Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
A 34-year-old man without systemic disease visited our emergency department with presentation of epigastric pain for 2 days. The pain was constant, dull and did not radiate. He was afebrile on arrival. Physical examination showed epigastric tenderness and rebounding tenderness. Laboratory examination showed a white blood cell count of 17,900/μL and C-reactive protein level of 39.1 mg/dL (normal range: < 5 mg/dL). Radiograph of the abdomen showed local central bowel ileus formation (Fig. 1a). Subsequent computed tomography (CT) was arranged and showed a linear hyperattenuating 2.8-cm-in-length foreign body in the small intestine of right upper quadrant, penetrating the bowel wall with fat stranding in surrounding tissues (Fig. 1b). There was no evidence of pneumoperitoneum on images. The patient underwent laparoscopic exploration presenting foreign body which penetrated the small intestine (Fig. 1c). A fish bone was removed smoothly and closure small bowel perforation was done (Fig. 1d) and was discharged uneventfully 5 days later. An intraoperative diagnosis of fish bone impaction with small bowel perforation was made.
Unintentional ingestion of a fish bone is common in the emergency department. Fortunately, most of these fish bones disposed through the stool without causing any serious complications. Less than 1% of the ingested foreign bodies may cause perforation [1]. The terminal ileum is the most common site of perforation, followed by the duodenal C-loop [2]. CT scan is the effective modality for the diagnosis of foreign bodies and detect perforation [3]. Acute intestinal perforation secondary to foreign body ingestion is an emergency requiring surgical intervention [4].
References
Mosca S, Manes G, Martino R, Amitrano L, Bottino V, Bove A, Camera A, De Nucci C, Di Costanzo G, Guardascione M, Lampasi F, Picascia S, Picciotto FP, Riccio E, Rocco VP, Uomo G, Balzano A (2001) Endoscopic management of foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract: report on a series of 414 adult patients. Endoscopy 33(8):692–696. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2001-16212
Goh BK, Chow PK, Quah HM, Ong HS, Eu KW, Ooi LL, Wong WK (2006) Perforation of the gastrointestinal tract secondary to ingestion of foreign bodies. World J Surg 30(3):372–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0490-2
Coulier B, Tancredi MH, Ramboux A (2004) Spiral CT and multidetector-row CT diagnosis of perforation of the small intestine caused by ingested foreign bodies. EurRadiol 14(10):1918–1925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2430-1
Schwartz GF, Polsky HS (1976) Ingested foreign bodies of the gastrointestinal tract. Am Surg 42(4):236–238
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
The manuscript does not contain clinical studies or identifying patient data.
Statement of human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Informed consent
Given the absence of identifying patient data, informed consent was deferred.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, CW., Chiu, YW. Unintentional fish bone ingestion causing perforation of small intestine. Intern Emerg Med 16, 1371–1372 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02519-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-020-02519-5