Abstract
Until recently, advanced stage gallbladder cancer has been viewed with great pessimism and many patients abandoned as without potentially curative treatment option. Recent results have significantly improved due to a number of advances. Improvements in radiologic staging including positron emission tomography now allow selection of patients with disease treatable by local regional resection. With improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques, aggressive surgery has proven T3 and T4 tumors to be resectable with safety and result in long-term survival.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
T3 gallbladder cancer comprises those tumors that perforate the serosa (visceral peritoneum) of the gallbladder and may invade adjacent organs including the surrounding liver. Once the tumor penetrates the muscularis layer of the gallbladder, tumor cells have access to the lymphatics. Tumors growing through the serosa also have a high propensity for peritoneal dissemination. In a recent series, cases of T3 gallbladder cancer were found to have lymphatic metastases in 58% of patients, and peritoneal metastases in 42%.1 This would explain the low (27%) likelihood of surgical resection for all T3 tumors encountered. Thus, one of the challenges is identification of disseminated disease both preoperatively and by minimally invasive methods to avoid the morbidity of laparotomy for those with unresectable disease.
Improvements in Tumor Staging
Preoperative Imaging
Cross-sectional imaging has improved tremendously over the last decade to allow definitive diagnosis of a majority of cases of unresectable disease. With a good computed tomography angiogram, invasion of the perihepatic vasculature can be well defined. Not only can the portal venous involvement by tumor be seen but involvement of the hepatic arteries can also be noted. Of particular importance is the status of the right hepatic artery, which passes behind the common bile duct in the region of the neck of the gallbladder. Patients who are jaundiced from a biliary obstruction at this level are highly likely to have invasion of the hepatic artery. The reason this is important is that jaundiced patients tolerate hypoxia poorly. Thus, in patients with clear right hepatic arterial involvement, a right hepatic lobectomy may be necessary in order to achieve an R0 resection. Alternatively, a preoperative biliary drainage to relieve jaundice may be prudent to improve safety of the subsequent resection.
Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography
This technique may also be useful in the patient who is jaundiced in helping define the level of biliary obstruction. We have found, however, that this test is most useful before any biliary drainage, when the bile ducts are very dilated. With improvements in multidetector computer tomography units in the last decade that now allow very precise assessment of liver, vascular, and even peritoneal involvement by tumor, the need for the more expensive magnetic resonance scanning has greatly diminished.
Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography
This type of scanning has evolved to become an important test in the management of gallbladder cancer. It is capable of confirming lymphatic metastases in this population of patients with high likelihood of such metastases. It is also capable of identification of peritoneal disease, including laparoscopic port involvement.2 In a recent series of 126 patients with biliary or gallbladder cancers, 24% of PET scans performed as preoperative staging influenced therapy.2 For T3 or T4 gallbladder cancer, we now consider fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography an important staging tool in patient selection for radical surgery.
Extent of Surgery
Extent of Liver Resection
By definition, T3 cancers transgress the gallbladder serosa. The cystic plate is the gallbladder serosa on the liver side. Thus, the minimal resection necessary is the gallbladder fossa, consisting of segments 4B and 5 of the liver. There are times that a bigger liver resection is necessary. The most clear-cut case is involvement of the vasculature of the right lobe, most commonly the right hepatic artery. In patients who have had a recent exploration and cholecystectomy for presumed cholelithiasis, a right hepatic lobectomy may also be necessary because the recent surgery may make it difficult to distinguish tumor from scars. This approach is supported by data. Figure 1 demonstrates the outcome for 123 patients with T3 gallbladder cancer treated either with no resection, simple cholecystectomy, or radical resection. All patients without surgical resection died by 18 months with a median survival of 6 months. The 5-year survival of patients subjected to simple cholecystectomy was 5%, while that for radical resection was 22%.
Extent of Lymph Node Dissection
The likelihood of lymphatic dissemination is 58%1 for a T3 gallbladder cancer. Therefore, from a theoretical standpoint, resection of the perihepatic lymph nodes is not only important for staging but also possibly important as therapy. This has been borne out by data. Recently, Coburn et al. examined surveillance, epidemiology, and end results data and analyzed the difference in outcome for the 1,114 patients not treated with a radical lymph node dissection compared with the 71 with documented lymphadenectomy. There was a survival advantage for those treated with lymphadenectomy.3
Recommendation
In cases of T3 gallbladder cancer, the minimal operation with curative intent is cholecystectomy with segments 4B and 5 resections and a portal lymphadenectomy. For those with prior cholecystectomy, a right hepatic lobectomy and additional resection of port sites may be necessary because of the high risk of port implantation of tumor.4
Outcomes
The perioperative mortality for such radical resections has greatly improved over the last two decades. Most recent series report an operative mortality less than 5%.
The long-term outcome of patients after radical resection clearly is superior to those treated with simple cholecystectomy or no surgery.5 Nevertheless, it is sobering that recent data still demonstrate that long-term survival and cure only occur in a minority of patients even after radical resection (Table 1). Only 20% seem to be long-term survivors. This is partly due to the resistance of these tumors to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The search for effective adjuvant systemic and biologic therapies is, therefore, the most important issue in further improvements of outcome for patients afflicted with this dismal disease.
References
Fong Y, Jarnagin W, Blumgart LH. Gallbladder cancer: comparison of patients presenting initially for definitive operation with those presenting after prior noncurative intervention. Ann Surg 2000;232:557–569. doi:10.1097/00000658-200010000-00011.
Corvera CU, Blumgart LH, Akhurst T et al. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography influences management decisions in patients with biliary cancer. J Am Coll Surg 2008;206:57–65. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.002.
Coburn NG, Cleary SP, Tan JC et al. Surgery for gallbladder cancer: a population-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:371–382. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2008.02.031.
Fong Y, Brennan MF, Turnbull A et al. Gallbladder cancer discovered during laparoscopic surgery. Potential for iatrogenic tumor dissemination. Arch Surg 1993;128:1054–1056.
Kohya N, Miyazaki K. Hepatectomy of segment 4a and 5 combined with extra-hepatic bile duct resection for T2 and T3 gallbladder carcinoma. J Surg Oncol 2008;97:498–502. doi:10.1002/jso.20982.
Reddy SK, Marroquin CE, Kuo PC et al. Extended hepatic resection for gallbladder cancer. Am J Surg 2007;194:355–361. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.02.013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dai, M., Fong, Y. & Lowy, A. Treatment of T3 Gallbladder Cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13, 2040–2042 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0810-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-0810-1