Abstract
The degradation of total oil and grease (TOG) in crude oil-contaminated soil in the presence of Cyperus brevifolius (Rottb.) Hassk was investigated in a net house study. C. brevifolius plants were transplanted in to spiked soil containing 8% (w/w) crude oil. The capability of plant for enhancing the biodegradation process was tested in pots containing fertilized and unfertilized soil over a 360-day period. Analysis of the degradation of hydrocarbon contaminants, plant growth, and biomass was conducted at 60-day interval. In the presence of contaminants, plant biomass and height were significantly reduced. The specific root surface area was reduced under the effects of crude oil. Concerning TOG content in soil, C. brevifolius could decrease up to 86.2% in TA (crude oil-contaminated soil with fertilizer) and 61.2% in TC (crude oil-contaminated soil without fertilizer). In the unvegetated pots, the reduction of TOG was 13.7% in TB (crude oil-contaminated soil with fertilizer) and 12.5% in TD (crude oil-contaminated soil without fertilizer). However, biodegradation was significantly more in vegetated pots than in unvegetated pots (p = 0.05). The addition of fertilizer had positive effect on TOG degradation in the presence of C. brevifolius compared to the unfertilized treatments. Thus, there was evidence of C. brevifolius enhancing the biodegradation of crude oil in soil under the conditions of this experiment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
Contamination of water and soil by crude oil as a result of exploration, production, maintenance, transportation, storage, and accidental release has caused significant environmental impacts presents substantial hazards to human health. Phytoremediation requires no excavation and transportation of contaminated media or cumbersome physical, chemical, or thermal procedures; thus it is more cost-effective (Cunningham et al. 1995). Roots possess soluble and wall-bound oxidative enzymes that may be directly involved in the dissipation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and can also be taken up by plants and transformed or stored in a nonphytotoxic form (Siciliano and Germida 1998; Macek et al. 2000). In particular, plants with deep root, fibrous roots having faster growth rate, such as grasses, are useful in phytoremediation. The property of plants to tolerate stress conditions is another important required characteristic (Siciliano and Germida 1998).
Cunningham et al. (1995) showed accelerated petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in rhizosphere region compared to bulk soil. Several studies report on the use of gramineae, e.g., prairie grasses, in the phytoremediation of hazardous organic compounds. Miya and Firestone (2000) observed greater percentages of phenanthrene degrading bacteria in rhizosphere soil than bulk soils and suggested the rhizosphere selected for PAH degraders. Merkl et al. (2005a) showed that some tropical grasses and legumes to be resistant to petroleum pollution and root surface were increased in graminoids, namely Brachiaria brizantha, Cyperus aggregatus, and Eleusine indica in petroleum-polluted soils.
Apart from bioaugmentation with oil-degrading microorganisms, phytoremediation is applied to provide long-term rehabilitation of the residual oil contamination (Panchenko et al. 2002). The successful application of plant species to the bioremediated sites having oil-contaminated soil has been shown in a number of studies (Günther et al. 1996; Carmen et al. 1998; Pichtel and Liskanen 2001; Banks et al. 2003; Jones et al. 2004; White et al. 2006; Kaimi et al. 2006; Brandt et al. 2006; Muratova et al. 2008; Al-Surrayai et al. 2009; Ayotamuno et al. 2010). Several comprehensive reviews are available (Frick et al. 1999; Hutchinson et al. 2003; Hall et al. 2011) on this subject. In general, the selection of phytoremediation for specific sites is empirical and based on preliminary results from pot experiments (Kirkpatrick et al. 2006; Liste and Prutz 2006; Euliss et al. 2007). Most studies on the phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soil reported the use of grasses (Poaceae) and legumes (Leguminosae; Aprill and Sims 1990; Günther et al. 1996; Qiu et al. 1997; Merkl et al. 2005b; Kirkpatrick et al. 2006; Schwab et al. 2006; Kaimi et al. 2006; Kechavarzi et al. 2007). In the phytoremediation of organics which is based on a stimulated microbial degradation in the rhizosphere, fertilization is very much essential. Adequate fertilizer applications may reduce competition between plants and microorganisms for limited nutrients in oil-polluted soil, resulting in enhanced petroleum hydrocarbon (PHC) degradation rates (Hutchinson et al. 2001).
There are no reports available on the use of Cyperus rotundus for phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. In general, phytoremediation must be managed by using indigenous plants, especially those growing in the contaminated sites, instead of foreign or genetically modified species (Lopez-Martinez et al. (2008). Prior to phytoremediation field trials a plant should be evaluated for its suitability in the laboratories and greenhouses. Cyperus brevifolius is a commonly distributed species of North East India and also found growing in oil-contaminated areas. It is a species that propagates by rhizome and seeds, grow in wet, disturbed, and altered areas thus, it could be vegetatively established in contaminated soil. It has fibrous, perennial root system with vigorous deep root rhizomes which can control soil erosion and surface spreading of hydrocarbon contaminants. Considering this, it was selected to evaluate its suitability for use in the phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. The overall goal of this experiment was to evaluate the suitability of C. rotundus for use in the phytoremediation of crude oil-contaminated soils in Assam, India. The particular objectives were to study the influence of oil on plant growth, the effect of plants on oil degradation, and the influence of fertilizer on plant growth and oil degradation.
