Abstract
Lasers have been used to improve the ultimate performance of thermal spray coatings for specific applications, but the full potential of additional laser treatments must be further explored. Laser treatments (auxiliary processes) can be applied before, during or after thermal spraying (main process), leading to a wide range of coating improvements (microstructure, adhesion, etc.). The aim of this review is to introduce the most significant laser treatments for thermal spray applications. The potential improvements for thermal spray coatings are illustrated by a selection of representative research cases. Laser pretreatments (ablation and texturing) promote coating/substrate adhesion and are suitable to prepare the surface of sensitive substrates such as aluminum, titanium, or magnesium alloys. The use of these techniques, which leads to several benefits such as surfaces free of grit-particle inclusions, directly improves the quality of coatings. Laser treatments applied simultaneously during the spraying process deeply modify the coatings microstructure. These hybrid technologies allow in situ laser melting of coatings, resulting in improved mechanical properties and enhanced wear and corrosion behaviors. Finally, laser posttreatments can improve coatings density and adhesion, and also induce phase transformations and structure refinement. As a summary, laser treatments seem particularly promising for improving the thermal spray coating microstructure and the coating/substrate adhesion. In addition, they offer a more environmentally friendly alternative to the conventional surface preparation treatments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Technological Context
Plasma spraying is a technology used to produce thick coatings from feedstock powder materials. The quality of plasma-sprayed coatings depends on up to 50 different process parameters (Ref 1), which mainly relate to the characteristics of the powder, powder injection, plasma gun, plasma flame, and substrate. For theoretical, practical, and economic reasons (e.g., parameter interdependence, time requirements, etc.), it is only possible to control some of those parameters. A maximum of 8 to 12 parameters can actually be controlled in order to obtain the desired coating structure and in-service properties (Ref 2). However, the targeted coating characteristics cannot always be achieved due to the large number of process parameters combinations. Auxiliary systems can be used to uncouple some interrelated effects and allow for new degrees of freedom in the process control. For instance, laser treatments can be applied to improve specific coating properties at different stages of the thermal spraying process.
Thermal spray processes begin with surface preparation to ensure adequate coating/substrate adhesion. Conventionally, substrates are prepared using a two-step treatment: cleaning (degreasing) and roughening. In order to remove the organic substances present on the as-machined surfaces, the degreasing step uses solvents or chemicals which are potentially harmful for the operator and the environment. The roughening of the surface aims to improve the mechanical anchoring of the impinging particles which build up the coating. The most extended surface roughening technique is grit blasting. It produces large plastic deformations throughout the surface and induces microstructural changes in the immediate subsurface, which result in compressive residual stresses. Fatigue resistance is expected to increase as a result of the stress level in the subsurface region, fact that has been corroborated for materials such as pure titanium (Ref 3) or 316LVM stainless steel (Ref 4). However, the opposite trend has also been observed for other materials such as binary titanium alloys, whose fatigue limit has been reported to decrease by up to 40% after grit blasting (Ref 5, 6). Another drawback of this method is that grit particles usually get entrapped on the substrate and subsequently compromise the coating performance. This effect is particularly important in the case of ductile substrates, which are likely to suffer a surface and subsurface embrittlement due to grit particles acting as tension concentrators. Last but not least, the use of sand or corundum (materials normally used as grit) has been linked with serious diseases such as silicosis, aluminosis, lung scarring, pneumoconiosis, or emphysema (Ref 7). For all these reasons, the viability of alternative techniques such as water/water-air jet (Ref 8), dry ice blasting (Ref 9), or laser (Ref 10) has been studied over the last decade. Among all options, laser is the only treatment which can be integrated with the thermal spray process allowing for a one-step coating process (combining surface preparation and coating deposition). Lasers also offer a better environmental option than conventional treatments. Reduced production time, surface activation, small thermal alteration and negligible residual deformation of the bulk material, and limited surface contamination, account among other advantages of laser hybrid options (Ref 11). In addition, laser treatments can be used for substrate preheating (Ref 12) before thermal spraying or to improve the coating properties (adhesion, density, etc.) afterward (Ref 13, 14). For instance, lasers can be used for surface alloying, which results in different compositions and microstructural changes of the coating/substrate interface. Fine homogeneous microstructures, high-solid solubility and formation of nonequilibrium and amorphous phases have also been reported (Ref 15, 16). However, the full potential of lasers in the field of thermal spraying still has to be explored.
Environmental Context
Over the last decades, the protection of the environment has become a main concern for most of the developed countries (Ref 17). For instance, the EU waste management strategies strongly regulate the disposal of chemicals since 2006 (Ref 18). The substitution of conventional wet deposition processes, which involve chemicals and potentially hazardous effluents, by alternative dry processes (such as thermal spraying or laser cladding) has been therefore encouraged in surface finishing. These recent environmental regulations on processes, materials and products are triggering new technology developments that, together with cost competition, will probably force significant changes in the near future. In this context, the implementation of new laser technologies is likely to increase.
A good example of this trend is the substitution of the electrodeposition process used for the production of hard chromium coatings (Ref 19). This wet process requires the use of CrO3 compounds (Ref 20), which are toxic, carcinogenic, and hazardous for the environment (Ref 21, 22). Depending on the application, a number of replacement technologies are available, comprising wet deposition technologies (e.g., trivalent chromium plating, nickel-based electroplating, electroless nickel, and nickel alloy coatings) and dry deposition technologies (e.g., microwelding, cladding, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD), and thermal spray technology) (Ref 23-25). Thermal spray has already been validated as an alternative process for aerospace components, where the outstanding performance of high-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) coatings (e.g., carbide cermets—W, Cr—in metallic matrix) was demonstrated (Ref 26). Although research on laser technologies as alternatives to hard chromium plating has been going on for a decade, further investigation is still needed (Ref 25, 27, 28). Recently, laser cladding, which relies on laser to melt a powder onto a substrate to form a coating (Ref 29), has been used to replace electrodeposition of WC-Co (Ref 30).
As environmental aspects are becoming increasingly important in the evaluation of industrial processes, comprehensive environmental assessment methodologies have been developed in parallel. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is commonly used to identify and compare the impact of different processes on human health and the environment (Ref 31). LCA methodology has been applied since 2006 to compare the environmental impacts of various thermal spraying techniques used as alternative dry processes to replace electrodeposition (Ref 32-34). First LCA studies on laser processes are even more recent. A comparative study (to be published) carried out at LERMPS (Belfort, France) shows that laser pretreatments (texturing and ablation) have no significant environmental impact, unlike traditional surface preparation methods (degreasing and grit blasting). Laser cladding and in situ laser remelting after plasma spraying were also demonstrated to be clean technologies (Ref 35, 36). The reduced environmental footprint of laser processes highlights their potential to become the “best available technology” in the dry deposition field. Next sections will describe the laser interaction with matter and present specific laser applications for the field of thermal spray technologies.
Laser Interaction with Matter
Lasers can produce an intense monochromatic beam of coherent electromagnetic radiation of any frequency (visible, infrared (IR), ultraviolet (UV), x-ray, etc.), whose amplitude can be continuous (continuous wave mode, CW) or pulsed (pulsed wave mode, PW) with respect to time. CW lasers cover the spectral range from 365 to 1000 nm with output powers greater than 100 W (Ref 37, 38). Pulsed lasers cover a larger part of the electromagnetic spectrum and are advantageous for some applications as higher peak powers can be achieved: the shorter the pulse, the higher the output peak power for the same average power (Ref 37, 39, 40).
Laser energy is absorbed following two complementary mechanisms, namely the photonic absorption and the inverse Bremsstrahlung absorption (Ref 41), which result in the excitation of electrons in matter. The relaxation of these electrons follows three different mechanisms depending on the electric properties of the irradiated material. Excited electrons are trapped in the case of insulating materials; heat radiation occurs in the case of semiconductor materials; and a quantum of vibration energy (phonon) is emitted in the case of conducting materials. In the later case, the relaxation phenomenon induces either thermal effects (vaporization occurs due to the local increasing of temperature) or nonthermal effects such as photoablation (Ref 42).
The laser-matter interaction depends on the material properties (e.g., chemical and physical properties, surface roughness), the laser radiation characteristics (e.g., wavelength, energy density, laser fluence, and duration of irradiation), and the surrounding atmosphere (e.g., pressure and temperature) (Ref 43, 44). For instance, different effects on irradiated matter are observed at different laser fluence thresholds (Ref 45, 46). A number of laser treatments are thus available depending on the type of material to be irradiated and the laser beam characteristics (Ref 47). Figure 1 shows a selection of laser machining treatments and their effects on metallic substrates as a function of the power density and interaction time (Ref 43).
