of the small intestine; MCs containing chymase (MCC) commonly reside in synovial tissue; and MC containing tryptase and chymase (MCTC) are generally found in the skin, submucosal layers of the small intestine, and tonsils. MCs of rodents are classified a slightly different according to their phenotypic properties in two main subsets that have been identified as connective tissue MCs (CTMCs) located in the skin and peritoneal cavity and the mucosal MCs (MMCs) residing in the Lamina propria layer of the intestine [28]. Murine MCs unlike those in human are IL-3 dependent, but SCF independent for growth and expansion [29]. In vivo BM-derived MCs (BMMCs) resemble gastrointestinal mucosa residing MCs (MMCs) when cocultured with IL-3, whereas connective tissue MCs (CTMCs) isolated from the peritoneal cavity are IL-3 and IL-4 dependent. Various immunologically activated resident cells including fibroblasts, T cells, and MCs produce IL-3 and IL-4 providing hematopoietic growth factors for other cell types [30]. Each MC contains approximately 1000 granules in the cytoplasm. The morphology of MCs appears to depend on the anatomical location with sizes ranging from 5 to 20 μm, varying from rounded-shaped to elongated forms, which are typical for perivascular MCs [31]. MCs can be activated via several pathways including aggregation of IgE bound to the FcεRI by polyvalent allergen, other ligand receptor interactions, including C3a-C3aR, C5a-C5aR (CD88), IgG-FcγRI, and NGF-TRKA, and opioid receptors [32].m
Mast Cell Subtypes
MC subtypes have been identified based on function, histochemical staining features, enzymatic content mainly proteases, and pattern of mediator release in response to selected secretagogues [28]. In rodents, MCs are classified as either CTMCs, which can be isolated from the skin, peritoneal cavity, and intestinal submucosa, or MMCs which are predominant in the mucosal layers [33]. CTMCs express a variety of proteases that include mMCP-4, mMCP-5, mMCP-6, mMCP-7, and CPA3, whereas MMCs express mMCP-1 and mMCP-2 [33]. MMCs can also be differentiated by their T cell–mediated expansion in response to certain parasites [28] (Table 1). The main subclasses of MCs in human classified according to protease content include “MCT” that express tryptase only and the “MCTC” that are known for their capability of expressing both tryptase and chymase [40] as well as MC-CPA [41] (Table 2).
Human MCs express γ-tryptase (also known as hTMT) which is a transmembrane tryptase exposed at the cell surface after the cell degranulates the cytoplasmic granules [41]. MC heterogeneity mirrors the experience that they gain in each specific tissue. In addition to the classical tryptases and chymases, resident MCs of various organs express peculiar factors, and release mediators responsible for their tissue-specific functions. For instance, skin MCs have low TLR expression but release carboxypeptidase, while intestinal MCs express α2β7, α2β1, and P2X7, have high TLR expression (in small intestine), and release cysteinyl leukotrienes [46]. Based on the fact that MC heterogeneity is the result of differences in tissue specificity, gene expression programs controlled by microenvironmental factors and stimuli that provoke their activation and/or degranulation, it is suggested to revise the historical classification of these cells according to their protease content [46] toward a classification that better reflects their functional state.
Phylogeny and Lineage Development
The egress of hematopoietic cells into the circulation in an identifiable mature state had secluded the origin of MCs as a mystery for decades. However, owing to advancement in the multicolor flow cytometry technique, and the availability of MC-specific antibodies such as mAb AA4 and mAb BGD6, characterization of the MC progenitors in terms of surface markers development and homing became possible [47,48,49]. Kitamura and coworkers provided the first evidence that MCs derive from progenitors of BM origin, using the beige mouse model (C57BL-Bgj/Bgj). Three-month-old wild-type mice were irradiated and adoptively transferred with BM cells of either beige or wild-type mice. Tissue samples obtained from the caecum and dorsal skin of recipient mice showed that most of the MCs in the caecum were of donor origin, whereas the majority of skin residing MCs were of host origin, indicating that the adoptively transferred BM cells differentiate finally to tissue MCs [50]. Gurish and coworkers demonstrated that MCps in mice are of BM origin by eliminating them with sublethal doses of γ-radiation and reconstitution with syngeneic BM. Since β7 integrin is critical for the trafficking of MCps to the small intestine, they benefited from anti-α4β7 integrin, anti-α4 integrin, anti-β7 integrin, and anti–MAdCAM-1 mAbs to block the recovery of MCps in the small intestine as late as 4 days after BM reconstitution. Applying the strategy of inhibition, they concluded that MCps must arise first in the BM, circulate in the vascular system, and then translocate into the intestine [51]. A “mast cell/basophil-like” (MCBL) cell with cytoplasmic histamine and heparin content was reported in the hemolymph (a fluid equivalent to blood in invertebrate creatures) of Styela plicata, a solitary ascidian that abounds in shallow, protected environments in tropical and warm-temperate oceans best known for possessing a unique allorecognition system [52, 53]), which appeared around 500 million years ago. Later, according to mouse model studies, it was suggested that both MCs and basophils originate from a granulocyte/monocyte progenitor (GMP) cell, which lineage specification is dependent to timed expression of the transcription factors GATA2 and C/EBPα. However, it has also been reported that MCs develop from common myeloid progenitors (CMPs), which are characterized by a lineage phenotype as (LIN) − KIT+ stem cell antigen 1 (SCA1) low FLT3− [54]. In the early 1990s, MCs were known to derive from BM CD34+/FcεRI− progenitors which transiently circulate in the bloodstream as morphologically undifferentiated cells composed of a subset of circulating CD34+/CD117+/Ly−/CD14−/CD17− cells [55]. Most recently, Dahlin et al. reported a human Lin−/CD34hi/CD117int/hi/FcεRI+ CD13−/+/integrin β7−/+ cell subset that gives rise to tryptase-positive granulated MCs expressing both CD117 and FcεRI at a frequency above 70% [56]. Chen et al. reported a cell population, identified as Lin − KIT+Sca-1 − Ly6c − FcεRIα−CD27 − β7 + T1/ST2+, as MCps in adult mouse BM [57]. Their results were consistent with results of Jamur et al. which benefited from applying AA4 and mAb BGD6 mAbs to purify the MCps from mouse BM [49]. In a mouse model investigation based on studying the MCp and mature MCs from peritoneal lavage by flow cytometry, Dahlin et al. reported that once the committed MCps leave the BM, they could be found in circulation as Lin− c-KIThi T1/ST2+ integrin b7hi CD16/32hi cells. After having entered the peripheral tissues, MCps are identified with a CD45+ Lin− CD34+ integrin β7hi FcεRIαlo profile [47]. The experiment strongly suggests that MCps are the progeny of multipotential progenitors (MPPs) other than common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or granulocyte/macrophage progenitors. Furthermore, development of MCs from MPPs does not depend on cell division [58].
Further Mast Cell Surface Receptors and Mediators
A wide range of surface and cytoplasmic receptors make MCs capable of responding to various stimuli. Some of them are quite unusual and yet to be fully investigated. In this regard, the MC population is significantly higher in skin with direct exposure to light when compared with skin which is protected from sun exposure. Moreover ultra violet radiation may induce the MC activation. However, it is still not clear whether attraction of MCs to sun exposed skin or activation by ultraviolet follow a receptor signaling pathway and if so which receptor(s) is involved [59, 60]. Activation of MC expressed chemokine receptors results in chemotaxis and induction of other stimulatory responses. For instance, the activation of CXCR3 and CCR2 promotes the migration of human cord blood MCs (hCBMCs) and induces the signaling events and partial degranulation even without the presence of antigens [61]. Histamine, which is the major mediator of MCs, delivers its biological effects through four receptors (H1–4). The H1 receptors (expressed by endothelial cells, bronchial, smooth muscle, and some neurons) and H2 receptors (expressed by vascular smooth muscle and gastric parietal cells) are associated with pathologic reactions including the wheal and flare reaction in skin, bronchoconstriction, drop in blood pressure, and gastrointestinal hyperactivity. H3 receptors are expressed primarily by the CNS, whereas H4 receptors are histamine receptors expressed on the surface of granulocytes including basophils, MCs, and eosinophils and participate in the process of chemotaxis [62]. The pattern of MCs trafficking depends on their ability to recognize appropriate chemotactic stimuli. Numerous chemoattractants are capable of inducing chemotaxis in MC models [63]. The main chemokine and their corresponding receptors are summarized in Fig. 2. MCs not only store ATP as an autocrine/paracrine factor in their secretory granules but also express P2X receptors, which sense extracellular ATP [64]. MCs may also express inhibitory G protein–coupled receptors including the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR), A2B receptor (the receptor for adenosine), and EP2 (PGE2 receptor) [65] Fig. 2. It should be considered that tissue resident MCs may differ in terms of expressing complement receptors. In this regard, unlike skin MCs, lung MCs do not express the C5a receptor (CD88) [66]. Some recently discovered MC receptors may have therapeutic importance, for instance, sialic acid–binding Ig-like lectins (Siglec) that preferentially bind to α2,8-disialyl and branched α2,6-sialyl carbohydrate structures [67]. Considering that Siglec-8 is expressed selectively on the surface of human eosinophils, MCs, and basophils, it may be a promising molecular target for immunomodulation of diseases [68]. Targeting Siglec-8 may be promising in the treatment of MC-related diseases, including allergic asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis, chronic urticaria, and mastocytosis [69]. Another clinically important receptor is the G protein–coupled MRGPRX2 receptor which is the human analogue of the mouse Mrgprb2. It may be involved in anaphylactoid non-IgE–mediated adverse drug reactions, e.g., to neuromuscular blocking agents used during anesthesia or chinolone antibiotics such as ciprofloxacine [17]. Most recently, MC expression of Mrgpr family has gained attention in dermatology. Meixiong et al., using Mrgprb2−/− mice model, reported that Mrgprb2 deficiency attenuates itch in allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) and that the activation of the receptor is IgE/FcεRI independent and results in non-histaminergic itching. They concluded that targeting Mrgprb2 signaling pathway may have promising therapeutic application [70]. Moreover, Green et al. investigated the involvement of Mrgprb2 in the process of pain by studying Mrgprb2−/− mice in two models of incision and injection of Complete Freund’s Adjuvant (CFA) and found that Mrgprb2 deficiency could reduce the pain hypersensitivity. Interestingly, the P substance/Mrgprb2 receptor interaction plays a role in recruitment of innate immune cells to the site of inflammation [71].
