Abstract
Water users wish to achieve the highest benefits from water resources. Rules limit the manner in which water users may utilise the water resources occurring within their constituencies or territories. However an asymmetrical situation exists whereby downstream users may not affect upstream users but upstream users do cause downstream impacts. Because of this asymmetry the equitable sharing of water resources between upstream and downstream users will always imply that upstream users have to forego some potential water benefits. The general question that this paper addresses is: which institutional arrangements can be devised to (re-)establish an equilibrium between up- and downstream entities within a catchment area or river basin? The paper addresses this question by first focusing on some local and national water allocation arrangements. After briefly reviewing the different management regimes, customary and colonial, that co-evolved in Southern Africa, it assesses the water management principles that are currently being espoused. The focus then turns to the principles in international water law that deal with the allocation of water in transboundary river basins. It is concluded that it often proves difficult to reach agreement over how to share the scarce resource. The paper then discusses the current trend to look beyond water and beyond the river basin when seeking peaceful means to share a common water resource. The concept of “hydrosolidarity” emerges as a normative value that may help to recreate a balance between the various (asymmetrical) interests that exist within a river basin. The paper concludes that water resources can only be governed wisely is there is capacity to understand and monitor the water fluxes within a river basin. If such capacity is wanting, priority should be given to strengthen it.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Adams WM, Potkanski T, Sutton JEG (1994) Indigenous farmer-managed irrigation in Sonjo, Tanzania. Geogr J 160(1):17–32
Baland J-M, Platteau J-P (1999) The ambiguous impact of inequality on local resource management. World Dev 27(5):773–788
Coward WE Jr (1986) Direct or indirect alternatives for irrigation investment and the creation of property. In: William Easter K (ed) Irrigation investment, technology, and management strategies for development. Studies in water policy and management no. 9. Westview, Boulder, pp 225–244
DWAF (1997) White paper on a national water policy for South Africa. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria
Falkenmark M (1995) Land–water linkages; a synopsis. In: Proceedings of an FAO informal workshop; Rome, 31 January–2 February 1993. FAO Land and Water Bulletin no. 1. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome
Falkenmark M, Folke C (2002) The ethics of socio-ecohydrological catchment management: towards hydrosolidarity. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 6(1):1–9
Falkenmark M, Lundqvist J (1999) Towards upstream/downstream hydrosolidarity; introduction. In: Towards upstream/downstream hydrosolidarity; proceedings of the SIWI/IWRA Seminar; Stockholm, 14 August, pp 11–15
Fleuret P (1985) The social organization of water control in the Taita Hills, Kenya. Am Ethnol 12(1):103–118
Grove A (1993) Water use by the Chagga on Kilimanjaro. Afr Aff 92:431–448
Gupta J, van der Zaag P (2006) Interbasin water transfers and integrated water resources management: where engineering, science and politics interlock. Paper presented at the EGU General Assembly, session “Hydrological Assessment and Integrated Water Resources Management with special focus on developing countries.” Vienna, 6 April
Hermans L, Hellegers P (2005) A “new economy” for water for food and ecosystems; synthesis report of E-forum results. FAO/Netherlands International Conference Water for Food and Ecosystems, The Hague 13 January. URL: http://www.fao.org/ag/wfe2005/
Hermans LM, van Halsema GE, Mahoo HF (2006) Building a mosaic of values to support local water resources management. Water Policy 8:415–434
ILA (1966) Helsinki rules on the uses of the waters of international rivers, adopted by the International Law Association at the 52nd conference, Helsinki, 20th August 1966. The International Law Association, London
Manzungu E (2002) More than a headcount: towards stakeholder representation in catchment management in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Phys Chem Earth 27:927–933
