Abstract
The present study was undertaken to explore the effect of administration of high doses of sodium selenite on the apoptosis of lymphoma cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL). Forty patients with newly diagnosed NHL were randomly divided into two groups. Group I received standard chemotherapy, whereas group II received adjuvant sodium selenite 0.2 mg kg−1 day−1 for 7 days in addition to chemotherapy. Flow cytometry was used for monitoring of lymphoma cells apoptosis at the time of diagnosis and after therapy in the two groups. Sodium selenite administration resulted in significant increase in percentage of apoptotic lymphoma cells after therapy in group II (78.9 ± 13.3% versus 58.9 ± 18.9%, p < 0.05). In addition, patients who received sodium selenite treatment demonstrated statistically significant increase in percentage of reduction of cervical and axillary lymphadenopathy, decrease in splenic size, and decreased percentage of bone marrow infiltration. Also, we found a statistically significant decrease in cardiac ejection fraction (CEF) in group I and no reduction in CEF in patients who received sodium selenite ‘group II’, denoting the cardioprotective effect of selenium. It is concluded that sodium selenite administration at the dosage and duration chosen has synergistic effect to chemotherapy in inducing apoptosis and, consequently, could improve clinical outcome.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Selenoproteins play a critical role in a number of biochemical pathways, notably in cellular antioxidant systems such as glutathione peroxidase and thioredoxin reductase [1, 2].
Many studies have reported an association between selenium intake at supranutritional doses or serum selenium concentration and cancer incidence [3] or overall age-adjusted cancer mortality [4].
Studies in animals have described the chemopreventive activity of selenium compounds [5], while clinical trials have also reported the protective effect of selenium supplementation in the development of prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer [6], with the benefit being clearest in prostate cancer [7].
Serum selenium concentration at diagnosis was recently reported to be independently predictive of both treatment response and long-term survival in patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma [8], and selenium administration with chemotherapy resulted in improved overall survival and was effective immunomodulator [9, 10].
Lu et al. [11] have shown that selenite treatment of mouse leukemic L 1210 cells induced DNA single-strand breaks followed by the activation of endonucleases that produced DNA double-strand breaks and the induction of cell death by apoptosis.
Se-induced apoptosis in cancer cells was related to its chemopreventive activity [12], and several groups have shown that selenocompounds induce apoptosis in cell culture systems [13, 14].
These and other findings [15, 16] encouraged researchers to add selenium plus other antioxidants as an adjuvant to the surgical and chemotherapeutic treatment of breast cancer in high-risk patients with promising results; selenium included in a mixture of antioxidants has been reported to induce in vitro alteration in surface phenotype of lymphoma cells. Therefore, it may be considered as a potential therapeutic agent in lymphoma [17].
Taking into consideration the clinical data above, in vivo study of the effects of high-dose sodium selenite administration on apoptosis of lymphoma cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma has been undertaken.
Aim of the Work
The aim of this work was to explore the in vivo effect of high-dose sodium selenite administration on apoptosis in lymphoma cells in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Patients and Methods
Forty adult patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) of intermediate and high grade were selected for the study. The patients were treated at the Hematology Department, Ain-Shams University Hospital, Cairo. Informed consent was obtained from all participants at the beginning of the study.
All patients were subjected to different clinical, laboratory, and radiological investigations for proper diagnosis and staging. Patients were selected to have bone marrow infiltration at presentation.
They were all subjected to flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow lymphoma cells to assess the level of apoptosis during different stages of therapy.
The patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group I (n = 20) were treated by chemotherapy, and group II (n = 20) received chemotherapy and selenium given in the form of sodium selenite.
Therapeutic Protocol
All patients received combination chemotherapy composed of cyclophosphamide doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) used in treatment of intermediate and high-grade NHL. The treatment consisted of 750 mg/m2 on the first day of the treatment cycle (D1) intravenously (IV) cyclophosphamide, 50 mg/m2 IV D1 doxorubicin, 1.4 mg/m2 IV D1 vincristine, and 100 mg po D1 to D5 prednisone. Chemotherapy cycles were repeated every 28 days.
