Abstract
The treatment of domestic wastewater at a temperature of 12–24°C was investigated in an RBC system. The RBC consists of a two stage system connected in series. The system was operated at different organic loading rates (OLR's) and hydraulic retntion times (HRT's) in order to optimize the RBC performance. The overall removal efficiencies for chemical oxygen demand (CODtotal, CODsuspended and CODcolloidal) significantly decreased when decreasing the total HRT from 10 to 2.5 h and increasing the OLR from 11 to 47 g COD/m2.d. However, the effluent quality of CODsoluble remained unaffected. Most of the COD was removed in the 1st stage and nitrification took place in the 2nd stage of the two stage system.The overall nitrification efficiency was 49% at total OLR of 11 gCOD/m2.d. At total HRT's of 10, 5 and 2.5 h, the Escherchia coli (E. coli) concentration was reduced by a value of 1.6, 1.5 and 0.8 log10 respectively. The sludge volume index (SVI) decreased as the OLR increased. However, the SVI of the excess sludge produced in the RBC under different OLR's was always <74 ml/gTS, which indicates vadjust a good settleability. The performance of the single versus two stage RBC operated at the same total OLR of 22 g COD/m2.d and the same HRT of 5.0 h was examined. The results obtained showed that the COD concentration and the E. coli content in the final effluent of a two stage were lower than in the effluent of the single stage RBC. Moreover, the nitrification efficiency in the two stage system was higher comapred to one stage system.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Akunna, J.C., &Jefferies, C. (2000). Performance of family sizesequencing batch reactor and rotating biological contactor units treating sewage atvarious operating conditions. Water Science and Technology, 41(1),97–104.
APHA (1998). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water andWastewater (20th ed). Washington, D.C: American Public Health Association.
Ayoub, G.M., &Saikaly, P. (2004). The combined effect of step—feed and recycling on RBC performance. Water Research, 38, 3009–3016.
Boller, M., Eugster, I., Weber, A., &Gujer, W. (1987). Nitrifikationin nachgeschalteten rotierenden tauchkorpern. EAWAG-report.
Boongorsrang, A., Suga, K., &Maeda, Y. (1982). Nitrification ofwastewaters containing carbon and inorganic nitrogen by rotating disc contactor.Journal of Fermentation Technology, 60, 357–362.
Cheung, P.S. (1986). The performance of the rotating disc system underthe tropical conditions in Taiwan. Water Science and Technology 18, 177–183.
Dutch Standard Normalized Methods (1969). The Netherlands NormalisationInstitute, Delft, The Netherlands.
El-zanfaly, H., &El-abagy, M. (1987). Removal of bacterial indices ofpollution during sewage treatment via rotating biological contactor. AppliedMicrobiology and Biotechnology, 25, 585–589.
Gilbert, W.G., Wheeler, J.F., &MacGregor, A. (1986). Energy usageof rotating biological contactor facilities. Journal Water Pollution ControlFederation, 58, 47–51.
Gonenc, I.E., &Harremoes, P. (1985). Nitrification in rotating discsystems: Criteria for transition from oxygen to ammonia rate limitation. WaterResearch, 19, 1119–1127.
Griffin, P., &Findlay, G.E. (2000). Process and engineeringimprovements to rotating biological contactor design. Water Science andTechnology, 41(1), 137–144.
Guarino, C.F., Marrazzo, W.J., &Nelson, M.D. (1977). Philadelphiadevelops surfact. Paper presented at 50th annual WPCF conference, Philadelphia, PA;pp.1–7.
Hanaki, K., Wantawin, C., &Ohgaki, S. (1990a). Effects of theactivity of heterotrophs on nitrification in a suspended growth reactor. WaterResearch, 24(3), 289–296.
Hanaki, K., Wantawin, C., &Ohgaki, S. (1990b). Nitrification at lowlevels of dissolved oxygen with and without organic loading in suspended-growthreactors. Water Research, 24(3), 297–302.
