Abstract
We review winner-loser models, the currently popular explanation for the occurrence of linear dominance hierarchies, via a three-part approach. (1) We isolate the two most significant components of the mathematical formulation of three of the most widely-cited models and rigorously evaluate the components’ predictions against data collected on hierarchy formation in groups of hens. (2) We evaluate the experimental support in the literature for the basic assumptions contained in winner-loser models. (3) We apply new techniques to the hen data to uncover several behavioral dynamics of hierarchy formation not previously described. The mathematical formulations of these models do not show satisfactory agreement with the hen data, and key model assumptions have either little or no conclusive support from experimental findings in the literature. In agreement with the latest experimental results concerning social cognition, the new behavioral dynamics of hierarchy formation discovered in the hen data suggest that members of groups are intensely aware both of their own interactions as well as interactions occurring among other members of their group. We suggest that more adequate models of hierarchy formation should be based upon behavioral dynamics that reflect more sophisticated levels of social cognition.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Addison, W.E., Simmel, E.C., 1970. The relationship between dominance and leadership in a flock of ewes. Bull. Psychon. Soc. 15, 303–05.
Bakker, T.C.M., Sevenster, P., 1983. Determinants of dominance in male sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus L). Behaviour 86, 55–1.
Bakker, T.C.M., Feuthdebruijn, E., Sevenster, P., 1989. Asymmetrical effects of prior winning and losing on dominance in sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Ethology 82, 224–29.
Barkan, C.P.L., Craig, J.L., Strahl, S.D., Stewart, A.M., Brown, J.L., 1986. Social-dominance in communal Mexican Jays Aphelocoma ultramarina. Anim. Behav. 34, 175–87.
Beacham, J.L., 1988. The relative importance of body size and aggressive experience as determinants of dominance in pumpkinseed sunfish Lepomis gibbosus. Anim. Behav. 36, 621–23.
Beacham, J.L., 2003. Models of dominance hierarchy formation: Effects of prior experience and intrinsic traits. Behaviour 140, 1275–303.
Beacham, J.L., Newman, J.A., 1987. Social experience and the formation of dominance relationships in the pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus. Anim. Behav. 35, 1560–563.
Beaugrand, J.P., Cotnoir, P.A., 1996. The role of individual differences in the formation of triadic dominance orders of male green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri). Behav. Process. 38, 287–96.
Beecher, M.D., Campbell, S.E., 2005. The role of unshared songs in singing interactions between neighbouring song sparrows. Anim. Behav. 70, 1297–304.
Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.-L., 1996. Mathematical model of self-organizing hierarchies in animal societies. Bull. Math. Biol. 58, 661–17.
Bonabeau, E., Theraulaz, G., Deneubourg, J.-L., 1999. Dominance orders in animal societies: the self-organization hypothesis revisited. Bull. Math. Biol. 61, 727–57.
Bond, A.B., Kamil, A.C., Balda, R.P., 2003. Social complexity and transitive inference in corvids. Anim. Behav. 65, 479–87.
Broom, M., Cannings, C., 2002. Modelling dominance hierarchy formation as a multi-player game. J. Theor. Biol. 219, 397–13.
Brown, J.A., Colgan, P.W., 1986. Individual and species recognition in centrarchid fishes: evidence and hypotheses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 373–79.
Burke, T.E., 1979. An Analysis of Social Behaviour in Crickets. University of Oxford, Oxford.
Chase, I.D., 1974. Models of hierarchy formation in animal societies. Behav. Sci. 19, 374–82.
Chase, I.D., 1982. Behavioral sequences during dominance hierarchy formation in chickens. Science 216, 439–40.
Chase, I.D., 1985. The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation—an application of the jigsaw puzzle approach. Anim. Behav. 33, 86–00.
Chase, I.D., 2006. Music notation: a new method for visualizing social interaction in animals and humans. Front. Zool. 3, 18.
Chase, I.D., Rohwer, S., 1987. Two methods for quantifying the development of dominance hierarchies in large groups with applications to Harris’ sparrows. Anim. Behav. 35, 1113–128.
Chase, I.D., Bartolomeo, C., Dugatkin, L.A., 1994. Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning. Anim. Behav. 48, 393–00.
Chase, I.D., Tovey, C., Spangler-Martin, D., Manfredonia, M., 2002. Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99, 5744–749.
Chase, I.D., Tovey, C., Murch, P., 2003. Two’s company, three’s a crowd: differences in dominance relationships in isolated versus socially embedded pairs of fish. Behaviour 140, 1193–217.
Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., 1990. How Monkeys See the World: Inside the Mind of Another Species. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cheney, D.L., Seyfarth, R.M., 2007. Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
Cloutier, S., Beaugrand, J.P., Lague, P.C., 1996. The role of individual differences and patterns of resolution in the formation of dominance orders in domestic hen triads. Behav. Process. 38, 227–39.
