Abstract
Introduction
Post-cholecystectomy clip migration (PCCM) is rare and can lead to complications which include clip-related biliary stones. Most have been reported as case reports. This study reviews cases of clip migration reported in the literatures.
Method
Searches and reviews of the literatures from “PubMed,” “EMBASE,” and “Google Scholar” search engines using the keywords “clip migration” and “bile duct stones” were carried out. Eighty cases from 69 publications were identified but details for only 69 cases were available for the study.
Results
The median age at presentations of PCCM was 60 years old (range, 31 to 88 years; female, 61.8%) and the median time from the initial cholecystectomy to clinical presentations was 26 months (range, 11 days to 20 years). Of primary surgeries, 23.2% was for complicated gallstones disease. The median number of clips placed during surgery was six (range, two to more than ten clips). Common diagnoses at presentations of PCCM were obstructive jaundice (37.7%), cholangitis (27.5%), biliary colic (18.8%), and acute pancreatitis (8.7%). The median number of migrated clip was one (range, one to six). Biliary dilatation and strictures were encountered in 74.1% and 28.6%, respectively. Of the 69 cases of PCCM-associated complications, 53 (77%) were successfully treated with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), 14 (20.2%) with surgery, and one (1.4%) with successful percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography treatment. One patient had spontaneous clearance of PCCM. There was no reported mortality related to PCCM.
Conclusion
PCCM can occur at any time but typically occur at a median of 2 years after cholecystectomy. Clinical presentations are similar to those with primary or secondary choledocholithiasis. Most can be managed successfully with ERCP.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Gallstones disease is common and cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice for symptomatic disease. Cholecystectomy is one of the most common operations in clinical practice, and in the United States, over half a million procedures are carried out annually.1 Since the introduction of the laparoscopic technique, laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the gold standard for the management of symptomatic gallstones disease.1,2 Complications in association with LC have been reported to be <5%. However, this is still higher than that of open cholecystectomy (OC).3–5 Recent reports have shown lower and comparable complications rates.6 Complications can be categorized into early or late.7 Early complications include bile duct injuries, bleeding, and wound infections. Fortunately, most are minor and easily managed. However, serious early complications such as major bile duct injuries are associated with prolonged hospital stay, requirement for further surgeries, and potential long-term complications such as strictures, all resulting in increased health care cost.7,8 They are also associated with litigation.9 Late complications include biliary strictures and post-cholecystectomy clip migration (PCCM).
Since its introduction, surgical hemostatic clips have been widely used and are generally considered very safe. Migration of clip into the bile duct with resultant stone formations is well recognized.10 The first case of PCCM was reported in 1978.11 Despite the increasing number of cholecystectomy being performed annually, PCCM remains rare. Apart from migration into the biliary tree, PCCM resulting in other complications such as duodenal ulcer or clip embolism have also been reported.12–14 This study reviewed the literatures and presents the characteristics and treatment outcomes of 69 cases of PCCM that had resulted in biliary complications.
Methods
Publications on PCCM were identified from the literatures through three search strategies. The first search strategy involved searches through the “PubMed” and “EMBASE” databases using the keywords “clip migration” and “bile duct stones.” The “PubMed” citations were then used to obtain details of the reported cases. The second strategy involved using the “Google Scholar” search engine using the same keywords. The third strategy involved the review of the references for further relevant articles on PCCM cited by relevant publications identified through the initial two strategies.
Overall, 69 publications reporting 80 cases were identified from the three search strategies. Fifty-seven publications were identified from “PubMed” and “EMBASE,”11,15–70 one from “Google Scholar” which was not indexed in either “PubMed” or “EMBASE,”71 and finally another 11 publications from reviewing the references of the initial 57 publications.72–82 The final strategy identified mostly articles published in the non-English literatures. These 11 publications were also not indexed in either the “PubMed” or “EMBASE” database but could be retrieved from the journal website or through the “Google Scholar” search engine using specific details, i.e., title of publications.