KIT and IgE Signaling
KIT (CD117) belongs to the tyrosine kinase activity superfamily [72, 73]. SCF (first introduced as steel factor and became to be known as KIT ligand later) is synthesized as a transmembrane protein from two alternatively spliced mRNAs which are enzymatically cleaved to soluble or membrane-bound forms [74]. Dimerization of KIT induces activation of the inherent catalytic activity associated with the split tyrosine kinase domain contained within the cytosolic COOH-terminal region [75]. SCF binding to KIT facilitates the formation of a homodimeric state of c-KIT through placing between the Ig-like domain 4/5 of a couple of adjacent monomeric KIT receptors. This leads to trans-phosphorylation in the regions “juxtamembrane,” “kinase insert,” “kinase domain,” and, finally, “COOH-terminal tail.” To trigger the signaling cascade, phosphorylated residues serve as docking sites for surrounding signaling molecules including Src kinases, PI3K, Shc, and phospholipase Cγ (PLCγ). The triggered signalings of GTP exchanger molecule SOS, PI3K, PLCγ, and JAK2 result in activation of Ras-Raf-Map kinase (MAPK) cascade that consequently leads to an increase of the Ca2+ concentration and activation of a number of transcription factors required for the biological function of MCs (Fig.3a). MC activation in type I allergy is mainly triggered by FcεRI when crosslinking of FcεRI allergen–bound IgE occurs [76]. According to the FcεRI structure, the α chain serves as a binding site to IgE. The receptor in addition of α chain has a tetraspanning β chain and two γ chains linked by disulfide bonds. The β subunit effectively boosts the signals induced by IgE/allergen interactions. Additionally, two γ subunits have a role in initiation and conducting of FcεRI downstream signaling [77]. Upon antigen binding, the FcεRI forms dimers. This activation initiates cytoplasmic signaling by rendering “immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs” (ITAMs) phosphorylated in the cytoplasmic ends of the β and γ subunits by engaging the Src-family protein tyrosine kinase Lyn. Syk is bound to ITAMs in the γ units through which it adopts to a spatial conformation susceptible to become phosphorylated by Lyn. Syk promotes the phosphorylation of several targets including TRAPs, LAT, and NTAL. TRAPs after having become phosphorylated act as plasma membrane docking points for binding of cytoplasmic SH2 domain containing molecules mainly Grb2 and “phospholipase Cγ” (PLCγ). The latter molecule after anchoring and becoming activated catalyzes the “phosphatidylinositol 4,5-biphosphate” (PIP2) hydrolysis to form “diacylglycerol” (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5, −triphosphate (IP3) which are mainly known as the second messengers. IP3 binds to its receptors on the “endoplasmic reticulum” (ER) that promotes Ca2+ efflux from the ER. IP3 activates the IP3-receptor on the ER to release Ca2+. The calcium sensor stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) then interacts with the ORAI1 membrane protein opening the CRAC channels allowing the increase in intracellular calcium. The final result of calcium influx is increasing of the free cytoplasmic Ca2+ concentration, which is necessary to trigger further signaling events [78,79,80] (Fig. 3b).
Biogenesis and Degranulation of MC Granules
Following the production of proteins to be secreted into MC cytoplasmic granules, these products are directed to the secretory pathway of the “rough endoplasmic reticulum” (RER). During the passage through the Golgi apparatus, posttranslational modifications occur on the proteins and they reach the “trans-Golgi network” (TGN) [81]. In the following step, a regulated fusion of unit granules is initiated (also called small fusogenic granules) and these granules bud from the trans-Golgi region [82]. Their fusion results in formation of progranules in a defined region by the outermost cisternae of Golgi, RER, and results in mature granules in the cytoplasm. Having left the zone as immature granules (type III granules), the progranules mature via fusing with surrendering immature or mature granules. During “condensation” the volume of the granules is reduced, the contents of the granules become organized, and various sizes of mature granules are generated. Type III granules are capable of fusing with endosomes or lysosomes (type I granules) to form type II granules (secretory lysosomes) [82, 83]. The preformed “secretory granules” (SG) act as degradative and secretory compartments and due to their lysosomal properties contain lysosomal enzymes, present lysosomal membrane proteins, therefore, they possess a low acidic pH, and are regulated by synaptotagmins [84](Fig. 4a). During exocytosis, SGs through a mechanism called compound exocytosis form channels by fusing with each other. The process can proceed either in a multivesicular or sequential pathway. Sequential exocytosis involves the initial fusion of vesicles with the plasma membrane. Next, the vesicles will fuse with the first vesicle. In contrast, multivesicular exocytosis involves vesicles fusing together prior to having interacted with the cell membrane [85]. Additionally, “piecemeal” degranulation is another mechanism of exocytosis through which MCs degranulate. This mechanism is characterized by gradual loss of contents of cytoplasmic granules without distinguishable granule fusion [85]. According to the strength of the degranulating signal, the potency and capacity of exocytosis can be significantly boosted by compound secretion, and further SGs homotypic fusion results in a rapid discharge of SGs located distally, which bypasses the need for their transport to the membrane [84](Fig. 4b). The appropriate fusion of vesicles to the membrane depends on the presence of specific set of highly conserved proteins called “Soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptors” (SNAREs) [85, 86]. Multiple SNARE proteins including VAMP 8, 7, 4, 3, and 2; SNAP23; and syntaxins 6, 4, and 3 are engaged during MC exocytosis [84]. For instance, VAMP-8 deletion results in inhibition of cathepsin D and serotonin release; however, the release of histamine or TNF-α is not influenced by VAMP-8 deletion [87]. Other complexes involved in exocytosis are Rab GTPases that regulate exocytosis; for instance, Rab27a, when accompanied with its effector molecule Munc13–4, increases FcεRI-induced capacity of MC degranulation [32]. Membrane, retrieve upon exocytosis, is a crucial step required for maintaining its integrity by a series of regulated endocytosis. Thus, endocytosis is considered as an essential step in avoiding complete exhaustion of the vesicle system and for maintaining normal MC morphology. Three forms of exocytosis-coupled forms of endocytosis are known in MC biology: slow endocytosis mediated by clathrin (invagination and internalization of the surface membrane coated with clathrin, and then removing of the clathrin), kiss-and-run endocytosis (a proposed mechanism through which vesicles do not fully collapse into the membrane but they recycle just after closure of a fusion pore), and bulk endocytosis [88].
Mast Cell Mediators
MC mediators are traditionally classified as pre-stored and de novo synthesized. The latter are arachidonic acid metabolites produced and released rapidly and cytokines produced and secreted less quickly. (Table 3) The class of mediators stored in granules includes important biologic mediators among them serotonin, histamine, heparin, TNF-α, and enzymes such as tryptase and chymase. De novo synthesized mediators are produced following MC stimulation such as lipid mediators including LTs, PAF, and PGs. Another class of MC cytoplasmic content being released includes cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors such as IL-10, IL-3, IL-8, IL-1, IL-4, IL-5, GM-CSF, TGF-β, VEGF, TNF-α, CCL2, CCL5, fibroblast growth factor (FGF), and platelet-derived growth factors (PDGF). Their release occurs over a period of hours rather than minutes, except for the preformed cytokines including TNF-α due to the possibility of storing and releasing it from cytoplasmic granules [108, 109]. Secretory granules contain many secretory compounds, mainly heparin/chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans with negative charge [33]. Heparin side chains of serglycin, which possess negatively charges, are required for appropriate storage of MC-restricted proteases as they possess positive charges. Additionally, serglycin has a role in regulation of the enzymatic activities of proteases [110]. Tryptases, chymases, and CPA3 are considered as MC-specific proteases but MC granules also possess MC non-specific proteases mainly cathepsin G, MMP9, active caspase3, ADAMTS5, granzyme B, and renin [92]. Among the lipid mediators of MCs, eicosanoids that are synthesized from a common precursor molecule, namely arachidonic acid (AA), play a prominent role [111].
Mast Cell–Deficient Mouse Models for Investigating Mast Cell Biology In Vivo
The proto-oncogene c-KIT is mapped to the dominant “white spotting locus” (W) on mouse chromosome 5. When mutations occur at the “murine-dominant white spotting locus” (W), they may influence biologic functions of variety of cells including the hematopoiesis, proliferation, and migration of primordial germ cells and melanoblasts during the process of embryogenesis. Many independent semidominant mutations have been identified at the W locus. Occurrence of the different alleles is associated with various degree of severity and effect on the different cell lineages [112]. The severity of the phenotypic traits influenced by mutations is in an inverse correlation with the activity of tyrosine kinase receptor [113]. So far, mice with a specific lack of all populations of MCs have not been described yet; instead, mice deficient for KIT have been widely used to analyze the functions of MCs in vivo [114]. According to previously published data, two types of MC-deficient mice have been most frequently used for such studies, namely WBB6F1-KitW/KitW-v and C57BL/6-KitW-sh/KitW-sh mice. The main specifications are listed in (Table 4). The fertility accounts as an advantage for the KitW-sh/KitW-sh mice when researchers wished to produce MC–deficient mice with multiple genetic abnormalities. Additionally, more complex and expensive breeding strategies are required when sterile KitW/KitW-v mice are included in investigations [115]. Differences in biological responses in such mice and wild-type (WT) mice could be due to the presence of any of abnormalities, and not necessarily associated with MC-related deficiencies [117]. In recent years, novel Kit-independent MC-deficient mouse models have been developed and started to be used by many research labs (Table 4). Such models clearly benefit from the lack of Kit-mediated off-target effects, which have to be overcome in the Kit-dependent models by selective MC reconstitution strategies. On the other hand, these mice challenge the investigation of MC biology since their response differ from Kit-dependent mice in various disease models. Nevertheless, these new models open the scene for better mechanistic studies to further explore MC biology in vivo [121, 122].
