Abstract
Natural antibodies (nAbs) are most commonly defined as immunoglobulins present in the absence of pathological conditions or deliberate immunizations. Occurrence of nAbs in germ- and antigen-free mice suggest that their production is driven, at least in part, by self-antigens. Accordingly, nAbs are constituted of natural autoantibodies (nAAbs), and can belong to the IgM, IgG, or IgA subclasses. These nAbs provide immediate protection against infection while the adaptive arm of the immune system mounts a specific and long-term response. Beyond immediate protection from infection, nAbs have been shown to play various functional roles in the immune system, which include clearance of apoptotic debris, suppression of autoimmune and inflammatory responses, regulation of B cell responses, selection of the B cell repertoires, and regulation of B cell development. These various functions of nAbs are afforded by their reactivity, which is broad, cross-reactive, and shown to recognize evolutionarily fixed epitopes shared between foreign and self-antigens. Furthermore, nAbs have unique characteristics that also contribute to their functional roles and set them apart from antigen-specific antibodies. In further support for the role of nAbs in the protection against infections and in the maintenance of immune homeostasis, the therapeutic preparation of polyclonal immunoglobulins, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rich in nAbs is commonly used in the replacement therapy of primary and secondary immunodeficiencies and in the immunotherapy of a large number of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Here, we review several topics on nAbs features and functions, and therapeutic applications in human diseases.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The successful treatment of diphtheria using immune serum by Emil Adolf von Behring and Émile Roux in the nineteenth century paved the way for the discovery of antibodies (Abs) in serum as gamma globulin proteins and its basic structure was elucidated in the twentieth century [1, 2]. There was a parallel expansion in the application of serum with anti-infection capabilities against other microbial diseases to confer immunity against dreadful pathogens; hence, the name immunoglobulins (Igs) came into practice. Subsequently, thorough characterization of the antibodies produced following microbial infection or immunization, referred to as immune antibodies, was done [3]. Further studies identified varieties of Igs differing in their structure and function. These are divided into five classes/isotypes, namely IgG, IgM, IgA, IgE, and IgD [4]. Antibody production is the main function of differentiated B cells. Well established as effector molecules of the adaptive compartment, Abs also participate as links or organizing factors for certain functions of the innate immune system by identifying and neutralizing the pathogens in part through the triggering of Fc receptors (FcRs) and activation of the complement system [5].
In the early 1960s, the existence of circulating antibodies in neonates (cord blood) and healthy adults in the absence of exogenous antigen stimulation or deliberate immunization, referred to as natural antibodies (nAbs), was also identified [6]. Although the origin and function of nAbs have been the subject of age-old discussions, one hallmark of nAbs is that they can be found in germ- and antigen-free mice, observations which suggest that their production may be driven, at least in part, by self-antigens. However, it is also clear that exposure to microorganisms, either intentionally or environmentally derived, results in long-lasting effects on the clonal diversity of these Abs, their circulating levels, and ultimately their biological functions which include first-line defense as well as immunoregulatory activities. Here, we review several topics on nAbs features and functions, and therapeutic applications in human diseases.
Source and Origin of Natural Antibodies
Emerging Information in Mice
Despite the continued interest in nAbs since 1960s, the evidence for their cellular source began to emerge only after 1983, particularly in mice. A subset of B cells, named B-1 cells, was recognized as the source of nAbs. B-1 cells were initially identified by their expression of CD5 and were further characterized by surface expression of IgMhigh, IgDlow, CD19high, B220low, CD23−, and CD43+, which contrasts with the surface phenotype of follicular B2 cells: CD5−, IgMlow, IgDhigh, CD19+, B220+, CD23+, and CD43− (Table. 1). Subsequently, an additional population of B-1 cells was identified, which shared the characteristics of CD5+ B1 but lacked CD5 expression. These two populations of B-1 cells are termed B-1a (CD5+) and B-1b (CD5−) cells [7, 8]. B-1 cells are found in various tissues of adult mice, including the peritoneal cavity, pleural cavity, spleen, bone marrow, lymph nodes, and blood that contribute to greater than 90% of nAb [7]. Interestingly, B-1 cells located in the peritoneal cavity and pleural cavity serve as an important reservoir for B-1a cells and form a pool of long-lived, self-renewing B cells that produce most of the circulating natural IgM antibodies [9]. However, it has been suggested that within the B-1 cell population, those residing in the bone marrow and the spleen are the true nAb-secreting cells, whereas body cavity B-1 cells constitute a population of responder (memory type) lymphocytes, which after stimulation migrate and differentiate into IgM-secreting cells [8, 10]. In addition, a population of CD138+ B-1a cells and marginal zone B cells, subset of B-2 cells, are also found to produce nAbs in mice. Therefore, more than one B cell population is responsible for nAb production and not all subsets of B-1 cells spontaneously secrete nAbs that accumulate in serum, as some of the B-1 cells can differentiate into antigen-induced antibody-secreting cells (Table 1) [7]. It should be noted that, although B cell receptor (BCR)-signaling is critical for B-1 cell development, BCR- and T cell–independent innate immune activation of B-1 cells in body cavities and marginal zone B cells (both referred to as innate-like B cells) can induce nAb production. These stimuli include IL-5, IL-10, toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, or whole bacteria that can alter the B-1 cell normal trafficking patterns and induce differentiation into cells that secrete large amounts of IgM and/or IgA. Furthermore, similar to phenotypic diversity, B-1 cells are also capable of differentiating into antigen-induced Ab-secreting cells [7]. Thus, the generalized concept of B-1 cells as source/producers of nAbs may not be a complete description. Nevertheless, extensive research points to the possibility that, at least in mice, nAbs can originate from multiple B cell subsets that arise at different times of development from a distinct progenitor cells [11]. Future studies should lead us to an understanding of the role of different source and origin (B cell subsets and their stimuli) of nAbs and their contribution to the nAb pool.
Evidence in Humans
In line with mice, nAb-secreting cells in humans were first identified as CD5+ peripheral B cells [12]. However, CD5−CD45RAlo peripheral B cells were also found to produce natural IgM [8, 13]. Further, expression of surface CD5 on cord blood B cells is not a definitive marker of an auto/polyreactive population, and also, CD5 may be an activation marker on human B cells. Notably, recent efforts based on natural/spontaneous antibody secretion refined the phenotypic characteristics of nAb-producing cells in human adult and cord blood as CD20+CD27+CD43+CD70−CD38mod, the majority of which express CD5 and this is in contrast to the phenotype of plasmablasts: CD20−CD27highCD38high (immune Ab-secreting cells) and activated memory B cells: CD20+CD27+CD43+CD70+ (Table 1) [14, 15]. Interestingly, similar to mice, not all human B-1 cells spontaneously secrete nAbs, and polyclonal stimulation, like TLR9 ligand, CpG, increased the frequencies of antibody-secreting cells, a feature also seen in memory B cells [15] and transitional B cells [16]. Nevertheless, the phenotype of nAb-secreting cells in humans is still unclear, and further studies are required to clarify the specific types of cells capable of producing nAbs and also their locations other than in blood.
