Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) and metal-polluted sites caused by abandoned coking plants are receiving wide attention. To address the associated environmental concerns, innovative remediation technologies are urgently needed. This study was initiated to investigate the feasibility of a cleanup strategy that employed an initial phase, using methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MCD) solution to enhance ex situ soil washing for extracting PAHs and metals simultaneously, followed by the addition of PAH-degrading bacteria (Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2) and supplemental nutrients to treat the residual soil-bound PAHs. Elevated temperature (50 °C) in combination with ultrasonication (35 kHz, 30 min) at 100 g MCD L−1 was effective in extracting PAHs and metals to assist soil washing; 93 % of total PAHs, 72 % of Cd, 78 % of Ni, 93 % of Zn, 84 % of Cr, and 68 % of Pb were removed from soil after three successive washing cycles. Treating the residual soil-bound PAHs for 20 weeks led to maximum biodegradation rates of 34, 45, 36, and 32 % of the remaining total PAHs, 3-ring PAHs, 4-ring PAHs, and 5(+6)-ring PAHs after washing procedure, respectively. Based on BIOLOG Ecoplate assay, the combined treatment at least partially restored microbiological functions in the contaminated soil. The ex situ cleanup strategy through MCD-enhanced soil washing followed by microbial augmentation can be effective in remediating PAH and metal-contaminated soil.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are ubiquitous environmental pollutants. Excessive inputs from anthropogenic activities have caused serious environmental contamination and threaten to adversely affect human health (Wilcke 2007; Sun et al. 2011). With the signing of the Stockholm Convention and the development of global monitoring programs, many PAH-contaminated sites are left by numerous abandoned coking plants, thermal power plants, and steel plants in major metropolitan areas in China (Ni et al. 2010) and in many industrialized countries worldwide (Mouton et al. 2009; Dalgren et al. 2009). Soils from these sites are often contaminated by a mixture of PAHs and metals, such as Cd, Cr, Ni, Zn, and Pb (Ehsan et al. 2007; Khodadoust et al. 2005; Maturi and Reddy 2008). Currently, most of these contaminated sites face issues of land use conversion for commercial development (Ni et al. 2010) and may pose a threat to residents and the environment. Therefore, it is urgent to develop new soil remediation techniques that are suitable to meet the specific needs (Guo et al. 2009; Gong et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2007).
Proper remediation action to simultaneously remove PAHs and metals from contaminated sites is extremely essential (Ding et al. 2008). Ex situ soil washing in combination with environmentally friendly additives may be a promising technology for achieving the goal. Dalgren et al. (2009) investigated the effectiveness of both single and mixtures of different surfactants in removing PAHs and As from an old wood preservation site. They found that the combination of chelating agent methylglycine diacetic acid and biodegradable, nonionic surfactant alkyl polyglucoside showed very good removal capacity for both PAHs and As after 10 min of washing at 50 °C. Huguet and Marshall (2011) observed the highest level of mobilization in three soil washes using a mixture of 0.1 M [S,S]-ethyelnediaminedisuccinate and 2 % 2-[(Z)-octadec-9-enoxy]ethanol (Brij 98) at pH 9 with 20 min of ultrasonication treatment at room temperature. This strategy resulted in the removal of 70 % of As, 75 % of Cr, 80 % of Cu, 90 % of pentachlorophenol, and 79 % of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans that were initially detected in the soil. Sun et al. (2009) also demonstrated that simultaneous removal of PAHs and Cu from heavily contaminated soils was feasible by soil washing using an aqueous ethyelnediaminedisuccinate solution enhanced with ethyl lactate.
The ultimate goal of any remediation process must be not only to remove the contaminant from the polluted soil but also, most importantly, to restore soil health, i.e., its capacity to function (Epelde et al. 2009). Due to their high hydrophobicity and solid–water distribution ratio, often high initial concentrations, and aging processes of soil contamination, the extent and rate of PAH bioremediation are often limited (Talley et al. 2002; Yang et al. 2011). Thus, biodegradation of residual soil-bound PAHs through microbial catabolism may be needed as a follow-up procedure to fulfill the ultimate “cleanup” goal.