Clutton-Brock, T.H., Albon, S.D., Guinness, F.E., 1984. Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex-ratios in red deer. Nature 308, 358–60.
D’Eath, R.B., Keeling, L.J., 2003. Social discrimination and aggression by laying hens in large groups: from peck orders to social tolerance. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 84, 197–12.
D’Ettorre, P., Heinze, J., 2005. Individual recognition in ant queens. Curr. Biol. 15, 2170–174.
Davis, H., 1992. Transitive inference in rats (Rattus norvegicus). J. Comp. Psychol. 106, 342–49.
Doreian, P., 2006. Actor network utilities and network evolution. Soc. Netw. 28, 137–64.
Drews, C., 1993. The concept and definition of dominance in animal behavior. Behaviour 125, 283–13.
Drummond, H., 2006. Dominance in vertebrate broods and litters. Q. Rev. Biol. 81, 3–2.
Drummond, H., Canales, C., 1998. Dominance between booby nestlings involves winner and loser effects. Anim. Behav. 55, 1669–676.
Drummond, H., Osorno, J.L., 1992. Training siblings to be submissive losers: dominance between booby nestlings. Anim. Behav. 44, 881–93.
Dugatkin, L.A., 1997. Winner and loser effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav. Ecol. 8, 583–87.
Dugatkin, L.A., 2001. Bystander effects and the structure of dominance hierarchies. Behav. Ecol. 12, 348–52.
Dugatkin, L.A., Earley, R.L., 2003. Group fusion: the impact of winner, loser, and bystander effects on hierarchy formation in large groups. Behav. Ecol. 14, 367–73.
Dugatkin, L.A., Earley, R.L., 2004. Individual recognition, dominance hierarchies and winner and loser effects. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 271, 1537–540.
Earley, R.L., Dugatkin, L.A., 2002. Eavesdropping on visual cues in green swordtail (Xiphophorus helleri) fights: a case for networking. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 269, 943–52.
Ellis, L., 1995. Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: a cross-species comparison. Ethol. Sociobiol. 16, 257–33.
Francis, R.C., 1983. Experiential effects of agonistic behavior in the paradise fish, Macropodus opercularis. Behaviour 85, 292–13.
Francis, R.C., 1987. The interaction of genotype and experience in the dominance success of paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis). Biol. Behav. 12, 1–1.
Frey, D.F., Miller, R.J., 1972. The establishment of dominance relationships in blue gourami, Trichogaster trichopterus (Pallas). Behaviour 42, 8–2.
Gherardi, F., Atema, J., 2005. Memory of social partners in hermit crab dominance. Ethology 111, 271–85.
Gillian, D.J., 1981. Reasoning in the chimpanzee: II. Transitive inference. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 7, 87–08.
Goessmann, C., Hemelrijk, C., Huber, R., 2000. The formation and maintenance of crayfish hierarchies: behavioral and self-structuring properties. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48, 418–28.
Grosenick, L., Clement, T.S., Fernald, R.D., 2007. Fish can infer social rank by observation alone. Nature 445, 429–32.
Hausfater, G., Altmann, J., Altmann, S., 1982. Long-term consistency of dominance relations among female baboons (Papio cynocephalus). Science 217, 752–55.
Heinze, J., 1990. Dominance behavior among ant females. Naturwissenschaften 77, 41–3.
Hemelrijk, C.K., 1999. An individual orientated model of the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 266, 361–69.
Hemelrijk, C.K., 2000. Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Anim. Behav. 59, 1035–048.
Hogue, M.E., Beaugrand, J.P., Lague, P.C., 1996. Coherent use of information by hens observing their former dominant defeating or being defeated by a stranger. Behav. Process. 38, 241–52.
Holekamp, K.E., Smale, L., 1993. Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyenas: juvenile rank relations with other immature individuals. Anim. Behav. 46, 451–66.
Hsu, Y.Y., Wolf, L.L., 1999. The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim. Behav. 57, 903–10.
Jackson, W.M., 1988. Can individual differences in history of dominance explain the development of linear dominance hierarchies. Ethology 79, 71–7.
Jackson, W.M., Winnegrad, R.L., 1988. Linearity in dominance hierarchies: a second look at the individual attributes model. Anim. Behav. 36, 1237–240.
Johnstone, R.A., 2001. Eavesdropping and animal conflict. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 9177–180.
Karavanich, C., Atema, J., 1998. Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. Anim. Behav. 56, 1553–560.
Lai, W.-S., Ramiro, L.-L.R., Yu, H.A., Johnston, R.E., 2005. Recognition of familiar individuals in golden hamsters: a new method and functional neuroanatomy. J. Neurosci. 25, 11239–1247.
