Introduction

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive, autoimmune, neurodegenerative disorder that occupies the central nervous system (CNS); its pathogenesis includes axon loss and demyelination [1]. MS causes brain atrophy and widespread lesions or plaques in the brain and spinal cord [2]. These involvements in the CNS may result in disability in various areas, including motor, sensory, visual, balance-coordination, and cognitive impairment (CI) [3]. Different studies have reported the prevalence of cognitive decline in MS as 43–73% [4]. Cognitive areas affected are information processing speed, complex attention, visual learning, episodic memory, delayed recall, and executive functions [5, 6]. CI is a frequent symptom is explained by the existence of a significant number of separate lesions, diffuse axonal injury [7], and white and gray matter damages [8].

The diagnostic ratio of lifelong major depression in people with MS (pwMS) is approximately 50% [9]. Moreover, the prevalence of fatigue, which is considered closely related to depression, is 50–90% [10]. The composite effect of CI, depression, and fatigue affects the decision-making processes of pwMS, limiting their mental flexibility capacities; therefore, they can take a toll on daily activities, quality of life, and mental health [11]. Apart from the objective neurological status, evaluation of cognitive function, fatigue, and depression in pwMS is essential in terms of adherence to treatment, benefit from treatment, and planning of individual rehabilitation programs in order to improve the disability of pwMS. This study aimed to evaluate the cognitive functions of pwMS and investigate the relationship between depression, fatigue, disability, and cognitive functions.

Materials and methods

Participants

We interviewed 203 pwMS, who were followed by the MS Clinic of the Dokuz Eylul University (DEU) Hospital. Patients who applied to our clinic were invited to this study according to the order of application. It was informed that their participation in the study would not provide interest for them, but cognitive involvement would be determined. We could not complete tests in three pwMS because they had to back to work. The criteria for patient inclusion were (a) aged 18–55 years, (b) diagnosed with MS according to the “McDonald 2010 criteria”, and (c) signed the informed consent form. The exclusion criteria were (a) absence or non-completion of the data form, (b) having additional neurological and/or psychological disorders that could influence the clinical evaluation and cognitive tests, (c) antipsychotic drug use, severe head trauma history, (d) having a learning disability or mental retardation, (e) being a pregnant or lactating woman, (f) prior or current history of substance or alcohol dependence, (g) MS relapse and/or taking corticosteroid treatment within four weeks of the assessment.

Cognitive assessment

Brief International Cognitive Assessment for MS (BICAMS) is a test battery with robust psychometric features [12]; it consists of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) [13], initial learning trials of the California Verbal Learning Test–second edition (CVLT-II) [14], and Brief Visuospatial Memory Test–Revised (BVMT-R) [15]. A Turkish validity study for BICAMS was conducted by Ozakbas et al. [16] in Turkey. As no validated threshold of CI for BICAMS was available, CI for a single test was defined as 1.5 standard deviations (SD) below the control group mean in the validity study [17].

The SDMT primarily measures visuospatial scanning, constant attention and concentration, information processing speed, and narrowly, working memory [13]. In this study, the Rao (oral version) adaptation of the SDMT was individually used. On top of the test page, there is a key in divided blocks that matches nine numbers and symbols. The participant is asked to pair the pseudo-randomized digits with each symbol as quickly as possible over 90 s. The oral version of the task was selected, and the number of correct answers was recorded (highest score, 110).

The CVLT-II is the standard scale for auditory/verbal learning and memory in clinical neuropsychology [18]. It consists of 16 words divided into four categories (four tools, fruits, and animals, and furniture). In this study, the application covered the first five trials of the test, which assesses verbal memory. The total learning score indicates the total number of words recalled (highest score, 80).

The BVMT-R includes three recall trials for visuospatial learning and memory [15]. Participants are shown a stimulus card for 10 s on which six geometric shapes are printed in a 2 × 3 pattern. They are asked to draw as many symbols as they can remember. These symbols are scored from 0 to 2 based on accuracy and location. The total score consists of the sum of scores across the three trials (highest score, 36).

Other measurements

The Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) consists of nine statements on a 7-point scale. The patient is asked to mark the level of fatigue in the last week, including the day the test was applied. The result is calculated by dividing the total score by the number of items [19]. The cutoff value of fatigue was defined as four and above in this study [20].

