Abstract
The aim of present investigation was to study the effect of storage conditions on percentage germination of encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis Lour × C. deliciosa Tenora). Different batches of encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos were preserved at room temperature, 4°C, in liquid nitrogen as such and by embedding in liquid paraffin. In the encapsulated somatic embryos stored at room temperature in sealed Petri plates, percentage of germination was 24.99%, but 5.55% in non-encapsulated embryos after 3 days of storage. Encapsulated embryos stored in vials containing liquid paraffin at room temperature were germinated at 18.05% after 60 days of storage, while it was 13.88% in non-encapsulated embryos after 45 days of storage. Encapsulated somatic embryos stored at 4°C in sealed Petri plates remained viable for up to 75 days with 6.94% germination, whereas non-encapsulated embryos remained viable for up to 45 days with 24.99% germination. Encapsulated embryos stored at 4°C in vials filled with paraffin germinated at 11.11% after 120 days of storage, but 5.55% in non-encapsulated embryos after 90 days of storage. Encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos stored in liquid nitrogen showed 58.33 and 51.38% survival, respectively, after 7 months of storage. The plantlets developed from these embryos were transplanted after acclimatization and are growing normal.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis × C. deliciosa) is one of the most economically important fruit crops of India. In recent years, Kinnow production in Punjab has been greatly affected due to Indian citrus ringspot virus infection, which has resulted in tremendous loss in yield and quality of this fruit crop. This has necessitated the development of strategies for controlling viral diseases and production of healthy virus free Kinnow orchards in the country, especially in Punjab. Recently, we demonstrated somatic embryogenesis from unfertilized ovules of Kinnow to produce virus free plants (Singh et al. 2005). Somatic embryogenesis is a powerful tool and has a potential application for clonal propagation of virus free plants. However, retention of embryogenic potential of embryogenic cells during long-term maintenance is difficult and the risk of occurrence of somaclonal variation increases with increasing culture durations (Wang et al. 2004). Frequent subculture of embryogenic cultures which has been found beneficial in preventing browning (Bornhoff and Harst 2000) and promoting embryo development (Coutos-Thevenot et al. 1992) is costly and laborious. The maintenance of virus free material (sanitorized lines) by in vivo or active in vitro conditions can be very expensive and not cost optimal. The risk of losing plants due to diseases, climate conditions or human errors is high (Brison et al. 1995). Therefore, in order to make the system economically viable, many workers have attempted to prepare synthetic seeds by encapsulation of somatic embryos in an alginate matrix (Kitto and Janick 1985; Redenbaugh et al. 1986). Synthetic seed technology is an important application of micropropagation that offers several advantages, e.g. easy handling, storability, reduced size of propagules, transportability, conversion to plantlets, etc. (Gosh and Sen 1994; Onishi et al. 1994; Guerra et al. 1999). One of the main objectives of this technology is to develop a clonal propagation system that will enable the vegetative propagule to be stored for long periods of time and at the same time enable multiplication of plant (Janeiro et al. 1997).
It has been reported that both encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos of interior and black spruce survived 1 month of storage at 4°C with no loss in germination capacity (Lulsdorf et al. 1993). Similarly, Rao and Bapat (1993) reported that encapsulated embryos of Santalum album retained their germinability (18%) after storage at 4°C for 45 days. Cold storage of encapsulated embryos is important for post storage survival and germination. Cryopreservation has been considered as an ideal tool for long-term storage of germplasm during which all cellular divisions and metabolic processes of stored cells are stopped. Theoretically, the plant materials can thus be stored without any changes for an indefinite period of time (Engelmann 1997), and the procedure guarantees long-term storage of germplasm in an unaltered stage. Synthetic seed research has been carried out in a number of species including carrot (Timbert et al. 1996), alfalfa (Redenbaugh et al. 1986), conifers (Fowke et al. 1994), high value vegetable crops like celery, lettuce (Sanada et al. 1993) and pistachio (Onay et al. 1996), and a few woody species (Gray 1987; Bapat and Rao 1988; Rao and Bapat 1993).
