Abstract
Diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a functional imaging technique that derives image contrast from differences in water molecule diffusion within tissues. DW MRI helps detect and characterize renal and urothelial malignancies, may help in differentiating some benign from malignant renal masses, and can also recognize renal and upper urinary tract infections. Patients precluded from receiving intravenous contrast agents may particularly benefit from this technique.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Applications of diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the body have rapidly expanded in the past several years, coinciding with advances in MRI techniques and hardware technology. DW MRI is a functional imaging technique that derives image contrast from differences in the random motion of water molecules (“Brownian motion”) at the cellular level. The ability to depict areas of high cellularity can be helpful in lesion detection and tissue characterization. DW MRI does not rely on intravenous contrast, so patients with renal failure who are at risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis or nephrotoxicity may particularly benefit from this technique in the evaluation for renal and upper urinary tract cancer.
DW MR imaging and analysis
Water molecules exhibit varying levels of restricted motion in biologic tissues, the degree of which inversely correlates with tissue cellularity and cell membrane integrity [1]. Diffusion of water molecules is restricted in highly cellular tissues due to reduced extracellular space and by intact cell membranes that act as barriers to diffusion between the intracellular and extracellular spaces [1]. Highly cellular tissues (i.e., solid neoplasms) will, therefore, demonstrate greater restricted diffusion than tissues with low cellularity (i.e., cysts) and/or defective cell membranes. This forms the basis for DW MRI to derive image contrast. In addition, diffusion characteristics of tissues partly relate to microvascular perfusion. Thus, the kidney is a particularly interesting organ to study due to its high vascularity and inherent fluid transport properties [2].
In general, DW MR in the body uses a fast single-shot echo-planar imaging based sequence. Parallel imaging significantly shortens acquisition time and increases the signal-to-noise ratio [3]. Breath-hold or respiratory-gated techniques are commonly employed to minimize motion artifact. Alternatively, patients may be instructed on the use of “free-breathing” (shallow breathing throughout image acquisition), a technique that yields diagnostic quality images in many patients. Robust fat suppression also helps eliminate ghosting from respiration and chemical shift artifact [3].
To achieve meaningful interpretation, DW images are acquired with at least two different b-values (i.e., low and high) in order to calculate an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map. By drawing regions of interest on an ADC map, ADC values are derived to allow the quantification of diffusion in specific tissues (“quantitative analysis”). Alternatively, conclusions may be readily drawn by simple visual inspection of the b-value images and the corresponding ADC map (“qualitative analysis”). Images obtained with high b-values (i.e., 800 or 1000 s/mm2) produce greater signal loss from water molecules [1]. Therefore, tissues that exhibit the greatest degree of restricted diffusion are seen as areas of retained (bright) signal on high b-value images and show low signal intensity on the corresponding ADC map. Renal DW MRI improves lesion conspicuity and may help characterize tissues in a noninvasive manner.
Renal cell carcinoma
DW MR has a promising role in the characterization of renal masses. Highly cellular neoplasms, such as solid renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), typically maintain bright signal intensity compared to normal renal parenchyma on high b-value images. Conversely, renal masses with low cellularity such as benign cysts typically have less restricted water diffusion and lose signal on high b-value images (Fig. 1) [1]. Nonetheless, RCC can have a varied appearance on DW MRI owing to differing degrees of cellularity and elements of cystic change, necrosis, or hemorrhage. In complex renal masses, solid enhancing tumor components demonstrate lower ADC values than necrotic or cystic regions (Fig. 2) [4]. Areas of restricted diffusion in a mixed solid and cystic renal mass may help differentiate an RCC with cystic or necrotic areas from a benign complicated cyst that might otherwise appear similar on conventional MRI obtained without contrast [4, 5].
With regard to renal masses favored to represent RCC at imaging, some authors suggest that DW MRI may potentially allow differentiation of RCC subtype and histologic grade based upon their respective ADC values. Wang et al. [6] reported statistically significant differences in ADC values among the three major subtypes of RCC at 3.0-T MRI. Papillary RCCs have been demonstrated to have the lowest ADC values, a feature that may relate both to the high cellularity and decreased perfusion or hypovascular nature of this particular RCC subtype [6, 7]. Rosenkrantz et al. [8] reported significantly lower ADC values in high-grade compared to low-grade clear cell RCC. Similarly, Yu et al. [9] found that ADC values decreased with increasing pathological grade of clear cell RCC. With advanced or metastatic RCC, the ability to characterize RCC preoperatively could alter the selection of clinical therapy [8].
Upper urinary tract carcinoma
Urothelial carcinomas also exhibit restricted diffusion due to high cellularity; they stand out as areas of bright signal intensity against a background of suppressed signal within the collecting system and adjacent normal renal parenchyma on high b-value images while demonstrating low signal on the corresponding ADC map (Fig. 3). Yoshida et al. [10] found that the accuracy and sensitivity for detecting upper urinary tract carcinoma at MRI can be significantly improved by adding DW imaging to standard anatomic and fluid-sensitive sequences; in fact, the diagnostic abilities of DW MRI alone in comparison to dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI were not markedly different. DW MRI may also be a useful adjunct in preoperative assessments of tumor grade or aggressiveness; Akita et al. [11] reported a significant difference between mean ADC values of high-grade versus low-grade renal pelvic urothelial carcinomas. DW MRI is limited in depicting carcinoma in situ and small lesions less than or equal to 5 mm in size [12]. Additionally, the mere presence of retained bright signal on high b-value images is not entirely specific for malignancy. A benign entity that also exhibits restricted diffusion, such as a focal inflammatory process, could be mistaken for tumor. Thus, DW MRI should be interpreted in conjunction with conventional MRI sequences to allow better morphologic assessment [10].
