Abstract
The collection and sale of non-timber forest products is a major source of livelihood in some regions of Nepal. The research reported in this paper compares the resource rent or contribution margin of collectors, village traders, Nepali wholesalers and Indian traders for two highly traded non-timber forest products of Nepal, namely asparagus and lichen. The causes of inequitable margins are investigated, and measures for increasing equity within the supply chain are identified. The research revealed that the margin of asparagus collectors was higher than for the lichen collectors, as lichen was subjected to the high transaction costs of illegal exports. Furthermore, collectors who stayed overnight in the forest during the collection period (overnight-stayers) to reduce travelling time had a higher margin than those who went home every day after collection (non-overnight-stayers). In four distinct trading chains analysed, Nepali wholesalers and Indian traders captured most of the resource rent. The difference in collection costs between overnight-stayers and non-overnight-stayers does not affect the margin of other stakeholders in the value chain. It was hypothesised that the inequity is exacerbated by a low level of understanding of marketing among collectors, and this is confirmed by survey results. It is argued that the margin of collectors could be increased by providing training, technical support, market and price information, and other forms of institutional support.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ANSAB (Asia Network for Small Scale Bio-resources) (1998), Nepal NTFPs Network Newsletter, March 1998, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Beer, J.H.D. and McDermott, M.J. (1996), The Economic Value of Non-timber Forest Products in South East Asia, 2nd revised edition, The Netherlands Committee for IUCN, Amsterdam.
BPP (Biodiversity Profile Project) (1995), Enumeration of the Lichens of Nepal, HMG Nepal and Government of Netherlands, Kathmandu, Nepal.
CBED (Community Based Economic Development Project) (1999), Sub-sector Analysis of High Altitude NTFPs in the Karnali Zone, Volume 1, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Department of Plant Resources (1995), Medicinal Plants of Nepal for Aurvedic Drugs, Thapathali, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Edward, D.M. (1996), Non-timber Forest Products from Nepal: Aspects of the Trade in Medicinal and Aromatic Plants, FORSEC Monograph 1/96, Forest Research Service Centre, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Babarmahal, Katmandu, Nepal.
Kanel, K.R. (1999), ‘Policy related issues in non-timber forest products business’, in R.B. Rawal, B. Bhatta and A. Paudyal (eds), Non timber Forest Produces: Production, Collection and Trade of NTFPs in Mid Western Development Region of Nepal, Kathmandu: HMG, USAID, BSP and New ERAl.
Kanel, K.R., Chapagain, D.P. and Regmi, D.C. (1999), Current Policy and Legal Context of the Forestry Sector with Reference to the Community Forestry Program in Nepal, a draft submitted to Nepal-UK Community Forestry Project, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Kirtikar, K.R. and Basu, B.D. (1993), Indian Medicinal Plants (2nd ed.), Vol. 1–4, 1935 reprint, Periodical Experts, Delhi.
Malla, S.B. (1995), Minor Forest Products (NTFPs) of Nepal: General Status and Trade, FRIS, Project Paper No. 4, HMGN/FINNIDA, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Maraseni, T.N. (2002), Harvesting Techniques and Market Analysis of Selected Non Timber Forest Products in Makawanpur District, Nepal, a thesis submitted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, AIT, Bangkok, Thailand.
Maraseni, T.N., and Shivakoti G. (2003), ‘Enhancement of harvesting and marketing policies for non-timber forest products in Nepal’, in A.J. Hiremath, C. Gladwi. and R. Uma Shankar (eds), Proceedings of the South Asian Regional workshop on Policies, Utilization and Conservation of Non Timber Forest Products in South Asia Region, 28–30 April 2003, Bangalore, India.
MFSC (Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation) (1989), Master Plan for Forestry Sector, Main Report, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
MFSC (Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation) (1993), Forest Act 1993, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
MFSC (Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation) (1995), Forest Regulation 1995, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Ministry of Local Development (1999), Local Governance Act 1999, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Mittelman A.J., Lai, C.K., Byron, N. Michon, G. and Katz, E. (1998), ‘Non-wood forests products: outlook study for Asia and Pacific towards 2010’, in Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study Working Paper Series, No. 28, FAO, Rome.
NPC (National Planning Commission) (1999), Nepal’s Ninth Plan Report, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
NPC (National Planning Commission) (2002), Draft of Tenth plan 2002–2007, His Majesty’s Government of Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Olsen, C.S. (1999), Commercial Non- timber Forestry in Central Nepal: Emerging Themes and Priorities, a PhD. dissertation submitted in the Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Pandit, R. (2002), Institutionalizing Forest User Groups through the Practice of Community Forestry of Nepal: A Case Study in Tanahun District, Western Development Region, a thesis submitted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, AIT, Bangkok, Thailand.
Shahi B.B. (2000), Sustainable Community Forest Management in the Mid hills of Nepal: Practices, Problems and Prospects, a thesis submitted as partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science, AIT, Bangkok, Thailand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maraseni, T.N., Shivakoti, G.P., Cockfield, G. et al. Nepalese non-timber forest products: An analysis of the equitability of profit distribution across a supply chain to India. Small-scale Forestry 5, 191–206 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-006-0010-8
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-006-0010-8