Opinion statement
Upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding secondary to ulcer disease occurs commonly and results in significant patient morbidity and medical expense. After initial resuscitation, carefully performed endoscopy provides an accurate diagnosis of the source of the UGI hemorrhage and can reliably identify those high-risk subgroups that may benefit most from endoscopic hemostasis. Large-channel therapeutic endoscopes are recommended. Endoscopists should be very experienced in management of patients with UGI hemorrhage, including the use of various hemostatic devices. For patients with major stigmata of ulcer hemorrhage—active arterial bleeding, nonbleeding visible vessel, and adherent clot—combination therapy with epinephrine injection and either thermal coaptive coagulation (with multipolar or heater probe) or endoclips is recommended. High-dose intravenous proton-pump inhibitors are recommended as concomitant therapy with endoscopic hemostasis of major stigmata. Patients with minor stigmata or clean-based ulcers will not benefit from endoscopic therapy and should be triaged to less intensive care and be considered for early discharge. Effective endoscopic hemostasis of ulcer bleeding can significantly improve outcomes by reducing rebleeding, transfusion requirement, and need for surgery, as well as reduce cost of medical care.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References and Recommended Reading
Kovacs TO, Jensen DM: Recent advances in the endoscopic diagnosis and therapy of upper gastrointestinal, small intestinal and colonic bleeding. Med Clin N Am 2002, 86:1319–1356.
Jensen DM: Where next with endoscopic ulcer hemostasis. Am J Gastroenterol 2002, 97:2161–2165.
Jensen DM, Savides T, Sitzer M, et al.: Demographics, risk factors and outcomes of peptic ulcer hemorrhage in the United States: results of a large multicenter study [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2003, 124:A17.
Wong RC: Endoscopic Doppler US probe for acute peptic ulcer hemorrhage. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:804–812.
Lau JY, Sung JJ, Lee KK, et al.: Effect of intravenous omeprazole on recurrent bleeding after endoscopic treatment of bleeding peptic ulcers. N Engl J Med 2000, 343:310–316.
Jensen DM, Pace SC, Soffer E, et al.: Continuous infusion of pantoprazole versus ranitidine for prevention of ulcer rebleeding: a US multicenter randomized double-blind study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:1991–1999.
Bardou M, Toubouti Y, Benhaberou-Brun D, et al.: Meta-analysis: proton-pump inhibition in high-risk patients with acute peptic ulcer bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005, 21:677–686.
Leontiadis GI, Howden CW: To establish the efficacy of PPI therapy for ulcer bleeding in the United States, do we need more patients or more PPIs? Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:2000–2002.
Jensen DM: Treatment of patients at high risk for recurrent bleeding from a peptic ulcer. Ann Intern Med 2003, 139:294–295.
Calvet X, Vergara M, Brullet E, et al.: Addition of a second endoscopic treatment following epinephrine injection improves outcome in high-risk bleeding ulcers. Gastroenterology 2004, 126:441–450.
Jensen DM, Machicado GA: Endoscopic hemostasis of ulcer hemorrhage with injection, thermal, and combination methods. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 7:124–131.
Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, Bianco MA, Piscopo R: Mechanical modalities of endoscopic therapy. Clips, loops and beyond. Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 7:132–138.
Technology Assessment Committee; Chuttani R, Barkun A, Carpenter S, et al.: Endoscopic clip application devices. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:746–750.
Yeh RW, Kaltenbach T, Soetikano R: “Endoclips.’ Tech Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 8:2–11.
Saltzman JR, Strata LL, Di Sena V, et al.: Prospective trial of endoscopic clips versus combination therapy in upper GI bleeding. AM J Gastroenterol 2005, 97:1503–1508.
Peng YC, Chen SY, Tung CF, et al.: Factors associated with failure of initial endscopic hemoclip hemostasis for upper gastrointestinal bleeding. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006, 40:25–28.
Jensen DM, Machicado GA, Hirabayashi K: Randomized controlled study of 3 different types of hemoclips for hemostasis of bleeding canine acute gastric ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:173–179.
Lin HJ, Lo WC, Cheng YC, Perng CL: Endoscopic hemoclip versus triclip placement in patients with high-risk peptic ulcer bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 [Epub ahead of print].
Park CH, Joo YE, Kim HS, et al.: A prospective, randomized trial comparing mechanical methods of hemostasis plus epinephrine injection to epinephrine injection alone for bleeding peptic ulcer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004, 60:173–179.
Lo CC, Hsu PI, Lo GH, et al.: Comparison of hemostatic efficacy for epinephrine injection alone and injection combined with hemoclip therapy in treating high-risk bleeding ulcers. Gastrointest Endosc 2006, 63:767–773.
Jensen DM, Kovacs TO, Jutabha R, et al.: Randomized trial of medical or endoscopic therapy to prevent recurrent ulcer hemorrhage in patients with adherent clots. Gastroenterology 2002, 123:407–413.
Kahi CJ, Jensen DM, Sung JJ, et al.: Endoscopic therapy versus medical therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer with adherent clot: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2005, 129:855–862. [Published erratum appears in Gastroenterology 2006, 131:980–981.]
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kovacs, T.O.G., Jensen, D.M. Endoscopic treatment of ulcer bleeding. Curr Treat Options Gastro 10, 143–148 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-007-0066-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-007-0066-3