It has been proposed that sodium selenite antagonizes the apoptotic action of doxorubicin [18]. The administration of sodium selenite was postponed until plasma clearance of doxorubicin (t 1/2 = 18–30 h) was achieved [18].
Therefore, sodium selenite was administered on days3–7 of the chemotherapy. Quantification of lymphoma cells apoptosis was done by flow cytometric analysis performed on bone marrow aspirate samples collected on day 0, and eight in patients receiving sodium selenite and on d 0, and eight in patients receiving chemotherapy alone (Table 1).
Sodium selenite anhydrous with purity of about 99% (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a dose of 0.2 mg kg−1 day−1 was dissolved in water and given orally once daily for 5 days [19].
Patients were kept under close observation for appearance of adverse effects such as epigastric pain, vomiting, diarrhea, garlic taste, or any other symptoms and/or signs.
Follow-up with laboratory investigations was done. Sodium selenite was administered to group II patients from days3 to 7 in one cycle only.
The dose and duration of sodium selenite has been a matter of debate. It was determined by means of animal model studies and then escalated to human intake levels without toxic effects. Sodium selenite (Sigma Chemical) was given in an oral daily dose of 0.2 mg Se kg−1 day−1 for 5 days. To avoid possible selenite-induced vomiting, an antiemetic drug was also given to the patients in group II.
During the course of the study, all the patients were subjected to thorough clinical screening, including a complete blood, serum, liver, cerebrospinal, bone marrow, biopsy, immunophenotyping, and histopathological, electrocardiogram, radiological, and echocardiography studies.
In addition, quantification of in vitro apoptosis of lymphoma cells by flow cytometry was conducted.
All of the studies were carried out on bone marrow aspirate before and after chemotherapy in group I patients and after chemotherapy and selenium in group II patients.
Sample Collection
Fresh bone marrow (2 ml) aspirate samples were collected in sterile tubes on heparin for flow cytometric immunophenotyping and analysis of apoptosis.
Mononuclear Cell Separation
Mononuclear cells were separated using Ficoll-hypaque density gradient centrifugation.
Bone marrow aspirates were diluted with phosphate buffer saline (PBS, one part blood to three parts PBS).
Ficoll-hypaque (2 ml) is dispended in conical centrifuge tubes (Sigma Chemicals). Then, 4 ml of diluted blood was carefully layered on the surface, and the tubes were centrifuged at 1,500 rpm for 20 min at room temperature.
The cells were collected from the PBS/ficoll-hypaque interface and washed twice in PBS by centrifugation at 300 rpm for 10 min at 4°C. The cells were counted and adjusted to 2 × 106/ml.
Flow Cytometric Analysis of Apoptosis Using Propidium Iodide Staining
After the second wash, the cells were suspended in 1 ml complete RPMI media (10 ml RPMI 1640 medium + 1 ml fetal calf serum +100 μl antibiotics, streptomycin and penicillin) in a sterile tube.
The cell suspension was poured in a sterile tissue culture plate and then was incubated for 48 h at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator.
The cell suspension in tissue culture plates was transferred to a tube, and 100 μl pepsin (0.5%, pH 1.5) was added to each tube and gently mixed and then was incubated at 37°C for 20 min. After incubation, the cells were washed twice using PBS and then the cell pellet resuspended in 0.5 ml PBS.
RNase solution (0.5 ml, Sigma Chemicals; 1 mg/ml in RBS) was added with gentle mixing followed by addition of 1 ml propidium iodide solution (100 μg/ml in PBS), and the mixture was incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark then kept at 4°C until measured using flow cytometry (Coulter Epics Profile II). The following parameters were measured in 104 cells: log-forward scatter (LFS), integrated fluorescence 3 (FL3), and fluorescence 3 peak (FL3P); the data were displayed on three histograms:
-
Histogram 1:
FL3 versus LFS;
-
Histogram 2:
FL3 versus FL3P;
-
Histogram 3:
FL3.