MC Involvement in Type I Hypersensitivity
MCs were primarily known as the main effector cells in type-I allergic reactions and diseases, e.g., allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, urticaria, and anaphylaxis [123, 124]. The first pathogenic process in the development of IgE-dependent type I allergy is sensitization, which is mediated by allergen uptake by professional antigen presenting cells (APCs, e.g., DCs in mucosa or skin). Immature DCs take up the allergen, mature, and then find their way to regional lymph nodes to present these antigens to naïve T cells which is a necessary step for the differentiation of CD4+ T cells into Th2 cells [125]. Th2 lymphocytes secrete IL-4, which is essential to induce the isotype switching from IgM to IgE class antibodies in B lymphocytes. Once produced by plasma cells, IgE molecules are released into the bloodstream and bind to FcεRI receptors of both tissue resident MCs and circulating basophils. Subsequent allergen binding and crosslinking of IgE molecules already bound to the FcεRI on the surface of the MC trigger MC degranulation and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines responsible for the clinical manifestations of type-I allergic diseases [126, 127]. During the immediate period 0- to 60-min post exposure to the eliciting allergen, MCs become activated through IgE-dependent signaling and the release of preformed mediators, including histamine and tryptase, platelet-activating factor (PAF), and the newly synthesized LTC4, LTD4, LTE4, and PGD2 occurs. The biologic consequence of mediator release in immediate phase of type I hypersensitivity includes local vasodilatation, edema formation, local neurogenic stimulation, and mucus secretion in the early phase [128]. In late phase, a release of IL-1, IL-13, IL-4, and IL-5, as MC inflammatory cytokines, paves the way for activation of local cells and recruitment of inflammatory cells including granulocytic leukocytes (neutrophils, basophils, eosinophils) and agranular leukocytes (monocytes, lymphocytes) to the site of inflammation [129] (Fig. 5).
Beyond an Anaphylaxis-Triggering Cell
Rheumatoid Arthritis
In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), synovial joints are the primary targets of synthesized autoantibodies that are responsible for triggering the auto immune response. MC accumulation and localiziation observed in RA occur in response to local release of several MC-derived mediators. Tryptase when complexing with heparin promotes the inflammatory responses. For instance, it induces the release of neutrophil chemotactic factors mainly IL-1β, IL-17, IL-33, and TNF-α by synovial fibroblasts. IL-33, in turn, promotes the expression of additional inflammatory cytokines and chemokines through acting directly on MCs. Additionally, tryptase/PAR2 interaction activates synovial fibroblasts and enhances their capacity to produce proteases capable of degrading the structure of cartilage and bone [130]. MC-derived mediators including histamine, VEGF, LTs, and PGs have a role in increasing of vascular permeability and angiogenesis. Additionally, mediators such as heparin, MIP-1α, TNF-α, IL-1, histamine, and RANKL are capable of inducing differentiation and activation of osteoclasts that is associated with bone destruction in RA [131, 132]. IL-6 and IFN-γ are able to activate macrophages [131]. (Fig. 6a).
Multiple Sclerosis
In MS, autoreactive T cells become activated in the periphery as aggressive effector cells that infiltrate the CNS. MCs interact with astrocytes (through CD40-CD40L interaction), neurons (through releasing proteases), and T cells for recruiting immune cells and damaging myelinated neurons. Peptidergic neurons modulate MC activity by secreting neuromediators: mainly substance P, which effectively induces histamine release from brain MCs [133]. Histamine released by MCs facilitates the penetration of autoreactive T cells into the CNS through CNS surrounding blood brain barrier (BBB) by alteration of vascular permeability [133]. MCs are capable to recruit inflammatory cells such as neutrophils by secreting TNF-α. Moreover, MC proteases have myelinolytic capacity; in return, some myelin proteins released from damaged myelin sheaths are potent to stimulate MC degranulation [133]. MC chemokines, among these mainly CCL2, CCL3, CCL4, CCL5, and IL-16, enhance T cell recruitment to the site of inflammation [134]. Additionally, MCs acting as APCs activate T cells through presentation of myelin antigens to T cells [135, 136]. In this regard, MCs express a large number of co-stimulatory molecules, including 4-1BB, CD40L, OX40L, CD80, CD86, and CD153, to activate T cells [137] (Fig. 6b).
Cancer and Tumor Progression
The complex role of MCs in shaping tumor microenvironment and interactions with a variety of tumor resident cells such as infiltrating immune cells, and tumor cells and, as well as the extracellular matrix have been investigated [138]. MCs can be recruited to the tumor microenvironment by tumor-derived SCF. In cancer biology, mediators released from MCs are described to be involved in angiogenesis, the growth and survival of tumor cells, invasion, and metastasis [139]. In a tumor with MC-remodeled microenvironment, NF-κB and AP-1 have intensified activity. Additionally, suppression of T cells and natural killer (NK) cells is exacerbated in such a microenvironment [140]. Among the cytokines contributing to tumor inflammation, TNF-α, IL-6, VEGF, iNOS, Cox-2, and MMP-9 can be produced by MCs [140]. Histamine may have a modulatory role in the chronic inflammatory responses associated with developing neoplasms through having interaction with its four G protein–coupled receptors. Histamine by acting via H1R regulates T cell polarization, in favor of enhancing Th1 responses. Additionally, while acting via H2R, histamine inhibits both Th1 and Th2 responses. Moreover, MC-released histamine plays a role in MC/peripheral monocytes interactions through acting on monocyte expressed H2R. Histamine also promotes IL-10 production and reduces the secretion of IL-12, and polarizes the skewness of engaged naive CD4+ T cells toward a Th2 phenotype [139]. Tryptase activates latent MMPs that is associated with the ECM degradation, vascular tube formation, and release of angiogenic compounds [141]. MCs-Treg cells crosstalk through the OX40/OX40 ligand (OX40L) axis to inhibit histamine release in anaphylactic reactions. In the presence of IL-6, MCs can revert Treg cell suppressive activity triggering OX40 on their membrane and promote Treg cells into pro-inflammatory cells which produce IL-17 [139]. It should be considered that Tregs may have a different profile of released cytokines in different models of cancers, thus may act in favor of suppressing the anti-tumor responses or support pro-inflammatory responses. For example, adenomatous polyp resident Tregs shift their production of IL-10 to IL-17 [142]. The interaction between MCs and MDSCs with CD14 + CD19 + HLA-DR−/low phenotype is thought to shape an immunosuppressive microenvironment at least in patients suffering from colon cancer and melanoma. MDSC-derived IL-17 actively recruits IL-9 producing Treg cells that provide IL-9 for the survival of tumor resident MCs [143]. The SCF produced by tumor cells not only acts as a survival factor for MCs but even promotes the production of MCs MMP-9 by these cells. MMP-9 is capable of clipping the membrane-bound SCF expressed by tumor cell that consequently promotes bioavailability of SCF. Tryptase when secreted from activated MCs enhances the activity of tumor cell COX through interacting with the PAR-2 receptors. In return, COX mediates the production of PGE-2 and activates MCs to secrete VEGF that induces the tumor angiogenesis [144] (Fig. 7a).
Wound Healing
MCs also participate in overlapping phases of wound healing including inflammation, proliferation, and remodeling [145]. Injury is capable of triggering MC activation after which release of preformed or de novo synthesized mediators occurs [145]. MC-derived histamine induces capillary permeability and vasodilation that promote neutrophil influx to the site. MC released vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and IL-6 and IL-8 also have vasoactive bioactivity [146]. Tryptase binding to PAR2 on endothelial cells causes vasodilatation that facilitates the infiltration of neutrophils and other inflammatory mediators into the injury site [147]. During the proliferative stage, keratinocytes attract MCs toward the epidermis by releasing SCF. Histamine and tryptase stimulate dermal fibroblasts to release growth factors including FGF-2 or FGF-7, respectively [103]. MCs are able to promote the fibroblast proliferation via releasing VEGF, IL-4, and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) [148, 149]. Owing to chemotactic and mitogenic effects of tryptase on fibroblasts, MCs interact actively with them and participate in fibroblast biological functions mainly synthesis of collagen, contraction, and terminally differentiation into myofibroblasts [81]. MC mediators including IL-8, IL-4, NGF, FGF-2, PDGF, TGF-β, and VEGF participate in neo-angiogenesis, fibrinogenesis, or re-epithelization, the biological functions and processes required to proceed and finalize the wound repair [150, 151] (Fig. 7b).
MCs Crosstalk with Immune Cells
Interaction with the Innate Immune System
MCs have crosstalk with myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and support not only their mobilization and infiltration into the tumor but also promote their ability to produce IL-17. MDSCs, in turn, attract Tregs and stimulate them to produce IL-9, a survival factor for MCs [152]. MC-released histamine induces MDSC activation, proliferation, and IL-4 and IL-13 production through acting on MDSC surface–expressed H1R and H2R receptors. This enhanced cytokine production results in the skewing of immune responses toward Th2 which supports occurrence of allergic events [153]. MCs and DCs gather around environmental interfaces and MC-derived soluble promote DC activation, migration to lymph nodes, and facilitate the process of Th2 polarization. Recently, Carroll-Portillo et al. reported a direct intercellular crosstalk through an immunological synapse between MCs and DCs. A formation of synapses promotes the exchange of MC internalized–specific antigen and transfer it to surrounding DCs to be processed and presented to T cells for the purpose of their activation [154]. MC-derived IL-10 reduces DC migration, maturation, and activation while it enhances DCs ability of reducing T cell proliferation and cytokine production by downregulation of co-stimulatory molecule expression by DCs [98]. MCs released TNF-α and IL-1 promote DC migration and maturation; furthermore, cytokines including IL-18 and IL-16, CCL5, and PGE2 facilitate DC migration [155]. MC-derived TNF-α and IL-6 are involved in monocyte and macrophage activation and the local recruitment of neutrophils [156]. MC-derived IL-10 is potent to suppress the cytokine production by monocytes [98]. Upon LPS stimulation through TLR4/MyD88 signaling pathway, MCs and macrophages release CXCL1 and CXCL2 capable of binding to CXCR2 receptor through which they recruit neutrophils to the site [157]. MC-released MCP-6, tryptase β2, and IL-5 are potent to recruit eosinophils [158]. A major role of MCs in innate immunity is to enhance the local recruitment of neutrophils by secreting TNF-α, which can either enhance host resistance or contribute to pathology [159]. Additionally, MC-derived mMCP-6 contributes to the recruitment of neutrophils to sites of bacterial infection [40]. MC interactions with ILCs include the production of PGD2 by MCs through which they promote the chemotaxis of ILC2s. Moreover, MCs upon becoming activated via IgE/FcεRI signaling or in response to extracellular ATP release IL-33 which induces the production of IL-13 by ILCs. The latter cytokine contributes to the restriction of helminth infection. MCs, after becoming activated by IL-9 from IL-33-elicited ILC2s, produce IL-2, which in return promotes the expansion of CD25+ ILC2 population [160] (Fig. 8).