Characteristics and Reactivity of Natural Antibodies
Classes of nAbs and Generation in Mice and Humans
Natural antibodies in the circulation of a normal healthy individual can be of IgM, IgG, and IgA classes. However, studies in mice suggest that nAbs are mainly IgM, but also IgA, IgG3, and IgE types, and are proposed to be T cell independent. Although nAbs are mainly germ line–like in mice as evidenced by absence of non-templated nucleotides (N-additions during VDJ recombination) with minimum to no somatic hypermutation in VDJ of B-1a cells [17], nAbs with significantly more N-additions and hypermutations with isotype switching (IgM to IgG) are seen with increasing age [18]. Accordingly, IgG and IgA are also part of the nAb pool in mice, although, unlike serum natural IgM, their levels are dependent on exogenous antigen stimulation as evidenced by decreased amounts in germ-free mice [8]. Interestingly, unlike mice, IgM is not the only isotype present in the prenatal repertoire of human B cells. It was demonstrated that after 26 weeks of gestation, B cell clones encoding IgG start to appear in a frequency similar to that observed in healthy infants [19]. Therefore, contrary to observations in mice, the nAb pool in humans contains IgM, IgG, and IgA classes and exhibits similar reactivity in cord blood to that of adults. Furthermore, both fetal and adult-derived human B cells express Ig with numerous N-additions in VDJ [8], and somatic hypermutations occur during human fetal B cell development even in a T cell–independent fashion [19]. However, there is no evidence in humans for T cell dependency of nAb production, despite the presence of autoreactive T cells in healthy individuals, although mainly with regulatory roles [20]. Autoreactive CD4+ T cells specific for a number of self-antigens, including myelin basic protein, the acetylcholine receptor, the thyroglobulin-stimulating hormone receptor, and the gpIIbIIIa platelet antigen have been reported in healthy individuals. It has been also hypothesized that natural autoreactive B cells are endowed with some switching ability in the absence of cognate interactions with T cells, based on the finding of small amounts of IgG in the serum of CD40L-deficient patients with the hyper-IgM syndrome [21]. Thus, the mechanisms of generation of natural IgM, IgG, and IgA antibodies are poorly understood and may differ from each other.
Characteristics of nAbs
In general, nAbs are characterized by their low affinity, high avidity, and broad/multi reactivity against self-antigens (nAAbs), but some have the ability to recognize evolutionarily conserved epitopes occurring in foreign antigens (Fig. 1). In mice, prenatal B-1 cells express a mainly germ line–encoded repertoire, while postnatally developing B-1 cells can express Ig with a greater degree of variation [7]. Yet, the probability of nAb recognition of foreign structures as a result of cross-reactivity against self-antigens is still a hotly debated topic. However, it is being increasingly appreciated that nAAb production does not represent non-specific, antigen-independent “leakage” of terminal B cell differentiation, but the result of positive selection processes for autoreactive B cells dependent on the variable (V) region, resulting in low-affinity reactivity directed at a set of evolutionarily conserved (auto)antigens, such as circulating antigens, cell surface, and intracellular structures [20, 22]. These epitopes may exist constitutively or represent neoepitopes that result from altered glycosylation of host proteins or oxidation of host constituents. Targeting of these endogenous epitopes, which are usually sequestered from immunosurveillance, provides beneficial housekeeping functions [23]. Therefore, nAAbs are considered to be a manifestation of physiological autoreactivity expressed in healthy individuals and represent normal responses to self-antigens [20]. In line with this, it has been estimated that 5–15% of splenic B cells activated in vivo can secrete nAbs [21] and up to 20% of circulating human B cells are autoreactive [24].
Reactivities of nAbs
Notably, the well-characterized epitopes for nAbs to date are shared by pathogens and host, which include phospholipids, oxidized lipids, glycolipids, and glycoproteins, both in mice and humans. The best-characterized B-1 cell–derived nAb binds the phospholipid phosphorylcholine (PC) and utilizes VHS107.1 [25]. PC is found within the bacterial cell wall of Streptococcus pneumoniae and is also exposed on apoptotic cells and oxidized lipids, but hidden in healthy cells [26]. Studies in mice revealed nAb binding to red blood cells treated with bromelain (that exposes phosphatidylcholine, PtC) were B-1 cell-derived and utilized VH11, VH12, and Q52 [8]. Antibodies that recognize glycan epitopes are also highly abundant in both mice and humans. Glycan epitopes are observed on both glycoproteins and glycolipids and can be present in autologous or pathogen-associated exogenous structures. In mice, the specificities of such antibodies include α-1,3-glucan, N-acetyl-d-glucosamine, and α-1,3-galactose epitopes [27]. In humans, the best known anti-glycan antibodies react with blood group antigens A and B, the xenoantigen Gal-alpha-1, 3Gal-beta-1,4GlcNAc, Forssman glycolipid antigen, and gangliosides such as the tumor-associated antigen Neu5GcGM3 [8, 23].
Broad reactivity or polyreactivity of nAbs toward self and/or foreign antigens does not correlate with their connectivity (i.e., their ability to interact with variable regions of other autoantibodies) (reviewed in [28]). Polyreactivity does not suggest lack of specificity, but nAbs are “polyreactive” only in the sense that they bind the identical epitope on a variety of molecular entities and also feature their own distinct set of epitopic specificities. The notion that an antibody must be of high affinity in order to be biologically relevant originates primarily from the analysis of the requirements for an efficient immune response against pathogens. This concept does not necessarily apply to nAbs. Accordingly, earlier literature suggested that nAbs might exhibit a broad range of affinities, with dissociation constants ranging between 10−5 and 10−8 M. However, advanced technologies to measure protein–protein interactions have shown that overall affinity of natural IgG autoantibodies specific for molecules such as HLA class I, CD4, the RGD (Arg-Gly-Asp tripeptide) motive, and autologous blood group antigens, in the micromolar range [21].
The germ line neonatal B cell repertoire encoding IgM antibodies in the fetus has been evolutionarily selected for its reactivity with self-antigens. Interestingly, the self-reactive repertoire of IgG is established within the first 2–4 years of life and it is highly homogenous among children and similar to that expressed by the IgG of healthy young and older adults, whereas the repertoire of IgG (cross)-reactivities toward foreign and self-antigens is diverse and dependent on the history of each individual’s immune system (reviewed in [28]). Therefore, it is now becoming clear that exposure to microorganisms, either intentionally or environmentally derived, results in long-lasting effects on the clonal diversity of these Abs, their circulating levels, and ultimately their biological functions which include first-line defense as well as immunoregulatory activities [23].
Functions of natural antibodies
Several lines of evidence have clarified the evolutionarily conserved (cross-)reactivity of nAbs supporting an important physiological role in the immune system [20], and hence, multiple functions of nAbs have been postulated. Owing to their cross-reactivity to foreign antigens, nAbs neutralize microbes and microbial toxins, strongly suggesting a role for nAbs in natural host defense against infection. A major role for nAbs is in immune regulation, which includes the removal of senescent/altered self-molecules, cells, and tumors, and controlling untoward autoimmune responses, possibly by virtue of their ability to modify the functions of some of their target antigens. Indeed, it has been shown that antibodies from healthy individuals display a promiscuous hydrolytic activity, as opposed to more specific enzymatic activity of antigen-specific autoantibodies in patients with autoimmune diseases (reviewed in [29]).
Natural Antibodies as a First-Line of Defense Against Pathogens
The most relevant roles for infectious disease control are the ability of nAbs to provide protection against pathogens, and in the clearance of endotoxin. The first indication of the crucial role of nAbs in controlling infections came from the evidence that primary Ig-deficient patients display high susceptibility for recurrent infections from bacteria, virus, fungi, and parasites. In particular, nAbs have been shown to provide protection against Streptococcus pneumoniae, Borrelia hermsii, influenza virus, Listeria monocytogenes, vesicular stomatitis virus, lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus, Cryptococcus neoformans, Pneumocystis murina, and Francisella tularensis (reviewed in [8]). Such protection is afforded by virtue of nAbs’ cross-reactivity toward ubiquitous bacterial antigens/epitope recognition. For example, in mice, nAbs to phosphocholine can protect against intravenous infection with type 3 Streptococcus pneumoniae [30].
