Abstract
Surface water and groundwater always behave in a coupled manner and are major components of hydrologic cycle. However, surface water simulation models and groundwater simulation models are run separately most of the time. Few models focus on the impact of hydraulic changes in the surface water flows on the groundwater, or specifically, the impact of a water transfer project to fill a seasonally dry channel. In this study, a linked surface water and groundwater simulation model was developed to assess the impact of a trans-basin water diversion project on the groundwater. A typical plain area east of Beijing was selected as a case study, representing Beijing’s main source of groundwater used for drinking water. A surface water quality model of the Chaobai River was developed based on the Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program (WASP), and a groundwater model was developed based on the Modular Finite-Difference Groundwater Flow Model (MODFLOW) and the Modular 3-D transport model (MT3D). The results of the surface water simulation were used as input for the groundwater simulation. Water levels and four contaminants (NH3-N, CODMn, F, As) were simulated. With the same initial and boundary conditions, scenario analyses were performed to quantify the impact of different quantities of diversion water on the groundwater environment. The results showed the water quality of the groundwater sources was not significantly affected.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Winter T C. Relation of streams, lakes, and wetlands to groundwater flow systems. Hydrogeology Journal, 1999, 7(1): 28–45
Sophocleous M. Interactions between groundwater and surface water: the state of the science. Hydrogeology Journal, 2002, 10(1): 52–67
Yang Y S, Wang L. A review of modelling tools for implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive in handling diffuse water pollution. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(9): 1819–1843
Dor N, Syafalni S, Abustan I, Rahman M T A, Nazri M A A, Mostafa R, Mejus L. Verification of surface-groundwater connectivity in an irrigation canal using geophysical, water balance and stable isotope approaches. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(11): 2837–2853
Polomčić D, Hajdin B, Stevanović Z, Bajić D, Hajdin K. Groundwater management by riverbank filtration and an infiltration channel: The case of Obrenovac, Serbia. Hydrogeology Journal, 2013, 21(7): 1519–1530
Chang L C, Ho C C, Yeh M H, Yang C C. An integrating approach for conjunctive-use planning of surface and subsurface water system. Water Resources Management, 2011, 25(1): 59–78
Bobba A G, Cvetkovic V. Environmental Modelling of Hydrological Systems. Lund: Lund University, 1996
Appelo C A J, Postma D. Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution. Leiden: August Aimé Balkema, 2005
Bencala K E. Interactions of solutes and streambed sediment: 2. A dynamic analysis of coupled hydrologic and chemical processes that determine solute transport. Water Resources Research, 1984, 20(12): 1804–1814
Kollet S J, Maxwell R M. Integrated surface-groundwater flow modeling: a free-surface overland flow boundary condition in a parallel groundwater flow model. Advances in Water Resources, 2006, 29(7): 945–958
Safavi H R, Bahreini G R. Conjunctive simulation of surface water and groundwater resources under uncertainty. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transaction B, Engineering, 2009, 33(B1): 79–94
Bobba A G. Ground water-surface water interface (GWSWI) modeling: recent advances and future challenges. Water Resources Management, 2012, 26(14): 4105–4131
Scibek J, Allen D M, Cannon A J, Whitfield P H. Groundwater-surface water interaction under scenarios of climate change using a high-resolution transient groundwater model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 333(2–4): 165–181
Lubczynski M W, Gurwin J. Integration of various data sources for transient groundwater modeling with spatio-temporally variable fluxes-Sardon study case, Spain. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2005, 306(1–4): 71–96
Gedeon M, Wemaere I, Marivoet J. Regional groundwater model of north-east Belgium. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 335(1–4): 133–139
Cho J, Barone V A, Mostaghimi S. Simulation of land use impacts on groundwater levels and streamflow in a Virginia watershed. Agricultural Water Management, 2009, 96(1): 1–11
Almeida C N, Roehrig J, Wendland E. Development and integration of a groundwater simulation model to an open Geographic Information System. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2014, 50(1): 101–110
Kim N W, Chung I M, Won Y S, Arnold J G. Development and application of the integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2008, 356(1–2): 1–16
Arnold J G, Allen P M, Bernhardt G. A comprehensive surfacegroundwater flow model. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1993, 142(1–4): 47–69
Huang T, Pang Z. Changes in groundwater induced by water diversion in the Lower Tarim River, Xinjiang Uygur, NW China: Evidence from environmental isotopes and water chemistry. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010, 387(3–4): 188–201
Liu C, Zheng H. South-to-north water transfer schemes for China. International Journal ofWater Resources Development, 2002, 18(3): 453–471
Rohden C, Kreuzer A, Chen Z, Kipfer R, Aeschbach-Hertig W. Characterizing the recharge regime of the strongly exploited aquifers of the North China Plain by environmental tracers. Water Resources Research, 2010, 46(5): W05511
Wang G, Xia J, Chen J. Quantification of effects of climate variations and human activities on runoff by a monthly water balance model: a case study of the Chaobai River basin in northern China. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45(7): W00A11
Ambrose R B, Wool T A, Martin J L. The Water Quality Analysis Simulation Program, WASP5, Part A: Model documentation. Athens: US EPA Center for Exposure Assessment Modeling, 1993
Jia H, Wang S, Wei M, Zhang Y. Scenario analysis of water pollution control in the typical peri-urban river using a coupled hydrodynamic-water quality model. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2): 255–265
Jia H, Zhang Y, Guo Y. The development of a multi-species algal ecodynamic model for urban surface water systems and its application. Ecological Modelling, 2010, 221(15): 1831–1838
Park J Y, Park G A, Kim S J. Assessment of future climate change cmpact on cater cuality of Chungju Lake, South Korea, using WASP coupled with SWAT. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 2013, 49(6): 1225–1238
Jia H, Cheng S. Spatial and dynamic simulation for Miyun Reservoir waters in Beijing. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 46(11–12): 473–479
Harbaugh A W, Banta E R, Hill M C, McDonald M G. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular groundwater model: User guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. Reston: US Geological Survey, 2000
Zheng C. MT3D: A Modular Three-Dimensional Transport Model for Simulation of Advection, Dispersion and Chemical reactions of Contaminants in Groundwater Systems. Bethesda: SS Papadopulos & Associates, 1992
Uhlík J, Baier J. Model evaluation of thermal energy potential of hydrogeological structures with flooded mines. Mine Water and the Environment, 2012, 31(3): 179–191
Sun F, Shao H, Kalbacher T, Wang W, Yang Z, Huang Z, Kolditz O. Groundwater drawdown at Nakou site of Beijing Plain: model development and calibration. Environmental Earth Science, 2011, 64(5): 1323–1333
Wang S, Shao J, Song X, Zhang Y, Huo Z, Zhou X. Application of MODFLOW and Geographic Information System to groundwater flow simulation in North China Plain, China. Environmental Geology, 2008, 55(7): 1449–1462
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jia, H., Liang, S. & Zhang, Y. Assessing the impact on groundwater safety of inter-basin water transfer using a coupled modeling approach. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 9, 84–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0741-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0741-2