Abstract
In this study, we investigated the roles of the plant hormones indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and gibberellin (GA) in regulating Pinus massoniana Lamb. plantlet regeneration during long-term in vitro subculture. Six generations (1st, 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th and 40th with 40 days for each transfer cycle) of subcultured shoots derived from mature and juvenile explants were characterised for their different rooting capacities. In the present experiment, shoots were subcultured on rooting medium containing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA), naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) or gibberellin (GA) inhibitor (paclobutrazol, PBZ). In addition, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was used to analyse endogenous hormone levels in shoots developed on medium with low concentrations of NAA. The concentration of endogenous IAA was highest in the 20th generation shoots, which also exhibited the strongest rooting ability. However, the highest GA concentration was observed in the 40th generation shoots, which exhibited a poor rooting capacity. For shoots subcultured for 40 generations, incubation on rooting medium containing IAA caused an enhanced root number, shoot length and survival rate. This suggested that the effects of IAA on shoot and root formation were positive. PBZ promoted plantlet regeneration from in vitro cultures but impaired shoot elongation at high levels. Furthermore, PBZ improved performance of in vitro cultures after long-term (3 to 4 y) subculture. These results suggest the inhibitory role of a high endogenous GA level in plant regeneration and the use of appropriate levels of PBZ for plant regeneration of P. massoniana.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Conifers belonging to the genus Pinus are represented by 116 varieties worldwide. Numerous reports have shown growing global interest in Pinus species due to its high commercial value (Pullman et al.2015; Beltran et al.2016). Pinus massoniana Lamb. is cultivated for the production of timber and natural resin (Zhu et al.2010), resulting in its important role in the afforestation of southern China where P. massoniana breeding programmes were initiated (Ding et al.2006). Unfortunately, in comparison to that of herbaceous plants, the breeding of trees time consuming where only after it reaches maturity can the economic value of a tree be evaluated (Merkle and Dean 2000; Von Aderkas and Bonga 2000). Propagation by cutting of adult P. massoniana trees has not been established due to poor rooting (Ji et al.1996). Therefore, micropropagation has been effectively used for high-quality, disease-free and uniform regeneration of planting materials. The regeneration of plantlets from juvenile materials of P. massoniana by in vitro micropropagation has been previously reported (Zhu et al.2010); however, the in vitro regeneration of selected adult trees is very difficult due to the difficulties in axillary shoot outgrowth and/or adventitious rooting (Yao and Wang 2016).
Wang and Yao (2019a) reported that physiological ageing significantly affects the in vitro plant regeneration performance, and plant materials from mature trees can be rejuvenated following five successive graftings, contributing to the improvement of in vitro regeneration capacity of adult P. massoniana trees. Similar studies on the enhanced clonal propagation of mature trees due to rejuvenation by successive grafting, subculturing and/or pruning have been reported (Bonga 1987; Bonga and Von Adrekas 1993; Wendling et al.2014; Heide 2019). The in vitro regeneration of plantlets from 26-y-old P. massoniana trees has been established using rejuvenated explants (Wang and Yao 2019b). However, the capacity of plantlet regeneration decreased after long-term subculture, which prevented the commercial development for P. massoniana. Increased number of subcultures is closely related to physiological changes in regenerated plants, (Su 2000; Shi et al.2007). However, the physiological mechanisms associated with long-term subculture and declining regeneration of Pinus species are not clearly understood.
Plant hormones play important roles in the plantlet regeneration of trees. Previous research showed a correlation between rooting capacity and endogenous levels of auxin [indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)], zeatin riboside (ZR), abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellins (GA), in successive generations of plants (Huang et al.2007). Auxin plays an important role in regulating in vitro shoot growth and adventitious rooting (Himanen et al. 2004). However, De Smet et al. (2003) and Aloni et al. (2006) found that other plant hormones, such as cytokinin and ABA, modulate the process as well through auxin-dependent means. The role that GAs play in plantlet regeneration is largely unknown.