Studies using mice and human sera antibodies suggest that anti-microbial nAbs are mainly of IgM isotype (Fig. 2), and act by virtue of the ability of polyclonal nIgM to directly recognize a wide range of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that leads to inhibition of the growth of microbial pathogens through their direct neutralization, by activation of the classical complement pathway to inhibit bacterial growth by lysis, generation of anaphylatoxin C5a, enhancement of phagocytosis, neutralization of the functional activity of endotoxin, and amplification of humoral immune responses, leading to the enhanced phagocytosis of these opsonized pathogens [31,32,33]. Mice deficient in natural IgM might be less resistant to viral infection or also succumb to infections as a result of a lack of pathogen clearance, decreased neutrophil recruitment, and elevated proinflammatory serum cytokines [32, 34].
In addition, nAbs also alert and prime the adaptive immune system against subsequent pathogen attack and are essential in the induction of an immune response that protects against bacterial and viral pathogens. The IgG response to T cell–dependent antigens was impaired in IgM-deficient mice, which can be rescued by administration of normal IgM prior to immunization [35]. For example, lack of natural anti-influenza IgM leads to delayed T cell–dependent IgG2a response and increased mortality in mice [36]. Several mechanisms may be involved in this function of nAbs. The formation of immune complexes by nAbs can direct Ags to the secondary lymphoid organs, where presentation to T and B cells is efficient. nAbs may guide the ensuing functional polarization of T cell responses, as well the isotype class-switch recombination of the induced B cell response and the induction of long-term immune memory. IgM immune complexes with pathogens bind complement that in turn binds to complement receptors on dendritic cells (DCs) and B cells [34, 37]. It is known that cross-linking the complement receptor 2 (CR2) reduces the triggering threshold of B cells. By allowing simultaneous engagement of BCR and the CD21/CD19, nAbs may therefore lower the threshold of B cell activation. Furthermore, virus/nAb complexes with increasing particle size enhance phagocytosis by macrophages in a CR3- and CR4-dependent fashion, which can now present virus-derived peptides to T cells. Finally, polymeric IgM nAbs can cross-link the BCR on B cells that have already captured antigen (Fig. 2) (Reviewed in [28]).
Interestingly, in contrast to the direct recognition of microbes by nIgM, recent in vitro studies have revealed that natural IgG purified from uninfected/healthy human serum recognize a range of gram-negative (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa) and gram-positive (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus) bacteria with the aid of serum lectin innate receptors (e.g., ficolin and Mannan-binding lectin, MBL), which are known to bind to sugar residues (e.g., N-acetylglucosamine) on the microbes. The partnership between natural IgG and lectins (prebound on the microbe) efficiently drive phagocytosis of the bacteria via the FcγRI receptor on human monocytes [38]. Furthermore, the interaction between natural IgG (CH2-CH3 domain on Fc) with ficolin (P-subdomain of FBG domain) can be triggered under infection–inflammation conditions to augment the immune response [39].
As previously discussed, exposure to microorganisms that have antigenic epitopes similar to that of self-antigens influences the clonal diversity of nAbs. It is proposed that neonatal exposure to conserved epitopes (host and bacterial cells and other common environmental allergens) reprograms the nAb repertoire directed toward these antigens by clonal expansion, alterations in clonal dominance, and increased serum antibody levels. For example, the production of nAbs to N-acetyl-D-glucosamine (GlcNAc) shared with bacterial polysaccharide (PS) substantially increases in humans with neonatal infection of pneumococcus or group A streptococcus (GAS) levels. This has been demonstrated to provide protection against diverse pathogenic organisms that may be relevant to the development of allergic diseases. The proposed mechanisms of neonatal microbial exposure-induced protection against allergic airway inflammation is by engaging epitopes common to multiple allergens, including GlcNac (chitin), PC, and glucans, and this leads to interruption of microorganism–innate receptor interactions, which can result in an attenuated allergic airway response to fungi-, house dust mite-, and cockroach-associated allergens as seen in mouse models. Here, nAbs may abrogate the recognition of these moieties with innate receptors, which recognize the allergens and promote immune activation that results in sensitization [23]. However, significant protection against airway sensitization is dependent on the timing of induction and the antigenic targets of these Abs. The similarities between the murine and human natural antibody repertoires suggest that reduced microbial exposure in children may have the opposite effect, providing a potential mechanistic explanation for the hygiene hypothesis. In line with this, it is suggested that understanding the effects of childhood infections on the natural antibody repertoire and the mechanisms of antibody-mediated immune regulation observed in allergy models will lead to the development of prevention/interventional strategies for the treatment of allergic asthma [23].
In further support for the role of nAbs in protection against infections, the therapeutic preparation of polyclonal immunoglobulins, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rich in nAbs is commonly used for antibody replacement therapy in primary and secondary immunodeficiency patients [40]. Routinely, IVIG (400 mg/kg) is used in patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia (XLA), common variable immunodeficiency (CVID), X-linked hyper-IgM, severe combined immunodeficiency, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, and selective IgG class deficiencies (Table 2) [40]. Variations in the processing of IVIG products and the geographical location of plasma donors might influence the efficacy of IVIG in immunodeficiency [41]. Interestingly, several lines of experimental and clinical evidence gathered in recent years reveal that therapeutic benefits of IVIG therapy extend beyond the mere anti-infective mechanisms via passive transfer of antibodies into the active role of immune homeostasis even in immunodeficiency [29, 40, 42,43,44,45].
Natural Antibodies in Tissue Homeostasis and Immune Tolerance
nAbs may have first arisen to reinforce an important goal of maintaining homeostasis. In line with this, as noted previously, the repertoire of nAbs is dominated by self-reactive ones (nAAbs) and contributes/mediates the immune regulatory functions of nAbs in physiology, and also the disease ameliorative effects of therapeutic immunoglobulin (IVIG) in autoimmune and inflammatory disorders. Interestingly, antibody immunodeficiencies are also associated with autoimmunity and inflammatory conditions, suggestive of a dysregulated immune status, thus supporting the role of nAbs in immune tolerance and maintaining tissue homeostasis [46].
Natural IgM: Role of nAbs in Apoptosis and Immune Regulation
Apoptosis is an obligatory outcome of development, proliferation, and cell differentiation that continues throughout life. Every day, > 1011 cells in our body die by apoptosis, and therefore, apoptotic cell (AC) clearance is essential for tissue homeostasis. In health, ACs do not pose an immediate threat to the host, as there are redundant means mediated by soluble innate immune molecules, such as complement C1q mannose-binding lectin (MBL) and nAbs to ensure rapid and efficient cell corpse clearance by macrophages and DCs [47]. If the efficiency of AC clearance is limited, there can be progression to secondary necrosis and the ensuing release of nuclear Ags and other components of dying cells (danger-associated molecular patterns, DAMPS), which are believed to activate pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) of innate immune cells that include TLR, leading to inflammatory responses. Necrotic cells can also release autoantigens that can select pathogenic B and T cell clones, which together can lead to the development of autoimmune disease in predisposed individuals [47, 48].
