Abstract
The problems are associated with microplastic (MP) pollution of global concern. However, little is known about the pollution characteristics and sources of MPs in urban green-belt soils. Therefore, this study investigated MP pollution in 11 sampling sites (22 green belts) in Shihezi City. The results showed that the abundance of MPs (0.02–5.00 mm) ranged from 287 ± 100 items/kg dw to 3227 ± 155 items/kg dw (mean + SD). Fibers (69.9%) accounted for the majority of MPs, and the MPs were mainly black (36.7%) and 0.02–0.5 mm (64.8%). The main types of MPs were polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene (PE). Compared with agricultural soil, the color and composition of green-belt soil MPs are diverse, which means that the source of green-belt soil MPs is more diverse. In different types of green-belt soil, MP pollution of industrial green land is more serious. Through cluster analysis and spatial distribution, fragments and fibers were found to have similar sources, mainly originating from food and textile industrial activities. This study provides important information for revealing MP pollutions in urban green-belt soils.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Plastics are widely produced and used in various industries. In 2018, the global production of plastics was approximately 360 million tons, of which China accounted for 30%. Of this plastic, only 25% was recycled (PlasticsEurope 2019). Because of their unique physical and chemical properties, such as ultraviolet resistance, high-temperature resistance, and corrosion resistance, plastics have a long degradation time in the environment. As a result, it leads to the accumulation in the environment of those microplastics that have been broken down through physical, chemical, and biological activities (Wright et al. 2020). Plastic particles with a particle size of < 5 mm are known as microplastics (MPs) (Arthur et al. 2009).
MPs have been widely reported in the agricultural soil environment; however, little is known about MP pollution in urban green-belt soils. When MPs enter the soil environment, they can change the soil properties, thereby affecting plants and animals and harming the ecosystem. For example, studies have shown that MPs can change the bulk density, water holding capacity, and water-stable aggregates (de Souza Machado et al. 2018) and cause degradation of organic matter in soil (Liu et al. 2017), which means that MPs in the soil can affect plant growth. In addition, MPs can absorb organic pollutants (Laganà et al. 2019) and heavy metals (Brennecke et al. 2016) owing to the large specific surface area of MPs. MPs can be mistakenly regarded as food and eaten by organisms, which leads to contamination of organisms by MPs and their adsorbed contaminants. Studies have shown that ingestion of MPs can lead to false satiation, thereby causing biological harm such as clogging or abrasion of the digestive tract and reduced feeding rates (Guo et al. 2020). Luo et al. (2019) reported that exposure of female rats to polystyrene MPs increased the risk of metabolic disorders in their offspring. MPs have been found in many small soil invertebrates, such as snails (Panebianco et al. 2019) and nematodes (Kim and An 2019). Some MPs that accumulate in organisms are transferred to the food chain (Nelms et al. 2018; Sarker et al. 2020). For example, studies have reported the transfer of microscopic and macroscopic plastics between soil and chicken in a family garden in southeastern Mexico (Lwanga et al. 2017) and the intake of plastics by sheep from agricultural soil in Spain (Beriot et al. 2021). The study of soil MPs has attracted the attention of researchers because the exact extent of MP contamination and its possible practical effects on soil ecosystems are not yet fully understood.
The main object of the current research on soil MPs is farmland. For example, researchers have detected MPs in agricultural soil in Shanghai suburbs, revealing the pollution characteristics of MPs in typical agricultural soil (Liu et al. 2018). The analysis of pollution and potential sources of MPs in other soil types is insufficient. Because of the different uses of soils, the main ways in which MPs enter the soil are different. Urban soil, described as “anthropic soil,” are a mixture of natural soil-forming factors and anthropogenic activities, which is fundamentally different from natural soil (Tresch et al. 2018). Urban green space, as a substitute for natural soil, provides a large number of ecosystem services, rainwater interception, and purification, provides habitat for countless microorganisms, plants, and animals, and provides entertainment places for urban residents (Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 2021; Francini et al. 2018). According to the United Nations, 68% of the world’s population will live in cities by 2050 (Delgado-Baquerizo et al.). However, relevant studies show that urban green space is not only the repository of pollutants, but also the second source of pollutants (Li et al. 2018). In view of the importance of urban green-belt soils and the harm of MPs, researchers need to consider the pollution characteristics and potential sources of MPs in urban green-belt soils.
