Abstract and Key Results
-
Penrose’s legacy is a curious one. Much cited, but little read, her work is recognized as one of the main intellectual foundations for modern resource based theories of business strategy and theories of organizational routines and capabilities.
-
However, Penrose did not aim to contribute to the field of strategy; her goal was to advance understanding of the nature of the firm and its growth. Nevertheless, there are important insights in Penrose’s work that have implications for international business and for strategy.
-
We discuss some of the implications of Penrose’s work as well as its limitations. We also briefly discuss the usefulness of adopting a “Penrosean” capability perspective in multinational enterprise (MNE) strategy analysis.
-
The dynamic capabilities framework puts entrepreneurial management into the theory of multinational enterprise, a task Penrose left untouched.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Alchian, A., Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory, Journal of Political Economy, 58,3, 1950, pp. 211–222.
Alchian, A., Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm: Comment, American Economic Review, 43,4, 1953, pp. 600–603.
Bartlett, C./ Ghoshal, S., Managing Across Borders: The Transnational Solution, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 1989.
Chesbrough, H./ Rosenbloom, R. S., The Role of the Business Model in Capturing Value from Innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation’s Technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11,3, 2002, pp. 529–555.
Chesbrough, H., Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Boston: Harvard Business School Press 2003.
Christensen, C. M., The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press 1997.
Collis, D. J., Research Note: How Valuable are Organisational Capabilities?, Strategic Management Journal, 15, Winter Special Issue, 1994, pp. 143–152.
Cyert, R./ March, J.G., A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall 1963.
D’Aveni, R. A./ Gunther, R., Hypercompetition: Managing the Dynamics of Strategic Maneuvering, New York: The Free Press 1994.
Dunning, J. H., The Contribution of Edith Penrose to International Business Scholarship, Management International Review, 43,1, 2003, pp. 3–19.
Hood, N./ Young, S., The Economics of Multinational Enterprise, London: Longman 1979.
Jacobides, M., The Architecture of Organizational Capabilities, Industrial and Corporate Change, forthcoming.
Knight, F., Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin 1921.
Langlois, R., Transactions-cost Economics in Real Time, Industrial and Corporate Change, 1,1, 1992, pp. 99–127.
Langlois, R./ Cosgel, M., Frank Knight on Risk, Uncertainty, and the Firm, Economic Inquiry, 31,3, 1993, pp. 456–465.
Loasby, B., Choice, Complexity and Ignorance, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1976.
Loasby, B., The Mind and Method of the Economist, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar 1989.
March, J.G./ Simon, H.A., Organizations, New York: Wiley 1958.
Marshall, A., Principles of Economics, London: McMillan 1925.
Marris, R.L., The Economic Theory of Managerial Capitalism. New York: Free Press of Glencoe 1964.
Mintzberg, H., The Rise and Fall of Strategic Planning, New York: Free Press 1994.
Nelson, R./ Winter, S.G., An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge: Belknap Press 1982.
Penrose, E., Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm, American Economic Review, 42,6, 1952, pp. 804–819.
Penrose, E., Biological Analogies in the Theory of the Firm: Rejoinder, American Economic Review, 43,4, 1953, pp. 603–609.
Penrose, E. T., The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, 3rd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press 1959/1995.
Penrose, E., The Growth of the Firm: A Case Study: The Hercules Powder Company, Business History Review 34,1, 1960, pp. 1–23.
Penrose, P./ Pitelis, C. N., Edith Elura Tilton Penrose: Life, Contribution and Influence, Contributions to Political Economy, 18,1, 1999, pp. 3–22.
Pitelis, C., A Theory of the (Growth of the) Transnational Firm: A Penrosian Perspective, Contributions to Political Economy. 19, 2000, p. 71–79.
Pitelis, C. N. (ed.), The Growth of the Firm: The Legacy of Edith Penrose, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2002.
Pitelis, C. N., Edith Penrose and the Resource-based View of (International) Business Strategy, International Business Review, 13,4, 2004, pp. 523–532.
Pitelis, C., A Note on Cyert and March (1963) and Penrose (1959): A Case for Synergy, Organization Science Special Issue, ‘A Behavioral Theory of the Firm? 40 Years and Counting’, Submission 2006.
Rugman, A./ Verbeke, A., A Final Word on Edith Penrose, Journal of Management Studies, 41,1, 2004, pp. 205–217.
Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., A Note on the Transnational Solution and the Transaction Cost Theory of Multinational Strategic Management, Journal of International Business Studies, 23,4, 1992, pp.761–71.
Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., Subsidiary-specific Advantages in Multinational Enterprises, Strategic Management Journal, 22,3, 2001, pp. 237–250.
Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., Edith Penrose’s Contribution to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 23, 2002, pp. 769–780.
Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., Extending the Theory of the Multinational Enterprise: Internalization and Strategic Management Perspectives, Journal of International Business Studies, 34,2, 2003, pp. 125–137.
Rugman, A. M./ Verbeke, A., A Perspective on Regional and Global Strategies of Multinational Enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies, 35,1, 2004, pp. 3–18.
Rumelt, R., Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm, in Lamb, R. B. (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1984.
Rumelt, R./ Schendel, D./ Teece, D., Introduction, in Rumelt, R./ Schendel, D./ Teece, D. (eds.), Fundamental Issues in Strategy, Boston: Harvard Business School Press 1994.
Schumpeter, J., The Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1934.
Simon, H. A., Organizations and Markets, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5,2, 1991, pp. 25–44.
Simon, H.A., Strategy and Organizational Evolution, Strategic Management Journal, 14, Winter Special Issue, 1993, pp. 131–142.
Teece, D., The Market for Know-how and the Efficient International Transfer of Technology, The Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 458, 1981, pp. 81–96.
Teece, D., Towards an Economic Theory of the Multiproduct Firm, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3,1, 1982, pp. 39–63.
Teece, D., Managing Intellectual Capital, Oxford: Oxford University Press 2000.
Teece, D., Reflections on the Hymer Thesis, International Business Review, 15,2, 2006, pp. 124–139.
Teece, D., Explicating Dynamic Capabilities, Seminar held at the Judge Business School, Cambridge May 2006.
Teece, D./ Pisano, G., The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction, Industrial and Corporate Change, 3,3, 1994, pp. 537–556.
Teece, D./ Pisano, G./ Shuen, A., Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 18,7, 1997, pp. 537–533.
Uzawa, H., Time Preference and the Penrose Effect in a Two-Class Model of Economic Growth, Journal of Public Economy, 77,4, 1969, pp. 628–652.
Wernerfelt, B., A Resource-based View of the Firm, Strategic Management Journal, 5,2, 1984, pp. 171–180.
Williamson, O. E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, New York: Free Press 1975.
Williamson, O. E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press 1985.
Winter, S., Understanding Dynamic Capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 24,10, 2003, pp. 991–995.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Augier, M., Teece, D.J. Dynamic capabilities and multinational enterprise: Penrosean insights and omissions. MANAGE. INT. REV. 47, 175–192 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-007-0010-8