Newborn humans and naïve mice have considerable levels of nIgM that recognize AC membranes (ACMs), whereas even higher levels can be induced by intravenous infusions of large numbers of ACs [49, 50]. Furthermore, experimental models have shown that suppression of inflammatory arthritis mediated by ACs may require nIgM that can directly inhibit macrophage and DC activation [49] and may also promote IL-10–secreting B and T cells [51]. It is observed that these effects are facilitated mainly by nAbs to the oxidation-associated phosphorylcholine (PC) and malondialdehyde (MDA) neodeterminants on ACMs, which can distinguish healthy versus apoptotic cells [50]. Therefore, nIgM directed against PC and MDA can have two major regulatory functions, enhanced clearance of ACs by phagocytes (termed efferocytosis), and direct suppression of proinflammatory responses induced by agonists for TLR3, TLR4, TLR7, and TLR9 and likely many other innate pathways [49, 50]. In consensus with murine studies, observations in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus highlighted the association of nIgM levels in protection against autoimmunity. For example, decreased levels of anti-PC IgM Abs are characteristic features of active lupus compared with the disease in remission [52]. Therefore, nIgM, through clearance of apoptotic cells, may serve as regulators of the innate immune system to help maintain homeostasis and, in certain cases, suppress the development of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases (reviewed in [53]).
Furthermore, nIgM is also implicated in suppression of disease-associated IgG autoantibody production, since insufficiency of serum IgM may predispose humans for the development of IgG autoantibodies [54]. It has also been argued that the protective effect of IgM may at times involve anti-idiotypic (i.e., targeting of the Ag receptors of some clonally related lymphocytes) downregulation of some autoimmune responses or result from the induction by some IgM anti-idiotypic Abs of apoptotic death of pathogenic B cell clones or the selection of other protective B cell subsets. Another important role of nIgM in tissue homeostasis implicates clearance of altered or malignant cells via complement-dependent cell lysis and induction of apoptosis [55]. The maintenance of tissue homeostasis by nIgM may also involve the enhanced clearance of misfolded proteins, which could have clinical implications for conditions like Alzheimer’s disease in which pathogenesis results from the deposition of misfolded proteins such as β-amyloid plaques in the brain (Fig. 2) (reviewed in [53]).
Normal human plasma contains a substantial amount of nIgM. An IgM-enriched Ig preparation, Pentaglobin®, that contains 12% IgM has been successfully used for treating infections associated with sepsis in patients, as well as transplant rejection, and for certain inflammatory conditions in experimental models [53, 56]. Such preparations may also provide benefits to combat infections that arise in patients with autoimmune disease [57]. Interestingly, a natural human mAb, IgM22, that binds to oligodendrocytes and promotes their remyelination was recently tested in human clinical trial and has demonstrated safe profiles [53].
Natural IgG: Role of nAbs in Immune Tolerance/Homeostasis
As mentioned previously, in addition to nIgM, IgG also constitutes a major portion of nAbs (as nAAbs). There is little information on direct demonstration of the functions of nAbs in immune homeostasis. However, most of the functions that have been attributed to IgG nAbs are deduced from the wide range of observed effects of IVIG when administered to patients with autoimmune and inflammatory situations [29, 58]. IVIG symbolizes a complete repertoire of normal circulating IgG. The distribution of IgG subclasses and IgG glycosylation patterns in IVIG generally overlaps with normal human plasma/serum. Although a single donor might lack certain individual IgG specificities, it is likely to be compensated in IVIG because of pooling of plasma. As IVIG is nothing but pooled IgG from normal donors, the effect of IVIG likely represents a primordial function of circulating nIgG in regulating immune homeostasis [59]. Natural antibodies and natural autoantibodies with low to medium affinity are likely to be the major active components of IVIG, but these specificities are not in high frequencies. Thus, given the altered physiology in autoimmune patients, it is conceivable that these natural autoantibodies are needed at higher amounts than those present in the normal circulation of a donor.
IVIG is prepared from pools of plasma obtained from several thousand healthy blood donors, and hence, IVIG represents a privileged source of nAbs (nAAbs) [60]. Although initially conceived for the IgG replacement therapy of primary and secondary immunodeficiencies, following successful use of IVIG in immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) by Paul Imbach [61], high-dose IVIG (1–2 g/kg) is now used for the immunotherapy of many autoimmune and inflammatory diseases including Guillain–Barré syndrome, Kawasaki disease, myositis, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy, and many others [42, 62, 63]. Newer indications are continuously being explored, and IVIG is currently used in more than 100 different diseases in an off-label manner (Table 2) [42, 58, 64]. As discussed below, numerous mutually non-exclusive mechanisms may play a role in the beneficial effect of IVIG therapy in these diseases. The success of IVIG in these wide-range pathologies provides strong arguments for the therapeutic value of nIgG.
The effective immunotherapy of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases using IVIG also led to the investigation of cellular and molecular mechanisms of action [65]. Autoimmune and inflammatory diseases are characterized by abnormal activation of the cells of innate and adaptive immune compartments and release of inflammatory mediators. The emerging evidence suggests that IVIG targets various arms of the immune system, culminating in inhibition of inflammatory cells and soluble mediators while reciprocally enhancing immune regulatory cells and their functions. Several mechanisms of action for IVIG have been proposed since its first successful therapeutic use in ITP [3]. It was thought initially that IVIG exerts a beneficial effect in autoimmune disease patients via saturation/blockade of Fc receptors on phagocytes such as monocytes and macrophages and reduces the immune complex-mediated activation of these innate cells [59, 66]. In addition, saturation of FcRn (neonatal Fc receptor), a protective receptor that prevents the catabolism of IgG, by IVIG is implicated in accelerated clearance of pathogenic antibodies and has a role at least in the initial phase of ameliorative effects of IVIG [65, 67]. IVIG has also been shown to neutralize pathogenic autoantibodies by anti-idiotypic Abs against idiotypes expressed by disease-associated autoantibodies (to factor VIII, acetylcholine receptor, thyroglobulin, DNA, and others) and by inhibiting autoantibody production by binding to autoreactive B lymphocytes [59, 65, 68]. Further, binding of IVIG to C3b and C4b fragments of complement, thereby inhibiting their tissue deposition as well as generation of the C5 convertase, and hampering the subsequent formation of C5-C9 membrane attack complex, as a consequence, prevents complement-mediated cell death and tissue damage. Additionally, IVIG neutralizes C3a and C5a anaphylatoxins via a F(ab′)2-mediated mechanism [62, 69]. IVIG also contains an array of anti-cytokine antibodies against various inflammatory cytokines, including granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and B cell activating factor (BAFF), that can dampen inflammatory process [59, 70, 71].
Interestingly, F(ab′)2 and Fc portions of IVIG can inhibit lymphocyte (B and T cells) proliferative responses and modulate inflammatory cytokines [63, 72, 73]. In addition, IVIG can also induce apoptosis of mononuclear cells implicating death receptor Fas [74], polymorphonuclear cells via Siglec [75], and also conversely block of Fas in toxic epidermal necrolysis to inhibit apoptosis [76]. IVIG also normalizes the functions of DCs and other innate immune cells [43, 77, 78]. Further, IVIG induces expansion of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and reciprocally inhibits Th17 cells [79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89]. Interestingly, recent studies in mouse models suggest that α(2,6)- sialylated Fc of IVIG signals through type II lectin receptors to enhance inhibitory FcγRIIB on effector macrophages via basophil-secreted IL-4 and induce Tregs by dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing nonintegrin (DC-SIGN)-induced IL-33 secretion [90, 91]. However, translation of these findings to humans failed to recapitulate the mechanisms although requirement for sialylation has been confirmed in other experimental models [78, 79, 82, 83, 88, 89, 92]. Studies in humans have revealed that IVIG can directly interact with basophils to induce IL-4 secretion and can act either directly on Tregs or on DCs to expand Tregs [46, 65, 93,94,95,96].