Interaction with the Adaptive Immune System
MCs have surface expression of both MHC I and II molecules, and by having interaction with T cell–expressed TCRs, they induce antigen-specific clonal expansion of T cells [8]. Having direct interaction with CD4+ T cells via MHC II and OX40L and also releasing TNF-α, MCs augment their own activation, proliferation, and cytokine secretion (e.g., IL-22, IFN-γ) [8]. MCs promote the recruitment of CD8+ T cells by releasing CCL5 and LTB4 [8]. Tregs promote MCp recruitment to the lung during allergic inflammation, while Treg-derived IL-9 promotes recruitment of MCs into transplanted allografts, important for maintaining allograft tolerance [161]. Engagement of OX40L (expressed on MCs) and OX40 (expressed on Tregs) [152] is a mechanism through which Treg can suppress IgE-mediated MC degranulation [162]. Additionally, IL-10 and TGF-β secreted by Tregs have been shown to inhibit the FcεRI expression by MCs [163]. Moreover, MC-derived TGF-β contributes to generation of Tregs [106]. MCs augment IgE production of B cells by releasing IL-13 and IL-4 and expressing CD40L [98] (Fig. 8).
Mast Cells and Host Defense
Mast Cell Recognition of Microbial Infection
MCs express a broad range of cell surface receptors. These receptors are actively involved in the detection of harmful pathogenic microorganisms including viruses, parasites (mainly helminths), and bacteria. MCs respond to pathogens after detecting them by releasing mediators including TNF-α, LTs, and proteases as well as recruiting immune cells mainly neutrophils and DCs. MCs respond to microbial structures and products by recognizing PAMPs by the help of “pattern recognition receptors” (PRR). The main classes of PRRs are (1) “Toll-like receptors” (TLRs) which are expressed on plasma membrane or membrane of cytoplasmic endosomes and (2) the cytoplasmic “nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain” (NOD)-like receptor (NLRs) [62]. TLRs are defined as type-I transmembrane proteins possessing ectodomains containing leucine-rich repeats, which enable them to recognize the PAMPS and DAMPs. Over time, TLR1 to TLR9 conserved their structure in both mice and humans. However, in mice, TLR-10 is nonfunctional due to the presence of a retroviral insertion. TLR-11, TLR-12, and TLR-13 have not yet been determined in humans. TLR1, TLR-2, TLR-4, TLR-5, TLR-6, and TLR-10 are known to be widely expressed on the plasma membrane, while TLR3, TLR-7, TLR-8, TLR-9, TLR-11, TLR-12, and TLR-13 are expressed in the endosome [164]. TLRs are able to bind to diverse molecular structures, including lipids (TLR4: LPS via MD2; TLR2: lipoproteins), proteins (TLR5: flagellin; TLR2 and TLR4: HMGB1), and nucleic acids (TLR3: dsRNA; TLR7/8: ssRNA; and TLR9: unmethylated CpG motifs in bacterial, viral, and fungal DNA) [165]. Generally, the strength of signal generated by engaging TLRs is below the threshold needed for triggering calcium flux and granule exocytosis in MCs, except TLR2 [166]. TLR2 (through inducing the production of IL-6) and TLR4 signaling is significantly dominant in MC-mediated immune responses against bacteria. Interestingly, “lipopolysaccharide” (LPS)-TLR4 interaction has been shown to stimulate rodent MCs and promoting the cytokine production without occurrence of degranulation. In contrast to TLR-4, stimulation of MCs through TLR2 peptidoglycan interaction induces both degranulation and cytokine production [167]. MCs benefit largely from a wide range of proteins including immunoglobulins, complement components, and surfactant lipoproteins, which serve as opsonins to indirectly recognize and interact with bacteria [168].
Mast Cells and Defense Against Bacterial Infection
In addition to recognizing bacteria, MCs can recognize and respond to other dangers such as toxins. For instance, binding the Vibrio cholerae toxin-Ganglioside GM1 selectively promotes IL-6 production, while hampering the production of other mediators. Another example is Clostridium difficile toxin that induces MC degranulation after binding neurokinin-1 [168]. During bacterial infection, MCs are activated by engaging complement receptors (CRs), capable of being directly activated by bacterial products and expressed molecules including CD48 (bacterial expressed FimH receptor) [169]. Carlos et al. reported that MC activation results in acquiring resistance during infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Their studied TLR2−/− mice showed increased mycobacterial load, deficient recruitment of myeloid cells, and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Adoptive transfer of TLR2+/+ MCs could effectively correct the susceptibility of TLR2-deficient mice to MTB infection [170]. MC-derived TNF-α is an effective neutrophil recruiting mediator to infection sites. Interestingly, MCs play an active role in antibacterial defense possessing bactericidal activity (e.g., by releasing cathelicidins or proteases). MC proteases have been reported to play a role in the control of gut infections. Mouse tryptase mMCP6 (but not the related protease mMCP7) attracts neutrophils when injected into the peritoneal cavity. Moreover, Mcpt6 −/− mice clear Klebsiella pneumoniae inefficiently and are more likely than +/+ mice to die following an injection of K. pneumoniae into the peritoneal cavity [93]. Following intranasal/intraperitoneal inoculation with K. pneumoniae, IL-6−/− mice are less likely to survive than wild-type controls. At the time of death, IL-6−/− mice were found to have higher bacterial load but not inflammatory cells in lungs and peritoneum [171]. Junkins et al. used MC-deficient KitW-sh/KitW-sh mice model to investigate the MCs capability in microbial defense against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. They found MC-deficient mice with greatly increased bacterial dissemination, epithelial permeability, and neutrophil load when compared with WT control group after P. aeruginosa infection. In their study, MCs were shown to reduce P. aeruginosa–mediated epithelial cell apoptosis and TNF production by epithelial cells [172]. Investigation of MCs involvement in skin immune defense in lesions induced by P. aeruginosa in MC-deficient KitW/KitW-v mice, normal Kit+/+ mice, and MC-reconstituted KitW/KitW-v mice suggested endothelin-1 as a possible mediator to induce activation of MCs to augment neutrophil recruitment to infection sites and therefore bacterial clearance [173].
Mast Cells and Defense Against Viral Infection and Toxins
In the context of viral infection, the TLR3-dependent activation of MCs by viruses hampers their capacity to attach to fibronectin and vitronectin. Additionally, TLR3 activation abrogates MC attachment–dependent potentiation of IgE-mediated responses. MCs produce type I IFNs in response to engaging endosomal TLR3 upon exposure to double-stranded RNA [169]. Moreover, exposure to gp120 envelope protein of HIV promotes IL-4 and IL-13 production by MCs [169]. It has been proposed that MCs in HIV/AIDS act as inducible reservoirs of infectious viral clones. Gp120 is capable of activating MCs and basophils, via IgE binding to FcεRI. Consequently, a Th2-dominated response is generated that may downregulate the protective anti-viral immune responses [174]. MCs produce IFN in response to viral infection when stimulated through TLR3 and can modulate T cell responses to viral infections [175]. MC-derived TNF-α and IL-6 are able to protect mice from HSV-induced mortality. This has been reported after intradermal injection with HSV-2 into MC-deficient KitW/KitW-v mice [176]. Various microbes employ distinct mechanisms to suppress the role of MCs in host defense. For instance, the ES-62 protein, secreted by nematodes, is able to degrade PKC-α, an intermediate molecule in MC-activating cascade. M. Toxoplasma employs unknown factors to suppress MC degranulation by inhibition of signaling through tyrosine phosphorylation [177]. MCs may also play a protective role. In mouse models, MCs can protect from envenomation from bee [178] and scorpion stings, and snake bites [179]. For instance, MC-Carboxypeptidase 3 can degrade the snake venom toxin safarotoxin [109].
Conclusion
MCs, tissue-localized cells of hematopoietic origin, are best known for their harmful effects when eliciting immediate hypersensitivity reactions. However, in recent times, they have gained attention as major effector cells in numerous other pathological but also physiological situations. Owing to the expression of a variety of receptors and a wide spectrum of mediators, MCs play a role in many inflammatory diseases, tissue remodeling, and anti-tumor immune responses. Moreover, they continue to play a crucial role in anti-microbial defense and tissue repair mechanisms due to their anatomical distribution at sites that exhibit direct interaction with the surrounding environment. The current knowledge of MC biology is based on four techniques, namely (1) transgenic and mutant mice, (2) human and mouse MC lines, (3) MC targeting antibodies, and (4) pharmacological strategies to modulate MC activation or mediator effects. Current insights into the role of MCs in the pathophysiology of variety of MC-involved diseases are mostly gained through investigations on animal models and the extension of these roles to human diseases requires further cellular and molecular investigations. According to the complexity of immune responses orchestrated by MCs due to expression of variety of receptors some of which have recently determined, and the differences in degranulation profile of MCs subsets in response to different stimuli, it should be considered that implying the in vitro laboratory results to clinically significant disorders needs further investigation to avoid any unwanted extrapolation.
