Abstract
As the leading urban agglomeration in China, the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) is experiencing a factor-driven to innovation-driven transition. However, the dynamics of regional innovation growth are not yet fully understood. This paper combines the complex network methodology with spatial econometrics to disentangle the contributions of innovation endowments, innovation network flows, and innovation network positions to regional innovation growth, as well as their spatial spillover effects. The primary findings suggest that regional innovation growth results from the networked agglomeration economies, which is shaped by the interactions between agglomeration factors and network factors. Specifically, agglomeration factors play a fundamental role in regional innovation growth. In contrast, network factors, such as the network flows and network positions, may contribute to new path creation by promoting access to external innovation resources. Additionally, the institutional factors show multiplexity in fostering regional innovation patterns. Such findings indicate that the YRD region should shift the innovation growth pattern from competitive involution to mutually beneficial cooperation to reduce regional disparities. In this regard, the institutional capacity of organizing network flows and fostering reciprocal inter-city partnerships has become increasingly critical for promoting sustainable innovation and regional development.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anselin, L, Rey S, 1991. Properties of tests for spatial dependence in linear regression models. Geographical Analysis, 23(2): 112–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1991.tb00228.x
Bavelas A, 1950. Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22(6): 725–730. doi: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1906679
Brandes U, 2001. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2): 163–177. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250x.2001.9990249
Burt R S, 2003. The social structure of competition. In Cross R (eds.). Networks in the Knowledge Economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 57–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195159509.001.0001
Burt R S, Burzynska K, 2017. Chinese entrepreneurs, social networks, and guanxi. Management and Organization Review, 13(2): 221–260. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2017.6
Coe N M, Yeung H W C, 2015. Global Production Networks: Theorizing Economic Development in an Interconnected World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198703907.001.0001
Capello R, 2000. The city network paradigm: measuring urban network externalities. Urban Studies, 37(11): 1925–1945. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/713707232
Castells M, 1996. The space of flows. In Castells M. The Rise of the Network Society, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 1: 376–482. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514.ch6
Derudder Ben, Taylor Peter James, Hoyler Michael et al., 2013. Measurement and interpretation of connectivity of Chinese cities in world city network, 2010. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(3): 261–273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-013-0604-y
Derudder B, Taylor P J, 2019. Multiple geographies of global urban connectivity as measured in the interlocking network model. In Schwanen T and Van Kempen R. (eds.). Handbook of Urban Geography. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. 77–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785364600
Friedkin N E, 1991. Theoretical foundations for centrality measures. American Journal of Sociology, 96(6): 1478–1504. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/229694
Ha J, Howitt P, 2007. Accounting for trends in productivity and R&D: a Schumpeterian critique of semi-endogenous growth theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(4): 733–774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00045.x
Hesse M, 2016. On borrowed size, flawed urbanisation and emerging enclave spaces: the exceptional urbanism of Luxembourg, Luxembourg. European Urban and Regional Studies, 23(4): 612–627. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776414528723
Huggins R, Johnston A, 2010. Knowledge flow and inter-firm networks: the influence of network resources, spatial proximity and firm size. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 22(5): 457–484. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903171350
Huggins R, Thompson P, 2014. A network-based view of regional growth. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(3): 511–545. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt012
Huggins R, Thompson P, 2017. Networks and regional economic growth: a spatial analysis of knowledge ties. Environment and Planning A:Economy and Space, 49(6): 1247–1265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X17692327
Huggins R, Prokop D, Thompson P, 2020. Universities and open innovation: the determinants of network centrality. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(3): 718–757. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-019-09720-5
Ke S, 2010. Agglomeration, productivity, and spatial spillovers across Chinese cities. The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1): 157–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0285-0
Kleinberg J M, 1999. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM (JACM), 46(5): 604–632. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/324133.324140
LeSage J P, 2014. Spatial econometric panel data model specification: a Bayesian approach. Spatial Statistics, 9(9): 122–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2014.02.002
