Abstract
The lack of knowledge concerning modelling existing buildings leads to signifiant variability in fragility curves for single or grouped existing buildings. This study aims to investigate the uncertainties of fragility curves, with special consideration of the single-building sigma. Experimental data and simplified models are applied to the BRD tower in Bucharest, Romania, a RC building with permanent instrumentation. A three-step methodology is applied: (1) adjustment of a linear MDOF model for experimental modal analysis using a Timoshenko beam model and based on Anderson’s criteria, (2) computation of the structure’s response to a large set of accelerograms simulated by SIMQKE software, considering twelve ground motion parameters as intensity measurements (IM), and (3) construction of the fragility curves by comparing numerical interstory drift with the threshold criteria provided by the Hazus methodology for the slight damage state. By introducing experimental data into the model, uncertainty is reduced to 0.02 considering S d (f 1) as seismic intensity IM and uncertainty related to the model is assessed at 0.03. These values must be compared with the total uncertainty value of around 0.7 provided by the Hazus methodology.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aldea A, Iiba M, Demetriu S and Kashima T (2007), “Evidence of Soil-structure Interaction from Earthquake Records at a High-rise Building Site in Bucharest,” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, paper 1523.
Aldea A, Kashima T, Lungu D, Vacareanu R, Koyama S and Arion C (2004), “Modern Urban Seismic Network in Bucharest, Romania,” Proceedings of the First International Conference on Urban Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Japan.
Aldea A, Kashima T, Poiata N and Kajiwara T (2006), “A New Digital Seismic Network in Romania with Dense Instrumentation in Bucharest,” Proceedings of First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anderson JG (2004), “Quantitative Measure of the Goodness-of-fit of Synthetic Seismograms,” Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, paper 243.
Arias A (1970), “A Measure of Earthquake Intensity,” in Seismic Design for Nuclear Power plants, R.J. Hansen, ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA438-483.
Bard PY (1988), “The Importance of Rocking in Building Motion: an Experimental Evidence,” Proceedings of the Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Tokyo-Kyoto, 8: 333–338.
Boutin C, Hans S, Ibraim E and Roussillon P (2005), “In Situ Experiments and Seismic Analysis of Existing Buildings. Part II: Seismic Integrity Threshold,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(12): 1531–1546.
Brincker R, Zhang L and Andersen P (2001) “Modal Identification of Output Only Systems Using Frequency Domain Decomposition,” Smart Materials and Structures, 10: 441–445.
Cabañas L, Benito B and Herraiz M (1997), “An Approach to the Measurement of the Potential Structural Damage of Earthquake Ground Motions,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26(1): 79–92.
Calvi G, Pinho R, Magenes G, Bommer J, Restrepo-Velez L and Crowley H (2006), “Development of Seismic Vulnerability Assessment Methodologies over the Past 30 Years,” Indian Society Journal of Earthquake Technology, 43(3): 75–104.
Causse M, Laurendeau A, Perrault M, Douglas J, Bonnilla LF and Gueguen P (2013), “A Set of Eurocode 8-compatible Synthetic Time-series as Input to Dynamic Analysis,” Submitted to Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.
Celebi M, Phan LT and Marshall RD (1993), “Dynamic Characteristics of Five Tall Buildings during Strong and Low-amplitude Motions,” The Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 2(1): 1–15.
CEN. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance. Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings, European Standard EN 1998-1: 2004, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium, 2004.
Clinton J, Bradford SC, Heaton TH and Favela J (2006), “The Observed Wander of the Natural Frequencies in a Structure,” Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(1): 237–257.
Clough RW and Penzien J (1993), Dynamics of Structures, Mc Graw-Hill: New-York.
Coburn A and Spence R (2002), Earthquake Protection, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
Crowley H and Pinho R (2004), “Period-height Relationship for Existing European Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8(1): 93–119.
Douglas J (2007) “Physical Vulnerability Modelling in Natural Hazard Risk Assessment,” Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 7(2): 283–288.
EPRI (1991), Standardization of the Cumulative Absolute Velocity, EPRI 1R-100082 Report, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2003a), HAZUS-MH MR3 Technical Manual, Washington, DC.
Federal Emergency Management Agency (2003b), ATC-13-1, Report: Commentary on the Use of ATC-13 Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for Probable Maximum Loss Studies of California Buildings, Washington, DC.
