Abstract
Estimation of terrestrial biomass depends critically on reliable information about wood specific gravity of forest trees. In recent years, wood specific gravity has become more important when exploring the universality of functional traits of plants and estimating their global carbon stocks. To estimate their specific gravity, wood samples were collected from a total of 34 tree species, 30 from lower elevations and 4 from upper elevations in the Garhwal Himalayas, India. The results show that the average wood specific gravity was 0.631 (ranging between 0.275 ± 0.01 and 0.845 ± 0.03) for the species at lower elevations and 0.727 (ranging between 0.628 ± 0.02 and 0.865 ± 0.02) for the upper elevations. The average wood specific gravity for the upper elevation species was 9.6% greater than that for the species at lower elevations. Aegle marmelos among the lower elevation species and Quercus leucotrichophora among the upper elevation species had the highest wood specific gravity, which were 0.845 ± 0.03 and 0.865 ± 0.02, respectively.
Article PDF
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Araújo T M, Higuchi N, de Carvalho Júnior J A. 1999. Comparison of formulae for biomass content determination in a tropical rain forest site in the state of Pará, Brazil. Forest Ecol Manage, 117: 43–52
Baker T R, Phillips O L, Malhi Y, Almeida S, Arroyo L, DiFiore A, Erwin T, Higuchi N, Killeen T J, Laurance S G, Laurance W F, Lewis S L, Monteagudo A, Neill D A, Vargas P N, Pitman N C A, Silva J N M, Martínez R V. 2004a. Increasing biomass in Amazonian forest plots. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B, 359: 353–365
Baker T R, Phillips O L, Malhi Y, Almeida S, Arroyo L, Di-Fiore A, Erwin T, Killeen T J, Laurance S G, Laurance W F, Lewis S L, Lloyd J, Monteagudo A, Neill D A, Patiño S, Pitman N C A, Silva J N M, Martínez R V. 2004b. Variation in wood density determines spatial patterns in Amazonian forest biomass. Global Change Biol, 10: 545–562
Baker T R, Phillips O L, Laurance W F, Pitman N C A, Almeida S, Arroyo L, DiFiore A, Erwin T, Higuchi N, Killeen T J, Laurance S G, Nascimento H, Monteagudo A, Neill D A, Silva J N M, Malhi Y, Gonzalez G L, Peacock J, Quesada C A, Lewis S L, Lloyd J. 2009. Do species traits determine patterns of wood production in Amazonian forests? Biogeosciences, 6: 297–307
Brown S, Lugo A E. 1992. Aboveground biomass estimates for tropical moist forests of the Brazilian Amazon. Interciencia, 17: 8–18
Brown S. 1997. Estimating Biomass and Biomass Change of Tropical Forests: A Primer. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Forestry Paper 134. Rome: FAO
Brown S L, Schroeder P, Kern J S. 1999. Spatial distribution of biomass in forests of the eastern USA. Forest Ecol Manage, 123: 81–90
Chave J, Condit R, Aguilar S, Hernandez A, Lao S, Perez R. 2004. Error propagation and scaling for tropical forest biomass estimates. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B, 359: 409–420
Chave J, Andalo C, Brown S, Cairns M A, Chambers J Q, Eamus D, Fölster H, Fromard F, Higuchi N, Kira T, Lescure J P, Nelson B W, Ogawa H, Puig H, Riera B, Yamakura T. 2005. Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145: 87–99
Chave J, Coomes D, Jansen S, Lewis S L, Swenson N G, Zanne A E. 2009. Towards a worldwide wood economics spectrum. Ecol Lett, 12: 351–366
Chowdhury K A, Ghosh S S. 1958. Indian Woods: Their Identification, Properties and Uses. vol. 1. Delhi, India: Manager of Publications
Culmsee H, Leuschner C, Moser G, Pitopang R. 2010. Forest aboveground biomass along an elevational transect in Sulawesi, Indonesia, and the role of Fagaceae in tropical montane rain forests. J Biogeogr, 37: 960–974
Cummings D L, Kauffman J B, Perry D A, Hughes R F. 2002. Aboveground biomass and structure of rainforests in the southwestern Brazilian Amazon. Forest Ecol Manage, 163: 293–307
Fearnside P M. 1997. Wood density for estimating forest biomass in Brazilian Amazonia. Forest Ecol Manage, 90: 59–87