The total number of publications and cases reported are shown in Fig. 1. Most of the publications had originated almost equally from the three major continents: Europe (n = 20, 29.1%), Asia (n = 25, 36.2%), and North America (n = 23, 33.3% [United States, n = 22 and Canada, n = 1]). One publication originated from South America (n = 1, 1.4%). Majority of the publications reported a single case and four reported multiple cases (three reported two cases and one reported four cases).
Attempts were made to retrieve all the identified publications. In cases where full articles were not available, the abstracts that had been published in English were carefully reviewed. Only abstracts that had provided adequate details were included. Overall, six publications that had reported a total of 11 cases provided inadequate details and were excluded, leaving 69 cases for the review.32,40,47,62,63,78 Most of the excluded publications were published in non-English journals. For the articles published in non-English journals and where full publication articles were available, full translations were obtained through interpreters. The corresponding authors were also contacted via e-mail when required. All available publications were carefully analyzed. Clinical data were collected on demographics (age and gender), presentations, diagnoses, primary operative details (OC or LC: uneventful or complicated and details of complications), and number of clips used during the primary operation (stated or counted from radiological imaging provided). Data on the presence of ductal dilatations and strictures (stated or through imaging provided), treatment provided (surgery, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP], or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography [PTC]) and outcomes, laboratory investigations, and the number of clips found to have migrated were retrieved.
Results
The median age at presentations was 60 years old (range, 31 to 88 years) with more females being affected (n = 42, 61.8%). The majority had no premorbid conditions reported.
Most of the cholecystectomies were carried out for symptomatic gallstones diseases with the exception of two cases: one for gallbladder polyp and another was carried out as part of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Overall, 23.2% of the surgeries were done for complicated gallstones disease. Details of indications and types of operations carried out are shown in Table 1. Metal clips were used in all cases except for two cases where absorbable clips were used. The median number of clips used was six (range, two to 14).
The median time from cholecystectomies to clinical presentation of symptoms related to PCCM was 26 months (range, 11 days to 20 years). Three cases of PCCM occurred within 4 weeks of cholecystectomies and all occurred without stone formation.
Reported clinical symptoms and admitting diagnoses of PCCM are shown in Table 2. The most common clinical presentations were abdominal pain, jaundice, and fever. At presentations, the most common admitting diagnoses were obstructive jaundice, cholangitis, and biliary colic.
The median number of migrated clip was one (range, one to six). Thirteen cases (18.8%) had clip migrations without inducing stone formations. All of these PCCM occurred within 12 months after cholecystectomies with the exception of one case which occurred at 168 months. Overall, PCCM without stone formation occurred at a significantly shorter time interval between surgeries and presentation of PCCM (median, 5.5 months; range, 0.37 to 168 months) compared to PCCM with stone formations (median, 36 months; range, 3 to 240 months; p < 0.001, Mann–Whitney test).
Biliary dilatation (Fig. 2) and strictures (Fig. 3) were reported in 74.1% and 28.6%, respectively. Strictures were located near the cystic duct remnant. The postulated mechanisms that contributed to PCCM and subsequent biliary complications included: bile duct injuries secondary to incorrect clip placements, inadvertent placement into the biliary tree, clip slippage resulting in wound dehiscence, bile leak and biloma formation with or without infection, placement of too many clips, and difficult operations either secondary to inflammatory state or bleeding. Mechanisms contributing to stone formation include presence of clip as nidus, lithogenic bile, and bacterobilia. Figure 4 shows the possible mechanisms of PCCM and biliary complications.
Managements
Overall, of the 69 cases of PCCM-associated complications, 53 (77%) were successfully treated with ERCP, 14 (20.2%) with surgery, and one (1.4%) with successful PTC. One patient had spontaneous passage of clip after PCCM without requiring any intervention. All patients were successfully treated (Table 3). There was no reported mortality directly related to PCCM.