Abbreviations
- BM:
-
Bone marrow
- CM:
-
Cutaneous mastocytosis
- DAMPs:
-
Damage-associated molecular patterns
- HCMCs:
-
Human cultured mast cells
- JAK:
-
Janus kinase
- LAT:
-
Linker for activator of T cells
- LT:
-
Leukotriene
- MC:
-
Mast cell
- MCp:
-
Mast cell progenitor
- NGF:
-
Nerve growth factor
- PAMPs:
-
Pathogen-associated molecular patterns
- PAR2:
-
Protease-activated receptor2
- PG:
-
Prostaglandin
- RER:
-
Rough endoplasmic reticulum
- SCF:
-
Stem cell factor
- SG:
-
Secretory granules
- SM:
-
Systemic mastocytosis
- SM-AHNMD:
-
SM with associated clonal hematological non–mast cell lineage disease
- Syk:
-
Spleen tyrosine kinase
- VEGF:
-
Vascular endothelial growth factor
References
Crivellato E, Beltrami C, Mallardi F, Ribatti D (2003) Paul Ehrlich’s doctoral thesis: a milestone in the study of mast cells. Br J Haematol 123(1):19–21
Seneviratne SL, Maitland A (2017) Mast cell disorders in. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome 175(1):226–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.c.31555
Friberg U, Graf W, Aberg B (1951) On the histochemistry of the mast cells. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 29(2):197–202
Leclere M, Desnoyers M, Beauchamp G, Lavoie JP (2006) Comparison of four staining methods for detection of mast cells in equine bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. J Vet Intern Med 20(2):377–381
Muller T (1994) Supravital uptake of cationic dyes by mast cell granules: a light and electron microscope study. Biotech Histochem Off Publ Biol Stain Comm 69(3):171–176
Goldstein SM, Kaempfer CE, Kealey JT, Wintroub BU (1989) Human mast cell carboxypeptidase. Purification and characterization. J Clin Invest 83(5):1630–1636. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci114061
Gibson S, Miller HR (1986) Mast cell subsets in the rat distinguished immunohistochemically by their content of serine proteinases. Immunology 58(1):101–104
Bulfone-Paus S, Bahri R (2015) Mast cells as regulators of T cell responses. Front Immunol 6:394. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00394
Beaven MA (2009) Our perception of the mast cell from Paul Ehrlich to now. Eur J Immunol 39(1):11–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.200838899
Kinet JP (1999) The high-affinity IgE receptor (fc epsilon RI): from physiology to pathology. Annu Rev Immunol 17:931–972. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.17.1.931
Frandji P, Tkaczyk C, Oskeritzian C, David B, Desaymard C, Mecheri S (1996) Exogenous and endogenous antigens are differentially presented by mast cells to CD4+ T lymphocytes. Eur J Immunol 26(10):2517–2528. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.1830261036
Yarden Y, Kuang WJ, Yang-Feng T, Coussens L, Munemitsu S, Dull TJ, Chen E, Schlessinger J, Francke U, Ullrich A (1987) Human proto-oncogene c-kit: a new cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase for an unidentified ligand. EMBO J 6(11):3341–3351
Williams DE, Eisenman J, Baird A, Rauch C, Van Ness K, March CJ, Park LS, Martin U, Mochizuki DY, Boswell HS et al (1990) Identification of a ligand for the c-kit proto-oncogene. Cell 63(1):167–174
Nagata H, Worobec AS, Oh CK, Chowdhury BA, Tannenbaum S, Suzuki Y, Metcalfe DD (1995) Identification of a point mutation in the catalytic domain of the protooncogene c-kit in peripheral blood mononuclear cells of patients who have mastocytosis with an associated hematologic disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92(23):10560–10564
Grimbaldeston MA, Chen CC, Piliponsky AM, Tsai M, Tam SY, Galli SJ (2005) Mast cell-deficient W-sash c-kit mutant Kit W-sh/W-sh mice as a model for investigating mast cell biology in vivo. Am J Pathol 167(3):835–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9440(10)62055-x
Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, Ohno S, Segal GM, Fanning S, Zimmermann J, Lydon NB (1996) Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med 2(5):561–566
McNeil BD, Pundir P, Meeker S, Han L, Undem BJ, Kulka M, Dong X (2015) Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature 519(7542):237–241. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14022
Ginsburg H, Lagunoff D (1967) The in vitro differentiation of mast cells. Cultures of cells from immunized mouse lymph nodes and thoracic duct lymph on fibroblast monolayers. J Cell Biol 35(3):685–697
Ishizaka K, Ishizaka T, Hornbrook MM (1966) Physicochemical properties of reaginic antibody. V. Correlation of reaginic activity wth gamma-E-globulin antibody. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 97(6):840–853
Kirshenbaum AS, Goff JP, Semere T, Foster B, Scott LM, Metcalfe DD (1999) Demonstration that human mast cells arise from a progenitor cell population that is CD34(+), c-kit(+), and expresses aminopeptidase N (CD13). Blood 94(7):2333–2342
Young JD, Liu CC, Butler G, Cohn ZA, Galli SJ (1987) Identification, purification, and characterization of a mast cell-associated cytolytic factor related to tumor necrosis factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84(24):9175–9179
Nakano T, Sonoda T, Hayashi C, Yamatodani A, Kanayama Y, Yamamura T, Asai H, Yonezawa T, Kitamura Y, Galli SJ (1985) Fate of bone marrow-derived cultured mast cells after intracutaneous, intraperitoneal, and intravenous transfer into genetically mast cell-deficient W/Wv mice. Evidence that cultured mast cells can give rise to both connective tissue type and mucosal mast cells. J Exp Med 162(3):1025–1043
Edwards AM (2005) The discovery of cromolyn sodium and its effect on research and practice in allergy and immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol 115(4):885–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2005.01.063
Dudeck A, Dudeck J, Scholten J, Petzold A, Surianarayanan S, Kohler A, Peschke K, Vohringer D, Waskow C, Krieg T, Muller W, Waisman A, Hartmann K, Gunzer M, Roers A (2011) Mast cells are key promoters of contact allergy that mediate the adjuvant effects of haptens. Immunity 34(6):973–984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.028
Otsuka A, Kubo M, Honda T, Egawa G, Nakajima S, Tanizaki H, Kim B, Matsuoka S, Watanabe T, Nakae S, Miyachi Y, Kabashima K (2011) Requirement of interaction between mast cells and skin dendritic cells to establish contact hypersensitivity. PLoS One 6(9):e25538. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025538
Lilla JN, Chen CC, Mukai K, BenBarak MJ, Franco CB, Kalesnikoff J, Yu M, Tsai M, Piliponsky AM, Galli SJ (2011) Reduced mast cell and basophil numbers and function in Cpa3-Cre; mcl-1fl/fl mice. Blood 118(26):6930–6938. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-03-343962
Reber LL, Sibilano R, Mukai K, Galli SJ (2015) Potential effector and immunoregulatory functions of mast cells in mucosal immunity. Mucosal Immunol 8(3):444–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/mi.2014.131
Gri G, Frossi B, D’Inca F, Danelli L, Betto E, Mion F, Sibilano R, Pucillo C (2012) Mast cell: an emerging partner in immune interaction. Front Immunol 3:120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00120
Gilfillan AM, Austin SJ, Metcalfe DD (2011) Mast cell biology: introduction and overview. Adv Exp Med Biol 716:2–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9533-9_1
Nocka K, Buck J, Levi E, Besmer P (1990) Candidate ligand for the c-kit transmembrane kinase receptor: KL, a fibroblast derived growth factor stimulates mast cells and erythroid progenitors. EMBO J 9(10):3287–3294
Campillo-Navarro M, Chavez-Blanco AD, Wong-Baeza I, Serafin-Lopez J, Flores-Mejia R, Estrada-Parra S, Estrada-Garcia I, Chacon-Salinas R (2014) Mast cells in lung homeostasis: beyond type I hypersensitivity. Current Respiratory Medicine Reviews 10(2):115–123. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573398x10666141024220151
Kalesnikoff J, Galli SJ (2008) New developments in mast cell biology. Nat Immunol 9(11):1215–1223. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.f.216
Ronnberg E, Melo FR, Pejler G (2012) Mast cell proteoglycans. J Histochem Cytochem Off J Histochem Soc 60(12):950–962. https://doi.org/10.1369/0022155412458927
Vogel P, Janke L, Gravano DM, Lu M, Sawant DV, Bush D, Shuyu E, Vignali DAA, Pillai A, Rehg JE (2018) Globule leukocytes and other mast cells in the mouse intestine. Vet Pathol 55(1):76–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300985817705174
Metcalfe DD, Baram D, Mekori YA (1997) Mast cells. Physiol Rev 77(4):1033–1079. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1997.77.4.1033
Nakahata T, Kobayashi T, Ishiguro A, Tsuji K, Naganuma K, Ando O, Yagi Y, Tadokoro K, Akabane T (1986) Extensive proliferation of mature connective-tissue type mast cells in vitro. Nature 324(6092):65–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/324065a0
Tsuji K, Nakahata T, Takagi M, Kobayashi T, Ishiguro A, Kikuchi T, Naganuma K, Koike K, Miyajima A, Arai K et al (1990) Effects of interleukin-3 and interleukin-4 on the development of “connective tissue-type” mast cells: interleukin-3 supports their survival and interleukin-4 triggers and supports their proliferation synergistically with interleukin-3. Blood 75(2):421–427
Enerback L, Lundin PM (1974) Ultrastructure of mucosal mast cells in normal and compound 48-80-treated rats. Cell Tissue Res 150(1):95–105
Okabe T, Hide M, Hiragun T, Morita E, Koro O, Yamamoto S (2006) Bone marrow derived mast cell acquire responsiveness to substance P with ca(2+) signals and release of leukotriene B(4) via mitogen-activated protein kinase. J Neuroimmunol 181(1–2):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2006.07.011
Galli SJ, Borregaard N, Wynn TA (2011) Phenotypic and functional plasticity of cells of innate immunity: macrophages, mast cells and neutrophils. Nat Immunol 12(11):1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni.2109
Pejler G, Abrink M, Ringvall M, Wernersson S (2007) Mast cell proteases. Adv Immunol 95:167–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2776(07)95006-3
Irani AM, Bradford TR, Kepley CL, Schechter NM, Schwartz LB (1989) Detection of MCT and MCTC types of human mast cells by immunohistochemistry using new monoclonal anti-tryptase and anti-chymase antibodies. J Histochem Cytochem Off J Histochem Soc 37(10):1509–1515. https://doi.org/10.1177/37.10.2674273
Schwartz LB, Irani AM, Roller K, Castells MC, Schechter NM (1987) Quantitation of histamine, tryptase, and chymase in dispersed human T and TC mast cells. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 138(8):2611–2615
