Introduction

The new energy storage devices with high energy and power density must be developed for satisfying the increasing energy demands for electric vehicles and other electric devices [1,2,3]. Lithium-sulfur batteries could meet the increasing high energy demand due to their high specific capacity (1675 mAh/g) and energy density (2600 Wh/Kg) [4,5,6]. In addition, the sulfur active cathode materials have following advantages, such as natural abundance and no pollution. Therefore, during the past decades, many researchers have been devoted themselves to study the lithium-sulfur batteries [7,8,9,10,11,12]. Although great improvements have been obtained, there are still problems to inhibit the wide application of the lithium-sulfur batteries [13]. On the one hand, the sulfur active materials suffer from poor electronic conductivity. On the other hand, it has poor polysulfide conversion during the electrochemical cycles due to polysulfide dissolution [14,15,16,17].

To deal with these problems, numerous efforts have been paid to improve the electronic conductivity and the polysulfide conversion. It can be concluded as following aspects: constructing perfect sulfur host structures as sulfur matrix [18], adding polar materials or doping elements [19], protecting lithium anode [20], and other functional interlayers and separators [21]. Overall, these methods make some achievements for improving the electrochemical performance of the lithium-sulfur batteries. However, there are still issues. Therefore, it is urgent to develop new functional host materials to improve the electronic conductivity and accelerating the polysulfide conversion during the electrochemical cycles. Metal sulfides are one of the most promising materials due to their unique structure and properties. And it has been applied in many areas, such as energy storage, catalysts, and other related fields [22]. Therefore, it is necessary to further construct MoS2 structure to increase the active site, which could accelerate the polysulfide conversion.

In this work, we report the employment of metal sulfide MoS2 nanosheets with abundant active sites as catalysts to promote the polysulfide conversion. When used as cathode materials in Li–S batteries, the electrochemical results indicate that the MoS2/S cathode delivers high specific capacity and stable cycling performance. It shows high initial specific capacity of 1536 mAh/g at the current density of 0.1 C, which is much higher than the reported cathode materials. The excellent electrochemical performance is attributed to the presence of the metal sulfide, which could accelerate the polysulfide conversion and improve the whole electronic conductivity. This work provides new insights to enhance the electrochemical performance by using metal sulfide as sulfur matrix for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries.

Experimental

Preparation of MoS2/S composites

Typically, 0.8 g Na2MoO4·2H2O (99.9%, Aldrich) and 0.6 g thioacetamide (99.9%, Sigma) were dissolved in the ethanol. And then the mixture was transferred into high pressure reactor and then maintained at 180 °C for 12 h. After cooling to the room temperature, the samples were washed by using deionized water for three times and dried at 60 ℃ for 12 h. After that, the samples were heated with sublimed sulfur (Alfa Aesar) with ratio of 1:3 at 155 ℃ for 12 h to prepare MoS2/S composites.

Materials characterization

The morphology and microstructure of the samples are carried out by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, Tescan Mira 3). The crystal and phase compositions are performed on powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, Rigaku-mini Flex600) and Raman spectra (YT-LM). Brunauer Emmett-Teller (BET) and Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) methods are applied to calculate the specific surface and the pore size distribution of samples.

Electrochemical measurement

The as-obtained MoS2/S composites with poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF) binder and Ketjen black (KB) with a weight ratio of 8:1:1 are dispersed in N-methyl pyrrolidone (NMP) to form a uniform slurry and coated on Al foils and then placed in a vacuum drying oven at 70 ℃ for 24 h. Similarly, the pure S cathode was prepared by mixing sublimed sulfur (Alfa Aesar), KB, and PVDF with weight ratio of 7:2:1 in NMP and coated on Al foils. The electrode was subsequently punched out a circular disk with a 15 mm diameter. The sulfur loading is ~ 1.6 mg cm−2. Celgard 2400 is used as separator and Li metal acts as negative electrode. The electrolyte consists of 1 M lithium bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl) imide (LiTFSI) in DOL: DME (1:1 by volume) solution with 1 wt% LiNO3. The electrolyte/S mass ratio is about 5:1. The charge–discharge test with voltage from 1.5 to 3.0 V is performed on a Neware multichannel battery tester at room temperature. Cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) are conducted on CHI660E electrochemical workstation.

Results and discussion

The crystal structure of all samples was characterized by using X-ray diffraction. As shown in Fig. 1, the pure MoS2 samples show typical diffraction peaks, which is corresponding to the crystal planes, which is according to the reported literatures [23]. Furthermore, it can be seen that the as-prepared MoS2/S composites exhibit diffraction peaks of the element sulfur, confirming the successful immersion of sulfur into the MoS2 samples. This also indicates the preparation of the MoS2/S composites via the heating method.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of the MoS2 and MoS2/S composites

