Abstract
Pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) and paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare, catecholamine-producing tumors that are usually sporadic. However, about 30% of these tumors have been identified as being of inherited origin. To date, nine genes have been confirmed as participating in PHEO or PGL tumorigenesis. Germline mutations were found in 100% of syndromic cases and in about 90% of patients with positive familial history. In nonsyndromic patients with apparently sporadic tumors, genetic mutations have been found in up to 27%, and genetic testing is now recommended for all patients with PHEOs and PGLs. Patients with syndromic lesions, a positive family history, or both should be tested for the appertaining gene. Recent discoveries have shown that the order of tested genes in nonsyndromic, nonfamilial cases can be based on histologic evaluation, location, and the biochemical phenotype of PHEOs and PGLs—the “rule of three.” Identification of a gene mutation may lead to early diagnosis and treatment, regular surveillance, and a better prognosis for patients and their relatives.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Although most pheochromocytomas (PHEOs) are sporadic, genetics in the development of these tumors is becoming more and more central. According to the latest discoveries, nine genes play an important role in the pathogenesis of PHEOs, including the REarranged during Transfection (RET) proto-oncogene, the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene (VHL), the neurofibromatosis type 1 tumor suppressor gene (NF1), genes encoding four succinate dehydrogenase complex subunits (SDHx—that is, SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD genes), the gene encoding the enzyme responsible for flavination of the SDHA subunit (SDHAF2 or SDH5 gene, for its yeast ortholog), and the newly described tumor suppressor TMEM127 gene [1–3, 4••, 5••, 6••, 7••]. Furthermore, although previously about 24% of sporadic PHEOs presented genetic mutations [8], now this number is about 30% or more [3, 9••, 10, 11••]. Finally, there are new data linking the specific genotype of these tumors to its specific location, typical biochemical phenotype, or future clinical behavior. For example, SDHB gene mutations are associated with extra-adrenal location, overproduction of norepinephrine and dopamine, and a high risk of malignancy [12••, 13••; Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations].
PHEOs are associated with the following familial syndromes: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN 2), von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL), von Recklinghausen’s neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), and familial PGLs. Hereditary forms of PHEOs and PGLs can differ in age at diagnosis, location, malignant potential, and catecholamine phenotype (Table 1).
Familial Syndromes Associated with PHEOs and PGLs
Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2
MEN 2 is an autosomal-dominant syndrome caused by activating germline mutations in the RET proto-oncogene located on chromosome 10q11.2, which encodes a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase involved in the regulation of cell proliferation and apoptosis [1, 2, 14]. This syndrome is usually divided into three subgroups:
-
MEN 2A is characterized by medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) in 95% of patients, PHEO in 50%, and hyperparathyroidism (caused by parathyroid hyperplasia/adenoma) in 15% to 30% of cases.
-
MEN 2B is characterized by MTC in 100% of cases, PHEO in 50%, marfanoid habitus, and multiple mucosal ganglioneuromas.
In most cases, MTC is the first presentation of MEN 2. Approximately 90% of MEN 2 cases are of the MEN 2A subtype [1, 2, 14–16]. More than 85% of patients with MEN 2A have mutations in codon 634, exon 11, and about 95% of MEN 2B cases are caused by a single missense mutation in codon 918, exon 16 of the RET proto-oncogene [1, 2, 15, 16].
In MEN 2, PHEOs are usually adrenal, benign, and are bilateral in more than 50% of patients [1, 2, 9••, 10, 17]. The frequency of malignant transformation is less than 5%, but children with MEN 2B–associated PHEOs have a higher risk of malignancy than those with MEN 2A or sporadic disease [15]. PHEOs are most commonly diagnosed between the ages of 30 and 40 years [2, 9••, 10, 15, 17]. MEN 2–related tumors overexpress phenylethanolamine N-methyltransferase (the enzyme that converts norepinephrine to epinephrine), so the biochemical phenotype is consistent with hypersecretion of epinephrine in large amounts, resulting in an early clinical phenotype characterized by attacks of palpitations, nervousness, anxiety, and headaches rather than the more common patterns of hypertension to be seen in other hereditary tumors [17, 18]. The increased plasma and urinary levels of metanephrine (the catecholamine O–methylated metabolite of epinephrine) in MEN 2 patients distinguish them from those with VHL and SDHx mutations (Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations).
