Abstract
Background
This study assessed the prevalence and risk factors for food addiction (FA) in bariatric surgery candidates.
Methods
We assessed BMI, FA (Yale Food Addiction Scale), quality of life (Quality Of Life, Obesity and Dietetics), depression (Beck Depression Inventory), and binge eating (Binge Eating Scale) in 188 obese patients.
Results
The most prevalent addiction criteria were persistent desire to control food consumption (93.1 %), continuing to eat certain foods despite problems (40.4 %), and tolerance (38.8 %); current prevalence of FA was 16.5 %. Patients with (vs. without) FA were more often single and had lower physical, psycho-social, and sexual quality of life and higher depression and binge eating.
Conclusions
Systematic screening for and treatment of FA symptoms before obesity surgery is critical because FA symptoms are prevalent and associated with poorer psychosocial outcome.
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Bariatric surgery is an efficient treatment for severe obesity, associated with long-term weight loss and improvement in comorbidities and quality of life (QoL) [1, 2]. Due to variations in postoperative outcomes [2], current research aims to determine, screen for, and treat the factors associated with poor postoperative outcomes. Pre- and postoperative eating disorders and problematic eating behavior are important factors affecting postoperative QoL, comorbidities, and sometimes weight loss [2]. To date, studies of eating behavior in bariatric surgery patients have focused on binge eating disorder (BED), the most prevalent form of eating disorder in obese patients, affecting from 5 to 50 % of bariatric surgery candidates [2, 3]. BED is characterized by recurrent binge eating (i.e., consumption of unusually large amounts of food during a discrete period of time, while experiencing a sense of loss of control) without compensatory weight control behaviors [4]
To identify specific aspects of food addiction in patients exhibiting significant distress in relation to food, Gearhardt et al. adapted the DSM diagnostic criteria for substance dependence to addiction to certain foods, particularly highly processed foods high in added sugar, fat, and salt [4]. Food addiction describes the behavior of the subpopulation of patients who show substance dependence symptoms in their eating behavior (i.e., diminished control over food consumption; consumption despite adverse physical or psychological consequences; persistent desire or unsuccessful efforts to cut down or control food use; eating in larger amount or over a longer period than intended; giving up important occupational or recreational activities because of food consumption; tolerance; withdrawal; significant distress in relation to food) [5]. This definition is complementary to BED, making it possible to screen patients who experience significant distress in relation to food or loss of control over their eating behavior but do not meet the diagnostic criteria for BED (i.e., consumption of small or moderate amounts of food throughout the day; consumption of food over a long period of time; continuation of eating behavior despite physical or psychological problems). There is growing evidence for the clinical validity and utility of the concept of food addiction in obese patients: food addiction is highly prevalent in obese patients [6] and sometimes associated with poorer weight loss [7]. However, few studies have focused on bariatric surgery candidates, and there is a lack of studies examining the biological and psychological characteristics of food addiction in this population [6].
This study aimed to assess the prevalence of food addiction in bariatric surgery candidates and to determine their biological (age, gender, BMI, duration and age of onset of obesity) and psychological (i.e., QoL, depression, binge eating) characteristics. We hypothesized that food addiction would be more prevalent in bariatric surgery candidates than in the overall population and associated with poor psychosocial outcome (i.e., low QoL and high levels of depression and binge eating).
Materials and Methods
Participants and Procedure
This cross-sectional study included all consecutive bariatric surgery candidates seen in the Nutrition Department of the University Hospital of Tours (France) and referred for preoperative psychiatric assessment between July 2013 and November 2015. Out of the initial population (n = 204), 16 were excluded (10 did not understand the questionnaires and 6 gave incomplete data), leading to a final sample of 188 patients. Patients answered the questionnaires shortly before the systematic preoperative psychiatric consultation.
Measures
We collected data on demographics (age, gender, marital status), current body mass index (BMI), previous maximal BMI, and age of onset and duration of obesity.
We diagnosed current food addiction using the French version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale [8, 9] that assesses the seven diagnostic criteria for food addiction based on the DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria for substance dependence as well as significant distress in relation to food. Food addiction was diagnosed when at least three of the seven symptoms were present during the previous 12 months and clinically significant impairment or distress was confirmed [5].
We assessed physical, psycho-social, and sexual QoL using the “Quality Of Life, Obesity and Dietetics” (QOLOD) rating scale [10], which is a French tool derived from the “Impact of Weight on Quality Of Life Questionnaire,” the first instrument specifically designed to assess QoL in obesity.
We assessed depression using the shortened Beck Depression Inventory, a widely used 13-item self-rating scale (cutoff ≥16) [11] used in bariatric surgery populations.
We assessed binge eating symptoms using the Binge Eating Scale, a 16-item self-report scale (cut off ≥18), which is a reliable screening tool for BED in obese patients [12].
Statistical Analyses
Analyses were conducted using SPSS version 22 (IBM Corp. Released 2013. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). We used mean comparison tests (Mann-Whitney U test or Student’s test based on the assumption of normality of the variables) and chi-squared tests (we checked that theoretical frequencies were higher or equal to 5 for each cell and for each analysis) to compare patients with and without food addiction.
