Abstract
The fecal flora consists of trillions of bacteria influencing human health and several host factors. Such population-based fecal flora studies are critical to uplift the health status of ethnic tribes from Arunachal Pradesh. This study aimed to analyze the ethnic tribe’s biofilm producing antibiotic resistant bacteria and their phyllogenetic analysis in 15 stool samples collected from Adi tribes of Arunachal Pradesh. Of the analyzed samples, 42.85% were Escherichia, 20% lactic acid bacteria, 20% Salmonella, and 17.14% Enterococcus. Escherichia coli, lactic acid bacteria, and Enterococcus sp. emerged as strong biofilm producers; however, Salmonella declined to exhibit characters for a strong biofilm producer. Tetracycline resistance dominated in all the gut bacterial profiles. The 16SrRNA amplified PCR product was used for sequencing, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed exhibiting the relationship between the isolates. The test sequences were compared with the non-redundant Gene bank collection of the database with the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Antibiotic-resistant bacteria have created problems due to dissemination [14] and possessing high resistance even to newer antimicrobials such as carbapenems and faropenem [13], which has become a severe threat in therapeutic options. In India, the burden of antibiotic-resistant bacteria is relatively high due to the rapid and prolonged use of antibiotics. Antibiotic-resistant bacteria can also produce biofilms, making them resistant to antibiotics and then developing human infections [9]. Biofilm is an accumulation of microorganisms on the surface in which cells are stuck with each other, and a matrix of polymeric substances is produced [43]. This increase in strength within the community is a public health concern with the direct clinical implication in the therapeutic option. Fecal flora such as Escherichia, Salmonella, lactic acid bacteria, and Enterococcus can harbor antibiotic reservoir genes in the human gut. This resistant gene can be transferred from commensal flora to pathogenic microorganisms [7, 34]. Therefore, the urgent need is to understand the prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in a healthy community. Many works have been carried out to recover antibiotic-resistant bacteria from different parts of the world [6, 20]. However, tribal people of Arunachal Pradesh of Northeast India (NE) remain uncharacterized. These people live in a remote area and have never been exposed to modern antibiotics. The only possible way to contact antibiotic-resistant bacteria is to ingest soil bacteria accidentally, which may be naturally resistant to these drugs. Therefore, the present study was aimed to determine the frequency, biofilm production, and molecular basis analysis of phylogeny properties of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria from healthy tribal people from Arunachal Pradesh.
Materials and Method
Sampling Criteria
A total of 15 stool samples were collected from Adi tribes of Arunachal Pradesh from healthy individuals without any gastrointestinal disorder. Individuals who had not taken any antibiotics for at least 6 months before the sampling period and belonged to the age group of 20–60 years (both male and female) were included in the study. The stool samples were collected in sterile collection tubes, put into an icebox, and transported to the laboratory, where the stool samples were kept at −80 °C. Details of the volunteers’ dietary habits, age, and physical status were recorded as per their respondents (Table 1).
Culture-Dependent Isolation
The collected stool samples were inoculated on to lactose broth and brain heart infusion broth and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C in BOD incubator. To isolate and study the morphological characteristics, samples were streaked on a HiCrome Universal Differential Medium, brain heart infusion agar, MacConkey agar, Salmonella Differential Agar (Twin Pack), Raj Hans Medium, and Lactobacillus MRS Agar. The isolates’ phenotypic characters were studied concerning their shape, size, and Gram staining properties followed by a series of standard biochemical tests (IMVIC).
Antibiotic Susceptibility Test
Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion antibiotic susceptibility profiling was performed on the Muller Hinton agar [36] against commonly used antibiotics (HiMedia, India) towards all the isolated strains from Adi tribes’ stool samples. Therefore, to determine the susceptibility patterns [16, 17, 26, 44] of the isolates, ampicillin, ciprofloxacin, tetracycline, gentamicin, aztreonam, meropenem, ertapenem, cefepime, chloramphenicol, ceftazidime, cotrimoxazole, vancomycin, erythromycin, oxacillin, and ceftriaxone were used, respectively. Response to each antibiotic showed by the microbial isolates was categorized as resistant and sensitive to each antibiotic drug. A chi-square test was done for this categorical dataset, and data were considered significantly different at p < 0.05. All the data were analyzed by using the SPSS 21.0 software package.