Cyclodextrins are nonhazardous and environmentally acceptable organic substances that have been shown to be biodegradable in soil and water after their introduction into an environmental system (Khodadoust et al. 2008). Because of their capacity to promote the release and microbial accessibility of contaminants in soils and solutions, cyclodextrins, such as methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MCD), have been the focus of several recent studies (Semple et al. 2007; Zhou and Zhu 2007; Stroud et al. 2009). MCD is a cyclic, bucket-shaped macromolecule with a hydrophilic exterior and a hydrophobic cavity, thereby increasing their aqueous solubility. MCD is also known to have low toxicity to bacteria and a relatively high water solubility (>500 g in 1,000 mL at 25 °C) (Petitgirard et al. 2009). Although it is known that MCD has the ability to enhance solubility and, thus, the removal of PAHs from soil, few studies have taken into account the coexistence of PAHs and metals in soil as well as the subsequent biodegradation of residual soil-bound PAHs facilitated with specific PAH-degrading bacterium.
Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the utilization of MCD solution for the simultaneous soil washing of a soil contaminated with a mixture of PAHs and metals. The influence of certain factors (i.e., MCD concentration, washing temperature, ultrasonication, and cycles of successive washing) on the removal efficiency was examined. The subsequent biodegradation of residual soil-bound PAHs by inoculation with Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2 was also determined. The effectiveness of the cleanup strategy was assessed using biological tests.
Materials and methods
Chemicals and media
PAH standards (purity >99.5 %, 1,000 ng μL−1 Nap, 1,000 ng μL−1 Ace, 1,000 ng μL−1 Acy, 100 ng μL−1 Flu, 50 ng μL−1 Phe, 50 ng μL−1 AnT, 50 ng μL−1 FluA, 50 ng μL−1 Pyr, 1 ng μL−1 BaA, 50 ng μL−1 Chry, 1 ng μL−1 B[b]F, 1 ng μL−1 B[k]F, 5 ng μL−1 B[a]P, 10 ng μL−1 DBA, 5 ng μL−1 B[ghi]P, and 10 ng μL−1 IP), aqueous metal standard solutions of Cd, Ni, Zn, Cr, and Pb (1,000 mg L−1), and MCD (purity >98 %) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC, USA. Hexane and acetonitrile (HPLC grade) were from Tedia Company, USA. Acetone, cyclohexane, and dichloromethane (analytical grade, Nanjing Chemical Reagent Co.) were distilled prior to use. Anhydrous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) was heated at 200 °C for 4 h. Silica gel (100 mesh) was first activated at 130 °C for 2 h and, then, deactivated by adding deionized water (3 % of the silica gel weight), further homogenized, and equilibrated for 6 h before use. Distilled deionized water was obtained using a Millipore-Q purification system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Other chemical reagents were all of analytical grade. Minimal medium (MM) contained (per liter) 0.2 g MgSO4·2H2O, 20 mg CaCl2·2H2O, 10 mg FeSO4·7H2O, 0.4 g KH2PO4, 0.6 g Na2HPO4, 20 mg MnSO4·H2O, and 1 g NH4NO3. Nutrient agar medium contained 0.5 % peptone, 0.3 % yeast extract, 1.5 % agar, and 0.5 % NaCl (pH 7.0).
Soil preparation
All soil samples were taken from an abandoned coking plant located in the old city district of Beijing, China. This plant was in operation between the 1960s and the 2000s. Soil samples were collected from the surface to a depth of 2 m, where high concentration with PAHs and metals was detected. All samples were homogenized and ground to pass a 2-mm sieve. A portion of the sample was air-dried for 7 days at room temperature, and the remaining sample was kept moist and stored in sealed glass bottles at 4 °C prior to analysis. Physical–chemical analysis shows that the soil has a pH (in water) of 6.2 and contains 9.8 % sand, 53.3 % silt, 36.9 % clay, 2.2 % organic matter, 1.2 g kg−1 total N (C/N = 11:1), 63.6 mg kg−1 hydrolysable N, 0.43 g kg−1 total P, 78.7 mg kg−1 available P, and 11.3 g kg−1 total K on a dry weight basis. The sum of 16 PAHs was 135.2 ± 7.3 mg kg−1 dry soil, with individual 3-, 4-, 5(+6)-ring PAH concentrations of 16.2 ± 1.4, 54.4 ± 2.0, and 64.6 ± 1.4 mg kg−1, respectively (Table 1). The total concentrations of Cd, Ni, Zn, Cr, and Pb were 11.7 ± 0.8, 135.2 ± 8.7, 236.0 ± 13.8, 310.3 ± 13.4, and 236.0 ± 9.8 mg kg−1 dry soil, respectively.