von Hippel-Lindau Disease
VHL is an autosomal-dominant inherited syndrome with PHEOs (VHL type 2) or without PHEOs (VHL type 1) [1, 2, 19]. VHL type 1 is the most common form, with a predisposition to develop retinal angiomas, central nervous system hemangioblastomas, and clear-cell renal carcinomas. There also could be other tumors: islet tumors of the pancreas, endolymphatic sac tumors, or cysts and cystadenomas of the kidney, pancreas, epididymis, and broad ligament. VHL type 2 is characterized by a predisposition to develop PHEOs. Type 2A is without renal carcinoma, and other VHL type 1 tumors are infrequent; type 2B includes all VHL type 1 tumors; type 2C develops PHEO alone, as an apparently sporadic tumor [2, 3, 17, 19–21]. VHL is caused by heterozygous germline mutations in the VHL tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 3p25.5. The gene encodes a VHL protein, which is involved in blood vessel formation by regulating activity of hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1α). Loss of VHL protein function predisposes VHL carriers to both benign and malignant tumors in multiple organs [2, 3, 20, 22]. More than 300 mutations of the VHL gene have been identified [1, 21]. Approximately 20% of families with VHL carry de novo mutations, highlighting the need for mutation analysis in patients with apparently sporadic PHEOs [21].
VHL catecholamine-producing tumors are most commonly intra-adrenal PHEOs, although rare extra-adrenal sympathetic PGLs and parasympathetic head and neck PGLs have also been found [9••, 10, 23, 24••, 25•]. PHEOs associated with VHL are more likely to be bilateral (up to 50%) and more than half of the VHL patients with PHEOs have multiple tumors [2, 9••, 10, 23, 24••]. VHL-associated PHEOs appear to undergo malignant transformation less frequently than sporadic PHEOs (<5 % of patients) [2, 17, 22, 24••]. PHEOs develop in 10% to 20% of VHL patients, with a mean age of presentation of 30 years [3, 9••, 10, 15]. The biochemical profile of VHL patients differs from that of patients with MEN 2 or NF1. PHEOs in VHL mostly produce only norepinephrine because of a low expression of phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase [18]. As a result, VHL patients usually show solitary increases in plasma and urinary normetanephrine levels (Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations).
Neurofibromatosis Type 1
NF1 or von Recklinghausen’s disease is an autosomal-dominant genetic disorder caused by inactivating mutations of a tumor suppressor NF1 gene being localized on chromosome 17q11.2. This large gene encodes a neurofibromin, which is a GTPase-activating protein involved in the inhibition of Ras activity, which controls cellular growth and differentiation. Up to 50% of NF1 patients with indentified germline mutations carry a de novo mutation [1, 2, 20]. PHEOs occur in 0.1% to 5.7% of patients with NF1 and in 20% to 50% of NF1 patients with hypertension [26, 27]. The clinical diagnosis of NF1 requires two of the following seven criteria: six or more café-au-lait spots; two or more cutaneous neurofibromas or a plexiform neurofibroma; inguinal or axillary freckles; two or more benign iris hamartomas (Lisch nodules); at least one optic nerve glioma; dysplasia of the sphenoid bone, or pseudoarthrosis; and a first-degree relative with NF1, according to the preceding criteria [28]. In addition, a variety of tumors, including MTC, carcinoid tumors of the duodenal wall, parathyroid tumors, peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and leukemia (particularly chronic myeloid leukemia) have been described with higher frequency in NF1 patients than in the general population [2, 20].
In NF1, the mean age of PHEO diagnosis is in the fifth decade (mean, 42 years), the same as in the general population [9••, 10, 27, 29]. On occasion, NF1 can be diagnosed concurrently with PHEO, but usually the skin lesions typical of NF1 lead to the diagnosis of NF1 in childhood, whereas PHEOs are usually diagnosed in adulthood [26]. In most cases, PHEOs are benign and unilateral, followed occasionally by bilateral PHEOs and rarely by extra-adrenal sympathetic PGLs. Malignant PHEOs have been identified in up to 12% of patients, similar to the frequency of malignancy in the general population [2, 9••, 10, 27, 29]. NF1-related PHEOs produce both epinephrine and norepinephrine. The increased plasma and urinary levels of metanephrine (indicating epinephrine overproduction) help to discriminate NF1 patients from those with VHL and SDHx mutations [Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations].
Familial Paraganglioma Syndromes
Hereditary PGL syndromes are caused by mutations in the genes encoding the SDH complex subunits [3, 4••, 30–32]. Inactivation of SDH is associated with the accumulation of succinate and increased oxygen free radical production, resulting in the stabilization of HIF-1α [3, 33]. It has been suggested that loss of SDH function mimics chronic hypoxia leading to cellular proliferation. In contrast to normal differentiated cells, which rely primarily on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation to generate the energy needed for cellular processes, most malignant tumor cells instead rely on aerobic glycolysis, a phenomenon termed “the Warburg effect” [34]. The SDH enzyme complex consists of four subunits encoded by four SDHx genes: the SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD genes. Mutation of the SDHD gene is responsible for the PGL 1 syndrome, SDHC gene mutation is causative for the PGL 3 syndrome, and SDHB gene mutation causes the PGL 4 syndrome. Succinate dehydrogenase complex assembly factor 2 (SDHAF2) encoded by the SDHAF2 gene (or SDH5, for its yeast ortholog) plays the main role in flavination of SDHA, which is necessary for correct function of this subunit. Loss of SDHAF2 results in loss of SDHA subunit function and reduces the stability of the whole SDH enzyme complex. Mutation of the SDHAF2 gene has been discovered to be responsible for PGL 2 syndrome [5••, 6••].