2 Materials and Methods
2.1 Soil, Crude Oil, and Chemicals
The soil used in the contaminated pots (Table 1) was collected from the oil-contaminated pit of Oil India Limited, Duliajan (27°20′29″ N 90°28.57′92″ E), Assam, India containing crude oil concentration of 4% w/w. Crude oil (average organic composition: 27.5% saturated, 43.4% aromatics, 1.8% asphaltenes, and 27.3% resins) was obtained from Research and Development Department, Oil India Limited, Duliajan, Assam (India). The chemicals were purchased from Merck.
2.2 Experimental Setup
The experiment was conducted in a net house of IASST, Assam, India. The experimental site is located Northern Latitude 26°10′45″ Eastern Longitude 91°45′ Climate with a mean annual rainfall of 1,600 mm, mean relative humidity of 76.6%, and minimum temperature of 6°C and maximum temperature of 38°C. (http://kamrup.nic.in/ghy.html).
2.3 Preparation of Soil
The soil was air-dried and sieved through a 2-mm screen. The soil for PHC-contaminated treatments was mixed by hand with crude oil to the concentration of 80,000 mg kg−1 of dry soil weight. Continuous checking was done to ensure the uniformity of crude oil in soil during mixing. The uncontaminated soil, with similar pedologic characteristic of the contaminated one, was used as control. The physicochemical characteristics are reported in Table 1. The crude oil-contaminated soil was allowed to stand for 6 weeks to allow for partial aging of the contamination and adsorption of oil to the soil particles. Plastic pots were filled (approximately 15 kg per pot) using contaminated or uncontaminated soil.
2.4 Preparation of Plant
C. brevifolius was used for phytoremediation study. It is a ubiquitous plant growing wild and widely distributed throughout North-Eastern India. Five transplants were planted in each pot after soil contamination with crude oil. Prior to this, the plants were propagated in the net house. A total of 90 pots were maintained in a half open net house without environmental control. The mean monthly temperatures were 22–25°C (from a daily minimum average of 19°C to maximum 38°C). The mean monthly relative humidity was 71–76.6% (from a daily minimum average of 35% to maximum 98%). The daily photoperiod was characterized by 12 h of daylight with low variation during the experimental period. The pots were watered twice per day, and on sunny days when the rate of evapotranspiration is very high, they were sprinkled on the top. Replacement of plants with healthy transplants was done in case of plants died in 10 days. During replacement, soil particles adhering to the roots were carefully collected to prevent release of the contaminated soil. Starting from the date of transplant, the experiment lasted 360 days om7th May 2010 to 7th May 2011). Analysis was done for hydrocarbon degradation in different treatments.
2.5 Treatment Details
TA: contaminated soil + fertilizer + plants, TB: contaminated soil + fertilizer + no plants, TC: contaminated soil + without fertilizer + plants, TD: contaminated soil + without fertilizer + no plants, TE: uncontaminated soil + fertilizer + plants.
2.6 Fertilization
Basic dose of fertilizer [nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) 120, 60, and 60 mg kg−1 soil] was applied to TA, TB, and TE, respectively to support healthy plant growth. TC and TE were maintained without fertilizer amendment. The total fertilizer amounts were split in to six applications (8, 30, 75, 115, 180, and 280 days after planting).
2.7 Evaluation and Sampling
Initial soil samples were taken before planting. Weekly monitoring of plant was done during the experimental period to ensure healthy plant growth. Three destructive samplings were carried out by using 5 pots per treatment at 60-day interval (up to 360 days). Plants were cut at their base and the length of shoot was determined. Roots were carefully separated from soil; both roots and shoots were rinsed and stored at 50% isopropyl alcohol under refrigeration (4°C). Both shoots and roots were oven dried at 65°C until constant weight and dry-weight of biomass was determined. The specific root length, root diameter, and root surface area were analyzed with WinRhizo 2008a, Régent Instruments Inc., for determination of root diameter classes (x < 2 mm (fine roots) and x > 2 mm). The soil of each pot was homogenized and one 500-g composite soil was stored at 4°C for 1–2 weeks prior to analysis.