Soil washing
In a 2-L flask with a Teflon-lined cap, 100 g of contaminated soil was placed, to which 1 L of different washing solvents was added. Four treatments were tested, including (1) MCD + 25 °C, (2) MCD + 50 °C, (3) MCD + 25 °C + ultrasonication, and (4) MCD + 50 °C + ultrasonication. Each treatment was replicated four times. The operating concentrations of MCD solution (w/v) were 0, 50, 100, 150, 200, or 250 g L−1. The flask was shaken at 25 ± 2 or 50 ± 2 °C at 100 rpm for 60 min. Ultrasonication was done after shaking by an ultrasonic homogenizer tuned to 35 kHz for 30 min (XL 2020 Sonic dismembrator, extended horn of 25 × 1.2 cm, Misonix, Farmingdale, NY). Soil was separated from supernatant by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 30 min before further extractions and analyses.
Since preliminary tests indicated that a single washing cycle would not be sufficient to extract most of the PAHs and metals from the test soil under the conditions, successive washings of five cycles were tested to evaluate removal efficiency. At the end of each washing process, the soil was analyzed as described in Section 1.5. Soils after successive washings were combined and air-dried for subsequent microcosm studies.
Biodegradation
Bacterial strain and culture conditions
Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2 was isolated from a historically PAH-contaminated soil collected from Wuxi, Jiangsu Province, Eastern China (Teng et al. 2010b). This strain was screened for its ability to degrade high-molecular-weight (HMW) PAHs, including fluoranthene, pyrene, and benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P). After inoculation into the MM medium containing B[a]P at 3.0 mg L−1 for 5 days, 89.7 % of the B[a]P was degraded by the bacterium. When this strain was grown with pyrene and fluoranthene at 50 mg L−1 for 7 days, 47 and 85 % of these were degraded, respectively. This strain may therefore have the potential to improve HMW PAH biodegradation. Strain HPD-2 was cultured on a slant of nutrient agar medium. After 3 days of incubation at 28 °C, the slant was used to inoculate two 500-mL Erlenmeyer flasks each containing 100 mL of liquid medium containing 3 g beef extract and 5 g peptone per liter. The flasks were incubated for 48 h at 28 °C on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm and produced cell suspensions of approximately 2 × 108 CFU L−1. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000×g for 20 min, washed twice with autoclaved saline solution, and then resuspended in saline solution.
A nutrient solution (N, P) containing NH4NO3 and K2HPO4/KH2PO4 was prepared. This solution contained 47.5 g N L−1 and 2.80 g P L−1; 500 mL of nutrient solution was combined with 50 mL of the above-prepared cell suspension to establish an inoculum population of 1.7 × 107 CFU L−1 to be used for the soil microcosm experiment.
Soil microcosms
Soil microcosms were set up using a series of beakers (upper diameter 11.5 cm, lower diameter 9 cm, height 18.5 cm) covered with tin foil, each containing 1,000 g of washed air-dried soil. Soil microcosms were inoculated with 80 mL strain inoculum (NI) prepared as above for bioaugumentation. Control microcosms were prepared with the addition of nutrient solution (CK). The final soil N/P ratio is 10:1. Soils in the microcosms were adjusted to 60 % water holding capacity (WHC) with sterilized DI water and maintained at this WHC during incubation by adjusting the weight of the microcosm every 3 days. Each treatment was replicated four times. The microcosms were incubated in a controlled climate chamber for 20 weeks at 28 ± 0.5 °C. Every 2 weeks, approximately 20 g of soil samples was collected from each microcosm using a mini stainless steel soil drill. Each sample was divided into two parts, one was placed in a small plastic bag and stored at 4 °C for subsequent analysis of microbial activity while the other was freeze-dried and passed through a 60-mesh sieve prior to analysis for PAHs.