ERCP extractions were attempted in 62 patients and were successful in only 53 (84.5%). This included seven patients who had spontaneous clips/stones passage after failed ERCP extractions. One patient had a successful ERCP extraction of a migrated clip that had occurred within 11 days of cholecystectomy. However, this was complicated by slippage of the remaining cystic duct clip causing bile peritonitis that required surgery. This case was considered as successful ERCP extraction. Two patients required two ERCPs for complete clearance. One patient had failed an initial ERCP and PTC attempts before a successful second ERCP. Another patient had endoscopic surgery (ES)-related bleeding complicating the initial ERCP that was managed with biliary stenting before a successful second ERCP. Overall, failures of ERCP clearances were due to large stone, orientation of stone, or presence of stricture.
Fifteen patients had surgical interventions with a success rate of 93.3%. Four patients had surgery as the initial interventions, while the remainder had surgery after failed ERCP/PTC attempts. Reasons for choosing surgery as the initial interventions were: experienced endoscopist not available (n = 1), endoscopic removal facility not available (n = 2), and suspected common bile duct (CBD) cancer (n = 1). The only patient who failed the initial surgical intervention was a patient who had emergency surgery for perforated secondary bile duct. Laparotomy showed bile peritonitis and the perforation was treated with patch repair. A bile duct stone was missed during surgery. This patient underwent ERCP 3 days later for persistent bile leak. Cholangiography showed bile leak and a stone with a metallic clip at the center. This was successfully extracted after ES with resolution of bile leak.
Three patients had attempted PTC extractions and only one was successful (33.3%). This man (57 years old) had obstructive jaundice 6 years after LC. Initial imaging showed a hepatic mass suspected to be cholangiocarcinoma. This was later diagnosis to be a clip-induced stone and was successfully extracted with PTC. Of the other two cases, a second ERCP performed under general anesthesia was successful in one, while the other case proceeded to surgical extraction as part of another operation.
Spontaneous passage of migrated clip occurred in one patient without requiring any intervention 15 days after LC. This patient had a pre-LC ERCP extraction of two CBD stones after ES. The clip passage resulted in self-limiting acute pancreatitis.
Discussion
This review showed that PCCM with resultant biliary complications are uncommon with only 80 cases reported despite the large number of cholecystectomies carried out annually. The majority of the published reports had originated from the three major continents (North America, Europe, and Asia), reflecting the large number of cholecystectomies performed in these regions. The number of reported PCCM in the literature peaked in the period of 1994–1998 and this correlated with the introduction of LC. This also correlated with higher complication rates of LC reported during the initial period and this had been attributed to the learning curve for this procedure.83 As LC became the standard management of gallstones disease coupled with better training programs, complication rates of LC declined. This probably accounted for the subsequent decline in the number of cases reported.8 There were only 13 cases reported in 12 publications in the last 5-year period (2004–2008).51–58,66–73
The gender and age predilections for PCCM reflected the epidemiology of gallstones disease which is more common among females and the older age group.84 Similarly, the manifestations of PCCM-related biliary complications were not different from the non-iatrogenic choledocholithiasis. Most of the patients presented with typical symptoms of choledocholithiasis. Imaging will be required to distinguish between post-cholecystectomy primary CBD stones from PCCM-related biliary complications. Simple abdominal radiography may show abnormal positions of the metal clips.32,65
The managements of PCCM with biliary complications are similar to that of non-iatrogenic choledocholithiasis. Based on current recommendations, ERCP should be the modality of choice with surgery or PTC reserved as rescue procedures especially in the presence of difficult biliary strictures or large stones.85,86 Surgical extractions were utilized in the earlier period as ERCP techniques were still at its infancy and facilities and expertise were not widely available. This is highlighted by the cases where surgical interventions were chosen as the intervention to deal with biliary complications of PCCM.11,16,27 Overall, surgical interventions had a success rate of 93.3%. The only case that had failed surgical intervention was due to the failure to detect a CBD stone during surgery.55 The complicated nature of this particular case was probably an important factor.
ERCP became the modality of choice in the later period (previous 10 years) with a success rate of 84.5%. This is consistent with the success rate reported for non-iatrogenic choledocholithiasis.85 Even if we had included the publication that had reported on the six cases of PCCM that were successfully managed with ERCP, the overall success rate was only slightly better at 86.4%.40 In most cases, only a single ERCP attempt was required for successful clearance. Two ERCP sessions were required in two cases.43,57 Like the management of non-iatrogenic choledocholithiasis, it is important that an adequate ES is performed as it may facilitate spontaneous passage even if the initial ERCP extraction had failed. Most spontaneous passages of clip/stones had occurred within weeks of ERCP. The presence of strictures or stones that were too big or orientated in difficult positions was an important factor contributing to failures of ERCP extractions.