PGL 1 is an autosomal-dominant syndrome characterized by familial parasympathetic head and neck PGLs, less frequently by sympathetic extra-adrenal PGLs, and rarely by unilateral or bilateral PHEOs [3, 9••, 10, 11••, 29]; it is caused by inactivating mutations in the SDHD gene located on chromosome 11q23 [2, 3, 32]. The mean age of diagnosis is about 35 years. Carriers of SDHD mutations should be observed especially for head and neck PGLs, which are often multifocal, sometimes recurrent, and rarely malignant [3, 9••, 10, 11••, 29]. Family history in patients with SDHD mutations could be inconclusive because of maternal genomic imprinting [3, 20, 35].
PGL 2 is a very rare autosomal-dominant syndrome defined by familial head and neck PGLs. No cases of PGL 2 syndrome presenting as PHEOs have been described. Hereditary transmission occurs exclusively in children of fathers carrying the gene, pointing to the importance of maternal imprinting [36]. The SDHAF2 gene has been identified as causative [5••, 6••]. This gene was mapped to chromosome 11q13.1 by genomic sequence analysis [5••].
PGL 3 is a rare autosomal-dominant syndrome linked to mutations in the SDHC gene, which is located on chromosome 1q21 [2, 3, 31]. It is characterized by benign, seldom multifocal head and neck PGLs [9••, 10, 36]. SDHC mutations were originally believed to be associated only with parasympathetic head and neck PGLs [2, 36], but extra-adrenal sympathetic PGLs and PHEOs have been reported [9••, 11••, 37•]. No genomic imprinting has been described in PGL 3 and PGL 4 [21, 36].
PGL 4 is an autosomal-dominant syndrome characterized by sympathetic extra-adrenal PGLs, followed by intra-adrenal PHEOs and parasympathetic head and neck PGLs [3, 9••, 10, 11••, 29]. The syndrome is caused by inactivating mutations of the tumor suppressor SDHB gene located on chromosome 1p35–p36 [2, 3, 30]. An increased risk for renal cell carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), and breast and papillary thyroid carcinoma may be expected in carriers of an SDHB mutation [38•, 39•, 40, 41]. The mean age at the moment of diagnosis of PGL 4 is approximately 30 years. Typically, SDHB-related PGLs originate in extra-adrenal locations (the organs of Zuckerkandl in the abdomen, the mediastinum, or the pelvis), and are often large, mostly solitary, and have a strong tendency for metastatic spread [9••, 10, 11••, 29, 41, 42]. Diagnosis is frequently delayed by an atypical clinical presentation. Symptoms are caused by tumor mass effect rather by catecholamine excess [12••, 41, 43]. SDHB gene mutations have been implicated as the most common cause in the pathogenesis of malignant PHEOs and PGLs in both children and adults [9••, 10, 11••, 12••, 13••, 33, 41, 42]. Recently, about 38% of SDHB-related PGLs have been observed to be malignant [11••]. Even if there is no previous history of a familial syndrome related to PHEOs or PGLs, all patients with metastatic tumors should be considered for SDHB gene mutation testing. No clear genotype-phenotype correlations were detected for SDHB mutations. Genotype-phenotype correlations failed to distinguish differences between different mutations in tumor size, location, malignant potency, aggressive behavior, hypersecretion of dopamine, or metastatic disease at presentation of SDHB-related PGLs. Identical SDHB mutations of family members may result in tumors that vary in location and severity [33, 42, 43, 44••].
The predominant biochemical phenotype of PHEOs and PGLs related to SDHB and SDHD consists of dopamine hypersecretion alone, or hypersecretion of both dopamine and norepinephrine (SDHB-related tumors) [12••]. Thus increased plasma levels of methoxytyramine (indicating dopamine hypersecretion) could distinguish patients with SDHB and SDHD mutations from those with VHL, RET , or NF1 mutations (Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations).
Recently, immunohistochemistry staining for SHDB of removed tumors has been observed as a cost-effective approach for distinguishing SDHx-related PHEOs or PGLs (negative staining due to an absence of SDHB) from other forms (positive staining for MEN 2, VHL, and NF1 due to the presence of SDHB) [45••, 46••]. Completely absent staining is more commonly found with SDHB mutation, whereas weak, diffuse staining often occurs with SDHD mutation [45••]. In a prospective series, SDHB immunohistochemistry was 100% sensitive and 84% specific in detecting the presence of SDHx mutations [46••].
