Abstract
Exploring the relationships between landscape pattern and ecological processes is the key topic of landscape ecology, for which, a large number of indices as well as landscape pattern analysis model were developed. However, one problem faced by landscape ecologists is that it is hard to link the landscape indices with a specific ecological process. Linking landscape pattern and ecological processes has become a challenge for landscape ecologists. “Source” and “sink” are common concepts used in air pollution research, by which the movement direction and pattern of different pollutants in air can be clearly identified. In fact, for any ecological process, the research can be considered as a balance between the source and the sink in space. Thus, the concepts of “source” and “sink” could be implemented to the research of landscape pattern and ecological processes. In this paper, a theory of sourcesink landscape was proposed, which include: (1) In the research of landscape pattern and ecological process, all landscape types can be divided into two groups, “source” landscape and “sink” landscape. “Source” landscape contributes positively to the ecological process, while “sink” landscape is unhelpful to the ecological process. (2) Both landscapes are recognized with regard to the specific ecological process. “Source” landscape in a target ecological process may change into a “sink” landscape as in another ecological process. Therefore, the ecological process should be determined before “source” or “sink” landscape were defined. (3) The key point to distinguish “source” landscape from “sink” landscape is to quantify the effect of landscape on ecological process. The positive effect is made by “source” landscape, and the negative effect by “sink” landscape. (4) For the same ecological process, the contribution of “source” landscapes may vary, and it is the same to the “sink” landscapes. It is required to determine the weight of each landscape type on ecological processes. (5) The sourcesink principle can be applied to non-point source pollution control, biologic diversity protection, urban heat island effect mitigation, etc. However, the landscape evaluation models need to be calibrated respectively, because different ecological processes correspond with different source-sink landscapes and evaluation models for the different study areas. This theory is helpful to further study landscape pattern and ecological process, and offers a basis for new landscape index design.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Apart A A, Raine S R, Paterson M S (2002). Mapping and analysis of changes in the ripariann landscape structure of the Lockyer Valley catchment, Queensland, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 59: 43–57
Baker W L, Cal Y (1992). The rule programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the grass geographical information system. Landscape Eeology, 7: 291–302
Cook E A (2002). Landscape structure indices for assessing urban ecological networks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58: 269–280
Chen L D, Li J R, Guo X D, Fu B J, Li G Q (2000). Temporal and spatial characteristics of surface water quality in Jiyun river. Environmental Science, 21(6): 61–64 (in Chinese)
Chen L D, Fu B J, Zhang S R, Qiu J, Yang F L, Guo X D (2002). A comparative study on the dynamics of non-point source pollution in a heterogeneous landscape. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22(6): 808–816 (in Chinese)
Chen L D, Fu B J, Zhang S R, Qiu J, Yang F L (2003a). Seasonal change of solvable nitrogen in surface water of Yuqiao reservoir basin. China Environmental Science, 23(2): 210–214 (in Chinese)
Chen L D, Fu B J, Xu J Y, Gong J (2003b). Location-weighted landscape contrast index: a scale independent approach for landscape pattern evaluation based on “source-sink” ecological processes. Acta Eeologica Sinica, 23(11): 2406–2413 (in Chinese)
Coper C B, Waiters J R (2002). Independent effects of woodland loss and fragmentation on Brown Treecreeper distribution. Biological Conservation, 105(1): 1–10
Deckers B, Hermy M, Muys B (2004). Factors affecting plant species composition of hedgerows: relative importance and hierarchy. Acta Oecologica, 26: 23–37
Domer B, Lertzman K, Fall J (2002). Landscape pattern in topegraphically complex landscapes: issues and techniques for analysis. Landscape Ecology, 17(7): 729–743
Evans R (2005). Monitoring water erosion in lowland England and Wales-a personal view of its history and outcomes. Catena, 64(2): 142–161
Fu B J, Chen L D, Ma K M, Wang Y L (2001). The Principle and Application of Landscape Ecology. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
Haase D and Halle L (2004). Development and perspectives of landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 19: 567–569
Haines-Young R, Chopping M (1996). Quantifying landscape structure: a review of landscape indices and their application to forested landscapes. Progress in Physical Geography, 20(4): 418–445
Hessel R, Messing I, Chen L D, Ritsema C, Stolte J (2003). Soil erosion simulations of land use scenarios for a small Loess Plateau catchment. Catena, 54(1–2): 289–302
Johnson C J, Boyce M S, Mulders R, Gunn A, Gau R J, Cluff H D, Case R L (2004). Quantifying patch distribution at multiple spatial scales: applications to wildlife-habitat models. Landacape Ecology, 19(8): 869–882
Li H B, Wu J G (2004). Use and misuse of landscape indices. Landscape Ecology, 19(4): 389–399
Nassauer J I, Corry R C (2004). Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 19(4): 343–356
Nearing M A, Jetten V, Bafaut C, et a1 (2005). Modeling response of soil erosion and runoff to changes in precipitation and cover. Catena, 61(2–3): 131–154
Ormml P, Foppen R, Vos C (2002). Bridging the gap between ecology and spatial planning in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology, 16: 767–779
O’Neillr R V, Krumme J R, Gardner R H, Sugihara G, Jackson B, DeAngelis D L, Milne B T, Turner M G, Zygmunt B, Christensen S W, Dale V H, Graham R L (1988). Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology, (1): 153–162
Pearson D M (2002). The application of local measures of spatial autocorrelation for describing pattern in north Australian landscapes. Journal of Environmental Management, 64: 85–95
Raines G L (2002). Description and comparison of geologic maps with FRAGSTATS-a spatial statistics program. Computers and Geoscienee, 28: 169–177
Stevens V M, Polus E, Wesselingh R A, Schtickzelle N, Baguette M (2004). Quantifying functional connectivity: experimental evidence for patch-specific resistence in the Natterjack toad (Bufo calamita). Landscape Ecology, 19(8): 829–842
Turner M G, Garder R H (1991). Quantitative methods in landscape ecology: an introduction. In:Turner M G eds. Quantitative methods in landacpe ecology. New York: Springer-Veflng, 13–14
Tisehendorf L (2001). Can landscape indices predict ecological processes consistently? Landscape Ecology, 16(3): 235–254
Wu J G (2000). Landscape Ecology-Pattern, Processes, Scale and Leve1. Beijing: Higher Education Press (in Chinese)
With K A, Crist T O (1995). Critical thresholds in species responses to landscape structure. Ecology, 76: 2446–2459
Xiao D N, Li X Z, Gao J (2003). Landscape Ecology. Beijing: Science Press (in Chinese)
Zeng H, Jiang Z Y, Kong N N, Gao L Y (2000). Auto-correlation analysis of landscape pattern for a fast urbanization area-a case study of Longhua area, Shenzhen City. Acta Soientiarum Natualium Unlversitatis Pekinensis, 36(6): 824–831 (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
__________
Translated from Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26(5): 1444–1449 [译自: 生态学报]
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Fu, B. & Zhao, W. Source-sink landscape theory and its ecological significance. Front. Biol. China 3, 131–136 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-008-0026-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11515-008-0026-x