Shihezi City, which won the United Nations Dubai Award for “the best example of improving the living environment” in 2000, is a garden city built on the Gobi wasteland, with a green coverage rate of 42%. Therefore, Shihezi City is an ideal city for investigating MP pollution of urban green-belt soil in remote areas. We investigated the pollution characteristics and spatial distribution of soil MPs in the green space of Shihezi City. The aims of this study were as follows: (1) to investigate the pollution characteristics of MPs in the green-belt soil of Shihezi City; (2) to study the differences in the distribution of MPs in soils taken from different types of green-belts; and (3) to analyze the sources of MPs using cluster analysis, spatial analysis, and related information.
Materials and methods
Sampling sites and sampling
Taking Shihezi City as the research area, 11 sampling points (Fig. 1) were selected and divided into six categories, namely, park green space (A1 and A2), residential green space (B1 and B2), industrial green space (C1 and C2), commercial green space (D1 and D2), road green space (E1 and E2), and green buffer (F1) (Table S1).
Soil sampling was conducted in October 2020. Each sampling point was divided into three sampling surfaces at a distance of three meters, and three subsamples were collected and mixed thoroughly. Before collecting duplicate soil samples, the branches and leaves were removed from the soil surface of the selected sampling area (an area of 20 × 20 cm and depth of 0–5 cm), and the soil was collected with a stainless-steel shovel. Approximately 1 kg of soil sample at each sampling point was stored in aluminum boxes and transported to the laboratory.
Sample preparation
MP extraction
The extraction method was modified from Liu et al. (2019). A portion of the stored sample was weighed and dried in an oven at 50 °C for 24 h to a constant weight. When the soil weight remained constant, 100 g of soil samples was weighed into a clean and dry glass bottle, 200 mL of saturated sodium bromide was added, and the solution was stirred for 5 min and set overnight. The supernatant was then poured into a conical bottle and density separation was repeated three times for the lower layer for each sample. Finally, the supernatant was filtered with a Whatman filter (GF/F, 0.45μm). The surface material of the filter membrane was gently scraped repeatedly with a clean small steel sheet, and then the material was rinsed into a conical flask with 30 mL of 30% hydrogen peroxide (used filter membranes were examined under a microscope for MPs), which was then placed in a shaker (120 rpm, 50 °C) for digestion for 72 h. After digestion, the digestive fluid was turbid, which might have been due to the soil attached to the particles falling off; therefore, density separation was required. The digested liquid was filtered through a filter membrane and washed with saturated sodium bromide, added into a centrifuge tube, and centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 10 min (Carr et al. 2016). Centrifugation was repeated three times for each sample. Finally, the supernatant was filtered, and the MP particles on the surface of the filter membrane were washed with anhydrous ethanol and placed in a clean glass petri dish. The petri dish was then dried at room temperature.
Observation and identification of MPs
The concentration, size, and type of all observed substances were determined, and the substances were observed using a stereomicroscope (SZX16, Olympus) equipped with a camera. Suspected MPs were first distinguished under the microscope according to the classification criteria developed in a previous study (Mohamed Nor and Obbard 2014) and thermal needles. Four characteristics were recorded, namely, abundance, size (0.02–5 mm), color, and shape. Seventy suspected MPs (particles so fine that they could not be tested with a heating needle) were then removed with tweezers for further confirmation by micro-Fourier transform infrared (μ-FTIR) spectroscopy (Bruker Vertex 70v, Germany) under the transmittance mode. Each spectrum was obtained in a wavenumber range of 4000–400 cm−1 and scanned 32 times with a resolution of 4 cm−1. The KnowItAll 2020 software was used to compare the obtained spectra with the built-in polymer library, and only results with matching degrees > 70% were accepted. Among the 70 selected suspecteds particles, 56 were identified as plastics (80%). According to the test results, non-MPs were removed from the statistical analysis.
Quality assurance and quality control
All utensils were rinsed with distilled water three times and were covered with an aluminum film when not in use. All the solutions were filtered before use. In order to reduce errors, all used filter membranes were scanned for MPs under the stereomicroscope. Three parallel experiments were conducted for each sampling site. Gloves and cotton laboratory coats were used for all experimental steps. During the experiment, two groups of blank samples were set: the first group was operated without soil to evaluate whether there was pollution during the operation process; the second group had a filter device placed around the microscope to filter the surrounding air for 2 h to evaluate the presence of air pollution in the environment. As observed through the microscope, 0.83 ± 0.75 fibers were found in both groups. Therefore, contamination during the analysis process was negligible.
Data analysis
SPSS version 25 was used for all statistical analyses and Origin version 2021 and ArcMap version 10.2 were used for mapping. The Kruskal–Wallis H-test was used to compare the differences in abundance between different sampling sites and between different functional areas. All sampling sites and shapes of MP were classified by systematic clustering to determine which study areas had similar pollution characteristics and similar sources of pollution by the method of the cluster analysis. To infer the source of MPs based on the shape distribution of MPs, a four-variable PCA was used. The inverse distance weight interpolation method was used in ArcGIS to study the spatial distribution of MPs in Shihezi City. Statistical significance was accepted when p < 0.05, and the values were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation.