New Genes Related to PHEOs and PGLs
In addition to the SDHAF2 gene, two other genes recently have been found to be causative for familial PHEOs or PGLs. The SDHA gene previously was thought to be associated only with a neurodegenerative disorder known as Leigh syndrome, not with PHEOs/PGLs [3, 20, 21], but a specific mutation of SDHA linked with catecholamine-secreting abdominal PGL has been described. This mutation was present in 4.5% of a large series of PHEOs/PGLs [4••]. Recently, the tumor suppressor gene TMEM127 has been identified as a new PHEO susceptibility gene. This gene, located on chromosome 2q11, encodes transmembrane protein 127 (TMEM 127), which dynamically associates with a subpopulation of vesicular organelles, Golgi complex, and lysosomes, suggesting a subcompartment-specific effect. Germline TMEM127 mutation was detected in about 3% of sporadic-appearing PHEOs [7••].
Genetic Testing Approaches in Clinical Practice
Genetic Testing in Patients With a Known or Suspected Familial Syndrome
There are two main reasons for genetic testing in patients with a known or suspected familial syndrome. First, the familial syndromes are associated with other malignant tumors, so an early diagnosis of the syndrome (confirmed by the genetic testing) may lead to regular surveillance and early treatment. Second, hereditary forms of PHEOs are often multiple, extra-adrenal, recurrent, and sometimes malignant, so a strict follow-up is recommended for better prognosis [17]. This approach could extend to other family members, with similar benefits. The personal history, family history, and clinical examination are starting points before the assessment of an appropriate germline mutation. In case of a positive family history or evidence for specific features of the familial syndromes shown on Table 1 and Table 2, targeted genetic testing should be performed (Fig. 1). Germline mutations have been found in 100% of syndromic patients [9••, 47••] and in 41% to 64% of nonsyndromic patients with positive familial history [9••, 48••]. Overall, there is about a 90% chance of finding a specific gene mutation in patients with a positive family history [9••]. Whenever a specific germline mutation has been identified, screening for associated disorders should be performed. Moreover, genetic testing should be offered to the patient’s first-degree relatives, to ascertain the presence or absence of this gene mutation. Predictive testing helps to identify asymptomatic individuals at risk of developing the familial syndrome, and early identification of such individuals allows targeted biochemical and radiologic screening, which reduces morbidity and mortality [3, 17, 49].
Genetic Testing in Patients with Nonfamilial, Apparently Sporadic PHEOs/PGLs
PHEOs and PGLs are usually sporadic tumors without known family history or other symptoms of the above-mentioned familial syndromes, but the familial nature of the disease may not be recognized because of genomic imprinting, incomplete penetrance, de novo mutation, or incomplete familial history [2, 36]. Previous studies have shown that a significant number (7.5% to 27.0%) of patients with apparently sporadic PHEOs or PGLs were carriers for germline mutations of genes associated with familial syndromes. The frequency of genetic mutations in nonfamilial PHEOs and PGLs without an obvious syndrome varied significantly (VHL, 3.5%–11.1%; RET, 0.4%–5.0%; SDHD, 0.8%–10.0%; SDHB, 1.5%–10.0%) and showed geographical differences [49]. Recently, two large studies have found about an 18% to 19% frequency of germline mutations in nonsyndromic patients with negative family history [47••, 48••], but in the case of multiple or recurrent PHEOs and PGLs, the frequency has been estimated to be about 39% [9••]. These findings led to the recommendation that all patients with apparently sporadic PHEOs or PGLs should be screened for hereditary causes. Routine testing of all genes is expensive and time-consuming, but the proper order of gene tests can reduce the expense. In general, the presence of a germline mutation is likely in patients with any of the following features: early onset (<45 years); bilateral, multifocal, or extra-adrenal tumors (especially head and neck PGLs); and recurrent or malignant disease [9••, 36, 47••, 48••, 49].
PHEOs associated with NF1 can be identified by a careful physical examination or positive family history, so genetic testing for the NF1 gene is not necessary in principle. Other genes (RET, VHL, SDHB, SDHD, SDHC, rarely SDHA, SDHAF2, and potentially TMEM127) remain to be involved in mutation analysis. Patients with a positive personal history, specific syndromic lesions (Table 2), or both should be tested for the corresponding genes. Decision-making for genetic testing of nonsyndromic patients with sporadic PHEOs or PGLs could be based on histologic evaluation, location, and catecholamine production of the tumor (Fig. 1).