Differential diagnoses
Investigators have shown ADC values of benign renal lesions to be significantly higher than malignant lesions [4, 5, 7, 13, 14]. Despite this, there has been a general inability to reliably differentiate benign solid renal masses from malignant masses based upon respective ADC values thus far. In one promising exception, however, Taouli et al. [7] reported that renal oncocytomas had significantly higher ADC values than solid RCCs (Fig. 4). Larger studies are needed to validate these results, and surgical excision is still required for definitive diagnosis. Renal hemorrhagic cysts can sometimes demonstrate very low signal on the ADC map, a finding that may relate to the “T2 blackout” effects of an intrinsically T2 hypointense lesion and/or restricted diffusion in blood products (Fig. 5) [14]. In our experience, fluid–fluid or hematocrit levels can be observed in some hemorrhagic cysts. They characteristically lack solid enhancing components, although small lesion size and motion artifact can limit accurate evaluation.
Renal infection and some associated complications also demonstrate restricted diffusion and should not be mistaken for malignancy. Pyelonephritis results in patchy non-masslike areas of restricted diffusion in portions of the renal parenchyma, a finding that may relate to inflammatory cell infiltration and possible ischemic effects of infection (Fig. 6) [3, 15]. A renal abscess could simulate a solid renal mass on DW images due to marked restricted diffusion owing to viscous fluid containing bacteria, mucoid proteins, and cellular debris, but an abscess is usually suspected clinically (Fig. 7) [3]. While not easily confused with tumor, the presence of pus within an obstructed collecting system is crucial to recognition; emergent percutaneous decompression is indicated because these patients can become septic and deteriorate rapidly. Differentiation between pyonephrosis and hydronephrosis may not be possible on ultrasound and standard MRI sequences; however, DW MRI easily differentiates the two because pyonephrosis demonstrates marked restricted diffusion (Fig. 8) [15, 16].
Conclusion
This article demonstrates basic principles, imaging features, and current roles of DW MRI in the evaluation of renal and upper urinary tract cancer and infection. DW MRI may be particularly helpful in patients who cannot receive intravenous contrast.
References
Koh D, Collins DJ. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the body: applications and challenges in oncology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1622–35.
Müller MF, Prasad PV, Bimmler D, Kaiser A, Edelman RR. Functional imaging of the kidney by means of measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Radiology. 1994;193:711–5.
Bittencourt LK, Matos C, Coutinho AC. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the upper abdomen: technical issues and clinical applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2011;19:111–31.
Zhang J, Tehrani YM, Wang L, Ishill NM, Schwartz LH, Hricak H. Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging—a preliminary experience. Radiology. 2008;247:458–64.
Sandrasegaran K, Sundaram CP, Ramaswamy R, Akisik FM, Rydberg MP, Lin C, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of renal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:438–45.
Wang H, Cheng L, Zhang X, Wang D, Guo A, Gao Y, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: diffusion-weighted MR imaging for subtype differentiation at 3.0 T. Radiology. 2010;257:135–43.
Taouli B, Thakur RK, Mannelli L, Babb JS, Kim S, Hecht EM, et al. Renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2009;251:398–407.
Rosenkrantz AB, Niver BE, Fitzgerald EF, Babb JS, Chandarana H, Melamed J. Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:W344–51.
Yu X, Lin M, Ouyang H, Zhou C, Zhang H. Application of ADC measurement in characterization of renal cell carcinomas with different pathological types and grades by 3.0 T diffusion-weighted MRI. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:3061–6.
Yoshida S, Masuda H, Ishii C, Tanaka H, Fujii Y, Kawakami S, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in diagnosis of upper urinary tract cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:110–6.
Akita H, Jinzaki M, Kikuchi E, Sugiura H, Akita A, Mikami S, et al. Preoperative T categorization and prediction of urothelial carcinoma in renal pelvis using diffusion-weighted MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:1130–6.
Iancu AS, Colin P, Puech P, Villers A, Ouzzane A, Fantoni JC, et al. Significance of ADC value for detection and characterization of urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract using diffusion-weighted MRI. World J Urol. 2013;31:13–9.
Cova M, Squillaci E, Stacul F, Manenti G, Gava S, Simonetti G, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI in the evaluation of renal lesions: preliminary results. Br J Radiol. 2004;77:851–7.
Kim S, Jain M, Harris AB, Lee VS, Babb JS, Sigmund EE, et al. T1 hyperintense renal lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging versus contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology. 2009;251:796–807.
Verswijvel G, Vandecaveye V, Gelin G, Vandevenne J, Grieten M, Horvath M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of renal infection: preliminary results. JBR-BTR. 2002;85:100–3.
Chan JHM, Tsui EYK, Luk SH, Fung SL, Cheung YK, Chan MSM, et al. MR diffusion-weighted imaging of kidney: differentiation between hydronephrosis and pyonephrosis. Clin Imaging. 2001;25:110–3.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Cogley, J.R., Nguyen, D.D., Ghobrial, P.M. et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI of renal cell carcinoma, upper tract urothelial carcinoma, and renal infection: a pictorial review. Jpn J Radiol 31, 643–652 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0237-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-013-0237-1