An electronic gate (Bitmap 1) was drawn on histogram 2 to allow doublet discrimination. The DNA content was assessed as the mean channel number of FL3 on histogram 3.
The red fluorescence photomultiplier voltage was adjusted so that normal control fluoresces at mean channel number 200. Because of the fragmentation of chromatin during apoptosis, the nuclei of apoptotic cells take up less PI than the nuclei of normal cells, and the nuclei were scored apoptotic if they demonstrated a decrease in PI fluorescence relative to the nuclei of healthy non-apoptotic cells (Figs. 1 and 2) [20].
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software for Windows (version 10; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The results were reported as the mean ± SD. The statistical and correlation analysis were carried out with the Mann–Whitney and Spearman’s rank correlation test coefficient, respectively. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
The study population consisted of 40 adult patients with newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of intermediate and high grade. There were 25 men and 15 women. These patients were randomized into two groups according to the therapy received: group I included 20 patients who were treated with conventional chemotherapy, and group II included 20 patients who received conventional chemotherapy in addition to selenium therapy in the form of sodium selenite.
The patients’ characteristics are summarized in Table 2.
Efficacy
There was a statistically significant increase in the percentage of apoptotic lymphoma cells following chemotherapy in both studied groups. However, sodium selenite administration was effective in increasing the percentage of apoptotic lymphoma cells at day 8 following chemotherapy compared to the percentage of apoptotic lymphoma cell in group I (78.9 ± 13.3% versus 58.9 ± 18.9%, p < 0.05, respectively; Table 3).
In addition, statistically significant higher percentage of patients in group II (who received sodium selenite administration) demonstrated statistically significant reduction in cervical and axillary lymphadenopathy, decrease in splenic size, as well as decreased percentage of bone marrow infiltration by lymphoma cells.
Sodium selenite administration was found to be cadioprotective in group II patients as evidenced by a non-statistically significant change in CEF compared to statistically significant reduction in CEF in group I patients (Table 4).
Safety
Sodium selenite administration was associated with garlicky breath odor in 90% of patients and with gastrointestinal upset with nausea and occasional vomiting that was controlled with antiemetics. Other side effects were abated spontaneously except for side effects during continued therapy for 3 months. Side effects are summarized in Table 5.
Discussion
Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, although a potentially curable disease, has a rising incidence throughout the world [21, 22].
Developing a safe and effective therapy for malignancy is the target of many researchers. Selenium is an essential micronutrient in human diet that has a promising role in cancer therapy [23].
Epidemiological and experimental studies have suggested that Se possesses anticarcinogenic properties [24–26].
In this study, the impact of Se administration in mega doses (0.2 mg kg−1 day−1 for 5 days) on lymphoma cells apoptosis was evaluated. Forty adult patients with newly diagnosed NHL were randomly selected and subdivided into two groups. Group I (n = 20) were treated by chemotherapy, and group II (n = 20) received chemotherapy and selenium given in the form of sodium selenite.
Flow cytometry was used for the monitoring of lymphoma cells apoptosis at the time of diagnosis and after therapy in both groups.
Sodium selenite administration resulted in significant increase in percentage of apoptotic lymphoma cells after therapy in group II (78.9 ± 13.3% versus 58.9 ± 18.9%, p < 0.05). In addition, patients who received sodium selenite treatment demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the percentage of reduction of cervical and axillary lymphadenopathy, decrease in splenic size, and decreased percentage of bone marrow infiltration. In addition, we found a statistically significant decrease in CEF in group I and no reduction in CEF in patients who received sodium selenite ‘group II’, denoting the cardioprotective effect of selenium.
The mechanisms by which Se exerts its chemopreventive activity is unknown; however, several plausible explanations have been put forward including the role of Se in inducing cell cycle arrest [27], DNA strand breaks [11, 16], and apoptosis [11, 28].