Ghosh S S, Rao K R, Purkayastha S K. 1963. Indian Woods, Their Identification, Properties and Uses. vol. 2. Delhi, India: Manager of Publications, 13–49
Keeling H C, Phillips O L. 2007. The global relationship between forest productivity and biomass. Global Ecol Biogeogr, 16: 618–631
Ketterings Q M, Coe R, van Noordwijk M, Ambagau Y, Palm C A. 2001. Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests. Forest Ecol Manage, 146: 199–209
King D A, Davies S J, Tan S, Noor N S M. 2006. The role of wood density and stem support costs in the growth and mortality of tropical trees. J Ecol, 94: 670–680
Kumar M, Sharma C M, Rajwar G S. 2009. Energy budget of traditional hill agroecosystem along altitudinal gradient in Garhwal Himalaya, India. World J Agri Sci, 5(6): 729–736
Larson P R. 1969. Wood formation and the concept of wood quality. Bulletin No. 74. School of Forestry, Yale University, New Haven
Magcale-Macandog D B. 2004. Comparative evaluation of different approaches to estimate aboveground biomass and biomass density of tropical forests in Southeast Asia: a review. Phil Agric Sci, 87: 61–75
Malhi Y, Wood D, Baker T R, Wright J, Phillips O L, Cochrane T, Meir P, Chave J, Almeida S, Arroyo L, Higuchis N, Killeen T J, Laurance S G, Laurance W F, Lewiss S L, Monteagudo A, Neill D A, Vargas P N, Pitman N C A, Quesada C A, Salomao R, Silva J N M, Lezama A T, Terborgh J, Martinez R V, Vinceti B. 2006. The regional variation of aboveground live biomass in old-growth Amazonian forests. Global Change Biol, 12: 1107–1138
Mani S, Parthasarathy N. 2007. Above-ground biomass estimation in ten tropical dry evergreen forest sites of peninsular India. Biomass Bioenergy, 31: 284–290
Muller-Landau H C. 2004. Interspecific and inter-site variation in wood specific gravity of tropical trees. Biotropica, 36(1): 20–32
Nascimento H E M, Laurance W F. 2004. Biomass dynamics in Amazonian forest fragments. Ecol Appl, 14: S127–S138
Nelson B W, Mesquita R, Pereira J L G, de Souza S G A, Batista G T, Couto L B. 1999. Allometric regressions for improved estimate of secondary forest biomass in the central Amazon. Forest Ecol Manage, 117: 149–167
Nogueira E M, Nelson B W, Fearnside P M. 2005. Wood density in dense forest in central Amazonia, Brazil. Forest Ecol Manage, 208: 261–286
Purkayastha S K. 1982. Indian Woods: Their Identification, Properties and Uses. vol. 4. Delhi, India: The Controller of Publications, 172
Rajput S S, Shukla N K, Gupta V K. 1985. Specific gravity of Indian timber. J Timber Dev Assoc India, 31(3): 12–41
Raturi R D, Chauhan L, Gupta S, Vijendra R R. 2002. Indian Woods: Their Identification, Properties and Uses. vol. 6. Dehra Dun, India: ICFRE Publication, 199
Rigatto A T. 2004. Variation in strength in pine timber. S Afr J Sci, 59: 653–683
Slik J W F. 2006. Estimating species-specific wood density from the genus average in Indonesian trees. J Trop Ecol, 22: 481–482
Smith D M. 1954. Maximum moisture content method for determining specific gravity of small wood samples. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory Report No. 2014, Madison and Wisconsin
Swenson N G, Enquist B J. 2008. The relationship between stem and branch wood specific gravity and the ability of each measure to predict leaf area. Amer J Bot, 95: 516–519
van Gelder H A, Poorter L, Sterck F J. 2006. Wood mechanics, allometry, and life-history variation in a tropical rain forest tree community. New Phytol, 171: 367–378
Wiemann M C, Williamson G B. 1988. Extreme radial changes in wood specific gravity in some tropical pioneers. Wood Fiber Sci, 20: 344–349
Woodcock D W, Shier A D. 2003. Does canopy position affect wood specific gravity in temperate forest trees? Ann Bot, 91: 529–537
Zobel B J, Jett J B. 1995. Genetics of Wood Production. Heidelbery/New York: Spinger-Verlag
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sheikh, M.A., Kumar, M. & Bhat, J.A. Wood specific gravity of some tree species in the Garhwal Himalayas, India. For. Stud. China 13, 225–230 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-011-0310-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11632-011-0310-8