Article PDF
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abrahamson, D. (2004). Embodied spatial articulation: A gesture perspective on student negotiation between kinesthetic schemas and epistemic forms in learning mathematics. In D. E. McDougall & J. A. Ross (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 791 – 797). Toronto, Ontario: Preney.
Abrahamson, D. (2006). The Three M’s: Imagination, Embodiment, and Mathematics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Jean Piaget Society, June, 2006, Baltimore, MD.
Alibali, M., Mitchel, N. (2011) Embodiment in Mathematics Teaching and Learning: Evidence from Learners’ and Teachers’ Gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1–40
Bahls, P. (2009). Math and metaphor: Using poetry to teach college mathematics. The WAC Journal 20.
Caper, R. (1996). Play, Experimentation And Creativity. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis. 77, 859–869.
Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. New York, NY: Perseus Book Group
Frank, K., Zhao, Y., & Boreman, K. (2004). Social Capital and the Implementation of Computers in Schools. Sociology of Education, 77(2), 148–171.
Fuson, K. C., & Abrahamson, D. (2005). Understanding ratio and proportion as an example of the Apprehending Zone and Conceptual-Phase problem-solving models. In J. Campbell (Ed.), Handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 213–234). New York: Psychology Press.
Gulbahar, Y (2007). Technology planning: A roadmap to successful technology integration in schools. Computers & Education, 49(4). 943–956.
Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 17(6), 560–565.
Lakoff, G., & Nunez, R. E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being: Basic Books.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2008). Introducing technological pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March 24-28. (Conference Presentation)
Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., & Henriksen, D. (2011). The seven trans-disciplinary habits of mind: Extending the tpack framework towards 21st century learning. Educational Technology, 11(2), 22–28.
Pink, D.H. (2005). A whole new mind. New York, NY: Riverhead Books.
Robinson, K. (2003). Mind the gap: The creative conundrum. Critical Quarterly, 43(1), 41–45.
Root-Bernstein, R.S. (1996). The sciences and arts share a common creative aesthetic. In: A. I. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 49–82). Netherlands: Kluwer.
Root-Bernstein, R.S, & Bernstein, M. (1999). Sparks of genius: The thirteen thinking tools of the world’s most creative people. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Spiro, R.J., Feltovich, P.J., Jacobson, M.J., & Coulson, D.K. (1995). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structure domains. Educational Technology, 31 (5), 24–33.
Ureta, N. (2012). Kinecting With Students: UW Bothell students and faculty get creative with math education. The Daily of the University of Washington. (January 5th, 2012) Retrieved from: http://dailyuw.com/news/2012/jan/04/kinectingstudents/
Yardi, S. and boyd, d. (2010). “Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization over Time on Twitter.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 30(5), 316–327.
Wilensky, U. (1997). What is normal anyway?: Therapy for epistemological anxiety. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(2), 171–202.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Additional information
The Deep-Play Research group at the college of education at Michigan State University includes: Punya Mishra, Danah Henriksen, Kristen Kereluik, Laura Terry, Chris Fahnoe and Colin Terry.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mishra, P., the Deep-Play. Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century: Crayons are the Future. TECHTRENDS TECH TRENDS 56, 13–16 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0594-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-012-0594-0