In summary, IVIG can interfere at all steps of immune response from the early initiation phase to the later effector phase that leads to clinical disease (Fig. 3). Accordingly, binding of nAAbs to antigens contributes to their internalization by antigen-presenting cells and thus modulates the processing of antigens and their subsequent presentation to T cells. Of particular interest for the dissection of the effects of IVIG in autoimmune diseases, it is the role of nAAbs in the inhibition of soluble mediators of inflammation (including complements and cytokines), maintenance of cellular homeostasis, in preventing the expansion of specific autoreactive clones of T and B cells, and in the ability of nAAbs to regulate self-reactivity (pathogenic autoantibodies). Thus, the mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and unlike other specific antibody-based therapies that are either in clinic or in development [97,98,99,100,101,102], a single mechanism might not account for its therapeutic benefit in autoimmune diseases [42, 65, 103].
In line with the immune modulatory effects of IgG and IgM nAbs, other subclasses of normal Igs, particularly IgA, have been explored. Preclinical evaluation of pooled IgA (analogous to IVIG) provided evidence that normal IgA also ameliorates inflammation and hence demands further clinical evaluation [104, 105].
Conclusions
Natural antibodies are distinct from pathogen-specific immune antibodies and pathogenic autoantibodies (Table 3). Notably, nAbs can exert immune modulatory functions as evidenced by activating as well as inhibitory effects based on the host immune status (immunodeficiency versus inflammatory). This phenomenon is similar to the diverse effects of B cells (source of Abs/nAbs) on different immune cells, e.g., DCs, depending on the activation stimuli [106,107,108,109,110]. More than half of the nascent B cells in humans initially express autoreactive antibodies. However, most of these autoantibodies are removed from the repertoire at two checkpoints before maturation into naive B cells. A third checkpoint excludes remaining autoantibodies from the antigen-experienced IgM+ and IgG+ memory B cell pool [111, 112]. Nevertheless, low-affinity self-reactive antibodies of all classes IgM, IgG, and IgA are frequently found in the serum of normal individuals. However, little attention has been paid to their role in immune responses or how their production can be manipulated to the host’s advantage [113, 114]. The inordinate focus on the dogma that high-affinity IgG response is the goal of immunization and that so-called sticky, low-affinity Abs should be avoided is the primary reason for this dearth of information. Recent investigations in the field should lead to more focus on the functions of this first-line component of the adaptive immune response.
References
Macnalty AS (1954) Emil von Behring, born March 15, 1854. Br Med J 1:668–670
Marrack JR (1933) The chemistry of antigens and antibodies. J Phys Chem 38:989–989. https://doi.org/10.1021/j150358a015
João C, Negi VS, Kazatchkine MD, Bayry J, Kaveri SV (2018) Passive serum therapy to immunomodulation by IVIG: a fascinating journey of antibodies. J Immunol 200:1957–1963. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1701271
Black CA (1997) A brief history of the discovery of the immunoglobulins and the origin of the modern immunoglobulin nomenclature. Immunol Cell Biol 75:65–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/icb.1997.10
Dunkelberger JR, Song W-C (2010) Complement and its role in innate and adaptive immune responses. Cell Res 20:34–50. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2009.139
Boyden SV (1966) Natural antibodies and the immune response. Adv Immunol 5:1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2776(08)60271-0
Baumgarth N (2011) The double life of a B-1 cell: self-reactivity selects for protective effector functions. Nat Rev Immunol 11:34–46. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2901
Holodick NE, Rodríguez-Zhurbenko N, Hernández AM (2017) Defining natural antibodies. Front Immunol 8:872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00872
Kawahara T, Ohdan H, Zhao G, Yang YG, Sykes M (2003) Peritoneal cavity B cells are precursors of splenic IgM natural antibody-producing cells. J Immunol 171:5406–5414. https://doi.org/10.4049/JIMMUNOL.171.10.5406
Baumgarth N, Waffarn EE, Nguyen TTT (2015) Natural and induced B-1 cell immunity to infections raises questions of nature versus nurture. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1362:188–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12804
Montecino-Rodriguez E, Dorshkind K (2012) B-1 B cell development in the fetus and adult. Immunity 36:13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2011.11.017
Casali P, Notkins AL (1989) CD5+ B lymphocytes, polyreactive antibodies and the human B-cell repertoire. Immunol Today 10:364–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5699(89)90268-5
Kasaian MT, Ikematsu H, Casali P (1992) Identification and analysis of a novel human surface CD5- B lymphocyte subset producing natural antibodies. J Immunol 148:2690–2702
Griffin DO, Holodick NE, Rothstein TL (2011) Human B1 cells in umbilical cord and adult peripheral blood express the novel phenotype CD20+CD27+CD43+CD70−. J Exp Med 208:67–80. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20101499
Quách TD, Rodríguez-Zhurbenko N, Hopkins TJ, Guo X, Hernández AM, Li W, Rothstein TL (2016) Distinctions among circulating antibody-secreting cell populations, including B-1 cells, in human adult peripheral blood. J Immunol 196:1060–1069. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1501843
Capolunghi F, Cascioli S, Giorda E, Rosado MM, Plebani A, Auriti C, Seganti G, Zuntini R, Ferrari S, Cagliuso M, Quinti I, Carsetti R (2008) CpG drives human transitional B cells to terminal differentiation and production of natural antibodies. J Immunol 180:800–808. https://doi.org/10.4049/JIMMUNOL.180.2.800
Desiderio SV, Yancopoulos GD, Paskind M et al (1984) Insertion of N regions into heavy-chain genes is correlated with expression of terminal deoxytransferase in B cells. Nature 311:752–755
Yang Y, Wang C, Yang Q, Kantor AB, Chu H, Ghosn EEB, Qin G, Mazmanian SK, Han J, Herzenberg LA (2015) Distinct mechanisms define murine B cell lineage immunoglobulin heavy chain (IgH) repertoires. Elife 4:e09083. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.09083
Rechavi E, Lev A, Lee YN, Simon AJ, Yinon Y, Lipitz S, Amariglio N, Weisz B, Notarangelo LD, Somech R (2015) Timely and spatially regulated maturation of B and T cell repertoire during human fetal development. Sci Transl Med 7:276ra25–276ra25. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0072
Coutinho A, Kazatchkine MD, Avrameas S (1995) Natural autoantibodies. Curr Opin Immunol 7:812–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-7915(95)80053-0
Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kaveri SV, Mouthon L, Ayouba A, Malanchère E, Coutinho A, Kazatchkine MD (1998) Self-reactive antibodies (natural autoantibodies) in healthy individuals. J Immunol Methods 216:117–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1759(98)00074-X
Hayakawa K, Asano M, Shinton SA et al (1999) Positive selection of natural autoreactive B cells. Science 285:113–116. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5424.113
Kearney JF, Patel P, Stefanov EK, King RG (2015) Natural antibody repertoires: development and functional role in inhibiting allergic airway disease. Annu Rev Immunol 33:475–504. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120140
Wardemann H, Yurasov S, Schaefer A et al (2003) Predominant autoantibody production by early human B cell precursors. Science 301:1374–1377. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1086907
Feeney AJ (1991) Predominance of the prototypic T15 anti-phosphorylcholine junctional sequence in neonatal pre-B cells. J Immunol 147:4343–4350
Binder CJ, Hörkkö S, Dewan A, Chang MK, Kieu EP, Goodyear CS, Shaw PX, Palinski W, Witztum JL, Silverman GJ (2003) Pneumococcal vaccination decreases atherosclerotic lesion formation: molecular mimicry between Streptococcus pneumoniae and oxidized LDL. Nat Med 9:736–743. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm876
