Introduction

Cancer is the second largest cause of death. According to GLOBOCAN 2020, the International Agency for Research on Cancer had reported global predictions of cancer incidence and mortality to be around 19.3 million and 10 million in 2020 [1]. Among all cancers, breast cancer is the second most common cause of mortality among women around the world with about 2.1 million new cases and 627,000 deaths in 2018. Among the 2.3 million new cancer cases reported in 2020, breast cancer had overtaken lung cancer as the main cause of global cancer incidence, accounting for 11.7% of all cancer cases [1].

Breast cancer is a physiologically and clinically varied condition with numerous identified histological and molecular subtypes, each of them has its own causation, risk factor profiles, treatment responses and prognoses [2]. It has been known to affect the women indifferently. Exogenous hormone, genetic predisposition and variables altering endogenous hormone levels causing early menarche, later menopause, nulliparity, late age at first birth, having fewer children, shorter lactation periods, high mammographic breast density, anthropometric characteristics and benign breast diseases are all implicated in the development of breast cancer [3]. Also, dysregulation in the signalling pathways involving in the growth of the cells also has a pivotal role in cancer development.

Finding drugs that can modify specific targets has been a major focus of drug research in the cancer field. Despite the development of several novel medications with specific targets, resistance patterns, poor safety profiles and limited treatment efficacy are frequently reported. Owing to these problems, attempts have been undertaken to find combinatorial therapies using new medications and to generate various synergistic effects. This approach to drug design has been supported by successful clinical studies using multicomponent therapies [4].

Among various signalling cascades, mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 signalling pathways have a significant role in delivering the extracellular signals to intracellular destinations. These extracellular signals are transduced by ERK/MAPK signalling cascade influencing the production of transcription factors that promote cytoskeleton deformation and increase tumour growth and metastasis [5]. Due to the pivotal role of ERK-1/2 signalling pathway, ERK disorders may result in cell injury and immoderate stimulation of upstream proteins and kinases which persuade various ailments [6]. Affliction in Ras-ERK-1/2 cascade is a key stimulus for the onset of many cancers. Thus, impeding the expression of this pathway can reduce tumour cell growth, migration and apoptosis [7].

Sulforaphane (4-methylsufinyl-3-butenyl isothiocyanate; SFN) is an isothiocyanate found especially in the seeds of Raphanus sativus [8]. It has been used to treat a wide range of human malignant tumours for a long time. ITCs proved to have a great deal of potential as anti-cancer agents in recent pharmacological studies against HCT-116, LoVo and HT-29 colon cancer cells in a dose-dependent manner [9]. SFN has been linked to a number of different anti-cancer effects, including the activation of apoptosis, arrest of cell cycle and prevention of angiogenesis and metastasis [10, 11]. Several studies have found that combining SFN with a traditional chemotherapy medication (such as cisplatin or doxorubicin) increases apoptosis.

Also, biochanin A (C16H1205), an isoflavone found in Trifolium pratense, is a distinctive anti-cancer drug target cancer cells while also disrupting various signalling pathways. Research works have shown that biochanin A can encourage the excretion of terminal cholesterol products and assist in lowering blood sugar and fat, blood pressure and liver tissue lipid levels [12]. It also possesses antiviral, antioxidant, anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory and endothelial integrity and function protecting properties [13]. BCA shows potential as a phytochemical that suppresses breast cancer by stimulating the proliferation of oestrogen receptor-positive cells.

With all the above said reports, the present work focuses on examining the anti-proliferative efficacy of sulforaphane, biochanin A and their co-treatment in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) through various qualitative and quantitative analyses. The work also involves determining the molecular mechanistic approach behind the combinatorial efficacy of sulforaphane and biochanin A in apoptotic induction.

Materials and Methods

Maintenance of Cells

Breast cancer cells (MCF-7) were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) supplemented with L-glutamine and balanced salt solution (BSS) adjusted to contain glucose, Na2CO3, sodium pyruvate, non-essential amino acids, l-glutamine, HEPES and foetal bovine serum (GIBCO, USA). Penicillin and streptomycin (100 IU/100 µg) were also provided. The cells were maintained at 5% CO2 in a humidified CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C.