GAs regulate the developmental processes of plants, including shoot elongation, flowering, seed/plant development and various metabolism and signalling pathways (Olszewski et al.2002; Hedden 2003; Sun and Gubler 2004; Swain and Singh 2005). The role of GAs in root elongation during plant regeneration has been observed in several studies. Fu and Harberd (2003) suggest that GA influences the expansion of cells from the region of root elongation through destabilizing the GA-repressing DELLA proteins. Most recently, GA appears to promote cell expansion of primary roots (Ubeda-Tomas et al.2008). However, Mauriat et al. (2014) suggest that GA inhibits root growth. Eriksson et al. (2000) observed inhibitory effects of GA on root formation during adventitious root development. Consequently, the inhibitor of GA biosynthesis, paclobutrazol (PBZ), has been used as a promotive regulator of root development in plants (Watson 1996; Watson 2004; Salari et al.2017; Kamran et al.2018).
In recent years, we have established in vitro culture systems of 257 genotypes from mature P. massoniana and have accomplished the in vitro regeneration of plantlets for some selected genotypes (Wang and Yao 2017). However, the rooting rate is generally quite poor and varies among genotypes. To clarify the impact of long-term subculture on the efficiency of plantlet regeneration, subcultured shoots from one P. massoniana genotype, GLM-8, were used as test materials in this study. GLM-8 was selected from the ‘Tongmian’ variety of P. massoniana, which is widely distributed throughout southern China has superior growth properties and history of micropropagation. In addition, comparison of the influences of long-term subculture and exogenous hormones on in vitro culture was also conducted. Accordingly, the effects of IAA and GA on plantlet regeneration during the course of successive subcultures in P. massoniana were investigated with regard to the variations of endogenous hormone levels among regenerated plants from different subculture generations.
Materials and Methods
Plant materials
Elite trees from 26-y-old superior stands of the ‘Tongmian’ [TM] variety of P. massoniana were selected for this research where new shoots from these trees were first grafted to 1-y-old rootstocks to obtain rejuvenated materials (Wang and Yao 2019a). Grafted plants were pruned on top to produce axillary shoots when they reached approximately 0.5 m to produce new shoots to be used for the next round of grafting. After five repeated graftings cycles were performed, nodal segments taken from the new shoots were used as explants, which were derived directly from shoots of the original source trees and are referred to below as mature explants. In total, the mature explants of five genotypes were collected from the same stands. Considering the differences in micropropagation capacity among genotypes (Yao et al.2016), subcultured shoots from the same genotype, GLM-8, with robust proliferation and rooting ability were chosen as the research materials to demonstrate the influence of long-term subculture on the regeneration capacity. Therefore to support the results from one genotype, GLM-8, juvenile plant materials from different genotypes (somatic embryo-derived plants referred to as somaplants obtained from immature seeds of 26-yr-old TM source trees) were simultaneously obtained and used as the reference material in this experiment. The technique for somatic embryo production has been described previously (Yang et al. 2011a, b). Before experiments were initiated, axillary buds of 10-mo somaplants were grafted once using the same technique as described above. Explants collected from grafted somaplants are referred to below as juvenile explants. Tissue disinfection and culture conditions were performed with the methods described in Yao and Wang (2016). For successive transfers, shoots were subcultured once every 35 to 40 d, for a total of 40 generations. Shoots developed on explants from the 1st, 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th and 40th subcultures were excised for root induction. Excised shoots ≥ 20 mm were cultured on half-strength modified Murashige and Skoog (MS) (Murashige and Skoog 1962) medium supplemented according to Yao and Wang (2016) with 58.5 mM sucrose, 8 g·L−1 agar and exogenous hormones, including 1.2 μM naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), 1 to 4 μM IAA or 2 to 8 μM paclobutrazol (PBZ). Explants were cultured under light (illumination intensity: 35 μM·m−2·sec−1; 12 h photoperiod) at a constant temperature of 27 °C.