2.8 Analytical Methods
The pH in soil was measured in 1:2.5 soil/DH2O suspension using a pH meter (Elico LI-127) fitted with a glass electrode (Thomas and Sparks 1996). Total organic carbon in soil was determined by oxidation with potassium dichromate (K2Cr2O7) and titration of excess dichromate with ammonium ferrous sulphate [(NH4)2Fe(SO4)2·6H2O] (Kalembasa and Jenkinson 1973). Total nitrogen in soil was measured by the Kjeldahl method using concentrated H2SO4, K2SO4, and HgO to digest the sample (Bremner and Sparks 1996), soil particle distribution by the hydrometer method as described by Gee et al. (1986). Soil moisture content was measured by gravimetric method (oven drying until constant weight). Bacterial counts were determined by using plate count agar (Alexander et al. 2005).
2.9 Total Oil and Grease Analysis in Soil
Total oil and grease (TOG) in soil was determined by Soxhlet extraction method using a modification of EPA method 3540B (USEPA 1994). Of each sample, three 20 g replicates were analyzed. The samples were acidified with HCL to pH 2 and dehydrated with MgSO4. Soxhlet extraction with dichloromethane was run for 10 h. After passing the extract through a filter paper (Whatman No.4) with approximately 1 g Na2SO4, the solvent was evaporated and constant weight of the dry extract determined. Percentage of TOG was calculated based on soil dry weight.
2.10 Statistical Analysis
The statistical analyses were conducted using the Superior Performance Software System 15.0 for Windows. Concentration of TOG in soil, plant dry weight, root, and shoot length was subjected to one way analysis of variance to test for significant difference between treatments (p < 0.05). Moreover, the bivariate correlation between TOG in soil, plant dry weight, root, and shoot length in the contaminated treatments with plants was evaluated with Pearson’s correlation-coefficient for normal-distributed variables at p = 0.05.
3 Results
3.1 Physicochemical Characteristics
Tables 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 represent the selected properties of soil used in the experiment. The contaminated and uncontaminated soil used in the experiment was acidic. The pH range in the contaminated soil in vegetated pots during the study period was 4.5 to 6 and that of unvegetated pots was 4.4 to 5.1. Moreover, the pH intervals recorded in uncontaminated soil were 4.2 to 5.4. The texture of soil was sandy-loam. The moisture content of contaminated soil was 5.6% to 20.5% while that of uncontaminated soil was 11% to 25.6% during the course of study. It has been observed that moisture content of TA and TC at 180 and 360 days was about 5% to 13% higher than that in TB and TD. The uncontaminated soil had higher moisture content (25.6%) during 360 days. Petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) usually have a very high carbon–nitrogen ratio. After mixing crude oil, the soil had a C/N ratio of 670:1 in TA and TB and 550:1 in TC and TD, respectively. During 360 days, C/N ratio was 110:1 in TA and 120:1 in TC and that of TB and TD was 590:1 and 440:1, respectively. In 360 days, the total nitrogen increased from 0.14% to 0.25% in TA and 0.1% to 0.2% in TC while that in TB it increased from 0.14% to 0.18% and in TD it increased from 0.1% to 0.12%.
3.2 Plant Height and Biomass
Experimental transplants had an initial height of about 6 cm. Height of tillers in the contaminated soil was slower and shorter than in uncontaminated soil (Fig. 1). Significant difference of plant height (p = 0.05) was observed between contaminated and uncontaminated soil throughout the experimental period. The biomass yield per pot increased in all the pots during the experimental period (Fig. 2). There was significant difference of biomass yield (p = 0.05) between the contaminated and uncontaminated soil during the course of the study. Concerning fertilizer effects in contaminated treatments, no significant difference of plant height and biomass was observed between the fertilized and unfertilizer soil throughout the study.
3.3 Root Structure
The difference between the root structure of contaminated and uncontaminated soil was significant (p = 0.05) during the study period. Roots growing in uncontaminated soil were finer and longer than that of contaminated soil. The average specific root length (cm g−1) of C. brevifolius was 1350.5 in TA, 980.7 in TC in comparison to 2420.4 in TE. The average dry weight of root was 53.5 and 32.7 g in TA and TB respectively whereas, that of TE is 98.5 g during the study of 360 days. Similarly, 64% of root surface in fertilized (TA) and 58% in unfertilized (TC) on contaminated soil belonged to fine roots in comparison to 96% in uncontaminated soil (TE).
3.4 Microbial Population
The bacterial population increased with time. The initial counts went from 5.3 × 106 cfu/g in contaminated soil and 6.2 × 106 cfu/g. In 180 days, the bacterial colony counts increased to 31.5 × 106 in TA, 8.65 × 106 in TB, 26.8 × 106 in TC, 8.3 × 106 in TD, and 36.5 × 106 in TE, respectively. The final count bacterial population at 360 days increased to 35.2 × 106 in TA, 9.6 × 106 in TB, 32.4 × 106 in TC, 9.2 × 106 in TD, and 38.5 × 106 in TE. There was significant difference of bacterial colony count between vegetated and unvegetated pots. Concerning fertilizer effect, no significant influence of fertilizer was observed on bacterial population.
