Abstract
A study was conducted to assess carbon stocks in various forms and land-use types and reliably estimate the impact of land use on C stocks in the Nam Yao sub-watershed (19°05′10″N, 100°37′02″E), Thailand. The carbon stocks of aboveground, soil organic and fine root within primary forest, reforestation and agricultural land were estimated through field data collection. Results revealed that the amount of total carbon stock of forests (357.62 ± 28.51 Mg·ha−1, simplified expression of Mg (carbon)·ha−1) was significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the reforestation (195.25 ± 14.38 Mg·ha−1) and the agricultural land (103.10 ± 18.24 Mg·ha−1). Soil organic carbon in the forests (196.24 ± 22.81 Mg·ha−1) was also significantly greater (P< 0.05) than the reforestation (146.83 ± 7.22 Mg·ha−1) and the agricultural land (95.09 ± 14.18 Mg·ha−1). The differences in carbon stocks across land-use types are the primary consequence of variations in the vegetation biomass and the soil organic matter. Fine root carbon was a small fraction of carbon stocks in all land-use types. Most of the soil organic carbon and fine root carbon content was found in the upper 40-cm layer and decreased with soil depth. The aboveground carbon:soil organic carbon: fine root carbon ratios (ABGC: SOC: FRC), was 5:8:1, 2:8:1, and 3:50:1 for the forest, reforestation and agricultural land, respectively. These results indicate that a relatively large proportion of the C loss is due to forest conversion to agricultural land. However, the C can be effectively recaptured through reforestation where high levels of C are stored in biomass as carbon sinks, facilitating carbon dioxide mitigation.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Blake GR, Hartge KH. 1986. Bulk density, In: A. Klute, (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, Part I. Physical and mineralogical methods. Agronomy Monograph no. 9 ( 2nd ed.). American Society Agronomy Crop Science, Society of America, Madison, pp. 363–375.
Bonino EE. 2006. Changes in carbon pools associated with a land-use gradient in Dry Chaco, Argentina. Forest Ecology and Management, 223: 183–189.
Brown S, Lugo AE. 1984. Biomass of tropical forests: A new estimate based on forest volumes. Science, 223: 1290–1293.
Canadel JG. 2002. Land use effects on terrestrial carbon sources and sinks. Science in China (series C), 45: 1–9.
Chowdhury MSH, Biswas S, Halim MA, Haque SMS, Muhammed N, Koike M. 2007. Comparative analysis of some selected macronutrients of soil in orange orchard and degraded forests in Chittagong Hill Tracts, Bangladesh. Journal of Forestry Research, 18(1): 27–30.
Evrendilek F, Celik I, Kilic S. 2004. Changes in soil organic carbon and other physical soil properties along adjacent Mediteranean forest, grassland, and cropland ecosystems in Turkey. Journal of Arid Environments, 59: 743–752.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2001. Global forest resources assessment 2000: Main report. FAO Forestry Paper No. 140. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the Uniteds Nation (FAO). 2003. The state of the world’s forest. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Gajaseni N. 2000. An alternative approach to biodiversity evaluation: Case study in the lower Mekong Basin. PhD. Dissertation. University of Edinburgh, U.K, pp. 187.
Hairiah K, Sitompul SM, van Noordwijk M, Palm C. 2001. Carbon stocks of tropical land use systems as part of the global C balance: Effects of forest conversion and options for clean developments’ activities. International centre for research in agroforestry, Bogor. pp. 49.
Hesse PR. 1971. Carbon and organic matter. In: P.R. Hesse (Ed.), Soil chemical analysis. John Murray Ltd., London, pp. 204–254.
Impacts Center for Southeast Asia (IC-SEA). 2000. Land-use change and terrestrial carbon stocks: Capacity building, impact assessment, and policy support in Southeast Asia. APN Final Report, prepared by Global Change Impacts centre for Southeast Asia, pp. 73.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2000. Land use, land-use change, and forestry. In: R.T. Watson, I.R. Noble, B. Bolin, et al. (eds.), A special report of IPCC. Cambridge University Press, UK. 375 pp.