Histologic Evaluation of PHEOs/PGLs
Malignant PHEOs and PGLs (especially extra-adrenal PGLs) have been associated mostly with SDHB germline mutations [10, 11••, 12••, 13••, 29, 33, 41, 43, 44••, 48••]. Less than 5% of malignant tumors have been described in carriers of SDHD or SDHC mutations [3, 10, 11••, 29, 33, 41, 43, 48••]. Malignant NF1-related PHEOs were identified with a frequency similar to that malignancy-like sporadic PHEOs in the general population [2, 9••, 10, 27, 29]. Like VHL-associated PHEOs, MEN 2–associated PHEOs appear to undergo malignant transformation less often than sporadic PHEOs; only children with MEN 2B–associated PHEOs have a higher risk of malignancy than those with MEN 2A [2, 15, 17, 22, 24••].
Immunohistochemistry staining for SDHB positivity could have high sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between SDHx-related PHEOs/PGLs and other familial syndromes (MEN 2, VHL, NF1) or true sporadic tumors [45••, 46••].
Tumor Location and Biochemical Phenotype
Identification of intra-adrenal PHEOs suggests mutation of either the RET or VHL gene, followed by NF1, SDHB, and rarely by SDHD or, very rarely, by SDHC genes [1, 2, 9••, 10, 11••, 17, 23, 25•, 27, 29, 37•]. If the biochemical profile shows elevated metanephrine values (indicating epinephrine overproduction), then RET should be tested first. (NF1 patients are usually diagnosed by clinical investigation.) Tumors due to mutations of VHL and SDHx are not characterized by increase of epinephrine or metanephrine hypersecretion. Additional measurement of plasma methoxytyramine (indicating dopamine production) could discriminate patients with SDHx mutations from those with VHL mutations (Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations).
When extra-adrenal PGLs are diagnosed, germline mutations are found most commonly in SDHx genes [3, 9••, 10, 11••, 29, 47••, 48••], particularly in cases of dopamine hypersecretion (detected by increased levels of methoxytyramine) (Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations). SDHx-related parasympathetic head and neck PGLs are associated mostly with SDHD (especially multiple tumors) and less frequently with SDHB or SDHC mutations [3, 4••, 9••, 10, 11••, 29, 47••, 48••]. If testing for SDHD, SDHB, and SDHC is negative, testing for an SDHAF2 gene mutation should be performed, especially in young patients [6••]. If the tumors do not overproduce dopamine and methoxytyramine, testing for VHL gene mutations should be performed first, because parasympathetic head and neck PGLs are extremely rare in patients with MEN 2 or NF1 [9••, 10, 25•, 29, 47••, 48••].
Extra-adrenal sympathetic PGLs (in abdominal, thoracic, or pelvic locations) are usually related to SDHB (especially solitary, large tumors), less frequently to SDHD, rarely to SDHC, and very rarely to SDHA mutations [9••, 10, 11••, 37•, 41, 47••, 48••]. SDHB-related tumors usually overproduce dopamine and norepinephrine (detected by increased plasma levels of methoxytyramine and normetanephrine, respectively). The increased levels of metanephrine (indicating epinephrine hypersecretion) are specific for MEN 2 (or NF1) patients and could distinguish them from those with VHL and SDHx mutations. VHL-related tumors produce only norepinephrine and normetanephrine (Eisenhofer G, Pacak K, et al., unpublished observations).
Conclusions
It has been proved that about 30% or more of PHEOs and PGLs are of inherited origin. So far, nine genes have been established as causing familial PHEOs or PGLs. These tumors may be a part of complex clinical syndromes or can be found alone as apparently sporadic neoplasms. Clinical, histologic, and biochemical evaluation (the “rule of three”) may help with decision-making about subsequent gene analysis. Genetic testing for the appropriate germline mutation leads to the correct diagnosis and thus to regular surveillance, early treatment, and better prognosis for patients with PHEOs or PGLs, and similar benefits could extend to other family members.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Koch CA, Vortmeyer AO, Huang SC, et al.: Genetic aspects of pheochromocytoma. Endocr Regul 2001, 35:43–52. Erratum in: Endocr Regul 2001, 35:94.
Bryant J, Farmer J, Kessler LJ, et al.: Pheochromocytoma: the expanding genetic differential diagnosis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003, 95:1196–1204.
Benn DE, Robinson BG: Genetic basis of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 20:435–450.
•• Burnichon N, Brière JJ, Libé R, et al.: SDHA is a tumor suppressor gene causing paraganglioma. Hum Mol Genet 2010, 19:3011–3020. These authors identified a heterozygous germline SDHA mutation, p.Arg589Trp, in a woman suffering from catecholamine-secreting abdominal PGL. They also investigated 202 PHEOs and PGLs for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD loci. LOH was detected at the SDHA locus in the patient’s tumor but was present in only 4.5% of a large series of PHEOs and PGLs.