Havelaar, A.H., &During, M. (1988). Evaluation of the AndersonBaird — Parker direct plating method for enumerating Escherichia Coli in water.Journal of Applied Bacteriology, 64, 89–98.
Huang, C.S.S. (1986). Nitrification kinetics and its RBCapplications. J. ASCE. Environ. Dn., 108, 473–487.
Janczukowicz, W., &Klimiuk, E. (1992). The influence of the rawwastes dosing system on technological parameters of the rotating biological disc(RBD) process. Bioresource Technology, 42, 241–245.
Jirka, A., &Carter, M.J. (1975). Micro-semi — automated analysisof surface and wastewaters for chemical oxygen demand. Analytical Chemistry,47, 1397–1401.
Kinli, H. (1999). Effect of disc rotating velocity on thenitrification performance of RBC system and biofilm kinetics. EnvironmentalTechnology, 20, 37–43.
Klees, R., &Silverstein, J. (1992). Improved biologicalnitrification using recirculation in rotating biological contactors. WaterScience and Technology, 26(3–4), 545–53.
Loy, T. (1988). Organic and ammonia nitrogen removal suspended solidssettling and sludge stabilization using compact RBC-settling tank system, Ph-DThesis, no. EV-88–15, AIT, Bangkok, Thailand.
Patrick, J.L. (1983). Start-up and operating characteristics of anRBC facility in a cold climate. Journal WPCF, Vol. 55, No. 10.
Rittmann, E., Suzzo, R., &Romero, B.R. (1883). Temperature effectson oxygen transfer to rotating biological contactors. Journal Water PollutionControl Federation, 55, 270–277.
Sagy, M., &Kott, Y. (1990). Efficiency of rotating biologicalcontactor in removing pathogenic bacteria from domestic sewage. WaterResearch, 24(9), 1125–1128.
Snedecor, G.W., &Cochran, W.G. (1980). Statistical methods. TheIowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA.
Surampalli, R.Y., &Baumann, E.R. (1995). Sludge production inrotating biological contactors with supplemental aeration and an enlarged firststage. Bioresource Technol., 54, 297–304.
Surampalli, R.Y., Baumann, E.R. (1997). Role of supplementalaeration in improving overloaded first—stage RBC performance. Water Air SoilPollution, 98, 1–15.
Tawfik, A. (2002a). The biorotor system for post-treatment ofanaerobically treated domestic sewage. Ph-D thesis, Wageningen University &Research Centre, Sub-department of Environmental Technology.
Tawfik, A., Klapwijk, A., El-Gohary, F., &Lettinga, G. (2002b).Treatment of anaerobically pre-treated domestic sewage by a rotating biologicalcontactor. Water Research, 36(1), 147–155.
Tawfik, A., Klapwijk, B., El-Gohary, F., &Lettinga, G. (2002c).Treatment of anaerobically treated domestic wastewater using Rotating BiologicalContactor. Water Science and Technology, (10), 371–376.
Tawfik, A., Klapwijk, B., Van Buuren, J., El-Gohary, F., &Lettinga,G. (2004). Physico-chemical factors affecting the E.coli removal in a rotatingbiological contactor (RBC) treating UASB effluent. Water Research, 38(5), 1081–1088.
Tawfik, A., Zeeman, G., Klapwijk, B., Sanders, W., El-Gohary, F., & Lettinga, G. (2003). treatment of domestic sewage in a combied UASB/RBC system.Process optimization for irrigation purposes. Water Science and Technology, 48(1), 131–138.
Van Buuren (1991). Post-treatment methods for effluent of UASBreactors treating domestic sewage. Internal report no. 91–3, WageningenUniversity, Department of Environmental Technology, The Netherlands.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tawfik, A., Temmink, H., Zeeman, G. et al. Sewage Treatment in a Rotating Biological Contactor (RBC) System. Water Air Soil Pollut 175, 275–289 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9138-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-006-9138-6