This communication describes conservation strategies for somatic embryos of Kinnow mandarin by comparing the germination potential of encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos under different storage conditions.
Materials and methods
Production of somatic embryos
Somatic embryos of Kinnow (C. nobilis × C deliciosa) were obtained from unfertilized ovules as previously described (Singh et al. 2005). The ovules were cultured on MS medium (Murashige and Skoog 1962) supplemented with kinetin (KN) (9.29 μM) containing 3% (w/v) sucrose and 0.8% (w/v) agar (SRL, Mumbai) with pH adjusted to 5.6 and autoclaved at 121°C and 15 lb in−2 pressure for 20 min. The somatic embryos were allowed to mature on the same medium and embryos at heart-shaped stage to torpedo stage were used for encapsulation.
Encapsulation
Freshly developed embryos, mixed with sodium alginate (4%) prepared in liquid MS medium with 3% sucrose at pH 5.6, were dropped into 75 mM CaCl2·2H2O using a wide glass dropper. The drops (beads), each containing single embryo, were kept in CaCl2·2H2O solution for 45 min on a rotary shaker (70 rpm). Beads were recovered by decanting CaCl2 solution. Beads containing no or more than one somatic embryos were eliminated. They were then thoroughly washed with distilled water and surface dried by spreading on sterile filter paper for 30 min in laminar cabinet. All the steps involved in the preparation of synthetic seeds were carried out aseptically in the laminar flow cabinet.
Storage conditions
Different batches of encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos were preserved at room temperature, 4°C, and in liquid nitrogen as such, and by embedding in liquid paraffin. Autoclaved airtight vials filled with liquid paraffin and sterilized Petri plates were used for storage at room temperature and at 4°C. For storage in liquid nitrogen, encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos (10/vial) were transferred to autoclaved cryovials (10 ml) containing 10% (v/v) DMSO and 0.4 M sucrose in liquid MS medium. These vials were kept at 4°C for 30 min, 0°C for 24 h, frozen slowly in an ultra cooling bath (Yorko) to −20°C and then transferred to liquid nitrogen.
Germination
The encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos were allowed to germinate on simple MS medium or MS medium with different concentrations of KN (4.64, 9.29, 13.94 and 18.59 μM) to find out the best suitable medium for germination. The encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos stored at room temperature in sealed Petri plates were cultured on medium after every 24 h to check their germination. The encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos without storage were cultured along with each experiment as control. The encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos stored in sealed Petri plates at 4°C and in vials filled with liquid paraffin stored at room temperature or at 4°C were checked for their germination after every 15 days until they responded. The encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos stored in liquid nitrogen were checked for their viability after 1 h of storage and after every 1 month from date of storage and percent germination was calculated. Cryotubes removed from LN were rapidly warmed in a water bath at 40°C for 4 min and encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos were washed in autoclaved distilled water. All cultures were maintained at 26 ± 1°C with a luminous intensity of 40 μmol m−2 s−1 and 16:8 h photoperiod. The germination frequency of all encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos was recorded after 15 days of inoculation.
Statistical analysis
For evaluation of viability of encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos stored at each condition, 24 tubes were inoculated along with control and the experiments were repeated thrice. The data obtained from above experiments were subjected to one-way analysis of variance test, and the differences among means were compared by high-range statistical domain using Tukey’s test (Meyers and Grossen 1974).