3.5 Concentration of TOG in Soil
The soil in the contaminated treatments had 8% TOG content of the total soil dry weight. There was significant difference of TOG degradation between the vegetated and unvegetated pots (Fig. 3). Reduction of TOG in vegetated soil was rapid during the first 60 days in the presence of C. brevifolius (TA 31.2%; TC 15%). The unvegetated soil showed slight decrease during 60 days (TB 5%; TD 3.7%). TOG degradation became relatively slower and stable in vegetated treatments during 240 days (TA 78.7%; TC 57.5%) and became almost stable during 300 (TA 83.7%; TC 60%) to 360 days (TA 86.2%; TC 61.2%). In the unvegetated treatments, TOG reduction was very slow and became almost stable in 60 days. Significant difference (p = 0.05) of TOG degradation was observed between fertilized soil and unfertilized soil in the presence of C. brevifolius. In case of fertilized soil (TA), TOG degradation was relatively faster, continued sharp reduction until day 240, continued to be slow, and became almost stable at day 360. In unfertilized soil (TC), TOG reduction was comparatively slower than the fertilized soil and continued to be stable at day 180. The bivariate correlation (r) between TOG degradation and root biomass in TA and TC was significant (p = 0.05).
4 Discussion
The pH of vegetated soil was more than in unvegetated soil during the study period. Plants provide root exudates of carbon, energy, nutrients, enzymes, and sometimes oxygen to microbial population in the rhizosphere (Campbell 1985; Cunningham et al. 1996; Vance 1996). These exudates provide sufficient carbon and energy to support large number of microbes in the rhizosphere (Erickson et al. 1995). This plant-induced enhancement of the microbial population is called rhizosphere effect (Atlas and Bartha 1998) and is believed to result in enhanced degradation of PHC contaminants in the rhizosphere. With sufficient oxygen, soil moisture, and an acclimated population of microorganisms, the soil column acts as a natural biofilter within which PHC vapors are degraded at sufficient fast rates (USEPA 2011). This dissipation of PHCs might have increased moisture content in soil. Increase in N level and bacterial utilization of PHCs might have declined the C/N ratio. The decrease in total organic carbon in the vegetated pot might be due to utilization of hydrocarbon by plants and microbes. As an additional compartment, plant roots can interact with both microbes and organic pollutants (Bossert and Bartha 1984). Root proliferation of the plant can support a flourishing microbial consortium, thus accelerating biodegradation of PHCs (Cai et al. 2010). In turn, the healthier microbial consortium can benefit better growth of the plant, thus improving phytoremediation efficiency and characteristic of soil. However, due to the complexity of rhizosphere, more information about relationships between C. brevifolius root–microbial interactions in respect to TOG degradation needs to be further extracted.
Several studies have shown that crude oil has an inhibiting effect on plant and root growth (Wiltse et al. 1998; Brandt et al. 2006). Brandt et al. (2006) observed 50% decrease in total biomass and 40% decrease in plant height in 5% crude oil-contaminated soil compared to uncontaminated soil in 6 month old Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash. In the study reported here, the same phenomenon was found for C. brevifolius. The average yields were significantly lower in contaminated soil than in uncontaminated soil (p = 0.05). In the crude oil-contaminated soil, average reduction of plant height and biomass during 360 days was TA 27.9% and 46.3% and TC 31.5% and 56.5%, respectively compared to uncontaminated soil, regardless of the fertilizer in the contaminated soil compensating for the higher C/N ratio. High rates of plant mortality and reduction in height and biomass are typical reactions caused by oil contamination (Lin and Mendelssohn 1998). The root structure of C. brevifolius was reduced by the toxicity of crude oil. This plant is herbaceous with extensive fibrous root system, can multiply both vegetatively as well as sexually. Despite these characteristics, growth of plant was inhibited by addition of crude oil during the initial stage of growth. After 60 days, the species showed adaptability to the toxic environment, as shown by the high rates of tillering and biomass production. However, there are reports on large differences of PHC tolerance among plants growing in contaminated soil. For instance, Radwan et al. (1998) reported that Fava bean (Vicia fava L.) could tolerate up to 10% (w/w); Brandt et al. (2006) observed 5% (w/w) crude oil tolerance of vetiver grass (V. zizanioides (L.) Nash). In the present study, C. brevifolius could tolerate 8% TOG concentration.