New JS, King RG, Kearney JF (2016) Manipulation of the glycan-specific natural antibody repertoire for immunotherapy. Immunol Rev 270:32–50
Bayry J, Misra N, Dasgupta S, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV (2005) Natural autoantibodies: immune homeostasis and therapeutic intervention. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 1:213–222. https://doi.org/10.1586/1744666X.1.2.213
Kaveri SV (2012) Intravenous immunoglobulin: exploiting the potential of natural antibodies. Autoimmun Rev 11:792–794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2012.02.006
Briles DE, Nahm M, Schroer K et al (1981) Antiphosphocholine antibodies found in normal mouse serum are protective against intravenous infection with type 3 streptococcus pneumoniae. J Exp Med 153:694–705. https://doi.org/10.1084/JEM.153.3.694
Zhou Z-H, Zhang Y, Hu Y-F, Wahl LM, Cisar JO, Notkins AL (2007) The broad antibacterial activity of the natural antibody repertoire is due to polyreactive antibodies. Cell Host Microbe 1:51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2007.01.002
Ochsenbein AF, Fehr T, Lutz C et al (1999) Control of early viral and bacterial distribution and disease by natural antibodies. Science 286:2156–2159. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5447.2156
Heyman B (2000) Regulation of antibody responses via antibodies, complement, and Fc receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 18:709–737. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.18.1.709
Boes M, Prodeus AP, Schmidt T, Carroll MC, Chen J (1998) A critical role of natural immunoglobulin M in immediate defense against systemic bacterial infection. J Exp Med 188:2381–2386. https://doi.org/10.1084/JEM.188.12.2381
Ehrenstein MR, O’Keefe TL, Davies SL, Neuberger MS (1998) Targeted gene disruption reveals a role for natural secretory IgM in the maturation of the primary immune response. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:10089–10093. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.95.17.10089
Baumgarth N, Herman OC, Jager GC, Brown LE, Herzenberg LA, Chen J (2000) B-1 and B-2 cell-derived immunoglobulin M antibodies are nonredundant components of the protective response to influenza virus infection. J Exp Med 192:271–280. https://doi.org/10.1084/JEM.192.2.271
Boes M (2000) Role of natural and immune IgM antibodies in immune responses. Mol Immunol 37:1141–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-5890(01)00025-6
Panda S, Zhang J, Tan NS, Ho B, Ding JL (2013) Natural IgG antibodies provide innate protection against ficolin-opsonized bacteria. EMBO J 32:2905–2919. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.199
Panda S, Zhang J, Yang L, Anand GS, Ding JL (2015) Molecular interaction between natural IgG and ficolin – mechanistic insights on adaptive-innate immune crosstalk. Sci Rep 4:3675. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep03675
Kaveri SV, Maddur MS, Hegde P, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Bayry J (2011) Intravenous immunoglobulins in immunodeficiencies: more than mere replacement therapy. Clin Exp Immunol 164:2–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2249.2011.04387.x
Roifman CM, Schroeder H, Berger M, Sorensen R, Ballow M, Buckley RH, Gewurz A, Korenblat P, Sussman G, Lemm G (2003) Comparison of the efficacy of IGIV-C, 10% (caprylate/chromatography) and IGIV-SD, 10% as replacement therapy in primary immune deficiency: a randomized double-blind trial. Int Immunopharmacol 3:1325–1333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1567-5769(03)00134-6
Perez EE, Orange JS, Bonilla F, Chinen J, Chinn IK, Dorsey M, el-Gamal Y, Harville TO, Hossny E, Mazer B, Nelson R, Secord E, Jordan SC, Stiehm ER, Vo AA, Ballow M (2017) Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol 139:S1–S46. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACI.2016.09.023
Bayry J, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Donkova-Petrini V, Carbonneil C, Misra N, Lepelletier Y, Delignat S, Varambally S, Oksenhendler E, Levy Y, Debre M, Kazatchkine MD, Hermine O, Kaveri SV (2004) Natural antibodies sustain differentiation and maturation of human dendritic cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:14210–14215. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0402183101
Bayry J, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV (2004) Intravenous immunoglobulin for infectious diseases: back to the pre-antibiotic and passive prophylaxis era? Trends Pharmacol Sci 25:306–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2004.04.002
Bayry J, Fournier EM, Maddur MS, Vani J, Wootla B, Sibéril S, Dimitrov JD, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Berdah M, Crabol Y, Oksenhendler E, Lévy Y, Mouthon L, Sautès-Fridman C, Hermine O, Kaveri SV (2011) Intravenous immunoglobulin induces proliferation and immunoglobulin synthesis from B cells of patients with common variable immunodeficiency: a mechanism underlying the beneficial effect of IVIg in primary immunodeficiencies. J Autoimmun 36:9–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2010.09.006
Maddur MS, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2017) Circulating normal IgG as stimulator of regulatory T cells: lessons from intravenous immunoglobulin. Trends Immunol 38:789–792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2017.08.008
Elliott MR, Ravichandran KS (2010) Clearance of apoptotic cells: implications in health and disease. J Cell Biol 189:1059–1070. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201004096
Manderson AP, Botto M, Walport MJ (2004) The role of complement in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus. Annu Rev Immunol 22:431–456. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.immunol.22.012703.104549
Chen Y, Khanna S, Goodyear CS, Park YB, Raz E, Thiel S, Gronwall C, Vas J, Boyle DL, Corr M, Kono DH, Silverman GJ (2009) Regulation of dendritic cells and macrophages by an anti-apoptotic cell natural antibody that suppresses TLR responses and inhibits inflammatory arthritis. J Immunol 183:1346–1359. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0900948
Chen Y, Park Y-B, Patel E, Silverman GJ (2009) IgM antibodies to apoptosis-associated determinants recruit C1q and enhance dendritic cell phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. J Immunol 182:6031–6043. https://doi.org/10.4049/JIMMUNOL.0804191
Notley CA, Brown MA, Wright GP, Ehrenstein MR (2011) Natural IgM is required for suppression of inflammatory arthritis by apoptotic cells. J Immunol 186:4967–4972. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1003021
Anania C, Gustafsson T, Hua X, Su J, Vikstroem M, de Faire U, Heimbuerger M, Jogestrand T, Frostegard J (2010) Increased prevalence of vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques and low levels of natural IgM antibodies against phosphorylcholine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther 12:R214. https://doi.org/10.1186/ar3193
Kaveri SV, Silverman GJ, Bayry J (2012) Natural IgM in immune equilibrium and harnessing their therapeutic potential. J Immunol 188:939–945. https://doi.org/10.4049/JIMMUNOL.1102107
Ehrenstein MR, Cook HT, Neuberger MS (2000) Deficiency in serum immunoglobulin (Ig)M predisposes to development of IgG autoantibodies. J Exp Med 191:1253–1258. https://doi.org/10.1084/JEM.191.7.1253
Schwartz-Albiez R, Laban S, Eichmüller S, Kirschfink M (2008) Cytotoxic natural antibodies against human tumours: an option for anti-cancer immunotherapy? Autoimmun Rev 7:491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTREV.2008.03.012
Norrby-Teglund A, Haque KN, Hammarström L (2006) Intravenous polyclonal IgM-enriched immunoglobulin therapy in sepsis: a review of clinical efficacy in relation to microbiological aetiology and severity of sepsis. J Intern Med 260:509–516. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2006.01726.x
Maddur MS, Vani J, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kaveri S, Bayry J (2010) Autoimmunity as a predisposition for infectious diseases. PLoS Pathog 6:e1001077. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001077