Results
Encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos cultured on MS medium supplemented with different concentrations of kinetin showed signs of germination after 6–8 days of inoculation (Fig. 1a) when roots of the embryo pierced the alginate matrix. Similarly, roots of non-encapsulated embryos started penetrating into the medium after 5–6 days of inoculation and established contact with the medium; subsequently, shoots also emerged. The successive stages of synthetic seed germination are shown in Fig. 1a. The somatic embryos, both encapsulated and non-encapsulated, failed to germinate on MS medium without kinetin (control). Among the various concentrations of kinetin tested, kinetin at 9.29 μM was found to be most effective with 81.94% germination for encapsulated and 86.11% germination for non-encapsulated somatic embryos (Table 1). The same medium was used for further studies on germination frequency of preserved synthetic seeds. Table 2 shows the effect of storage at room temperature in Petri plates on percentage germination of encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos. The percentage germination of encapsulated embryos decreased with increase in duration of storage with 80.55% for 24 h, 62.49% for 48 h, 24.99% for 72 h and very low or almost negligible at 96 h (1.38%). Similarly, percentage survival of non-encapsulated somatic embryos also decreased with increase in duration of storage up to 72 h. Further increase in storage duration at room temperature resulted in 0% survival of both encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos. Table 3 shows the effect of storage of somatic embryos at 4°C in Petri dishes on percentage germination. As seen in this table, percent germination of non-encapsulated and encapsulated somatic embryos decreased with increase in storage duration from 0–75 days. Encapsulated embryos could be stored at 4°C for maximum of 75 days with 6.94% germination. Further increase in storage duration showed no response for germination of both encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos. Effect of storage at room temperature in vials filled with paraffin liquid on percentage germination of encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos is shown in Table 4. Encapsulated embryos could be stored in liquid paraffin at room temperature for a maximum of 75 days with 2.77% germination frequency, while non-encapsulated embryos showed germination frequency of 13.88% after 45 days of storage in liquid paraffin. As seen in Table 5, both encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos could be stored in liquid paraffin for longer duration at 4°C. Encapsulated somatic embryos could be stored in liquid paraffin at 4°C for 120 days as compared to 75 days for room temperature. Effect of storage in liquid nitrogen on percentage germination of encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos is shown in Table 6. The percentage germination of 68.05% for encapsulated and 62.49% for non-encapsulated somatic embryos was observed after 1 h of preservation in liquid nitrogen. A slight decrease in percentage germination of encapsulated (66.66%) and non-encapsulated (61.11%) somatic embryos was observed after 1 month of storage which further decreased to 58.33 and 51.38%, respectively, after 7 months of storage. This decrease in percentage germination observed between 1 and 7 months of storage was found to be statistically insignificant. The plantlets developed from these embryos were transplanted after acclimatization and are growing normal.
Discussion
The present results demonstrate the feasibility of preservation techniques to store virus free somatic embryos. Considering the importance of virus free propagation by somatic embryogenesis, developing a method of preservation is essential. Storage is not only beneficial for long-term usage but also prevents any somaclonal variation that may ensue the long-term maintenance of the embryogenic tissue (Ford et al. 2000). Synthetic seeds (encapsulated embryos) germinated without storage showed good germination percentage as alginate matrix, which facilitates regular nutrient supply and protects the somatic embryos from any mechanical injury during handling and from desiccation. This observation is in accordance with previous results (Sharma et al. 1992; Timbert et al. 1996; Naik and Chikkagouda 1997; Rodriguez et al. 2001; Malabadi and