Extraction and analysis of PAH and metal
PAHs in soil samples were extracted using the Soxhlet extraction procedure (EPA method 3540c). Briefly, 5 g of freeze-dried sample was placed over a filter paper in a porous cellulose thimble (25 × 70 mm) which is inside a Soxhlet extractor. The extractor was then fitted to a 100-mL round bottom flask containing 60 mL dichloromethane, and the extraction was performed for 24 h. All extracts in the round bottom flasks were dried by rotary evaporation. The residues were dissolved in 2 mL cyclohexane, and 0.5 mL of the solute was transferred, purified with a silica gel column (8 × 220 mm) and washed with a mixture of hexane and dichloromethane (1:1). The first 1 mL of eluent was discarded because it contained nonpolar saturated hydrocarbons and was less retained than PAHs by silica gel. The second 2-mL aliquot of eluent was collected, dried by sparging with N2 and then redissolved in 1 mL of acetonitrile for subsequent HPLC determination. Determination of 16 PAHs was carried out according to the method of Ni et al. (2008). Briefly, analysis was conducted on a Shimadzu Class-VP HPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan), with a fluorescence detector (RF-10AXL). A reversed phase column C18 (VPODS 150 4.6 mm I. D., particle size 5 mm), using a mobile phase of water and acetonitrile mixture (1:9, v/v) at a constant solvent flow rate of 0.5 mL min−1, was used to separate the 16 PAHs. The excitation and emission wavelengths were set specifically for each individual PAH.
An external standard was used for the quantification of the 16 PAHs. The detection limit of the HPLC method for PAHs was in the range of 0.12–1.57 μg kg−1. Method blanks (solvent) and spiked blanks (standards of EPA610 PAH mixture, LA 96245, Supelco, USA used to spike the soil) were extracted and analyzed by the methods described above. Recoveries and relative standard deviations for the 16 PAHs were in the ranges of 74–110 and 0.53–3.57 %, respectively. When blanks extracted under the same conditions were below detection limits, sample results are presented without recovery ratio correction.
The total concentrations of Cd, Ni, Zn, Cr, and Pb were determined by digesting 2 g of soil samples using 50 mL concentrated HCL–HNO3–HClO4 (4:2:1, v/v/v) and were quantified with a thermo flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (Liu et al. 2011). For quality assurance, replicate samples, blanks, and a certified reference material were included in all analyses.
The percentage removal of PAH and metal was calculated as follows:
where Ms is the concentration of PAH or metal in each treatment and Mi is the initial PAH or metal concentration in the soil.
Physiological profiles of the soil microbial community
Physiological profiles of the soil microbial community were obtained as described by Yao et al. (2003). Briefly, 10 g of fresh soil was added to 100 mL of distilled water in a 250-mL flask and shaken for 10 min. Following tenfold serial dilutions, the 10−3 dilution was used to inoculate BIOLOG® ECOplates (BIOLOG, Hayward, CA). The plates were incubated at 25 °C, and microbial growth in each well was recorded as optical density (OD) at 590 nm with a plate reader at 12-h intervals. Microbial activity was expressed as average well-color development (AWCD) determined as follows:
where ODi is the optical density of each well. The Shannon–Weaver index (H) was calculated using an OD of 0.25 as the threshold for a positive response (Garland 1996). The Shannon–Weaver index (H) and Simpson's diversity index (λ) (Simpson 1949) were calculated as follows:
where p i is the ratio of the activity on each substrate (OD i ) to the sum of activities on all substrates (∑OD i ).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using the SPSS 14.0 for Windows software package. Data were analyzed by two-way analysis of variance. Mean values were compared by least significant difference (LSD) at probability level ≤5 %.
Results and discussion
Removal of PAH from soil
Ex situ soil washing has been proposed as a strategy to enhance remediation of PAH-contaminated sites (Ahn et al. 2008; Pannu et al. 2004; Subramaniam et al. 2004). In the present study, all treatments showed significant removal of total PAHs, 3-ring PAHs, 4-ring PAHs, and 5(+6)-ring PAHs using the tested washing parameters (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1). PAH removals were 57–79 % in treatments containing MCD but only 2–10 % in treatments without MCD. It has long been recognized that high hydrophobicity and initial concentration as well as aging processes promote adsorption of PAH to soil particles and therefore hinder their solubility for effective removal from soil. The obtained data are consistent with previous findings that MCD can facilitate solubilization of a nonpolar solute in water (Badr et al. 2004; Fava et al. 2003; Hanna et al. 2004).
Although PAH removal efficiency increased with increasing MCD concentrations from 25 to 100 g L−1, a slight decrease of PAH removal efficiency was observed at 150 g L−1 and a significant reduction was detected from 200 to 250 g L−1 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 1). This phenomenon may be caused by the chemical nature of MCD in aqueous phase. Viscosity of MCD solution increased with the increasing concentration (Allan et al. 2006; Allan et al. 2007). Among the processes controlling the removal, of particular importance in ex situ soil washing is desorption because it is often a rate-limiting factor for extraction (Kraaij et al. 2002; Leppanen et al. 2003). High viscosity of MCD solution would hamper the transfer of PAH from soil particle to aqueous phase. Therefore, 100 g L−1 was chosen as the MCD concentration to be used in the developed cleanup procedure.