Results and discussion
Abundance and distribution characteristics of MPs
In this study, MPs were found in the urban green-belt soil at each sampling point. The abundance of MPs at each sampling point is shown in Fig. 2a. There was a significant difference in the abundance between the different sampling sites (p < 0.05) (Table S2). The concentration of MPs ranged from 287 ± 100 items/kg dw to 3227 ± 155 items/kg dw, with an average of 1303 ± 926 items/kg dw; this shows lower abundance of MPs in the urban green-belt soil at each sampling point than that detected in agricultural soils. For example, an average abundance of 2116 ± 1024 items/kg MPs was detected on a farm in southeastern Spain (Beriot et al. 2021). It is worth noting that in the Spanish study, distilled water was used as the density solution and the MPs were observed based on the overall image changes before and after heating without size information, while the present study used a high-density separation solution (ρ = 1.55) and was carefully observed under a microscope, so the present study is much lower than the Spanish study on MP contamination in agricultural fields. The average content of MPs in the vegetable soil in southwest China was 18,760 items/kg (Zhang and Liu 2018), which better proves the high MP contamination in farmland areas. In their study, ZnCl2 (ρ = 1.5) was used as separation solution, similar to the present study, and the size range of statistical MPs was consistent. There was a significant difference in the content of MPs between C2 and E1 (Table S3). Among the 11 sampling sites, the highest abundance of MPs was detected in C2 (3227 ± 155 items/kg dw), with fiber-shaped MPs up to 2400 ± 176 items/kg dw. This might have occurred because there are textile mills around C2, which pollutes the surrounding green-belt soil with MPs. A previous study of water and sediment samples from a textile industrial zone in Shaoxing City, China, showed that the textile industry has a high degree of MP pollution to local fresh water and sediments (Deng et al. 2020), which further verifies our results. Therefore, the surrounding soil may also be contaminated by MPs. This finding is similar to the highest concentration found in typical farmland soils in Shaanxi Province (3410 items/kg) (Ding et al. 2020). This shows that MPs in soil have other sources besides agricultural activities, which are dependent on the surrounding environment. The lowest concentrations were 287 ± 100 items/kg dw and 593 ± 68 items/kg dw at E1 and A1, respectively. E1 is in an area with high traffic flow, but the MP content was the lowest. This might have been due to tillage activities prior to E1 sampling; however, tillage activities mainly result in the migration of surface-enriched soil MPs to deeper soils by overturning the topsoil and deeper soils (Rillig et al. 2017). The MPs content of A1 might have been low because it is in the forest of West Park, which has lush trees and is less affected by human activities and atmospheric deposition; therefore, it is less polluted by MPs. This result is similar to that detected in soil samples from the Swiss Nature Reserve (593 items/kg) (Scheurer and Bigalke 2018).
Characteristics of MPs in urban green-belt soil
In this study, the shapes of MPs were divided into fibers, fragments, films, and pellets, and the images obtained using the stereomicroscope are shown in Fig. 3. As shown in Fig. 2b and Fig. S1a, fibers are common MPs, accounting for 67.9% of MPs, followed by fragments and films, accounting for 19.3% and 10.0% of MPs, respectively. The smallest proportion was of pellets, accounting for only 2.8% of MPs. This result is similar to that of a study of cultivated soil in Southwest China (Zhang and Liu 2018). It has also been reported that MPs are mainly fiber-shaped in farmland in the suburbs of Shanghai, China (Liu et al. 2018). Owing to the characteristics of climate drought in Shihezi City, the use of a dust-proof net in the early stage of green-belt soil development led to fiber pollution (Chen et al. 2021). In addition, the erosion of synthetic textiles and synthetic rubber (Prata 2018) and atmospheric deposition are other important sources (Dris et al. 2016). In 2014, the global synthetic fiber output reached 65.2 million metric tons with the highest proportion being from Asia (52.5 million metric tons) (Chemical et al. 2015). When exposed to sunlight, these fiber products undergo photooxidation and exert thermal effects to decompose and degrade into microfibers, thereby resulting in high fiber contamination in the environment (Song et al. 2017). Fragmented MPs usually originate from the breakdown of plastic containers, cutlery, furniture, and toys (Peng et al. 2018; Zhao et al. 2015). Most MP films originate from the decomposition of large plastic bags (Mohamed Nor and Obbard 2014). During sampling, some aged plastic bags were found in the soil, which supported this finding. To further analyze the distribution of soil MP morphology, four variable principal component analyses were performed (Fig. S2). Ninety-two percent of the total data variance was explained by factors 1 and 2, explaining 65.6% and 24.6% of the total variance, respectively. Factor 1 was mainly determined by the load of fragments, fibers, and films (0.60, 0.56, and 0.56, respectively). Factor 2 represented particles (0.99). Except for the samples from C1 and E2, the characteristics of all samples were significantly different. These results reflect the heterogeneity of soil MP distribution in the green-belt soil of Shihezi City.