Landau, H.G., 1951. On dominance relations and structures of animal societies. Bull. Math. Biophys. 13, 1–9.
Lazareva, O.F., 2004. Transitive responding in hooded crow requires linearly ordered stimuli. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 82, 1–9.
Magnusson, D., Endler, N.S., 1977. Personality at the Crossroads, p. 464. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
McGregor, P.K., 2005. Animal Communication Networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
McLeman, M.A., Mendl, M., Jones, R.B., White, R., Wathes, C.M., 2005. Discrimination of conspecifics by juvenile domestic pigs, Sus scrofa. Anim. Behav. 70, 451–61.
Mesterton-Gibbons, M., Sherratt, T.N., 2007. Social eavesdropping: A game-theoretic analysis. Bull. Math. Biol. 69, 1255–276.
Nakamaru, M., Sasaki, A., 2003. Can transitive inference evolve in animals playing the hawk-dove game? J. Theor. Biol. 222, 461–70.
Nelissen, M.H.J., 1985. Structure of the dominance hierarchy and dominance determining group factors in Melanochromic auratus (Pices, Cichlidae). Behaviour 94, 85–07.
Oliveira, R.F., McGregor, P.K., Latruffe, C., 1998. Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 265, 1045–049.
Oliveira, R.F., Lopes, M., Carneiro, L.A., Canario, A.V.M., 2001. Watching fights raises fish hormone levels—Cichlid fish wrestling for dominance induce an androgen surge in male spectators. Nature 409, 475–75.
Paz-y-Mino, G., Bond, A.B., Kamil, A.C., Balda, R.P., 2004. Pinyon jays use transitive inference to predict social dominance. Nature 430, 778–81.
Post, W., 1992. Dominance and mating success in male boat-tailed grackles. Anim. Behav. 44, 917–29.
Raleigh, M.J., McGuire, M.T., Brammer, G.L., Pollack, D.B., Yuwiler, A., 1991. Serotonergic mechanisms promote dominance acquisition in adult male Vervet monkeys. Brain Res. 559, 181–90.
Roberts, W.A., Phelps, M.T., 1994. Transitive inference in rats—a test of the spatial coding hypothesis. Psychol. Sci. 5, 368–74.
Sapolsky, R.M., Share, L.J., 1994. Rank-related differences in cardiovascular function among wild baboons: role of sensitivity to glucocorticoids. Am. J. Primatol. 32, 261–75.
Savin-Williams, R.C., 1980. Dominance hierarchies in groups of middle to late adolescent males. J. Youth Adolesc. 9, 75–5.
Seitz, K., 2003. The dominance hierarchy as a supraindividual trait: historical perspectives and future directions. Master’s thesis, Binghamton University.
Skiena, S., 1990. Implementing Discrete Mathematics: Combinatorics and Graph Theory with Mathematica. Addison–Wesley, Reading.
Skvoretz, J., Faust, K., Fararo, T.J., 1996. Social, structure, networks, and E-state structuralism models. J. Math. Soc. 21, 57–6.
Slater, P.J.B., 1986. Individual-differences and dominance hierarchies. Anim. Behav. 34, 1264–265.
Steirn, J.N., Weaver, J.E., Zentall, T.R., 1995. Transitive inference in pigeons: Simplified procedures and a test of value transfer theory. Anim. Learn. Behav. 23, 76–2.
Tibbetts, E.A., 2002. Visual signals of individual identity in the wasp Polistes fuscatus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 269, 1423–428.
Todd, J.H., Attema, J., Bardach, J.E., 1967. Chemical communication in social behavior of a fish, the yellow bullhead (Ictalurus natalis). Science 158, 672–73.
Vannini, M., Sardini, A., 1971. Aggressivity and dominance in river crab Potomon fluviantile (Herbst). Monit. Zool. Ital. 5, 173–13.
von Fersen, L., Wynne, C.D., Delius, J.D., Staddon, J.E., 1991. Transitive inference formation in pigeons. J. Exp. Psychol. Anim. Behav. Process. 17, 334–41.
Wilson, E.O., 1975. Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
Yurkovic, A., Wang, O., Basu, A.C., Kravitz, E.A., 2006. Learning and memory associated with aggression in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 17519–27524.
Zucker, N., Murray, L., 1996. Determinants of dominance in the tree lizard Urosaurus ornatus: The relative importance of mass, previous experience and coloration. Ethology 102, 812–25.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lindquist, W.B., Chase, I.D. Data-Based Analysis of Winner-Loser Models of Hierarchy Formation in Animals. Bull. Math. Biol. 71, 556–584 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-008-9371-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-008-9371-9