In the particular case of laser ablation of metals (i.e., materials with free electrons), the laser wavelength and the pulse time duration were pointed out as the key parameters of the ablation mechanism (Ref 48). Principally, the ablation results either from the thermal effect due to IR low-energy photons or from the photonic effect due to UV high-energy photons. Laser surface cleaning and laser ablation imply the removal of contaminants (oxides, oils, etc.) or matter, respectively, by a transition from their solid state to dispersed phases. Usually, evaporation takes place when the vapor pressure of the liquid phase exceeds the surrounding pressure (Ref 49). For high-thermal inputs, however, the solid-liquid and liquid-gas transitions are not clearly defined. In fact, these transitions can be achieved simultaneously by rapid heating of a solid to a temperature over its boiling point.
Considering low-energy photons, laser ablation of conductive materials results from three sequential effects (Ref 44), namely laser beam absorption, thermalization, and heat transfer. The former is caused by electrostatic interaction between the magnetic field caused by the radiation and the valence electrons of the material. Depending on the energy of the photons (i.e., the beam wavelength), the absorbed intensity varies with the depth following the Beer-Lambert relationship. Some of the parameters that significantly influence the radiation absorption are the skin depth, the surface temperature, the angle of incidence of the laser beam, and the substrate surface topography. Among those, the key parameter is the skin depth that is the depth at which the intensity amplitude decays by a factor of 0.37 (i.e., 1/e). The skin depth (δ) depends on the laser wavelength λ (m) and the material extinction dimensionless coefficient κ that is the imaginary part of the complex index of refraction (n) (Ref 50) following the next equation:
Table 1 displays values of the absorption characteristics (λ = 1.06 μm) for some metallic materials, under a normal incidence angle and an ideal surface (plane without roughness) (Ref 51).
The radiation absorption in the bulk is then converted into heat via different types of collisions (photon-electron, electron-electron, or electron-phonon). The thermalization process takes place when this heat input rises the energy of the valence electrons that start to vibrate. These collisions and vibrations quickly increase the temperature of a layer of thickness equal to the heat penetration depth (d):
where D is the material thermal diffusivity (m2/s) and t is the diffusion time (s) (Ref 52).
Heat transfer is dominated by the heat conduction and thus, it is proportional to the temperature gradient. The short duration of laser pulses (10−13-10−10 s) during ablation prevent heat conduction into the substrate and therefore this treatment does not produce significant heat-affected zones in the bulk material (Ref 53). This causes an extremely fast increase of thermal energy in the skin depth, so that melting and vaporization of the material take place, followed by ionization and formation of a dense plasma (Ref 54). The rapid expansion of this plasma is usually described by the equations of continuity, momentum, and energy conservation (Ref 55). This expansion and the associated pressure drop generate uniaxial compression stresses in the direction of the shock wave from which tensile stresses parallel to the surface are generated (Ref 56).
Laser texturing is a treatment in which the energy of the laser beam is concentrated in a small spot. The laser beam interaction with matter, in this case, can be described by a cyclic process determined by the pulse frequency. The cycle starts when the laser impact induces the melting of a thin layer of material which is subsequently vaporized (Ref 57). The vapor plume formed induces a recoil pressure on the molten material, which is expelled toward the edges of the impact (Ref 58). Most of the melted material returns to its original place after the pulse, forming a melt pool (Ref 59), however, some material can be expelled and form a ring of recast material surrounding the textured cavities (Ref 60) (Fig. 2). It is important to clarify that the melt pools are only formed when IR ns-to-ms pulsed lasers are used; they do not form if UV or IR ultrashort pulsed lasers are used. It must also be highlighted that the amount of energy absorbed by the material depends on its thermal diffusivity and the laser beam pulse duration, which in turn depends on the laser frequency and energy (Ref 52). A low-thermal diffusivity means that the energy is absorbed by the surface of the material, resulting in surface melting and vaporization, while the bulk remains cold and therefore unaffected (Ref 60).
Selected Cases of Integrated Laser Surface Treatments
Laser-Integrated Pretreatments
Coating adhesion is the most important in-service coating property, which in most cases is achieved by the mechanical anchoring of the coating onto a roughened substrate surface. Therefore, substrate preparation is required to provide suitable surface conditions for coating anchoring. The most commonly used pretreatment before thermal spraying consists of surface degreasing using solvents followed by grit blasting with α-alumina white corundum. However, this two-step method is time consuming, not environmentally friendly and has other potential drawbacks, as previously described.
Alternative pretreatments have been studied by several research groups. Denoirjean et al. (Ref 61, 62) demonstrated that ceramic (Al2O3) coatings deposited onto low-carbon steel substrates previously oxidized up to 300 °C under a CO2 atmosphere significantly improved the coating tensile adhesion. These improvements are related to the growth of a Wüstite (FeO) layer on top of the metallic substrates during the oxidizing step, which leads to epitaxial solidification of the alumina lamellae. However, this approach cannot easily be applied for industrial process due to the relatively high temperature required, which can lead to metallurgical modifications of the metallic substrates. Water jet, carbonic gas, and laser were also studied as potential alternative surface preparation methods (Ref 52, 63). However, laser processes are the only ones that can be applied to water-sensitive materials. Among laser pretreatments, ablation of the substrate (a few milliseconds before it is impacted by sprayed particles) proved to achieve similar tensile adhesion values to those obtained after conventional surface preparation (Ref 64).
Ablation: Case Study of Aluminum and Titanium Alloys
The main parameters influencing the ablation are the pulse duration, the beam energy, and the surface absorptivity for a given wavelength. For any given material, the laser-matter interaction leads to different local effects at the outer surface (Ref 64-66), like the generation of craters where chemical inclusions or geometric defects (scratches, etc.) are located on the surface. For energy densities ranging between the ablation threshold (which permits to clean the surface from contaminants, oils, dust, etc.) and the surface melting point, the crater density increases with the energy density, resulting in an increased average surface roughness. For higher energy densities, a smoothing effect takes place due to the flow of molten matter toward the periphery of the craters (Fig. 3). Another possible effect consists in the growth of an oxide layer on the ablated metallic surface, as a result of the increased surface temperature after irradiation (Fig. 4). The thickness of this oxide layer depends on the laser parameters and material, and it can be as thin as a few nanometers (Ref 66).
Ablating the substrate surface just before the particle impingements also leads to desorption of contaminants and as a result to lamellae with lower splashing (Fig. 5) (Ref 67). This allows better particles/substrate contact which results in improved interfacial adhesion.
The adhesion mechanism is ruled by different phenomena depending on the surface pretreatment. The surface roughness induced after degreasing and grit blasting (conventional pretreatment) promotes the mechanical anchoring of molten particles (Ref 68), whereas it is the low roughness (<1 μm) and presence of an oxide layer (depending on the type of material) that enable the physico-chemical bonding between both materials after laser ablation (Fig. 6) (Ref 67, 69).
In some cases, like the ablation of aluminum AISI 2017, no oxygen can be detected at the interface although a native oxide layer was clearly observed on the as-received substrates (Fig. 7). Interactions between particles and substrate can be promoted in order to improve the interfacial adhesion as shown in Table 2, whichever the spraying process or material type.
Preheating: Case Study of Aluminum and Titanium Alloys
The quality of thermally sprayed coatings is strongly dependent on the flattening dynamics of the impinging particles that build-up on the deposit. This in turn depends on many factors such as the substrate surface (type of material, temperature, surface topography, and presence of contaminants) and the characteristics of the impinging sprayed particles (temperature, velocity, diameter, oxidation, etc.) (Ref 70). Substrate temperature strongly influences the coating microstructure due to its effect on particles/substrate interactions, and it is also related to the thermal desorption of surface adsorbates/condensates resulting in a better coating/substrate adhesion and a better cohesion of the coating (Ref 71-73). However, temperature must be controlled to avoid macroscopic residual stresses during the cooling process. Preheating of the substrates can be done in a furnace or in situ using the thermal spray gun (plasma, flame, etc.), but intensive oxidation of the surface and distortions of the material can occur due to the large area of the jet and the treatment duration. This is why laser technology is a promising alternative process for this application. Indeed, using optical fibers, a local simultaneous treatment can be implemented to limit the heated area to the one impinged by plasma-sprayed particles, thus preventing undesired surface modifications in the surrounding areas (Fig. 8) (Ref 74). It has been proved that the local oxidation after laser preheating (if any) is also minimized to a thickness of few nanometers, which does not affect the coating adhesion (Ref 75, 76).
Different coating properties can be optimized selecting adequate processing parameters (laser beam energy, wavelength, continuous/pulsed, etc.). For instance, porosity, hardness, and adhesion can be significantly modified by implementing a laser heating pretreatment (Fig. 9) (Ref 64, 77-79). Further improvement of the adhesion was achieved by combining laser ablation process and local laser heating, particularly in the case of cold spray (Fig. 10) (Ref 80).