The concentration of oil dropped sharply in the vegetated soil than in unvegetated soil during the course of experiment. Despite inhibition of plant growth and root development, the decrease of crude oil in vegetated soil was significantly more than in unvegetated soil. Merkl et al. (2005a) and Merkl et al. (2005b) showed enhanced degradation of crude oil under the influence of a tropical grass after only a few months, Muratova et al. (2008) showed total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) reduction up to 52% during 3 years of rye cultivation. Diab (2008) recorded 30%, 16.8%, and 13.8% reduction of TPH in rhizosphere soil of broad bean, corn and wheat respectively. In addition, Peng et al. (2009) noted 41.61–63.2% removal of TPH by Mirabilis jalapa. In the present study, C. brevifolius could decrease significant amount of TOG (TA 86.2%; TC 61.2%) in comparison to uncontaminated soil (TB 13.7%; TD 12.5%) during 360 days (Fig. 3). In the same experiment system conducted, Axonupus compressus (SW.) P. Beauv. decreased 70% of TPH in the fertilized soil compared to 40% in unfertilized one in 60,000 mg kg−1 crude oil-contaminated soil during the study of 360 days (Bordoloi et al. 2012). Furthermore, the degradation of TPH by Cyperus odoratus (78%) and Cyperus laevigatus (73%) in the fertilized soil was significantly more than that in unfertilized one (C. odoratus 45%; C. laevigatus 43%) during the study of 360 days in 80,000 mg kg−1 crude oil-contaminated soil (Basumatary et al. 2012). In the present study, the degradation might be due capability of plant to tolerate and degrade crude oil. Lopez-Martinez et al. (2008) also found significant reduction of TPH by Cyperus laxus Lam. in 24 months when plants were cultivated on hydrocarbon-contaminated soil and spiked perlite. The slower and less degradation of TOG in unvegetated soil can be attributed to its lack of plants. Volatilization of lighter fractions of crude oil might have contributed to the rapid degradation. In addition, microbial degradation might have also contributed to reduction in crude oil in soil. Both these action constitute part of the natural attenuation phenomenon (Margesin and Schinner 2001; Pichtel and Liskanen 2001; Bento et al. 2005; Chaîneau et al. 2005; Sarkar et al. 2005; Scow and Hicks 2005; Atagana 2010). The slow rate of removal after day 60 might be due to removal of volatile components and the remaining components of the crude oil required intervention to be removed from the soil. A comparison of TOG removal in the vegetated treatments (TA 86.2% and TC 61.2%) and unvegetated treatments (TB 13.7% and TD 12.5%) clearly showed that phytoremediation by C. brevifolius was responsible for removal of more than 72.5% (TA) and 48.7% (TC) of the oil (Fig. 3). However, the removal of TOG in vegetated treatments was significantly higher than the unvegetated treatments during the study of 360 days. Further decrease of TOG was not observed after 360 days of plant growth. In the present study, removal of TOG in vegetated treatments is believed to be due to the interaction of rhizosphere microorganisms and plants which is similar to the findings of Liste and Prutz (2006), Ho et al. (2007), and Muratova et al. (2008). As roots grow, they penetrate through the soil, exposing entrapped contaminants that have been previously inaccessible, increasing their availability to degradation (Fava et al. 2004; Bogan and Sullivan 2003).
Fertilizers increase plant growth in oil-polluted soils in the case of nutrient deficiency (Lin and Mendelssohn 1998; Hutchinson et al. 2001). However, over fertilizing usually leads to yield depressions (Brandt et al. 2006). In our study, there was significant difference of plant growth between the fertilized and unfertilized soil during the first 60 days but the differences diminished towards the end of the experiment. Concerning oil degradation, there was significant influence of fertilizer application during the experiment. However, the fertilized soil could show significant amount of TOG degradation in comparison to unfertilized soil. For the soil used, the unfertilized soil seemed to be insufficient to meet the nutrient demands of plants. The fertilized soil could compensate the nutrient demands of plant for phytoremediation. Hutchinson et al. (2001) also observed better degradation of TPH using grasses with N/P amendments than without inorganic amendments. In addition, Merkl et al. (2005a) found enhanced degradation of crude oil by using B. brizantha in NPK-fertilized soil in comparison to control.
Rhizosphere microbial populations may enhance a plant’s adaptation to petroleum hydrocarbons by detoxifying contaminated soils through direct mineralization of these organic contaminants (Siciliano and Germida 1998; Jeffries et al. 2003; Barea et al. 2005). In the present study, the bacterial population was found to be 6 times in vegetated pots during the study of 360 days. Sabaté et al. (2004) also found similar levels of soil bacteria in hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Ghazali et al. (2004) reported a tenfold increase in soil microorganisms. In the unvegetated pots, no significant increase of bacterial population was observed in this study. The increase in bacterial population in the vegetated pots might have positive impact on degradation of TOG. The increased microbial numbers are primarily due to the presence of plant exudates and sloughed tissue, which serve as sources of energy, carbon, nitrogen, or growth factors (Lee and Banks 1993; Banks et al. 2003). Huang et al. (2004) reported on the enhanced phytoremediation of organic contaminants using grass species inoculated with a mixture of beneficial bacteria such as Pseudomonas putida, Azospirillum brasilense, and Enterobacter cloaceae. Microorganisms have a strong influence on the health conditions of plants. In our work, a plant promoted degradation of hydrocarbon may be due to the complexity of plant–microorganism interactions.