The control of cell cycle progression plays a key role in cellular growth and differentiation [29–30]. Se induces cell cycle arrest at different phases depending on the chemical form of Se and the cell type [31, 32].
The inhibitory effect on cell proliferation, with a preference for tumor cells versus non-transformed cells, is considered to be a mechanism for the anticarcinogenic capability of Se [33]. Se-induced apoptosis in cancer cells was related to its chemopreventive activity [12], and several groups have shown that selenocompounds induce apoptosis in cell culture systems [11, 13, 14].
Apoptosis is a suicide process essential for development, maintenance of tissue homeostasis, and elimination of unwanted or damaged cells [34] with characteristic morphological features that include nuclear membrane breakdown, chromatin condensation and fragmentation, cell membrane blebbing, and the formation of apoptotic bodies [35].
Se modulates cellular activities presumably by acting on the functions of many intracellular proteins important for signal transduction [1, 36, 37].
However, the modulatory functions of selenite and other Se compounds on intracellular signaling pathways are not fully characterized.
NF-κB is constitutively upregulated in many cancers, including lymphomas, and targeting NF-κβ has shown clinical activity in this setting [38]. NF-κB is also involved in the cellular response to oxidative stress and plays a role in chemosensitivity [39, 40]. A decrease in NF-κβ activity is reported to overcome chemoresistance in many malignancies [41].
In a recent study by Juliger et al. [42] using a panel of human B cell lymphoma cell lines, the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., doxorubicin, etoposide, 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide, melphalan, and 1-B-d-arabinofuranosylcytosine) were increased by up to 2.5-fold when combined with minimally toxic concentrations (EC5–10) of the organic selenium compound, methylseleninic acid (MSA). DNA strand breaks were identified using comet assays, but the measured genotoxic activity of the combinations did not explain the observed synergistic effects in cell death. However, minimally toxic (EC10) concentrations of MSA induced a 50% decrease in nuclear factor-KB (NF-KB) activity after an exposure of 5 h, similar to that obtained with the specific NF-KB inhibitor, BAY 11-7082. Combinations of BAY 11-7082 with these cytotoxic drugs also resulted in synergism, suggesting that the chemosensitizing activity of MSA is mediated, at least in part, by its effects on NFKB [42].
Gopee et al. [43] determined the role sodium selenite plays on intracellular signaling, including protein kinase C (PKC), nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), and inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) in murine B lymphoma (A20) cells. In vitro supplementation of A20 cells with low concentrations of sodium selenite (0.005–5 μM) caused a significant increase in cellular proliferation exclusively at 72 h. Proliferation and cell viability were decreased in response to selenium concentrations of >25 μM and >5 μM at 72 and 96 h, respectively. Flow cytometric analysis of A20 cells exposed to 5 μM Se at 72 and 96 h indicated G2-M phase arrest and increased cell death at higher concentrations.
Se-induced cytotoxicity was associated with apoptosis indicated by nuclear fragmentation and DNA laddering. Se concentrations, which induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, were associated with inhibition of cytosol to membrane translocation of PKC-δ and PKC activity at 72 h. Co-incubation of cultures with 0.5-μM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and Se (5 and 25 μM) reversed the Se-induced cell death at 72 h. The nuclear NF-κB translocation and NF-κB DNA binding were inhibited by increasing concentrations of Se (5 and 25 μM) at 72 h. After 72 h exposure to 5 and 25 μM Se, cIAP-2 concentration was decreased.
Differential inhibition of PKC-δ, NF-κB, and cIAP-2 by Se may represent important intracellular signaling processes through which Se induces apoptosis and subsequently exerts its anticarcinogenic potential [43].
In our previous work [9], fifty patients with newly diagnosed NHL were randomly divided into two groups. Group A-I received standard chemotherapy, whereas group A-II received adjuvant sodium selenite 0.2 mg kg−1 day−1 for 30 days in addition to chemotherapy. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to assess Bcl-2 at the time of diagnosis and after therapy in the two groups. Sodium selenite administration resulted in significant decline of Bcl-2 level after therapy in group A-II (8.6 ± 6.9 vs 6.9 ± 7.9 ng/ml, p < 0.05). Furthermore, complete response reached 60% in group A-II compared to 40% in group A-I. It is concluded that sodium selenite administration at the dosage and duration chosen acts as a downregulator of Bcl-2 and improves clinical outcome [9].
