Abstract
Esophageal testing aims to quantify gastroesophageal reflux or characterize esophageal motility. Reflux monitoring traditionally has been based on the detection of acidic reflux by a transnasal catheter that measures esophageal pH. Recently there have been two major developments in this field: the wireless Bravo pH capsule (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN), which allows catheter-free monitoring, and impedance-pH measurement, a catheter-based technique that enables detection of acidic and nonacidic reflux. The assessment of esophageal motility has relied on conventional manometry for many years. Two new proedures also recently became available to assess esophageal motility: high-resolution manometry, which uses many closely spaced pressure sensors and provides spatiotemporal plots of esophageal pressure changes, and impedance manometry, a test that directly measures bolus transit and provides conventional manometric data. The advantages, disadvantages, and clinical importance of these new esophageal tests are discussed in this review.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References and Recommended Reading
Jamieson JR, Stein HJ, DeMeester TR, et al.: Ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring: normal values, optimal thresholds, specificity, sensitivity, and reproducibility. Am J Gastroenterol 1992, 87:1102–1111.
Richter JE, Bradley LA, DeMeester TR, Wu WC: Normal 24-hr ambulatory esophageal pH values. Influence of study center, pH electrode, age, and gender. Dig Dis Sci 1992, 37:849–856.
Schlesinger PK, Donahue PE, Schmid B, et al.: Limitations of 24-hour intraesophageal pH monitoring in the hospital setting. Gastroenterology 1985, 894:797–804.
Fass R, Hell R, Sampliner RE, et al.: Effect of ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring on reflux-provoking activities. Dig Dis Sci 1999, 44:2263–2269.
Mearin F, Balboa A, Dot J, et al.: How standard is a standard day during a standard ambulatory 24-h esophageal pH monitoring? Scand J Gastroenterol 1998, 33:583–585.
Aksglaede K, Funch-Jensen P, Thommessen P: Intra-esophageal pH probe movement during eating and talking. A videoradiographic study. Acta Radiol 2003, 44:131–135.
Pouderoux P, Lin S, Kahrilas PJ: Timing, propagation, coordination, and effect of esophageal shortening during peristalsis. Gastroenterology 1997, 112:1147–1154.
Anngiansah A, Sumboonnanonda K, Wang J, et al.: Significantly reduced acid detection at 10 centimeters compared to 5 centimeters above the lower esophageal sphincter in patients with acid reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 1993, 88:842–846.
Agrawal A, Tutuian R, Hila A, et al.: Ingestion of acidic foods mimics gastroesophageal reflux during pH monitoring. Dig Dis Sci 2005, 50:1916–1920.
Hila A, Agrawal A, Castell DO: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH esophageal testing compared to pH alone for diagnosis both acid and weakly acidic gastroesophageal reflux. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007, 5:172–177.
Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, Schreiner MA, et al.: Acid reflux event detection using the Bravo wireless vs the Slimline catheter pH systems: why are the numbers so different? Gut 2005, 54:1687–1692.
Pandolfino JE, Ghosh S, Zhang Q, et al.: Slimline vs glass pH electrodes: what degree of accuracy should we expect? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006, 15:331–340.
Wenner J, Jonsson F, Johansson J, Oberg S: Wireless esophageal pH monitoring is better tolerated than the catheter-based technique: results from a randomized cross-over trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2007, 102:239–245.
Croffie JM, Fitzgerald JF, Molleston JP, et al.: Accuracy and tolerability of the Bravo catheter-free pH capsule in patients between the ages of 4 and 18 years. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007, 45:559–563.
Ward EM, Devault KR, Bouras EP, et al.: Successful oesophageal pH monitoring with a catheter-free system. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2004, 19:449–454.
Hirano I, Zhang Q, Pandolfino JE, et al.: Four-day Bravo pH capsule monitoring with and without proton pump inhibitor therapy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005, 3:1083–1088.
Pandolfino JE, Bianchi LK, Lee TJ, et al.: Esophagogastric junction morphology predicts susceptibility to exercise-induced reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1430–1436.
Hirano I: Review article: modern technology in the diagnosis of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease—Bilitec, intraluminal impedance and Bravo capsule pH monitoring. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2006, 23(Suppl 1):12–24.
Pandolfino JE, Richter JE, Ours T, et al.: Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system. Am J Gastroenterol 2003, 98:740–749.
Suzuki T, Yamaguchi T, Odaka T, et al.: Four-day continuous gastric pH monitoring following anti-acid secretory drug administration: cross-over test to assess the early effects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008, 27:66–71.
Iqbal A, Lee YK, Vitamvas M, Oleynikov D: 48-hour pH monitoring increases the risk of false positive studies when the capsule is prematurely passed. J Gastrointest Surg 2007, 11:638–641.
Lee YC, Wang HP, Chiu HM, et al.: Patients with functional heartburn are more likely to report retrosternal discomfort during wireless pH monitoring. Gastrointest Endosc 2005, 62:834–841.
des Varannes SB, Mion F, Ducrotte P, et al.: Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo). Gut 2005, 54:1682–1686.
Silny J: Intraluminal multiple electric impedance procedure for measurement of gastrointestinal motility. J Gastrointest Motil 1991, 3:151–162.
Sifrim D, Castell D, Dent J, et al.: Gastro-oesophageal reflux monitoring: reflux and consensus report on detection and definitions of acid, non-acid, and gas reflux. Gut 2004, 53:1024–1031.
Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Timmer R, Smout AJ: Reproducibility of mutichannel intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring of gastroesophageal reflux. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:265–269.
Shay S, Tutuian R, Sifrim D, et al.: Twenty-four hour ambulatory simultaneous impedance and pH monitoring: a multicenter report of normal values from 60 healthy volunteers. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1037–1043.
Zerbib F, des Varannes SB, Roman S, et al.: Normal values and day-to-day variability of 24-h ambulatory oesophageal impedance-pH monitoring in a Belgian-French cohort of healthy subjects. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005, 22:1011–1021.
Zentilin P, Liritano E, Dulbecco P, et al.: Normal volumes of 24-h ambulatory intraluminal impedance combined with pH-metry in subjects eating a Mediterranean diet. Dig Liver Dis 2006, 38:226–232.
Vela MF, Camacho-Lobato L, Srinivasan R, et al.: Intraesophageal impedance and pH measurement of acid and non-acid reflux: effect of omeprazole. Gastroenterology 2001, 96:647–655.
Mainie I, Tutuian R, Shay S, et al.: Acid and non-acid reflux in patients with persistent symptoms despite acid suppressive therapy: a multicenter study using combined ambulatory impedance-pH monitoring. Gut 2006, 55:1398–1402.
Zerbib F, Roman S, Ropert A, et al.: Esophageal pH-impedance monitoring and symptom analysis in GERD: a study in patients off and on therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:1956–1963.
Vela MF, Tutuian R, Katz PO, et al.: Baclofen decreases acid and non-acid post-prandial gastro-oesophageal reflux measured by combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003, 17:243–251.
Mainie I, Tutuian R, Agrawal A, et al.: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring to select patients with persistent gastro-oesophageal reflux for laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication. Br J Surg 2006, 93:1483–1487.
Tutuian R, Mainie I, Agrawal A, et al.: Nonacid reflux in patients with chronic cough on acid-suppressive therapy. Chest 2006, 130:386–391.
Bredenoord AJ, Weusten BL, Sifrim D, et al.: Aerophagia, gastric, and supragastric belching: a study using intraluminal electrical impedance monitoring. Gut 2004, 53:1561–1565.
Richter JE, Wu WC, Johns DN, et al.: Esophageal manometry in 95 healthy adult volunteers: variability of pressure with age and frequency of ‘abnormal’ contractions. Dig Dis Sci 1987, 32:583–592.
Frieling T, Hermann S, Kuhlbusch R, et al.: Comparison between intraluminal multiple electric impedance measurement and manometry in the human oesophagus. Neurogastroenterol Motil 1996, 8:45–50.
Reidel WL, Clouse RE: Variation in clinical presentation of patients with esophageal contraction abnormalities. Dig Dis Sci 1985, 30:1065–1071.
Achem SR, Crittenden J, Kolts B, et al.: Long-term clinical and manometric follow-up of patients with nonspecific esophageal motor disorders. Am J Gastroenterol 1992, 87:825–830.
Iman H, Shay S, Ali A, et al.: Bolus transit patterns in healthy subjects: a study using simultaneous impedance monitoring, videoesophagram, and esophageal manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2005, 288:1000–1006.
Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS: Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003, 1:174–182.
Tutuian R, Castell DO: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients. Am J Gastroenterol 2004, 99:1011–1019.
Conchillo JM, Nguyen NQ, Samson M, et al.: Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring in the evaluation of patients with non-obstructive dysphagia. Am J Gastroenterol 2005, 100:2624–2632.
Tutuian R, Mainie I, Agrawal A, et al.: Symptom and function heterogenicity among patients with distal esophageal spasm: studies using combined impedance-manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2006, 101:464–469.
Agrawal A, Hila A, Tutuian R, et al.: Bethanechol improves smooth muscle function in patients with severe ineffective esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol 2007, 41:366–370.
Tutuian R, Castell DO: Rumination documented by using multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2004, 2:340–343.
Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al.: Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006, 290:G988–G997.
Dent J: Approaches to driving the evolving understanding of lower oesophageal sphincter mechanical function. J Smooth Muscle Res 2007, 43:1–14.
Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ: American Gastroenterological Association medical position statement: clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology 2005, 128:207–208.
Fox MR, Bredenoord AJ: Oesophageal high-resolution manometry—moving from research into clinical practice. Gut 2008, 57:405–423.
Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al.: Deglutitive upper esophageal sphincter relaxation: a study of 75 volunteer subjects using solid-state high-resolution manometry. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006, 291:G525–G531.
Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Zhang Q, et al.: Quantifying EGJ morphology and relaxation with high-resolution manometry: a study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2006, 290:G1033–G1040.
Fox MR, Hebbard G, Janiak P, et al.: High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2004, 16:533–542.
Clouse RE, Staiano A, Alrakawi A, et al.: Application of topographical methods to clinical manometry. Am J Gastroenterol 2000, 95:2677–2679.
Pandolfino JE, Ghosh SK, Rice J, et al.: Classifying esophageal motility by pressure topography characteristics: a study of 400 patients and 75 controls. Am J Gastroenterol 2008, 103:27–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wilson, J.A., Vela, M.F. New esophageal function testing (impedance, Bravo pH monitoring, and high-resolution manometry): Clinical relevance. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 10, 222–230 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-008-0047-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-008-0047-2