Abstract
Human enamel has a complex micro-structure that varies with distance from the tooth’s outer surface. But contributions from the microstructure to the fracture toughness and the mechanisms of crack growth resistance have not been explored in detail. In this investigation the apparent fracture toughness of human enamel and the mechanisms of crack growth resistance were evaluated using the indentation fracture approach and an incremental crack growth technique. Indentation cracks were introduced on polished surfaces of enamel at selected distances from the occlusal surface. In addition, an incremental crack growth approach using compact tension specimens was used to quantify the crack growth resistance as a Junction of distance from the occlusal surface. There were significant differences in the apparent toughness estimated using the two approaches, which was attributed to the active crack length and corresponding scale of the toughening mechanisms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
A.R. Ten Cate, Oral Histology: Development, Structure and Function, Vol. 5 (St. Louis, MO: Mosby, 1998), pp. 208–212.
C. Robinson, J. Kirkham, and R. Shore, Dental Enamel: Formation to Destruction (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1995), pp. 151–152.
H. Chai et al., Proc. Waff. Acad. Sci. USA, 106 (2009), pp. 7289–7293.
R. Hassan, A A Caputo, and R.F. Bunshah, J. Dent. Res., 60 (1981), pp. 820–827.
H.H.K. Xu et al., J. Dent. Res., 77 (1998), pp. 472–480.
S.N. White et al., J. Dent. Res., 80 (2001), pp. 321–326.
S. Park et al., Dent. Mater., 24 (2008), pp. 1477–1485.
D. Bajaj and D. Arola, Biomaterials, 30 (2009), pp. 4037–4046.
D. Zhang et al., Exp. Mech., 47 (2007), pp. 325–336.
K. Niihara, Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol. 5, ed. R.C. Bradt et al. (New York: Plenum Publishing Co., 1983), pp. 97–105.
D. Zhang, M. Luo, and D. Arola, Opt Eng., 45 (2006), pp. 1–9.
G.D. Quinn and R.C. Bradt, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 90 (2007), pp. 673–680.
G.D. Quinn, Mechanical Properties and Performance of Engineering Ceramics II: Ceramic Engineering and Science Proceedings, 27 (2007), pp. 45–62.
D. Munz, J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 90 (2007), pp, 1–15.
J.J. Kruzic et al., J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 2 (2009), pp. 384–395.
V. Imbeni et al., Nat. Mater., 4 (2005), pp. 229–232.
T.L. Anderson, Fracture Mechanics: Fundamentals and Applications 3rd edition (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2005).
Z. Xie et al., Biomaterials, 29 (2008), pp. 2697–2703.
D. Bajaj and D. Arola, Acta Biomat., 5 (2009), pp. 3045–3056.
A.C. Fisher-Cripps and B.R. Lawn, Acta Mater., 44 (1996), pp. 519–527.
B.R. Lawn, A.G. Evans, and D.B. Marshall, J.Am. Ceram. Soc., 63 (1980), pp. 574–581.
J.J.W. Lee et al., J. Dent. Res., 88 (2000), pp. 224–228.
R.F. Cook and G.M. Pharr, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73 (1990), pp. 787–817.
G. Sines and M. Adams, Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol. 3, ed. R.C. Bradt, D.P.H. Hasselman, and F.F. Lange (New York: Plenum Press, 1978), pp. 403–434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bajaj, D., Park, S., Quinn, G.D. et al. Fracture processes and mechanisms of crack growth resistance in human enamel. JOM 62, 76–82 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-010-0113-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-010-0113-8