In Vitro Biofilm Assay
All the recovered isolated colonies were subjected to the in vitro biofilm assay by the Congo Red Agar and tube method.
Congo Red Agar Method
Brain heart infusion agar and sucrose and Congo red stain (aqueous solution) were prepared separately, autoclaved, and mixed with agar as a supplement when the temperature reached 55 °C. The prepared Congo Red Agar (CRA) was then poured into sterile Petri plates and allowed to solidify. The plates were streaked and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h [42]. Interpretation of the results was recorded as strong, moderate, and weak. The appearance of black dry crystalline colonies on the CRA plates was classified as strong biofilm producer, while red or pink colonies were classified as weak biofilm producer and dark colonies, but the absence of crystalline colonial morphology was classified as intermediate biofilm producer.
Tube Method
The CRA method’s positive isolates were further analyzed by in vitro biofilm production test by tube method as previously described [5] with slight modifications. Test organisms inoculated in Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h. The decanted tubes were then washed with phosphate buffer saline, followed by air-drying at room temperature. Staining with 4% crystal violet was performed. De-ionized water was used to remove excess stain, and the tubes were dried by placing them in an inverted position. The interpretation was recorded according to the visibility of a number of films lining the wall and the bottom of the tube as weak/none, moderate, and high/strong. Those isolate that produced three film linings in the wall of the test tube were classified as strong; two or one film lining in the wall was classified as intermediate, while those isolates that produced film lining in the bottom of the tube was classified as a weak biofilm producer. The experiment was performed in triplicates, and the tubes were compared with control strains.
DNA Extraction
Extraction of DNA was performed for only those isolates expressing their resistance towards antibiotics by boiling method [22]. A colony of overnight grown culture was taken into a microcentrifuge tube containing TE (Tris-EDTA) buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0; 1 mM EDTA, 0.1 ml), vortexed and incubated in a water bath at 95 °C for 10 min followed by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 pm.
PCR Amplification of the 16SrRNA Gene
PCR reactions were carried out for antibiotic resistance Escherichia sp., lactic acid bacteria, and Enterococcus sp. in a gradient thermocycler (Eppendorf, USA). The primers used were 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and U1492R (5′-GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3′) [37]. A reaction mixture of 12.5μl Taq polymerase, 1μl of each forward and reverse primer, 8.5 μl of nuclease-free water, and 2μl of DNA template was taken in each tube. The PCR reaction conditions were set in as initial DNA denaturation for 5 min at 94 °C, 35 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 94 °C, annealing for 1 min at 55 °C, and elongation for 1 min at 72 °C with a final extension for 5min at 72 °C.
A 5 μL of the PCR product was then electrophoreses in 1% agarose gel, at 100 V for 30 min, followed by staining with 1% solution of ethidium bromide (50 μL/L) and destaining with TBE (Tris-borate-EDTA ) 1× for 10 min. UV trans-illumination then visualized the band sizes, and the image was captured in Gel Doc.
Sequence Analysis
The 16SrRNA amplified PCR product was used for sequencing with 27F and U1492R primer. The sequenced data were then analyzed using NCBI (National Centre for Biotechnology Information) and BLAST (Basic local alignment search tool) for highly significant matches. MEGA 7 software was used to construct the phylogenetic tree.
Strains Used for Quality Control:
For quality control, E. coli ATCC 25922 was used as a control strain for antibiotic susceptibility profiling. A Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 and Staphylococcus epidermis 12228 were used as reference strains for positive biofilm and negative biofilm control strain.
Statistical Analysis
The statistical software package SPSS version was used to analyze the antibiotic resistance shown by different isolates. A chi-square test was applied where p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Prevalence of Aerobic Culture-Dependent Isolates
Based on microscopic observations and cultural characteristics, a total of 35 isolates were recovered aerobically from stool samples of healthy individuals. Of these 35 isolates, 15 (42.85%) confirmed to be Escherichia sp., 6 (17.14%) Enterococcus sp., 7 (20%) Salmonella sp., and 7 (20%) isolates as lactic acid bacteria. The above isolates’ biochemical characterization revealed that Escherichia spp. expressed themselves as gram-negative rods and were catalase, indole, methyl red, motility test–positive and shown in oxidase Voges Proskauer and citrate utilization tests as negative. Enterococcus spp. expressed themselves as gram-positive cocci and Voges Proskauer test–positive; Salmonella spp. expressed as gram-negative rods and catalase and methyl red test–positive while lactic acid bacteria expressed themselves as gram-positive rods and methyl red test–positive.