Laser-Integrated Hybrid Treatments: Simultaneous Remelting of Metallic Ni-Based Layers and Ceramic Alloy (ZrO2)
Hybrid plasma laser deposition manufacturing (PLDM), also called laser-plasma hybrid spraying system (LPHS) or in situ laser remelting, is a new technique that combines a thermal spray gun and a laser to improve the coating properties. This technique was used combining a low-pressure plasma spray with a high-power CW CO2 laser irradiation, allowing the production of high-performance tribo-materials with good adhesion and scarce microporosity (Ref 81, 82). In ceramic materials (i.e., materials without free electrons) the far-IR radiation is the better absorbed and therefore, the CO2 laser seems the most suitable choice to treat them. However, CO2 lasers are expensive, require complicate maintenance procedures and its radiation cannot be conducted by optical fibers, contrary to the Nd:YAG laser radiation (near-IR radiation). Therefore, YAG and diode lasers are preferred for industrial applications. Hybrid spraying using a YAG fiber laser combined with plasma spraying has often been applied to ceramic layers such as thermal barrier coatings (TBCs), in order to improve some of their properties. For instance, thermal diffusivity, thermal shock resistance, hardness, high-temperature erosion resistance, and hot oxidation resistance in hot sandy environments were improved by the formation of denser coatings (Ref 82-85). The bonding strength between particles was greatly increased and the interconnected porosity and cracks were prevented (Ref 86). Good interface between the coating and the substrate, and smooth coating surfaces were also obtained (Ref 85). Although similar results were found using diode lasers, the presence of cracks and delamination due to rapid solidification following the laser treatment, presented a risk of rapid degradation by thermal fatigue (Ref 87).
Since metals reflect most of the laser energy, the diode laser (λ = 0.848 μm) is a better choice to treat metallic alloys than the CO2 laser (λ = 10.6 μm) or the Nd:YAG laser (λ = 1.06 μm). Ni-based layers resulting from in situ laser remelting using a diode laser present dendritic and dense structures (Fig. 11) with enhanced mechanical properties compared with those of lamellar structures resulting from thermal spray (Ref 88, 89). The coating adhesion is also improved as it is metallurgically bonded to the substrate. It presents finer structures without modifying the phase content of the layer (Ref 36). In situ laser remelting reduces also the cooling stresses due to the low level of laser energy required. In addition, this hybrid technique improves the wear and corrosion resistance of the coatings. For instance, the results from the wear tests carried out on NiCrBSi coatings showed that the adhesive wear mechanism was caused by oxidation in the case of the laser remelted hybrid layer and by surface fatigue for the as-sprayed layer (Ref 88). Corrosion potentials of as-sprayed coatings were found to be approximately 150 mV lower than the one of remelted coatings (Ref 90). Different corrosion mechanisms take place in both coatings, even if the feedstock material is the same. The lower corrosion resistance observed in as-sprayed coatings is caused by a greater porosity and higher concentration of defects, which allow the electrolyte to reach the substrate surface. This accelerates the formation of a galvanic couple between coating and substrate, accelerating the dissolution rate of the substrate. Iron oxides produced from the substrate corrosion travel through the defects toward the outer surface, modifying the composition of the layer. On the contrary, the substrate surface of in situ remelted samples is not reached, because of a higher density. As an example, Table 3 shows some of the properties of metallic alloy coatings treated by laser remelting hybrid technique.
Selected Cases of Nonintegrated Laser Surface Treatments
Laser Pretreatments: Surface Texturing of Aluminum Alloy Substrates
A number of techniques for surface texturing, such as vibrorolling, abrasive machining, reactive ion etching, abrasive jet machining lithography, and anisotropic etching have been developed over the last decades (Ref 91). Although laser surface texturing (LST) has been used for over 15 years in the magnetic storage industry (Ref 92, 93) and for tribology and sealing applications (Ref 94-97), it is a novel pretreatment process for thermal spray applications. The potential of this technique lies in the wide range of materials that can be treated (including ductile materials), the reduction of the heat-affected area and the low deformations induced within thin substrates. These characteristics make LST pretreatments suitable to produce surfaces free of grit-particle inclusions, what directly improves the quality of thermal-sprayed coatings.
LST is a laser engraving technique which involves the construction of geometric patterns, as for example shallow spot-shape cavities at quasi-regular intervals or crossed thin grooves (Fig. 12) (Ref 98). The desired pattern can be obtained either by scanning the laser along a defined path (maintaining the focal distance and modulating the pulses to vaporize the material at desired locations) or by irradiating the substrate through a mask. Although texturing can be done using a single high-energy pulse, it was demonstrated that higher quality textures can be achieved using multiple low-energy laser pulses (Ref 57). The quality of texturing depends on the characteristics of the laser beam (e.g., wavelength, pulse duration, spot diameter, pulse frequency, and defocusing distance), the scanner characteristics (e.g., speed of scanning and resolution), the physical characteristics of the substrate (e.g., absorption coefficient, thermal conductivity, surface condition, and vaporization temperature), and other characteristics related to the environment (Ref 60, 99, 100). Therefore, it can be said that the quality of the textures highly depends on the laser-matter interaction. An inadequate set of process parameters for a specific material can cause the melting of the surrounding areas of the textured patterns, followed by rapid resolidification and thermal cracking. It can also result in undesired vapor blast ejection of melted material (spatter) throughout the entire surface (Ref 59, 101). In addition, processing difficulties can be inherent to the material. For instance, aluminum laser processing is complex due to its high reflectivity to light, its high-thermal conductivity and the high-melting and boiling point of the alumina pacifying layer (formed by self-extinguishing oxidation reaction) (Ref 102).
Research has been conducted to determine the effects of diverse laser parameters on a number of texture features (including cavity dimensions, amount of recast material, roughness, etc.) for different materials, such as stainless steel (Ref 103-106), nickel (Ref 106), titanium alloys (Ref 105-109), and aluminum alloys (Ref 102, 105, 110-112). For aluminum alloy AISI 2017, the average depth of textured cavities was found to increase with increasing number of pulses per cavity and decreasing scan velocities; the cavities diameter and the volume of recast material surrounding the textured cavities was shown to increase with increasing laser power and defocusing distance (Ref 112). Cavities diameters tend to asymptotic values related to the beam spot size, whichever the treated material (Ref 108). The average roughness of textured aluminum alloy AA6056 substrates was shown to be mainly influenced by the frequency and scan velocity (Ref 105).
Suitable type of laser and adequate setting of processing parameters are necessary in order to tailor textures to the requirements of different applications (Ref 113). For instance, the adhesion of thermal-sprayed coatings on textured substrates is highly influenced by the pattern geometry and “additional” surface roughness (spatter and recast material), because both of them modify the surface contact area of the substrate (Ref 110). Particularly, the optimal cavities dimensions (i.e., diameter and depth) must be adapted depending on the sprayed powder average size (d 0.5) to allow a good coating filling (Fig. 13). Adhesion of Ni-Al coatings on textured aluminum AISI 2017 was qualitatively assessed by interface indentation. Toughness values (and therefore adhesion) were found to slightly decrease with decreasing laser power (from 6.5 MPa m−1/2 at 17.3 W to 4 MPa m−1/2 at 10 W), but in all cases they remain higher than those reported for conventionally pretreated surfaces (3.5 MPa m−1/2) (Ref 110). Preliminary adhesion tests conducted following (ASTM C633-79 standard) showed the same trend (Ref 111).
Laser Posttreatments: Densification of PEEK Coating on 304L Substrate
Various coatings materials (metals, polymers, ceramics, and composites) have been studied to enhance the ultimate tribological behavior of substrate materials. The need to improve the mechanical and morphological properties of these coatings has driven the research on postprocessing of thermal spraying coatings (Ref 114-116). Laser postprocessing has been widely used over the last decade not only to densify thermal-sprayed coatings, but also to achieve structure refinement, to induce phase transformations and to enhance coating/substrate adhesion (Ref 117-119).
Metallic coatings such as aluminum, zinc, nickel, chromium, molybdenum, and their alloys and composites such as NiCrBS and NiCrBCSi(Fe), have been widely studied to improve the corrosion and wear resistance of substrates (Ref 120-126). Laser postspray treatment (Ref 120, 121, 123, 124) or furnace annealing (Ref 122, 125, 126) are the most widely used techniques to induce structure refinement and densification of metallic coatings, and to improve their mechanical and metallurgical bonding.
Laser remelting of ceramic coatings and its effect on the microstructure, phase transformation and mechanical properties has been investigated by many authors (Ref 114-117, 127). For instance, postspray laser remelting of AT-13 (Al2O3-13 wt.% TiO2) and alumina (Al2O3) thermal-sprayed coatings can be applied to transform as-sprayed metastable γ-Al2O3 phase into stable α-Al2O3 phase (Ref 117, 118). Porosity and lamellae structures in as-sprayed coatings have been effectively eliminated after Nd:YAG and CO2 laser remelting, resulting in compact and homogenous microstructures (Ref 128-131). Excimer lasers have also been used for refining coating microstructure of plasma-sprayed alumina-titania (Ref 132).