5 Conclusions
This study has shown the suitability of C. brevifolius in phytoremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil. Though this plant showed reduced plant height, biomass and root growth in the contaminated soil, the results are significant in terms of degradation. The average degradation percentage of PHC by C. brevifolius (86.2%) is comparatively more than the degradation percentage of A. compressus (70%), C. odoratus (78%), and C. laevigatus (73%) during the study of 360 days. However, C. brevifolius showed superiority in the degradation of PHC in the crude oil-contaminated soil. This study suggests that cultivation of C. brevifolius on oil-polluted sites in Assam, India is considered to be useful. It is a green technology, also provides erosion control and, thus, prevents contaminants from surface spreading. Moreover, if planted on up to 80,000 mg kg−1 crude oil-contaminated soil, it could polish crude oil contaminants.
References
Alexander, D. B., Sylvia, D. M., Hartel, P. G., Fuhrmann, J. J., & Zuberer, D. A. (Eds.). (2005). Bacteria and archae. Principles and applications of soil microbiology (pp. 101–139). Upper saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Al-Surrayai, T., Yateem, A., Al-Kandari, R., Al-Sharrah, T., & Bin-haji, A. (2009). The use of Conocarpus lancifolius trees for the remediation of oil-contaminated soil. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 18, 354–368.
Aprill, W., & Sims, R. C. (1990). Evaluation of the use of prairie grasses for stimulating polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon treatment in soil. Chemosphere, 20, 253–265.
Atagana, H. I. (2010). Bioremediation of co-contamination of crude oil and heavy metals in soil by phytoremediation using Chromolaena odorata (L) King & H.E. Robinson. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 215(1–4), 261–271.
Atlas, R. M., & Bartha, R. (1998). Microbial ecology: fundamentals and applications. Don Mills: Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company, Inc.
Ayotamuno, J. M., Kogbara, R. B., Agele, E. A., & Agoro, O. S. (2010). Composting and phytoremediation treatment of petroleum sludge. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 19, 686–695.
Banks, M. K., Schwab, P., Liu, B., Kulakow, P. A., Smith, J. S., & Kim, R. (2003). The effect of plants on the degradation and toxicity of petroleum contaminants in soil: a field assessment. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 78, 75–96.
Barea, J. M., Pozo, M. J., Azcon, R., & Azcon-Aguilar, C. (2005). Microbial cooperation in the rhizosphere. Journal of Experimental Botany, 56, 1761–1778.
Basumatary, B., Saikia, R., Bordoloi, S., Das, H. C., & Sarma H. P. (2012). Assessment of potential plant species for phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated areas of Upper Assam, India. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotehnology (Bioremediation special issue) (Accepted).
Bento, F. M., Flavio, A., Camargo, O., Okeke, B. C., & Frankenberger, W. T. (2005). Comparative bioremediation of soils contaminated with diesel oil by natural attenuation, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Bioresource Technology, 96, 1049–1055.
Bogan, B. W., & Sullivan, W. R. (2003). Physicochemical soil parameters affecting sequestration and mycobacterial biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil. Chemosphere, 52, 1717–1726.
Bordoloi, S., Basumatary, B., Saikia, R., & Das, H. C. (2012). Axonopus compressus (SW.) P. Beauv. a native grass species for phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soil in Assam, India. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotehnology. (Bioremediation special issue) (Accepted).
Bossert, I., & Bartha, R. (1984). The fate of petroleum in soil ecosystems. In R. M. Atlas (Ed.), Petroleum Microbiology (pp. 435–474). New York: Macmillan.
Brandt, R., Merkl, N., Schultze-Kraft, R., Infante, C., & Broll, G. (2006). Potential of Vetiver (Vetiveria zizanioides (L.) Nash. for phytoremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils in Venezuela. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 8, 273–284.
Bremner, J. M., & Sparks, D. L. (ed) (1996). Total nitrogen. Methods of Soil Analysis Chemical Methods Part 3, 1085–1122. Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.
Cai, Z., Zhou, Q., Peng, S., & Li, K. (2010). Promoted biodegradation and microbiological effects of petroleum hydrocarbons by Impatiens balsamina L. with strong endurance. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 183, 731–737.
Campbell, R. (1985). Plant Microbiology. Baltimore: Edward Arnold.
Carmen, E. P., Crossman, T. L., & Gatiff, E. G. (1998). Phytoremediation of no. 2 fuel oil-contaminated soil. Journal of Soil Contamination, 7, 455–466.
Chaîneau, C. H., Rougeux, G., Yepremian, C., & Oudot, J. (2005). Effects of nutrient concentration on the biodegradation of crude oil and associated microbial populations in the soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 1490–1497.
Cunningham, S. D., Berti, W. R., & Huang, J. W. (1995). Phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Trends in Biotechnology, 13, 393–397.
Cunningham, S. D., Anderson, T. A., Schwab, P. A., & Hsu, F. C. (1996). Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Advances in Agronomy, 56, 44–144.