Data in Fig.1 revealed that the PAH removal performance was affected by temperature and ultrasonication. The extent of PAH removal was greatly enhanced when relatively high temperatures were employed (p < 0.01) (Table 2). When employed, the use of 100 g L−1 MCD at 50 °C, approximately 73.3 ± 2.1 % of PAH was desorbed compared with 57.1 ± 3.2 % PAH at 25 °C. This could be attributed to the fact that higher temperature led to a decrease in partition coefficients between contaminants and soil particles, thereby increased desorption rates of PAH from the solid to the aqueous phase. On the other hand, ultrasonication also played a positive role in desorption of PAH. The highest extraction of 66.5 ± 2.4 % PAH was achieved when ultrasonication was introduced (Fig. 1). It was suggested that ultrasonication induced high fluid–solid shear stresses, which promoted mechanical detachment and removal of contaminants (Shrestha et al. 2009; Yin et al. 2004). Abrasion of surface cleaning and leaching of more deeply entrenched material were suggested as two basic mechanisms for acoustically enhanced soil washing (Mao et al. 2004; Mason 2006). Therefore, the combination of elevated temperature and ultrasonication in treatment of this study showed the highest PAH removal rate of 79.6 ± 2.2 %. PAH removal was further significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced by the addition of MCD at 100 g L−1. Temperature and ultrasonication showed significant interactions (Ftemperature = 7,136.0, Fultrasonication = 1,973.2, Ftemperature × Fultrasonication = 109.0, p < 0.01). The obtained results support previous findings that when two types of external energy were applied simultaneously, the decreased viscosity of fluid phase would lead to increased flow rate. As a result, the adsorbed contaminants were mobilized, cavitation was developed, and porosity and permeability were increased, which ultimately resulted in increased removal efficiency (Chung and Kamon 2005; Kim and Wang 2003).
Removal of metal from soil
In addition to PAH removal, the above-tested procedure also led to the removal of metals (Cd, Ni, Zn, Cr, and Pb) (Fig. 2). Similar to the removal efficacy of PAH, the total removal of metals was less than 5 % in the treatments without MCD addition and increased with increasing the concentration of MCD solution from 25 to 100 g L−1, but it was followed by significant reductions (p < 0.05) from 150 to 250 g L−1. MCD possesses high aqueous solubility due to hydroxyl functional groups on their exterior but has a hydrophobic organic cavity in the interior which allows complexation of metals (Fava et al. 2003; Hanna et al. 2004). The presence of MCD may facilitate metal transfer from soil particles to aqueous phase. However, a high concentration of MCD could also hinder the desorption process. In addition, elevated temperature and ultrasonication further enhanced the desorption of contaminants. Therefore, the combination of these two types of external energy in addition to 100 g L−1 MCD had significant effects on metal removal, (Table 3) which resulted in the greatest extraction capacity for Cd, Ni, Zn, Cr, and Pb which was 51.4 ± 1.3, 63.6 ± 2.6, 72.3 ± 1.3, 68.5 ± 3.3, and 45.5 ± 2.4 %, respectively. Of the four treatments evaluated, the extraction capacity was in the following order: MCD + 50 °C + ultrasonication > MCD + 50 °C > MCD + 25 °C + ultrasonication > MCD + 25 °C.
Successive washing of PAH and metal from soil
By comparing the potential extraction efficiency of PAH and metals simultaneously, the treatment which involves elevated temperature and ultrasonication at 100 g L−1 MCD was selected as the better washing parameters for further application. Successive five washing cycles were tested (Table 4). The cumulative removal of PAH and metal increased with increasing washing cycles as expected. Approximately 94.3 ± 4.0 % of PAH, 76.0 ± 6.3 % of Cd, 82.6 ± 5.9 % of Ni, 95.9 ± 6.5 % of Zn, 87.8 ± 0.8 % of Cr, and 73.5 ± 1.9 % of Pb were extracted after five extraction cycles. Findings reported in literatures suggested high percentages of contaminants being desorbed in soils with relatively low organic matter contents (Khodadoust et al. 2008; Ehsan et al. 2007). The relatively high extraction efficiency achieved in this study could be due to the relatively low organic matter content in the tested soil (2.2 %). In fact, PAH and metals desorbed relatively quickly during the first three washing cycles (Table 4). Soil washing of more than three cycles made limited contributions to desorption of contaminants. The impact of washing cycles on desorption of contaminants varied among metals tested. The obtained results are consistent with our hypothesis that ex situ soil washing is a balanced redistribution of contaminants between solid and liquid phases. Because the high initial concentrations of contaminants occurred in the soil over 40 years ago, it is possible that long period of interactions led to increased adsorption of the contaminants. Once the transfer of contaminants achieved a steady state during successive washing cycles, the redistribution of contaminants reached a relative equilibrium. To be cost effective, successive washing of three cycles was chosen in the developed procedure.