Iverson LR, Brown S, Grainger A, Prasad A, Liu D. 1993. Carbon sequestration in tropical Asia: An assessment of technically suitable forestlands using geographic information system analysis. Climate Research, 3: 23–38.
Janssens IA, Sampson DA, Cermak J, Meiresonne L, Riguzzi F, Overloop S, Geulemans R. 1999. Aboveground and belowground phytomass and carbon storage in a Belgian Scots pine stand. Annuals of Forest Science, 56: 81–90.
Jampanin S, Gajaseni N. 2004. Assessment of carbon sequestration, litter production and litter decomposition in Kaeng Krachan national park. In: Climate change in forestry sector meeting: Forest and climate change. Bangkok, Thailand. August 16–17, 2004: 1–14 (in Thai with English ab stract).
Kamo K. 1999. The after care program for the research and training re-afforestation project. A report of JICA short term research cooperation ecological and silvicicultural study on man-made and nature forests for developing sustainable forestry in Sakaerat, Thailand (2). Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Japan, pp.12–17.
Kutintara U, Marod D, Takahashi M, Nakashizuka T. 1995. Growth and dynamics of bamboos in a tropical seasonal forest. In: Proceeding of the international workshop on “the changes of tropical forest ecosystems by El Nino and others”. Japan Science and Technology Agency National Research Council of Thailand-Japan International Science and Technology Exchange Center, Bangkok, pp.125–139.
Lasco RD. 2002. Forest carbon budgets in Southeast Asia following harvesting and land cover change. Science in China (Series C), 45: 55–64.
Levine JS. 1995. Biomass burning, a driver for global change. Environment Science Technology, 120: 120–125.
Lugo AE, Brown S. 1992. Tropical forests as sinks of atmospheric carbon. Forest Ecology and Management, 54: 239–255.
Mendoza-Vega J, Karltun E, Olsson M. 2003. Estimations of amounts of soil organic carbon and fine root carbon in land use and land cover classes, and soiltypes of Chiapas highlands, Mexico. Forest Ecology and Management, 177: 191–206.
Montagnini F, Porras C. 1998. Evaluating the role of plantations as carbon sinks: An example of integrative approach from the humid tropics. Environmental Management, 22: 459–470.
National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation Department. 2005. Thailand’s forest information. Ministry of natural resource and environment, Bangkok (in Thai).
Obara H, Nakai M, Kato K, Hamazaki T, Chandrachai W, Patinavin S, Sukchan S. 2000. The change of soils after deforestation in Thailand: chemical degradation of crop field soil. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on the response of tropical forest ecosystem to long term cyclic climate changes, Kanchanaburi, Thailand, pp. 100–104.
Office of Environmental Policy and Planning (OEPP). 2000. Thailand’s national greenhouse gas inventory 1994. Ministry of Science, Technology and Environment, Bangkok, 100 pp.
Ogawa H, Yoda K, Ogino K, Kira, T. 1965. Comparative ecological studies on three main types of forest vegetation in Thailand II. Plant biomass. Nature and Life in Southeast Asia, 4: 49–80.
Prévost M. 2004. Predicting soil properties from organic matter content following mechanical site preparation of forest soils. Journal of Soil Science Society America, 68: 943–949.
Post WM, Kwon WM. 2000. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change: processes and potential. Global Change Biology, 6: 317–327.
Power JS, Read JM, Denslow JS, Guzmans SM. 2004. Estimating soil carbon fluxes following land-cover change: A test of some critical assumptions for a region in Costa Rica. Global Change Biology, 10: 170–181.
Richter DD, Markewitz D, Trumbore SE, and Wells CC. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature, 400: 56–58.
Royal Forest Department. 1998. Upper Nan Watershed Management Project: Implementation plan. Bangkok, Thailand, 112 pp.
Sanchez JE, Paul EA, Wilson TC, Smeenk J, Harwood RR. 2002. Corn root effects on the nitrogen supplying capacity of a conditioned soil. Agronomy Journal, 94: 391–396.
