Abstract
This ethnographic study of a third grade classroom examined elementary school science learning as a sociocultural accomplishment. The research focused on how a teacher helped his students acquire psychological tools for learning to think and engage in scientific practices as locally defined. Analyses of classroom discourse examined both how the teacher used mediational strategies to frame disciplinary knowledge in science as well as how students internalized and appropriated ways of knowing in science. The study documented and analyzed how students came to appropriate scientific knowledge as their own in an ongoing manner tied to their identities as student scientists. Implications for sociocultural theory in science education research are discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Brown, B.A. (2004). Discursive identity: assimilation into the culture of science classroom and its implications for minority students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 810–834.
Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Duran, R., & Szymanski, M. (1995). Cooperative learning interaction and construction of activity. Discourse Processes, 19, 149–164.
Edwards, D. (1993). Concepts, memory, and the organization of pedagogical discourse: a case study. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 205–225.
Edwards, A.D., & Mercer, N. (1987). Common knowledge. London: Methuen.
Engeström, Y., & Miettinen, R. (1999). Introduction. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamaki (eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–16.
Erickson, F. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In M.D. LeCompte, W.L. Milroy, & J. Preissle (eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education. San Diego: Academic Press, pp. 202–224.
Gee, J.P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: theory and method. New York: Routledge.
Gumperz, J.J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti& C. Goodwin (eds.), Rethinking context. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229–252.
Kelly, G.J., & Green, J. (1998). The social nature of knowing: toward a sociocultural perspective on conceptual change and knowledge construction. In B. Guzzetti, & C. Hynd (eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: multiple ways to understand knowing and learning in a complex world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 145–181.
Kelly, G.J., Chen, C., & Crawford, T. (1998). Methodological considerations for studying science-in-the-making in educational settings. In: Wolf-Michael Roth, & Cam McRobbie (eds.), Science Education, 28(1), 23–49. Special Issue on Science and Technology Studies and Science Education.
Kelly, G.J., & Chen, C. (1999). The sound of music: constructing science as sociocultural practices through oral and written discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 883–915.
Kozulin, A. (1998). Psychological tools: a sociocultural approach to education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kozulin, A. (2003). Psychological tools and mediated learning. In: A. Kozulin, B. Gindis, V.S. Ageyev, & S. M. Miller (eds.), Vygotsky's educational theory in cultural context. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–38.
Lawson, A. (1982). The reality of general cognitive operations. Science Education, 66(2), 229–241.
Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Lemke, J.L. (2000). Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in ecosocial systems. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(4), 273–290.
Lemke, J.L. (2001). Articulating communities: sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.
Leontiev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Mortimer, E.F., & Scott, P.H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1991). Bibliography: students' alternative frameworks and science. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
Reveles, J.M., Cordova, R., & Kelly, G.J. (2004). Science literacy and academic identity formulation. Journal for Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1111–1144.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science educationas/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.
Roth, W-.M., & Duit, R. (2005). Emergence, flexibility, and stabilization of language in a physics classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 869–897.
Spradley, J.P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Sutton, C. (1996). Beliefs about science and beliefs about language. International Journal of Science, 18, 1–18.
Tudge, J. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: implications of classroom practice. In L. Moll (ed.), Vygotsky and education. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Tyson, L.M., Venville, G.J., Harrison, A.G., & Treagust, D.F. (1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom. Science Education, 81, 387–404.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Vygotsky L.S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Vygotsky, L.S., & Luria, A.R. (1930/1993). Studies on the history of behavior: ape, primitive, and child. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
Vygotsky, L. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions, in The collected works of L.S. Vygotysky (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum.
Wertsch, J. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wortham, S. (2003). Curriculum as a resource for the development of social identity. Sociology of Education, 76, 229–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
John Reveles is an assistant professor in the Elementary Education Department at California State University, Northridge. He received his Ph.D. from the University of California, Santa Barbara in 2005. Before pursuing his Ph.D., he worked as a bilingual elementary school teacher for 3 years. His research focuses on the development of scientific literacy in elementary school settings; sociocultural influences on students' academic identity; equity of access issues in science education; qualitative and quantitative research methods. Within the Michael D. Eisner College of Education, he teaches elementary science curriculum methods courses, graduate science education seminars, and graduate research courses.
Gregory Kelly is a professor of science education at Penn State University. He is a former Peace Corps Volunteer and physics teacher. He received his Ph.D. from Cornell in 1994. His research focuses on classroom discourse, epistemology, and science learning. This work has been supported by grants from Spencer Foundation, National Science Foundation, and the National Academy of Education. He teaches courses concerning the uses of history, philosophy, sociology of science in science teaching and teaching and learning science in secondary schools. He is editor of the journal Science Education.
Richard Durán is a Professor in the Gevirtz Graduate School of Education, University of California, Santa Barbara. His research and publications have been in the areas of literacy and assessment of English Language Learners and Latino students. He has also conducted research on after school computer clubs, technology and learning as part of the international UC Links Network. With support from the Kellogg Foundation, he is implementing and investigating community and family-centered intervention programs serving the educational progress of Latino students in the middle and high school grades.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reveles, J.M., Kelly, G.J. & Durán, R.P. A sociocultural perspective on mediated activity in third grade science. Cult.Scie.Edu. 1, 467–495 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9019-8
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-006-9019-8