Cytotoxicity Assay

Cell viability was determined by using MTT assay after treatment with various concentrations of SFN and BCA along with selected concentrations of the combined drugs. MCF-7 and MCF-10A cells were trypsinised, seeded in a 96-well plate (1 × 104 cells/well) and allowed to adhere overnight. They were then treated with designated compounds over 24 h. Then, 10 µL of MTT was added to each well, and the plates were incubated for another 4 h at 37 °C. After removal of MTT containing medium, the formazan crystals formed were dissolved in 100 µL DMSO which was added to each well and the plates were agitated at 37 °C for 10 min before the absorbance of the coloured solution was measured at 550 nm using a microplate reader. The cell viability was then calculated.

$$\%\;\mathrm{viability}=(\mathrm{OD}\;\mathrm{value}\;\mathrm{of}\;\mathrm{experimental}\;\mathrm{sample}/\mathrm{OD}\;\mathrm{value}\;\mathrm{of}\;\mathrm{experimental}\;\mathrm{control})\times100.$$

Drug Interaction Analysis

Using CompuSyn software, the effectiveness of combinatorial treatments and their interactions was assessed (version 1.0). Combination index (CI) values below 1 suggest synergism, over 1 imply additive action and more than 1 show antagonistic behaviour between drugs.

Morphological Analysis

Morphological analysis was carried out to analyse the anti-apoptotic effects of the selected drug combination of BCA and SFN against MCF-7 cells. Cells were seeded in the 6-well culture plates and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, the cells were observed for alteration in their morphological changes with trinocular inverted phase contrast microscope (Lawrence & Mayo).

Fluorescence Microscopic Analysis

AO/EB staining was carried out to detect morphological evidences of apoptosis. The cells were treated with selected drug combination of BCA and SFN for 24 h. The cells were washed with PBS and 10 µL of acridine orange/ethidium bromide solution was added and incubated for 5 min. Then, the cells were washed with PBS and examined under fluorescence microscope with an excitation filter of 480 nm [14].

Nuclear Fragmentation Analysis

The MCF-7 cells were allowed to grow on a glass coverslip in a six-well plate and treated with selected drug combination of BCA and SFN for 24 h. The treated cells were fixed using methanol:acetic acid (3:1, v/v) and then washed with PBS. They were then subsequently stained using 10 µL DAPI (4′,6- diamidino-2-phenylindole) and kept in dark for 20 min followed by observation under a fluorescence microscope [15].

ROS Assay

MCF-7 cells (1 × 105/mL) were seeded to grow in a 6-well plate for 24 h. Following this, the cells were incubated with selected drug combination of BCA and SFN for 6 h. Then, the cells were subjected to 10 µM of DCFH-DA (2,7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate, HiMedia) staining at 37 °C for 20 min in order to measure the production of ROS in the BCA and SFN co-treated cells. Then, the collected cells were washed with PBS and were monitored under a fluorescent microscope [16].

Cell Cycle Analysis Assay

MCF-7 cells (1 × 105/mL) were grown in a 6-well plate for 24 h at 37 °C (5% CO2). Then, the medium was with selected drug combination of BCA and SFN for 24 h. Subsequently, the cells underwent 24 h of incubation and were collected by utilising trypsin followed by fixing in 70% ethanol and were stored at 20 °C for 1 h. The cells were suspended in 0.5 mL PBS supplemented with 50 mg mL1 PI and 100 mg mL−1 RNase and were incubated for 30 min. Then, using a BD FACS flow cytometer, flow cytometry was done in duplicate, and from each sample, 10,000 events were taken and fluorescence signal intensity was documented and analysed by CellQuest and ModiFit.

Cell Migration Assay

A cluster suspension of MCF-7 cells was seeded in six-well plate containing medium. After 24 h of seeding, the inserts were removed and scratches with images were taken using a phase contrast inverted microscope. Furthermore, the A-549 cells were cultured for about 8 and 24 h. Cell migration in the MCF-7 cells was assessed by determining the cell-free surface at the commencement of the experiment (T0) and the surface concealed by the cells at the completion of the experiment with the help of the ImageJ software. The results are stated in each condition as wound closure percentage.

