Introduction

Cardiac automaticity refers to spontaneously generated electrical impulses (i.e., action potentials). In the adult heart, it is pacemaker cells in the sinoatrial node that are dedicated to generate impulses to maintain the heart’s rhythmic beating; however, in the fetal heart, all cardiomyocytes (CMs), including ventricular and atrial CMs, have high automaticity and are able to spontaneously fire action potentials (APs) [1]. It is still poorly understood how cardiac automaticity is developed during CM differentiation. Cardiac automaticity is the result of an ensemble of ion currents through sarcolemmal ion channels [2, 3]. Among those ion currents, a pacemaker “funny” current (If), encoded by the hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic-nucleotide gated (HCN)-family of genes [4], is responsible for initiating the diastolic depolarization and determines the rate of spontaneous pacemaker activity [5,6,7]. Overexpression of HCN channels in neonatal ventricular myocytes increases the beating frequency [8], and injection of adenovirus-HCN into the left atrium in vivo induces ectopic pacemaking foci [9, 10]. In contrast, the inward rectifier potassium current (IK1) has been generally thought to play an inhibitory role in the induction of cardiac automaticity [2, 3].

IK1, encoded by Kir2.x genes [11], contains both inward (depolarizing) and outward (hyperpolarizing) current components; the outward component stabilizes the resting membrane potential (RMP) and contributes to the phase-3 repolarization of APs [12,13,14]. IK1 is abundant in the working myocardium of the atrium and ventricle but is low [15, 16] or non-measurable [17] in pacemaker cells of the sinoatrial node. As a stabilizer, IK1 is generally recognized to suppress cardiac automaticity. In a transgenic mouse model, Kir2.1 knockout prolongs the AP duration (APD) and increases the number of ventricular CMs that can spontaneously fire APs [18]. Andersen-Tawil syndrome in humans with episodic cardiac arrhythmias and developmental dysmorphic features are also caused by mutations in Kir2.1 [14, 19]. It has been observed that the low amount of IK1 and high amount of If contribute to the high automaticity of fetal CMs [1, 20, 21] as well as CMs differentiated from mouse (m) and human (h) embryonic stem cells (ESCs) [22,23,24], which have been broadly used to understand mouse and human developmental biology and embryogenesis, including cardiogenesis of pacemaker cells and atrial and ventricular CMs [22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. Our previous study found that overexpression of Kir2.1 facilitates the electrophysiological maturation of m/hESC-differentiated CMs by converting spontaneously AP-firing cells into quiescent-yet-excitable electrophysiological-matured CMs [23]. Meanwhile, the strategy of suppressing IK1 has also been exploited to develop bioengineered pacemakers. Knocking-down Kir2.1 channels in adult ventricular CMs resulted in a depolarization of RMP and induced endogenous pacemaker activity [14, 29], a similar result of developing bio-pacemaker cells from ventricular CMs by overexpression of HCN channels [9, 10]. Interestingly, our studies observed that co-overexpression of Kir2.1 with engineered-HCN1 could further enhance the induced automaticity of ventricular CMs to spontaneously fire APs at a faster rate [30]. Given that If is activated by hyperpolarization, however, the intriguing ability of IK1 to activate If and thereby promote automaticity has not been explored.

In the present study, we first applied a computational mathematical-modeling assay to investigate the synergistic interaction between IK1 and If and found that a combination of IK1 and If was sufficient to induce rhythmic oscillation of membrane potential (MP), which was experimentally replicated in unexcitable HEK293T cells and undifferentiated mouse ESCs. Our electrophysiological study revealed a novel unexpected role of IK1 in promoting the induction of cardiac automaticity in m/hESC-CMs during cardiac differentiation. We also found that acute upregulation of If induced by infection of Ad-CGI-HCN virus inhibited the automaticity of m/hESC-CMs, which is surprisingly different from an increased automaticity of CMs differentiated from a stable HCN4-transgenic mESCs [31], but is consistent with our mathematical-modeling assay.

