Introduction

The selective catalytic reduction of ammonia (NH3-SCR) is the most efficient technology for removing NOx from diesel engines (Busca et al. 1998). Although conventional three-way catalyst of V2O5/WOx–TiOx (Song et al. 2016) has been used for decades to control NOx emissions from diesel engine exhaust, it has some inevitable drawbacks that restricted their application, such as the narrow temperature operation window (300–400 °C), low thermal stability resulting from the phase transformation of TiO2, and the toxicity of vanadium species (Heck 1999; Shi et al. 2011). Metal-exchanged microporous zeolites have received much attention recently due to their high catalytic activity, wide temperature window, and outstanding structural durability (Beale et al. 2015; Dusselier and Davis 2018; Zhang et al. 2016).

Since Cu/ZSM-5 has been regarded as one of the most effective zeolite catalysts for the decomposition of nitrogen oxides (Iwamoto et al. 1986), researchers have carried out a lot of work to improve the performance in the NH3-SCR, such as active reaction temperature, copper species, active sites, intermediates, and catalyst promoters in the NH3-SCR reaction. Due to CeO2 having high oxygen storage capacity, excellent redox properties, and strong interactions with other metals, it is introduced to Cu/ZSM-5 to enhance the catalytic activity and hydrothermal stability (Pang et al. 2014; Wang et al. 2017). Moreover, the micropore structure of zeolite leads to the diffusion limitations, poor dispersion, and inaccessibility of the catalytically active centers (Chal et al. 2011; Holm et al. 2011; Ma et al. 2013; Serrano et al. 2013). The generation of mesopores can modify the structure of the zeolite and enhance catalytic efficiency. Compared with conventional microporous zeolites, the mesoporous zeolites exhibit higher activity at low temperatures and stability in the long term (Góra-Marek et al. 2015; Rutkowska et al. 2015; Yue et al. 2015c).

The synthesis routes used to prepare mesoporous zeolites include template methods (Liu et al. 2016; Xie et al. 2016; Yan et al. 2016; Yue et al. 2015a) and post-treatments (Ma et al. 2013; Rutkowska et al. 2017; Vennestrøm et al. 2011) for NH3-SCR technology. However, the template methods suffer from template removal problem and impurity introduction. The post-treatments usually change the acidity and crystalline framework of zeolites and result in material loss.

To reduce the diffusional distance and enhance the loading of metal ions, another direct way is to decrease the crystal size of zeolites so as to increase the surface area. Wakihara et al. (Peng et al. 2018) reported that nanosized SSZ-13 zeolite with strong hydrothermal stability was prepared by a two-stage synthetic method, which displayed the same catalytic performance in the NH3-SCR reaction as the micro-scale counterparts. Tsunoji et al. (Takata et al. 2016) synthesized nanosized CHA zeolites with high thermal and hydrothermal stability by the hydrothermal transformation of FAU zeolites in the presence of N, N, N-trimethyl-1-adamantammonium hydroxide (TMAdaOH), and the obtained Cu-loaded nanosized CHA zeolite catalyst showed good performance for the NH3-SCR even after hydrothermal treatment at 900 °C for 4 h.

The ZSM-5 zeolite modified with Cu and Ce has attracted a lot of concern in recent years due to its good performance in the NH3-SCR reaction. Therefore, it is beneficial to prepare Cu, Ce co-modified mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite with nanosized particles. In this work, mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite assembled with nanocrystals was prepared by one-pot hydrothermal crystallization method in the presence of urea. The obtained mesoporous ZSM-5 was incorporated with Cu and Ce by ion-exchange method. The Cu, Ce co-modified mesoporous ZSM-5 zeolite showed excellent catalytic activity compared with conventional ZSM-5 and SBA-15 molecular sieves in the NH3-SCR reaction.

Experimental

Catalyst preparation

In a typical synthesis, 0.28 g aluminum sulfate octadecahydrate (Al2(SO4)3•18H2O) and 6.25 mL tetrapropylammonium hydroxide solution (TPAOH, 25%) were mixed with 3.75 mL of distilled water and stirred until clear. Five-milliliter tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) was then added under vigorous stirring for 6 h at room temperature. Next, 0.01 g sodium fluoride was added into the mixture and stirred for 0.5 h. The homogenous solution has the following molar ratios: 1 Al2O3: 50 SiO2: 8 TPAOH: 0.42 NaF: 1500 H2O. The obtained ZSM-5 precursor was mixed with the required amount of urea aqueous solution (0.165 g urea dissolved in 15 mL water). After stirring for another 30 min, the resultant gel mixture was transferred into Teflon-lined autoclave and heated at 100 °C for 48 h. To completely remove the templates, the collected precipitate was filtered, dried in air, and calcined at 550 °C for 6 h to obtain Na/MZ. This material was further ion-exchanged with a 0.1 M NH4NO3 solution at 80 °C for three times, followed by calcination at 500 °C for 5 h to form H/MZ. Subsequently, 1.0 g H/MZ material was ion-exchanged with 0.0075 M Cu(NO3)2 and 0.0075 M Ce(NO3)3 solution in 150 mL water at 80 °C for 2 h under stirring. To ensure complete exchange, this procedure was repeated three times. The resulting materials calcined in static air at 550 °C for 6 h were denoted as Cu-Ce/MZ in the following.