Li D, Wei Y D, Wang T, 2015. Spatial and temporal evolution of urban innovation network in China. Habitat International, 49(49): 484–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.05.031
Li X, Hui E C, Lang W et al., 2020. Transition from factor-driven to innovation-driven urbanization in China: a study of manufacturing industry automation in Dongguan City. China Economic Review, 59: 101382. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101382
Liefner I, Hennemann S, 2011. Structural holes and new dimensions of distance: the spatial configuration of the scientific knowledge network of China’s optical technology sector. Environment and Planning A, 2011, 43(4): 810–829. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/a43100
Liefner I, Losacker S, 2020. Low-cost innovation and technology-driven innovation in China’s machinery industry. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32(3): 319–331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1656333
Losacker S, Liefner I, 2020. Implications of China’s innovation policy shift: ‘Does indigenous’ mean closed? Growth and Change, 51(3): 1124–1141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12400
Lu J, Sun D, Yu J et al., 2020. ‘Local versus nonlocal’ enterprise linkages of global cities: a comparison between Beijing and Shanghai, China. Complexity, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/0220/8918534
Luo X, Shen J, 2009. A study on inter-city cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Habitat International, 33(1): 52–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2008.04.002
Meijers E J, Romein A, 2003. Realizing potential: building regional organizing capacity in polycentric urban regions. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2): 173–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776403010002005
Meijers E J, Burger M J, Hoogerbrugge M M, 2016. Borrowing size in networks of cities: city size, network connectivity and metropolitan functions in Europe. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1): 181–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12181
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China City Statistical Yearbooks. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2009–2019. (in Chinese)
Inkpen A C, Tsang E W, 2005. Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1): 146–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.15281445
Sabidussi G, 1966. The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4): 581–603. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527
Shi S, Wall R, Pain K, 2019. Exploring the significance of domestic investment for foreign direct investment in China: a citynetwork approach. Urban Studies, 56(12): 2447–2464. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018795977
Shi S, Pain K, 2020. Investigating China’s mid-yangtze river economic growth region using a spatial network growth model. Urban Studies, 57(14): 2973–2993. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019894232
Shi S, Wong S K, Zheng C, 2021. Network capital and urban development: an inter-urban capital flow network analysis. Regional Studies, 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2021.1955098
Storper M, Venables A J, 2004. Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4): 351–370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
Taylor P, Derudder B, Hoyler M et al., 2014. City-dyad analyses of China’s integration into the world city network. Urban Studies, 51(5): 868–882. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013494419
Tervo H, 2010. Cities, hinterlands and agglomeration shadows: spatial developments in Finland during 1880–2004. Elplorations in Economic History, 47(4): 476–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2010.05.002
Tian L, Wang H H, Chen Y, 2010. Spatial externalities in China regional economic growth. China Economic Review, 21: S20–S31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2010.05.006
Van Oort F, Burger M, Raspe O, 2010. On the economic foundation of the urban network paradigm: spatial integration, functional integration and urban complementarities within the Dutch Randstad. Urban Studies, 47(4): 725–748. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009352362
Van Meeteren M, Neal Z, Derudder B, 2016. Disentangling agglomeration and network externalities: a conceptual typology. Papers in Regional Science, 95(1): 61–80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12214
Wen Y, 2014. The spillover effect of FDI and its impact on productivity in high economic output regions: a comparative analysis of the Yangtze River Delta and the Pearl River Delta, China. Papers in Regional Science, 93(2): 341–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12086
Ying L G, 2003. Understanding China’s recent growth experience: a spatial econometric perspective. The Annals of Regional Science, 37(4): 613–628. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-003-0129-x
Zhang J, Peck J, 2016. Variegated capitalism, Chinese style: regional models, multi-scalar constructions. Regional Studies, 50(1): 52–78. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.856514
Zhang X, Kloosterman R C, 2016. Connecting the ‘workshop of the world’: intra- and extraservice networks of the Pearl River Delta cityregion. Regional Studies, 50(6): 1069–1081. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.962492
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 52078245)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Zhang, J. Exploring Regional Innovation Growth Through A Network Approach: A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta Region, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 32, 16–30 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-022-1256-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-022-1256-6