Materials and Methods

Differentiation and Isolation of Mouse and Human ESC-CMs

D3 cell line of mouse ESCs (ATCC) were cultivated and differentiated into spontaneously-beating CMs by embryoid body (EB)-mediated differentiation [32]. The hES2 human ESCs (ES Cell International [ESI], Singapore) were maintained as previously reported [33]. The hES2 cells were differentiated into CMs by co-culturing with the immortalized endoderm-like END2 cells [26]. To isolate single CMs, beating outgrowths were microsurgically dissected from differentiated hESCs (Day 16 ~ 20) and mouse EBs (Day 7 + 4) by a glass knife, followed by incubating in collagenase solution (1 mg/ml) at 37 °C for 30 min [22, 27, 32]. The isolated cells were incubated with KB solution containing (mmol/L): 85 KCl, 30 K2HPO4, 5 MgSO4, 1 EGTA, 2 Na2-ATP, 5 pyruvic acid, 5 creatine, 20 taurine, and 20 d-glucose, at room temperature for 30 min. After the cells were plated on laminin-coated glass coverslips for 1 h at 37 °C, the culture media was added carefully and refreshed the next day.

Lentivirus- and Adenovirus-Mediated Gene Transfer

Fusion protein of human HCN4GFP or Kir2.1dsRed was inserted into the pLV-EF1α-GFP plasmid to replace GFP at the Pac I and Nde I restriction sites; these two lentiviral plasmids were used to mediate the upregulation of IK1 and If, respectively. The recombinant lentiviruses were produced by transient transfection of HEK293T cells as previously described [22, 24]. Briefly, the lentiviral plasmids pΔ8.91, pMD.G, and pLV-EF1α-gene vector (2:1:3 mass ratio) were co-transfected into HEK293T cells. The supernatants that contain lentiviral particles were harvested at 24- and 48-h post-transfection and stored at -80 °C before use. In the presence of polybrene (6 μg/ml), lentiviral particles with a > 106 titer infected cells with a multiplicity of infection of 3. The fluorescence of GFP or dsRed was used to select positively-transduced cells.

An adenovirus vector of pAd-CMV-GFP-IRES (Ad-CGI) with bioengineered mouse HCN1 (pAd-CGI-HCN) was used to mediate the overexpression of If in m/hESC-CMs as in our previous study [10, 23, 34]. The empty adenovirus was used as the control. Adenoviruses were generated by Cre-lox recombination of purified ψ5 viral DNA and shuttle vector DNA. The recombinant products were plaque-purified, expanded, and concentrated by CsCl gradient, yielding concentrations of 1010 plaque formation unit (PFU)/ml. For transduction, adenoviral particles were added at a concentration of ~2 × 109 PFU [10]. Adenoviral-infected cells were used for electrophysiological characterization within two to four days after adenoviral infection.

Electrophysiological Characterization

Electrophysiological experiments were performed at the single cell level by whole-cell patch-clamp with an Axopatch 200B amplifier and the pClamp10.2 software (Axon Instruments Inc., Foster City, CA) [22,23,24, 35]. Patch pipettes were prepared from 1.5 mm thin-walled borosilicate glass tubes using a Sutter micropipette puller P-97 and had typical resistances of 4–6 MΏ when filled with an internal solution containing (mmol/L): 110 K-aspartate, 20 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 0.1 Na-GTP, 5 Mg-ATP, 5 Na2-phospocreatine, 1 EGTA, 10 HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.3 with KOH. The external Tyrode’s bath solution consisted of (mmol/L): 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 d-glucose, 10 HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.4 with NaOH. Voltage- and current-clamp recordings were performed at 37 °C. The electrode potential was adjusted to zero after immersion of the pipette tip, which caused a positive voltage bias of measured MPs and was corrected with a junction potential (−14.9 mV).

