Abstract
Graphene oxide is well known as a new kind of functional materials because of its super-high specie surface area, mechanical strength, as well as excellent amphipathicity. In this article, graphene oxide was further sulfonated via substitution reaction with diazo salt of sulfanilic in order to endow graphene oxide with better ion exchange capacity and proton conductivity. The microstructure and morphology of the obtained sulfonated graphene oxide were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectra, and TEM, while the sulfonation of graphene oxide was confirmed by energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) spectra. As expected, ion exchange capacity and proton conductivity of sulfonated graphene oxide increased by about 0.589 and 33.6 times than those of graphene oxide, respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Graphene is well known as a new type of two-dimensional functional carbon materials, and it possesses some unique properties such as super-high electronic and thermal conductivity, excellent mechanical strength, Hall effect, and so on due to its unique perfect two-dimensional (2D) planar microstructure [1–3]. Therefore, graphene exhibits wide applications in varied fields [4–10]. Graphene oxide is an intermediate during the synthesis of graphene by oxidation-reduction method [11]. On the one hand, graphene oxide consists of pseudo 2D planar nanosheets similar to those of graphene. As a result, graphene oxide also possesses high mechanical property and large surface area. On the other hand, to be different, there exist some oxygen-containing groups within graphene oxide, such as epoxy and hydroxyl groups at basal plane and carbonyl and carboxylic groups at the edge, as shown in Fig. 1. Resultantly, graphene oxide has higher amphipathicity and reactivity than graphene [12, 13], thus making graphene oxide as more suitable filler to reinforce the mechanical strength of the substrates than graphene [14]. Additionally, these functional groups can negatively affect the electron conductivity as well as thermal stability of graphene oxide, that is, these functional groups can decrease its electron conductivity and thermal stability [15]. For example, graphene is well known to be the highest electron conductor, while graphene oxide is a good electron insulator. Recently, in order to improve its thermal stability, dispersibility, and compatibility with other substrates, graphene oxide was further functionalized [16, 17].
Sulfonated acid group is an important functional group. With the help of the solvation effect, it can dissociate the movable proton for ionic conductivity. Compared with the carboxyl group, sulfonated acid group is more efficient to dissociate the movable protons and to endow the substrate with higher ionic exchange capacity due to its stronger acidity [18, 19]. No doubt, functionalization of graphene oxide with sulfonated acid group will result in better ion exchange capacity as well as the proton conductivity. In principle, together with high mechanical strength and electronic insulator capacity of graphene oxide, sulfonation can make the graphene oxide as a promising multifunctional filler. In this work, sulfonation of graphene oxide was carried out: graphene oxide was sulfonated via reaction with diazo salt of sulfanilic acid, and XRD, Raman, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), TEM, and energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) were used to probe the microstructure-property relationship of sulfonated graphene oxide.
Experimental
Materials
Graphite powders, 98 % H2SO4, NaNO3, KMnO4, H2O2, HCl, NaOH, and p-aminobenzenesulfonic acid were purchased from Yunnan Keyi Chemical Glass Limited company and used as received without further being purified.
Preparation and functionalization of graphene oxide
Graphene oxide was prepared by modified Hummers method as follows: firstly, 5 g graphite powders and 2 g NaNO3 were added into 120 mL 98 % H2SO4, which was stirred for 30 min in the ice bath and followed by the addition of 20 g KMnO4. After stirring for another 60 min, the color of the mixture became dark green and the mixture was kept at 40 °C for 90 min. The mixture was diluted by adding 240 mL deionized water many times, during which the temperature was controlled below 98 °C. Then, 5 % H2O2 was added into the mixture until no gas was produced; as a result, the color of the mixture changed from dark green to gold yellow. Finally, the hot mixture was filtered and washed by 5 % HCl solution and deionized water, respectively.
Five grams of p-aminobenzenesulfonic acid was dissolved into 50 mL 10 % NaOH solution. After being cooled to room temperature, 2 g NaNO2 was added into the solution. Under the condition of ice bath, this solution was dropped into 10 mL concentrated HCl, and white crystal was produced. After being filtered, the white crystal was added into graphene oxide solution for sulfonation reaction in the ice bath. Finally, the brown gel of sulfonated graphene oxide can be obtained by washing with deionized water many times. For further characterization, powder-like or paper-like sulfonated graphene oxide can be also obtained by the following treatment.
Characterization of sulfonated graphene oxide
XRD patterns of the samples were obtained with a Rigaku X-3000 X-ray (λ = 0.154 nm) powder diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation with a Ni filter. The scan range was from 5 to 80°, and the scan rate was 5°/min. TEM analysis was carried out on a JEM-2100 microscope at 100 kV. Synchronous elemental analysis was performed with an EDX spectroscope (Oxford INCA). Raman characterizations of the samples were carried out on Laser Raman spectrometer (785 nm Renishaw invia). FTIR spectrum was collected on Nicolet Avatar 370 equipped with DTGS detector and ZnSe crystal (45°) as attenuated total reflection accessory (ATR) (resolution 4 cm−1, wave number 400 ∼ 2000 cm−1). The ion exchange capacity (IEC) of the sample was determined by titration as follows: (i) the dry sample with a given weight was immersed in 0.1 M NaCl solution for ion exchange at room temperature for 24 h, (ii) the resultant HCl in the mixture was titrated with 0.1 M NaOH solution, and (iii) IEC was calculated using the dry weight of the sample and the mole number of exchanged protons. The proton conductivity of the sample along the direction parallel to the membrane plane was obtained from AC impedance spectroscopy in the frequency range from 100 to 100 KHz with oscillating voltage of 10 mV, as reported elsewhere [20]. The paper-like sample was sandwiched between two Teflon plates with platinum wires as the electrodes and measured at room temperature on the potentiostat (Princeton Park 4000).