Laser posttreatments have also been used for glazing of plasma-sprayed YSZ coatings (Ref 133), surface roughness reduction of zirconia coatings (Ref 134) and microstructure stabilization using Nd:YAG lasers. Recently, a diode laser was employed to increase the biocompatibility of plasma-sprayed titania-HA functionally graded coatings (Ref 135).
Organic polymeric coatings have gained increasing importance within the thermal spray research community. Organic materials are the most widely used to coat metallic substrates because they provide protection against corrosion and wear. Performance of coated metals depends on the metallic substrate, coating characteristics (polymer composition, integrity and thickness), interfacial adhesion, and environmental conditions. Among the most studied organics polymers for coating deposition are polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polypyrrole (PPy), polyaniline (PANI), polyimide (PI), polyetheretherketone (PEEK), polyvinyl acetate (PVA), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC), since they can easily be processed and present adequate properties. Particularly, PEEK coatings are extensively used to enhance the in-service properties of various metallic substrates for different industrial applications.
PEEK is a semicrystalline thermoplastic material with excellent tribological properties, good chemical and wear resistance, good thermal stability, good mechanical properties, and low-frictional properties (Ref 136-141). These properties and the low levels of removable ionic species that are inherent to pure PEEK, make this polymer suitable for different applications in analytical, semiconductors, medical, and food industries. In addition, these properties are retained at temperatures as high as 315 °C (Ref 142, 143), what increases its value as feedstock material for coating applications.
Polymer powder deposition can be done using several techniques such as electrophoresis, thermal spraying, and printing (Ref 68, 144-148). Flame spraying is the most widely used process to deposit polymeric powders onto metallic substrates, due to its reduced heating temperature and low-operating cost compared to other thermal spray processes (Ref 149-154). Unfortunately, as-sprayed organic polymers coatings present low-mechanical properties due to their high porosity and low adhesion to metallic substrates (Fig. 14). To avoid this, different postspraying heat treatments have been studied by several authors (Ref 14, 149, 155, 156).
Densification of polymeric coatings onto metallic substrates is conventionally performed using flame, oven, and microwave techniques (Ref 144, 145, 147). The viability of lasers for this application is still unclear due to the varying absorption coefficients of polymers for different laser wavelengths. Absorption occurs if the frequency of the incident photons corresponds to the frequency associated with the transition energy of irradiated molecules (Ref 14, 149, 155-158). Part of the absorbed energy is transformed into thermal energy, which leads to coating melting. The exceeding energy is partially absorbed (heating the substrate) and partially reflected by the metallic substrate/polymer coating interface. Densification of polymers coatings on metallic substrates is usually caused by both transmitted and reflected laser beam radiation. Figure 15 shows the schematics of as-sprayed and laser posttreated coatings.
The advantages of laser densification over the conventional densification techniques (furnace) are the shorter treatment time and the fast response of the polymer to the laser beam radiation. Specially, UV laser radiation can break chemical bonds and cause chemical reactions on the irradiated surface, owing to simultaneous photochemical and thermal effects. UV laser treatments proved to be more effective than IR lasers in preadhesion surface treatments of polymers (Ref 159, 160), due to chemical activation of the material particles with minor heat effect. There are different types of lasers in the domain between UV and IR to postprocess thermal spray coatings: diode laser (near IR, λ = 0.808 and 0.940 μm), Nd:YAG laser (near IR, λ = 1.06 μm), excimer laser (UV, λ = 0.193 μm ArF, 0.248 μm KrF, 0.308 μm XeCl, 0.353 μm XeF) and CO2 laser (mid-IR, λ = 10.64 μm). The choice of laser depends on the type of application and material to be irradiated.
Coating remelting and morphology modification require deep penetration of laser radiation, which is achieved by long laser treatments in CW mode, whereas coating smoothing or glazing is obtained by short laser treatments in pulsed mode. Current research in laser densification focuses on optimizing the main laser operating parameters of three types of lasers: Nd:YAG laser, CO2 laser, and diode laser. Studies on densification of polymers coatings (Ref 13, 149, 156) have shown that with CO2 laser, the incident laser beam is easily absorbed by polymers, whereas most of them are transparent at the wavelength of Nd:YAG laser. Diode laser beam radiation is less absorbed by most organic polymers, leading to a greater heating of the coating/substrate interface which results in improved adhesion.
For instance, PEEK response to different laser beam radiations depends on the type of laser used, which is due to PEEK’s laser-dependant transmission factor: 50% for Nd:YAG laser, 10% for CO2 laser, and 80% for diode laser (Ref 13, 149). Figure 16 shows the microstructure of PEEK coatings after densification using these three types of lasers.
Densification posttreatment using Nd:YAG lasers with a reduced interaction time and a high-power density can be used to improve adhesion and compactness of PEEK coatings. Similar results (Fig. 16a) can be achieved at lower power densities by reducing the operating speed, while the energy per unit area remains relatively high (~21 J/mm2). The polymeric coating presents a vitreous structure, which indicate slight polymer overheating (phase transformation from crystalline to amorphous). Decreasing the treatment velocity (i.e., incrementing interaction time) excessively can result in sample overheating and coating degradation by polymer vaporization (Fig. 16b). Figure 16(c) shows the microstructure of a PEEK coating densified using a CO2 laser at a relatively low energy per unit area (7.10 J/mm2). It can be seen that a good polymer melting was obtained due to the high-absorption coefficient of PEEK for this type of laser beam, yet the coating adhesion to the metallic substrate is not satisfactory (porosity remains at the interface). Similarly to what happens with the Nd:YAG laser, an inadequate set of laser parameters (e.g., slower operating speed and higher laser power, i.e., moderate laser energy per unit area: 19 J/mm2) can lead to overheating of the coating which can result in surface degradation such as polymer vaporization and substantial reduction of thickness (Fig. 16d). It has to be said that coating densification using CO2 and Nd:YAG lasers requires the setting of a large defocusing distance, and consequently larger laser spot diameter, both correlated with moderate laser powers in order to avoid thermal degradation of the polymer. A considerable improvement of the PEEK coating (density-wise) can be noticed after densification by diode laser treatment (Fig. 16e) with no changes in polymer crystallinity. Finally, diode laser densification of PEEK coatings results in excellent adhesion due to better penetration of the laser beam radiation up to the interface. Once more, inadequate setting of laser operating parameters, such as moderate operating speeds and high-laser energies (71.2 J/mm2), fails to fully densify PEEK coatings, and pores can still be observed (Fig. 16f). It must be highlighted that thermal degradation does not occur under these conditions, but polymer melting is incomplete. A relatively low-operating speed during diode and Nd:YAG laser processing is needed, in order to obtain dense polymer coatings with no change in crystallinity using a single pass of laser beam. When it comes to CO2 laser, three times higher operating speed must be used to obtain the same results.
Summary
The implementation of laser treatments before, during, and after the thermal spray process allows for enhanced coating properties, which can be obtained using new degrees of freedom in the process parameters control. Recent research developments in that field and their potential benefits for the thermal spray industry were reviewed in this article, and several laser case studies were presented in further detail. Laser texturing, for instance, is a promising substrate pretreatment technique aiming to improve coating adhesion by mechanical anchoring and chemical bonding. Integrated (hybrid) laser/plasma spray techniques permit to increase coating/substrate adhesion, to reduce coating residual stresses, to improve coating cohesion, and to modify the microstructure. Coating densification can also be achieved using laser posttreatments. It must be highlighted that in all cases, the characteristics of the laser radiation (wavelength, energy density, pulse duration, etc.) must be optimized depending on each material and application. Lasers potential relies on an exclusive combination of processing advantages, like the wide range of materials that can be treated (including water-sensitive and embrittlement-prone materials), the reduced heat-affected area and the low deformation of thin substrates. Other benefits of laser technologies are their low-processing times, high flexibility, precision and low-environmental impact, which could encourage industrial coating manufacturers to implement them at different stages of the thermal spray processes.