APs were directly recorded from spontaneously-firing m/hESC-CMs by current-clamp without electrical stimulus and were elicited and recorded in quiescent cells with a stimulus of 0.1–1 nA for 5 ms. Based on the parameters of APs (Table 1), m/hESC-CMs were categorized into pacemaker, atrial, or ventricular phenotypes [23, 36]. In brief, ventricular m/hESC-CMs have longer APD, APD50, and APD90 than atrial cells; a ratio of the duration at different levels of 10% repolarization, APD30–40/APD70–80 that indicates “plateau” during phase 2, was used to categorize the cells as atrial (<1.4) or ventricular (≥1.4); the maximum depolarization rate (dV/dTMax) of AP was applied to distinguish pacemaker cells (<5 mV/ms) from atrial and ventricular cells.

Table 1 Parameters of Action Potential Recorded in Human and Mouse ESC-CMs

After AP characterization, IK1 and If were measured in the same cell by switching current-clamp to voltage-clamp recordings. To measure IK1 and If, cells were held at a -30 mV potential and pulsed for 2 s from 0 mV to -140 mV with 10 mV increments of every sweep, followed by a -100 mV pulse for 1 s. IK1 was defined as 1 mmol/L Ba2+-sensitive currents; If was represented by the remaining Ba2+-nonsensitive currents.

Single Cell Real Time RT-PCR

Right after patch-clamp recording of APs, some individual hESC-CMs were manually picked up by the recording pipette and transferred into 0.2 ml PCR tubes for reverse transcription (RT) and pre-amplification of cDNA by using CellsDirect One-Step qRT-PCR kit (Invitrogen) together with pooled primers (Supplemental Table 1). The amplified cDNA samples were diluted 20 times and stored in −80 °C. To evaluate the gene expression of individual hESC-CMs, the standard real time PCR was set up as the product manual of SsoFast™ EvaGreen® Supermixe with low ROX (Bio-Rad), and data were collected and analyzed on an ABI-7500 real time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Ct values were used to indicate the expression of genes. Supplemental Table 1 includes the information of primers.

Immunocytochemistry

Differentiated hESC-CMs (D21) were digested and plated on laminin-coated glass coverslips. Cells were fixed for 15 min at room temperature with methanol-acetone (1:1) mixture. After washing with PBS, cells were incubated with 10% goat serum for 30 min and then incubated with primary rabbit anti-Kir2.1 or anti-HCN4 antibody (Alomone Labs) together with mouse anti-α-actinin monoclonal antibody (Sigma). Alexa Fluor-488 goat anti-mouse IgG and Alexa Fluor-594 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen) were used for fluorescence imaging. Coverslips were mounted onto glass slides in Prolong Gold antifade mountant with DAPI (ThermoFisher). Samples were imaged on a confocal laser-scanning microscope (Leica TCS SP8).

Formulation of a Mathematical Model

A mathematical modeling approach was applied to investigate the systematic coordination of IK1 and If by a well-established mathematical model that was originally established for rabbit SAN pacemaker cells [37]. Rather than nine membrane currents applied in the original model, only IK1 and If, without other ion currents, were included in our single cell model with their typical kinetics. Time-dependent behavior of two currents is described using gating variables obeying first-order Hodgkin-Huxley kinetics. Our model uses the same initial extracellular and cytosolic ion concentrations as that in the original model [37]. MATLAB 6.5 was used to perform the programming assay. Differential equations were solved using the Euler method. A fixed constant step of integration 0.01 ms was used.

Statistical Analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. Statistical significance of differences in means was estimated by unpaired Student’s t test or Chi-square (x 2) test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

IK1-Induced If Activation Programmed Rhythmic Oscillations in in Silico Analysis

Since we recently found that IK1 could promote the spontaneously-firing automaticity induced by upregulation of If in adult ventricular CMs [30]; we first investigated how IK1 and If synergistically interact with each other by mathematical simulation. Without any other ionic currents, only IK1 and If with a typical current-voltage (I-V) relationship (Fig. 1a) were included in a well-established mathematical model that was originally developed for rabbit SAN pacemaker cells [37]. Remarkably, the rhythmic oscillation of MP, a pacemaker-like activity, could be successfully programmed by If and IK1 (Fig. 1b). The MP was oscillating between -80 mV and -35 mV in our simulation assay. In theory, the outward current of IK1 hyperpolarizes MP, which subsequently activates HCN-channels; the inward current of If depolarizes MP, which then activates the outward current of IK1 to hyperpolarize MP again and to induce rhythmic MP-oscillation (Fig. 1c). We termed this mechanistic model IK1–induced If activation. Noticeably, inducing MP oscillation requires a large amount of If and a small amount of IK1, meaning that any small-amount of increased IK1 will require much more If to induce MP oscillation.