Endogenous hormone determinationEndogenous IAA, ZR, ABA and GA (GA1 + 3 and GA4 + 7) from in vitro shoots of different subculture cycles were sequentially determined using an indirect ELISA technique at the Plant Hormones Research Institute (China Agricultural University) as described by Yang et al. (2001). Prior to the initiation of root induction, 2 g shoot tips, 2 to 3 cm in length, were excised from in vitro shoots of the subculture cycle tested for the determination of endogenous hormone levels. To homogenise the materials, the samples were ground to a powder after being placed in liquid nitrogen and extraction performed using cold 80% (v/v) methanol with 1 mmol·L−1 butylated hydroxytoluene overnight at 4 °C. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g (4 °C) for 20 min, the extracts were collected and passed through a C18 Sep-Pak cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA) and then dried under N2. To determine the levels of IAA, ABA, ZR and GAs, residues were dissolved in 0.01 mol·L−1 PBS and analysed by ELISA as described above. The results are expressed as the means of three replicates. In total, 72 g (2 g × 3 replicates×6 subculture generations×2 explant sources) shoot tips were sampled during long-term subculture for the determination of endogenous hormones before the initiation of root induction.
Experiments on the influences of exogenous hormones:
The 1st stage To assess the relationships between the plant regeneration capacity and endogenous hormones during successive subculture cycles, in vitro shoots derived from both mature and juvenile explants at different transfer cycles (1st, 5th, 10th, 20th, 30th and 40th) were sequentially cultured on rooting medium from 2014 to 2018 (Figs. 1 and 2). Due to the recalcitrance of P. massoniana rooting in vitro, the supplementation of exogenous hormones in rooting medium is necessary to achieve rooted shoots. Low concentrations of NAA were reportedly effective in inducing rooting of P. massoniana (Li et al.2009; Yang et al.2011b; Yao et al.2016). Therefore, 1.2 μM NAA was first added to the medium to induce rooting before analysing the relationships between rooting capacity and endogenous hormone levels in the subcultured shoots. A total of 600 subcultured shoots (10 shoots × 5 replicates × 6 subculture generations × 2 explant sources) were cultured on rooting medium at this stage.
The 2nd stage
To investigate the effects of exogenous IAA or PBZ on the regeneration of long-term subcultured P. massoniana shoots, the rooting performance of in vitro shoots from mature explants after 40 subculture cycles treated with medium containing 1 to 4 μM IAA and 2 to 8 μM PBZ were investigated (Table 1). To achieve new insight into the role of IAA or PBZ in regulating plantlet regeneration, 1.2 μM NAA was only added to the control treatment without the addition of IAA and PBZ. A total of 350 subcultured shoots (10 shoots × 5 replicates × 7 hormones treatments × 1 subculture generation×1 explant source) were cultured on rooting medium at this stage.
The 3rd stage
Based on the furtherly observed results for effects of 4~6 μM PBZ on plantlet regeneration of P. massoniana (data not shown in this paper), there were no significant differences in shoot and root growth among 4, 5 and 6 μM PBZ treatments. Hence, to facilitate the application of PBZ in the practice, 5.1 μM PBZ (i.e. 1.50 g, MW 294) was used to determine the role of exogenous PBZ in regulating P. massoniana plantlet regeneration. In vitro shoots derived from mature explants at the 10th, 20th, 30th and 40th subculture cycle were treated with medium containing 5.1 μM PBZ or 1.2 μM NAA. The concentration of PBZ used in the 3rd stage experiments was determined based on the observed results of the 2nd stage. A total of 400 subcultured shoots (10 shoots × 5 replicates × 2 hormones treatments × 4 subculture generations × 1 explant source) were cultured on rooting medium at this stage.
For all three stages, the number of axillary buds induced per shoot was recorded as the proliferation coefficient (PC) of the subcultured shoots from each subculture cycle. After rooting induction for 60 d, the shoot length, the number of shoots with visual adventitious roots and the number of roots ≥ 1 cm in length per rooted shoot were separately counted, and, along with the number of shoots with adventitious roots and the number of roots ≥ 1 cm in length per rooted shoot were used to calculate the rooting rate and root number, respectively. The survival rate was expressed as the percentage of surviving plantlets among the total plantlets transplanted after three mo.
