Abstract
Projects importing technology to lesser developed nations may raise five important concerns: famine resulting from substitution of cash crops for subsistence crops, the use of products banned in the United States but permitted overseas, the use of products safe in the U.S. but unsafe under local conditions, ecological consequences of technological change, and cultural disruption caused by displacing traditional ways of life. Are engineers responsible for the foreseeable hunger, environmental degradation, cultural disruption, and illness that results from the project? Are engineers guilty of paternalism if they refuse to accept the project for that reason? Criteria are given to help engineers assess the extent of their responsibility when working in lesser developed nations.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Shaw, A. & Barry, V. (1989), Moral Issues in Business, 4th ed., Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Schlossberger, E. (1993), The Ethical Engineer, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.
Sartorius, R. (1983), Paternalism, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Kleinig, J. (1984), Paternalism, Rowman and Allanheld, Totowa, NJ.
Donagan, A. (1977). The Theory of Morality, University of Chicago, Chicago.
Feinberg, J. (1970), Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility, Princeton University, Princeton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlossberger, E. The responsibility of engineers, appropriate technology, and lesser developed nations. SCI ENG ETHICS 3, 317–326 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0038-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0038-y