The proportions of different coloreds MPs at each sampling point and the proportions of total color are shown in Fig. 2c and Fig. S1b. Black was the main color, accounting for 37.1%, followed by red and green, accounting for 18.0% and 17.8%, respectively. A study by Wang et al. (2021) on MP color distributions in soils of different land-use types found that yellow was the main MP color (32.05%), and only four colors were found in total. They studied the soil of the largest greenhouse vegetable production base in northern China and found that transparent/translucent (27.1%) was the main MP color, followed by white (24.2%), and multiple colors were observed (Yu et al. 2021). The color diversity of MPs indicates the diversity of MP sources. As shown in Fig. S1b, 46.5% of MPs had bright colors. This result is similar to that detected in agricultural farmland in Southeast Germany (40%) (Piehl et al. 2018). Colorants have been widely added to the production of consumer plastics to increase the attractiveness of plastic products (Thetford et al. 2003; Xu et al. 2020). However, colored plastics are created by adding colorants (Muller 2011) which can be released into the environment during decomposition (Gewert et al. 2015). Therefore, the high percentage of brightly colored MPs found in this study is of even greater concern to researchers.
According to Ding et al. (2020), the size of MPs is divided into four ranges, namely, 0.02-0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–2.0, and 2.0–5.0 mm. The distribution is shown in Fig. 2d and Fig. S1c. The content of MPs decreased as the MP size increased, which is consistent with the results of other studies (Imhof et al. 2016; Yu et al. 2021). In addition, most MPs in other environmental media are < 0.5 mm in size, such as the atmosphere (Szewc et al. 2021), water (Bertoldi et al. 2021), and water sediment (Peng et al. 2017). The sources of small MPs can be divided into two categories, the first produced from large-sized plastics via photodegradation, wind corrosion, and physical wear (Gewert et al. 2015) and the second being man-made tiny plastic particles released directly into the environment, such as the former production of face wash, toothpaste, and shampoo containing microbeads (Cole et al. 2011). Owing to the typical climate characteristics of Xinjiang (long light period, windy, and dry year-round), the decomposition of large-sized MPs into small-sized MPs is accelerated.
Among the 70 randomly selected particles, 56 were identified as MPs, which were mainly composed of 12 polymers (80%), namely, polystyrene (PS), polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane (PU), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polyfluoroethylene (PVF), amino plastics (AF), polyamide (PA), polyacrylonitrile (PAN), and phenol-formaldehyde resin (PF). The infrared spectra of major MPs are shown in Fig. 4a. More types of polymers were detected than those detected in several other environmental media, such as a researcher identified three (PP, PE, and PS) and five (PP, PE, PS, PVC, and PET) types of MPs by attenuated total reflection Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy in surface water and sediment, respectively, in the lower Xijiang River in southern China (Huang et al. 2021). In addition, more types of polymers were detected than those in agricultural soils; for example, in a study of MPs in Shanghai farmland by (Liu et al. 2018), three types of MPs (PP, PE, and polyester) were identified by μ-FTIR. Similarly, a researcher studied the contamination of microplastics in six different types of agricultural soils and identified a total of seven types of microplastics by μ-FTIR, namely PVC, PA, PE, PP, PS, polyester, and acrylic (Wang et al. 2021). The results of our study differ from those of previous studies, thereby indicating that the sources of MPs in urban green-belt soil are more complex than those in other environmental media. Among the 12 types of polymers, PS (28.6%) and PE (21.4%) were the most abundant (Fig. 4b). PE is commonly used in environmental protection bags, pallets, plastic containers, agricultural films, food packaging films, toys, and bottles, whereas PS is commonly used in the dairy industry, fishery food packaging, building insulation materials, and other industries (PlasticsEurope 2019). PE and PS are two of the four most versatile thermoplastic resins (Wang et al. 2020), which may be one of the main reasons for their serious pollution. It is urgent to regulate the use of plastics and the recycling and treatment of plastic waste, considering the wide use and serious pollution of the two dominant polymers.
