Abstract
While conceptual modeling is strongly related to the final quality of the software product, conceptual modeling itself remains a challenging activity. In particular, modelers must ensure that conceptual models properly formalize their intended conceptualization of a domain. This paper proposes an approach to facilitate the validation process of conceptual models defined in OntoUML by transforming these models into specifications in the logic-based language Alloy and using its analyzer to generate instances of the model and assertion counter-examples. By allowing the observation of sequences of snapshots of model instances, the dynamics of object creation, classification, association and destruction are revealed. This confronts the modeler with the implications of modeling choices and allows them to uncover mistakes or gain confidence in the quality of conceptual models.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Anastasakis K, Bordbar B, Georg G, Ray I (2009) On challenges of model transformation from uml to alloy. Softw Syst Model (to appear)
Bachman CW, Daya M (1977) The role concept in data models. In: VLDB ’1977: Proceedings of the third international conference on Very large data bases, VLDB Endowment, pp 464–476
Beato ME, Barrio-Solórzano M, Cuesta CE (2004) UML automatic verification tool (TABU). In: SAVCBS’04: Specification and verification of component-based systems at ACM SIGSOFT 2004/FSE-12
Benevides AB, Guizzardi G (2009) A model-based tool for conceptual modeling and domain ontology engineering in ontouml. In: Filipe J, Cordeiro J (eds) ICEIS. Lecture notes in business information processing, vol 24. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 528–538
Benevides AB, Guizzardi G, Braga BFB, Almeida JPA (2009) Assessing modal aspects of ontouml conceptual models in alloy. In: Heuser CA, Pernul G (eds) Proceedings of the first international workshop on evolving theories of conceptual modelling (ETheCoM 2009). 28th international conference on conceptual modeling (ER 2009). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS), vol 5833. Springer, Gramado, pp 55–64
Boehm B, Basili VR (2001) Software defect reduction top 10 list. Computer 34(1): 135–137
Gogolla M, Büttner F, Richters M (2007) Use: a uml-based specification environment for validating uml and ocl. Sci Comput Program 69: 27–34
Guizzardi G (2005) Ontological foundations for structural conceptual models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, Enschede
Jackson D (2006) Software abstractions: logic, language, and analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge
Maintainers (2009) UML2Alloy. http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~bxb/UML2Alloy
Massoni T, Gheyi R, Borba P (2004) A uml class diagram analyzer. In: Third international workshop on critical systems development with UML. Affiliated with 7th UML conference, pp 143–153
Mylopoulos J (1992) Conceptual Modeling, databases, and case: an integrated view of information systems development. In: Conceptual Modeling and Telos, chap. Wiley, Chichester, pp 49–68
OMG (2009) UML 2.2 superstructure specification. Technical report, Object Management Group (OMG)
Papazoglou MP, Krämer BJ (1997) A database model for object dynamics. VLDB J 6(2): 073–096
Pastor O, Molina JC (2007) Model-driven architecture in practice: a software production environment based on conceptual modeling. Springer, New York
Schinz I, Toben T, Mrugalla C, Westphal B (2004) The rhapsody uml verification environment. In: SEFM ’04: Proceedings of the software engineering and formal methods. Second international conference. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 174–183
USA Department of Defense (DoD) (2007) DoD modeling and simulation (M&S) management. Directive 5000.59
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work has been supported by Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and by Fundação de Apoio à Ciência e Tecnologia do Espírito Santo (FAPES) in the scope of the INFRA-MODELA project.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Braga, B.F.B., Almeida, J.P.A., Guizzardi, G. et al. Transforming OntoUML into Alloy: towards conceptual model validation using a lightweight formal method. Innovations Syst Softw Eng 6, 55–63 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-009-0120-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11334-009-0120-5