The exact pathogenesis of PCCM is unknown but is likely to involve complex sets of events occurring simultaneously as previously reported.10 The underlying pathogenesis probably shares some similarities to the migrations of other foreign bodies into the biliary tree that included surgical sutures, ingested materials such as seeds, vegetables matters, and toothpicks, and projectiles objects such as bullet and shrapnel.10 The process involves the initial migrations of clip into the biliary tree and later followed by stone formations.
There are many factors that contribute to the migration process. These include inaccurate clip placements with resultant bile duct injuries, local suppurative inflammatory processes, bile leak with resultant biloma formation, and local infective processes.10 In fact, it has been shown that, once a clip gets embedded within the bile duct wall, the process of clip migrations will continue.37 The location of the stricture indicated the probable site of clip injury and migration. Inadvertent placement of clips inside the bile duct during the initial operation has also been suggested. This can lead to early manifestations and probably accounted for those cases of early presentations soon after the initial surgeries. The number of clips used during the initial surgery is also an important factor. The use of more than four clips had been shown to be associated with clip migrations.37 The median numbers of clips used in the cases of PCCM were six. The indications for cholecystectomy were also important. In the acute inflammatory settings of acute cholecystitis or pancreatitis, dense adhesions and inflammations will distort the anatomy, increasing the risk for injuries. In our review, complicated gallstones disease accounted for 23.2% of cases with PCCM with resultant biliary complications. However, this number might have been higher as the full details of the initial surgeries were not available in some of the reports. LC itself may be a risk factor for complications. Generally, LC is technically more difficult and complications rates have been reported to be slightly higher compared to OC.5 Previous abdominal surgeries will further increase the risk.87 Apart from biliary complications, PCCM resulting in nonbiliary complications such duodenal ulcer and embolizations had also been reported and the underlying pathogeneses are probably similar.12–14,88,89
In order to avoid PCCM complications, all the discussed factors need to be considered and avoided. Ideally, only two clips should be left behind after cholecystectomy. Others have advocated to the use of absorbable clips. However, PCCM have also reported where absorbable clips had been used.19,67 Clipless cholecystectomy using ultrasound-activated harmonic scalpel may be an option. It has been shown to be effective, efficient, and a safe alternative for dissection and hemostasis.90–92 In addition, harmonic scalpel has also been shown to be associated with fewer complications (mild or major bile leaks and gallbladder perforation) and shorter operation time. Use in acute cholecystitis has also shown to be safe.93
As technology advances, newer and less invasive techniques are being developed and adapted for the management of many clinical disorders including gallstones disease. These include the use of fewer or single port LC and the natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. In fact, such modalities have been shown to be feasible for the management of gallstones disease and are already being used in some centers.94–96 Therefore, it will be interesting to see if there will be an increase in the number of complications related to these newer modalities as complications are associated with the learning curve for these procedures.
Overall, PCCM is rare. However, it is possible that the true incidence of PCCM with resultant biliary complications is underestimated. First, clip migrations may go unnoticed as spontaneous clip passages had been reported. Seven of the reported cases had spontaneous clips/stones migrations either after failed ERCP extractions or after LC.20,29,33,36,38,63,69 All had ES done during ERCP. Therefore, the routine use of precholecystectomy ERCP with ES may be an important factor. Second, it is possible that additional publications especially in the non-indexed, non-English journals might have been missed. Finally, cases of PCCM might have gone unreported or have been included as part of other type of publications.40 However, the overall number of missed cases is likely to be small.
In conclusion, although rare, PCCM with biliary complications need to be considered in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with typical symptoms even many years after cholecystectomies. The clinical manifestations are similar to that of primary or secondary non-iatrogenic choledocholithiasis and ERCP is currently the treatment of choice. The recent number of reported cases of PCCM with biliary complications has shown a declining trend, probably as a result of better training programs. However, it will be interesting to see if the there will be any increase in the complications rates of cholecystectomies, including PCCM, as newer techniques are being introduced for the management of symptomatic gallstones disease.