Besides, though successive washings efficiently removed PAH and metals from the soil in the laboratory scale, further studies involving different soil types and contaminants under field conditions will be required to elucidate the potential applicability of this strategy. For instance, washing solution will not be eliminated so strongly in situ, and the availability, mobility, and biodegradability of the pollutants may be higher and give different results. Also, systematic research on the influencing factors (i.e., soil/solution ratio, washing cycles, mixing speed, and so on) in relation to removal efficiency of contaminants should be paid further attention.
Biodegradation of residual soil-bound PAHs
Based on microcosm evaluations, inoculation of PAH-degrading bacterium (Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2) with nutrient addition promoted biodegradation of residual soil-bound PAHs (Fig. 3). Effect of bacterial and nutrient addition on metals concentration was not detected because most metals are extremely difficult to be biodegraded but may change metal speciation and bioavailability. It is generally accepted that a low level of bioavailability is one of the most important factors leading to the slow biodegradation of hydrophobic organic compounds in soils. In particular, after three cycles of soil washing, the residual PAHs are bound tightly with soil organic and inorganic components, resulting in an extremely low level of bioavailability (Kraaij et al. 2002). The PAH-degrading bacteria need to secrete various enzymes and regulate physiological metabolism process to adapt to the microcosm (Ding et al. 2008; Epelde et al. 2009). Therefore, the biodegradation process displayed a lag phase in the first six weeks (Fig. 3a), with no more than 8.0 ± 1.3 % of the PAH being degraded. However, the PAH biodegradation rate increased significantly in the following 14 weeks (p < 0.05). The maximum biodegradation percentage for total PAH, 3-ring PAHs, 4-ring PAHs, and 5(+6)-ring PAHs were 33.9 ± 2.1, 45.3 ± 2.3, 36.4 ± 1.0, and 31.8 ± 2.4 %, respectively. Twenty weeks of biodegradation resulted in a significant decrease in the concentration of total PAHs, 4-ring PAHs, and 5(+6)-ring PAHs in the soil microcosms (Fig. 3b).
Assessment of soil microbial community
To assess the influence of the developed cleanup strategy on soil microbial community, BIOLOG Ecoplate assay was conducted to reveal soil culturable microbial functional diversity (Fig. 4 and Table 5).
The AWCD reflects the sole-carbon-source utilization ability of the soil bacterial community and a measure of soil bacteria activity (Garland 1996). Shannon–Weaver index is a measure of actual richness and evenness of the bacterial population, while Simpson index is used to quantify the number of species as well as the relative abundance of each species (Garland 1996; Simpson 1949). Washing followed by 20 weeks of biodegradation led to increased AWCD as well as Shannon–Weaver and Simpson indices. These results confirmed the findings by Teng et al. (2010a, b) in that 28 days of bioremediation with Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2 inoculation and nutrient addition led to marked enhancement of microbial functional diversity. It can be concluded that in spite of the addition of degrading bacteria and nutrient additional reduction of a few percents, the combination of PAH-degrading bacterial inoculation and nutrient addition resulted in at least partial restoration of the microbiological functioning in the contaminated soil.
Conclusions
Successive washing of three cycles using the combined treatment of elevated temperature and ultrasonication at 100 g L−1 MCD was shown to be effective in removing PAH and metal contaminants in soil. The subsequent bioremediation with Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2 inoculation and nutrient addition strengthened the biodegradation of residual soil-bound PAH. The combined cleanup strategy is an environmentally friendly technology, evidenced by the increased microbial functional diversity in soil after completing the treatment.