•• Hao HX, Khalimonchuk O, Schraders M, et al.: SDH5, a gene required for flavination of succinate dehydrogenase, is mutated in paraganglioma. Science 2009, 325:1139–1142. These authors investigated a mitochondrial protein named SDH5, which interacts with the catalytic subunit of the SDH complex. SDH5 is required for SDH-dependent respiration and for SDHA flavination (incorporation of the flavin adenine dinucleotide cofactor). Germline loss-of-function mutations in the human SDH5 gene, located on chromosome 11q13.1, segregate with disease in a family with hereditary PGLs.
•• Bayley JP, Kunst HP, Cascon A, et al.: SDHAF2 mutations in familial and sporadic paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma. Lancet Oncol 2010, 11:366–372. These authors identified a pathogenic germline DNA mutation of SDHAF2, 232G-- > A (Gly78Arg) in a family with head and neck PGLs with a young age of onset.
•• Qin Y, Yao L, King EE, et al.: Germline mutations in TMEM127 confer susceptibility to pheochromocytoma. Nat Genet 2010, 42:229–233. These authors identified the transmembrane-encoding gene, TMEM127 on chromosome 2q11, as a new PHEO susceptibility gene. In a cohort of 103 samples, they detected truncating germline TMEM127 mutations in approximately 30% of familial tumors and about 3% of sporadic-appearing PHEOs.
Neumann HP, Bausch B, McWhinney SR, et al.: Germ-line mutations in nonsyndromic pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1459-1466.
•• Mannelli M, Castellano M, Schiavi F, et al.: Clinically guided genetic screening in a large cohort of Italian patients with pheochromocytomas and/or functional or nonfunctional paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94:1541–1547. These authors examined 501 consecutive patients with PHEOs or PGLs (secreting or nonsecreting). Germline mutations were detected in 32.1% of cases, but frequencies varied widely depending on the classification criteria, ranging from 100% in patients with associated syndromic lesions to 11.6% in patients with a single tumor and a negative family history.
Amar L, Bertherat J, Baudin E, et al.: Genetic testing in pheochromocytoma or functional paraganglioma. J Clin Oncol 2005, 23:8812–8818.
•• Burnichon N, Rohmer V, Amar L, et al.: The succinate dehydrogenase genetic testing in a large prospective series of patients with paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94:2817–2827. These authors examined 445 patients with head-and-neck and/or thoracic-abdominal or pelvic PGLs. A head-and-neck PGL was present in 97.7% of carriers of an SDHD mutation and 87.5% of SDHC mutation carriers, but in only 42.7% of SDHB carriers; on the other hand, a thoracic-abdominal or pelvic location was present in 63.5% of carriers of an SDHB mutation, 16.1% of SDHD mutation carriers, and 12.5% of those with an SDHC mutation. A malignant PGL was documented in 37.5% of the SDHB mutation carriers versus 3.1% with an SDHD mutation and none with an SDHC mutation.
•• Timmers HJ, Kozupa A, Eisenhofer G, et al.: Clinical presentations, biochemical phenotypes, and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit B-associated pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007, 92:779–786. This study included 29 patients with SDHB-related abdominal or thoracic PGLs. The mean age at diagnosis was 33.7 ± 15.7 years. Tumor-related pain was among the presenting symptoms in 54% of patients. Hypertension was present in 76%, and 90% lacked a family history of PGL. All primary tumors but one originated from extra-adrenal locations. The mean tumor size (± SD) was 7.8 ± 3.7 cm. Twenty-eight percent of patients presented with metastatic disease, and all but one eventually developed metastases after 2.7 ± 4.1 years. The biochemical phenotype was consistent with hypersecretion of both norepinephrine and dopamine in 46%, norepinephrine only in 41%, and dopamine only in 3%. No obvious genotype-phenotype correlations were identified.
•• Amar L, Baudin E, Burnichon N, et al.: Succinate dehydrogenase B gene mutations predict survival in patients with malignant pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007, 10:3822–3828. This study included 54 patients with malignant PHEOs/PGLs. Germline mutations were identified in SDHB genes (n = 23, including 21 patients with apparent sporadic tumors) and VHL genes (n = 1); two patients had NF1. Patients with SDHB mutations were younger, more frequently had extra-adrenal tumors, and had a shorter metanephrine excretion doubling time. The presence of SDHB mutations was significantly and independently associated with mortality.
Raue F, Frank-Raue K: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: 2007 update. Horm Res 2007, 68(Suppl 5):101–104.
Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ilias I: Diagnosis of pheochromocytoma with special emphasis on MEN2 syndrome. Hormones (Athens) 2009, 8:111–116.