Statistical analysis
Linear relationships between adventitious rooting ability and endogenous hormone levels were analysed using linear regression analysis, and endogenous hormone levels or ratios (ng·g−1) were considered the dependent variable and rooting rate (%) the predictor variable. Regression analyses were carried out using the GLM procedure in SAS (SAS Institute Inc., North Tustin, CA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the factorial arrangement of treatments (hormone type/concentration and subculture times as factors), Duncan’s test (significant difference among subculture times or exogenous hormone treatments) (Duncan 1955) and t tests (significant difference between exogenous IAA or PBZ and NAA treatments within subculture time) were performed using the SPSS 19.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
Results
In vitro culture performance and endogenous hormone content The regeneration of subcultured shoots from six transfer cycles, originally derived from mature and juvenile explants, was compared with respect to the PC (Fig. 1A) and rooting rate (Fig. 1B). For shoot from both mature and juvenile explants, the PC increased and the rooting rate decreased after long-term subculture, and the lowest rooting rate and highest PC were observed in the 40th subculture cycle (Fig. 1). Considering the variation in regeneration performance of in vitro shoots during long-term subculture, changes in PC and rooting rate of subcultured shoots from mature explants were more responsive to the increase of subculture cycle than similar shoots from juvenile explants. Regarding mature explants, in vitro cultured shoots showed similar trends, characterised by a gradual increase in both shoot PC and rooting rate with increasing subculture times from the 1st to 20th cycle; however, after the 30th and 40th subculture cycles, the trend was strikingly different in this respect because the rooting rate significantly decreased, but a higher shoot PC was observed compared to that of the 20th cycle. Concerning the differences in rooting capacity of in vitro shoots from both explant sources during the course of successive subculture, the optimum number of subculture cycles was twenty, where the rooting rate was the highest. Long-term subculture (30 and 40 times) caused a decline in the rooting rate.
In endogenous hormone levels in subcultured shoots from both explant sources, differences in IAA, ABA, ZR and GA levels among tested cycles were significant (Fig. 2). For the juvenile explant source, the IAA level gradually decreased with increasing subcultures, and the lowest IAA level was observed after 30 and 40 subculture cycles. For the mature explant source, differences among the six subculture cycles were observed regarding the IAA level, which was elevated with increased subculture, reaching the peak at the 20th cycle and then decreased after the 40th subculture (Fig. 2A). The ZR concentration increased proportionally with subculture cycle from shoots derived from both explant sources, and the highest level was found in shoots subcultured 40 times, where the shoot PC was also relatively higher, and the rooting rate was the lowest among the six subculture cycles tested (Fig. 2B). For the ABA concentration, the highest values occurred at the 1st transfer, and then the value decreased, which became constant after the 5th (juvenile) or 10th (mature) subculture cycles (Fig. 2C). For both explant sources, the concentration of gibberellins (GA1 + 3, 4 + 7) was significantly higher in the shoots subcultured 30 to 40 times than in those subcultured 1 to 20 times (Fig. 2D).
In combination with the data from rooting rate and hormone level determination, the linear relationship between rooting rate and IAA or GA levels was greater than that between rooting rate and ZR or ABA levels (Fig. 3a~d). The most significant linear relationship was observed between the rooting rate and GA level for both explant sources, and the R2 values were 0.60 (mature) and 0.97 (juvenile) (Fig. 3d). Considering the interaction between hormones, a highly linear relationship was only found between the rooting rate and the IAA:GA ratio for both explant sources (mature, R2 = 0.96; juvenile, R2 = 0.92) (Fig. 3e), although the linear relationship between the rooting rate and IAA levels was not significant (mature, R2 = 0.16; juvenile, R2 = 0.79) (Fig. 3a).
Effects of exogenous hormones on plantlet regeneration To confirm the positive roles of exogenous IAA and PBZ on plantlet regeneration, shoots derived from mature explants subcultured 40 times with poor rooting ability were selected as test subjects in this part of the experiments. In comparison to the control, IAA did not influence the rooting rate but resulted in an increased root number, shoot length and survival rate (Table 1), resulting in 0.9 and 13.1 times higher shoot length and survival rate, respectively, from cultures on medium containing 4 μM IAA. Furthermore, 2 to 4 μM PBZ had a positive effect on plantlet regeneration (Table 1), while 8 μM PBZ decreased shoot length by 36.9%.