Results and discussion
Sulfonation reaction mechanism of graphene oxide
Diazonium salts are a kind of materials with a very high reactive diazo group (–N=N+). Compared with aliphatic diazonium salt, phenyldiazonium salt is more useful due to its higher stability. Generally speaking, in the case of phenyldiazonium salt, there are two kinds of reactions: (i) diazotization reaction, that is, diazo group can be substituted by some groups such as –H, –OH, –X, –CN, and –NO2. Therefore, phenyldiazonium salts are also called as aromatic “Grignard” reagents. (ii) Coupling reaction with arylamine or phenol. Obviously, sulfonation of graphene oxide in this work was achieved via substitution reaction of graphene oxide and diazo salt of sulfanilic acid, in which diazo group may be substituted with –OH within graphene oxide. Diazo salt of sulfanilic acid can be easily obtained via the reaction of p-aminobenzenesulfonic acid with HNO2 at the temperature from 0 to 5 °C in alkaline medium, as described in the “Experimental” section.
XRD
As shown in Fig. 2, the microstructures of graphite, graphene oxide, and sulfonated graphene oxide were characterized by XRD method. It was found that graphite exhibited a sharp strong diffraction peak at 2θ = 26.5° and a weak peak at 2θ = 55°, which are corresponding to (002) and (004) crystal planes of graphite, respectively. Especially, the former was widely considered as characteristic of graphite [21]. When it was oxidized to be graphene oxide, the diffraction peak at 2θ = 26° shifted left to 2θ = 10.6°, indicating the expanded interlayer spacing by the incorporation of some oxygen-containing spacers such as epoxy, carboxyl, and carbonyl [21]. At the same time, the weak peak at 2θ = 55° disappeared. In the case of XRD pattern of sulfonated graphene oxide, there was no significant difference from that of graphene oxide, indicating that the introduction of sulfonated acid groups did not greatly affect the crystal structure of graphene.
Raman characterization
The microstructures of the samples were further characterized by nondestructive Raman spectroscopy, as shown in Fig. 3. It can be seen that graphite exhibited only G peak at 1570 cm−1, indicating regular microstructure of graphite. In the case of graphene oxide, G peaks became wider and shifted right to 1590 cm−1. Additionally, a new peak at about 1357 cm−1 appeared, corresponding to D peak, meaning that part of sp2 hybrid carbon atoms of graphene oxide changed into sp3 hybrid carbon atoms, that is, C=C double bonds were broken after oxidation [22]. Furthermore, the strength ratio of G peak to D peak stood for the ratio of sp2 hybrid carbon atom to sp3 hybrid carbon atoms. Similar to XRD results, sulfonated graphene oxide did not exhibit significant changes compared to graphene oxide.
FTIR spectra
Figure 4 showed FTIR spectra between 400 and 2000 cm−1 of graphite, graphene oxide, and sulfonated graphene oxide. Obviously, graphite did not exhibit interesting signals expect for one peak at 1620 cm−1, which can be assigned to the stretching vibration of double bond C=C [23]. In the case of graphene oxide, beside the peak at 1620 cm−1 as mentioned above, it also exhibited other signals corresponding to oxygen-containing groups. For example, the peak at about 1731 cm−1 was resulted from the stretching vibration of carbonyl group (–C=O), and the peaks at 1410 cm−1 was due to the bending vibration of –OH in H2O adsorbed in graphene oxide; the peak at about 1100 cm−1 was from the stretching vibration of ether group (C–O–C) [24]. After further functionalization by sulfonation, sulfonated graphene oxide exhibited some new additional peaks at about 650 and 790 cm−1 corresponding to aromatic ring and the peaks at 1076, 1124, and 1209 cm−1 corresponding to sulfonated acid group [25]. Obviously, from FTIR spectra, it can be confirmed that graphite was oxidized and further sulfonated successfully.
TEM
TEM is a common technology to probe the micromorphology of sample, and synchronous elemental analysis can be also performed to explore the element component of the samples by combining EDX with TEM technology. Here, such an effort was made in order to gain the insight into the micromorphology as well as element ingredient of graphene oxide and sulfonated graphene oxide, as shown in Fig. 5. Obviously, graphene oxide exhibited transparent wrinkled voile-like morphology, indicating that graphene oxide consisted of one or a few layer of nanosheets. Likewise, sulfonation did not significantly affect the morphology of graphene oxide, either. To be interesting, EDX spectra provided convictive evidences of sulfonation of graphene oxide. As shown in Fig. 5c, d, compared to graphene oxide, sulfonated graphene oxide exhibited not only the signals of C and O but also the signal of sulfur element from sulfonated acid group, indicating the successful sulfonation of graphene oxide. This point was in good agreement with FTIR spectra.
