Abstract
Accessory and anomalous muscles have been described in humans, but only a few at the level of the knee. The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to determine the prevalence of a new accessory muscle located at the level of the knee detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The accessory muscle is designated an accessory plantaris muscle in this study due to its intimate origin with the normal plantaris muscle. Retrospective review of 1,000 consecutive MRI exams of the knee performed on patients presenting with acute or chronic knee symptoms revealed an accessory plantaris muscle in 63 of the 1,000 patients (6.3%)—38 males (7.5%) and 25 females (5.1%). Origin of 62 of 63 of the accessory plantaris muscles merged with the origin of the normal plantaris muscle, and one of 63 merged with the origin of the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle. These accessory plantaris muscles inserted into the iliotibial band, the lateral patellar retinaculum, or the iliotibial tract.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
While many accessory and anomalous muscles have been described in humans, only a few have been reported at the level of the knee [1–3, 6]. The clinical importance of these muscles depends upon their location and their potential affect on the adjacent anatomic structures [4]. In addition, accessory muscles may be confused for a neoplasm if they are palpated during a physical exam [5]. The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to determine the prevalence of a new accessory muscle located at the level of the knee detected with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The new accessory muscle is designated an accessory plantaris muscle due to its intimate origin with the normal plantaris muscle.
Materials and methods
After receiving hospital institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of 1,000 consecutive MRI exams of the knee was performed to determine the prevalence of the accessory plantaris muscle and to assess its origin and insertion. The 1,000 MRI exams included 510 male and 490 female patients and were performed at outpatient imaging centers from May 2006 to February 2007, on patients presenting with acute or chronic knee symptoms. All MRI exams were performed with standard imaging protocols employing spin-echo techniques in three orthogonal imaging planes, along with a short tau inversion recovery or a fat-suppressed T2 sequence in at least one imaging plane. Imaging parameters included section thickness of 4 to 5 mm, a 14-cm field of view, and a 128 × 256 to a 256 × 256 imaging matrix. Imaging protocols were optimized for the different MRI systems which included low-field (0.3 T), mid-field (0.7 T), and high-field (1.0 and 1.5 T) MRI systems. All MRI exams were reviewed by a single musculoskeletal radiologist with 25 years of experience interpreting MRI exams.
The accessory plantaris muscle was best delineated in the axial plane, but it was also detected in the coronal plane in all cases. To be recorded as present, the accessory plantaris muscle had to be detected in both the axial and coronal planes and contained muscle fibers that were similar in appearance to the normal muscles in the knee. If an accessory plantaris muscle was present, its origin and insertion were recorded.
For statistical analysis, the chi-square test was used to compare the incidence of the accessory plantaris in males and females.
Results
An accessory plantaris muscle was detected in 63 of 1,000 patients (6.3%)—38 males (7.5%) and 25 females (5.1%). There was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of the accessory plantaris muscle in males versus females (p = 0.13). The origin of 62 of the accessory plantaris muscles merged with the origin of the normal plantaris muscle, and the origin of one of the accessory plantaris muscles merged with the origin of the lateral head of the gastrocnemius muscle. Forty-three of the accessory plantaris muscles inserted into the iliotibial band, 15 inserted into the lateral patellar retinaculum, and five inserted into the iliotibial tract. The size of the accessory plantaris muscle ranged from a thin muscle with a linear band-like insertion (Fig. 1a–k) to a thick fusiform muscle with a wide insertion (Fig. 2a–h). Almost all the accessory plantaris muscles inserted immediately distal to the termination of the vastus lateralis muscle, and the level of the insertion of the accessory plantaris muscle was located slightly proximal to its origin.
Discussion
The aim of this retrospective cohort analysis was to determine the prevalence of a new accessory muscle, designated an accessory plantaris muscle in this study, in routine MRI exams of the knee. The accessory plantaris muscle was detected in 63 of 1,000 patients (6.3%)—38 males (7.5%) and 25 females (5.1%). To the author’s knowledge, this accessory muscle has not been previously described in the literature. MRI provides exquisite anatomic detail of the musculoskeletal system due to its excellent spatial and contrast resolution of soft tissue structures. Cross-sectional MRI imaging is the optimal noninvasive imaging modality to study normal anatomic structures of the musculoskeletal system and to detect an accessory or anomalous muscle that may be present. The origin and insertion of these muscles are best delineated with MRI since there is no distortion of tissue planes that may occur with cadaveric dissection or at the time of surgery.
There were no limitations in this study as far as the detection of the accessory plantaris muscle or to determine its origin. The muscle was easily detected in the MRI exams which utilized low-field (0.3 T), mid-field (0.5 T), and high-field (1.0 and 1.5 T) MRI systems. Each MRI exam included spin-echo axial, coronal, and sagittal sequences, which provide excellent depiction of muscles and tendons, and employed a field of view that included the entire knee. The insertion of the accessory plantaris muscle was more difficult to determine in the low-field MRI systems due to the reduced spatial resolution.
With the new awareness of the presence of the accessory plantaris muscle, future studies may investigate if the muscle has a causative role in pathologic conditions of the knee, such as patellar tracking disorders or iliotibial band friction syndrome.
References
Banjo AO. Aberrant popliteus muscle: anatomy and clinical consideration. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1996;25:69–73.
Bergman RA, Thompson SA, Afifi AK, Saadeh FA. Compendium of human anatomic variation. Baltimore: Urban & Schwarzendberg; 1988; 22–28.
Chason DP, Schultz SM, Fleckenstein JL. Tensor fascia suralis: depiction on MR images. AJR. 1995;165:1220–1221.
Macedo TA, Johnson CM, Hallett JW, Breen JF. Popliteal artery entrapment syndrome: role of imaging in the diagnosis. AJR. 2003;181:1259–1265.
Montet X, Sandoz A, Mauget D, Martinoli C, Bianchi S. Sonographic and MRI appearance of tensor fasciae suralis muscle, an uncommon cause of popliteal swelling. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31:536–538.
Sinav A, Gumusalan Y, Arifoglu Y, Onderoglu S. Accessory muscular bundles arising from the biceps femoris muscle. Kaibogaku Zasshi. 1995;70:245–247.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The author certifies that he has no commercial associations (e.g., consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
The author certifies that his institution has approved the reporting of these cases and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.
Level of evidence: Level IV Diagnostic Study
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herzog, R.J. Accessory Plantaris Muscle: Anatomy and Prevalence. HSS Jrnl 7, 52–56 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-010-9175-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11420-010-9175-y