References
Ellison EC, Carey LC. Cholecystectomy, cholecystostomy, and intraoperative evaluation of the biliary tree. In Baker JR, Fishcer JE, eds. Mastery of Surgery. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001.
Barkun JS, Barkun AN, Sampalis JS, Fried G, Taylor B, Wexler MJ, Goresky CA, Meakins JL. Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group. Lancet 1992;340:1116–1119.
Buanes T, Mjåland O. Complications in laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy: a prospective comparative trial. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1996;6:266–272.
Lee VS, Chari RS, Cucchiaro G, Meyers WC. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 1993;165:527–532.
Williams LF Jr, Chapman WC, Bonau RA, McGee EC Jr, Boyd RW, Jacobs JK. Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy with open cholecystectomy in a single center. Am J Surg 1993;165:459–465.
Wolf AS, Nijsse BA, Sokal SM, Chang Y, Berger DL. Surgical outcomes of open cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era. Am J Surg 2008;197:781–784.
Shamiyeh A, Wayand W. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:164–171.
Archer SB, Brown DW, Smith CD, Branum GD, Hunter JG. Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: results of a national survey. Ann Surg 2001;234:549–558. Discussion 558–559.
Carroll BJ, Birth M, Phillips EH. Common bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy that result in litigation. Surg Endosc 1998;12:310–313. Discussion 314.
Chong VH. Iatrogenic biliary stone. Surg Technol Int 2005;14:147–155.
Walker WE, Avant GR, Reynolds VH. Cholangitis with a silver lining. Arch Surg 1979;114:214–215.
Reis LD. Surgical clips incorporated into a duodenal ulcer: a rare complication after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 2000;32:S3.
Yao CC, Wong HH, Chen CC, Wang CC, Yang CC, Lin CS. Migration of endoclip into duodenum. A rare complication after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2001;15:217.
Ammann K, Kiesenebner J, Gadenstätter M, Mathis G, Stoss F. Embolism of a metallic clip: an unusual complication following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Surg 2000;17:542–544.
Brutvan FM, Kampschroer BH, Parker HW. Vessel clip as a nidus for formation of common bile duct stone. Gastrointest Endosc 1982;28:222–223.
Margolis J. Recurrent choledocholithiasis due to hemostatic clip. Arch Surg 1986;121:1213.
Davis M, Hart B, Kleinman R. Obstructive jaundice from open vessel clip. Gastrointest Radiol 1988;13:259–260.
Farr CM, Larson C, Gladen HE, Witherspoon L, Lesperance R, Moseley D. An iatrogenic gallstone with pancreatitis. J Clin Gastroenterol 1989;11:596–597.
Janson JA, Cotton PB. Endoscopic treatment of a bile duct stone containing a surgical staple. HPB Surg 1990;3:67–71.
Onghena T, Vereecken L, Dwey K et al. Common bile duct foreign body; an unusual case. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1992;2:8–10.
Matsuura T, Kanisawa Y, Sato T et al. Migration of endo-clip into common bile duct after laparoscopic cholescytectomy. Lancet 1992;340:306.
Ghazanfari K, Gollapudi PR, Konicek FJ et al. Surgical clip as a nidus for common bile duct stone formation and successful endoscopic therapy. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:611–613.
Raoul JL, Bretagne JF, Siproudhis L et al. Cystic duct clip migration into the common bile duct: a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy treated by endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. Gastrointest Endosc 1992;38:608–611.
Dhalla SS, Duncan AW. Endoscopic removal of a common-bile-duct stone associated with a Ligaclip. Can J Surg 1992;35:344–345.
Wu WC, Katon RM, McAfee JH. Endoscopic management of common bile duct stones resulting from metallic surgical clips (cat's eye calculi). Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:712–715.
Arnaud JP, Bergamaschi R. Migration and slipping of metal clips after celioscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1993;3:487–489.
