Background
Rodents have been used to examine physiologic changes after bariatric surgery, but differences in gastric/vagal anatomy may limit their utility. Swine may be a more appropriate animal model because of anatomic and physiologic similarities to humans.The aim of this study was to establish a survival model of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in swine and to evaluate its potential in studies of physiology.
Methods
13 miniature swine, 5 Yucatan [26.4 ±1.6 kg], 4 Hanford [28.3 ±0.6 kg] and 4 other breed [54.9 ±6.2 kg] underwent open RYGBP, and were kept alive to 30 (n=4), 60 (n=1) or 90 (n=2) postoperative days.
Results
4 early animals had staple-line leakage within 7 days from surgery and 1 animal experienced unmanageable pain at 42 days after surgery. One animal experienced immediate cardiopulmonary collapse. 58% of animals survived to their projected endpoint. Necropsy of 1 animal at its 90-day endpoint revealed a gastro-gastric fistula. Anatomic features in swine that differ from humans, such as thick perigastric membranes, required adjustment to the standard RYGBP technique used in humans to achieve satisfactory results. Caloric intake decreased in some but not all animals, and was linked to feeding regimen. By postoperative day 30, animals weighed 5.7–29.1% less than their projected, non-operative weight. Serum assays of ghrelin and PYY were conducted, with results consistent with the procedure.
Conclusions
The use of swine as a model for bariatric surgery has promise, but also has associated pitfalls that must be addressed for this to be an effective model.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cummings DE, Schwartz MW. Genetics and pathophysiology of human obesity. Annu Rev Med 2003; 54: 453–71.
Schwartz MW, Woods SC, Porte DJ et al. Central nervous system control of food intake. Nature 2000; 404: 661–71.
Leibel RL, Rosenbaum M, Hirsch J. Changes in energy expenditure resulting from altered body weight. N Engl J Med 1995; 332: 621–8.
Rubino F, Gagner M, Gentileschi P et al. The early effect of the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on hormones involved in body weight regulation and glucose metabolism. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 236–42.
Del Castillo D, Pereferrer FS, Hernandez G et al. The evolution of experimental surgery in the field of morbid obesity. Obes Surg 2004; 14: 1263–72.
Suzuki S, Ramos EJB, Goncalves GG et al. Changes in GI hormones and their effect on gastric emptying and transit times after roux-en-y gastric bypass in a rat model. Surgery 2005; 138: 283–90.
Roux Cl, Aylwin S, Batterham R et al. Gut hormone profiles following bariatric surgery favor an anorectic state, facilitate weight loss, and improve metabolic parameters. Ann Surg 2006; 243: 108–14.
Cefalu W. Animal models of type 2 diabetes: Clinical presentation and pathophyisological relevance to the human condition. ILAR 2006; 47: 186–98.
Salfen BE, Carroll JA, Keisler DH. Endocrine responses to short-term feed deprivation in weaning pigs. J Endocrinol 2003; 178: 541–51.
Sheikh SP, Holst JJ, Orskov C et al. Release of PYY from pig intestinal mucosa; luminal and neural regulation. Regul Pept 1989; 26: 253–66.
Swindle MM, Smith AC, Laber K et al. Biology and Medicine of Swine. In: Suckow MA, Reuter JD, eds. Laboratory Animal Medicine and Management, Laboratory Animal Medicine and Management. Ithaca, NY: International Veterinary Information Service 2003.
Beaver BV, Reed W, Leary S et al. 2000 report of the AVMA panel on euthanasia. JAVMA 2001; 218: 669–96.
Swindle MM. Chronic Intravascular Catherization in swine: General Principles, in Catheterization Series. Sinclair Research Center, Inc.: Columbia, MO, 2004.
Dyson MC, Alloosh M, Vuchetich JP et al. Components of metabolic syndrome and coronary artery disease in female ossabaw swine fed excess atherogenic diet. Comp Med 2006; 56: 37–47.
Nocca D, Gagner M, Abente FC et al. Laparoscopic gastric bypass with silicone band in a pig model: Prevention of anastomotic dilatation — feasibility study. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 523–7.
Waage A, Gagner M, Biertho L et al. Comparisons between open hand-sewn, laparoscopic stapled and laparoscopic computer-mediated, circular stapled gastro-jejunostomies in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in the porcine model. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 782–7.
Arnold W, Shikora S. A comparison of burst pressure between buttressed versus non-buttressed staple-lines in an animal model. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 164–71.
Scott D, Provost D, Tesfay S et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass using the porcine model. Obes Surg 2001; 11: 46–53.
Potvin M, Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic Rouxen-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: A feasibility study in pigs. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1997; 7: 294–7.
Kim WW, Gagner M, Biertho L et al. Taking posterior rectus sheath laparoscopically to reinforce the gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 2003; 13: 258–62.
Gentileschi P, Gagner M, Milone L et al. Histologic studies of the bypassed stomach after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in a porcine model. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 886–90.
Marx WH, Halverson JD. Laparoscopic anterior gastroplasty. Surg Endosc 1998; 12: 1442–4.
Nocca D, Gagner M, Aggarwal R et al. Is collagen a good banding material for outlet control of vertical gastroplasty? Preliminary study in pigs. Obes Surg 2006; 16: 39–44.
Wickremesekera K, Miller G, Naotunne TS et al. Loss of insulin resistance after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery: A time course study. Obes Surg 2005; 15: 474–81.
Rubino F, Forgione A, Cummings D et al. The mechanism of diabetes control after gastrointestinal bypass surgery reveals a role of the proximal small intestine in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Ann Surg 2006; 24: 741–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Flum, D.R., Devlin, A., Wright, A.S. et al. Development of a Porcine Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Survival Model for the Study of Post-Surgical Physiology. OBES SURG 17, 1332–1339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9237-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9237-5