Abstract
This paper considers an approach to teaching ethics in bioengineering based on the How People Learn (HPL) framework. Curricula based on this framework have been effective in mathematics and science instruction from the kindergarten to the college levels. This framework is well suited to teaching bioengineering ethics because it helps learners develop “adaptive expertise”. Adaptive expertise refers to the ability to use knowledge and experience in a domain to learn in unanticipated situations. It differs from routine expertise, which requires using knowledge appropriately to solve routine problems. Adaptive expertise is an important educational objective for bioengineers because the regulations and knowledge base in the discipline are likely to change significantly over the course of their careers. This study compares the performance of undergraduate bioengineering students who learned about ethics for stem cell research using the HPL method of instruction to the performance of students who learned following a standard lecture sequence. Both groups learned the factual material equally well, but the HPL group was more prepared to act adaptively when presented with a novel situation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (2000) eds.. How people learn: Mind, brain, experience, and school, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1986). Two courses of expertise, in: Stevenson, H., Azuma, J. & Hakuta, K. eds., Child development and education in Japan, W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, pp. 262–272
Hatano, G. & Oura, Y. (2003) Commentary: Reconceptualizing school learning using insight from expertise research, Educational Researcher 32: 26–29.
Advisory Committee to the National Science Foundation, Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Shaping the future, Volume II: Perspectives on undergraduate education in Science, Mathematics, Education, and Technology (1998) National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
Hatano, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1999) Commentary: Alternative perspectives on transfer and transfer studies, International Journal of Educational Research 31(7): 645–654.
Fisher, F. F., & Peterson, P. (2001) A tool to measure adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering students. Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Albuquerque, NM.
Harris, T. R., Bransford, J. D., & Brophy, S. P. (2002) Roles for the Learning Sciences and learning technologies in biomedical engineering education: A review of recent advances, Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 4: 29–48.
Pandy, M. G., Petrosino, A., Austin, B. A., & Barr, R. A. (2005). Assessing adaptive expertise in undergraduate biomechanics, Journal of Engineering Education Manuscript in press.
Davis, M. (2003) Teaching ethics across the engineering curriculum, onlineethics.org (http://www.onlineethics.org/).
Herkert, J. R. (2000) Engineering ethics education in the USA: Content, pedagogy and curriculum, European Journal of Engineering Education 25(4): 303–314.
Weiss, J. W. (2003) Business Ethics: A Stakeholder and Issues Management Approach, South-Western/Thomson Learning, Mason, OH.
Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999) Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives, Academy of Management Journal 42: 479–485.
Freeman, R.E. (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, Pitman, London, UK.
Mongoven, A. M. (2003) Duties to stakeholders amidst pressure from shareholders: Lessons from an advisory panel on transplant policy, Bioethics 17(4): 319–340.
Paliwoda, J. (2002) Seven ways to think about ethics, Behavioral Health Management 22(5): 44–45.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973) Perception in chess, Cognitive Psychology 1: 33–81.
Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. (1996) Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Application, Merrill Prentice-Hall, Columbus, OH.
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996) External cognition: How do graphical representations work?, International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 45: 185–213.
Barron, B. J., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., et al. (1998) Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning, Journal of the Learning Sciences 7: 271–312.
Anderson, J. R. (1982) Acquisition of a cognitive skill, Psychological Review 89: 369–406.
Bransford, J. D., Franks, J. J., Vye, N. J., & Sherwood, R. D. (1989) New approaches to instruction: Because wisdom can’t be told, in: Vosniadou, S. & Ortony A., eds. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 470–497.
Schwartz, D. L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998) A time for telling, Cognition and Instruction 16(4): 475–522.
Schwartz, D. L., & Martin, T. (2004) Inventing to Prepare for Future Learning: The hidden efficiency of encouraging original student production in statistics instruction, Cognition and Instruction 22(2): 129–184.
Schwartz, D. L., Brophy, S., Lin, X., & Bransford, J. D. (1999) Software for manging complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course, Educational Technology Research and Development 47(2): 39–59.
Williams, S. M. (1992) Putting case-based instruction into context: Examples from legal and medical education, Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(4): 367–427.
Vye, N. J., Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., Barron, B. B., & Zech, L. (1998) SMART environments that support monitoring, reflection, and revision, in: Hacker, D., Dunlosky, J. & Graesser, A. eds. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
VaNTH. (2005). http://www.vanth.org.
University of Texas at Austin Ethics Group (2005) Ethics Learning Modules. http://www.engr.utexas.edu/ethics/modules.cfm.
Brophy, S., Bliley, K., Gray, A., Mathieson, C., Mowry, E., & Collins, J. (2002) BME goes to the movies: Developing ethical perspectives in bioengineers, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (CD-ROM DEStech Publications) Session 2273: 10 pages.
Collins, J., & Mathieson, C. (2002) Case studies in economics and ethics in an early biomedical engineering class, Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (CD-ROM DEStech Publications) Session 2164: 12 pages.
Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Sears, D. (2005) Innovation and efficiency in learning and transfer, in: Mestre, J. ed. Transfer, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, Manuscript in press.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983) Schema induction and analogical transfer, Cognitive Psychology 1: 1–38.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990) Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition, Educational Researcher 19(6): 2–10.
Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1997) The Jasper Project: Lessons in Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment and Professional Development, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
Sadler, D. R. (1989) Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems, Instructional Science 18: 119–144.
Bell, J. (November 11, 2003) Stem cell lines have limited value: Panel advocates starting new lines, Baltimore Sun, Baltimore.
Hays, W. L. (1994) Statistics, 5th edition, Harcourt Brace College Publishers, New York, NY.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Martin, T., Rayne, K., Kemp, N.J. et al. Teaching for adaptive expertise in biomedical engineering ethics. SCI ENG ETHICS 11, 257–276 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0045-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-005-0045-9