Philchenkov et al. [44] studied apoptosis and cell cycle distribution of MT-4 cells exposed to inorganic selenium compounds assessed by flow cytometry upon propidium iodide staining. Bax expression was analyzed by flow cytometry of cells labeled with anti-Bax monoclonals. Extent of DNA damage was assessed by Comet analysis. Sodium selenite induced apoptosis in dose-dependent mode starting from concentrations of 10 μM, while sodium selenate was much less toxic, inducing apoptotic cell death only at 300 μM. Sodium selenite, but not sodium selenate, caused a slight arrest in G2/M phase of cell cycle.
DNA damaging effects visualized in DNA Comet assay accompanied the cytotoxicity of sodium selenite. Nevertheless, the drastic increase in Bax flow cytometry intensity was evident only in selenite-induced apoptosis. So, increased Bax expression could be another mechanism by which sodium selenite induced apoptosis [44].
Last et al. [45] investigated the activity of two selenium species, MSA and selenodiglutathione (SDG), in a panel of human lymphoma cell lines and in a primary lymphoma culture system and concluded that both compounds demonstrated cytostatic and cytotoxic activity with EC50 values in the range 1.0–10.2 μM. Cell death was associated with an increase in the sub-G1 (apoptotic) fraction by flow cytometry and was not preceded by any obvious cell cycle arrest. SDG, but not MSA, resulted in marked increases in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS), particularly in CRL2261 and SUD4 cells in which the cytotoxic activity of SDG was partly, or completely, inhibited by n-acetyl cysteine, suggesting a dependence on ROS for activity in some cells. Both MSA and SDG showed a concentration-dependent reduction in percentage viability after a 2-day exposure in primary lymphoma cultures, with EC50 values in the range 39–300 and 9–28 μM, respectively. Therefore, the selenium compounds MSA and SDG induce cell death in lymphoma cell lines and primary lymphoma cultures, which, with SDG, may be partly attributable to the generation of ROS [45].
Xiang et al. [46] in an in vitro study use LNCaP cells which were transduced with adenoviral constructs to overexpress four primary antioxidant enzymes: manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), copper–zinc superoxide dismutase (CuZnSOD), catalase (CAT), or glutathione peroxidase 1 (GPx1).
The MTT assay, chemiluminescence, flow cytometry, Western blot analysis, and Hoechst 33342 staining following overexpression of these antioxidant enzymes analyzed cell viability, apoptosis, and superoxide production induced by sodium selenite and concluded that: (1) selenite induced cancer cell death and apoptosis by producing superoxide radicals; (2) selenite-induced superoxide production, cell death, and apoptosis were inhibited by overexpression of MnSOD, but not by CuZnSOD, CAT, or GPx1; and (3) selenite treatment resulted in a decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential, release of cytochrome c into the cytosol, and activation of caspases 9 and 3, events that were suppressed by overexpression of MnSOD [46].
Taken together, these data encourage the further development of selenium as a potential modulator of cytotoxic drug activity in non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas.