Fig. 1
figure 1

The in silico simulation shows that IK1–induced If activation programs rhythmic oscillations of membrane potential (MP). a Representative Current-Voltage (I-V) curves of IK1 (red) and If (green) were applied in the mathematic model. b Only IK1 and If, without other ion currents, were sufficient to program rhythmic oscillations of MP. c A schema illustrates the mechanism of how IK1–induced If activation generates rhythmic oscillation of MP. d A surface contour shows that the ratio of IK1 and If regulates the frequency of rhythmic oscillation

We calculated the oscillation rate after a 10-s simulation of IK1 and If and found that a proper ratio of IK1 and If was critical for the induction of this MP oscillation and controlled the frequency of rhythmic oscillation (Fig. 1d). A specific level of If and IK1 at spot “a” in Fig. 1d could induce a 3 Hz oscillation of MP, which was increased to 4.5 Hz with more IK1 (spot “b”); however, a further increasing of IK1 quickly suppressed the rhythmic oscillation (spot “c”). This result demonstrated that a proper amount of IK1 could help If to accelerate this rhythmic MP oscillation. Interestingly, too much If without a corresponding increase of IK1 suppressed the induction of MP oscillation (spot “d” in Fig. 1d).

Generating Rhythmic Oscillations in Unexcitable Cells by IK1–Induced If Activation

We next investigated if this computational simulation of rhythmic oscillation, driven by IK1–induced If activation, happens in a real biological system. We introduced two fusion proteins––Kir2.1dsRed and HCN4GFP––into unexcitable HEK293T cells by lentiviral transduction (Fig. 2a) and measured a huge IK1 with a big outward current (8.0 ± 6.1pA/pF at -60 mV, n = 8) and an intermediate inward current of If (−3.7 ± 2.0 pA/pF at -60 mV, n = 8) in the Kir2.1dsRed/HCN4GFP-cotransduced cells (Fig. 2b-c). With such a huge IK1, the MP of HEK293T cells that overexpressed Kir2.1 were hyperpolarized to −92.1 ± 0.5 mV (n = 68) and −91.1 ± 1.9 mV (n = 24) with and without the expression of HCN4 channels, respectively (Fig. 2d), while the MP was much more positive in wild-type (−28.2 ± 1.1 mV, n = 21) and HCN4-transduced (−35.3 ± 1.9 mV, n = 19) cells.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pacemaker-like rhythmic oscillations of MP could be generated by IK1 and If in bioengineered HEK293T cells. a Two fusion proteins, HCN4GFP and Kir2.1dsRed, were introduced into HEK293T cells by lentivirus infection. A bar indicates 20 μm. b Representative IK1 and If were recorded in bioengineered HEK293T cells. c I-V curves of IK1 and If in bioengineered Kir2.1dsRed/HCN4GFP HEK293T cells. d The RMP of HEK293T cells with/without infection. **p < 0.01 vs. non-infected cells. e The oscillation of MP was recorded by patch clamp in a bioengineered HEK293T cell co-transduced with LV-HCN4GFP and LV-Kir2.1dsRed, when IK1 was partially inhibited by Ba2+. The inset panel compared the oscillations at two different time points (a and b), showing that an increased IK1 could enhanced the firing rate of oscillations