Diab, I. A. (2008). Phytoremediation of oil contaminated desert soil using the rhizophere effects of some plants. Research Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, 4, 604–610.
Erickson, L. E., Davis, L. C., & Muralidharan, N. (1995). Bioenergetics and bioremediation of contaminated soil. Thermochimica Acta, 250, 353–358.
Euliss, K., Ho, C., Schwab, A. P., Rock, S., & Banks, K. (2007). Greenhouse and field assessment of phytoremediation for petroleum contaminants in a riparian zone. Bioresource Technology, 99, 1961–1971.
Fava, F., Berselli, S., Conte, P., Picollo, A., & Marchetti, L. (2004). Effects of humic substances and soya lecithin on the aerobic Bioremediation of a soil historically contaminated by PAHs. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 88, 214–223.
Frick, C. M., Farrell, R. E., & Germida, J. J. (1999). Assessment of phytoremediation as an in-situ technique for cleaning oil-contaminated sites (p. 82). Saskatoon: Calgary, AB, Canada, Petroleum-Technology Alliance Canada (PTAC), University of Saskatchewan.
Gee, G. W., Bauder, J. W., & Klute, A. (Eds.). (1986). Particle size analysis. Methods of soil analysis, part I physical and mineralogical methods (2nd ed., pp. 383–411). Madison: Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy.
Ghazali, F. M., Rahman, R. N. Z. A., Salleh, A. B., & Basri, M. (2004). Biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil by microbial consortium. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 54, 61–67.
Günther, T., Dornberger, U., & Fritsche, W. (1996). Effects of ryegrass on biodegradation of hydrocarbons in soil. Chemosphere, 33, 203–215.
Hall, J., Soole, K., & Bentham, R. (2011). Hydrocarbon phytoremediation in the family Fabaceae—a review. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 13, 317–332.
Ho, C. H., Applegate, B., & Banks, M. K. (2007). Impact of microbial/plant interactions on the transformation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in rhizosphere of Festuca arundinaceae. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 9(2), 107–114.
Huang, X. D., Al-Alawi, Y., Penrose, D. M., Glick, B. R., & Greenberg, B. N. (2004). Responses of grass species to creosote during phytoremediation. Environmental Pollution, 130, 453–463.
Hutchinson, S. L., Banks, M. K., & Schwab, A. P. (2001). Phytoremediation of aged petroleum sludge: effect of inorganic fertilizer. Journal of Environmental Quality, 30, 395–403.
Hutchinson, S. L., Schwab, A. P., & Banks, M. K. (2003). Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in the rhizosphere. In S. McCutcheon & J. L. Schnoor (Eds.), Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants (pp. 355–386). Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience.
Jeffries, P., Gianinazzi, S., Perotto, S., Turnau, K., & Barea, J. M. (2003). The contribution of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in sustainable maintenance of plant health and soil fertility. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 37, 1–16.
Jones, R. K., Sun, W. H., Tang, C. S., & Robert, F. M. (2004). Phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in tropical coastal soils II. Microbial response to plant root and contaminant. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 11, 340–346.
Kaimi, E., Mukaidani, T., Miyoshi, S., & Tamaki, M. (2006). Ryegrass enhancement of biodegradation in diesel-contaminated soil. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 55, 110–119.
Kalembasa, S. J., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1973). A comparative study of titrimetric and gravimetric methods for the determination of organic carbon in soil. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 24, 1085–1090.
Kechavarzi, C., Petterson, K., Leeds-Harrison, P., Ritchie, L., & Ledin, S. (2007). Root establishment of perennial ryegrass (L. perenne) in diesel-contaminated subsurface soil layers. Environmental Pollution, 145, 68–74.
Kirkpatrick, W. D., White, P. M., Jr., Wolf, D. C., Thoma, G. L., & Reynolds, C. M. (2006). Selecting plants and nitrogen rates to vegetate crude-oil-contaminated soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 8, 285–297.
Lee, E., & Banks, M. K. (1993). Bioremediation of petroleum contaminated soil using vegetation: a microbial study. Environmental Science & Health, 28, 2187–2198.
Lin, Q., & Mendelssohn, I. A. (1998). The combined effects of phytoremediation and biostimulation in enhancing habitat restoration and oil degradation of petroleum contaminated wetlands. Ecological Engineering, 10, 263–274.
Liste, H. H., & Prutz, I. (2006). Plant performance, dioxygenase-expressing rhizosphere bacteria, and biodegradation of weathered hydrocarbons in contaminated soil. Chemosphere, 62, 1411–1420.
Lopez-Martinez, S., Gallegos-Martinez, M. E., Perez-Flores, L. J., & Gutierrez-Rojas, M. (2008). Contaminated soil phytoremediation by Cyperus laxus Lam. Cytochrome P450 erod-activity induced by hydrocarbons in roots. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 10(4), 289–301.