For comparison, we also prepared conventional ZSM-5. The synthesis steps were similar to those described above, with the exception that urea was not used. SBA-15 (Si: Al = 25) was also synthesized according to the literature (Wu et al. 2006). The ion-exchange method was applied to generate Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 as above.

Catalyst characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of the samples was carried out employing Cu Kα (λ = 0.15418 nm) radiation on the Shimadzu XRD-6000 diffractometer (Shimadzu, Japan) under the setting conditions of 40 kV, 30 mA, and a scan range from 5 to 40° with a scanning velocity of 5° min−1.

N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms were performed on a Quantachrome Autosorb iQ (Quantachrome, USA). Prior to the analysis, the samples were degassed at 573 K for 3 h. The elemental analysis was performed on inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent 7500ce).

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was conducted by a HITACHI H-8100 electron microscope (Hitachi, Japan) operated at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV.

The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed on a Thermo ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer (Thermo, USA), equipped with a monochromatized Al Ka X-ray source (1486.6 eV) and passing energy of 20 eV. The C 1-s peak (binding energy 284.8 eV) of adventitious carbon was used as a reference. XPS data from regions related to the Cu 2p and/or Ce 3d core levels were acquired.

Ammonia temperature–programmed desorption (NH3-TPD) was analyzed by the TP 5000-II multiple adsorption apparatus (Xianquan, China). The samples (~ 0.1 g) were pretreated at 500 °C for 60 min in the He flow, then cooled down to 100 °C and adsorbed ammonia for 30 min. Ammonia desorption was measured at a rate of 10 °C/min in the temperature range of 100–500 °C.

Catalytic test

The NH3-SCR activity of the samples was determined in a fixed bed quartz reactor at atmospheric pressure. A total of 300 mg catalyst was used in each run. The reactant gas consisted of 500 ppm NO, 500 ppm NH3, 5% O2, and balanced with N2. The total flow rate was 100 mL/min. All data were recorded at the desired temperature for 50 min to achieve a stable state. The NO and NO2 concentrations were continually monitored by a flue gas analyzer (MRU OPTIMA7). The NO conversion was measured based on the following equations:

$$ \mathrm{NO}\ \mathrm{conversion}\ \left[\%\right]=\frac{\left[\mathrm{NO}\right]\mathrm{inlet}-\left[\mathrm{NO}\right]\mathrm{outlet}}{\left[\mathrm{NO}\right]\mathrm{inlet}}\times 100\ \left[\%\right] $$

Results and discussion

XRD patterns

The XRD patterns of the Na/MZ, Cu-Ce/MZ, and Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 samples are shown in Fig. 1. All samples exhibit a typical MFI diffraction peak, which indicates that the original zeolite structure remains intact. However, the intensity of the diffraction peaks has significant differences. For Cu-Ce/MZ, the intensity of peaks decreases compared with those of Na/MZ, but the shift of peak position and diffraction peaks caused by Cu or Ce related compound or metal copper cannot be observed. These results indicate that the zeolite structures cannot be significantly influenced by the ion exchange processes and subsequent calcination treatment, and crystalline CuOx, CeOx, or Cu are not formed or rarely formed. The ion-exchange method can effectively disperse cupric and cerium ions in the zeolite framework (Song et al. 2015). The peak intensity for Cu-Ce/MZ after the ion-exchange process decreases, which demonstrates that the crystallinity decreases (Shan et al. 2008). The diffraction pattern of Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 zeolite is compared and analyzed, indicating the high crystallinity of microporous zeolite. The addition of Cu and Ce does not affect the mesoporous structure of Cu-Ce/SBA-15 as shown in Fig. S1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of the Na/MZ, Cu-Ce/MZ, and Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 samples