Sangtongpraow S, Sukwong S. 1990. Economic assessment of forest resources in the SERS. Forest Research Bulletin, 76: 1–2.
Schmid I, Kazda M. 2002. Root distribution of Norway spruce in monospecific and mixed stands on different soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 159: 37–47.
Sheldrick BH, Wang C. 1993. Particle size determination. In M.R. Carter (ed.), Soil sampling and methods of analysis. Lewis Publishers, Bocarton. pp. 499–511.
Silver WL, Kueppers LM, Lugo AE, Ostertag R, Matzek V. 2004. Carbon sequestration and plant community dynamics following reforestation of tropical pasture. Ecological Applications, 14(4): 1115–1127.
Silver WL, Ostertag R, Lugo AE. 2000. The potential for tropical forest restoration and reforestation for carbon accumulation and offset. Restoration Ecology, 8: 394–407.
Sonja AH, Brandt CC, Jardine PM. 2005. Using soil physical and chemical properties to estimate bulk density. Soil Science Society of America, 69: 51–56.
Sperow M, Eve M, Paustian K. 2003. Potential soil C sequestration on U.S. agricultural soils. Climatic Change, 57: 319–339.
Sritulanont C, Puthawong M, Raissoongnern S. 1983. A study of biomass production of 10 years old Gmelina arborea (Roxb) plantation. Department of Forestry, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Bangkok (in Thai).
Suwannapinunt, W. 1983. A study on the biomass of Thyrsostachys siamensis Gamble forest at Hin-Lap, Kanchanaburi. Journal of Bamboo Research, 2(2): 82–101.
Tanee S. 1997. Nutrient cycle in dry evergreen and mixed deciduous forest in Kow Ang-runi wildlife national reserve, Chachengchow province. Master degree Thesis. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 106. (in Thai with English abstract).
Terakunpisut J. 2003. Carbon sequestration potential in aboveground biomass of Thong Pha Phum forest ecosystem. Master degree Thesis. Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. pp. 62.
Trumbore S, Costa ES, Nepstad DC, et al. 2006. Dynamics of fine root carbon in Amazonian tropical ecosystems and the contribution of roots to soil respiration. Global Change Biology, 12: 217–229.
Tsutsumi T, Yoda K, Sahunalu P, Hanmanonda D, Prachaiyo B. 1983. Forest: felling, burning and regeneration. In: K. Kyuma and C. Pairintra, (eds.), Shifting cultivation, pp. 13–62.
Ussiri DAN, Lal R, Jacinthe PA. 2006. Soil properties and carbon sequestration of afforested pasture in reclaimed minesoils of Ohio. Soil Science Society of America, 70: 1797–1806.
Viriyabuncha C, Chittachumnonk P, Sutthisrisinn C, Peawsa-ad K. 1987. Adjusting equation to estimate the aboveground biomass of Teak plantation in Thailand. In: Proccedings of the 7 th sivicultural seminar. Bangkok, Thailand. pp.239–260 (in Thai with English abstract).
Viriyabuncha C, Chittachumnonk P, Sutthisrisinn C, Samran S, Peawsa-ad K. 2001. Adjusting equation to estimate the above-ground biomass of Teak plantation in Thailand. In: Proceedings of the 7 th sivilcultural seminar. Kasetsart University, Thailand. December 12–14, 2001: 239–260 (in Thai with English abstract).
Viriyabuncha C, Vacharangkure T, Doangsrisen B. 2002. The evuation system for carbon storage in forest ecosystem in Thailand (I. aboveground biomass). Bangkok: Sivilculture Research Division, Royal Forest Department (in Thai with English abstract).
Walkley A, Black A. 1934. An examination of the Degiareff method for determing soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromicacid titration method. Soil Science, 37: 29–28.
Walker SM, Desanker PV. 2004. The impact of land use on soil caron in Miombo woodlands of Malawi. Forest Ecology and Management, 203: 345–360
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pibumrung, P., Gajaseni, N. & Popan, A. Profiles of carbon stocks in forest, reforestation and agricultural land, Northern Thailand. Journal of Forestry Research 19, 11–18 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-008-0002-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-008-0002-y