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is administered to evaluate the degree of self-reported depression, with 21 items rated on a scale of 0–3. If the total score is 17 or above, it indicates depression [21] (highest score, 63).

Functional systems are evaluated based on the clinician’s interview and neurological examination, then the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score is obtained. In this scale, consisting of 20 steps with 0.5 intervals, 0 indicates a normal neurological exam, while 10 refers to death due to MS [22].

Procedures

These procedures were approved by the Non-Invasive Research Ethics Committee of DEU. All pwMS provided written informed consent to participate in the study (code: 2016/12-21). First, they completed the demographics questionnaire, and then the medical history was obtained; this was followed by administered of the FSS and BDI. BICAMS neuropsychological battery was administered by a board-certified psychologist (SDMT, CVLT-II, BVMT-R respectively), and a neurologist evaluated the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was conducted using the SPSS Statistics Version 20.0 software package. Descriptive statistics were shown as means and SD for numerical variables and numbers with percentages for categorical variables. Two group comparisons were obtained by t tests in the individual groups. A composite effect of depression and fatigue was expressed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The Pearson correlation coefficient r was used to determine the relationship between the numerical variables. CI for a single test was defined as 1.5 SD below the control group mean in the Turkish validity study [16], we carried out a risk analysis of our study group (mean age 36.5 vs 37.5, mean education level 11.9 vs 13.9). To examine independent predictors of CI, binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate associations among all three BICAMS raw scores (SDMT, BVMT-R, and CVLT-II total learning), age, gender, education level, disease duration, fatigue, depression, and disability level (A predictor assessed was not examined while controlling for another predictor). As p value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics

One hundred and forty females (70%) and 60 males (30%) diagnosed with MS were included in the study. Of the 200 pwMS, 191 had relapsing remitting-MS (RRMS) (95%), 6 secondary progressive-MS (SPMS) (6%), and 3 primary progressive-MS (PPMS) (2%). The sample included pwMS receiving immunomodulation therapy (oral: 38%; injectable: 56%) and who had stopped treatment for a while (6%; due to pregnancy plan, stable PPMS). The mean age of pwMS was 36.53 ± 9.73 years, and the mean length of education was 11.98 ± 3.55 years. The sociodemographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Sociodemographic characteristics of pwMS

The average depression score of the group was 9.93 ± 9.06, fatigue score was 3.15 ± 1.84, and EDSS score was 1.78 ± 1.58; the average disease duration was 6.17 ± 4.85 years. 124 pwMS did not suffer from depression or fatigue (62.0%), while 22 pwMS have both depression and fatigue (11%). The clinical characteristics are shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Clinical characteristics of pwMS

Cognitive outcome and correlation analyses

The mean scale scores for pwMS were as follows: SDMT, 47.99 ± 12.15; CVLT-II, 52.87 ± 11.13; and BVMT-R, 25.10 ± 6.53. CI was identified in 66 pwMS (33%) in one or more BICAMS sub-tests. The raw BICAMS values of pwMS with and without CI are shown in Table 3.

Table 3 Results of the BICAMS raw value in pwMS with and without CI

A moderate association was found between BICAMS and both the age and years of education (Table 4). Age, education years, disease duration, EDSS, BDI, occupation/employment status (females employed 31.4%, males 41.7%), and monthly income did not differ significantly between female and male pwMS. However, it was observed that the CVLT-II scores of females were significantly higher than those of males (r = 2.95, P < 0.05) (Table 5). The FSS scores of females were significantly higher than those of males (M = 3.33 versus 2.73, P = 0.031). A weak negative correlation between the FSS and both SDMT and BVMT-R (respectively, r = − 0.24, P = 0.001, r = − 0.14, P = 0.04), but not between the BDI and BICAMS, was found. The relationship among sociodemographic, clinical features, and BICAMS scores were shown in Table 4.