To investigate the pore structure of the samples, N2 adsorption/desorption was conducted. As shown in Fig. 2a, it can be seen that the MoS2 samples exhibit typical mesoporous structure. This can be judged by the shape of the N2 adsorption/desorption curve. It is a typical IV type hoop for the MoS2 samples, indicating the presence of the mesoporous structure [24]. The mesoporous structure is beneficial for the sulfur immersion during the heating process. In addition, the pore size of the samples is tested. As shown in Fig. 2b, it can be clearly observed that the pore size of the MoS2 samples is about 10 nm, further demonstrating the presence of the mesoporous structure. More importantly, the inset of Fig. 2b shows the SEM image of the MoS2 samples. It can be seen that it displays nanosheet structure with abundant surface active sites.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a N2 adsorption/desorption curve and (b) pore size distribution of the MoS2 samples. The SEM image of MoS2 sample in the inset of (b)

Furthermore, the electrochemical performance of the samples was tested by using corresponding electrochemical measurements. As shown in Fig. 3a, the CV curves of the MoS2/S cathode have two reduction peaks at 2.3 V and 2.1 V, respectively. These two peaks are corresponding to the multistep electrochemical reaction from sulfur to Li2S. During the discharging process, there are polysulfides in the electrolyte, which could lead to severe shuttle effect. In addition, there is one oxidation peak at 2.5 V, which is attributed to the reversible electrochemical reaction from Li2S to element sulfur. On the other hand, it can be seen that the CV curves overlap well with the increase of the cycle numbers. This indicates the superior cycling stability of the MoS2/S cathode, proving the excellent electrochemical reaction kinetic as cathode in the lithium-sulfur batteries. Furthermore, the constant discharge/charge profiles of the MoS2/S cathode were tested at different rates from 0.1 C to 3 C. As shown in Fig. 3b, it can be seen that the MoS2/S cathode delivers high capacity of 1536 mAh/g at 0.1 C, which is much higher than the other reported cathode materials in the lithium-sulfur batteries. With the increase of the current densities, the MoS2/S cathode still shows high capacity. This confirms the superior electrochemical performance at high current densities, which is attributed to the improved electronic conductivity and enhanced polysulfide conversion.

Fig. 3
figure 3

a CV profiles and (b) discharge–charge curves of the MoS2/S cathode

To further explain the superior electrochemical performance of the MoS2/S cathode, EIS was conducted. As shown in Fig. 4a, the as-prepared MoS2/S cathode exhibits much smaller resistance than the pure S cathode. This can be observed from the diameter of the semicircle in the high-frequency region. The diameter of the semicircle represents the charge transfer resistance of the electrode. The much bigger diameter of the semicircle, the higher charge transfer resistance in the electrode. Encouraged by the high specific capacity, long-term cycling stability of the MoS2/S cathode was tested at 2 C for 300 cycles. As shown in Fig. 4b, there is a capacity value of 902 mAh/g after 300 cycles at high current density of 2 C, demonstrating excellent cycling performance. The excellent electrochemical performance is ascribed to the presence of the MoS2 matrix for the element sulfur. On the one hand, it can enhance the electronic conductivity of the whole cathode. On the other hand, the polysulfide conversion kinetic can be greatly accelerated. Therefore, the MoS2/S cathode shows excellent electrochemical performance.

Fig. 4
figure 4

a EIS of the MoS2/S and pure S cathode. b Cycling performance of MoS2/S cathode at 2 C for 300 cycles

To further demonstrate the superior performance of the MoS2/S cathode, rate capabilities were tested. As shown in Fig. 5a, the as-prepared MoS2/S cathode delivers capacities of 1512, 1408, 1316, 1126, 965, and 816 mAh/g at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 C, respectively, demonstrating excellent rate performance with high current densities. This is attributed to the improved electronic conductivity and enhanced polysulfide conversion. Figure 5b shows the schematic illustration of the MoS2 nanosheet for accelerating the polysulfide conversion. It can be seen that the MoS2 nanosheet could provide sufficient surface area as active sites for accelerating the polysulfide conversion. This is related to the catalysts effect of the MoS2 nanosheet, which could enhance the polysulfide conversion kinetic during the electrochemical cycles. Furthermore, the long-term cycling performance of MoS2/S cathode with high S loading of 3.6 mg cm−2 was tested at 1 C for 300 cycles. As shown in Fig. 5c, it can be seen that the MoS2/S cathode still has capacity of 716 mAh/g, indicating excellent cycling performance under high S loading.

Fig. 5
figure 5

a Rate performance of the MoS2/S and pure S cathode. b Schematic illustration of the MoS2 nanosheet for accelerating the polysulfide conversion. c Long-term cycling performance of MoS2/S cathode at 1 C with high S loading

Conclusion

In conclusion, we report the employment of metal sulfide MoS2 as catalysts to promote the polysulfide conversion. The MoS2 samples show perfect crystal structure and morphology, which is beneficial for the use in the lithium-sulfur batteries. When used as cathode materials in Li–S batteries, the electrochemical results indicate that the MoS2/S cathode delivers high specific capacity and stable cycling performance. It shows high initial specific capacity of 1536 mAh/g at the current density of 0.1 C, which is much higher than the reported cathode materials. The excellent electrochemical performance is attributed to the presence of the metal sulfide, which could accelerate the polysulfide conversion and improve the whole electronic conductivity. This work provides new insights to enhance the electrochemical performance by using metal sulfide as sulfur matrix for high-performance lithium-sulfur batteries.