Macek, T., Mackona, M., & Kas, J. (2000). Research review paper: exploration of plants for removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnology Advances, 18, 23–24.
Margesin, R., & Schinner, F. (2001). Bioremediation (natural attenuation and biostimulation) of diesel-oil-contaminated soil in an Alpine glacier skiing area. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 67(7), 3127–3133.
Merkl, N., Schultze-Kraft, R., & Arias, M. (2005). Influence of fertilizer levels on phytoremediation of crude oil with the tropical pasture grass Brachiaria brizantha (Hochst. ex A. Rich.) Stapf. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 7, 217–230.
Merkl, N., Schultze-Kraft, R., & Infante, C. (2005). Assessment of tropical grasses and legumes for phytoremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 165(1–4), 195–209.
Miya, R. K., & Firestone, M. K. (2000). Phenanthrene-degrader community dynamics in rhizosphere soil from a common annual grass. Journal of Environmental Quality, 29, 584–592.
Muratova, A. Yu., Dmitrieva, T. V., Panchenko, L. V., & Turkovskaya, O. V. (2008). Phytoremediation of oil-sludge contaminated soil. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 10, 486–502.
Panchenko, L., Turkovskaya, O., Volkov, M., Muratova, A., Dubrovskaya, Y., Pleshakova, Y., & Pozdnyakova, N. (2002). Large-scale in situ bioremediation of oil-sludge. In J. Hupka (Ed.), Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Oil Pollution: Prevention, Characterization, Clean Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 9–16). Gdańsk-Wrzeszez: Gdansk University of Technology.
Peng, S. W., Zhou, Q. X., Zhang, H., & Shi, R. G. (2009). Responses of seed germination of 8 ornamental plants to petroleum contamination. Chinese Journal of Environmental Science, 29, 786–790.
Pichtel, J., & Liskanen, P. (2001). Degradation of diesel fuel in rhizosphere soil. Environmental Engineering Science, 18, 145–157.
Qiu, X., Leland, T. W., Shah, S. I., Sorensen, D. L., & Kendall, E. W. (1997). Field study: grass remediation for clay soil contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In E. L. Kruger, T. A. Anderson, & J. R. Coats (Eds.), Phytoremediation of soil and water contaminants, ACS Symposium Series (Vol. 664, pp. 186–199). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.
Radwan, S. S., Al-Awadhi, H., Sorkhoh, N. A., & El-Nemr, I. M. (1998). Rhizospheric hydrocarbon-utilizing microorganisms as potential contributors to phytoremediation for the oily Kuwaiti desert. Microbiological Research, 153, 247–251.
Sabaté, J., Vinas, M., & Solanas, A. M. (2004). Laboratory-scale bioremediation experiments on hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 54, 19–25.
Sarkar, D., Ferguson, M., Datta, R., & Bimbaum, S. (2005). Bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated soils: comparison of biosolids addition, carbon supplementation, and monitored natural attenuation. Environmental Pollution, 136, 187–195.
Schwab, P., Banks, M. K., & Kyle, W. A. (2006). Heritability of phytoremediation potential for the alfalfa cultivar Riley in petroleum contaminated soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 177, 239–249.
Scow, K. M., & Hicks, K. A. (2005). Natural attenuation and enhanced bioremediation of organic contaminants in groundwater. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 16, 246–253.
Siciliano, S. D., & Germida, J. J. (1998). Mechanisms of phytoremediation: biochemical and ecological interactions between plants and bacteria. Environmental Reviews, 6, 65–79.
Thomas, G. W., & Sparks, D. L. (1996). Soil pH and soil acidity. Methods of soil analysis chemical methods part 3. Chemical methods (pp. 475–490). Madison: Soil Science Society of America Inc., American Society of Agronomy.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (1994). Test methods for evaluating solid and hazardous waste. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). (2011). Petroleum hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydrocarbons differ in their potential for vapor intrusion (p. 20460). Washington, D.C: Office of Underground Storage Tanks.
Vance, D. B. (1996). Phytoremediation: enhancing natural attunation processes. National Environmental Journal, 6, 30–31.
White, P. M., Jr., Wolf, D. C., Thomas, G. J., & Reynolds, C. M. (2006). Phytoremediation of alkylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in a crude oil-contaminated soil. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 169, 207–220.
Wiltse, C. C., Rooney, W. L., Chen, Z., Schwab, A. P., & Banks, M. K. (1998). Greenhouse evaluation of agronomic and crude oil-phytoremediation potential among alfalfa genotypes. Journal of Environmental Quality, 27, 169–173.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Director, IASST, for providing necessary facilities to carry out this work. This work was supported by a grant from the Oil India Limited, Duliajan, Assam (India).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basumatary, B., Bordoloi, S. & Sarma, H.P. Crude Oil-Contaminated Soil Phytoremediation by Using Cyperus brevifolius (Rottb.) Hassk. Water Air Soil Pollut 223, 3373–3383 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1116-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-012-1116-6