Gilardin L, Bayry J, Kaveri SV (2015) Intravenous immunoglobulin as clinical immune-modulating therapy. CMAJ 187:257–264. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.130375
Kazatchkine MD, Kaveri SV (2001) Immunomodulation of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases with intravenous immune globulin. N Engl J Med 345:747–755. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra993360
Seite J-F, Shoenfeld Y, Youinou P, Hillion S (2008) What is the contents of the magic draft IVIg? Autoimmun Rev 7:435–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTREV.2008.04.012
Imbach P, d’Apuzzo V, Hirt A et al (1981) High-dose intravenous gammaglobulin for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in childhood. Lancet 317:1228–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92400-4
Lünemann JD, Nimmerjahn F, Dalakas MC (2015) Intravenous immunoglobulin in neurology—mode of action and clinical efficacy. Nat Rev Neurol 11:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2014.253
Gelfand EW (2012) Intravenous immune globulin in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. N Engl J Med 367:2015–2025. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1009433
Sewell WAC, Kerr J, Behr-Gross M-E, Peter H-H (2014) European consensus proposal for immunoglobulin therapies. Eur J Immunol 44:2207–2214. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201444700
Galeotti C, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2017) IVIG-mediated effector functions in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Int Immunol 29:491–498. https://doi.org/10.1093/intimm/dxx039
Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV (2007) The antiinflammatory activity of IgG: the intravenous IgG paradox. J Exp Med 204:11–15. https://doi.org/10.1084/JEM.20061788
Akilesh S, Petkova S, Sproule TJ, Shaffer DJ, Christianson GJ, Roopenian D (2004) The MHC class I-like Fc receptor promotes humorally mediated autoimmune disease. J Clin Invest 113:1328–1333. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI18838
Rossi F, Dietrich G, Kazatchkine MD (1989) Anti-idiotypes against autoantibodies in normal immunoglobulins: evidence for network regulation of human autoimmune responses. Immunol Rev 110:135–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-065X.1989.tb00031.x
Basta M, Dalakas MC (1994) High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin exerts its beneficial effect in patients with dermatomyositis by blocking endomysial deposition of activated complement fragments. J Clin Invest 94:1729–1735. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI117520
Le pottier L, Bendaoud B, Dueymes M et al (2007) BAFF, a new target for Iintravenous immunoglobulin in autoimmunity and cancer. J Clin Immunol 27:257–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-007-9082-2
Watanabe M, Uchida K, Nakagaki K, Kanazawa H, Trapnell BC, Hoshino Y, Kagamu H, Yoshizawa H, Keicho N, Goto H, Nakata K (2007) Anti-cytokine autoantibodies are ubiquitous in healthy individuals. FEBS Lett 581:2017–2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FEBSLET.2007.04.029
Séïté J-F, Goutsmedt C, Youinou P, Pers JO, Hillion S (2014) Intravenous immunoglobulin induces a functional silencing program similar to anergy in human B cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 133:181–188.e1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.08.042
Séïté J-F, Cornec D, Renaudineau Y et al (2010) IVIg modulates BCR signaling through CD22 and promotes apoptosis in mature human B lymphocytes. Blood 116:1698–1704. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-12-261461
Prasad NK, Papoff G, Zeuner A et al (1998) Therapeutic preparations of normal polyspecific IgG (IVIg) induce apoptosis in human lymphocytes and monocytes: a novel mechanism of action of IVIg involving the Fas apoptotic pathway. J Immunol 161:3781–3790
von Gunten S, Simon H-U (2008) Natural anti-Siglec autoantibodies mediate potential immunoregulatory mechanisms: implications for the clinical use of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg). Autoimmun Rev 7:453–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTREV.2008.03.015
Viard I, Wehrli P, Bullani R et al (1998) Inhibition of toxic epidermal necrolysis by blockade of CD95 with human intravenous immunoglobulin. Science 282:490–493
Bayry J, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Carbonneil C et al (2003) Inhibition of maturation and function of dendritic cells by intravenous immunoglobulin. Blood 101:758–765. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-05-14472002-05-1447
Bayry J, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Delignat S et al (2003) Intravenous immunoglobulin abrogates dendritic cell differentiation induced by interferon-α present in serum from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 48:3497–3502. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.11346
Maddur MS, Othy S, Hegde P, Vani J, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Bayry J, Kaveri SV (2010) Immunomodulation by intravenous immunoglobulin: role of regulatory T cells. J Clin Immunol 30(Suppl 1):S4–S8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-010-9394-5
Kessel A, Ammuri H, Peri R, Pavlotzky ER, Blank M, Shoenfeld Y, Toubi E (2007) Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy affects T regulatory cells by increasing their suppressive function. J Immunol 179:5571–5575. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.179.8.5571
Maddur MS, Rabin M, Hegde P, Bolgert F, Guy M, Vallat JM, Magy L, Bayry J, Kaveri SV (2014) Intravenous immunoglobulin exerts reciprocal regulation of Th1/Th17 cells and regulatory T cells in Guillain-Barre syndrome patients. Immunol Res 60:320–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12026-014-8580-6
Maddur MS, Trinath J, Rabin M, Bolgert F, Guy M, Vallat JM, Magy L, Balaji KN, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2015) Intravenous immunoglobulin-mediated expansion of regulatory T cells in autoimmune patients is associated with increased prostaglandin E2 levels in the circulation. Cell Mol Immunol 12:650–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/cmi.2014.117
Maddur MS, Vani J, Hegde P, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2011) Inhibition of differentiation, amplification, and function of human TH17 cells by intravenous immunoglobulin. J Allergy Clin Immunol 127:823–830.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1102
Maddur MS, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2011) Comparison of different IVIg preparations on IL-17 production by human Th17 cells. Autoimmun Rev 10:809–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2011.02.007
Trinath J, Hegde P, Sharma M, Maddur MS, Rabin M, Vallat JM, Magy L, Balaji KN, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2013) Intravenous immunoglobulin expands regulatory T cells via induction of cyclooxygenase-2-dependent prostaglandin E2 in human dendritic cells. Blood 122:1419–1427. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-11-468264
Othy S, Hegde P, Topçu S et al (2013) Intravenous gammaglobulin inhibits encephalitogenic potential of pathogenic T cells and interferes with their trafficking to the central nervous system, implicating sphingosine-1 phosphate receptor 1-mammalian target of rapamycin axis. J Immunol 190:4535–4541. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1201965
Maddur MS, Sharma M, Hegde P, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2013) Inhibitory effect of IVIG on IL-17 production by Th17 cells is independent of anti-IL-17 antibodies in the immunoglobulin preparations. J Clin Immunol 33(Suppl 1):S62–S66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10875-012-9752-6
Massoud AH, Yona M, Xue D, Chouiali F, Alturaihi H, Ablona A, Mourad W, Piccirillo CA, Mazer BD (2014) Dendritic cell immunoreceptor: a novel receptor for intravenous immunoglobulin mediates induction of regulatory T cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol 133:853–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.029