Mansvelt B, Harb J, Farkas B, et al. “Clip-stone” filiation within the biliary tract. HPB Surg 1993;6:185–188.
Sato T, Denno R, Yayama Y, et al. Unusual complications caused by endo-clip migration following a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of a case. Surg Today 1994;24:360–362.
Youssef AI, Chang AC, Chen YK. Surgical clip as a nidus for choledocholithiasis: successful endoscopic management. Am J Gastroenterol 1994;89:2280–2281.
Martinez J, Combs W, Brady PG. Surgical clips as a nidus for biliary stone formation: diagnosis and therapy. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:1521–1524.
Rizzo J, Tripodi J, Gold B, et al. Surgical clips as a nidus for stone formation in the common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol 1995;21:169–171.
Tritapepe R. Bile duct stones recurring around metal clips. Panminerva Med 1995;37:105.
Brogdon BG, Neuffer FH, Siner JR. Choledochal ‘clipoliths’ after cholecystectomy. South Med J 1996;89:1111–1113.
Entel RJ, Peebles MW. Migratory surgical clip in the common bile duct: CT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 1996;21:329–330.
Shibata S, Okumichi T, Kimura A et al. A case of choledocholithiasis with an endoclip nidus, 6 month after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 1996;10:1097–1098.
Venu RP, Brown RD, Rosenthal G et al. An impacted metallic clip at the ampulla causing ascending cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1997;45:435–436.
Cetta F, Lombardo F, Baldi C et al. Clip migration within the common duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a case of transient acute pancreatitis in the absence of associated stones. Endoscopy 1997;29:S59–S60.
Cetta F, Baldi C, Lombardo F, Monti L, Stefani P, Nuzzo G. Migration of metallic clips used during laparoscopic cholecystectomy and formation of gallstones around them: surgical implications from a prospective study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1997;7:37–46.
Bradfield H, Granke D. Surgical clip as a nidus for a common bile duct stone: radiographic demonstration. Abdom Imaging 1997;22:293–294.
Prat F, Pelletier G, Ponchon T, Fritsch J, Meduri B, Boyer J, Person B, Bretagne JF. What role can endoscopy play in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Endoscopy 1997;29:341–348.
Herline AF, Fisk JM, Debelak JP, et al. Surgical clips: a cause of late recurrent gallstones. Am Surg 1998;64:845–848.
Ng WT, Kong CK, Lee WM. Migration of three endoclips following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 1999;44:200–202.
Albert MS, Fenoglio M, Ratzer E. Recurrent common bile stones containing metallic clips following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 1999;9:441–444.
Matsumoto H, Ikeda E, Mitsunaga S et al. Choledochal stenosis and lithiasis caused by penetration and migration of surgical metal clips. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2000;7:603–605.
Mansoa A, Martins A, Brito E, et al. Surgical clips as a nidus for stone formation in the common bile duct. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1189. Epub 2000 Sep 28.
Yoshizumi T, Ikeda T, Shimizu T, et al. Clip migration causes choledocholithiasis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2000;14:1188. Epub 2000 Oct 5.
Leggett P, Atwa H, Hamat H. Use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography to dislodge clip impingement on the common hepatic duct. Surg Endosc 2001;15:1490.
Tsumura H, Ichikawa T, Kagawa T, et al. Failure of endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones due to endoclip migration following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002;9:274–277.
Petersen JM. Surgical clip choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:113.
Dell'Abate P, Del Rio P, Soliani P, et al. Choledocholithiasis caused by migration of a surgical clip after video laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2003;13:203–204.
Hai S, Tanaka H, Kubo S, et al. Choledocholithiasis caused by migration of a surgical clip into the biliary tract following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003;12:2028–2031. Epub 2003 Oct 23.
Angel R, Abisambra N, Marin JC. Clip choledocholithiasis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 2004;36:251.
Chong VH, Yim HB, Lim CC. Clip-induced biliary stone. Singapore Med J 2004;45:533–535.
Khanna S, Vij JC. Endoclips as nidus for choledocholithiasis presenting 5 years after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Endoscopy 2005;37:188.