References
T.J. Steeper, A.J. Rotolico, J.E. Nerz, W.L. Riggs, D.J. Varacalle, and G.C. Wilson, Optimizing Plasma Spraying Alumina-Titania Coatings Using Statistical Methods, Thermal Spray Coatings: Research, Design and Applications, C.C. Berndt and T.F. Bernecki, Ed., ASM International, Anaheim, CA, 1993, p 37-48
R.B. Heimann, Plasma-Spray Coating: Principles and Applications, 2nd ed., Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008
X.P. Jiang, X.Y. Wang, J.X. Li, D.Y. Li, C.-S. Man, M.J. Shepard, and T. Zhai, Enhancement of Fatigue and Corrosion Properties of Pure Ti by Sandblasting, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2006, 429(1-2), p 30-35
M. Multigner, E. Frutos, J.L. González-Carrasco, J.A. Jiménez, P. Marín, and J. Ibáñez, Influence of the Sandblasting on the Subsurface Microstructure of 316LVM Stainless Steel: Implications on the Magnetic and Mechanical Properties, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 2009, 29(4), p 1357-1360
C. Leinenbach and D. Eifler, Fatigue and Cyclic Deformation Behaviour of Surface-Modified Titanium Alloys in Simulated Physiological Media, Biomaterials, 2006, 27(8), p 1200-1208
M. Multigner, E. Frutos, C.L. Mera, J. Chao, and J.L. González-Carrasco, Interrogations on the Sub-Surface Strain Hardening of Grit Blasted Ti-6Al-4V Alloy, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 203(14), p 2036-2040
E. Petavratzi, S. Kingman, and I. Lowndes, Particulates from Mining Operations: A Review of Sources, Effects and Regulations, Miner. Eng., 2005, 18(12), p 1183-1199
A. Chillman, M. Ramulu, and M. Hashish, Water Jet and Water-Air Jet Surface Processing of a Titanium Alloy: A Parametric Evaluation, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng., 2010, 132(1), 011012 (10 pp)
E. Uhlmann and A. El Mernissi, Pre-treatment by Dry Ice Blasting for Adhesive Bonding, Prod. Eng., 2008, 2(2), p 133-138
C. Coddet, G. Montavon, S. Ayrault-Costil, O. Freneaux, F. Rigolet, G. Barbezat, F. Folio, A. Diard, and P. Wazen, Surface Preparation and Thermal Spray in a Single Step: The PROTAL Process—Example of Application for an Aluminum-Base Substrate, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 1999, 8(2), p 235-242
“Laser Material Processing”, Centro Laser of Valenzano (BA), Promotional Literature, undated, http://www.centrolaser.it/en/lavorazioni.html, Accessed 31 October 2010
J. Cedelle, M. Vardelle, and P. Fauchais, Influence of Stainless Steel Substrate Preheating on Surface Topography and on Millimeter- and Micrometer-Sized Splat Formation, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 201(3-4), p 1373-1382
C. Zhang, G. Zhang, V. Ji, H. Liao, S. Costil, and C. Coddet, Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Flame-Sprayed PEEK Coating Remelted by Laser Process, Prog. Org. Coat., 2009, 66, p 248-253
P. Laurens, B. Sadras, F. Decobert, F. Arefi, and J. Amouroux, Modifications of Polyether-Etherketone Surface After 193 nm and 248 nm Excimer Laser Radiation, Appl. Surf. Sci, 1999, 138-139, p 93-96
J.W. Dini, Laser Surface Modification Offers Promise for Various Coating Processes and Substrates, Met. Finish., 1997, 95(10), p 10
P.A. Molian, Structural Characterization of Laser-Processed Molybdenum Steel, Mater. Sci. Eng., 1983, 58(2), p 175-180
D.H. Meadows, D.L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth, Universe Books, New York, 1972, p 205
“Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)” Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, European Parliament and Council, December 2006
E.W. Brooman, Environmentally Preferred Alternatives to Cadmium Coatings for Electrical/Electronic Applications, Environmental Aspects of Electrochemical Technology: Applications in Electronics, M. Datta, J.M. Fenton, and E.W. Brooman, Ed., The Electrochemical Society, Pennington, 1997, p 219-238
C.G. Fink, Process of Electrodepositing Chromium and of Preparing Baths Therefor, U.S. Patent 1581188, 1926
B. Volesky and Z. Holan, Biosorption of Heavy-Metals, Biotechnol. Prog., 1995, 11(3), p 235-250
V.K. Gupta, A.K. Shrivastawa, and N. Jain, Biosorption of Chromium (VI) from Aqueous Solutions by Green Algae Spirogyra Species, Water Res., 2001, 35(17), p 4079-4085
T.A. Naguy, Alternative to Chromium Coatings: Wet Deposition Technologies, Proceedings of the Sur/Fin, Chicago, IL, 2004
E.W. Brooman, Alternatives to Chromium Coatings: dry Deposition Technologies, Proceedings of the Sur/Fin, Chicago, IL, 2004
G. Bolelli, Replacement of Hard Chromium Plating by Thermal Spraying—Problems, Solutions and Possible Future Approaches, Surf. Eng., 2009, 25(4), p 263-269
K.O. Legg, M. Graham, P. Chang, F. Rastagar, A. Gonzales, and B. Sartwell, The Replacement of Electroplating, Surf. Coat. Technol., 1996, 81(1), p 99-105
E.W. Brooman, Corrosion Performance of Environmentally Acceptable Alternatives to Cadmium and Chromium Coatings: Chromium—Part I, Met. Finish., 2000, 98(7), p 38-43
E.W. Brooman, Corrosion Performance of Environmentally Acceptable Alternatives to Cadmium and Chromium Coatings: Chromium—Part II, Met. Finish., 2000, 98(8), p 39-45
L. Dubourg and J. Archambeault, Technological and Scientific Landscape of Laser Cladding Process in 2007, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, 202(24), p 5863-5869
C.P. Paul, H. Alemohammad, E. Toyserkani, A. Khajepour, and S. Corbin, Cladding of WC-12 Co on Low Carbon Steel Using a Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2007, 464(1-2), p 170-176
A. Tukker, Life Cycle Assessment as a Tool in Environmental Impact Assessment, Environ. Impact Assess., 2000, 20(4), p 435-456
G. Montavon, A. Vardelle, N. Krishnan, P. Ulloa, S. Costil, and H. Liao, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Thermal Sprayed and Chromium Electroplated Coatings, Thermal Spray 2006: Building on 100 Years of Success, B.R. Marple, M.M. Hyland, Y.-C. Lau, R.S. Lima, and J. Voye, Ed., ASM International, Seattle, WA, 2006, p 1399-1405
F. Hlawka, E. Bassaine, M. Jourdon, and A. Cornet. Life Cycle Assessment: A New Approach in the Choice of Surface Treatments, Proceedings of the SMT 21, Paris, France, 2007, Published on CD-ROM
A. Moign, A. Vardelle, J.G. Legoux, and N.J. Themelis, LCA Comparison of Electroplating and Other Thermal Spray Processes, Expanding Thermal Spray Performance to New Markets and Applications, B.R. Marple, M.M. Hyland, Y.-C. Lau, C.-J. Li, R.S. Lima, and G. Montavon, Ed., ASM International, Las Vegas, NV, 2009, p 1207-1212
N. Serres, F. Hlawka, S. Costil, C. Langlade, F. Machi, and A. Cornet, Dry Coatings and Ecodesign. Part 1—Environmental Performances & Chemical Properties, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 204(1-2), p 187-196
N. Serres, F. Hlawka, S. Costil, C. Langlade, and F. Machi, Microstructures and Environmental Assessment of Metallic NiCrBSi Coatings Manufactured Via Hybrid Plasma Spray Process, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 205(4), p 1039-1046
P. Lucas, E.A. King, and A. Doraiswamy, Comparison of Photostructural Changes Induced by Continuous and Pulsed Laser in Chalcogenide Glass, J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater., 2006, 8(2), p 776-779
K. Tanaka, Photo-induced Phenomena in Chalcogenide Glasses: Subgap Photon Effects, Proceedings of SPIE 2003, C. Zhu, Ed., Vol. 5061, 2003, p 16-23
C.B. Schaffer and E. Mazur, Micromachining Using Ultrashort Pulses from a Laser Oscillator, Opt. Photonics News, 2001, 12(4), p 20-23
C. Meneghini and A. Villeneuve, As2S3 Photosensitivity by Two-Photon Absorption: Holographic Gratings and Self-Written Channel Waveguides, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B, 1998, 15(12), p 2946-2950
L. Landau and E. Lifchitz, Physique statistique, MIR Éditions, URSS, Moscow, 1984, p 592 (in French)
G. Petite and P. Daguzan, L’absorption de l’énergie et ses conséquences, École Thématique du CNRS sur l’ablation laser, CNRS Editions, Paris, France, 1996, p 159-218 (in French)