References
Allan CB, Lacourciere GM, Stadtman TC (1999) Responsiveness of selenoproteins to dietary selenium. Annu Rev Nutr 19:1–16
Thomson CD (2004) Assessment of requirements for selenium and adequacy of selenium status: a review. Eur J Clin Nutr 58:391–402
Clark LC, Cantor KP, Allaway WH (1991) Selenium in forage crops and cancer mortality in U.S. counties. Arch Environ Health 46:37–42
Schrauzer GN, White DA, Schneider CJ (1977) Cancer mortality correlation studies—III: statistical associations with dietary selenium intakes. Bioinorg Chem 7:23–31
El-Bayoumy K (2001) The protective role of selenium on genetic damage and on cancer. Mutat Res 475:123–139
Clark LC, Combs GF Jr, Turnbull BW et al (1996) Effects of selenium supplementation for cancer prevention in patients with carcinoma of the skin. A randomized controlled trial. Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Study Group. JAMA 276:1957–1963
Duffield-Lillico AJ, Dalkin BL, Reid ME et al (2003) Selenium supplementation, baseline plasma selenium status and incidence of prostate cancer: an analysis of the complete treatment period of the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer Trial. BJU Int 91:608–612
Last K, Maharaj L, Perry J et al (2003) Presentation serum selenium predicts for overall survival, dose delivery, and first treatment response in aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 21:2335–2341
Asfour IA, Fayek M, Raouf S, Soliman M, Hegab HM, El-Desoky H, Saleh R, Moussa MAR (2007) The impact of high-dose sodium selenite therapy on Bcl-2 expression in adult non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients: correlation with response and survival. Biol Trace Elem Res 120(1–3):1–10 (Dec)
Asfour IA, El Shazly S, Fayek MH, Hegab HM, Raouf S, Moussa MAR (2006) Effect of high-dose sodium selenite therapy on polymorphonuclear leukocyte apoptosis in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Biol Trace Elem Res 110(1):19–32 (April)
Lu J, Kaeck M, Jiang C, Wilson AC, Thompson HJ (1994) Selenite induction of DNA strand breaks and apoptosis in mouse leukemic L1210 cells. Biochem Pharmacol 47:1531–1535
Kim T, Jung U, Cho DY, Chung AS (2001) Se-methylselenocys-teine induces apoptosis through caspase activation in HL-60 cells. Carcinogenesis 22:559–565
Cho DY, Jung U, Chung AS (1999) Induction of apoptosis by selenite and selenodiglutathione in HL-60 cells: correlation with cytotoxicity. Biochem Mol Biol Int 47:781–793
Shen HM, Yang CF, Ong CN (1999) Sodium selenite-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis in human hepatoma HepG2 cells. Int J Cancer 81:820–828
Jiang XR, Macey MG, Lin HX, Newland AC (1992) The antileukemic effects and the mechanism of sodium selenite. Leuk Res 16(4):347–352
Wilson AC, Thompson HJ, Schedin PJ, Gibson NW, Ganther HE (1992) Effect of methylated form of selenium on cell viability and the induction of DNA strand breakage. Biochem Pharmacol 43:1137–1141
Lockwood K, Moesgaard S, Hanioka T, Folkers K (1994) Apparent partial remission of breast cancer in high-risk patients supplemented with nutritional antioxidants. Mol Aspect Med 15(Supple):231–240
Asfour IA, El Koaly MN, Kachour KR, Fathy O (1996) Clinical utility of plasma selenium levels and glutathione peroxidase activity in the follow up of adult lymphoma patients, Egypt. J Hematol 21(Suppl.):477–497
Yu SY, Zhu YJ, Li WG, Huang QS, Huang CZ, Zhang QN, Hou C (1991) A preliminary report on the intervention trials of primary liver cancer in high-risk populations with nutritional supplementation of selenium in China. Biol Trace Elem Res 29(3):289–294 (Jun)
Emlen W, Nieber J, Kadera R (1994) Accelerated in vitro apoptosis of lymphocytes in patients with SLE. J Immunol 152:3658–3691
Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, Thun MJ (2004) Cancer statistics. Cancer J Clin 54:8–29
Fisher SG, Fisher RI (2004) The epidemiology of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Oncogene 23(38):6524–6534
Rayman MP (2005) Selenium in cancer prevention: a review of the evidence and mechanism of action. Proc Nutr Soc 64(4):527–542 (Nov)