Since the Adi tribe is distinct and unique in its tradition and food habits, it mainly consumed fermented bamboo shoots, smoked fish and meat, and home-prepared alcohol, popularly known as Apong.
Antibiotic Susceptibility Test
Phenotypically confirmed isolates were further screened against commonly used antibiotics, and it was observed that 13% (2/15) of Escherichia spp. were resistant towards tetracycline and 100% susceptible towards aztreonam, meropenem, cefepime, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, ertapenem, chloramphenicol, and ceftazidime. Similarly, Salmonella sp. was 100% susceptible towards cotrimoxazole, gentamicin, ampicillin, tetracycline, and ciprofloxacin; lactic acid bacteria were 100% susceptible towards erythromycin, gentamicin, ampicillin, and 28.57% (2/7) resistant towards tetracycline and 14.28% (1/7) towards vancomycin, while Enterococcus sp. was 50% (3/6) resistant towards tetracycline followed by 33.33% (2/6) towards vancomycin and 16.67% (1/6) towards erythromycin, and 100% susceptible towards ampicillin, oxacillin, and gentamicin. After statistical analysis, it was observed that Escherichia sp. and lactic acid bacteria were significantly different at p < 0.05. Enterococcus sp. did not show any significance (p = 0.087). However, no statistical analysis was performed against Salmonella sp. since it did not show any resistance. Antibiotics susceptibility profiling for all the isolates is summarized in Table 2.
Biofilm Assay
Using the biofilm assay, both antibiotic-resistant and resistant isolates were screened using the tube method and the Congo Red Agar method. It was observed that in the CRA method, out of 15 Escherichia isolates, 13.33% (2/15) were strong biofilm producers, 40% (6/15) were weak biofilm producers, and 46.66 (7/15) were non-biofilm producers. Salmonella spp. were observed as 14.28% (1/7) intermediate biofilm producers and 85.71% (6/7) as non-biofilm producers; lactic acid bacteria were observed as 28.57% (2/7) strong biofilm producers, 42.85% (3/7) as intermediate biofilm producers, and 14.28% as weak biofilm producers, while Enterococcus spp. were observed as 33.33% (2/6) strong biofilm producers, 50% (3/6) as intermediate biofilm producers, and 16.66%(1/6) as weak biofilm producers (Fig. 1).
In the tube method, all the isolates expressed themselves as highly strong biofilm producers compared to those in the CRA method. Escherichia spp. represented themselves as 20% (3/15) strong biofilm producers, 6.66% (1/15) as intermediate biofilm producers, and 73.33% (11/15) as weak biofilm producers; lactic acid bacteria showed 71.42% (5/7) as strong biofilm producers and 28.57% (2/7) as intermediate biofilm producers; Enterococcus spp. showed 66.66% (4/6) as strong biofilm producers and 33.33% (2/6) as weak biofilm producers, while in Salmonella spp., only 14.28% (1/7) were weak biofilm producers and the rest of them are non-biofilm producers (Fig. 2).
16SrRNA Gene Amplification by PCR and Sequence Analysis
The phylogenetic analysis was performed only for antibiotic-resistant Escherichia sp., lactic acid bacteria, and Enterococcus sp. The results revealed that Escherichia sp. belongs to the genera Escherichia coli; lactic acid bacteria belong to Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus faecalis, and Enterococcus durans. Enterococcus sp. belongs to Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. The 16S rRNA gene sequence–based phylogenetic tree for the isolates Ad06 and Ado1 was constructed, exhibiting the relationship between the isolates. The evolutionary history was inferred using the neighbor-joining method [29]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.01537371 is shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) was shown above the branches [12]. The tree is drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Tajima-Nei method [38] and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The analysis involved eight nucleotide sequences. Codon positions included were the 1st + 2nd + 3rd + noncoding. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 1376 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA 7 [18] (Fig. 3).