Protein Expression Analysis

In order to determine how the BCA and SFN combination affected the apoptotic and anti-apoptotic proteins in the treated and untreated cells, western blotting was used. The chosen medication combinations of BCA and SFN were used to treat the MCF-7 cells for 24 h in a 100-mm culture dish. The media was then removed, and the cells were repeatedly washed with PBS. The cells were then treated with lysis buffer for over 20 min. After that, the supernatant was centrifuged and used as protein extracts from the cells. On a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, the exact same amount of protein was run from each concentration of the sample. The proteins were successively transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, blocked for 1 h with 10% skim milk in water and then released. Primary antibodies against ERK-1/2, p-ERK-1/2 and β-actin were added at a v/v ratio of 1:1000 after washing with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20. The primary antibodies were removed by washing following an overnight incubation at 4 °C, and the secondary antibodies were added. After 1 h of incubation at room temperature, the protein bands could be seen [16].

Statistical Analysis

All the experiments were done in triplicate. The data were analysed by SPSS software. The outcomes were recorded as mean ± SD. Statistical examination was achieved using GraphPad 5.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc.). A value of P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MTT Assay

The goal of the study was to identify how well the BCA and SFN work together in breast cancer cells (MCF-7) and normal cells (MCF-10A). It was assessed by means of MTT analysis. The effects of BCA and SFN in breast cancer cells were examined in monotherapy as well as in combination. Compared to individual treatments and the control, we noticed a dose-dependent reduction in the cellular viability of treated cancer cells, which was also found to be more significant with the administration of combinations of drugs together. Table 1 and Fig. 1 show the viability of cells at the selected and treated dose, while the normal cells had not shown any significant changes in the viability of the compound-treated cells (Fig. 1).

Table 1 IC50 values of BCA, SFN, BCA + SFN and doxorubicin
Fig. 1
figure 1

MTT analysis shows the viability of cells at the co-administration of compounds BCA and SFN—A MCF-7 cells; B MCF-10A cells

Drug Interaction Analysis

In order to know about the drug interaction between the designated drugs (BCA and SFN), interaction analysis was done with the CompuSyn software. With the obtained results, the drug combination therapy (BCA and SFN) had shown synergistic effects which is responsible for the reducing the cell proliferation in MCF-7 cancer cells (Table 2).

Table 2 Combination index values for BCA-SFN (1:1)

Morphological Analysis

The morphological analysis of the MCF-7 cells was assessed with phase contrast microscope, and the efficiency of administration of compounds at different concentrations has been analysed. It has been seen from Fig. 2a to d that the control cells are found to be normal in their morphological appearance while treatment groups had undergone significant change in their morphology showing alteration including cell shrinkage, blebbing and detachment of cells from the surface. These changes were found to be more significant in the treatment groups with higher concentration, i.e. in a dose-dependent manner of combinatorial treatment. Thus, it has been evinced that BCA and SFN in combination had ameliorated the breast cancer with its anti-cancer activity in a dose-dependent manner.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Morphological changes observed by phase contrast microscopy—a control; b cells treated with 10 µM of BCA and SFN; c cells treated with 20 µM of BCA and SFN; d cells treated with 30 µM BCA and SFN. Magnification bar: 50 μm

AO/EtBr Staining

The alterations between viable and apoptotic cells can be detected by fluorescence microscopy following AO/EtBr and DAPI staining. AO/EtBr has been used to detect apoptotic bodies which have been occurred during the process of apoptosis. The co-treatment of MCF-7 cells with BCA and SFN had significantly increased the cellular death in a dose-dependent manner in comparison to control cells as shown in Fig. 3. The active live cells emit green fluorescence; pro-apoptotic and late apoptotic cells show yellowish orange fluorescence on treatment; and dead cells emit red colour. Thus, it has been displayed that the cell death was induced by BCA and SFN co-treated cells in a dose-dependent manner.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Cells stained with AO/EtBr and observed under fluorescence microscope—a control; b cells treated with 10 µM of BCA and SFN; c cells treated with 20 µM of BCA and SFN; d cells treated with 30 µM BCA and SFN. Magnification bar: 50 μm