Combs GF Jr, Gray WP (1998) Chemopreventive agents: selenium. Pharmacol Ther 79:179–192
El-Bayoumy K, DeVita V, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (1991) The role of selenium in cancer prevention. In: DeVita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer principles and practice of oncology. 4th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1–15
Stadtman TC (1996) Selenocysteine. Annu Rev Biochem 65:83–100
Sinha R, Said TK, Medina D (1996) Organic and inorganic selenium compounds inhibit mouse mammary cell growth in vitro by different cellular pathways. Cancer Lett 107:277–284
Lanfear J, Fleming J, Wu L, Webster G, Harrison PR (1994) The selenium metabolite selenodiglutathione induces p53 and apoptosis: Relevance to the chemopreventive effects of selenium? Carcinogenesis 15:1387–1392
Pines J (1994) The cell cycle kinases. Semin. Cancer Biol 5:305–313
Pines J (1995) Cyclins, CDKs and cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 6:63–72
Menter DG, Sabichi AL, Lippman SM (2000) Selenium effects on prostate cell growth. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:1171–1182
Zeng H (2002) Selenite and selenomethionine promote HL-60 cell cycle progression. J Nutr 132:674–679
Ip C, Thompson HJ, Ganther HE (2000) Selenium modulation of cell proliferation and cell cycle biomarkers in normal and premalignant cells of the rat mammary gland. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 9:49–54
Thompson CB (1995) Apoptosis in the pathogenesis and treatment of disease. Science 267:1456–1462
Cryns V, Yuan J (1998) Proteases to die for. Genes Dev 12:1551–1570
Gopalakrishna R, Chen ZH, Gundimeda U (1997) Selenocompounds induce a redox modulation of protein kinase C in the cell, compartmentally independent from cytosolic glutathione: Its role in inhibition of tumor promotion. Arch Biochem Biophys 348:37–48
Spyrou G, Bjornstedt M, Kumar S, Holmgren A (1995) AP-1 DNA-binding activity is inhibited by selenite and selenodiglutathione. FEBS Lett 368:59–63
Adams J (2002) Preclinical and clinical evaluation of proteasome inhibitor PS-341 for the treatment of cancer. Curr Opin Chem Biol 6:493–500
Aggarwal BB (2004) Nuclear factor-nB: the enemy within. Cancer Cell 6:203–208
Turco MC, Romano MF, Petrella A, Bisogni R, Tassone P, Venuta S (2004) NF-nB/Rel-mediated regulation of apoptosis in hematologic malignancies and normal hematopoietic progenitors. Leukemia 18:11–17
Nakanishi C, Toi M (2005) Nuclear factor-nB inhibitors as sensitizers to anticancer drugs. Nat Rev Cancer 5:297–309
Juliger S, Goenaga-Infante H, Lister TA, Fitzgibbon J, Joel PS (2007) Chemosensitization of B-cell lymphomas by methylseleninic acid involves nuclear factor-KB inhibition and the rapid generation of other selenium species. Cancer Res 67(22):10984–10992
Gopee VN, Johnson JV, Sharma PR (2004) Sodium selenite-induced apoptosis in murine B-lymphoma cells is associated with inhibition of protein kinase C-δ, nuclear factor-κB, and inhibitor of apoptosis protein toxicological. Science 78:204–214
Philchenkov A, Zavelevich M, Khranovskaya N, Surai P (2007) Comparative analysis of apoptosis induction by selenium compounds in human lymphoblastic leukemia MT-4 cells. Exp Oncol 29(4):257–261
Last K, Maharaj L, Perry J, Strauss S, Fitzgibbon J, Lister TA, Joel S (2006) The activity of methylated and non-methylated selenium species in lymphoma cell lines and primary tumours. Ann Oncol 17:773–779
Xiang N, Zhao R, and Zhong W (2008) Sodium selenite induces apoptosis by generation of superoxide via the mitochondrial-dependent pathway in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. doi:10.1007/s00280-008-0745-3
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asfour, I.A., El-Tehewi, M.M., Ahmed, M.H. et al. High-Dose Sodium Selenite Can Induce Apoptosis of Lymphoma Cells in Adult Patients with Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Biol Trace Elem Res 127, 200–210 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-008-8240-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-008-8240-6