N2 adsorption-desorption results

N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the Na/MZ, Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/ZSM-5, and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 are depicted in Fig. 2, and their textural properties are illustrated in Table 1. The conventional Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 shows a type-I isotherm of microporous materials, and the BET surface area and total pore volume are calculated to be 340.3 m2/g and 0.26 cm3/g, which shrink slightly relative to the ZSM-5 (396.6 m2/g, 0.27 cm3/g). In contrast, Cu-Ce/MZ catalyst exhibits type-IV isotherm and H1 hysteresis loops in the region 0.45 < P/P0 < 0.85 due to the capillary condensation in the mesopores. It is clear that the addition of urea generates significant changes to the mesopore structures. The hysteresis loop of the Na/MZ without ion-exchange slightly shifts to a lower relative pressure (0.40 < P/P0 < 0.80), which indicates a smaller pore diameter, as shown in Table 1. The surface area (SBET), meso surface area (Smeso), total volume (Vtotal), and micro volume (Vmicro) of the parent zeolitic supports are 669.4 m2/g, 591.5 m2/g, 0.70 cm3/g, and 0.03 cm3/g for Na/MZ, and 512.8 m2/g, 459.0 m2/g, 0.68 cm3/g, and 0.02 cm3/g for Cu-Ce/MZ after the ion-exchange treatment, respectively. It is estimated that with the ion-exchange treatment, the pore structure of Cu-Ce/MZ samples was influenced slightly. The reduction of BET surface area and microporous volume is due to small oxide aggregates on the external surface, which partially block the zeolite pores and channels. These results indicate that metal ions are incorporated into the micropore space of H/MZ (Li et al. 2013). This further demonstrates that Cu-Ce/MZ possesses microporous/mesoporous structure and large specific surface area, which should increase the active components and benefit the diffusion-controlled reactions. In addition, Cu-Ce/SBA-15 exhibits a type-IV isotherm of mesoporous materials, and the BET surface area and total pore volume significantly decrease (404.4 m2/g, 0.76 cm3/g) after ion-exchange treatment compared with SBA-15 (684.7 m2/g, 0.78 cm3/g). This illustrates that SBA-15 with mesoporous has poor stability. N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of ZSM-5 and SBA-15 are shown in Fig. S2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms of the samples: Na/MZ, Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/ZSM-5, and Cu-Ce/SBA-15

Table 1 Textural properties and elemental compositions of catalysts

TEM imaging

The micro-morphology of the catalysts is characterized by TEM. The TEM image (Fig. 3a) of Cu-Ce/MZ shows the existence of disordered worm-like mesoporous structure, which should be beneficial for diffusion. Additionally, dark spots with sizes in the range of 10–20 nm are clearly visible due to the presence of metal oxide nanoparticles, which are highly dispersed without obvious agglomeration after ion-exchanged treatment. Similar conservation of metal oxide nanoparticles can be observed in Cu-Ce/SBA-15, while the 2D hexagonal mesoporous structure can also be preserved after metal loading (Fig. 3b). As TEM did not further illustrate the state and content of the metal oxide nanoparticles, a more detailed evaluation of the intrapore metal oxide species was accomplished by ICP-MS investigations (Table 1) and XPS analysis.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TEM images of a Cu-Ce/MZ and b Cu-Ce/SBA-15

XPS analysis

XPS analysis was undertaken to elucidate atomic concentrations on the surface and chemical state of Cu and Ce in the Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/SBA-15, and Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 samples. The XPS spectra of Cu 2p3/2 and Ce 3d of various catalysts are shown in Fig. 4, and the results are shown in Table 2. Figure 4 a displays the Cu 2p3/2 spectra, with peaks centered at 933.6 and 932.5 eV corresponding to Cu2+ and Cu+, respectively (Boningari et al. 2015). The results indicate that CuO and Cu2O species may be present in the Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/SBA-15, and Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 samples. The XPS spectra of the Ce 3d peaks are shown in Fig. 4b. The peaks located at 905.0 eV are arised from Ce3+3d3/2, and the peaks located at 884.4 eV are arised from Ce3+3d5/2, while the others can be assigned unambiguously to Ce4+ species (Song et al. 2015). The atomic concentrations of Cu and Ce on the surface of Cu-Ce/MZ are 0.05% and 0.11%, respectively, as presented in Table 2. Ce has high redox ability (Ce3+ ↔ Ce4+), excellent oxygen storage capacity, abundant oxygen vacancies, and oxygen ion transport characteristics, so the addition of Ce can increase the oxygen adsorption and promote the conversion of NO to NO2 in the NH3-SCR reaction (Xu et al. 2015). The high Ce3+/(Ce3++Ce4+) atomic ratio on Cu-Ce/MZ (39.0%) illustrates the presence of abundant surface oxygen vacancies and easier activation of reductants in the SCR reaction. Furthermore, the copper or cerium can be highly dispersed in the zeolite framework.