The differences in plantlet regeneration were analysed with shoots subcultured on NAA (1.2 μM), IAA (4 μM) or PBZ (4 μM) medium. As shown in Table 1 and Fig. 4, plant regeneration was enhanced by PBZ. IAA did not affect rooting rate; however, IAA had a positive effect on the growth of rooted shoots, resulting in increased root number, shoot length and survival rate. In particular, the formation of adventitious roots (root number per explant) was significantly promoted by IAA in comparison to PBZ.
Differences in plantlet regeneration of shoots treated with 5.1 μM PBZ or 1.2 μM NAA were compared among 10th, 20th, 30th and 40th subculture cycles. From Fig. 5, plant regeneration was significantly different among the four generations cultured on the PBZ or NAA medium. For both hormone treatments, the optimal effect of plantlet regeneration (rooting rate, root number, shoot length and survival rate) was observed in shoots of the 20th subculture cycle. In the 40th subculture, where the in vitro shoot rooting rate was the lowest (Fig. 1), there were no significant differences in rooting rate, shoot length or survival rate under PBZ treatment (Fig. 5A, C and D), but significant decreases in rooting capacity under NAA treatment were observed (Fig. 5) in comparison to that of the 30th cycle. For both the 30th and 40th transfer cycles, plantlet regeneration was more improved by PBZ than the NAA treatment within a subculture cycle, indicating that the decline of plantlet regeneration caused by long-term subculture was improved by PBZ supplementation to the rooting medium.
Discussion
This study confirms the relationship between rooting capacity and plant growth regulators and suggests that their role in regulating plantlet regeneration is different for successive subculture cycles. The roles of IAA and GA on rooting rate and root number were analysed individually. IAA did not affect rooting rate while it did promote root number. Root number increased for shoots subcultured 40 times (> 4 years in culture) whereas the rooting ability of shoots in vitro significantly declined during long-term subculture. These results are consistent with various studies that showed the root formation role of auxin in plants (Marhavý et al.2013; Cano et al.2018; Vaičiukynė et al.2019). To investigate the role of GA, exogenous PBZ was supplemented in the rooting medium resulting in enhancement of rooting rate and root number, contributing to increased plantlet formation (survival rate) of shoots subcultured in vitro 40 times. The exact role of GA on rooting rate and root number is not clear. However, it appears that GA plays positive and/or negative roles in regulating root development (growth and formation) dependent upon GA action and interaction with other growth regulators (Mauriat et al.2014; Fonouni-Farde et al.2017; Li et al.2018).
The role of GA in the growth of shoots and roots was found to be different in successive subculture cycles of P. massoniana. An increased rooting rate and a decrease in shoot length were observed when high concentrations of PBZ were tested. Furthermore, the role of auxin in plant regeneration was observed from the endogenous hormone analysis. There was a highly linear relationship between rooting rate and IAA/GA ratio, which may be related to the combined effects of IAA and GA on shoot and root growth by controlling the balance of their levels in P. massoniana cultures in vitro. Fu and Harberd (2003) described GA enhances root growth via inhibiting the hormone IAA. However, IAA and GA are generally reported to be promotive for the elongation of shoots (Hardtke 2003; Galavotti 2013). In the case of the promotive role of GA in shoot growth in the present study, it could be supported by the fact that a low GA level in shoots was determined after subculturing 40 times, and then growth of these shoots was reduced when a high concentration of PBZ was applied to the rooting medium.
Exogenous PBZ improved plantlet regeneration of long-term (approximately 3 to 4 y) subcultured shoots. The concentration of endogenous GA increased 34.7% in the 40th generation shoots with weak rooting ability (65.7%) compared with that in the 10th generation shoots with strong rooting ability (95.3%) for subcultured shoots; however, the endogenous IAA concentrations were nearly identical for the shoots of both subculture cycles tested. Hence, the role that GA plays was to inhibit rather than promote root development under a relatively low level of endogenous IAA. This was supported by the significantly enhanced performance of plantlet regeneration under PBZ treatment compared with that under NAA treatment for both the 30th and 40th subculture cycles. This role may be related to the capacity of cytokinin to modulate GA biosynthesis by inhibiting the expression of active GA (GA20 and GA3) synthetase, which are the main enzymes regulating active GA metabolism (Fonouni-Farde et al.2018). In this study, a linear relationship between ZR and GA levels (R2 = 0.70) was found irrespective of the non-linear relationship between ZR levels and rooting rate for subcultured shoots from a mature explant source. The level of ZR in the poor-rooting shoots subcultured 40 times was significantly higher than that in the robust-rooting shoots containing a lower level of GAs after subculturing 20 times. Marhavý et al. (2011) reported the inhibitory role of cytokinin in regulating root development. In addition, the role of cytokinin in promoting adventitious shoot growth was observed during in vitro culture of many plants (Schaller et al.2014; Waldie and Leyser 2018). In the present experiment, the best response of axillary buds (shoot proliferation coefficient) was found in shoots subcultured 30 to 40 times. This suggests that the interaction between ZR and GAs mainly contributes to shoot growth and not root growth for plantlet regeneration of subcultured shoots in mature P. massoniana trees.