Table 4 The relationship among sociodemographic, clinical features and BICAMS scores in pwMS
Table 5 Cognitive functions of pwMS according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics

Between-group analyses

The disease duration was categorized as ≤ 5 years or > 5 years [23], and disability was categorized as EDSS < 4 or ≥ 4 [24, 25]. Furthermore, it was found that the BICAMS scores of the group with EDSS < 4 were significantly higher than those of pwMS with EDSS ≥ 4 (SDMT r = 5.60, CVLT-II r = 5.36, BVMT-R r = 4.42, P < 0.001). SDMT scores of pwMS without fatigue (FSS < 4) were significantly higher than those of pwMS with fatigue (FSS ≥ 4) (r = 2.99, P = 0.003). The cognitive functions of the pwMS according to their sociodemographic and clinical characteristics are shown in Table 5.

Disability and fatigue levels for pwMS with a disease duration of ≥ 5 years (long-term group) were significantly higher than those in the group with < 5 years since diagnosis (short-term group) (χ2 = 11.853, P < 0.001 for EDSS, χ2 = 1,021, P = 0.034 for FSS). Depression scores were found to be higher for the short-term than the long-term group (χ2 = 0.821, P > 0.05). Education years, occupation/employment status, and monthly income did not differ significantly between the short- and long-term groups. When the composite effect of depression and fatigue was examined, a significant difference was found between the groups in terms of SDMT scores (F = 3.771, P = 0.025).

Binary regression analyses

Gender was not significantly predictive in the binary regression analysis, so it was dropped from further analysis. The disease duration, FSS, and BDI scores were not significantly predictive either. When the education level was increased by 1 year, the SDMT scores increased by 0.8 points (P < 0.001 Exp(B): 0.827, 95% C.I. 0.744–0.919) and the CVLT-II scores by 0.9 points (P < 0.001 Exp(B): 0.869, 95% C.I. 0.777–0.972). When age was increased by 1 year, the SDMT scores decreased by 1.1 points (P = 0.009 Exp(B): 1.062, 95% C.I.1.015–1.111) (Table 6). When the EDSS increased by 1 point, the SDMT scores decreased by 1.4 points (P = 0.019 Exp(B): 1.366, 95% C.I. 1.053–1.772), and CVLT-II scores by 1.5 points (P < 0.001 Exp(B): 1.507, 95% C.I. 1.173–1.937) (Table 6).

Table 6 Factors affecting the developing cognitive impairment

Discussion

The present study examined that the relationship between cognitive functions and demographic-clinical features with 200 pwMS. Our findings revealed that pwMS with higher fatigue level have lower information-processing speeds, and all BICAMS scores of those with higher disability were significantly lower; nevertheless, there were no significant differences between the groups with/without depression in cognitive performance. Importantly, considering the cognitive effects of depression and fatigue symptoms coupling, the only significant difference was seen related to the information-processing speed.

Several studies have noted that age and education level are related to BICAMS performance, and substantive predictors of employment status at an early stage of disease [26, 27]. In the current study, the correlation results among age, education, and BICAMS supported the idea of taking into consideration the demographic characteristics, as well as clinical variables. Interestingly, verbal memory scores of women were higher than those of men in our study, although there were no sex differences found in any demographic or clinical characteristics, except fatigue level. Previous studies have suggested that females establish strategies for organization and spatial memory tasks via verbal memory [28, 29], and women performed significantly better than men on the verbal memory test [30].

We have determined the CI group according to the average BICAMS data of our previous study [16]. In line with the literature, age was negatively related to SDMT, and education was positively related to SDMT and CVLT-II in our study [31, 32]. With cognitive impairment defined as at least one or more abnormal tests [33, 34], it was 33% of pwMS with CI in one or more BICAMS subtests. The lower frequency of CI in our study group may be explained by the lower disability level and shorter disease duration.

Fatigue is the most frequently seen complaint in pwMS [3]. PwMS have to cope with the difficulties caused by the disability, which increases both psychological, physical, and cognitive fatigue. Our results revealed that those with higher disability (EDSS ≥ 4) and longer disease duration (> 5 years) had significantly higher fatigue scores. In contrast, depression scores were higher in the short-term group (≤ 5 years). It is possible that pwMS may face difficulties in coping with cognitive, emotional, behavioral, social, and physical factors affecting the adaptation of the individual to the disease in the early stages. Furthermore, the information-processing speeds of the group with fatigue were significantly worse than that of the group without fatigue, using a similar cut-off in a previous study [20]. Although it is possible to presumptively claim that fatigue may have adverse effects on the cognitive skills of pwMS, recent studies indicate that the relationship with cognitive status and subjective fatigue may not be as significant as expected [35,35,37].