Nataraja 2002; Ipekci and Gozukirmizi 2003; Singh and Krishnasamy 2004). The encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos stored at room temperature in sealed Petri plates remained viable for only 3–4 days. Encapsulated embryos stored in vials containing liquid paraffin remained viable up to 75 days and non-encapsulated for 45 days. These findings are in accordance with some of the earlier findings reported in other plants, e.g. Schultheis et al. (1990) stored encapsulated somatic embryos of Ipomoea batatas (Ipomoea) at room temperature for 6 days and observed 40% viability in potassium starch acrylamide, 100% in Hydroxyethylcellulose and 0% in potassium acrylate. Encapsulated somatic embryos stored at 4°C in sealed Petri plates and in vials filled with paraffin germinated for only up to 75 and 120 days of storage, respectively. Bapat and Rao (1988) successfully germinated somatic embryos of S. album (sandalwood) after 45 days of storage at 4°C and observed that germination rate was reduced to 10%. Sharma et al. (1992) observed that percentage conversion of encapsulated protocorm like bodies of Dendrocalamus wardianum declined with increase in duration of storage at 4°C with a maximum of 100% up to 45 days and a minimum of 10% after 180 days of storage. Gill et al. (1994) observed 70% viability of encapsulated somatic embryos of geranium after 45 days of storage at 4°C. Sunilkumar (2000) observed 75% viability after 4 weeks of storage of excised embryos of Hopea parviflora. Soneji et al. (2002) observed that encapsulated shoots of pineapple (Ananas comosus) when stored at 4°C for 15, 30, 45 to 60 days show 75, 66.6, 29.17 and 8.33% viability, respectively. Ipekci and Gozukirmizi (2003) observed germination frequencies of 43.2 and 32.4% after 30 and 60 days of storage at 4°C. Singh and Krishnasamy (2004) stored encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos at 4°C for 60 days and observed viability of 6% for encapsulated and 0% for non-encapsulated embryos. Tsvetkov and Hausman (2005) observed 95% viability of encapsulated apical microcutting of Quercus robur (Turkey oak) after 42 days (6 weeks) of storage at 4°C. In the present study, the cryopreserved encapsulated and non-encapsulated embryos immediately after preservation (1 h) showed germination percentage of 68.05 and 62.49%, respectively, as compared to 81.94 and 86.11% for unstored encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos, respectively. Further storage of these somatic embryos resulted in only a slight decrease in percentage germination of encapsulated (66.66%) and non-encapsulated (61.11%) somatic embryos after 1 month of storage, which further decreased to 58.33 and 51.38%, respectively, after 7 months of storage. The encapsulated embryos subjected to cryopreservation without slow freezing and recovered without fast thawing did not show any regrowth even when cryoprotectant was used. The treatment most conducive for survival of encapsulated embryos in liquid nitrogen was observed to be 10% DMSO in Liquid MS medium with 3% sucrose. DMSO has been widely used as cryoprotectant in different plants, such as Citrus sinensis (Kobayashi et al. 1990; Sakai et al. 1990), Anigozanthos viridis (Turner et al. 2001), Dioscorea floribunda (Ahuja et al. 2002), Porphyra yezoensis (Liu et al. 2004), and Musa sp. (Panis et al. 2005). Wang et al. (2002) cryopreserved embryogenic cell suspension of Vitis vinifera (grapevine) by encapsulation–dehydration and observed 78% survival immediately after preservation. Fang et al. (2004) immersed encapsulated somatic embryos of cacao (Theobroma cacao) in LN and observed 63% survival. Panis et al. (2005) cryopreserved shoot tips from in vitro raised banana plants using 30% glycerol, 15% ethylene glycol and 15% DMSO as cryoprotectant solution and observed viability of 52.9%. Cryopreservation was found most suitable for preservation of virus free cultures for longer duration and storage at 4°C was found to be most suitable for short-term storage. The synthetic seeds germinate to produce well-developed plantlets when cultured on germination medium after 4–5 weeks of culture (Fig. 1b). The plantlets developed from these embryos were transplanted (Fig. 1c) after acclimatization and are growing normal.
This study showed that cryopreservation of encapsulated somatic embryos can be used for conservation of desired disease free stocks of Kinnow mandarin.