Oliani SM, Vugman I, Jamur MC (1993) Ultrastructural similarity between bat and human mast cell secretory granules. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 100(3):230–233. https://doi.org/10.1159/000236416
Weidner N, Austen KF (1991) Ultrastructural and immunohistochemical characterization of normal mast cells at multiple body sites. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology 96(3):26S–30S discussion 30S-31S
Frossi B, Mion F, Sibilano R, Danelli L, Pucillo CEM (2018) Is it time for a new classification of mast cells? What do we know about mast cell heterogeneity? Immunol Rev 282(1):35–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12636
Dahlin JS, Ding Z, Hallgren J (2015) Distinguishing mast cell progenitors from mature mast cells in mice. Stem Cells Dev 24(14):1703–1711. https://doi.org/10.1089/scd.2014.0553
Guiraldelli MF, Franca CN, de Souza DA Jr, da Silva EZ, Toso VD, Carvalho CC, Jamur MC, Oliver C (2013) Rat embryonic mast cells originate in the AGM. PLoS One 8(3):e57862. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057862
Jamur MC, Moreno AN, Mello LF, Souza Junior DA, Campos MR, Pastor MV, Grodzki AC, Silva DC, Oliver C (2010) Mast cell repopulation of the peritoneal cavity: contribution of mast cell progenitors versus bone marrow derived committed mast cell precursors. BMC Immunol 11:32. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2172-11-32
Kitamura Y, Shimada M, Hatanaka K, Miyano Y (1977) Development of mast cells from grafted bone marrow cells in irradiated mice. Nature 268(5619):442–443
Gurish MF, Tao H, Abonia JP, Arya A, Friend DS, Parker CM, Austen KF (2001) Intestinal mast cell progenitors require CD49dbeta7 (alpha4beta7 integrin) for tissue-specific homing. J Exp Med 194(9):1243–1252
Oren M, Escande ML, Paz G, Fishelson Z, Rinkevich B (2008) Urochordate histoincompatible interactions activate vertebrate-like coagulation system components. PLoS One 3(9):e3123. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003123
Raftos DA, Tait NN, Briscoe DA (1987) Cellular basis of allograft rejection in the solitary urochordate, Styela plicata. Dev Comp Immunol 11(4):713–725
Voehringer D (2013) Protective and pathological roles of mast cells and basophils. Nat Rev Immunol 13(5):362–375. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3427
Arock M (2016) Mast cell differentiation: still open questions? Blood 127(4):373–374. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-12-686592
Dahlin JS, Malinovschi A, Ohrvik H, Sandelin M (2016) Lin-CD34hi CD117int/hi FcepsilonRI+ cells in human blood constitute a rare population of mast cell progenitors. Blood 127(4):383–391. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-06-650648
Okayama Y, Kawakami T (2006) Development, migration, and survival of mast cells. Immunol Res 34(2):97–115. https://doi.org/10.1385/ir:34:2:97
Xu Y, Chen G (2015) Mast cell and autoimmune diseases. Mediat Inflamm 2015:246126. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/246126
Grimbaldeston MA, Simpson A, Finlay-Jones JJ, Hart PH (2003) The effect of ultraviolet radiation exposure on the prevalence of mast cells in human skin. Br J Dermatol 148(2):300–306. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2003.05113.x
Kim MS, Kim YK, Lee DH, Seo JE, Cho KH, Eun HC, Chung JH (2009) Acute exposure of human skin to ultraviolet or infrared radiation or heat stimuli increases mast cell numbers and tryptase expression in human skin in vivo. Br J Dermatol 160(2):393–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08838.x
Migalovich-Sheikhet H, Friedman S, Mankuta D, Levi-Schaffer F (2012) Novel identified receptors on mast cells. Front Immunol 3:238. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00238
Gilfillan AM, Beaven MA (2011) Regulation of mast cell responses in health and disease. Crit Rev Immunol 31(6):475–529
Halova I, Draberova L, Draber P (2012) Mast cell chemotaxis - chemoattractants and signaling pathways. Front Immunol 3:119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00119
Bulanova E, Bulfone-Paus S (2010) P2 receptor-mediated signaling in mast cell biology. Purinergic Signal 6(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11302-009-9173-z
Stone KD, Prussin C, Metcalfe DD (2010) IgE, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol 125(2 Suppl 2):S73–S80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.017
Kulka M, Metcalfe DD (2010) Isolation of tissue mast cells. Current protocols in immunology Chapter 7:Unit 7.25. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471142735.im0725s90
Mizrahi S, Gibbs BF, Karra L, Ben-Zimra M, Levi-Schaffer F (2014) Siglec-7 is an inhibitory receptor on human mast cells and basophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol 134(1):230–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.031
O’Sullivan JA, Carroll DJ, Cao Y, Salicru AN, Bochner BS (2017) Leveraging Siglec-8 endocytic mechanisms to kill human eosinophils and malignant mast cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.06.028
Kiwamoto T, Kawasaki N, Paulson JC, Bochner BS (2012) Siglec-8 as a drugable target to treat eosinophil and mast cell-associated conditions. Pharmacol Ther 135(3):327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2012.06.005
Meixiong J, Anderson M, Limjunyawong N, Sabbagh MF, Hu E, Mack MR, Oetjen LK, Wang F, Kim BS, Dong X (2019) Activation of mast-cell-expressed mas-related G-protein-coupled receptors drives non-histaminergic itch. Immunity 50(5):1163–1171.e1165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.013
Green DP, Limjunyawong N, Gour N, Pundir P, Dong X (2019) A mast-cell-specific receptor mediates neurogenic inflammation and pain. Neuron 101(3):412–420.e413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.012
Frieri M, Patel R, Celestin J (2013) Mast cell activation syndrome: a review. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 13(1):27–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11882-012-0322-z
Blechman JM, Lev S, Givol D, Yarden Y (1993) Structure-function analyses of the kit receptor for the steel factor. Stem Cells (Dayton, Ohio) 11(Suppl 2):12–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/stem.5530110804
Besmer P, Manova K, Duttlinger R, Huang EJ, Packer A, Gyssler C, Bachvarova RF (1993) The kit-ligand (steel factor) and its receptor c-kit/W: pleiotropic roles in gametogenesis and melanogenesis. Development (Cambridge, Engl) Supplement:125–137
Gilfillan AM, Rivera J (2009) The tyrosine kinase network regulating mast cell activation. Immunol Rev 228(1):149–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00742.x
Alvarez-Errico D, Lessmann E, Rivera J (2009) Adapters in the organization of mast cell signaling. Immunol Rev 232(1):195–217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00834.x
Silveira ESAM, Mazucato VM, Jamur MC, Oliver C (2011) Lipid rafts in mast cell biology. J Lipids 2011:752906. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/752906
Blank U, Rivera J (2004) The ins and outs of IgE-dependent mast-cell exocytosis. Trends Immunol 25(5):266–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2004.03.005
Draber P, Sulimenko V, Draberova E (2012) Cytoskeleton in mast cell signaling. Front Immunol 3:130. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00130
Siraganian RP, de Castro RO, Barbu EA, Zhang J (2010) Mast cell signaling: the role of protein tyrosine kinase Syk, its activation and screening methods for new pathway participants. FEBS Lett 584(24):4933–4940. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2010.08.006
Blank U, Madera-Salcedo IK, Danelli L, Claver J, Tiwari N, Sanchez-Miranda E, Vazquez-Victorio G, Ramirez-Valadez KA, Macias-Silva M, Gonzalez-Espinosa C (2014) Vesicular trafficking and signaling for cytokine and chemokine secretion in mast cells. Front Immunol 5:453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00453
Moon TC, Befus AD, Kulka M (2014) Mast cell mediators: their differential release and the secretory pathways involved. Front Immunol 5:569. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2014.00569
Hammel I, Lagunoff D, Galli SJ (2010) Regulation of secretory granule size by the precise generation and fusion of unit granules. J Cell Mol Med 14(7):1904–1916. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01071.x
Azouz NP, Hammel I, Sagi-Eisenberg R (2014) Characterization of mast cell secretory granules and their cell biology. DNA Cell Biol 33(10):647–651. https://doi.org/10.1089/dna.2014.2543
Lorentz A, Baumann A, Vitte J, Blank U (2012) The SNARE machinery in mast cell secretion. Front Immunol 3:143. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00143
Woska JR Jr, Gillespie ME (2012) SNARE complex-mediated degranulation in mast cells. J Cell Mol Med 16(4):649–656. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01443.x
Puri N, Roche PA (2008) Mast cells possess distinct secretory granule subsets whose exocytosis is regulated by different SNARE isoforms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105(7):2580–2585. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707854105
Cabeza JM, Acosta J, Ales E (2013) Mechanisms of granule membrane recapture following exocytosis in intact mast cells. J Biol Chem 288(28):20293–20305. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.459065
Garcia-Faroldi G, Rodriguez CE, Urdiales JL, Perez-Pomares JM, Davila JC, Pejler G, Sanchez-Jimenez F, Fajardo I (2010) Polyamines are present in mast cell secretory granules and are important for granule homeostasis. PLoS One 5(11):e15071. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0015071
Theoharides TC, Alysandratos KD, Angelidou A, Delivanis DA, Sismanopoulos N, Zhang B, Asadi S, Vasiadi M, Weng Z, Miniati A, Kalogeromitros D (2012) Mast cells and inflammation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1822(1):21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2010.12.014
Metcalfe DD, Pawankar R, Ackerman SJ, Akin C, Clayton F, Falcone FH, Gleich GJ, Irani AM, Johansson MW, Klion AD, Leiferman KM, Levi-Schaffer F, Nilsson G, Okayama Y, Prussin C, Schroeder JT, Schwartz LB, Simon HU, Walls AF, Triggiani M (2016) Biomarkers of the involvement of mast cells, basophils and eosinophils in asthma and allergic diseases. World Allergy Organ J 9:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40413-016-0094-3
Wernersson S, Pejler G (2014) Mast cell secretory granules: armed for battle. Nat Rev Immunol 14(7):478–494. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3690