Mouzas IA, Petrakis I, Vardas E, et al. Bile leakage presenting as acute abdomen due to a stone created around a migrated surgical clip. Med Sci Monit 2005;11:CS16–CS18.
Ahn SI, Lee KY, Kim SJ, Cho EH, Choi SK, Hur YS, Cho YU, Hong KC, Shin SH, Kim KR, Woo ZH, Jeong S. Surgical clips found at the hepatic duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a possible case of clip migration. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2005;15:279–282.
Alsulaiman R, Barkun J, Barkun A. Surgical clip migration into the common bile duct after orthotopic liver transplantation. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;64:833–834.
Steffen M, Kronsbein H, Wesche L. Metal clip as a nidus for formation of common bile duct stone following laparascopic cholecystectomy. Z Gastroenterol 2007;45:317–319.
Attwell A, Hawes R. Surgical clip migration and choledocholithiasis: a late, abrupt complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dig Dis Sci 2007;52:2254–2256. Epub 2007 Feb 15.
Dolay K, Alis H, Soylu A, Altaca G, Aygun E. Migrated endoclip and stone formation after cholecystectomy: a new danger of acute pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol 2007;13:6446–6448.
Wittenberg H, Freise J, Meyer HJ, et al. Gallstone formation following transmural migration of a surgical clip in the bile ducts. Case report. Z Gastroenterol 1985;23:139–142. Article in German with English abstract.
Hemmi P, Diaz D, Steffen A, et al. Late jaundice after cholecystectomy by laparoscopy, caused by a endo-choledochal clip (article in French). Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1992;16:725–726.
Heinrich CE, Linder MM, Gullotta H, et al. Obstructive jaundice caused by a metal clip in the common bile duct following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 1993;118:1177. Article in German with English abstract.
Delcenserie R, Yzet T, Finet L, et al. Calculi of the common bile duct around a surgical metallic clip: “cat's eye calculi”. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1994;18:531–532. Article in French.
Muehlenberg K, Loffler A. Clip migration in the common bile duct and consecutive calculus formation after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Z Gastroenterol 1995;33:108–111. Article in German with English abstract.
Lee KW, Lee JW, Jeong S, et al. A case of common bile duct stone formed around a surgical clip after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean J Gastroenterol 2003;42:347–350. Article in Korean with English abstract.
Oh HJ, Jung HJ, Chai JI, et al. A case of common bile duct stone developed due to a surgical clip as a nidus: an experience of successful management by endoscopy. Korean J Gastroenterol 2003;42:351–353. Article in Korean with English abstract.
Schmid A, Vliegen R, Beets-Tan R. OP clip as a cause of calcification resulting in choledocholithiasis. Rofo 2005;177:1168–1169.
Kissmeyer-Nielsen P, Kiil J. Endoclip on the cystic duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ugeskr Laeger 2005;167:2657–2658. In Danish.
Supanc V, Duvnjak M, Pavie T, Beslin MB. Cystic duct clip migration-first reported case of successful endoscopic extraction of common bile duct stones resulting from surgical clips in Croatia. Acta Clin Croat 1999;38:55–57.
Khawaja FI. Role of ERCP in diagnosis and management of “clip cholangitis”: case report and review of the literature. Saudi J Gastroenterol 1995;1:97–101
Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Kimura K, Watanabe H, Mochizuki F. Foreign bodies in the bile duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy—a case report. Dig Endosc 1994;6:287–290.
Takahashi H, Yokoi K, Wada M, et al. A case of postoperative bile duct stone by aberrant surgical clip after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 1996;29:85–88. In Japanese with English abstract.
Ito A, Hashimoto T, Nagaoaka M, et al. Choledocholithiasis due to aberrant end-clips after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Jpn Surg Assoc 1999;60:1892–1896. In Japanese with English abstract.
Obama K, Nakamura Y, Hashida H, et al. Gallstone caused by migration of cystic duct metal clips into the common bile duct. Jpn J Gastroenterol Surg 2000;33:347–351.
Uehara H, Abe T, Hosokawa M, et al. Choledocholithiasis due to a migrated metal clip after laparoscopic cholecystectomy-report of a case. J Jpn Surg Assoc 2001;62:487–490. In Japanese with English abstract.