References
Ahuja S, Mandal BB, Dixit S, Srivastava PS (2002) Molecular, phenotypic and biosynthetic stability in Dioscorea floribunda plants derived from cryopreserved shoot tips. Plant Sci 163:971–977
Bapat VA, Rao PS (1988) Sandalwood plantlets from ‘synthetic seeds’. Plant Cell Rep 7:434–436
Bornhoff BA, Harst M (2000) Establishment of embryo suspension cultures of grapevines (Vitis L.). Vitis 39:27–29
Brison M, De Boucaud MT, Dosba F (1995) Cryopreservation of in vitro grown shoot tips of two interspecific Prunus rootstocks. Plant Sci 105:235–242
Coutos-Thevenot P, Goebel-Trourand I (1992) Improvement of embryo development by changes in culture conditions. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 29:125–133
Engelmann F (1997) In vitro conservation methods. In: Ford-Lloyd BV, Newbury HJ, Callow JA (eds) Biotechnology and plant genetic resources: conservation and use. CABI, Wallingford, pp 119–162
Fang JY, Wetten A, Hadley P (2004) Cryopreservation of cacoa (Theobroma cacao L.) somatic embryos for long-term germplasm storage. Plant Sci 166:669–675
Ford CS, Jones NB, Van-Staden J (2000) Cryopreservation and plant regeneration from somatic embryos of Pinus patula. Plant Cell Rep 19:610–615
Fowke LC, Attree SM, Pomeroy MK (1994) Production of vigorous desiccation-tolerant white spruce [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss.] synthetic seeds in a bioreactor. Plant Cell Rep 13:601–606
Gill R, Senaratna T, Saxena PK (1994) Thidiazuron-induced somatic embryogenesis enhances viability of hydrogel-encapsulated somatic embryos of geranium. J Plant Physiol 143:726–729
Gosh B, Sen S (1994) Plant regeneration from alginate encapsulated somatic embryos of Asparagus cooperi Baker. Plant Cell Rep 9:189–194
Gray DJ (1987) Quiescence in monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous somatic embryos induced by dehydration. Hort Science 22:810–814
Guerra MP, Torres AC, Teixeira JB (1999) Embriogenese somatica e semente sintetica. In: Torres AC, Caldas LS, Buso JA (eds) Cultura de Tecidos e Transformacao Genetica de plantas, vol 2. Embrapa-SPI/CNPH, Brasilia, pp 533–568
Ipekci Z, Gozukirmizi N (2003) Direct somatic embryogenesis and synthetic seed production from Paulownia elongata. Plant Cell Rep 22:16–24
Janeiro LV, Ballester A, Vietez AM (1997) In vitro response of encapsulated somatic embryos of camellia. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 51:119–125
Kitto S, Janick J (1985) Hardening treatments increase survival of synthetically-coated asexual embryos of carrot. J Am Soc Hort Sci 110:283–286
Kobayashi S, Sakai A, Oiyama I (1990) Cryopreservation in liquid nitrogen of cultured navel orange (Citrus sinenesis Osb.) nucellar cells and subsequent plant regeneration. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 23:15–20
Liu H, Wengong Y, Dai J, Gong Q, Yang K, Lu X (2004) Cryopreservation of protoplasts of the alga Porphyra yezoensis by vitrification. Plant Sci 166:97–102
Lulsdorf MM, Tautorus TE, Kikcio SI, Bethume TD, Dunstan DI (1993) Germination of encapsulated embryos of interior spruce (Picea glauca engelmannii complex) and black spruce (Picea mariana Mill.). Plant Cell Rep 12:385–389
Malabadi RB, Nataraja K (2002) In vitro storage of synthetic seeds in Clitoria ternatea Linn. Phytomorphology 52:231–243
Meyers LS, Grossen NE (1974) Analysis of independent group designs. In: Behavioral research, theory, procedure and design. Freeman, San Francisco, pp 237–252
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Naik GR, Chikkagouda NR (1997) Production and regeneration of synthetic seeds in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Indian Sugar 5:125–130
Onay A, Jeffree CE, Yeoman MM (1996) Plant regeneration from encapsulated embryoids and an embryogenic mass of pistachio, Pistachio vera L. Plant Cell Rep 15:723–726
Onishi N, Sakamoto Y, Hirosawa T (1994) Synthetic seeds as an application of mass production of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 39:137–145