Fig. 4
figure 4

XPS spectra of the a Cu 2p3/2 and b Ce 3d regions for Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/SBA-15, and Cu-Ce/ZSM-5

Table 2 The surface compositions of the obtained samples

NH3-TPD results

The surface acidity of catalysts has an important effect on the NH3-SCR reaction (Brandenberger et al. 2009). The density and intensity of acid sites in Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/ZSM-5, and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 are determined by NH3-TPD (Fig. 5). Two NH3 desorption peaks are observed in the Cu-Ce/MZ and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 samples. The low-temperature peak at 200 °C is allocated to the weak Brønsted acid sites in the structure. The high-temperature peak at approximately 300 °C is associated with the strong Brønsted acid sites and Lewis acid sites (Si-OH-Al and Cu2+) in the structure (Wang et al. 2014). Furthermore, another desorption peak for Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 at a high temperature (450–600 °C) is related to the new Lewis acid sites created by the Cu species (Worch et al. 2011). Compared with those of the Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 samples, Cu-Ce/MZ shows slightly lower acidity. The strong acidity of Cu-Ce/SBA-15 (Si: Al = 25) originates from the framework aluminum species (Al-OH) due to the introduction of Al (Zhu et al. 2016). Although Cu-Ce/MZ catalyst shows the best NH3-SCR activity, its acid strength is less than that of the other catalysts. Therefore, it can be concluded that the relationship between acid strength and NH3-SCR performance is not linear, and the excellent catalytic performance is related to the proper amount of surface acidity (Pang et al. 2014).

Fig. 5
figure 5

NH3-TPD profiles of the Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/ZSM-5, and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 samples

NH3-SCR performance

The catalytic activities of different catalysts for the NH3-SCR reaction are displayed in Fig. 6. Pure H/MZ exhibits poor activity of about 35% NOx conversion in the whole temperature range due to lack of redox center, similar to SBA-15 (Zhu et al. 2016) and H-ZSM-5 (Iwasaki et al. 2008). Cu-Ce/MZ displays high NO conversion of 55.9% at 150 °C and 92.7% at 200 °C. For comparison, the catalytic activities of the Cu and Ce loaded on the conventional ZSM-5 and SBA-15 catalysts were also investigated. The Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 exhibits relatively low NO conversion at low temperatures, and maintains NO conversion below 80% until 200 °C. In addition, the activity of Cu-Ce/SBA-15 is also lower than that of Cu-Ce/MZ at low reaction temperatures, with NO conversion of 61.9% at 200 °C. The better catalytic activity of Cu-Ce/MZ can probably be attributed to the presence of mesopores, although the mesopore formation of the catalyst causes the reduction of crystallinity. The hierarchical micro-mesoporous structure of Cu-Ce/MZ can enhance the diffusion rate of ions, leading to high loading and good dispersion of Cu and Ce species in mesoporous zeolite channels (Yan et al. 2016). Additionally, internal mass transfer limitations are observed in the NH3-SCR of NOx over Cu-Ce/ZSM-5, although the molecular sizes of the reactants and products are much smaller than the channel dimension of ZSM-5 (Kustov et al. 2007). Therefore, Cu-Ce/MZ possesses a low kinetic limit and high catalytic activity at low reaction temperatures (< 200 °C) (Gao et al. 2013). Although the SBA-15 support can benefit metal loading and mass transfer due to its mesoporous structure and high surface area, it is not compatible with NH3-SCR processes due to its poor hydrothermal stability at high temperatures compared with that of the micropore zeolite.

Fig. 6
figure 6

NO conversion as a function of temperature during standard NH3-SCR for the Cu-Ce/MZ, Cu-Ce/ZSM-5, and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 samples. The reactant feed contained 500 ppm of NO, 500 ppm of NH3, 5% O2, and balanced with N2 (the total flow rate was 100 mL/min)

Conclusions

The mesoporous ZSM-5 was used as a support for Cu and Ce species in the NH3-SCR reaction, and the structure influence and physical-chemical properties of the support on catalytic activity were investigated in this study. Cu-Ce/MZ displayed higher NO conversion at 200 °C than the Cu-Ce/ZSM-5 and Cu-Ce/SBA-15 catalysts. The XRD results and N2 adsorption-desorption isotherms demonstrated that the high surface area and micro-mesoporous structure of the MZ was successfully maintained when Cu and Ce species were introduced by ion-exchange treatment. ICP-MS and TEM images showed that more active components were dispersed uniformly on the surface of the MZ than those on the microporous ZSM-5 and mesoporous SBA-15. The XPS results and NH3-TPD profiles illustrated that Cu-Ce/MZ exhibited abundant surface oxygen vacancies and strong acidity. Therefore, the high surface area, more and uniformly distributed active sites, and abundant oxidative species caused the excellent SCR performance of Cu-Ce/MZ.