Remarkably, the MP of HCN4/Kir2.1-co-transduced HEK293T cells was rhythmically oscillating between -85 mV and -35 mV when IK1 was partially blocked by Ba2+ perfusate (40 μmol/L, n = 5 out of 11) or when the blocked IK1 was partially recovered (n = 8 out of 11) by washing out Ba2+ (Fig. 2e). Neither HEK293T cells that overexpressed Kir2.1 alone nor those that overexpressed HCN4 alone could ignite a rhythmic electrical oscillation (Fig. S1), indicating a unique ying-and-yang interaction between IK1 and If. Indeed, this pacemaker-like rhythmic electrical activity driven by IK1 and If could be replicated in undifferentiated mESCs (another unexcitable cell type) (Fig. S2). When Kir2.1dsRed was introduced into mESCs, in which we could record If but not IK1 [35], its MP became hyperpolarized as anticipated (Fig. S2c). Similarly, spontaneous MP-oscillations between -70 mV to -35 mV were observed in Kir2.1-transduced mESCs (n = 3 out of 6) when IK1 was partially blocked by Ba2+. Collectively, our experiments demonstrated that the unique synergistic interaction between IK1 and If is sufficient to program a rhythmic electrical activity in unexcitable cells.

In HCN4/Kir2.1-transduced HEK293T cells, IK1 hyperpolarizes MP and If is the major inward current for depolarization. Given that If is insensitive to millimolar concentrations of external Ba2+ [4], If would be expected to remain largely unchanged while IK1 is modulated by Ba2+ (40 μmol/L) perfusion or wash-out (Fig. 2e). When Ba2+ was administered to quiescent HCN4/Kir2.1 HEK293T cells, IK1 was decreased gradually, yielding rhythmic oscillations of MP (time point “a” of Fig. 2e); when IK1 was further decreased as Ba2+ blockade continued, the firing rate decreased (time point “b”) until the cells subsequently became quiescent at a MP (< −45 mV) that was no longer hyperpolarized by insufficient outward current of IK1 for If-activation. Oscillations were restored during Ba2+ washout when IK1 gradually increased back to the suitable range where IK1-activated If activation takes place. These experiments successfully replicated our computational assay that a synergistic interaction of IK1 and If is sufficient to induce rhythmic MP oscillation.

IK1 Improves the Induction of Cardiac Automaticity of m/hESC-CMs during Differentiation

We next investigated if IK1–induced If activation plays a role in regulating cardiac automaticity and studied the EP properties of m/hESC-differentiated CMs (Table 1). Around half of m/hESC-CMs could spontaneously fire APs, including ventricular and atrial CMs, with the remaining being quiescent-yet-excitable (Fig. 3a-b). We found that the maximum diastolic potential (MDP) of spontaneously-firing ESC-CMs was significantly more hyperpolarized than that of quiescent cells, which, upon electrical pacing, could elicit an AP with a phase 4-like depolarization but failed to elicit subsequent APs. The MDP of quiescent-yet-excitable atrial and ventricular mESC-CMs were −64.8 ± 2.1 mV (n = 19) and −67.5 ± 3.2 mV (n = 13), respectively; while the MDP was more hyperpolarized in spontaneously-firing atrial (−71.5 ± 1.5 mV, n = 13, p = 0.002) and ventricular (−72.4 ± 3.1 mV n = 12, p = 0.026) mESC-CMs (Fig. 3c). The same was also true for hESC-CMs (Fig. 3d and Table 1). We also performed single cell qRT-PCR and confirmed that cells that elicited APs in our patch-clamp recording were all CMs with high expression of cardiac sarcomere genes (i.e. TNNT2, MYH6, MYL7, MYL3) and cardiac ion channels (Fig. 3e). The mRNA expressions of ion channels varied among individual ESC-CMs and had no significant difference between quiescent-yet-excitable and spontaneously-firing cells. We found that HCN4 and KCNJ2 (Kir2.1) were the major channels mediating IK1 and If in hESC-CMs. Consistently, our immunocytochemistry staining confirmed that both HCN4 and Kir2.1 were expressed in hESC-CMs, which had formed typical sarcomere structure (Fig. 3f).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Spontaneously-firing m/hESC-CMs had a more hyperpolarized maximum diastolic potential (MDP). a-b Representative APs of quiescent and spontaneously-firing mouse (a) and human (b) ESC-CMs. c-d The MDP of spontaneously-firing cells were significantly more hyperpolarized than that of quiescent cells in mouse (c) and human (d) ESC-CMs. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. e A heat map of single cell qRT-PCR shows gene expression in individual atrial (a) and ventricular (v) hESC-CMs of our patch-clamp recording. f Immunocytochemistry showed that hESC-CMs formed typical sarcomere structure and expressed HCN4 and Kir2.1. Bars indicate 10 μm