Distribution characteristics of MPs in different green-belt soils
Because there are many types of urban greenbelts, this study divided the sampling points into park green space, residential green space, industrial green space, commercial green space, road green space, and green buffer to study the influence of different green belt types on the distribution of MPs. According to Fig. 5, the abundance of MP was the highest on the industrial green space (2118 ± 1220 items/kg), followed by commercial green space (1574 ± 1362 items/kg), green buffer (1446 ± 55 items/kg), residential green space (1036 ± 470 items/kg), park green space (935 ± 425 items/kg), and the lowest in the road green space (780 ± 602 items/kg). However, there were no significant differences in the distribution of MPs in the different types of green-belt spaces (Table S4). In addition, the abundance of MPs of < 5 mm in size in the green buffer soil was higher than that of other types in green-belt soil, whereas the abundance of MPs of 2–5 mm in size in the of green buffer soil was lower than that of other types in green-belt soil. Because there are no tall buildings at the edge of the city, it is possible that the green buffer is susceptible to pollution from strong winds carrying dust and sand. Moreover, strong light radiation can accelerate the decomposition of MPs. Therefore, natural factors are the main factors affecting the distribution characteristics of MPs in greenbelt soil, whereas human factors mainly affect abundance.
Sources of MPs
According to relevant studies, there is a link between the shape of microplastics and potential sources (Maghsodian et al. 2021). In this study, fibers were observed as the predominant shape, which may be closely related to synthetic fiber production and use, while infrared analysis indicated the presence of PET and PA microplastics, and the breakage or abrasion of these textiles may be the source of PET and PA microplastics (Geyer et al. 2017). In addition, another important source of fibers in urban green belts was found in this study, namely the use of dust screens. Fragments are also more common, and microplastic fragments have some association with plastic packaging and plastic waste (Yang et al. 2021), suggesting that the decomposition of bulk plastic and litter may be a key source of microplastics in the urban greenbelt of Shihezi City.
In this study, clustering analysis and spatial distribution of MP shapes were used to further understand the sources of MPs. Based on cluster analysis results (Fig. 6a), it was observed that the shapes of MPs were divided into three main categories. The three main types are fragments and fibers, pellets, and films. The fibers and fragments were grouped together, which means that fiber and fragment–shaped MPs have similar origins. The spatial distribution of fiber and fragment MPs in Shihezi City (Fig. 6b and c) further indicates that the pollution characteristics of fiber and fragment MPs are similar, and the pollution is more serious in the east of Shihezi City, which is mainly concentrated in sampling site C2; thus, industrial activities are one of the main sources of fiber and fragment MPs. It can be seen from Fig. 6d that in addition to the serious pollution in the industrial area, the MPs in the shape of films also have more serious pollution around F1, which is due to the fact that the area around F1 is all agricultural and plastic films which are widely used to cover farmland in arid areas of Northwest China (Li et al. 2020). However, plastic film is usually not recycled and is left in the field, thereby resulting in film MP contamination (Huang et al. 2020). Therefore, in addition to industrial activities, the surrounding agricultural activities are also one of the main sources of film MPs. The pellet MPs at each sampling point had low pollution; therefore, no spatial analysis was conducted.
Many sources of MPs in agricultural soil have been reported; however, source analysis of urban green-belt soil MPs is relatively limited. In this study, infrared spectroscopy showed that PS, which is widely used in the light industry market, such as food packaging (daily and fishery), building insulation, electrical and electronic equipment, inner liner for fridges, and eyeglasses frames (PlasticsEurope 2019), was the main component of MPs. Therefore, PS products are one of the main sources of urban MPs, and it is necessary to strengthen the research and development substitute products, to protect the urban environment. At the same time, the government needs to take measures to improve and strengthen the infrastructure for plastic collection.
This study can only analyze the source of MPs through the shape of MPs. It is speculated that the pollution of MPs of various shapes in this area is mainly from a neighborhood, but the specific potential source of MPs cannot be studied for its contribution to the urban greenbelt. For example, many studies have shown that there are MP pollution in atmospheric deposition (Dris et al. 2015), surface runoff caused by rainy season (Dris et al. 2015), snow melting in winter (Bergmann et al. 2019), irrigation water, and fertilization of urban green space (Blasing and Amelung 2018) (Zhang et al. 2020). These sources are one of the sources of soil MP in urban greenbelt (Fig. 7). How to study its contribution to soil pollution will be considered in the future.