Caughey GH (2011) Mast cell proteases as protective and inflammatory mediators. Adv Exp Med Biol 716:212–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9533-9_12
Lefrancais E, Duval A, Mirey E, Roga S, Espinosa E, Cayrol C, Girard JP (2014) Central domain of IL-33 is cleaved by mast cell proteases for potent activation of group-2 innate lymphoid cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(43):15502–15507. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410700111
Le QT, Gomez G, Zhao W, Hu J, Xia HZ, Fukuoka Y, Katunuma N, Schwartz LB (2011) Processing of human protryptase in mast cells involves cathepsins L, B, and C. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 187(4):1912–1918. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1001806
Caughey GH (2007) Mast cell tryptases and chymases in inflammation and host defense. Immunol Rev 217:141–154. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.2007.00509.x
Trivedi NN, Caughey GH (2010) Mast cell peptidases: chameleons of innate immunity and host defense. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 42(3):257–267. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2009-0324RT
Galli SJ, Grimbaldeston M, Tsai M (2008) Immunomodulatory mast cells: negative, as well as positive, regulators of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 8(6):478–486. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2327
Henningsson F, Yamamoto K, Saftig P, Reinheckel T, Peters C, Knight SD, Pejler G (2005) A role for cathepsin E in the processing of mast-cell carboxypeptidase a. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 9):2035–2042. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.02333
He SH, Zhang HY, Zeng XN, Chen D, Yang PC (2013) Mast cells and basophils are essential for allergies: mechanisms of allergic inflammation and a proposed procedure for diagnosis. Acta Pharmacol Sin 34(10):1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.1038/aps.2013.88
Parameswaran K, Radford K, Fanat A, Stephen J, Bonnans C, Levy BD, Janssen LJ, Cox PG (2007) Modulation of human airway smooth muscle migration by lipid mediators and Th-2 cytokines. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 37(2):240–247. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2006-0172OC
Kasperska-Zajac A, Brzoza Z, Rogala B (2008) Platelet-activating factor (PAF): a review of its role in asthma and clinical efficacy of PAF antagonists in the disease therapy. Recent Patents Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov 2(1):72–76
Huttunen M, Aalto ML, Harvima RJ, Horsmanheimo M, Harvima IT (2000) Alterations in mast cells showing tryptase and chymase activity in epithelializating and chronic wounds. Exp Dermatol 9(4):258–265
KleinJan A (2016) Airway inflammation in asthma: key players beyond the Th2 pathway. Curr Opin Pulm Med 22(1):46–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000000224
Nakae S, Morita H, Ohno T, Arae K, Matsumoto K, Saito H (2013) Role of interleukin-33 in innate-type immune cells in allergy. Allergol Int Off J Jpn Soc Allergol 62(1):13–20. https://doi.org/10.2332/allergolint.13-RAI-0538
de Vries VC, Noelle RJ (2010) Mast cell mediators in tolerance. Curr Opin Immunol 22(5):643–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coi.2010.08.015
Shiota N, Nishikori Y, Kakizoe E, Shimoura K, Niibayashi T, Shimbori C, Tanaka T, Okunishi H (2010) Pathophysiological role of skin mast cells in wound healing after scald injury: study with mast cell-deficient W/W(V) mice. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 151(1):80–88. https://doi.org/10.1159/000232573
Wasiuk A, de Vries VC, Hartmann K, Roers A, Noelle RJ (2009) Mast cells as regulators of adaptive immunity to tumours. Clin Exp Immunol 155(2):140–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2008.03840.x
Overed-Sayer C, Rapley L, Mustelin T, Clarke DL (2013) Are mast cells instrumental for fibrotic diseases? Front Pharmacol 4:174. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2013.00174
Waern I, Karlsson I, Pejler G, Wernersson S (2016) IL-6 and IL-17A degradation by mast cells is mediated by a serglycin:serine protease axis. Immun Inflamm Dis 4(1):70–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/iid3.95
Dichlberger A, Kovanen PT, Schneider WJ (2013) Mast cells: from lipid droplets to lipid mediators. Clin Sci (Lond, Engl : 1979) 125(3):121–130. https://doi.org/10.1042/cs20120602
Nocka K, Majumder S, Chabot B, Ray P, Cervone M, Bernstein A, Besmer P (1989) Expression of c-kit gene products in known cellular targets of W mutations in normal and W mutant mice--evidence for an impaired c-kit kinase in mutant mice. Genes Dev 3(6):816–826
Ronnstrand L (2004) Signal transduction via the stem cell factor receptor/c-kit. Cell Mol Life Sci CMLS 61(19–20):2535–2548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-004-4189-6
Reber LL, Marichal T, Galli SJ (2012) New models for analyzing mast cell functions in vivo. Trends Immunol 33(12):613–625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2012.09.008
Galli SJ, Kalesnikoff J, Grimbaldeston MA, Piliponsky AM, Williams CM, Tsai M (2005) Mast cells as “tunable” effector and immunoregulatory cells: recent advances. Annu Rev Immunol 23:749–786. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.21.120601.141025
Wedemeyer J, Galli SJ (2005) Decreased susceptibility of mast cell-deficient kit(W)/kit(W-v) mice to the development of 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine-induced intestinal tumors. Lab Invest J Tech Methods Pathol 85(3):388–396. https://doi.org/10.1038/labinvest.3700232
Galli SJ, Tsai M (2010) Mast cells in allergy and infection: versatile effector and regulatory cells in innate and adaptive immunity. Eur J Immunol 40(7):1843–1851. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201040559
Duttlinger R, Manova K, Chu TY, Gyssler C, Zelenetz AD, Bachvarova RF, Besmer P (1993) W-sash affects positive and negative elements controlling c-kit expression: ectopic c-kit expression at sites of kit-ligand expression affects melanogenesis. Development (Cambridge, England) 118(3):705–717
Chmelar J, Chatzigeorgiou A, Chung KJ, Prucnal M, Voehringer D, Roers A, Chavakis T (2016) No role for mast cells in obesity-related metabolic dysregulation. Front Immunol 7:524. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00524
Feyerabend TB, Weiser A, Tietz A, Stassen M, Harris N, Kopf M, Radermacher P, Moller P, Benoist C, Mathis D, Fehling HJ, Rodewald HR (2011) Cre-mediated cell ablation contests mast cell contribution in models of antibody- and T cell-mediated autoimmunity. Immunity 35(5):832–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.015
Feyerabend TB, Gutierrez DA, Rodewald HR (2016) Of mouse models of mast cell deficiency and metabolic syndrome. Cell Metab 24(1):1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2016.06.019
Lei Y, Gregory JA, Nilsson GP, Adner M (2013) Insights into mast cell functions in asthma using mouse models. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 26(5):532–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pupt.2013.03.019
Elieh Ali Komi D, Rambasek T, Bielory L (2018) Clinical implications of mast cell involvement in allergic conjunctivitis. Allergy 73(3):528–539. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13334
Church MK, Kolkhir P, Metz M, Maurer M (2018) The role and relevance of mast cells in urticaria. Immunol Rev 282(1):232–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/imr.12632
Lee CC, Lin CL, Leu SJ, Lee YL (2018) Overexpression of notch ligand Delta-like-1 by dendritic cells enhances their immunoregulatory capacity and exerts antiallergic effects on Th2-mediated allergic asthma in mice. Clin Immunol (Orlando, FL) 187:58–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clim.2017.10.005
Galli SJ, Tsai M (2012) IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat Med 18(5):693–704. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.2755
Ciprandi G, Marseglia GL, Castagnoli R, Valsecchi C, Tagliacarne C, Caimmi S, Licari A (2015) From IgE to clinical trials of allergic rhinitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 11(12):1321–1333. https://doi.org/10.1586/1744666x.2015.1086645
Shamji MH, Durham SR (2017) Mechanisms of allergen immunotherapy for inhaled allergens and predictive biomarkers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 140(6):1485–1498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.010
Modena BD, Dazy K, White AA (2016) Emerging concepts: mast cell involvement in allergic diseases. Transl Res J Lab Clin Med 174:98–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2016.02.011
Brown MA, Hatfield JK (2012) Mast cells are important modifiers of autoimmune disease: with so much evidence, why is there still controversy? Front Immunol 3:147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00147
Rivellese F, Nerviani A, Rossi FW, Marone G, Matucci-Cerinic M, de Paulis A, Pitzalis C (2017) Mast cells in rheumatoid arthritis: friends or foes? Autoimmun Rev 16(6):557–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2017.04.001
Sato K, Takayanagi H (2006) Osteoclasts, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoimmunology. Curr Opin Rheumatol 18(4):419–426. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bor.0000231912.24740.a5
Elieh-Ali-Komi D, Cao Y (2016) Role of mast cells in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-016-8595-y
Theoharides TC, Kempuraj D, Kourelis T, Manola A (2008) Human mast cells stimulate activated T cells: implications for multiple sclerosis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1144:74–82. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1418.029
Conti P, Kempuraj D (2016) Important role of mast cells in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord 5:77–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2015.11.005
Medic N, Vita F, Abbate R, Soranzo MR, Pacor S, Fabbretti E, Borelli V, Zabucchi G (2008) Mast cell activation by myelin through scavenger receptor. J Neuroimmunol 200(1–2):27–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2008.05.019
Li H, Nourbakhsh B, Safavi F, Li K, Xu H, Cullimore M, Zhou F, Zhang G, Rostami A (2011) Kit (W-sh) mice develop earlier and more severe experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis due to absence of immune suppression. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 187(1):274–282. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1003603