Ion exchange capacity and proton conductivity
The effect of sulfonated acid groups on ion exchange capacity of graphene oxide was evaluated by titration method, as listed in Table 1. Ion exchange capacities of graphite, graphene oxide, and sulfonated graphene oxide were 0, 1.12, and 1.78 meq, respectively. As expected, graphene oxide exhibited higher ion exchange capacity than graphite due to the presence of –COOH and –OH. After sulfonation, ion exchange capacity of sulfonated graphene oxide further increased by 58.9 %, attributed to sulfonated acid groups. Furthermore, the proton conductivity of dry paper-like samples was also measured at room temperature, as listed in Table 1. The absolute values of proton conductivity of the samples seemed low, possibly depending on the experimental conditions such as dry sample and low temperature. Interestingly, the proton conductivity of sulfonated graphene oxide also exhibited about 34.6 times of that of graphene oxide. These results also confirmed successful grafting of sulfonated acid groups onto graphene oxide via substitution reaction with diazo salt of sulfanilic.
Conclusions
Sulfonated graphene oxide was prepared via substitution reaction of graphene oxide with diazo salt of sulfanilic. The as-synthesized sulfonated graphene oxide displayed transparent wrinkled voile-like morphology. Especially, sulfonated graphene oxide exhibited higher ionic performances (such as ion exchange capacity and proton conductivity) than graphene oxide, indicating promising applications in many fields such as water treatment and energy.
References
Katsnelson MI, Fasolino A (2013) Accoun Chem Res 46:97–105
Zhang YB, Tan YW, Stormer HL, Kim P (2005) Nature 438:201–204
Geim AK (2009) Science 324:1530–1534
Choi HJ, Jung SM, Seo JM, Chang DW, Dai L, Baek JB (2012) Nano Energy 1:534–551
Cai D, Wang S, Lian P, Zhu XF, Li D, Yang W, Wang H (2013) Electrochim Acta 90:492–497
Gan L, Guo H, Wang Z, Li X, Peng W, Wang J, Huang S, Su M (2013) Electrochim Acta 104:117–123
Kady E, Strong MF, Dubin VS, Kaner RB (2012) Science 335:1326–1330
Wu S, He Q, Tan C, Wang Y, Zhang H (2013) Small 22:1160–1172
Wan X, Long G, Huang L, Chen Y (2011) Adv Mater 23:5342–5358
Jwan A, Chuchmala A (2012) Prog Polym Sci 37:1805–1828
Kim J, Cote LJ, Kim F, Yuan W, Shull KR, Huang J (2010) J Am Chem Soc 132:8180–8186
Zhu BY, Murali S, Cai WW, Li XS, Suk JW, Potts JR, Ruoff RS (2010) Adv Mater 22:3906–3924
Li YJ, Cao W, Ci LJ, Wang CM, Ajayan PM (2010) Carbon 48:1124–1130
Yuan T, Pu L, Huang Q, Zhang H, Li X, Yang H (2014) Electrochim Acta 117:393–397
Kuila T, Bose S, Mishra AK, Khanra P, Kim NH, Lee JK (2012) Polym Test 31:31–38
Stankovich S, Piner RD, Nguyen ST, Ruoff RS (2006) Carbon 44:3342–3347
Compton OC, Dikin DA, Putz KW, Brison LC, Nguyen ST (2010) Adv Mater 22:892–896
Hou HY, Vacandio F, Di Vona ML, Knauth P (2013) J Appl Polym Sci 129:1151–1156
Hou HY, Di Vona ML, Knauth P (2012) J Membr Sci 423–424:113–127
Hou HY, Polinia R, Di Vona ML, Liu X, Sgreccia E, Chailan J, Knauth P (2013) In J Hydrogen Energy 38:3346–3351
Lee DC, Yang HN, Park SH, Kim WJ (2014) J Membr Sci 452:20–28
Jang JH, Pham VH, Hur SH, Chung JS, Colloid Interface J (2014) Science 424:62–66
Bissessur R, Scully SF (2007) Solid State Ionics 178:877–882
Dideykin A, Aleksenskiy AE, Kirilenko D, Brunkov P, Goncharov V, Baidakova M, Sakseev D, Vul AY (2011) Diamond Related Mater 20:105–108
Hou HY, Vacandio F, Di Vona ML, Knauth P (2012) Electrochim Acta 81:58–63
Acknowledgments
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51363011 and No. 51202242); the 46th Scientific Research Foundation for the Returned Overseas Chinese Scholars, State Education Ministry in China (6488–20130039); the Program of High-level Introduced Talent of Yunnan Province (10978125), the Yunnan Project of Training Talent (1418425); and the Project of Key Discipline (14078232 and 14078311).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hou, H., Hu, X., Liu, X. et al. Sulfonated graphene oxide with improved ionic performances. Ionics 21, 1919–1923 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-014-1355-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-014-1355-1