Conclusions
In this study, the characteristics and spatial distribution of MPs in the urban green-belt soil of Shihezi City were investigated. The green-belt soil in Shihezi was polluted by MPs, and the average abundance of MPs was lower than that in most agricultural soils. However, the highest abundance of MPs was close to that detected by other scholars in agricultural soils, which means that there are other important sources of MPs besides agricultural activities. Low abundance of MPs was found in the soils after loosening, thereby indicating that tillage activities contribute to the migration of MPs, which requires further study. The MPs were mainly fiber-shaped, black, and small. The main MPs materials were PS and PE. Compared with those in agricultural soil, the color and composition of green-belt soil MPs were diverse, which means that the source of green-belt soil MPs is more diverse. In different types of green-belt soil, MP pollution of industrial green land and commercial green land was more serious. Using cluster analysis and spatial distribution, fragments and fibers were found to have similar sources and mainly originated from food and textile industrial activities. In addition, the potential sources of MPs in green-belt soil should be detected and analyzed in the future to better control the source of pollution. Future research should focus on the detection of MPs in different types of soil and different industries to better understand the source and migration of MPs. This study is significant for soil MP pollution detection and can provide a basis for future MP control and the establishment of environmental standards.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Arthur C, Baker J, Bamford H (2009) Proceedings of the international research workshop on the occurrence, effects and fate of microplastic marine debris. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Technical Memorandum NOS-OR&R-30
Bergmann M, Mützel S, Primpke S, Tekman MB, Trachsel J, Gerdts G (2019) White and wonderful? Microplastics prevail in snow from the Alps to the Arctic. Sci Adv 5(8):eaax1157
Beriot N, Peek J, Zornoza R, Geissen V, Huerta Lwanga E (2021) Low density-microplastics detected in sheep faeces and soil: a case study from the intensive vegetable farming in Southeast Spain. Sci Total Environ 755(1):142653
Bertoldi C, Lara LZ, Mizushima FAL, Martins FCG, Battisti MA, Hinrichs R, Fernandes AN (2021) First evidence of microplastic contamination in the freshwater of Lake Guaíba, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 759:143503
Blasing M, Amelung W (2018) Plastics in soil: analytical methods and possible sources. Sci Total Environ 612:422
Brennecke D, Duarte B, Paiva F, Caçador I, Canning-Clode J (2016) Microplastics as vector for heavy metal contamination from the marine environment. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 178:189–195
Carr SA, Liu J, Tesoro AG (2016) Transport and fate of microplastic particles in wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 91(Mar.15):174–182
Chemical, Fibers, International, group (2015) Global synthetic fiber production. Chemical fibers international: fibers polymers, fibers, texturing, and spunbonds 65(4):210-210
Chen Y, Wu Y, Ma J, An Y, Liu Q, Yang S, Qu Y, Chen H, Zhao W, Tian Y (2021) Microplastics pollution in the soil mulched by dust-proof nets: a case study in Beijing, China. Environ Pollut 275:116600
Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS (2011) Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Mar Pollut Bull 62(12):2588–2597
de Souza Machado AA, Lau CW, Till J, Kloas W, Lehmann A, Becker R, Rillig MC (2018) Impacts of microplastics on the soil biophysical environment. Environ Sci Technol 52(17):9656–9665
Delgado-Baquerizo M, Eldridge David J, Liu Y-R, Sokoya B, Wang J-T, Hu H-W, He J-Z, Bastida F, Moreno José L, Bamigboye Adebola R, Blanco-Pastor José L, Cano-Díaz C, Illán Javier G, Makhalanyane Thulani P, Siebe C, Trivedi P, Zaady E, Verma Jay P, Wang L et al (2021) Global homogenization of the structure and function in the soil microbiome of urban greenspaces. Sci Adv 7(28):eabg5809
Deng H, Wei R, Luo W, Hu L, Li B, Di Y, Shi H, Blarer P, Burkhardt-Holm P, Andrady AL (2020) Microplastic pollution in water and sediment in a textile industrial area. Environ Pollut 258(8):113658–111605
Ding L, Zhang S, Wang X, Yang X, Zhang C, Qi Y, Guo X (2020) The occurrence and distribution characteristics of microplastics in the agricultural soils of Shaanxi Province, in north-western China. Sci Total Environ 720:137525