Gallipoli MR, Mucciarelli M, Šket-Motnikar B, Zupancic P, Gosar A, Prevolnik S, Herak M, Stipcevic J, Herak D, Milutinovic Z and Olumceva T (2010), “Empirical Estimates of Dynamic Parameters on a Large Set of European Buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(3): 593–607.
Gasparini DA and Vanmarcke EH (1976), Simulated Earthquake Motions Compatible with Prescribed Response Spectra, MIT Civil Engineering, Research Report R76-4, Massachussets Institute of Technology.
GNDT (1986), Instruzioni per la Compilazione de lla Sceda di Relivamento Esposizione e Vulnerabilità Sismica Degli Edifici, Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti, Regione Emilia Romagna y Regione Toscana, Italy. (in Italian)
Gueguen P, Michel C and LeCorre L (2007), “A Simplified Approach for Vulnerability Assessment in Moderate-to-low Seismic Hazard Regions: Application to Grenoble (France),” Bull Earthq. Engng., 4(3): 467–490. DOI: 10.1007/s10518-007-9036-3
Hans S (2002), “Auscultation Dynamique de bâtiments et modélisation par homogéneisation — Contribution à l’analyse de la vulnerabilité sismique”, PhD Thesis, INSA Lyon. (in French)
Hans S, Boutin C, Ibraim E and Roussillon P (2005), “In Situ Experiments and Seismic Analysis of Existing Buildings. Part I: Experimental Investigations,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 34(12): 1513–1529.
Housner GW (1952), “Intensity of Ground Motion during Strong Earthquakes,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Earthquake and Blast Effects on Structures, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, CA.
Jackson J (2006), “Fatal Attraction: Living with Earthquakes, the Growth of Villages into Megacities, and Earthquake Vulnerability in the Modern World,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A — Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364(1845): 1911–1925.
JICA (2007), Technical Cooperation Project, Reduction of Seismic Risk for Buildings and Structures with Romania, 2002–2007.
Kappos AJ, Panagopoulos G, Panagiotopoulos C and Penelis G (2006), “A Hybrid Method for the Vulnerability Assessment of R/C and URM Buildings,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 4(4): 391–413.
McGuire RK (2004), “Seismic Hazard and Risk Analysis,” Monograph MNO-10, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute (EERI).
Meli R, Faccioli E, Muria-Vila D, Quaas R and Paolucci R (1998), “A Study of Site Effects and Seismic Response of an Instrumented Building in Mexico City,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2(1): 89–111.
Michel C, Gueguen P and Bard PY (2008), “Dynamic Parameters of Structures Extracted from Ambient Vibration Measurements: an Aid for the Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Existing Buildings in Moderate Seismic Hazard Regions,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 28(8): 593–604.
Michel C, Gueguen P and Causse M (2012), “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment to Slight Damage Based on Experimental Modal Parameters,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 41(1): 81–98. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1119
Michel C, Gueguen P, El Arem S, Mazars J and Kotronis P (2010a), “Full-scale Dynamic Response of an RC Building under Weak Seismic Motions Using Earthquake Recordings, Ambient Vibrations and Modelling,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(4): 419–441.
Michel C, Gueguen P, Lestuzzi P and Bard PY (2010b), “Comparison between Seismic Vulnerability Models and Experimental Dynamic Properties of Existing Buildings in France,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(6): 1295–1307, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-010-9185-7.
Michel C, Hans S, Gueguen P and Boutin C (2006), “In Situ Experiment and Modelling of RC-structure Using Ambient Vibration and Timoshenko Beam,” Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, Paper 1246.
Mikael A, Gueguen P, Bard P-Y Roux P and Langlais M (2013), “Long-term Frequency and Damping Wandering in Buildings Analysed Using the Random Decrement Technique (RDT),” Bulletin of Seismological Society of America, 103(1): 236–246. DOI: 10.1785/0120120048.
Milutinovic ZV and Trendafiloski GS (2003), “Risk-UE: an Advanced Approach to Earthquake Risk Scenarios with Applications to Different European Towns,” WP4: Vulnerability of Current Buildings, European Project.
Mironescu M, Stanescu A, Brotea T, Bortnowski A, Sava V and Comanescu R (2003), “Modeling, Configuration and Analysis for High Importance Buildings,” Bulletin of the Association of Structural Design Engineers AICPS, Bucharest, 3: 1–17. (In Romania)
Nayeri RD, Masri SF, Ghanem RG and Nigbor RL (2008), “A Novel Approach for the Structural Identification and Monitoring of a Full-scale 17-story Building Based on Ambient Vibration Measurements,” Smart Materials and Structures, 17(2): 19p.