We then measured functional currents of IK1 and If and found that a low amount of IK1 could be measured only in ventricular mESC-CMs (Fig. 4a) and hESC-CMs [23], while If was recorded in all m/hESC-CMs. We found that a bigger If was measured in quiescent cells than in spontaneously-firing mESC-CMs (Fig. 4b), but the stable activation curves of If in both types of cells had no difference (Fig. 4c). However, spontaneously-firing ventricular mESC-CMs (n = 4) had a relatively bigger outward current of IK1 than quiescent-yet-excitable ventricular cells (n = 5, p = 0.04, Fig. 4d), which might be the cause of a relatively positive MDP in quiescent m/hESC-CMs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

A hyperpolarized MP enhanced the automaticity of quiescent m/hESC-CMs. a Representative IK1 and If were recorded in ventricular mESC-CMs. b-c The I-V curve and stable activation curve of If in quiescent (n = 5) and spontaneously-firing (n = 4) ventricular mESC-CMs. d The I-V curve of IK1 showing that spontaneously-firing ventricular mESC-CMs (n = 4) displayed a bigger outward current of IK1 than quiescent-yet-excitable ventricular mESC-MCs (n = 5). e Quiescent mESC-CMs (n = 5) could spontaneously elicit APs when a proper amount of electrode-injected outward current hyperpolarized the MP. f The automaticity of quiescent hESC-CMs (6 out of 8, right) was enhanced to fire APs spontaneously after zacopride treatment. Dash lines indicate 0 mV, ▲ indicates an electrical stimulation

Rather than classical depolarization pacing, we applied a modest outward current to mimic IK1 for hyperpolarizing the MP and investigated whether the low automaticity of quiescent ESC-CMs is caused by the relatively positive MDP. Upon injection of a 30pA outward current, interestingly, the quiescent-yet-excitable mESC-CMs fired APs spontaneously (n = 5) (Fig. 4e). We also treated hESC-CMs with zacopride, which could specifically enhance IK1 in isolated rat CMs without influence on other ion currents [38], to study if the automaticity can be developed in quiescent-yet-excitable ESC-CMs by an increased IK1, after we validated that zacopride (10 μMol/L) had no influence on If (Fig. S3). We found that zacopride could induce automaticity in quiescent-yet-excitable hESC-CMs (6 out of 8 cells) to spontaneously fire APs (Fig. 4f). Our results demonstrated that an increased IK1 could enhance the automaticity of m/hESC-CMs and hyperpolarization of MP is important for the development of cardiac automaticity.