The observed poor linear relationship between endogenous ABA levels and the rooting rate showed that ABA did not influence the rooting capacity of subcultured shoots during long-term subculture. Furthermore, the inhibition of root growth caused by the possible interaction between GA and ABA was weak, considering the poor linear relationships between the rooting rate and the ABA/GA ratio (R2 = 0.02 to 0.30), which was in contrast with the highly linear relationships observed between the rooting rate and the IAA/GA ratio (R2 = 0.92~0.96). The auxin:gibberellin ratio was lower in the long-term subcultured shoots (40th subculture cycle) than in the short-term subcultured shoots. Thus, the role of GA in hindering plantlet regeneration was indicated by the observed improvement of the rooting rate, root number, shoot length and survival rate of subcultured shoots cultured on the medium containing 5.1 μM PBZ compared with those of subcultured shoots cultured on the control medium without PBZ. In conclusion, the application of PBZ to the rooting medium resulted in increased root number and root and shoot growth, contributing to the enhancement of the plantlet survival rate in P. massoniana. In this study, we first report the improvement of declined plantlet regeneration caused by high endogenous GA levels in long-term subcultured shoots which contribute to the efficient propagation of selected genotypes in P. massoniana. Regarding the weak rooting ability of the genus Pinus, positive responses in plant regeneration within this genus to exogenous PBZ in culture medium are possible.
References
Aloni R, Aloni E, Langhans M, Ullrich CI (2006) Role of cytokinin and auxin in shaping root architecture: regulating vascular differentiation, lateral root initiation, root apical dominance and root gravitropism. Ann Bot 97:883–893
Beltran V, Salvadó N, Butí S, Pradell T (2016) Ageing of resin from Pinus species assessed by infrared spectroscopy. Anal Bioanal Chem 408:4073–4082
Bonga JM (1987) Clonal propagation of mature trees: problems and possible solutions. In: Bonga JM, Durzan DJ (eds) Cell and tissue culture in forestry. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 249–271
Bonga JM, Von Adrekas P (1993) Rejuvenation of tissues from mature conifers and its implications for propagation in vitro. In: Ahuja MR, Libby WJ (eds) Clonal forestry I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 182–199
Cano A, Sánche-García AB, Albacete A, González-Bayón R, Justamante MS, Ibáñez S, Acosta M, Pérez-Pérez JM (2018) Enhanced conjugation of auxin by GH3 enzymes leads to poor adventitious rooting in carnation stem cuttings. Front Plant Sci 9:1–17
De Smet I, Signora L, Beeckman T, Inze D, Foyer CH, Zhang HM (2003) An abscisic acid-sensitive check point in lateral root development of Arabidopsis. Plant J 33:543–555
Ding GJ, Zhou ZC, Wang ZR (2006) Cultivation and utilization of pulpwood stand for Pinus massoniana. China Forestry Press, Beijing, pp 1–10
Duncan DB (1955) Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1–42
Eriksson ME, Israelsson M, Olsson O, Moritz T (2000) Increased gibberellin biosynthesis in transgenic trees promotes growth, biomass production and xylem fiber length. Nat Biotech 18:784–788
Fonouni-Farde C, Kisiala A, Brault M, Emery RJN, Diet A, Frugier F (2017) DELLA1-mediated gibberellin signaling regulates cytokinin-dependent symbiotic nodulation. Plant Physiol. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.17.00919
Fonouni-Farde C, McAdam E, Nichols D, Diet A, Foo E, Frugier F (2018) Cytokinins and the CRE1 receptor influence endogenous gibberellin levels in Medicago truncatula. Plant Signal Behav 13:1–3