Komi DEA, Redegeld FA (2019) Role of mast cells in shaping the tumor microenvironment. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-019-08753-w
Rigoni A, Colombo MP, Pucillo C (2015) The role of mast cells in molding the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron Off J Int Cancer Microenviron Soc 8(3):167–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12307-014-0152-8
Huang B, Lei Z, Zhang GM, Li D, Song C, Li B, Liu Y, Yuan Y, Unkeless J, Xiong H, Feng ZH (2008) SCF-mediated mast cell infiltration and activation exacerbate the inflammation and immunosuppression in tumor microenvironment. Blood 112(4):1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-03-147033
Maciel TT, Moura IC, Hermine O (2015) The role of mast cells in cancers. F1000prime reports 7:09. https://doi.org/10.12703/p7-09
Gounaris E, Blatner NR, Dennis K, Magnusson F, Gurish MF, Strom TB, Beckhove P, Gounari F, Khazaie K (2009) T-regulatory cells shift from a protective anti-inflammatory to a cancer-promoting proinflammatory phenotype in polyposis. Cancer Res 69(13):5490–5497. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-09-0304
Danelli L, Frossi B, Pucillo CE (2015) Mast cell/MDSC a liaison immunosuppressive for tumor microenvironment. Oncoimmunology 4(4):e1001232. https://doi.org/10.1080/2162402x.2014.1001232
Ryan JJ, Morales JK, Falanga YT, Fernando JF, Macey MR (2009) Mast cell regulation of the immune response. World Allergy Organ J 2(10):224–232. https://doi.org/10.1097/WOX.0b013e3181c2a95e
Wulff BC, Wilgus TA (2013) Mast cell activity in the healing wound: more than meets the eye? Exp Dermatol 22(8):507–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12169
Kennelly R, Conneely JB, Bouchier-Hayes D, Winter DC (2011) Mast cells in tissue healing: from skin to the gastrointestinal tract. Curr Pharm Des 17(34):3772–3775
Ng MF (2010) The role of mast cells in wound healing. Int Wound J 7(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00651.x
Trautmann A, Toksoy A, Engelhardt E, Brocker EB, Gillitzer R (2000) Mast cell involvement in normal human skin wound healing: expression of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is correlated with recruitment of mast cells which synthesize interleukin-4 in vivo. J Pathol 190(1):100–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-9896(200001)190:1<100::aid-path496>3.0.co;2-q
Tellechea A, Leal EC, Kafanas A, Auster ME, Kuchibhotla S, Ostrovsky Y, Tecilazich F, Baltzis D, Zheng Y, Carvalho E, Zabolotny JM, Weng Z, Petra A, Patel A, Panagiotidou S, Pradhan-Nabzdyk L, Theoharides TC, Veves A (2016) Mast cells regulate wound healing in diabetes. Diabetes 65(7):2006–2019. https://doi.org/10.2337/db15-0340
Artuc M, Hermes B, Steckelings UM, Grutzkau A, Henz BM (1999) Mast cells and their mediators in cutaneous wound healing--active participants or innocent bystanders? Exp Dermatol 8(1):1–16
Rao KN, Brown MA (2008) Mast cells: multifaceted immune cells with diverse roles in health and disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1143:83–104. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1443.023
Mekori YA, Hershko AY (2012) T cell-mediated modulation of mast cell function: heterotypic adhesion-induced stimulatory or inhibitory effects. Front Immunol 3:6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00006
Martin RK, Saleem SJ, Folgosa L, Zellner HB, Damle SR, Nguyen GK, Ryan JJ, Bear HD, Irani AM, Conrad DH (2014) Mast cell histamine promotes the immunoregulatory activity of myeloid-derived suppressor cells. J Leukoc Biol 96(1):151–159. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.5A1213-644R
Carroll-Portillo A, Cannon JL, te Riet J, Holmes A, Kawakami Y, Kawakami T, Cambi A, Lidke DS (2015) Mast cells and dendritic cells form synapses that facilitate antigen transfer for T cell activation. J Cell Biol 210(5):851–864. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201412074
Galli SJ, Nakae S, Tsai M (2005) Mast cells in the development of adaptive immune responses. Nat Immunol 6(2):135–142. https://doi.org/10.1038/ni1158
Dahdah A, Gautier G, Attout T, Fiore F, Lebourdais E, Msallam R, Daeron M, Monteiro RC, Benhamou M, Charles N, Davoust J, Blank U, Malissen B, Launay P (2014) Mast cells aggravate sepsis by inhibiting peritoneal macrophage phagocytosis. J Clin Invest 124(10):4577–4589. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci75212
De Filippo K, Dudeck A, Hasenberg M, Nye E, van Rooijen N, Hartmann K, Gunzer M, Roers A, Hogg N (2013) Mast cell and macrophage chemokines CXCL1/CXCL2 control the early stage of neutrophil recruitment during tissue inflammation. Blood 121(24):4930–4937. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2013-02-486217
Hodges K, Kennedy L, Meng F, Alpini G, Francis H (2012) Mast cells, disease and gastrointestinal cancer: a comprehensive review of recent findings. Transl Gastrointest Cancer 1(2):138–150
Schramm R, Thorlacius H (2004) Neutrophil recruitment in mast cell-dependent inflammation: inhibitory mechanisms of glucocorticoids. Inflamm Res Off J Eur Histamine Res Soc 53(12):644–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-004-1307-8
Symowski C, Voehringer D (2017) Interactions between innate lymphoid cells and cells of the innate and adaptive immune system. Front Immunol 8:1422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01422
Ganeshan K, Bryce PJ (2012) Regulatory T cells enhance mast cell production of IL-6 via surface-bound TGF-beta. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 188(2):594–603. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1102389
de Vries VC, Wasiuk A, Bennett KA, Benson MJ, Elgueta R, Waldschmidt TJ, Noelle RJ (2009) Mast cell degranulation breaks peripheral tolerance. Am J Transplant Off J Am Soc Transplant Am Soc Transplant Surg 9(10):2270–2280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02755.x
Hershko AY, Rivera J (2010) Mast cell and T cell communication; amplification and control of adaptive immunity. Immunol Lett 128(2):98–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imlet.2009.10.013
Satoh T, Akira S (2016) Toll-like receptor signaling and its inducible proteins. Microbiol Spectr 4(6). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.MCHD-0040-2016
Leifer CA, Medvedev AE (2016) Molecular mechanisms of regulation of toll-like receptor signaling. J Leukoc Biol 100(5):927–941. https://doi.org/10.1189/jlb.2MR0316-117RR
St John AL, Abraham SN (2013) Innate immunity and its regulation by mast cells. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 190(9):4458–4463. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1203420
Abraham SN, St John AL (2010) Mast cell-orchestrated immunity to pathogens. Nat Rev Immunol 10(6):440–452. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2782
Chan CY, St John AL, Abraham SN (2012) Plasticity in mast cell responses during bacterial infections. Curr Opin Microbiol 15(1):78–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mib.2011.10.007
Saluja R, Metz M, Maurer M (2012) Role and relevance of mast cells in fungal infections. Front Immunol 3:146. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2012.00146
Carlos D, Frantz FG, Souza-Junior DA, Jamur MC, Oliver C, Ramos SG, Quesniaux VF, Ryffel B, Silva CL, Bozza MT, Faccioli LH (2009) TLR2-dependent mast cell activation contributes to the control of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Microbes Infect 11(8–9):770–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micinf.2009.04.025
Sutherland RE, Olsen JS, McKinstry A, Villalta SA, Wolters PJ (2008) Mast cell IL-6 improves survival from Klebsiella pneumonia and sepsis by enhancing neutrophil killing. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 181(8):5598–5605
Junkins RD, Carrigan SO, Wu Z, Stadnyk AW, Cowley E, Issekutz T, Berman J, Lin TJ (2014) Mast cells protect against Pseudomonas aeruginosa-induced lung injury. Am J Pathol 184(8):2310–2321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.05.009
Siebenhaar F, Syska W, Weller K, Magerl M, Zuberbier T, Metz M, Maurer M (2007) Control of Pseudomonas aeruginosa skin infections in mice is mast cell-dependent. Am J Pathol 170(6):1910–1916. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2007.060770
Walker ME, Hatfield JK, Brown MA (2012) New insights into the role of mast cells in autoimmunity: evidence for a common mechanism of action? Biochim Biophys Acta 1822(1):57–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbadis.2011.02.009
Wang Z, Lai Y, Bernard JJ, Macleod DT, Cogen AL, Moss B, Di Nardo A (2012) Skin mast cells protect mice against vaccinia virus by triggering mast cell receptor S1PR2 and releasing antimicrobial peptides. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md : 1950) 188(1):345–357. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1101703
Aoki R, Kawamura T, Goshima F, Ogawa Y, Nakae S, Nakao A, Moriishi K, Nishiyama Y, Shimada S (2013) Mast cells play a key role in host defense against herpes simplex virus infection through TNF-alpha and IL-6 production. J Invest Dermatol 133(9):2170–2179. https://doi.org/10.1038/jid.2013.150
Choi HW, Abraham SN (2015) Mast cell mediator responses and their suppression by pathogenic and commensal microorganisms. Mol Immunol 63(1):74–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molimm.2014.02.006
Elieh Ali Komi D, Shafaghat F, Zwiener RD (2017) Immunology of bee venom. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-017-8597-4
Galli SJ, Starkl P, Marichal T, Tsai M (2017) Mast cells and IgE can enhance survival during innate and acquired host responses to venoms. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 128:193–221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Daniel Elieh Ali Komi, Stefan Wöhrl, and Leonard Bielory have been directly involved in the preparation of the manuscript. Daniel Elieh Ali Komi has designed and created the figures. Leonard Bielory and Stefan Wöhrl have reviewed, revised, and added inputs.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed Consent
No informed consent was required to prepare the manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Elieh Ali Komi, D., Wöhrl, S. & Bielory, L. Mast Cell Biology at Molecular Level: a Comprehensive Review. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol 58, 342–365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-019-08769-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-019-08769-2