DAPI Staining

To observe the nuclear morphological changes following exposure to BCA and SFN, the cells were stained with DAPI. The result obtained from Fig. 4 depicts the nuclear fragmentation and condensation effect occurred due to the co-treatment of BCA and SFN. With an excitation wavelength of 488 nm, DAPI staining had shown reduced intensity in the control cells while the co-treatment cells have shown increased intensity signifying the effect of BCA and SFN in DNA fragmentation with dose-dependent manner. Thus, it has been proved that with the combined treatment of BCA and SFN, these effects have been concurrently increased as depicted by Fig. 4.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Nuclear changes of MCF-7 cells observed using DAPI staining—a control; b cells treated with 10 µM of BCA and SFN; c cells treated with 20 µM of BCA and SFN; d cells treated with 30 µM BCA and SFN. Magnification bar: 50 μm

ROS Assay

In order to determine the ROS production in BCA and SFN co-treated MCF-7 cells, the cells were subjected to DCFH-DA staining as shown in Fig. 5. The BCA and SFN co-treatment had shown a profuse increase in ROS production in a dose-dependent way in the treated MCF-7 cells. This result indicates the apoptogenic activity of both BCA and SFN synergistically, activating mitochondrial dysfunction in the treated cells in a concentration-dependent manner.

Fig. 5
figure 5

ROS analysis to determine the production of ROS—a control; b cells treated with 10 µM of BCA and SFN; c cells treated with 20 µM of BCA and SFN; d cells treated with 30 µM BCA and SFN. Magnification bar: 50 μm

Analysis of Cell Cycle

To explore the efficacy of compounds BCA and SFN in inhibition of cell cycle, this analysis was done. The treated cells were subjected to cell cycle analysis and the results are shown in Fig. 6. In the untreated control, the cells were distributed in the S and G1 phase of the cell cycle. Consequently, following the co-treatment BCA and SFN at different concentrations, the percentage of cells in the G0/G1 phase had underwent a significant reduction in the cell cycle at higher concentration (58.32%). These results depict the interference of the BCA and SFN in S-phase of the cell cycle which may lead to the apoptosis of cancer cells.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Cell cycle analysis assay on combinatorial treatment. a Control; b cells treated with 10 µM of BCA and SFN; c cells treated with 20 µM of BCA and SFN; d cells treated with 30 µM BCA and SFN

Cell Migration Assay

The migration and invasion abilities of MCF-7 cells on co-administration with BCA and SFN were measured with transwell migration assay. The transwell chambers are coated with Matrigel to detect cell invasion. It was found that the number of invading cells in the co-treatment group was significantly decreased compared to that in the control as depicted in Fig. 7. These results highlight the significant inhibition ability of BCA and SFN in co-treatment.

Fig. 7
figure 7

Cell migration assay to determine the cell migration and invasion—a control; b cells treated with 10 µM of BCA and SFN; c cells treated with 20 µM of BCA and SFN; d cells treated with 30 µM BCA and SFN

Protein Expression Analysis

In order to better understand the mechanisms underlying our above findings, we investigated the changes in expression of an important protein ERK-1/2 on the combinatorial treatment of SFN and BCA and the results has been depicted in Fig. 8. Our findings revealed a considerable dose-dependent down-regulation of ERK-1/2 protein in the combinatorial drug treated groups. Thus, the combined treatment of BCA and SFN on the MCF- 7 cells have synergistically inhibit the cell proliferation and promote apoptosis by inhibiting or deregulating the ERK-1/2 signalling pathway and therefore, this novel combination could be a promising potential therapeutic approach for breast cancer treatment.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Expression of ERK-1/2 protein by western blot analysis in MCF-7 cells treated with combination of BCA and SFN

Discussion

Breast cancer is an aggressive cancer that has a greater relapse incidence than other cancers in women and is resistant to chemotherapeutics. The development of breast cancer is a multi-step process involving multiple cell types, and its prevention remains challenging in the world [17]. In order to establish a viable treatment efficacy against breast cancer, many researchers are trying to comprehend its metabolic and molecular environment. One among the therapeutic approach is the use of phyto-based bioactive molecules with higher efficiency.