References
Ahn CK, Kim YM, Woo SH, Park JM (2008) Soil washing using various nonionic surfactants and their recovery by selective adsorption with activated carbon. J Hazard Mater 154:153–160
Allan IJ, Semple KT, Hare R, Reid BJ (2006) Prediction of mono and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in spiked soils using cyclodextrin extraction. Environ Pollut 144:562–571
Allan IJ, Semple KT, Hare R, Reid BJ (2007) Cyclodextrin enhanced biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phenols in contaminated soil slurries. Environ Sci Technol 41:5498–5504
Badr T, Hanna K, Brauer C (2004) Enhanced solubilization and removal of naphthalene and phenanthrene by cyclodextrins from two contaminated soils. J Hazard Mater 112:215–223
Chung HI, Kamon M (2005) Ultrasonically enhanced electrokinetic remediation for removal of Pb and phenanthrene in contaminated soils. Eng Geol 77:233–242
Dalgren KE, Arwidsson Z, Camdzija A, Sjöberg R, Ribé V, Waara S, Allard B, Kronhelm T, Hees PAW (2009) Laboratory and pilot scale soil washing of PAH and arsenic from a wood preservation site: changes in concentration and toxicity. J Hazard Mater 172:1033–1040
Ding J, Cong J, Zhou J, Gao SX (2008) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation and extracellular enzyme secretion in agitated and stationary cultures of Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J Environ Sci-China 20:88–93
Ehsan S, Prasher SO, Marshall WD (2007) Simultaneous mobilization of metals and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) compounds from soil with cyclodextrin and EDTA in admixture. Chemosphere 68:150–158
Epelde L, Mijangos I, Becerril JM, Garbisu C (2009) Soil microbial community as bioindicator of the recovery of soil functioning derived from metal phytoextraction with sorghum. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1788–1794
Fava F, Bertin L, Fedi S, Zannoni D (2003) Methyl-β-cyclodextrin-enhanced solubilization and aerobic biodegradation of polychlorinated biphenyls in two aged-contaminated soils. Biotech Bioeng 81:381–390
Garland JL (1996) Analytical approaches to the characterization of sample microbial communities using patterns of potential C source utilization. Soil Biol Biochem 28:213–221
Gong ZQ, Wang XG, Tu Y, Wu JB, Sun YF, Li P (2010) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon removal from contaminated soils using fatty acid methyl esters. Chemosphere 79:138–143
Guo HQ, Liu ZY, Yang SG, Sun C (2009) The feasibility of enhanced soil washing of p-nitrochlorobenzene (pNCB) with SDBS/Tween80 mixed surfactants. J Hazard Mater 170:1236–1241
Hanna K, Brauer C, Germain P (2004) Cyclodextrin-enhanced solubilization of pentachlorophenol in water. J Environ Manage 71:1–8
Huguet MR, Marshall WD (2011) Scaling up a treatment to simultaneously remove persistent organic pollutants and heavy metals from contaminated soils. Chemosphere 83:668–673
Khodadoust AP, Reddy KR, Maturi K (2005) Effect of different extraction agents on metal and organic contaminant removal from a field soil. J Hazard Mater 117:15–24
Khodadoust AP, Omprasad N, Chandrasekaran S (2008) Cyclodextrin-enhanced extraction and removal of 2,4-dinitrotoluene from contaminated soils. Environ Eng Sci 25:615–626
Kim YU, Wang MC (2003) Effect of ultrasound on oil removal from soils. Ultrasonics 41:539–542
Kraaij R, Seinen W, Tolls J (2002) Direct evidence of sequestration in sediments affecting the bioavailability of hydrophobic organic chemicals to benthic deposit-feeders. Environ Sci Technol 36:3525–3529
Leppanen MT, Landrum PF, Kukkonen JVK (2003) Investigating the role of desorption on the bioavailability of sediment-associated 3,4,3′,4′,-tetrachlorobiphenyl in benthic invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:2861–2871
Liu L, Wu LH, Li N, Luo YM, Li SL, Li Z, Han CL, Jiang YG, Christie P (2011) Rhizosphere concentrations of zinc and cadmium in a metal contaminated soil after repeated phytoextraction by sedum plumbizincicola. Int J Phytoremediat 13:750–764
Mao T, Hong SY, Show KY, Tay JH, Lee DJ (2004) A comparison of ultrasound treatment on primary and secondary sludges. Water Sci Technol 50:91–97
Mason TJ (2006) Sonochemistry and the environment—providing a “green” link between chemistry, physics and engineering. Ultrason Sonochem 14:476–483
Maturi K, Reddy KR (2008) Extractants for the removal of mixed contaminants from soils. Soil Sediment Contam 17:586–608
Mouton J, Mercier G, Drogui P, Blais JF (2009) Experimental assessment of an innovative process for simultaneous PAHs and Pb removal from polluted soils. Sci Total Environ 407:5402–5410
