Abstract
This paper forms an introduction to this issue, the contents of which arose directly or indirectly from a conference in May 2001 on Corruption of scientific integrity? — The commercialisation of academic science. The introduction, in recent decades, of business culture and values into universities and research institutions is incompatible with the openness which scientific and all academic pursuit traditionally require. It has given rise to a web of problems over intellectual property and conflict of interest which has even led to corporate sponsors’ suppressing unfavourable results of clinical trials, to the detriment of patients’ health. Although there are those who see the norms of science developing to recognise the importance of instrumental science aiming at specific goals and of knowledge judged by its value in a context of application, none justifies the covert manipulation of results by vested interest.
Public awareness of these problems is growing and creating a climate of opinion where they may be addressed. We suggest a way forward by the introduction of nationally and internationally-accepted guidelines for industrial collaboration which contain proper protections of the core purposes of universities and of the independence of their research. Some codes suggested for this purpose are discussed. We note that some universities are moving to adopt such codes of conduct, but argue the need for strong support from the government through its funding bodies.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ziman, J.M. (2003) Non-instrumental roles of science, Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 17–27.
Olivieri, N.F. (2003) Patients’ Health or Company Profits? The Commercialisation of Academic Research, Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 29–41.
Weatherall, D. (2003) Problems for Biomedical Research at the Academia-Industrial Interface, Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 43–48.
Monbiot, G. (2003) Guard Dogs of Perception: The Corporate Takeover of Science, Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 49–57.
Bok, D. (1990) Universities and the future of America, Duke University Press, Durham, N.C.
Spier, R.E. (1998) Ethics and the funding of research and development at universities, Science and Engineering Ethics 4(3): 375–384.
Sanders, C. (21 June 2002) Academic calls for withdrawal of health committee criticism, THES.
Anon. (8 Sept. 2001) Pharmaceutical industry and medical research, The Lancet 358, Number 9284.
University of Cambridge, Council Minute 167, 2 March 1998.
Tasker, M. and Packham, D. (1994) Changing cultures?-government interventions in higher education 1987–93, Brit J. Educational Studies 42: 150.
Graham, D. & Clarke, P. (1986) The New Enlightenment, Macmillan, London.
Hayek, F.A. (1954) (Ed.) Capitalism and the Historians, R&KP, London.
Berdahl, R.M. (2000) The Privatization of Public Universities, Paper presented at Erfurt University, Erfurt, Germany, May 23. http://cio.chance.berkeley.edu/chancellor/sp/privatization.htm (Accessed 6.11.02).
Anon (11 Jan 2000) Is the university-industry complex out of control? Nature 409.
Rutherford, J. (1 March 2002) HEPLC needs a state subsidy, THES.
Klemperer, V. (2000) The Language of the Third Reich: Lingua Tertii Imperii, Athlone Press.
Orwell, G. (1949) Nineteen Eighty-Four, Martin Secker & Warburg; See also Steiner, G. (1967) Language and Silence (Penguin 1969, p. 137, 312)
McMurtry, J. (1991) Education and the Market Model, Journal of Philosophy of Education 25,:209.
Friedman, M. (1962) Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press, p. 133.
Merton, R.K. (1968) Social theory and social structure, The Free Press, New York, p. 606.
Packham, D. (2003) G.A.T.S. and Universities: Implications for Research, Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 85–100.
Scott, P. (2003) The Ethical Implications of New Research Paradigm, Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 73–84.
Monbiot, G. (2000) Captive State, Pan.
Millstone, E., Brunner, E. and White, I. (1994) Plagiarism or protecting public health, Nature, 371, 647–8.
Healy, D. (2003) In the Grip of the Python: A Case Study in Conflict of Interests, Science and Engineering Ethics 9: 59–71.
Anon. (16 March 2002) Reputations at stake, New Scientist, p.16.
Rushe, D. and Durman, P. (28 July 2002) Crackdown on crony capitalism, Sunday Times, p. 3.5.
Sanders, C. (12 July 2002) Cambridge donor in fraud case, THES, p. 48.
Evans, G.R. (2002) Academics and Real World, Open University Press.
Packham, D. and Tasker, M. (1997) Industry and the Academy — a Faustian Contract? Industry & Higher Education 11(2): 85–90.
Thompson, J., Baird P. and Downie, J. (Oct. 2001) The Olivieri Report, The complete text of the independent inquiry commissioned by the Canadian Association of University Teachers, James Lorimer and Company, Toronto, p. 17–20.
Anon. (2001) Sponsorship, authorship, and accountability Lancet 385, 854.
The journals are: Annals of Internal Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, New England Journal of Medicine, Canadian Medical Association Journal, Ugeskrift for Laeger, The Lancet, MEDLINE/Index Medicus, New Zealand Medical Journal, Norwegian Medical Association, Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde, Medical Journal of Australia, Western Journal of Medicine.
Stevenson, R. (Nov. 2001) Comment, Chemistry in Britain, p. 3.
The Missenden Code of Practice for Ethics and Accountability, http://www.missendencentre.co.uk/docs/MissCode.pdf, 27.11.02.
Approval to hold Outside Appointments, Guidelines on the holding of outside appointments from 18 June 2001 Oxford University Gazette, 18 April 2002.
University of Bath, Standing Orders of Council, Sect. 29, Procedure for Inquiring into Allegations of Misconduct in Research and Scholarship; http://www.bath.ac.uk/orders/council/#MiscResSch (accessed 11.12.02).
CVCP, “Sponsored university research: recommendations and guidance on contract issues”, June 1992.
Active Risk Management in Higher Education project, http://armed.ilrt.bris.ac.uk; accessed 25.11.02
Arst, H. & Caddick, M. (27 July 2001) Who’s watching over science? THES, and www.liv.ac.uk.
Packham, D. (1999) Impact of Commercialisation and Privatisation on Capabilities for Scientific Advice in Oracles or Scapegoats? Scientists and scientific advice in government policy making, Report of the conference on 28th Oct. 1999, Westminster Conference Centre, I.P.M.S, p. 11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Evans, G.R., Packham, D.E. Ethical issues at the university-industry interface: A way forward?. SCI ENG ETHICS 9, 3–16 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0015-z
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-003-0015-z