J.C. André and A.B. Vannes, Ed., Techniques d’utilisation des photons—principes et applications, DOPEE Diffusion, Avon, France, 1992, p 708 (in French)
A. Catherinot, D. Damiani, C. Champeaux, and G. Girault, Photoablation par laser, Laser de Puissance et Traitements des Matériaux, A.B. Vannes, Ed., Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1991, p 19-57 (in French)
D. Baüerle, Laser Processing and Chemistry, 2nd ed., Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 1996, p 649
B.N. Chichkov, C. Momma, S. Nolte, F. Von Alvensleben, and A. Tünnermann, Femtosecond, Picosecond and Nanosecond Laser Ablation of Solids, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process., 1996, 63, p 109-115
J.F. Ready, Ed., Handbook of Laser Materials Processing, 1st ed., Laser Institute of America, Magnolia Publishing, Inc., Orlando, 2001
A.B. Vannes, Ed., Laser et industries de transformation, Techniques de documentation Lavoisier, Paris, 1986 (in French)
J.C. Mallet and R. Fournié, Cours de chimie, Dunod, Paris, France, 1995, p 547 (in French)
J.D. McWhirter, Extinction Coefficient and Skin Depth of Alkali Metals from 10 to 1000 nm, Opt. Lasers Eng., 1997, 28, p 305-309
R.C. Weast, Ed., Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 66th ed., CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, FL, 1986
J. Meijer, K. Du, A. Gillner, D. Hoffmann, V.S. Kovalenko, T. Matsunawa, A. Ostendorf, R. Poprawe, and W. Schulz, Laser Machining by Short and Ultrashort Pulses, State of the Art and New Opportunities in the Age of the Photons, CIRP Ann. Manuf. Technol., 2002, 51(2), p 531-550
D. Von Der Linde and K. Sokolowski-Tinten, The Physical Mechanisms of Short-Pulse Laser Ablation, Appl. Surf. Sci, 2000, 154(155), p 1-10
H.W. Bergmann, K. Schutte, E. Schubert, and A. Emmel, Laser-Surface Processing of Metals for Industrial Applications, Appl. Surf. Sci., 1995, 86(1-4), p 259-265
A. Hoffmann and W. Arnold, Calculation and Measurements of the Ultrasonic Signals Generated by Ablating Material With a Q-Switched Pulse Laser, Appl. Surf. Sci, 1996, 96-98, p 71-75
P. Peyre, R. Fabbro, L. Berthe, and C. Dubouchet, Laser Shock Processing of Materials, Physical Processes Involved and Examples of Applications, J. Laser Appl., 1996, 8, p 135-141
S. Bandyopadhyay, H. Gokhale, J.K. Sarin Sundar, G. Sundararajan, and S.V. Joshi, A Statistical Approach to Determine Process Parameter Impact in Nd:YAG Laser Drilling of IN718 and Ti-6Al-4V Sheets, Opt. Lasers Eng., 2005, 43(2), p 163-182
J.M. Jouvard, A. Soveja, and N. Pierron, Thermal Modelling of Metal Surface Texturing by Pulsed Laser, Proceedings of the COMSOL Users Conference, 2006, Paris, France
R.C.P. Wong, A.P. Hoult, J.K. Kim, and T.X. Yu, Improvement of Adhesive Bonding in Aluminium Alloys Using a Laser Surface Texturing Process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1997, 63, p 579-584
D. Neves, A.E. Diniz, and M.S. de Fernandes Lima, Efficiency of the Laser Texturing on the Adhesion of the Coated Twist Drills, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 179, p 139-145
S. Valette, A. Denoirjean, D. Tétard, and P. Lefort, C40E Steel Oxidation Under CO2: Kinetics and Reactional Mechanism, J. Alloys Compd., 2006, 413, p 222-231
A.A. Syed, A. Denoirjean, B. Hannoyer, P. Fauchais, P. Denoirjean, A.A. Khan, and J.C. Labbe, Influence of Substrate Surface Conditions on the Plasma Sprayed Ceramic and Metallic Particles Flattening, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2005, 200, p 2317-2331
J. Foldyna, L. Sitek, J. Ščučka, P. Martinec, J. Valíček, and K. Páleníková, Effects of Pulsating Water Jet Impact on Aluminium Surface, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2009, 209(20), p 6174-6180
S. Costil, H. Liao, O. Chretien, A. Loredo, A. Gammoudi, M. Verdier, and C. Coddet, Influence of Surface Laser Cleaning Combined With Substrate Preheating on Thermal Spray Coating Adhesion, Lasers Eng., 2005, 5-6(15), p 325-345
H. Li, “Role d’une ablation laser in situ sur lespropriétés mécaniques d’un revêtement élaboré par projection thermique,” PhD Thesis, Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard (UTBM), 2006 (in French)
V. Barnier, “Etude de l’oxidation de l’aluminium induite par traitement laser Nd:Yag : conséquences sur les propriétés d’adhérence d’un revêtement d’alumine élaboré par projection thermique,” PhD Thesis, Université de Bourgogne, 2006 (in French)
H. Li, S. Costil, V. Barnier, R. Oltra, H. Liao, and C. Coddet, Surface Preparation by Laser Cleaning in Thermal Spray—An Introduction to the PROTAL® Process, J. Laser Appl., 2008, 20(1), p 12-21
P. Fauchais, Understanding Plasma Spraying, J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 2004, 37(9), p R86-R108
D.K. Christoulis, S. Guetta, V. Guipont, M.H. Berger, M. Jeandin, L. Berthe, M. Nivard, S. Costil, Y. Ichikawa, K. Ogawa, E. Irissou, J.-G. Legoux, and C. Moreau, Cold Spraying Coupled to Nano-Pulsed Nd-Yag Laser Surface Pre-treatment, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2010, 19(5), p 1062-1073
H. Li, S. Costil, H. Liao, C.-J. Li, M.-P. Planche, and C. Coddet, Effects of Surface Conditions on the Flattening Behaviour of Plasma Sprayed Cu Splats, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 200, p 5435-5446
C.-J. Li, Effects of the Surface Adsorbates on the Morphology of Plasma-Sprayed Splats, Thermal Spray 2005: Explore Its Potential!, E. Lugcheider, Ed., ASM International, Basel, Switzerland, 2005, p 311-319
J. Pech, B. Hannoyer, L. Bianchi, A. Denoirjean, and P. Fauchais, Study of Oxide Layer Obtained on 304L Stainless Steel Substrate Heated by a D.C. Plasma Jet, Thermal Spray: A United Forum for Scientific and Technological Advances, C.C. Berndt, Ed., Sept 15-18, 1997 (Indianapolis), ASM International, 1998, p 775-782
M. Fukumoto, S. Katoh, and I. Okane, Splat Behaviour of Plasma Sprayed Particles on Flat Surface, Thermal Spraying: Current Status and Future Trends, A. Ohmori, Ed., High Temperature Society of Japan, Kobe, Japan, 1995, p 353-358
Y. Danlos, “Etude de l’association lasers—projection thermique pour l’optimisation de revêtements,” PhD Thesis, Université de Technologie de Belfort-Montbéliard (UTBM), 2009 (in French)
V. Barnier, O. Heintz, D.E. Roberts, R. Oltra, and S. Costil, XPS and SIMS Study of Aluminium Native Oxide Modifications Induced by Q-Switched Nd:YAG Laser Treatment, Surf. Interface Anal., 2006, 38, p 406-409
V. Barnier, S. Costil, H. Li, C. Coddet, and R. Oltra, Study of Aluminium Oxidation Induced by a Q-switched Nd:YAG Laser Treatment and Its Influence on the Adhesion Properties of a Plasma-Sprayed Alumina Coating, Thermal Spray 2007: Global Coating Solutions, B.R. Marple, M.M. Hyland, Y.-C. Lau, C.-J. Li, R.S. Lima, and G. Montavon, Ed., ASM International, Pekin, China, 2007, p 335-340
M. Bray, A. Cockburn, and W. O’Neil, The Laser Assisted Cold Spray Process and Deposit Characterisation, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 203, p 2851-2857
S. Costil, G. Montavon, H. Liao, and C. Coddet, Laser Hybrid Plasma Spray Processes: Tools to Adjust Coating Structural Characteristics, High Temp. Mater. Process. (Redding, CT), 2006, 10(3), p 327-364
S. Costil, H. Liao, A. Gammoudi, and C. Coddet, Influence of Surface Laser Cleaning Combined With Substrate Preheating on the Splat Morphology, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2005, 14(1), p 31-38
Y. Danlos, S. Costil, X. Guo, H. Liao, and C. Coddet, Ablation Laser and Heating Laser Combined to Cold Spraying, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 205(4), p 1055-1059
S. Sasaki, Tribological Properties of Coating Films Synthesised by Laser Assisted Plasma Spraying, Surf. Eng., 1997, 13(3), p 238-242
J.H. Ouyang and S. Sasaki, Microstructure and Tribological Characteristics of ZrO2-Y2O3 Ceramic Coatings Deposited by Laser-Assisted Plasma Hybrid Spraying, Tribol. Int., 2002, 35(4), p 255-264
S.O. Chwa and A. Ohmori, Microstructures of ZrO2-8 wt% Y2O3 Coatings Prepared by a Laser Hybrid Spraying Technique, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2002, 153(2-3), p 304-312