The isothiocyanate SFN has been identified as an effective chemotherapeutic agent and for treating breast cancer. Various studies demonstrated the molecular mechanisms induced by the SFN (isothiocyanate) in inducing apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation and migration in breast cancer [18]. In numerous tumours, including cervical cancer, epidermal squamous cell carcinoma, prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer, SFN coupled with cisplatin enhanced apoptosis and reduced cell proliferation. Also, it is an effective anti-cancer drug for the treatment of CRC in people based on these findings [19, 20]. The primary isoflavone found in red clover is biochanin A (Trifolium pratense). According to reports, it possesses anti-inflammatory, anti-carcinogenic and antioxidant benefits that are all good for your health. Moreover, it has been claimed to have tumour-suppressive properties in cases of gastrointestinal, prostate and breast malignancies [21].

The above findings were found to be correlated with our results when given as monotherapy. Our results also depict that though both BCA and SFN are known to have anti-carcinogenic properties individually [18, 21], their efficacy is slightly higher with lower concentration when given in a combination treatment. In the present study, it was demonstrated that the co-treatment with BCA and SFN synergistically enhanced the induction of apoptosis and inhibition of proliferation in MCF-7 cells in vitro in a lower concentration when compared to monotherapy.

Further fluorescent dyes like AO/EtBr and DAPI are also used to determine the manner of cellular death and cell morphological alterations produced by combined treatment of BCA and SFN. Apoptosis is essential for regulating equilibrium. Previous reports had highlighted the efficacy of epigallocatechin gallate and sulforaphane in inhibiting the ovarian cancer cells, while withaferin A and sulforaphane inhibit the breast cancer cells in a significant way [22]. Similarly, the epigallocatechin gallate and sulforaphane had found to inhibit the ovarian cancer cell growth by inhibiting the G2/M phase of the cell cycle by combinatorial approach [22]. Also, biochanin A and ginsenoside had synergistically reduced the growth of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells [23].

Also, reactive oxygen species (ROS) plays an important role in tissue homeostasis, cellular signalling, differentiation and survival [24]. The results obtained from ROS assay showed that the MCF-7 cells co-treated with BCA and SFN at different concentration cells are known to produce increased number of ROS when compared to control group. The SFN and BCA are known to prevent cell migration which is the major threat for the spread of cancer to different parts of the body [25]. It has been reported that the biochanin A and ginsenoside had synergistically reduced the invasive ability of MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast cancer cells in vitro, thus reducing its migration ability [23].

Among all signalling pathway, ERK signalling cascade plays an important role in various physiological functions in cells including survival, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis and metabolism. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway is the core of signalling network involved in regulating cell growth, development and division [26]. Deregulation of the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade is a hallmark for driving tumorigenesis in many types of human cancers. Elevated ERK expression has been detected in various human tumours, such as ovarian, colon, breast and lung cancer. ERK/MAPK signalling pathway can promote the transformation of normal cells into tumour cells. Therefore, increased activation of ERK/MAPK signalling pathway may be closely related to the occurrence and development of tumours [27]. In previous studies, SFN and BCA are known to induce apoptosis by inhibiting ERK-1/2 pathway [28, 29].

Additionally, the combinatorial treatment had induced the down-regulation of expression of this pathway, which had inhibited the proliferation of cells significantly when compared to the monotherapy treatment [30]. Previous studies revealed that SFN and BCA are known to inhibit the ERK-1/2 pathway by reducing the H-Ras, p-Raf, p-MEK and p-ERK protein levels in the ERK cascade [28, 29]. In addition, BCA and SFN could block the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signalling pathways in human breast cancer cells [31]. Our results were found to be correlated with the above said findings, and further in vivo studies have to be done in order to explore them further.

Conclusion

In summary, this study had discussed the function of combined BCA and SFN in the suppression of cancer at lower concentrations. Our findings showed that in terms of reducing cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis and causing cell cycle arrest, the combination treatment (SFN and BCA) had the greatest impact, followed by compounds that were given singly and the control. Additionally, the down-regulation of important cell proliferation players like ERK-1/2 was enhanced by the combination treatments. Furthermore, future research should focus on understanding additional anti-cancer mechanisms in the control of metastasis and cancer stemness as well as the consumption of these combined phytodrugs for breast cancer patients.