Panis B, Piette B, Swennen R (2005) Droplet vitrification of apical meristems: a cryopreservation protocol applicable to all Musaceae. Plant Sci 168:45–55
Rao PS, Bapat VA (1993) Micropropagation of sandalwood (Santalum album L.) and mulberry (Morus indica L.). In: Ahuja MR (ed) Micropropagation of woody plants. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 317–345
Redenbaugh K, Paash BD, Nichol JW, Kossler ME, Viss PR, Walker KA (1986) Somatic seeds: encapsulation of asexual plant embryos. Biotechnology 4:797–801
Rodriguez NS, Feijoo JCL, Sherry MTB, Olmedo RLG, Mudwall RT, Sources AG (2001) Composition of endospermo artificial for mandarin embryos Cleopatra (Citrus reshni ex-Hort So). Rev Agron Face (Maracay) 27:11–15
Sakai AS, Kobayashi S, Oiyama I (1990) Cryopreservation of nucellar cells of naval orange (Citrus sinensis Osb. Var. brasiliensis Tanaka) by vitrification. Plant Cell Rep 9:30–33
Sanada M, Sakamoto Y, Hayashi M, Mashiko T, Okamato A, Ohnishi N (1993) Celery and lettuce. In: Redenbaugh K (ed) Synseeds: applications of synthetic seeds to crop improvement. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 305–327
Schultheis JR, Cantliffe DJ, Chee RP (1990) Optimizing sweet potato (Ipomoea batatus) root and plantlet formation by selection of proper embryo developmental stage and size and gel type for fluidizing sowing. Plant Cell Rep 9:356–359
Sharma A, Tandon P, Kumar A (1992) Regeneration of Dendrobium wardianum Warner (Orchidaceae) from synthetic seeds. Indian J Exp Biol 30:747–748
Singh S, Krishnasamy V (2004) Study on synthetic seeds in hybrid rice. Seed Res 32:1–4
Singh B, Sharma S, Rani G, Zaidi AA, Hallan V, Nagpal A, Virk GS (2005) In vitro production of Indian citrus ringspot virus-free plants of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis Lour X C. deliciosa Tenora) by ovule culture. J Plant Biotech 7:259–265
Soneji JR, Rao PS, Mhatre M (2002) Germination of synthetic seeds of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.). Plant Cell Rep 20:891–894
Sunilkumar KK (2000) An attempt to improve storage life of Hopea parviflora seeds through synthetic seed production. Seed Res 28:126–130
Timbert R, Barbotin JN, Thomas D (1996) Enhancing carrot somatic embryos survival during slow dehydration, by encapsulation and control of dehydration. Plant Sci 120:215–222
Tsvetkov I, Hausman JF (2005) In vitro regeneration from alginate-encapsulated microcuttings of Quercus sp. Sci Hortic 103:503–507
Turner S, Krauss SL, Bunn E, Senaratna T, Dixon K, Tan B, Touchell D (2001) Genetic fidelity and viability of Anigozanthos viridis following tissue culture, cold storage and cryopreservation. Plant Sci 161:1099–1106
Wang Q, Gafny R, Sahar N, Sela I, Mawassi M, Tanne E, Perl A (2002) Cryopreservation of grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) embryogenic cell suspensions by encapsulation-dehydration and subsequent plant regeneration. Plant Sci 162:551–558
Wang Q, Mawassi M, Nachman S, Li P, Colova-Tsolova V, Gafny R, Sela I, Tanne E, Perl A (2004) Cryopreservation of grapevine (Vitis spp.) embryogenic cell suspensions by encapsulation-vitrification. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 77:267–275
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi (India) for providing the financial assistance, Dr P.S Ahuja, Director, IHBT, Palampur for providing necessary facilities and Dr Gurkanwal Singh, Deputy Director, Horticulture cum Nodal Officer Citrus, Channi Kalan, Hoshiarpur, Punjab for helpful suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, B., Sharma, S., Rani, G. et al. In vitro response of encapsulated and non-encapsulated somatic embryos of Kinnow mandarin (Citrus nobilis Lour × C. deliciosa Tenora). Plant Biotechnol Rep 1, 101–107 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-007-0015-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-007-0015-6