Dris R, Gasperi J, Rocher V, Saad M, Renault N, Tassin B (2015) Microplastic contamination in an urban area: a case study in Greater Paris. Environ Chem 12(5):592
Dris R, Gasperi J, Saad M, Mirande C, Tassin B (2016) Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: a source of microplastics in the environment? Mar Pollut Bull 104(1):290–293
Francini G, Hui N, Jumpponen A, Kotze DJ, Romantschuk M, Allen JA, Setälä H (2018) Soil biota in boreal urban greenspace: responses to plant type and age. Soil Biol Biochem 118:145–155
Gewert B, Plassmann MM, MacLeod M (2015) Pathways for degradation of plastic polymers floating in the marine environment. Environ Sci Process Impacts 17(9):1513–1521
Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv 3(7):e1700782
Guo J-J, Huang X-P, Xiang L, Wang Y-Z, Li Y-W, Li H, Cai Q-Y, Mo C-H, Wong M-H (2020) Source, migration and toxicology of microplastics in soil. Environ Int 137:105263
Huang Y, Liu Q, Jia W, Yan C, Wang J (2020) Agricultural plastic mulching as a source of microplastics in the terrestrial environment. Environ Pollut 260:114096
Huang D, Li X, Ouyang Z, Zhao X, Wu R, Zhang C, Lin C, Li Y, Guo X (2021) The occurrence and abundance of microplastics in surface water and sediment of the West River downstream, in the south of China. Sci Total Environ 756:143857
Imhof HK, Laforsch C, Wiesheu AC, Schmid J, Anger PM, Niessner R, Ivleva NP (2016) Pigments and plastic in limnetic ecosystems: a qualitative and quantitative study on microparticles of different size classes. Water Res 98:64–74
Kim SW, An Y-J (2019) Soil microplastics inhibit the movement of springtail species. Environ Int 126:699–706
Laganà P, Caruso G, Corsi I, Bergami E, Venuti V, Majolino D, La Ferla R, Azzaro M, Cappello S (2019) Do plastics serve as a possible vector for the spread of antibiotic resistance? First insights from bacteria associated to a polystyrene piece from King George Island (Antarctica). Int J Hyg Environ Health 222(1):89–100
Li G, Sun GX, Ren Y, Luo XS, Zhu YG (2018) Urban soil and human health: a review. Eur J Soil Sci 69(1):196–215
Li W, Wufuer R, Duo J, Wang S, Luo Y, Zhang D, Pan X (2020) Microplastics in agricultural soils: extraction and characterization after different periods of polythene film mulching in an arid region. Sci Total Environ 749:141420
Liu H, Yang X, Liu G, Liang C, Xue S, Chen H, Ritsema CJ, Geissen V (2017) Response of soil dissolved organic matter to microplastic addition in Chinese loess soil. Chemosphere 185:907–917
Liu M, Lu S, Song Y, Lei L, Hu J, Lv W, Zhou W, Cao C, Shi H, Yang X, He D (2018) Microplastic and mesoplastic pollution in farmland soils in suburbs of Shanghai, China. Environ Pollut 242:855–862
Liu M, Song Y, Lu S, Qiu R, Hu J, Li X, Bigalke M, Shi H, He D (2019) A method for extracting soil microplastics through circulation of sodium bromide solutions. Sci Total Environ 691:341–347
Luo T, Zhang Y, Wang C, Wang X, Zhou J, Shen M, Zhao Y, Fu Z, Jin Y (2019) Maternal exposure to different sizes of polystyrene microplastics during gestation causes metabolic disorders in their offspring. Environ Pollut (Barking, Essex : 1987) 255(Pt 1):113122
Lwanga EH, Vega JM, Quej VK, Chi J, Lucero S, Chi C, Segura GE, Gertsen H, Salánki T, Martine V (2017) Field evidence for transfer of plastic debris along a terrestrial food chain. Sci Rep 7(1):14071
Maghsodian Z, Sanati AM, Ramavandi B, Ghasemi A, Sorial GA (2021) Microplastics accumulation in sediments and Periophthalmus waltoni fish, mangrove forests in southern Iran. Chemosphere 264:128543
Mohamed Nor NH, Obbard JP (2014) Microplastics in Singapore’s coastal mangrove ecosystems. Mar Pollut Bull 79(1-2):278–283
Muller B (2011) Colorants for Thermoplastic Polymers. In: Kutz M (ed) Applied plastics engineering handbook. William Andrew Publishing, Oxford, pp 435–440
Nelms SE, Galloway TS, Godley BJ, Jarvis DS, Lindeque PK (2018) Investigating microplastic trophic transfer in marine top predators. Environ Pollut 238:999–1007
Panebianco A, Nalbone L, Giarratana F, Ziino G (2019) First discoveries of microplastics in terrestrial snails. Food Control 106:106722–106722
Peng G, Zhu B, Yang D, Su L, Shi H, Li D (2017) Microplastics in sediments of the Changjiang Estuary, China. Environ Pollut 225:283–290
Peng G, Xu P, Zhu B, Bai M, Li D (2018) Microplastics in freshwater river sediments in Shanghai, China: a case study of risk assessment in mega-cities. Environ Pollut 234:448–456
Piehl S, Leibner A, Löder MGJ, Dris R, Bogner C, Laforsch C (2018) Identification and quantification of macro- and microplastics on an agricultural farmland. Sci Rep 8(1):17950