Similarly, the evolutionary history of the isolates of lactic acid bacteria, LAB8, LAB7, LAB5, and LAB 2, was prepared by using the neighbor-joining method [29]. The sum of the branch length = 0.84222741 was shown. The percentage of replicate trees in which the associated taxa clustered together in the bootstrap test (1000 replicates) was shown above the branches [12]. The isolates LAB8, LAB7, LAB5, and LAB2, which were isolates from Adi tribe stool samples in the present study, were closely related to the source of semolina and intestinal tracts of young people. The results revealed that LAB7 belongs to Enterococcus faecalis, and LAB2, LAB5, and LAB8 belong to Enterococcus durans (Fig. 4).
The evolutionary history was also prepared for Enterococcus isolates [29]. The optimal tree with the sum of branch length = 0.08889978 was shown. The strain Enterococcus sp. belonged to the genera Enterococcus faecalis, which was closely related from the source of the fish intestine and murine cecal content (Fig. 5).
Discussion
The emergence of antibiotics-resistant bacteria among the healthy population has become a serious condition in therapeutic options. Therefore, the present study aimed to study the Adi tribal people of Arunachal Pradesh. Since this, people follow the ancient lifestyle. The study recorded a total of 35 isolates that were dominated by different groups of bacteria belonging to Escherichia sp. 15/35 (42.85%), lactic acid bacteria 7/35 (20%), Salmonella sp. 7/35 (20%), and Enterococcus sp. 6/35 (17.14%). High recovery of Escherichia sp. observed in the present study expressed the close contacts of the Adi tribes with domestic animals and consuming their raw milk from the collection container that may be contaminated with poor quality of water [3]. Lactic acid bacteria that dominate the human stool are believed to elucidate beneficial effects in the human host and are regarded as transient strains that originate in food and pass through the intestinal tract [39], but the present study recorded only 20% (7/35) prevalence rate of these strains in the Adi tribes [26]. The low prevalence rate for Salmonella sp. 7/35 (20%) was also recorded among this tribe, and such low occurrences of Salmonella sp. in the fecal microbiota of Adi tribes may be due to the consumption of raw vegetables or aquatic environment that acts as a source [2, 23]. Enterococci are the most common gastrointestinal organisms which have been documented as the vast majority of healthy individuals, but the present study recorded a low prevalence of Enterococcus sp. 6/35 (17.14%). The current results are in contrast to the reports [1, 15] that mention the record of all the isolates was positive for Enterococcus sp. recovered from stool samples of healthy humans.
Phenotypic resistance profiles of Escherichia sp., lactic acid bacteria, Salmonella, and Enterococcus sp. obtained from healthy individuals from Adi tribes of Arunachal Pradesh were studied where Escherichia sp. exhibited high resistance (13%) towards tetracycline and 100% susceptibility towards the antibiotics aztreonam, meropenem, cefepime, gentamicin, ceftriaxone, ertapenem, chloramphenicol, and ceftazidime. Though differences in resistant rates in our results and other coworkers are observed in Escherichia coli isolates studied in Ujjain (37%), southern India, and eastern India (35%) [28, 31, 33], a similar resistance pattern was noted [3] mentioning that the occurrence of 16.8% of E. coli resistance towards tetracycline is in agreement to the present study. Furthermore, it was observed that high doses of tetracycline antibiotics within the Adi tribes were due to their frequent uses in backyard animal husbandry practices, aquaculture, and poultry farming. Lactic acid bacteria were observed to be highly susceptible (100%) towards erythromycin, gentamicin, and ampicillin and showed its resistance towards tetracycline at 28.57% and resistivity towards vancomycin at 14.28%. In contrast to the above findings, reports have shown that lactic acid bacteria are susceptible towards erythromycin, tetracycline, and vancomycin [17], but there are also few reports documenting Lactobacilli to possess a high natural resistance towards vancomycin, a property that is useful in distinguishing them from other Gram-positive bacteria [11, 17, 24]. Enterococcus sp. was observed to be highly resistant towards tetracycline at 50%, followed by vancomycin at 33.33% and erythromycin at 16.67%. All the isolates exhibited 100% susceptibility towards ampicillin, oxacillin, and gentamicin [10, 25]. Furthermore, Salmonella sp. did not exhibit any resistance towards any of the above antibiotics. Such variations observed in antibiotics resistance patterns may be due to geographical differences [4, 40].