Mulligan LM, Marsh DJ, Robinson BG, et al.: Genotype-phenotype correlation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: report of the International RET Mutation Consortium. J Intern Med 1995, 238:343–346.
Lenders JW, Eisenhofer G, Mannelli M, Pacak K: Phaeochromocytoma. Lancet 2005, 366:665–675.
Eisenhofer G, Walther MM, Huynh TT, et al.: Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001, 86:1999–2008.
Maher ER, Yates JR, Harries R, et al.: Clinical features and natural history of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Q J Med 1990, 77:1151–1163.
Elder EE, Elder G, Larsson C: Pheochromocytoma and functional paraganglioma syndrome: no longer the 10% tumor. J Surg Oncol 2005, 89:193–201.
Petri BJ, van Eijck CH, de Herder WW, et al.: Phaeochromocytomas and sympathetic paragangliomas. Br J Surg 2009, 96:1381–1392.
Maxwell PH, Wiesener MS, Chang GW, et al.: The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 1999, 399:271–275.
Hes FJ, Höppener JW, Lips CJ: Clinical review 155: Pheochromocytoma in Von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003, 88:969–974.
•• Srirangalingam U, Khoo B, Walker L, et al.: Contrasting clinical manifestations of SDHB and VHL associated chromaffin tumours. Endocr Relat Cancer 2009, 16:515–525. This study assessed 31 patients with chromaffin tumors; 16 had SDHB gene mutations and 15 had a diagnosis of VHL. VHL-related tumors were predominantly adrenal PHEOs (84.6%), whereas SDHB-related tumors were predominantly extra-adrenal PGLs (76%). Multifocal disease (bilateral PHEOs) was present in 60% of the VHL cohort but only 19% of the SDHB cohort, whereas metastatic disease was found in 31% of the SDHB cohort but was not found in the VHL cohort.
• Boedeker CC, Erlic Z, Richard S, et al.: Head and neck paragangliomas in von Hippel-Lindau disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94:1938–1944. From a total of 809 head and neck PGLs, 12 patients were found to have hereditary non-SDHx head-and-neck PGLs: 11 in the setting of germline VHL mutations and one with a RET mutation.
Walther MM, Herring J, Enquist E, et al.: von Recklinghausen’s disease and pheochromocytomas. J Urol 1999, 162:1582–1586.
Zöller ME, Rembeck B, Odén A, et al.: Malignant and benign tumors in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 in a defined Swedish population. Cancer 1997, 79:2125–2131.
Gutmann DH, Aylsworth A, Carey JC, et al.: The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA 1997, 278:51–57.
Bausch B, Borozdin W, Neumann HP; European-American Pheochromocytoma Study Group: Clinical and genetic characteristics of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 and pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 2006, 354:2729–2731.
Astuti D, Latif F, Dallol A, et al.: Gene mutations in the succinate dehydrogenase subunit SDHB cause susceptibility to familial pheochromocytoma and to familial paraganglioma. Am J Hum Genet 2001, 69:49–54. Erratum in Am J Hum Genet 2002, 70:565.
Niemann S, Müller U: Mutations in SDHC cause autosomal dominant paraganglioma, type 3. Nat Genet 2000, 26:268–270.
Baysal BE, Ferrell RE, Willett-Brozick JE, et al.: Mutations in SDHD, a mitochondrial complex II gene, in hereditary paraganglioma. Science 2000, 287:848–851.
Timmers HJ, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Mannelli M, Pacak K: Clinical aspects of SDHx-related pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Endocr Relat Cancer 2009, 16:391–400.
Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB: Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009, 324:1029–1033.
Hensen EF, Jordanova ES, van Minderhout IJ, et al.: Somatic loss of maternal chromosome 11 causes parent-of-origin-dependent inheritance in SDHD-linked paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma families. Oncogene 2004, 23:4076–4083.
Jiménez C, Cote G, Arnold A, Gagel RF: Review: Should patients with apparently sporadic pheochromocytomas or paragangliomas be screened for hereditary syndromes? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 91:2851–2858.
• Peczkowska M, Cascon A, Prejbisz A, et al.: Extra-adrenal and adrenal pheochromocytomas associated with a germline SDHC mutation. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2008, 4:111–115. The family presented had adrenal pheochromocytoma and carotid body tumor as parts of a familial PHEO-PGL syndrome associated with a germline mutation in the SDHC gene.
• Ricketts C, Woodward ER, Killick P, et al.: Germline SDHB mutations and familial renal cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2008, 100:1260–1262. These authors investigated whether germline mutations in SDH subunit genes (SDHB, SDHC, SDHD) were associated with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) susceptibility in 68 patients with no clinical evidence of an RCC susceptibility syndrome. No mutations in SDHC or SDHD were identified in probands, but 3 (4.4%) of the 68 probands had a germline SDHB mutation.