Ni JZ, Luo YM, Wei R, Li XH (2008) Distribution patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons among different organic carbon fractions of polluted agricultural soils. Geoderma 146:277–282
Ni JZ, Luo YM, Wei R, Li XH (2010) Distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in particle-size separates and density fractions of typical agricultural soils in the Yangtze River Delta. Eur J Soil Sci 59:1020–1026
Pannu JK, Singh A, Ward OP (2004) Vegetable oil as a contaminated soil remediation amendment: application of peanut oil for extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon from soil. Proc Biochem 39:1211–1216
Petitgirard A, Djehiche M, Persello J, Fievet P, Fatin RN (2009) PAH contaminated soil remediation by reusing an aqueous solution of cyclodextrins. Chemosphere 75:714–718
Semple KT, Doick KJ, Wick LY, Harms H (2007) Microbial interactions with organic contaminants in soil: definitions, processes and measurement. Environ Pollut 150:166–176
Shrestha RA, Pham TD, Sillanpää M (2009) Effect of ultrasound on removal of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) from different types of soils. J Hazard Mater 170:871–875
Simpson EH (1949) Measurement of diversity. Nature 163:668
Stroud JL, Tzima M, Paton GI, Semple KT (2009) Influence of hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin on the biodegradation of 14C-phenanthrene and 14C-hexadecane in soil. Environ Pollut 157:2678–2683
Subramaniam K, Stepp C, Pignatello JJ, Smets BF, Grasso D (2004) Enhancement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon desorption by complexing agents in weathered soil. Environ Eng Sci 21:515–523
Sun YY, Ji LL, Wang W, Wang XR, Wu JC, Li H, Guo HY (2009) Simultaneous removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and copper from soils using ethyl lactate-amended EDDS solution. J Environ Qual 38:1591–1597
Sun MM, Fu DQ, Teng Y, Shen YY, Luo YM, Li ZG, Christie P (2011) In situ phytoremediation of PAH-contaminated soil by intercropping alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) with tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) and associated soil microbial activity. J Soil Sediment 11:980–989
Talley JW, Ghosh U, Tucker SG, Furey JS, Luthy RG (2002) Particle-scale understanding of the bioavailability of PAHs in sediment. Environ Sci Technol 36:477–483
Teng Y, Luo YM, Ping LF, Zou DX, Li ZG, Christie P (2010a) Effects of soil amendment with different carbon sources and other factors on the bioremediation of an aged PAH-contaminated soil. Biodegradation 21:167–178
Teng Y, Luo YM, Sun MM, Liu ZJ, Li ZG, Christie P (2010b) Effect of bioaugmentation by Paracoccus sp. strain HPD-2 on the soil microbial community and removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from an aged contaminated soil. Bioresour Technol 101:3437–3443
Wilcke W (2007) Global patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil. Geoderma 141:157–166
Yang Y, Zhang N, Xue M, Lu ST, Tao S (2011) Effects of soil organic matter on the development of the microbial polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) degradation potentials. Environ Pollut 159:591–595
Yao HY, Xu JM, Huang CY (2003) Substrate utilization pattern, biomass and activity of microbial communities in a sequence of heavy metal-polluted paddy soils. Geoderma 115:139–148
Yin X, Han P, Lu XP, Wang Y (2004) A review on dewaterability of biosludge and ultrasound pretreatment. Ultrason Sonochem 11:337–348
Yu HS, Zhu LZ, Zhou WJ (2007) Enhanced desorption and biodegradation of phenanthrene in soil–water systems with the presence of anionic-nonionic mixed surfactants. J Hazard Mater 142:354–361
Zhou WJ, Zhu LZ (2007) Efficiency of surfactant-enhanced desorption for contaminated soils depending on the component characteristics of soil- surfactant–PAHs system. Environ Pollut 147:66–73
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Project BK2009016), the Chinese National Environmental Protection Special Funds for Scientific Research on Public Causes (Project 2010467016), and the Chinese National High Technology Research and Development Program (863 Program) (Project 2007AA061101).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Robert Duran
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, M., Luo, Y., Teng, Y. et al. Remediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and metal-contaminated soil by successive methyl-β-cyclodextrin-enhanced soil washing–microbial augmentation: a laboratory evaluation. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20, 976–986 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1064-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1064-0