Acute Upregulation of If Inhibited the Automaticity of m/hESC-CMs

Since CMs differentiated from a stable transgenic cell line of mESCs overexpressing HCN4 showed significantly more rapid beating capability [31], we also investigated if bio-engineered pacemaker cells could be developed from differentiated ESC-CMs by an acute upregulation of If. We infected hESC-CMs with adenovirus of Ad-CGI-HCN, which was used to convert quiescent adult ventricular CMs into spontaneously-firing pacemaker-like cells [10, 34]. Ad-CGI-HCN infection significantly increased If in hESC-CMs (Fig. 5a-b). We found that If upregulation had no significant effect on changing atrial or ventricular cell types of hESC-CMs (Fig. 5c). However, the percentage of spontaneously-firing hESC-CMs was significantly decreased from 45.5% in the control (n = 33) to 28.5% (n = 28, p = 0.03) in Ad-CGI-HCN cells (Fig. 5d). The spontaneously-firing rate of Ad-CGI-HCN-transduced ventricular hESC-CMs (34.5 ± 7.0 fpm, n = 8) had no significant difference than that in control cells (35.7 ± 6.3 fpm, n = 9, Table 1). The same result was also observed in mESC-CMs. There was around 46.7% of control mESC-CMs (n = 60) that could spontaneously fire APs; however, most Ad-CGI-HCN–transduced mESC-CMs became quiescent-yet-excitable and only 10.1% of them (n = 69, p = 0.01) could fire APs spontaneously (Fig. 5e) without enhancement of the firing rate (Table 1). These experiments demonstrated that acute upregulation of If inhibited the automaticity of m/hESC-CMs.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Acute upregulation of If suppressed the automaticity of m/hESC-CMs. a Representative traces of If recorded in Ad-CGI- (control) and Ad-CGI-HCN–transduced (HCN) ventricular hESC-CMs. b The I-V curves of If in control and HCN-ventricular hESC-CMs. c Acute upregulation of If didn’t change chamber-specific cell types of hESC-CMs. d-e Acute upregulated If significantly decreased the number of spontaneously-firing cells in human (d) and mouse (e) ESC-CMs. *p < 0.05

Discussion

In this study, we investigated a synergistic interaction of IK1 and If that regulates cardiac automaticity and found that IK1-induced If activation could generate pacemaker-like rhythmic oscillation of MP even in otherwise unexcitable cells. We found that IK1 and If could influence each other in enhancing or suppressing cardiac automaticity. A small amount of increased IK1 could improve the development of cardiac automaticity in m/hESC-CMs through a mechanism of IK1-induced If activation, which is a singular role of IK1 in regulating cardiac automaticity. We also found that acute upregulation of If surprisingly suppressed cardiac automaticity of m/hESC-CMs in which a low amount of IK1 was measured. Our study advances the conventional view of IK1 in regulating cardiac automaticity of spontaneously-firing APs.

As opposed to the dynamic nature of spontaneously-firing cells, the RMP of quiescent cells is highly stable until they get excited and is mostly determined by the concentrations and conductance of different ions across the membrane. Undifferentiated cells show highly variable RMP, which is usually significantly more positive than that of differentiated cells [39]. In our recordings, the RMP was around -30 mV in unexcitable HEK293T cells (Fig. 3c) and -15 mV in undifferentiated mESCs. The normal RMP of adult ventricular CMs is hyperpolarized to -90 mV, mostly due to a constant outward leak of IK1 potassium current through inward rectifier channels [14, 29]. Therefore, the RMP is being gradually hyperpolarized during the differentiation and maturation of CMs. The development of sarcolemmal If plays a major role to initiate a sarcolemmal electrical automaticity of firing APs [5,6,7], which was found being developed earlier than cell contraction during CM-differentiation in chicken embryos [40, 41]. By definition, the activation of If requires a hyperpolarized MP; therefore, hyperpolarization of RMP during CM differentiation is indeed critical for the ultimate development of automaticity in differentiated muscle cells. It has been found that MP hyperpolarization by IK1 is critical for skeletal muscle differentiation from human myoblasts [42]. Consistently, our EP studies found that spontaneously-firing m/hESC-CMs displayed more hyperpolarized MDP than quiescent ESC-CMs (Fig. 4), in which automaticity was enhanced to fire APs spontaneously by an IK1-specific agonist zacopride or an electrode-injected outward current. Therefore, we speculate that quiescients m/hESC-CMs might be less differentiated at an intermediate differentiation stage between spontaneously-firing ESC-CMs and cardiac progenitor/precursor cells. The presence of a small amount of IK1 hyperpolarizes RMP and plays a critical role in developing cardiac automaticity in newly-differentiated CMs through a mechanism IK1-induced If activation. During the later maturation process, a further increased IK1 together with a decreased If suppresses cardiac automaticity in adult ventricular and atrial CMs.