Fu X, Harberd NP (2003) Auxin promotes Arabidopsis root growth by modulating gibberellin response. Nature 421:740–743
Galavotti A (2013) The role of auxin in shaping shoot architecture. J Exp Bot 64:2593–2608
Hardtke CS (2003) Gibberellin signaling: GRASs growing roots. Curr Biol 13:366–367
Hedden P (2003) The genes of the green revolution. Trends Genet 19:5–9
Heide OM (2019) Juvenility, maturation and rejuvenation in plants: adventitious bud formation as a novel rejuvenation process. J Hort Sci Biotech 94:2–11
Himanen K, Vuylsteke M, Vanneste S, Vercruysse S, Boucheron E, Alard P, Chriqui D, Van Montagu M, Inze D, Beeckman T (2004) Transcript profiling of early lateral root initiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:5146–5151
Huang Y, Ji KS, Zhai JR (2007) Relationship between rooting ability and endogenous phytohormone changes in successive continuous generation cuttings of Buxus sinica var. parvifolia, an endangered woody species in China. Forest Stud China 9:189–197
Ji KS, Wang ZR, Chen TH, Wang MX (1996) Cyclophysis and effect of rejuvenation with continued cuttage in Pinus massoniana cutting propagation. J Zhejiang Forest Coll 16:341–345
Kamran M, Wennan S, Ahmad I, Xiangping M, Wenwen C, Xudong Z, Siwei M, Khan A, Qingfang H, Tiening L (2018) Application of paclobutrazol affect maize grain yield by regulating root morphological and physiological characteristics under a semi-arid region. Sci Rep 8:1–15
Li QF, Wang JD, Xiong M, Wei K, Zhou P, Huang LC, Zhang CQ, Fan XL, Liu QQ (2018) iTRAQ-based analysis of proteins co-regulated by brassinosteroids and gibberellins in rice embryos during seed germination. Int J Mol Sci 19:3460–3479
Li XY, Lv CQ, Huang BL, Wu QM, Zhang MH (2009) Adventitious roots induction of Pinus massoniana shoots in test tubes and anatomical observation. J Northwest For Univ 24:80–84
Marhavý P, Bielach A, Abas L, Abuzeineh A, Duclercq J, Tanaka H, Pařezová M, Petrášek J, Friml J, Kleine-Vehn J, Benková E (2011) Cytokinin modulates endocytic trafficking of PIN1 auxin efflux carrier to control plant organogenesis. Dev Cell 21:796–804
Marhavý P, Vanstraelen M, De Rybel B, Zhaojun D, Bennett MJ, Beeckman T, Benkova E (2013) Auxin reflux between the endodermis and pericycle promotes lateral root initiation. EMBO J 32:149–158
Mauriat M, Petterle A, Bellini C, Moritz T (2014) Gibberellins inhibit adventitious rooting in hybrid aspen and Arabidopsis by affecting auxin transport. Plant J 78:372–384
Merkle SA, Dean JF (2000) Forest tree biotechnology. Curr Opin Biotech 11:298–302
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15:473–497
Olszewski N, Sun TP, Gubler F (2002) Gibberellin signaling: biosynthesis, catabolism, and response pathways. Plant Cell 14:S61–S80
Pullman GS, Zeng XY, Copeland-Kamp B, Crockett J, Lucrezi J, May SW, Bucalo K (2015) Conifer somatic embryogenesis: improvements by supplementation of medium with oxidation–reduction agents. Tree Physiol 35:209–224
Salari H, Baninasab B, Akbari M, Rohani AM (2017) Effect of paclobutrazol on adventitious root formation of IBA-treated cuttings of ‘Zard’ and ‘Dakal’ olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. Asian J Appl Sci 5:692–699
Schaller GE, Street IH, Kieber JJ (2014) Cytokinin and the cell cycle. Curr Opin Plant Biol 21:7–15
Shi XX, Du GQ, Wang C, Ma BK, Ge YN (2007) Effects of subculture times on organogenesis characteristics of apple in vitro shoot explants. Acta Hort Sin 34:561–564
Su XC (2000) Study on the differences of the seedling of different generations from successive tissue culture of Chinese fir clone. J Fujian Coll For 20:353–356