The human gut microbiome constitutes various nutritional and physiochemical environment [19], which may contribute to the formation and survival of biofilms. Microbial biofilms pose multiple serious infections by protecting the constitute bacteria from antibiotics and host immune effects. The present study revealed that Escherichia coli, Salmonella, lactic acid bacteria, and Enterococcus sp. had the ability to form biofilms from the Adi tribe stool samples [21, 30, 32, 41]. The isolates that were observed as strong biofilm producers colonized and exhibited their resistance properties towards antibiotics [27, 43].
16SrRNA sequencing is regarded as the standard gold method for the identification of bacteria. When compared with the non-redundant gene bank collection of the database with BLAST, the test sequences revealed that antibiotic resistance isolates from the Adi tribe of Arunachal Pradesh belonged to genera Enterococcus hirae, Enterococcus durans, Enterococcus faecalis, and Escherichia coli. The present study findings agree with the previous reports in which Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus hirae were the most prevalent isolates from feces of Thai newborns [8, 35]. Subsequently, coworkers [37] have also reported that Escherichia coli are the most common strains isolated from human stools. The present study data also revealed that antibiotic-resistant isolates from Adi fecal microbiota tribe possessed a similarity to that of the goat milk and fish intestine microbiota. Such similarity observed may be due to the consumption of goat milk and fermented fish or contamination of drinking water fecal contents.
Conclusion
For the first time, the study provided interesting data on the fecal microbial communities from Adi tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, where Escherichia coli was the most abundant microbiota observed, constituting the bulk of the fecal flora. Antibiotics resistance and biofilm formation observed in E. coli, E. hirae, E. faecalis, and E durans in the healthy Adi tribe of Arunachal Pradesh have raised the alarm as this may have direct implications in therapeutic options.
Data Availability
The datasets generated during/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Aarestrup, F. M., Agerso, Y., Gerner-Smidt, P., Madsen, M., & Jensen, L. B. (2000). Comparison of antimicrobial resistance phenotypes and resistance genes in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium from humans in the community, broilers, and pigs in Denmark. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 37(2), 127–137.
Andoh, L. A., Ahmed, S., Olsen, J. E., Obiri-Danso, K., Newman, M. J., Opintan, J. A., Barco, L., & Dalsgaard, A. (2017). Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella among humans in Ghana. Tropical Medicine and Health, 45(1), 3.
Antony, S., Ravichandran, K., & Kanungo, R. (2018). Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae colonizing the gut of adult rural population in South India. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, 36(4), 488–493.
Assefa, A., & Girma, M. (2019). Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella and Shigella isolates among children aged below five years with diarrhoea attending Robe General Hospital and Goba Referral Hospital, South East Ethiopia. Tropical Disease Travel Medicine and Vaccine, 5(1), 19.
Basavaraju, A., & Praveena, M. (2016). Detection of biofilm-producing bacteria on invasive medical devices and their antibiogram. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research, 7(7), 3053.
Bonten, M., Stobberingh, E., Philips, J., & Houben, A. (1992). Antibiotic resistance of Escherichia coli in fecal samples of healthy people in two different areas in an industrialized country. Infection, 20(5), 258–262.
Calva, J. J., Sifuentes-Osornio, J., & Céron, C. (1996). Antimicrobial resistance in fecal flora: Longitudinal community-based surveillance of children from urban Mexico. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 40(7), 1699–1702.
Chotelersak, K., Thamacharoensuk, T., Tanasupawat, S., Nantavisai, K., Taweechotipatr, M., & Puttikamonkul, S. (2016). Preliminary studies of lactic acid bacteria isolated from feces of Thai newborns. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand= Chotmaihet thangphaet, 99, S90–S98.
Croes, S., Deurenberg, R. H., Boumans, M. L. L., Beisser, P. S., Neef, C., & Stobberingh, E. E. (2009). Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation at the physiologic glucose concentration depends on the S. aureus lineage. BMC Microbiology, 9(1), 229.
Del Campo, R., Ruiz-Garbajosa, P., Sanchez-Moreno, M. P., Baquero, F., Torres, C., Cantón, R., & Coque, T. M. (2003). Antimicrobial resistance in recent fecal enterococci from healthy volunteers and food handlers in Spain: genes and phenotypes. Microbial Drug Resistance, 9(1), 47–60.