S.O. Chwa and A. Ohmori, Thermal Diffusivity and Erosion Resistance of ZrO2-8 wt% Y2O3 Coatings Prepared by a Laser Hybrid Spraying Technique, Thin Solid Films, 2002, 415(1-2), p 160-166
Z. Zhou, H. Shirasawa, N. Eguchi, and A. Ohmori, Microstructures and Characterization of Zirconia-Yttria Coatings Formed in Laser and Hybrid Spray Process, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 1999, 8(3), p 405-413
G. Antou, G. Montavon, F. Hlawka, A. Cornet, C. Coddet, and F. Machi, Evaluation of Modifications Induced on Pore Network and Structure of Partially Stabilized Zirconia Manufactured by Hybrid Plasma Spray Process, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2004, 180-181, p 627-632
G. Antou, G. Montavon, F. Hlawka, A. Cornet, C. Coddet, and F. Machi, Modification of Ceramic Thermal Spray Deposit Microstructures Implementing In Situ Laser Remelting, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2003, 172(2-3), p 279-290
N. Serres, F. Hlawka, S. Costil, C. Langlade, F. Machi, and A. Cornet, Combined Plasma Spray and In Situ Laser Melting Treatment of NiCrBSi Powder, J. Opto. Adv. Mater., 2010, 12(3), p 505-510
N. Serres, F. Hlawka, S. Costil, C. Langlade, and F. Machi, Microstructures of Metallic NiCrBSi Coatings Manufactured Via Hybrid Plasma Spray Process, Thermal Spray: Global Solutions for Future Applications, B.R. Marple, A. Agarwal, M.M. Hyland, Y.C. Lau, C.J. Li, R.S. Lima, and G. Montavon, Ed., DVS-Berichte, Singapore, 2010, p 283-288
N. Serres, F. Hlawka, S. Costil, C. Langlade, and F. Machi, Corrosion Behavior of NiCrBSi Alloy Coatings Manufactured Via In Situ Plasma Spray-Laser Re-Melting Process, Thermal Spray: Global Solutions for Future Applications, B.R. Marple, A. Agarwal, M.M. Hyland, Y.C. Lau, C.J. Li, R.S. Lima, and G. Montavon, Ed., DVS-Berichte, Singapore, 2010, p 662-667
I. Etsion, State of the Art in Laser Surface Texturing, J. Tribol., 2005, 127, p 248-253
R. Ranjan, D.N. Lambeth, M. Tromel, P. Goglia, and Y. Li, Laser Texturing for Low‐Flying‐Height Media, J. Appl. Phys., 1991, 69(8), p 5745-5747
L. Blunt and S. Xiao, The Use of Surface Segmentation Methods to Characterise Laser Zone Surface Structure on Hard Disc Drives, Wear, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2010.06.014
A. Kovalchenko, O. Ajayi, A. Erdemir, G. Fenske, and I. Etsion, The Effect of Laser Surface Texturing on Transitions in Lubrication Regimes During Unidirectional Sliding Contact, Tribol. Int., 2005, 38(3), p 219-225
L. Rapoport, A. Moshkovich, V. Perfilyev, A. Gedanken, Y. Koltypin, E. Sominski, G. Halperin, and I. Etsion, Wear Life and Adhesion of Solid Lubricant Films on Laser-Textured Steel Surfaces, Wear, 2009, 267(5-8), p 1203-1207
Y. Wan and D.S. Xiong, The Effect of Laser Surface Texturing on Frictional Performance of Face Seal, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2008, 197(1-3), p 96-100
I. Etsion and G. Halperin, A Laser Surface Textured Hydrostatic Mechanical Seal, Seal. Technol., 2003, 3, p 6-10
C. Vincent, G. Monteil, T. Barriere, and J.C. Gelin, Texturation de surface par laser sur un matériau hétérogène, 18 eme Congrés Français de Mécanique, Grenoble, France, 2007 (in French)
M.R.H. Knowles, G. Rutterford, D. Karnakis, and A. Ferguson, Micromachining of Metals, Ceramics and Polymers Using Nanosecond Lasers, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2007, 33(1-2), p 95-102
G. Lallemand, G. Jacrot, E. Cicala, and D.F. Grevey, Grooving by Nd:YAG Laser Treatment, J. Mater. Proc. Technol., 2000, 99(1-3), p 32-37
A.A. Voevodin and J.S. Zabinsk, Laser Surface Texturing for Adaptative Solid Lubrication, Wear, 2006, 261, p 1285-1292
L. Tunna, W. O’Neill, A. Khan, and C. Sutcliffe, Analysis of Laser Micro Drilled Holes Through Aluminium for Micro-Manufacturing Applications, Opt. Lasers Eng., 2005, 43, p 937-950
J. Qi, K.L. Wang, and Y.M. Zhu, A Study on the Laser Marking Process of Stainless Steel, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2003, 139(1-3), p 273-276
L.M. Vilhena, M. Sedlaček, B. Podgornik, J. Vižintin, A. Babnik, and J. Možina, Surface Texturing by Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser, Tribol. Int., 2009, 42(10), p 1496-1504
A. Soveja, “Modélisation du processus de texturation par faisceau laser: approches expérimentale et numérique”, PhD Thesis, Université de Bourgone, 2007 (in French)
B.S. Yilbas, Parametric Study to Improve Laser Hole Drilling Process, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 1997, 70(1-3), p 264-273
A. Soveja, E. Cicala, D. Grevey, and J.M. Jouvard, Optimisation of TA6V Alloy Surface Laser Texturing Using an Experimental Design Approach, Opt. Lasers Eng., 2008, 46, p 671-678
C.A. Biffi, N. Lecis, B. Previtali, M. Vedani, and G.M. Vimercati, Fiber Laser Microdrilling of Titanium and Its Effect on Material Microstructure, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2010, doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2918-6
H.C. Man, Q. Wang, and X. Guo, Laser Surface Microdrilling of Ti and Laser Gas Nitrided Ti for Enhancing Fixation of Dental Implants, Opt. Lasers Eng., 2010, 48, p 583-588
A. Lamraoui, S. Costil, C. Langlade, and C. Coddet, Laser Surface Texturing (LST) Treatment Before Thermal Spraying: A New Process to Improve the Substrate-Coating Adherence, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 205(1), p S164-S167
A. Lamraoui, Rapport region December 2009, LERMPS-UTBM, Belfort, France, Unpublished Work, 2009 (in French)
A. Lamraoui, Rapport Region November 2010, LERMPS-UTBM, Belfort, France, Unpublished Work, 2010 (in French)
I.A. Almeida, W. de Rossi, M.S.F. Lima, J.R. Beretta, G.E.C. Nogueira, N.U. Wetter, and N.D. Vieira, Jr., Optimization of Titanium Cutting by Factorial Analysis of Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser Parameters, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2006, 179(1-3), p 105-110
D. Triantafyllidis, L. Li, and F.H. Stott, Crack-Free Densification of Ceramics by Laser Surface Treatment, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 201, p 3163-3173
L. Bradley, L. Li, and F.H. Stot, Flame-Assisted Laser Surface Treatment of Refractory Materials for Crack-Free Densification, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, 278(1-2), p 204-212
C. Batista, A. Portinha, R.M. Ribeiro, V. Teixeira, M.F. Costa, and C.R. Oliveira, Surface Laser-Glazing of Plasma-Sprayed Thermal Barrier Coatings, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2005, 247(1-4), p 313-319
R. Krishnan, S. Dash, C. Babu Rao, R.V. Subba Rao, A.K. Tyagi, and B. Raj, Laser Induced Structural and Microstructural Transformations of Plasma Sprayed Al2O3 Coatings, Scr. Mater., 2001, 45(6), p 693-700
R. Krishnan, S. Dash, R. Kesavamoorthy, C. Babu Rao, A.K. Tyagi, and B. Raj, Laser Surface Modification and Characterization of Air Plasma Sprayed Alumina Coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 200(8), p 2791-2799
G. Antou, G. Montavon, F. Hlawka, A. Cornet, C. Coddet, and F. Machi, Modification of Thermal Barrier Coating Architecture by In Situ Laser Remelting, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2006, 26(16), p 3583-3597
H. Pokhmurska, B. Wielage, T. Lampke, T. Grund, M. Student, and N. Chervinska, Post-Treatment of Thermal Spray Coatings on Magnesium, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2008, 202(18), p 4515-4524
E. Fernández, J.R. García, J.M. Cuetos, and V. Higuera, Behaviour of Laser Treated Cr, Ni Coatings in the Oxidative Atmosphere of a Steam Boiler, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2005, 195(1), p 1-7
M. Laribi, N. Mesrati, A.B. Vannes, and D. Treheux, Adhesion and Residual Stresses Determination of Thermally Sprayed Molybdenum on Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2003, 166(2-3), p 206-212
N. Serres, F. Hlawka, S. Costil, C. Langlade, and F. Machi, Corrosion Properties of In Situ Laser Remelted NiCrBSi Coatings Comparison With Hard Chromium Coatings, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211(1), p 133-140