Onose JI (1982), “Prediction of Damage Ratio of Reinforced Concrete Buildings due to Earthquakes and Comparison with Actual Damage Ratio,” Proceedings of the 6th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo, 2081–2088.
Orsini G (1999), “A Model for Buildings’ Vulnerability Assessment Using the Parameterless Scale of Seismic Intensity (PSI),” Earthquake Spectra, 15(3): 463–483.
Péquegnat C, Gueguen P, Hatzfeld D and Langlais M (2008), “The French Accelerometric Network (RAP) and National Data Center (RAP-NDC),” Seismological Research Letters, 79(1): 79–89.
Perrault M and Gueguen P (2010), “Evaluation of the Seismic Damage with the Use of Experimental and Theoretical Models,” Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Ohrid, Macedonia, Paper 871.
Pierre JP and Montagne M (2004), “The 20 April 2002, M w 5.0 Au Sable Forks, New York, Earthquake: a Supplementary Source of Knowledge on Earthquake Damage to Lifelines and Buildings in Eastern North America,” Seismol Res Lett, 75(5): 626–635.
Pinho R, Bommer JJ and Glaister S (2002), “A Simplified Approach to Displacement-based Earthquake Loss Estimation Analysis,” Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, London, England, Paper 738.
Risk-UE (2003), “An Advanced Approach to Earthquake Risk Scenarios with Applications to Different European Towns. WP4: Vulnerability of Current Buildings,” European Project.
Rossetto T and Elnashai A (2003), “Derivation of Vulnerability Functions for European-type RC Structures Based on Observational Data,” Engineering Structures, 25(10): 1241–1263.
Seyedi M, Gehl P, Douglas J, Davenne L, Mehzer N and Ghavamian S (2010), “Development of Seismic Fragility Surfaces for Reinforced Concrete Buildings by Means of Nonlinear Time-history Analysis,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39(1): 91–108.
Singhal A and Kiremidjian AS (1997), “A Method for Earthquake Motion-damage Relationships with Application to Reinforced Concrete Frames,” State University of New York at Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (Report NCEER-97-0008).
Spence RJS, Bommer J, Del Re D, Bird J, Aydinoglu N and Tabuchi S (2003), “Comparison Loss Estimation with Observed Damage: A Study of the 1999 Kocaceli Earthquake in Turkey,” Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 1: 83–113.
Spence RJS, Coburn AW and Pomonis A (1992), “Correlation of Ground Motion with Building Damage: the Definition of a New Damage-based Seismic Intensity Scale,” 10th World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam, 551–556.
Todorovska MI and Trifunac MD (2007), “Damage Detection in the Imperial County Services Building. I: the Data and Time-frequency Analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27: 564–576.
Trifunac MD (1972), “Comparison between Ambient and Forced Vibration Experiments,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1(1); 33–150.
Turek M, Thibert K, Ventura C and Kuan S (2006), “Ambient Vibration Testing of Three Unreinforced Brick Masonry Buildings in Vancouver, Canada,” Proceedings of the 24th International Modal Analysis Conference (IMAC), Saint Louis, MI, USA.
Ventura CE and Ding Y (2000), “Linear and Nonlinear Seismic Response of a 52-story Steel Frame Building,” Structural Design of Tall Buildings, 9(1): 25–45.
Ventura CE, Liam Finn WD and Schuster ND (1995), “Seismic Response of Instrumented Structures During the 1994 Northridge California Earthquake,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 22: 316–337.
Volant P, Orbovic N and Dunand F (2002), “Seismic Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Facility Using Ambient Vibration Test to Characterize Dynamic Behavior of the Structure and Microtremor Measurements to Characterize the Soil: a Case Study,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22: 1159–1167.
Wald DJ, Quitoriano V, Heaton T and Kanamori H (1999), “Relationships between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California,” Earthquake Spectra, 15(3): 557–564.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Supported by: the ANR National Research Agency as Part of Its RiskNat Program (URBASIS project) under Grant No. ANR-09-RISK-009; the Rhône-Alpes Regional Council (Programme Vulnerabilité des Ouvrages aux Risques) and the Joseph Fourier Université (Grenoble 1)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perrault, M., Gueguen, P., Aldea, A. et al. Using experimental data to reduce the single-building sigma of fragility curves: case study of the BRD tower in Bucharest, Romania. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 12, 643–658 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0203-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-013-0203-z