Results
Descriptive data (Table 1)
Table 1 presents the characteristics of the overall population, including patients with and without food addiction. Mean age was 40.8 ± 12.6 years; 84 % were female. Prevalence of current food addiction was 16.5 % (significantly higher than the 8.7 % prevalence observed in the French overall population [9]; p < 0.001). In our sample, the most prevalent food addiction symptoms were, by order of importance: persistent desire to control consumption of certain foods (93.1 %); continuing to eat certain foods despite physical or psychological problems (40.4 %); tolerance (38.8 %); considerable time spent to obtain, use, or recover from the effects of certain foods (25 %); significant distress in relation to these foods (22.9 %); use of food in larger quantities or over longer periods than intended (18.6 %); withdrawal (14.4 %); and giving up important activities because of food (13.3 %).
Comparison of Patients With and Without Food Addiction (Table 1)
Patients with food addiction were more frequently single than those without, but there was no difference in terms of age, gender, current BMI, previous maximal BMI, duration of obesity, or age of onset of obesity.
Patients with food addiction reported lower physical, psycho-social and sexual QoL and higher prevalence and levels of depression and binge eating than those without addiction. Thirty-six percent of the patients with food addiction had no significant binge eating.
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that food addiction is very prevalent among bariatric surgery candidates (16.5 %) and higher than in the overall population (8.7 %), with a high prevalence rate for each food addiction criterion (especially “persistent desire to control consumption of certain foods,” “continuing to eat certain foods despite physical or psychological problems,” and “tolerance”). Patients with food addiction experienced lower QoL and higher levels of depression and binge eating.
In view of the low QoL and the high comorbidity with psychiatric disorders in patients with food addiction, better screening and treatment of this condition are crucial during the preoperative period, as persistence of addiction could partly explain the persistence of psychiatric disorders. Given that it is generally easier to report one’s addiction symptoms than one’s psychiatric symptoms (i.e., psychiatric disorders are more stigmatized than addictions), screening for food addiction could also help identify this high-risk subpopulation (i.e., greater psychopathology and lower QoL).
We confirmed that binge eating and food addiction are distinct constructs (36 % of patients with food addiction had no significant binge eating), demonstrating that the simultaneous assessment of BED and food addiction could improve our ability to identify patients who exhibit problematic eating behavior, compared to considering BED alone.
Finally, given that addictions share some specific risk factors, patients with food addiction may have a higher risk of switching to another addiction after surgery if not treated (we assume that this might explain the postoperative increase in alcohol addiction).
Our study’s limitations include the small sample size, the cross-sectional design, and the use of self-administered scales. Although we demonstrated that food addiction was associated with poorer preoperative psychosocial outcome in bariatric surgery candidates, future studies should determine its association with postoperative outcomes (could pre- or postoperative food addiction be a risk factor for lower weight loss, lower QoL, and/or higher prevalence of postoperative comorbidities?).
Food addiction is a concept that might be of importance in bariatric surgery patients because of its prevalence and because of its potential association with long-term postoperative outcome. If confirmed, it would lead to novel management and treatment strategies that might improve postoperative outcome.
References
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, et al. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004;292(14):1724–37.
van Hout G, van Heck G. Bariatric psychology, psychological aspects of weight loss surgery. Obes Facts. 2009;2(1):10–5.
Niego SH, Kofman MD, Weiss JJ, et al. Binge eating in the bariatric surgery population: a review of the literature. Int J Eat Disord. 2007;40(4):349–59.
American Psychiatric Association. diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD. Food addiction: an examination of the diagnostic criteria for dependence. J Addict Med. 2009;3(1):1–7.
Meule A, Gearhardt AN. Five years of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: taking stock and moving forward. Curr Addict Rep. 2014;1(3):193–205.
Burmeister JM, Hinman N, Koball A, et al. Food addiction in adults seeking weight loss treatment. Implications for psychosocial health and weight loss. Appetite. 2013;60(1):103–10.
Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD. Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale. Appetite. 2009;52(2):430–6.
Brunault P, Ballon N, Gaillard P, et al. Validation of the French version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale: an examination of its factor structure, reliability, and construct validity in a nonclinical sample. Can J Psychiatry. 2014;59(5):276–84.
Ziegler O, Filipecki J, Girod I, et al. Development and validation of a French obesity-specific quality of life questionnaire: Quality of Life, Obesity and Dietetics (QOLOD) rating scale. Diabetes Metab. 2005;31(3):273–83.
Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8(1):77–100.
Gormally J, Black S, Daston S, et al. The assessment of binge eating severity among obese persons. Addict Behav. 1982;7(1):47–55.
Acknowledgments
Grant Information
This study was conducted without specific funding.
We thank Elizabeth Yates for correcting the English version of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest Statement
Dr. Brunault reports personal fees and non-financial support from Lundbeck, personal fees from AstraZeneca, and personal fees from DNA Pharma, outside the submitted work. Pr. Ballon reports personal fees from Lundbeck, personal fees from AstraZeneca, and personal fees from DNA Pharma, outside the submitted work. Pr. Ducluzeau, Dr. Bourbao-Tournois, Dr. Delbachian, Pr. Couet, and Pr. Réveillère have nothing to disclose.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brunault, P., Ducluzeau, PH., Bourbao-Tournois, C. et al. Food Addiction in Bariatric Surgery Candidates: Prevalence and Risk Factors. OBES SURG 26, 1650–1653 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2189-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2189-x