Bozza S, Käsermann F, Kaveri SV, Romani L, Bayry J (2019) Intravenous immunoglobulin protects from experimental allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis via a sialylation-dependent mechanism. Eur J Immunol 49:195–198. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201847774
Kaneko Y, Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV (2006) Anti-inflammatory activity of immunoglobulin G resulting from Fc sialylation. Science 313:670–673. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129594
Fiebiger BM, Maamary J, Pincetic A, Ravetch JV (2015) Protection in antibody- and T cell-mediated autoimmune diseases by antiinflammatory IgG Fcs requires type II FcRs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E2385–E2394
Schwab I, Mihai S, Seeling M, Kasperkiewicz M, Ludwig RJ, Nimmerjahn F (2014) Broad requirement for terminal sialic acid residues and FcγRIIB for the preventive and therapeutic activity of intravenous immunoglobulins in vivo. Eur J Immunol 44:1444–1453. https://doi.org/10.1002/eji.201344230
Galeotti C, Stephen-Victor E, Karnam A, Das M, Gilardin L, Maddur MS, Wymann S, Vonarburg C, Chevailler A, Dimitrov JD, Benveniste O, Bruhns P, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2019) Intravenous immunoglobulin induces IL-4 in human basophils by signaling through surface-bound IgE. J Allergy Clin Immunol https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACI.2018.10.064
Maddur MS, Stephen-Victor E, Das M, Prakhar P, Sharma VK, Singh V, Rabin M, Trinath J, Balaji KN, Bolgert F, Vallat JM, Magy L, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2017) Regulatory T cell frequency, but not plasma IL-33 levels, represents potential immunological biomarker to predict clinical response to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy. J Neuroinflammation 14:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-017-0818-5
Sharma M, Schoindre Y, Hegde P, Saha C, Maddur MS, Stephen-Victor E, Gilardin L, Lecerf M, Bruneval P, Mouthon L, Benveniste O, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2014) Intravenous immunoglobulin-induced IL-33 is insufficient to mediate basophil. Sci Rep 4:5672. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05672
Sharma M, Das M, Stephen-Victor E, Galeotti C, Karnam A, Maddur MS, Bruneval P, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2018) Regulatory T cells induce activation rather than suppression of human basophils. Sci Immunol 3:eaan0829. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.aan0829
Chan AC, Carter PJ (2010) Therapeutic antibodies for autoimmunity and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol 10:301–316. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri2761
Spirig R, Campbell IK, Koernig S, Chen CG, Lewis BJB, Butcher R, Muir I, Taylor S, Chia J, Leong D, Simmonds J, Scotney P, Schmidt P, Fabri L, Hofmann A, Jordi M, Spycher MO, Cattepoel S, Brasseit J, Panousis C, Rowe T, Branch DR, Baz Morelli A, Käsermann F, Zuercher AW (2018) rIgG1 Fc hexamer inhibits antibody-mediated autoimmune disease via effects on complement and FcγRs. J Immunol 200:2542–2553. https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1701171
Stephen-Victor E, Bayry J (2018) Multimerized IgG1 Fc molecule as an anti-inflammatory agent. Nat Rev Rheumatol 14:390–392. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-018-0013-9
Kiessling P, Lledo-Garcia R, Watanabe S et al (2017) The FcRn inhibitor rozanolixizumab reduces human serum IgG concentration: a randomized phase 1 study. Sci Transl Med 9:eaan1208. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aan1208
Ulrichts P, Guglietta A, Dreier T, van Bragt T, Hanssens V, Hofman E, Vankerckhoven B, Verheesen P, Ongenae N, Lykhopiy V, Enriquez FJ, Cho JH, Ober RJ, Ward ES, de Haard H, Leupin N (2018) Neonatal Fc receptor antagonist efgartigimod safely and sustainably reduces IgGs in humans. J Clin Invest 128:4372–4386. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI97911
Bayry J, Kaveri SV (2018) Kill ‘em all: efgartigimod immunotherapy for autoimmune diseases. Trends Pharmacol Sci 39:919–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tips.2018.08.004
von Gunten S, Shoenfeld Y, Blank M, Branch DR, Vassilev T, Käsermann F, Bayry J, Kaveri S, Simon HU (2014) IVIG pluripotency and the concept of Fc-sialylation: challenges to the scientist. Nat Rev Immunol 14:349–349. https://doi.org/10.1038/nri3401-c1
Saha C, Das M, Patil V, Stephen-Victor E, Sharma M, Wymann S, Jordi M, Vonarburg C, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2017) Monomeric immunoglobulin A from plasma inhibits human Th17 responses in vitro independent of FcαRI and DC-SIGN. Front Immunol 8:275. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2017.00275
Rossato E, Ben Mkaddem S, Kanamaru Y, Hurtado-Nedelec M, Hayem G, Descatoire V, Vonarburg C, Miescher S, Zuercher AW, Monteiro RC (2015) Reversal of arthritis by human monomeric IgA through the receptor-mediated SH2 domain-containing phosphatase 1 inhibitory pathway. Arthritis Rheum 67:1766–1777. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.39142
Morva A, Lemoine S, Achour A, Pers JO, Youinou P, Jamin C (2012) Maturation and function of human dendritic cells are regulated by B lymphocytes. Blood 119:106–114. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-360768
Maddur MS, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2012) Regulation of human dendritic cells by B cells depends on the signals they receive. Blood 119:3863–3864. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2012-02-408948
Maddur MS, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2018) Induction of human dendritic cell maturation by naïve and memory B-cell subsets requires different activation stimuli. Cell Mol Immunol 15:1074–1076. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41423-018-0017-z
Bayry J, Lacroix-Desmazes S, Kazatchkine MD, Hermine O, Tough DF, Kaveri SV (2005) Modulation of dendritic cell maturation and function by B lymphocytes. J Immunol 175:15–20. https://doi.org/10.4049/JIMMUNOL.175.1.15
Maddur MS, Sharma M, Hegde P, Stephen-Victor E, Pulendran B, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2014) Human B cells induce dendritic cell maturation and favour Th2 polarization by inducing OX-40 ligand. Nat Commun 5:4092. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5092
Tiller T, Tsuiji M, Yurasov S, Velinzon K, Nussenzweig MC, Wardemann H (2007) Autoreactivity in human IgG+ memory B cells. Immunity 26:205–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.immuni.2007.01.009
Sabouri Z, Schofield P, Horikawa K, Spierings E, Kipling D, Randall KL, Langley D, Roome B, Vazquez-Lombardi R, Rouet R, Hermes J, Chan TD, Brink R, Dunn-Walters DK, Christ D, Goodnow CC (2014) Redemption of autoantibodies on anergic B cells by variable-region glycosylation and mutation away from self-reactivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:E2567–E2575. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1406974111
Shopsin B, Kaveri SV, Bayry J (2016) Tackling difficult Staphylococcus aureus infections: antibodies show the way. Cell Host Microbe 20:555–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHOM.2016.10.018
Diep BA, Le VTM, Badiou C et al (2016) IVIG-mediated protection against necrotizing pneumonia caused by MRSA. Sci Transl Med 8:357ra124. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aag1153
Funding
Supported by the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Sorbonne Université, Université Paris Descartes France and the Indo-French Center for Promotion of Advanced Research (CEFIPRA) Project 5203-3. The research on intravenous immunoglobulin is supported in part by grants from CSL Behring (France and Switzerland) and Laboratoire Français du Fractionnement et des Biotechnologies, France.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval and Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maddur, M.S., Lacroix-Desmazes, S., Dimitrov, J.D. et al. Natural Antibodies: from First-Line Defense Against Pathogens to Perpetual Immune Homeostasis. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol 58, 213–228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-019-08746-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-019-08746-9