Some researchers define primary fatigue as the absence of other indications (pain, depression, poor sleep, life quality, etc.) related to this condition and secondary fatigue as when such symptoms are present [20]. Considering the cognitive effects of depression and fatigue symptoms coupling, the only significant difference found related to the SDMT. This analysis is necessary because fatigue and depression are frequently intertwined. They may not be differentiated, or one may obscure the other. This difference is observed in SDMT because the test requires high-level working memory as Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, with the information processing speed measuring primarily as a strong predictor of functional regression [27], suggesting the significant effect of fatigue on information processing speeds. These results demonstrated that SDMT denoted as a sentinel test [38] should be prioritized to identify the relationship between cognitive deterioration and disease-related factors in clinical practice.

Our results are consistent with the findings that pwMS with higher disability level is lower in cognitive performance [24, 31]. A previous study reported that SDMT, CVLT-II, and BVMT-R (5.9, 3.7, and 2.3 points, respectively) scores decreased when the EDSS was increased by 1 point [31]. We carried out a risk analysis of our study group using the BICAMS average of the control group in our study [16]. Finally, the disability was negatively related to SDMT (1.4 points), and CVLT-II (1.5 points) scores also parallel with the literature. Based on these results, attention should be paid to the importance of evaluating cognitive changes, for example, when assessing disease progression and severity [39].

The finding that no significant difference was found between the groups with/without depression in terms of BICAMS is unexpected in the current study. Also, there were no differences in pwMS with/without depression on any demographic or clinical characteristics. These results supported the findings of previous studies that used the same neuropsychological assessment [26, 34, 37]. Even if depression does not influence the objective neuropsychological performance of pwMS, some evidence suggests that it affects their subjective perception of CI and emphasizes to focus on patient-informant discrepancies in need of further multifaceted treatments [40, 41].

Research has shown disease duration to be predictive of SDMT [42] or both SDMT and CVLT-II [43]. As stated in the results, a significant difference could not be identified in BICAMS subtests between the short- and long-term groups by the fifth year from disease onset [44]. This difference stems from the heterogeneity of the characteristics of the sample (age, disability level, medications taken) and differences in evaluation tools. In several studies with larger samples, more extensive and detailed cognitive batteries, or longitudinal design, the relationship between the disease duration and cognitive functions was demonstrated [23, 33, 45]. Thus, cross-sectional or longitudinal studies in pwMS with longer disease duration are needed.

The current study had several limitations. First, we could not obtain distinct and robust data about whether demographic and clinical variables may lead to the probability of increasing CI during the disease course due to the low representation of people with SPMS and PPMS. A second limitation of our study is a lack of cognitive measures related to the effect of depression and fatigue on delayed verbal recall. In addition to this limitation, our findings regarding depression and fatigue frequency probably reflect the low disability level and short disease duration of the study group. The identification of fatigue and depression may also have been lower because the adaptation of pwMS to their continuing treatment was high, the medical team gave them adequate information, and they participated in activities that could increase their life quality. It can be considered that the individual differences between the cognitive profiles of pwMS complicate the act of reaching a definitive conclusion. Thus, pwMS should be matched in terms of age, gender, education, and premorbid intellectual functioning (cognitive reserve) [46]; the collective effects of factors affecting the cognitive functions should also be examined in detail in longitudinal studies.

In conclusion, the existence of depression and fatigue symptoms concur is devastating consequences on information processing speed, and the increasing severity of fatigue and disability makes it difficult to cope with the already present cognitive insufficiency. There is a clear need for research toward the psychological resilience of pwMS in the early stages for developing the ability to cope with MS-related problems. Additionally, this study encourages using BICAMS evaluating cognitive functions quickly, in routine neuropsychological assessment in MS since it is a predictor of disability. Here, BICAMS was applied in a broader MS population when compared with similar studies conducted in Turkey. These data are supportive that early detection of CI and determining those who carry risk factors early for boosting the value of neurorehabilitation can facilitate benefit from early intervention and improve pwMS’s quality of life.