Abstract
Thousands of plant and animal species have been observed to have superhydrophobic surfaces that lead to various novel behaviors. These observations have inspired attempts to create artificial superhydrophobic surfaces, given that such surfaces have multitudinous applications. Superhydrophobicity is an enhanced effect of surface roughness and there are known relationships that correlate surface roughness and superhydrophobicity, based on the underlying physics. However, while these examples demonstrate the level of roughness they tell us little about the independence of this effect in terms of its scale. Thus, they are not capable of explaining why such naturally occurring surfaces commonly have micron-submicron sizes. Here we report on the discovery of a new relation, its physical basis and its experimental verification. The results reveal that scaling-down roughness into the micro-submicron range is a unique and elegant strategy to not only achieve superhydrophobicity but also to increase its stability against environmental disturbances. This new relation takes into account the previously overlooked but key fact that the accumulated line energy arising from the numerous solid-water-air intersections that can be distributed over the apparent contact area, when air packets are trapped at small scales on the surface, can dramatically increase as the roughness scale shrinks. This term can in fact become the dominant contributor to the surface energy and so becomes crucial for accomplishing superhydrophobicity. These findings guide fabrication of stable super water-repellant surfaces.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Wenzel R N. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water. Ind Eng Chem, 1936, 28: 988–994
Cassie A B D, Baxter S. Wettability of porous surfaces. Trans Faraday Soc, 1944, 40: 546–551
Lafuma A, Quéré D. Superhydrophobic states. Nat Mater, 2003, 2: 457–460
Zheng Q S, Yu Y, Zhao Z H. Effects of hydraulic pressure on the stability and transition of wetting modes of superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2005, 21: 12207–12212
Yu Y, Zhao Z H, Zheng Q S. Mechanical and superhydrophobic stabilities of two-scale surfacial structure of lotus leaves. Langmuir, 2007, 23: 8212–8216
Lobaton E J, Salamon T R. Computation of constant mean curvature surfaces: Application to the gas-liquid interface of a pressurized fluid on a superhydrophobic surface. J Colloid Interface Sci, 2007, 314: 184–198
Bush J W M, Hu D L, Prakash M. The integument of water-walking arthropods: Form and function. Adv Insect Physiol, 2008, 34: 117–192
Blossey R. Self-cleaning surfaces-Virtual realities. Nat Mater, 2003, 2: 301–306
Shafrin E G, Zisman W A. In Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion. Advances in Chemistry series. In: Fowkes F M, ed. Washington D C: American Chemical Society, 1964. 43: 145–167
Bico J, Marzolin C, Quéré D. Pearl drops. Europhys Lett, 1999, 47: 220–226
Youngblood J P, McCarthy T J. Ultrahydrophobic polymer surfaces prepared by simultaneous ablation of polypropylene and sputtering of poly (tetrafluoroethylene) using radio frequency plasma. Macromolecules, 1999, 32: 6800–6806
Öner D, McCarthy T J. Ultrahydrophobic surfaces. Effects of topography length scales on wettability. Langmuir, 2000, 16: 7777–7782
Onda T, Shibuichi S, Satoh N, et al. Super-water-repellent fractal surfaces. Langmuir, 1996: 12, 2125–2127
Amirfazli A, Neumann A W. Status of the three-phase line tension. Adv Colloid Interface Sci, 2004, 110: 121–141
Christenson H K, Claesson P M. Cavitation and the interaction between macroscopic hydrophobic surfaces. Science, 1988, 239: 390–392
Carambassis A, Jonker L C, Attard P, et al. Force measured between hydrophobic surfaces due to a submicroscopic bridging bubble. Phys Rev Lett, 1998, 80: 5357–5360
Singh S, Houston J, Swol F, et al. Drying transition of confined water. Nature, 2006, 442: 526
Andersen N M. The Semiaquatic Bugs (Hemiptera, Gerromorphs): Phylogeny, Adaptations, Biogeography and Classification. Klampenborg, Denmark: Scandinavian Science Press Ltd., 1982
Gao X F, Jiang L. Water-repellent legs of water strider. Nature, 2004, 432: 36
Hu D L, Bush J W M. Meniscus-climbing inserts. Nature, 2005, 437: 733–736
Jung Y C, Bhushan B. Dynamic effects of bouncing water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 2008, 24: 6262–6269
Richard D, Clanet C, Quéré D. Contact time of a bouncing drop. Nature, 2002, 417: 811
Drelich J, Miller D J. Modification of the Cassie equation. Langmuir, 1993, 9: 619–621
Barthlott W, Neinhuis C. Purity of the sacred lotus, or escape from contamination in biological surfaces. Planta, 1997, 202: 1–8
Parker A R, Lawrence C R. Water capture by a desert beetle. Nature, 2001, 414: 33–34
Tuteja A, Choi W, Ma M, et al. Designing superhydrophobic surfaces. Science, 2007, 318: 1618–1622
Erbil H Y, Demirel A L, Avci Y, et al. Transformation of a simple plastic into a superhydrophobic surface. Science, 2003, 299: 1377–1380
Nealey P F, Black A J, Wilbur J L, Whitesides G M. Molecular electronics. Oxford: Blackwell Science, 1997
Aussillous P, Quéré D. Liquid marbles. Nature, 2001, 411: 924–927
Lahann J, Mitragotri S, Tran T-N, et al. A reversibly switching surface. Science, 2003, 299: 371–374
Courbin L, Denieul E, Dressaire E, et al. Imbibition by polygonal spreading on microdecorated surfaces. Nat Mater, 2007, 6: 661–664
Sanchez C, Arribart H, Guille M M G. Biomimetism and bioinspiration as tools for the design of innovative materials and systems. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 277–288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Recommended by HONG YouShi
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, Q., Lv, C., Hao, P. et al. Small is beautiful, and dry. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 53, 2245–2259 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-4172-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-010-4172-1