Devriese, L. A., & Butaye, P. (1998). Vancomycin susceptibility as an aid to the identification of lactobacilli. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 27(2), 121–121.
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution, 39(4), 783–791.
Gandra, S., Klein, E. Y., Pant, S., Malhotra Kumar, S., & Laxminarayan, R. (2016). Faropenem consumption is increasing in India. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 62(8), 1050–1052.
Guven, G. S., & Uzun, O. (2003). Principles of good use of antibiotics in hospitals. Journal of Hospital Infection, 53(2), 91–96.
Jannati, E., Amirmozaffari, N., Saadatmand, S., & Arzanlou, M. (2020). Faecal carriage of high-level aminoglycoside-resistant and ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus species in healthy Iranian children. Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 20(2020), 135–144.
Kaur, S., Sharma, P., Kalia, N., Singh, J., & Kaur, S. (2018). Anti-biofilm properties of the fecal probiotic lactobacilli against Vibrio spp. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, 8, 120.
Kılıç, G. B., & Karahan, A. G. (2010). Identification of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the fecal samples of healthy humans and patients with dyspepsia, and determination of their pH, bile, and antibiotic tolerance properties. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 18(4), 220–229.
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., & Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 33(7), 1870–1874.
Lagier, J. C., Dubourg, G., Million, M., Cadoret, F., Bilen, M., Fenollar, F., Levasseur, A., Rolain, J. M., Fournier, P. E., & Raoult, D. (2018). Culturing the human microbiota and culturomics. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 16(9), 540–550.
Lester, S. C., Pla, M. D. P., Wang, F., Schael, I. P., Jiang, H., & O’Brien, T. F. (1990). The carriage of Escherichia coli resistant to antimicrobial agents by healthy children in Boston, in Caracas, Venezuela, and in Qin Pu, China. New England Journal of Medicine, 323(5), 285–289.
Meshram, L., Patidar, R. K., Khare, M., Bagde, S., Sahare, K. N., & Singh, V. (2012). Comparative analysis between biofilm formation of commensal and pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates. Asiatic Journal of Biotechnology Resources, 3(3), 1441–1446.
Millar, B. C., Jiru, X. U., Moore, J. E., & Earle, J. A. (2000). A simple and sensitive method to extract bacterial, yeast and fungal DNA from blood culture material. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 42(2), 139–147.
Nair, A., Balasaravanan, T., Malik, S. S., Mohan, V., Kumar, M., Vergis, J., & Rawool, D. B. (2015). Isolation and identification of Salmonella from diarrheagenic infants and young animals, sewage waste and fresh vegetables. Veterinary World, 8(5), 669–673.
Pinto, M. G. V., Franz, C. M., Schillinger, U., & Holzapfel, W. H. (2006). Lactobacillus spp. with in vitro probiotic properties from human faeces and traditional fermented products. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 109(3), 205–214.
Poeta, P., Costa, D., Rodrigues, J., & Torres, C. (2006). Antimicrobial resistance and the mechanisms implicated in faecal enterococci from healthy humans, poultry, and pets in Portugal. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 27(2), 131–137.
Puniya, M., Sangu, K. P. S., Bharadwaj, A., Gupta, D., Kumar, S., Dhewa, T., & Pant, S. (2012). Probiotic and functional attributes of Lactobacillus spp isolated from human faeces. Journal of Resources Antimicrobiology, 1, 0342–0042.
Saffari, F., Dalfardi, M. S., Mansouri, S., & Ahmadrajabi, R. (2017). Survey for correlation between biofilm formation and virulence determinants in a collection of pathogenic and fecal Enterococcus faecalis isolates. Infection & Chemotherapy, 49(3), 176–183.
Sahoo, K. C., Tamhankar, A. J., Sahoo, S., Sahu, P. S., Klintz, S. R., & Lundborg, C. S. (2012). Geographical variation in antibiotic-resistant Escherichia coli isolates from stool, cow-dung and drinking water. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9(3), 746–759.
Saitou, N., & Nei, M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 4(4), 406–425.
Salas-Jara, M. J., Ilabaca, A., Vega, M., & García, A. (2016). Biofilm forming Lactobacillus: new challenges for the development of probiotics. Microorganisms, 4(3), 35.