• Pasini B, McWhinney SR, Bei T, et al.: Clinical and molecular genetics of patients with the Carney-Stratakis syndrome and germline mutations of the genes coding for the succinate dehydrogenase subunits SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD. Eur J Hum Genet 2008, 16:79–88. These authors investigated 11 patients with the dyad of PGL and gastric stromal sarcoma; in 8, the GISTs were caused by germline mutations of SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD genes.
Lee J, Wang J, Torbenson M, et al.: Loss of SDHB and NF1 genes in a malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast as detected by oligo-array comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 2010, 196:179–183.
Neumann HP, Pawlu C, Peczkowska M, et al.: Distinct clinical features of paraganglioma syndromes associated with SDHB and SDHD gene mutations. JAMA 2004, 292:943–951. Erratum in: JAMA 2004, 292:1686.
Brouwers FM, Eisenhofer G, Tao JJ, et al.: High frequency of SDHB germline mutations in patients with malignant catecholamine-producing paragangliomas: implications for genetic testing. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 91:4505–4509.
Benn DE, Gimenez-Roqueplo AP, Reilly JR, et al.: Clinical presentation and penetrance of pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2006, 91:827–836.
•• Ricketts CJ, Forman JR, Rattenberry E, et al.: Tumor risks and genotype-phenotype-proteotype analysis in 358 patients with germline mutations in SDHB and SDHD. Hum Mutat 2010, 31:41–51. Authors assessed 358 patients with SDHB (n = 295) and SDHD (n = 63) mutations. At age 60 years, the risk of head and neck PGL in SDHB mutation carriers was 29% and the risk of PHEO was 52%; in SDHD mutation carriers, the risks were and 71% and 29%, respectively. Risks of malignant PHEO and renal tumors (14% at age 70 years) were higher in SDHB mutation carriers. No clear genotype-phenotype correlations were detected for SDHB mutations.
•• Gill AJ, Benn DE, Chou A, et al.: Immunohistochemistry for SDHB triages genetic testing of SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD in paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndromes. Hum Pathol 2010, 41:805–814. These authors defined positive, weak diffuse, and negative immunohistochemistry staining for SDHB. All 12 SDH mutated tumors (6 SDHB, 5 SDHD, and 1 SDHC) showed weak diffuse or negative staining, whereas 9 of 10 tumors with known mutations of VHL, RET, or NF1 showed positive staining. One VHL-associated tumor showed weak diffuse staining; one PGL with no known SDH mutation but clinical features suggesting familial disease was negative, and one showed weak diffuse staining. Completely absent staining is more commonly found with SDHB mutation, whereas weak diffuse staining often occurs with SDHD mutation.
•• van Nederveen FH, Gaal J, Favier J, et al.: An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 2009, 10:764–771. Immunohistochemistry for SDHB was done on 220 tumors. SDHB protein expression was absent in all 102 PHEOs and PGLs with an SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD mutation, but was present in all 65 tumors related to MEN 2, VHL, and NF1. Of the 53 PHEOs or PGLs with no syndromic germline mutation, 47 (89%) showed SDHB expression. The SDHB immunohistochemistry was 100% sensitive (95% CI, 87%–100%) in detecting the presence of an SDH mutation in the prospective series, and 84% specific (95% CI, 60%–97%).
•• Cascón A, Pita G, Burnichon N, et al.: Genetics of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in Spanish patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009, 94:1701–1705. This study analyzed 237 nonrelated probands for the major susceptibility genes: VHL, RET, SDHB, SDHC, and SDHD. All syndromic probands were genetically diagnosed with a mutation affecting either RET or VHL. A total of 79.1% of patients presenting with nonsyndromic familial antecedents and 18.4% of those with apparently sporadic presentation were found to carry a mutation in one of the susceptibility genes.
•• Erlic Z, Rybicki L, Peczkowska M, et al.: Clinical predictors and algorithm for the genetic diagnosis of pheochromocytoma patients. Clin Cancer Res 2009, 15:6378–6385. Of 989 apparently nonsyndromic PHEOs, 187 (19%) harbored germline mutations. Predictors for the presence of mutation were estimated: age less than 45 years, multiple PHEOs, extra-adrenal location, and previous head-and-neck PGL.
Pacak K, Eisenhofer G, Ahlman H, et al.; International Symposium on Pheochromocytoma: Pheochromocytoma: recommendations for clinical practice from the First International Symposium. October 2005. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2007, 3:92–102.
Acknowledgment
The authors would like to thank Mr. Tobias Engel for his technical help with the figure.
Disclosure
No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karasek, D., Frysak, Z. & Pacak, K. Genetic Testing for Pheochromocytoma. Curr Hypertens Rep 12, 456–464 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-010-0151-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-010-0151-1