Abstract
The relative dispersion of the cloud droplet spectra or the shape parameter is usually assumed to be a constant in the two-parameter cloud microphysical scheme, or is derived through statistical analysis. However, observations have revealed that the use of such methods is not applicable for all actual cases. In this study, formulas were derived based on cloud microphysics and the properties of gamma function to solve the average cloud droplet radius and the cloud droplet spectral shape parameter. The gamma distribution shape parameter, relative dispersion, and cloud droplet spectral distribution can be derived through solving the droplet spectral shape parameter equation using the average droplet radius, volume radius, and their ratio, thereby deriving an analytic solution. We further examined the equation for the droplet spectral shape parameter using the observational droplet spectral data, and results revealed the feasibility of the method. In addition, when the method was applied to the two-parameter cloud microphysical scheme of the Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) model to further examine its feasibility, the modeling results showed that it improved precipitation simulation performance, thereby indicating that it can be utilized in two-parameter cloud microphysical schemes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Cohard J M, Pinty J P. 2000. A comprehensive two-moment warm microphysical bulk scheme. I: Description and tests. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 126: 1815–1842
Cotton W R, Anthes R A. 1989. Storm and Cloud Dynamics. London: Academic Press. 883
Curry J A, Hobbs P V, King M D, et al. 2000. FIRE arctic clouds experiment. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc, 81: 5–29
Ferrier B S. 1994. A double-moment multiple-phase four-class bulk ice scheme. Part I: Description. J Atmos Sci, 51: 249–280
IPCC. 2007. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, et al, eds. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jiang H L, Cotton W R, Pinto J O, et al. 2000. Cloud resolving simulations of mixed-phase arctic stratus observed during BASE: Sensitivity to concentration of ice crystals and large-scale heat and moisture advection. J Atmos Sci, 57: 2105–2117
Jiang H L, Feingold G, Cotton W R, et al. 2001. Large-eddy simulation of entrainment of cloud condensation nuclei into the arctic boundary layer: May 18, 1998 FIRE/SHEBA case study. J Geophys Res, 106: 15113–15122
Khairoutdinov M F, Kogan Y L. 2000. A new cloud physics parameterization for large-eddy simulation models of marine stratocumulus. Mon Weather Rev, 128: 229–243
Khvorostyanov V I, Curry J A. 1999a. Towards the theory of stochastic condensation in clouds. Part I: A general kinetic equation. J Atmos Sci, 56: 3985–3996
Khvorostyanov V I, Curry J A. 1999b. Towards the theory of stochastic condensation in clouds. Part II: Analytical solutions of the gamma distribution type. J Atmos Sci, 56: 3997–4013
Kogan Y L, Martin W J. 1994. Parameterization of bulk condensation in numerical cloud modeles. J Atmos Sci, 51: 1728–1739
Kogan Y L, Belochitski A, 2012. Parameterization of cloud microphysics based on full integral moments. J Atmos Sci, 69: 2229–2242
Liu Y G, Daum P H. 2002. Indirect warming effect from dispersion forcing. Nature, 419: 580–581
Liu Y G, Daum P H, McGraw R, et al. 2006a. Parameterization of the autoconversion process. Part II: Generalization of Sundqvist-type parameterizations. J Atmos Sci, 63: 1103–1109
Liu Y G, Daum P H, McGraw R, et al. 2006b. Generalized threshold function accounting for effect of relative dispersion on threshold behavior of autoconversion process. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L11804, doi: 10.1029/2005GL025500
Lohmann U, McFarlane N, Levkov L, et al. 1999. Comparing different cloud schemes of a single column model by using mesoscale forcing and nudging technique. J Clim, 12: 438–461
Lu M L, Conant W C, Jonsson H H, et al. 2007. The marine stratus/stratocumulus experiment (MASE): Aerosol-cloud relationship in marine stratocumulus. J Geophys Res, 112: D10209, doi: 10.1029/2006JD07985
Ma J Z, Chen Y, Wang W, et al. 2010. Strong air pollution causes widespread haze-cloud over China. J Geophys Res, 115: D18204, doi: 10.1029/2009JD013065
Martin G M, Johnson D W, Spice A, 1994. The measurement and parameterization of effective radius of droplets in the warm stratocumulus clouds. J Atmos Sci, 51: 1823–1842
Mason B J. 1971. Physics of Clouds. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 481
Meyers M P, Walko R L, Harrington J Y, et al. 1997. New RAMS cloud microphysics parameterization. Part II: The two-moment scheme. Atmos Res, 45: 3–39
Milbrandt J A, Yau M K. 2005a. A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part I: Analysis of the role of the spectral shape parameter. J Atmos Sci, 62: 3051–3064
Milbrandt J A, Yau M K. 2005b. A multimoment bulk microphysics parameterization. Part II: A proposed three-moment closure and scheme description. J Atmos Sci, 62: 3065–3081
Morrison H, Curry J A, Khvorostyanov V I. 2005. A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models Part I: Description. J Atmos Sci, 62: 1665–1677
Morrison H, Thompson G, Tatarskii V. 2009. Impact of cloud microphysics on the development of trailing stratiform precipitation in a simulated squall line: Comparison of one- and two-moment schemes. Mon Weather Rev, 137: 991–1007
Pruppacher H R, Klett J D. 1997. Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation. Heidelberg: Springer. 954
Pontikis C, Hicks E. 1992. Contribution to the cloud droplet effective radius parameterization. Geophys Res Lett, 19: 2227–2230, doi: 10.1029/92GL02283
Reisner J, Rasmussen R M, Bruintjes T. 1998. Explicit forecasting of supercooled liquid water in winter storms using the MM5 mesoscale model. Q J R Meteorol Soc, 124: 1071–1107
Sedunov Y S. 1974. Physics of Drop Formation in the Atmosphere. New York: Wiley. 234
Straka J M. 2009. Cloud and Precipitation Microphysics. New York: Cambridge University Press. 392
Twomey S. 1977. The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds. J Atmos Sci, 34: 1149–1152
Xie X N, Liu X D, Peng Y R, et al. 2013. Numerical simulation of clouds and precipitation depending on different relationships between aerosol and cloud droplet spectral dispersion. Tellus Ser B-Chem Phys Meteorol, 65: 19054
Xu K M, Randall D A. 1996. Explicit simulation of cumulus ensembles with the GATE Phase III data: Comparison with observations. J Atmos Sci, 53: 3710–3736
Zhao C S, Tie X X, Brasseur G, et al. 2006. Aircraft measurements of cloud droplet spectral dispersion and implications for indirect aerosol radiative forcing. Geophys Res Lett, 33: L16809, doi: 10.1029/2006GL026653
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, Y., Li, W. A method for solving relative dispersion of the cloud droplet spectra. Sci. China Earth Sci. 58, 929–938 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5059-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-015-5059-9