R. González, M. Cadenas, R. Fernández, J.L. Cortizo, and E. Rodríguez, Wear Behaviour of Flame Sprayed NiCrBSi Coating Remelted by Flame or by Laser, Wear, 2007, 262(3-4), p 301-307
Z. Bergant and J. Gru, Quality Improvement of Flame Sprayed, Heat Treated, and Remelted NiCrBSi Coatings, J. Therm. Spray Technol., 2009, 18(3), p 380-391
S. Abdi and S. Lebaili, Alternative to Chromium, a Hard Alloy Powder NiCrBCSi (Fe) Coatings Thermally Sprayed on 60CrMn4 Steel. Phase and Comportements, Phys. Procedia, 2009, 2(3), p 1005-1014
J.F. Li, L. Li, and F.H. Stott, Comparison of Volumetric and Surface Heating Sources in the Modeling of Laser Melting of Ceramic Materials, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 2004, 47(6-7), p 1159-1174
C. Li, Y. Wang, S. Wang, and L. Guo, Laser Surface Remelting of Plasma-Sprayed Nanostructured Al2O3-13 wt%TiO2, Coatings on Magnesium Alloy, J. Alloys Compd., 2010, 503, p 127-132
Y. Wang, C. Li, L. Guo, and W. Tia, Laser Remelting of Plasma Sprayed Nanostructured Al2O3-TiO2 Coatings at Different Laser Power, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 204(21-22), p 3559-3566
J. Iwaszko, Surface Remelting Treatment of Plasma-Sprayed Al2O3 + 13 wt% TiO2 Coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 201(6), p 3443-3451
L. Bradley, L. Li, and F.H. Stott, Characteristics of the Microstructures of Alumina-Based Refractory Materials Treated With CO and Diode Lasers, Appl. Surf. Sci., 1999, 138-139, p 233-239
A. Ibrahim, H. Salem, and S. Sedky, Excimer Laser Surface Treatment of Plasma Sprayed Alumina-13% Titania Coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 203(23), p 3579-3589
M.F. Morks, C.C. Berndt, Y. Durandet, M. Brandt, and J. Wang, Microscopic Observation of Laser Glazed Yttria-Stabilized Zirconia Coatings, Appl. Surf. Sci., 2010, 256, p 6213-6218
S.O. Chwa and A. Ohmori, The Influence of Surface Roughness of Sprayed Zirconia Coatings on Laser Treatment, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2001, 148(1), p 87-94
V. Cannillo, L. Lusvarghi, A. Sola, and M. Barletta, Post-Deposition Laser Treatment of Plasma Sprayed Titania-Hydroxyapatite Functionally Graded Coatings, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2009, 29(15), p 3147-3158
J. Hanchi and N.S. Eiss, Jr., Dry Sliding Friction and Wear of Short Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) at Elevated Temperatures, Wear, 1997, 203-204, p 380-386
V. Hnatowicz, V. Havranek, J. Bocan, A. Mackova, J. Vacik, and V. Svorcik, Modification of Poly(ether ether ketone) by Ion Irradiation, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B, 2008, 266(2), p 283-287
Q. Wang, Q. Xue, H. Liu, W. Shen, and J. Xu, The Effect of Particle Size of Nanometer ZrO2 on the Tribological Behaviour of PEEK, Wear, 1996, 198, p 216-219
T. Palathai, J. Tharajak, and N. Sombatsompop, Hardness, Adhesion Index and Microstructure of PEEK Coating on Al or Fe Substrate by LVOF Flame Spray, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2008, 485(1-2), p 66-73
Z.P. Lu and K. Friedrich, On Sliding Friction and Wear of PEEK and Its Composites, Wear, 1995, 181-183, p 624-631
P.J. Rae, E.N. Brown, and E.B. Orler, The Mechanical Properties of Poly(ether-ether-ketone) (PEEK) With Emphasis on the Large Compressive Strain Response, Polymer, 2007, 48, p 598-615
Polymer Data File: Polyether Ether Ketone—PEEK, Tangram Technology Ltd., http://www.tangram.co.uk/TI-Polymer-PEEK.html, Accessed 31 October 2010
PEEK Spec Datasheet, San Diego Plastics Inc., http://www.sdplastics.com/peek.html, Accessed 31 October 2010
G. Zhang, S. Leparoux, H. Liao, and C. Coddet, Microwave Sintering of Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Based Coatings Deposited on Metallic Substrate, Scr. Mater., 2006, 55, p 621-624
I. Corni, N. Neumann, S. Novak, K. König, P. Veronesi, Q. Chen, M.P. Ryan, and A.R. Boccaccini, Electrophoretic Deposition of PEEK-Nano Alumina Composite Coatings on Stainless Steel, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2009, 203, p 1349-1359
K. Patel, C.S. Doyle, D. Yonekura, and B.J. James, Effect of Surface Roughness Parameters on Thermally Sprayed PEEK Coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2010, 204, p 3567-3572
I. Corni, N. Neumann, D. Eifler, and A.R. Boccaccini, Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Coatings on Stainless Steel by Electrophoretic Deposition, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2008, 10(6), p 559-564
H. Liao, E. Beche, and C. Coddet, On the Microstructure of Thermally Sprayed ‘PEEK’ Polymer, Thermal Spray: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century, C. Coddet, Ed., ASM International, Nice, France, 1998, p 25-29
A. Soveja, P. Sallamand, H. Liao, and S. Costil, Improvement of Flame Spraying PEEK Coating Characteristics Using Lasers, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2011, 211(1), p 12-23
L. Simonin and H. Liao, Characterization of Flame-Sprayed PEEK Coatings by FTIR-ATR, DSC and Acoustic Microscopy, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 2000, 283, p 153-162
H. Liao, C. Coddet, and L. Simonin, Mechanical Properties of Thermal Spray PEEK Coatings, Thermal Spray 2001: New Surface for a New Millennium, C.C. Berndt, K.A. Khor, and E.F. Lugscheider, Ed., ASM International, Singapore, 2001, p 315-320
J. Li, C. Hanlin Liao, and C. Coddet, Friction and Wear Behavior of Flame-Sprayed PEEK Coatings, Wear, 2002, 252, p 824-831
H. Li, S. Costil, V. Barnier, R. Oltra, O. Heintz, and C. Coddet, Surface Modifications Induced by Nanosecond Pulsed Nd:YAG Laser Irradiation of Metallic Substrates, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 201, p 1383-1392
G. Zhang, W.Y. Li, M. Cherigui, C. Zhang, H. Liao, J.M. Bordes, and C. Coddet, Structures and Tribological Performances of PEEK (Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone)-Based Coatings Designed for Tribological Application, Prog. Org. Coat., 2007, 60, p 39-44
K.H. Tan, C.K. Chua, K.F. Leong, C.M. Cheah, P. Cheang, M.S. Abu Bakar, and S.W. Cha, Scaffold Development Using Selective Laser Sintering of Polyetheretherketone-Hydroxyapatite Biocomposite Blends, Biomaterials, 2003, 24, p 3115-3123
G. Zhang, H. Liao, H. Yu, S. Costil, S.G. Mhaisalkar, J.M. Bordes, and C. Coddet, Deposition of PEEK Coatings Using a Combined Flame Spraying-Laser Remelting Process, Surf. Coat. Technol., 2006, 201, p 243-249
J.M.P. Coelho, M.A. Abreu, and C.F. Rodrigues, Methodologies for Determining Thermoplastic Films Optical Parameters at 10.6 μm Laser Wavelength, Polym. Test, 2004, 23, p 307-312
L. Dosser, K. Hix, K. Hartke, R. Vaia, and M. Li, Transmission Welding of Carbon Nanocomposites With Direct-Diode and Nd:YAG Solid State Lasers, Photon Processing in Microelectronics and Photonics, January 26-29, 2004 (San Jose, CA), SPIE, Vol 5339, 2004, p 465-474
A. Buchman, H. Dodiuk, M. Rota, and J. Zahavi, Preadhesion Treatment of Thermoplastic Adherends Using Excimer Laser, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 1991, 11(3), p 144-149
E. Wurzberg, A. Buchman, E. Zylberstein, Y. Holdengraber, and H. Dodiuk, Preadhesion Laser Surface Treatment of Polycarbonate and Polyetherimide, Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., 1990, 10(4), p 254-262
Acknowledgments
The research works presented as study cases in this review were supported by Franche-Comté, Alsace and Bourgogne French regions, CAPM (Communauté d’Agglomération du Pays de Montbéliard), ADEME (Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Energie), and Education French Ministry.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Garcia-Alonso, D., Serres, N., Demian, C. et al. Pre-/During-/Post-Laser Processes to Enhance the Adhesion and Mechanical Properties of Thermal-Sprayed Coatings with a Reduced Environmental Impact. J Therm Spray Tech 20, 719–735 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-011-9629-x
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11666-011-9629-x