Seidman, J. C., Kanungo, R., BOURGEOIS, A., & Coles, C. L. (2009). Risk factors for antibiotic-resistant E. coli in children in a rural area. Epidemiology and Infection, 137(6), 879–888.
Sereno, M. J., Ziech, R. E., Druziani, J. T., Pereira, J. G., & Bersot, L. S. (2017). Antimicrobial susceptibility and biofilm production by Salmonella sp. strains isolated from frozen poultry carcasses. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 19(1), 103–108.
Shakya, P., Barrett, P., Diwan, V., Marothi, Y., Shah, H., Chhari, N., et al. (2013). Antibiotic resistance among Escherichia coli isolates from stool samples of children aged 3 to 14 years from Ujjain, India. BMC Infectious Diseases, 13(1), 477.
Shanahan, P. M. A., Thomson, C. J., & Amyes, S. G. B. (1995). β-Lactam resistance in normal faecal flora from South Africa. Epidemiology and Infection, 115(2), 243–253.
Shettima, S. A., & Iregbu, K. C. (2019). Antimicrobial resistance pattern of enterococci isolated from stool samples in a tertiary hospital in Nigeria. Annals of Tropical Pathology, 10(2), 126.
Singh, A. K., Das, S., Singh, S., Gajamer, V. R., Pradhan, N., Lepcha, Y. D., & Tiwari, H. K. (2018). Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in commensal Escherichia coli among the children in rural hill communities of Northeast India. PLoS One, 13(6), e0199179.
Suardana, I. W. (2014). Analysis of nucleotide sequences of the 16S rRNA gene of novel Escherichia coli strains isolated from feces of human and Bali cattle. Journal of Nucleic Acids, 2014(7).
Tamura, K. (1992). Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions when there are strong transition-transversion and G+ C-content biases. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 9(4), 678–687.
Tannock, G. W., Munro, K., Harmsen, H. J. M., Welling, G. W., Smart, J., & Gopal, P. K. (2000). Analysis of the fecal microflora of human subjects consuming a probiotic product containing Lactobacillus rhamnosusDR20. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 66(6), 2578–2588.
Terfassa, A., & Jida, M. (2018). Prevalence and antibiotics susceptibility pattern of Salmonella and Shigella species among diarrheal patients attending Nekemte Referral Hospital, Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Microbiology, 2018, 9214689.
Terraf, M. L., JuarezTomas, M. S., Nader-Macias, M. E., & Silva, C. (2013). Screening of biofilm formation by beneficial vaginal lactobacilli and influence of culture media components. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 113(6), 1517–1529.
Vasanthi, R., Karthikeyan, D., & Jeya, M. (2014). Study of biofilm production and antimicrobial resistance pattern of the bacterial isolates from invasive devices. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 31, 274–281.
Woźniak-Biel, A., Bugla-Płoskońska, G., Burdzy, J., Korzekwa, K., Ploch, S., & Wieliczko, A. (2019). Antimicrobial resistance and biofilm formation in Enterococcus spp. isolated from humans and turkeys in Poland. Microbial Drug Resistance, 25(2), 277–286.
Yilema, A., Moges, F., Tadele, S., Endris, M., Kassu, A., Abebe, W., & Ayalew, G. (2017). Isolation of enterococci, their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns and associated factors among patients attending at the University of Gondar Teaching Hospital. BMC Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 276.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (RBMCH/NER/10/2019-20).
Code Availability
Not applicable.
Funding
This study was funded by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (RBMCH/NER/10/2019-20).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
IS, IC, and YC prepared the study design and analysis tools; PH performed experiments; and MU helped in sampling. IS and PH wrote the manuscript, and all the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The present study was approved by the Human Ethical Committee, Assam University, Silchar, Assam, India. All the experiments were performed following relevant guidelines and regulations.
Consent to Participate
The samples were collected with the participants’ consent, and the participants duly filled the consent forms.
Consent for Publication
The participants gave their consent for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hazarika, P., Chattopadhyay, I., Umpo, M. et al. Phylogeny, Biofilm Production, and Antimicrobial Properties of Fecal Microbial Communities of Adi Tribes of Arunachal Pradesh, India. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 193, 1675–1687 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03535-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-021-03535-7