PlasticsEurope (2019) Plastics–the facts 2019: an analysis of European plastictics production, demand and waste data, http://www.plasticseurope.org/
Prata JC (2018) Airborne microplastics: consequences to human health? Environ Pollut 234(3):115–126
Rillig MC, Ingraffia, Machado AAD (2017) Microplastic incorporation into soil in agroecosystems. Front Plant Sci 8
Sarker A, Deepo DM, Nandi R, Rana J, Islam S, Rahman S, Hossain MN, Islam MS, Baroi A, Kim J-E (2020) A review of microplastics pollution in the soil and terrestrial ecosystems: a global and Bangladesh perspective. Sci Total Environ 733:139296
Scheurer M, Bigalke M (2018) Microplastics in Swiss floodplain soils. Environ Sci Technol 52(6):3591–3598
Song YK, Hong SH, Jang M, Han GM, Jung SW, Shim WJ (2017) Combined effects of UV exposure duration and mechanical abrasion on microplastic fragmentation by polymer type. Environ Sci Technol 51(8):4368–4376
Szewc K, Graca B, Dołęga A (2021) Atmospheric deposition of microplastics in the coastal zone: characteristics and relationship with meteorological factors. Sci Total Environ 761:143272
Thetford D, Chorlton AP, Hardman J (2003) Synthesis and properties of some polycyclic barbiturate pigments. Dyes Pigments 59(2):185–191
Tresch S, Moretti M, Le Bayon R-C, Mäder P, Zanetta A, Frey D, Stehle B, Kuhn A, Munyangabe A, Fliessbach A (2018) Urban soil quality assessment—a comprehensive case study dataset of urban garden soils. Front Environ Sci 6:2296
Wang G, Lu J, Li W, Ning J, Xiayihazi N (2020) Seasonal variation and risk assessment of microplastics in surface water of the Manas River Basin, China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 208:111477
Wang J, Li J, Liu S, Li H, Chen X, Peng C, Zhang P, Liu X (2021) Distinct microplastic distributions in soils of different land-use types: a case study of Chinese farmlands. Environ Pollut 269:116199
Wright SL, Ulke J, Font A, Chan KLA, Kelly FJ (2020) Atmospheric microplastic deposition in an urban environment and an evaluation of transport. Environ Int 136(3):105411
Xu C, Zhang B, Gu C, Shen C, Yin S, Aamir M, Li F (2020) Are we underestimating the sources of microplastic pollution in terrestrial environment? J Hazard Mater 400:123228
Yang L, Zhang Y, Kang S, Wang Z, Wu C (2021) Microplastics in soil: a review on methods, occurrence, sources, and potential risk. Sci Total Environ 780:146546
Yu L, Zhang J, Liu Y, Chen L, Tao S, Liu W (2021) Distribution characteristics of microplastics in agricultural soils from the largest vegetable production base in China. Sci Total Environ 756:143860
Zhang GS, Liu YF (2018) The distribution of microplastics in soil aggregate fractions in southwestern China. Sci Total Environ 642(nov.15):12–20
Zhang L, Xie Y, Liu J, Zhong S, Qian Y, Gao P (2020) An overlooked entry pathway of microplastics into agricultural soils from application of sludge-based fertilizers. Environ Sci Technol 54(7):4248–4255
Zhao S, Zhu L, Li D (2015) Microplastic in three urban estuaries, China. Environ Pollut 206:597–604
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, for the financial support to carry out this project. The authors acknowledge the always helpful laboratory assistance from Gaoliang Wang, and Yan Qin. We extend our sincere thanks to the anonymous reviewers and dedicated editors for their invaluable opinions and great contributions to the successful publication of this manuscript.
Funding
This work was financed by the “Strong youth” key talents of scientific and technological innovation of the Xinjiang Construction Crops (No. 2021CB040).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Xiaodong Liu: validation, conceptualization, investigation, visualization, writing — original draft, writing — review & editing. Shaohua He: validation, conceptualization, investigation, visualization, writing — original draft, writing — review & editing. Yanbin Tong: validation, supervision. Zilong Liu: validation, supervision. Weijun Li: validation, investigation. Nuerguli Xiayihazi: validation, investigation. Jianjiang Lu: validation, resources, conceptualization, supervision, writing — review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Thomas D. Bucheli
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(DOCX 349 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, X., He, S., Tong, Y. et al. Microplastic pollution in urban green-belt soil in Shihezi City, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 59403–59413 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20083-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20083-7