Another possibility that could explain less IK1 measured in quiescient m/hESC-CMs is the vulnerability of IK1 to cell isolation methods [43], which could cause a decreased IK1 in some m/hESC-CMs and consequently led to a suppressed automaticity. However, this explanation also suggests a novel role of IK1 in enhancing cardiac automaticity. Indeed, in contrast to the increased beating frequency of ventricular myocytes, a consistently slower sinus-paced rhythmic heart rate in the Kir2.1-knockout mice [18] may also indicate the possibility that IK1 has a critical role of enhancing cardiac automaticity.

The mechanism of IK1-induced If activation is consistent with previous studies of developing biological pacemakers. The amount and ratio of IK1 and If is critical to eliciting rhythmic electrical activity. Normally, adult cardiac ventricular muscle cells have a large amount of IK1 and a low level of If; therefore, both strategies of down-regulating IK1 [29] and up-regulating If [9, 10] in ventricular CMs could successfully develop bio-engineered pacemaker cells to spontaneously fire APs. Saito et al. established a transgenic cell line of mouse ESCs stably overexpressing HCN4GFP and found that CMs differentiated from HCN4GFP-transgenic mESCs displayed an enhanced automaticity [31]. Although they didn’t categorize mESC-CMs into chamber-specific cell types for the comparison of automaticity, this study still inspired us to develop bio-pacemaker cells from m/hESC-CMs. Unfortunately, acute upregulation of If actually suppressed cardiac automaticity in m/hESC-CMs, which was also observed in atrial CMs [44]. Although it is unknown if a constant overexpression of HCN4 in pervious study [31] or acute overexpression of HCN4 in our current study would influence the expression of immaturity markers in m/hESC-CMs, our study demonstrates that m/hESC-CMs couldn’t be directly converted into bio-pacemaker cells by acute-upregulation of If.

It has been noticed that different ESC lines have distinct cardiogenic preferences [45] and the culturing and differentiation methods of ESCs have a big impact the efficiency and cardiac lineages of CM-differentiation [46], which might possibly influence the expression of cardiac ion channels and subsequently affect the development of cardiac automaticity. This might be an important concern for induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which remain an epigenetic memory of the donor cell source [47]. In our study, we found that IK1-induced If activation could regulate the automaticity of mouse and human ESC-CMs differentiated with two different methods, EB-differentiation and inductive co-culture, indicating a general role of IK1-induced If activation during the development of cardiac automaticity. This is consistent with previous finding that the epigenetic memory of cardiac somatic cell source does not influence the functional outcome of iPSC-differentiated CMs, while it improves cardiac differentiation efficiency [48].

One limitation is that our current study focused on regulating cellular automaticity by the sarcolemmal currents of IK1-induced If activation but didn’t include the influence of intracellular Ca2+ transients, which coordinates together with sarcolemmal ion currents to control cellular automaticity [49, 50]. Recently, Vaidyanathan et al. found that upregulated IK1 could enhance the amplitude of Ca2+ transients in iPSC-CMs [51]; therefore, the automaticity development promoted by IK1-induced If activation might be also mediated partially through intracellular Ca2+ transients. In addition, only Kir2.1 was utilized to study IK1-induced If activation in bioengineered-HEK293T cells. It has been found that Kir2.1 is the major component of murine IK1, but Kir2.2 also contribute to the native IK1 in mouse ventricular CMs [18]. Therefore, It is possible that both Kir2.1 and Kir2.2, or even Kir2.3, contribute to the development of cardiac automaticity in m/hESC-CMs.

In conclusion, our study explored the synergistic interaction between IK1 and If and revealed a singular role of IK1 in the ultimate development of cardiac automaticity in m/hESC-CMs by IK1-induced If activation. Our study provides a more comprehensive understanding of IK1 regulating cardiac automaticity, which will guide us to investigate the role of IK1 in arrhythmogenesis and develop efficient strategies for anti-arrhythmic therapy.