Takeuchi H, Yoshida T, Morii Y, Koga S, Hashimoto K, Takeuchi K, Taketomi A, Hidaka H, Matsumata T. A case of common bile duct stone caused by migration of cystic duct metallic clips and elastic thread after choledocholithotomy and C-tube drainage. Surgical Therapy 2003;89:737–739.
Asano H, kano K, Ito Y, et al. Common bile duct stone formed around vessel clip after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Journal of Biliary Tract & Pancreas 1993;14:587–591.
Son GS, Kim CD, Suh SO. Choledocholithiasis with a metallic clip after cholecystectomy. Korean J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 1997;1:189–192.
Hur BW, Choi CW, Kim KH, et al. A case f common bile duct stone resulting from a migrated surgical clip after a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 1999;19:139–142.
Yu HC, Cho BH. A case of common bile duct stone with migrated endosclip as a nidus after laparoscopic cholecystectomy treated with choledocholithotomy. Journal of the Korean Society of Endoscopic & Laparoscopic Surgeons 1999;2:14–20.
Kwon YW, Hur BW, Oh WS, Lee JH, Kim HK. A case of common bile duct obstruction caused by migration of surgical metal clips. Korean J Med 2005;69:S772–S776.
Fletcher DR, Hobbs MS, Tan P, Valinsky LJ, Hockey RL, Pikora TJ, Knuiman MW, Sheiner HJ, Edis A. Complications of cholecystectomy: risks of the laparoscopic approach and protective effects of operative cholangiography: a population-based study. Ann Surg 1999;229:449–457.
Tangedahl TN. Who gets gallstones and why. Postgrad Med. 1979;66:175–176. 178–179.
Williams EJ, Green J, Beckingham I, Parks R, Martin D, Lombard M; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS). Gut 2008;57:1004–1021. Epub 2008 Mar 5. Review.
Anonymous. NIH state-of-the-science statement on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for diagnosis and therapy. NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19:1–26. Review.
Karayiannakis AJ, Polychronidis A, Perente S, Botaitis S, Simopoulos C. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with previous upper or lower abdominal surgery. Surg Endosc 2004;18:97–101. Epub 2003 Oct 23.
Wasserberg N, Gal E, Fuko Z, Niv Y, Lelcuk S, Rubin M. Surgical clip found in duodenal ulcer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003;13:387–388.
Samim MM, Armstrong CP. Surgical clip found at duodenal ulcer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of a case. Int J Surg 2001;6:473–474.
Westervelt J. Clipless cholecystectomy: broadening the role of the harmonic scalpel. JSLS 2004;8:283–285.
Bessa SS, Al-Fayoumi TA, Katri KM, Awad AT. Clipless laparoscopic cholecystectomy by ultrasonic dissection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2008;18:593–598.
Vu T, Aguilo R, Marshall NC. Clipless technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using the harmonic scalpel. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90:612.
Catena F, Ansaloni L, Di Saverio S, Gazzotti F, Coccolini F, Pinna AD. Prospective analysis of 101 consecutive cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis operated with harmonic scalpel. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2009;19:312–316.
Uecker J, Adams M, Skipper K, Dunn E. Cholecystitis in the octogenarian: is laparoscopic cholecystectomy the best approach? Am Surg 2001;67:637–640.
Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross SB, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:188–192.
Auyang ED, Hungness ES, Vaziri K, Martin JA, Soper NJ. Human NOTES cholecystectomy: transgastric hybrid technique. J Gastrointest Surg 2009;13:1149–1150.
Acknowledgement
We would like to acknowledge the assistance of Chong VS and Lim KC for retrieving some of the identified publications, Chong CM for the figure illustration (Fig. 4), and Ms. Lim Ai Giok for the preparation of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
None.
Financial Disclosure
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chong, V.H., Chong, C.F. Biliary Complications Secondary to Post-Cholecystectomy Clip Migration: A Review of 69 Cases. J Gastrointest Surg 14, 688–696 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1131-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1131-0