Sun TP, Gubler F (2004) Molecular mechanism of gibberellin signaling in plants. Ann Rev Plant Biol 55:197–223
Swain SM, Singh DP (2005) Tall tales from sly dwarves: novel functions of gibberellins in plant development. Trends Plant Sci 10:123–129
Ubeda-Tomas S, Swarup R, Coates J, Swarup K, Laplaze L, Beemster GTS, Hedden P, Bhalerao R, Bennett MJ (2008) Root growth in Arabidopsis requires gibberellin/DELLA signalling in the endodermis. Nat Cell Biol 10:625–628
Vaičiukynė M, Žiaukaa J, Žūkienė R, Vertelkaitė L, Kuusienė S (2019) Abscisic acid promotes root system development in birch tissue culture: a comparison to aspen culture and conventional rooting-related growth regulators. Physiol Plant 165:114–122
Von Aderkas P, Bonga JM (2000) Influencing micropropagation and somatic embryogenesis in mature trees by manipulation of phase change, stress and culture environment. Tree Physiol 20:921–928
Waldie T, Leyser OC (2018) Targets auxin transport to promote shoot branching. Plant Physiol 177:803–818
Wang Y, Yao R (2017) Plantlet regeneration of adult Pinus massoniana lamb. Trees using explants collected in march and thidiazuron in culture medium. J For Res 28:1169–1175
Wang Y, Yao RL (2019a) Increased endogenous indole-3-acetic acid:abscisic acid ratio is a reliable marker of Pinus massoniana rejuvenation. Biotech Histochem 94:546–553
Wang Y, Yao RL (2019b) Optimization of rhizogenesis for in vitro shoot culture of Pinus massoniana lamb. J For Res in press:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11676-019-01076-8
Watson GW (1996) Tree root system enhancement with paclobutrazol. J Arbor 22:211–217
Watson G (2004) Effect of transplanting and paclobutrazol on root growth of ‘green column’ black maple and ‘summit’ green ash. J Environ Hortic 22:209–212
Wendling I, Trueman SJ, Xavier A (2014) Maturation and related aspects in clonal forestry-part II: reinvigoration, rejuvenation and juvenility maintenance. New Forest 45:473–486
Yang JC, Zhang JH, Wang ZQ, Zhu QS, Wang W (2001) Hormonal changes in the grains of rice subjected to water stress during grain filling. Plant Physiol 127:315–323
Yang MH, Zhang DL, Li ZH, Jin XC, Ding GJ (2011a) Somatic embryogenesis with immature embryos of Masson pine (Pinus massoniana lamb.). Plant Physiol J 47:904–912
Yang MH, Zhang DL, Yang Y, Ding GJ, Li ZH (2011b) Micropropagation in immature embryos of Pinus massoniana in vitro. J Central South Univ For Tech 31:90–96
Yao RL, Wang Y (2016) An effective protocol for regenerating mature Pinus massoniana L. trees by tissue culture. Res J Biotech 11:75–80
Yao RL, Wang Y, Wu YM (2016) Key factors affecting rooting of Pinus massoniana by tissue culture. Guihaia 36:1288–1294
Zhu LH, Wu XQ, Qu HY, Ji J, Ye JR (2010) Micropropagation of Pinus massoniana and mycorrhiza formation in vitro. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 102:121–128
Funding
This work was supported by the key programme of Guangxi Forestry Bureau under Grant [2016]13, the project of Scientific and Technological Plan from the Department of Science and Technology of Guangxi under Grants 2017GXNSFAA198037, AD17195078, 2018GXNSFDA281020, AA17204087-1, and 2016GXNSFBA380224, and the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 31960311 and 31360178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Editor: Wenhao Dai
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, Y., Yao, R. Increased endogenous gibberellin level inhibits root growth of Pinus massoniana Lamb. plantlets during long-term subculture. In Vitro Cell.Dev.Biol.-Plant 56, 470–479 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-020-10067-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-020-10067-y