Manzungu E (2004) Water for all: improving water resource governance in Southern Africa. Gatekeeper Series no. 113. International Institute for Environment and Development IIED, London
Martin ED, Yoder R (1988) A comparative description of two farmer-managed irrigation systems in Nepal. Irrig Drain Syst 2(2):147–172
McCaffrey SC (1993) Water, politics and international law (Chapter 8). In: Gleick PH (ed) Water in crisis; guide to the world’s water resources. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Meissner R, Turton AR (2003) The hydrosocial contract theory and the Lesotho Highlands Water Project. Water Policy 5(2):115–126
Mohamed-Katerere J, van der Zaag P (2003) Untying the “Knot of Silence”; making water policy and law responsive to local normative systems. In: Hassan FA, Reuss M, Trottier J, Bernhardt C, Wolf AT, Mohamed-Katerere J, van der Zaag P (eds) History and future of shared water resources. IHP Technical Documents in Hydrology – PCCP series no. 6. UNESCO, Paris
Potkanski T, Adams WM (1998) Water scarcity, property regimes and irrigation management in Sonjo, Tanzania. J Dev Stud 34(4):86–116
SADC (2000) Protocol on shared watercourses in the Southern African Development Community (SADC). Signed in Windhoek on 7 August 2000. SADC, Gaborone
Sadoff CW, Grey D (2002) Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. Water Policy 4:389–403
Savenije HHG, van der Zaag P (2000) Conceptual framework for the management of shared river basins, with special reference to the SADC and EU. Water Policy 2(1–2):9–45
Sengo DJ, Kachapila A, van der Zaag P, Mul M, Nkomo S (2005) Valuing environmental water pulses into the Incomati estuary: key to achieving equitable and sustainable utilisation of transboundary waters. Phys Chem Earth 30:648–657
South Africa (1998) The national water act. Department of Water Affairs and Forestry, Pretoria
Subedi SP (2003) Resolution of international water disputes: challenges for the 21st century. In: Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed) Resolution of international water disputes. Kluwer Law International, The Hague, pp 33–47
Swatuk LA (2005) Political challenges to implementing IWRM in Southern Africa. Phys Chem Earth 30:872–880
Syme GJ, Nancarrow BE (2006) Achieving sustainability and fairness in water reform: a Western Australian Case Study. Water Int 31(1):23–30
Turton AR, Henwood R (eds) (2002) Hydropolitics in the developing world: a Southern African perspective. AWIRU. University of Pretoria, Pretoria
UN (1997) Convention on the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses. Adopted by the United Nationals General Assembly in resolution 51/229 of 21 May 1997. United Nations, New York
UNCED (1992) Rio declaration on environment and development. The final text of agreements negotiated by Governments at the UN Conference of Environment and Development, 3–14 June 1992, Rio de Janeiro
van der Zaag P (1999) Water allocation principles in catchment areas: some notes on constraints and opportunities. In: Manzungu E, Senzanje A, van der Zaag P (eds) Water for agriculture in Zimbabwe: policy and management options for the smallholder sector. University of Zimbabwe, Harare, pp 168–178
van der Zaag P (2005a) Water’s vulnerable value in Africa. In: IHP-HWRP, “The value of water – different approaches in transboundary water management.” Proceedings of the international workshop, Koblenz, 10–11 March 2005. IHP/HWRP – Berichte Heft 3. IHP-HWRP Sekretariat, Koblenz, pp 19–29
van der Zaag P (2005b) Integrated water resources management: relevant concept of irrelevant buzzword? A capacity building and research agenda for southern Africa. Phys Chem Earth 30:867–871
van der Zaag P, Carmo Vaz Á (2003) Sharing the Incomati waters: cooperation and competition in the balance. Water Policy 5:349–368
van der Zaag P, Seyam IM, Savenije HHG (2002) Towards measurable criteria for the equitable sharing of international water resources. Water Policy 4(1):19–32
van Wyk E, Breen CM, Roux DJ, Rogers KH, Sherwill T, van Wilgen BW (2006) The ecological reserve: towards a common understanding for river management in South Africa. Water SA 32(3):403–409
Wolf AT (1999) Criteria for equitable allocations: the heart of international water conflict. Nat Resour Forum 23(1999):3–30
Wouters P (1997) Present status of international water law. In: International water law; selected writings of Professor Charles B. Bourne. Kluwer Law International, London
WRMS (1999) Water resources management strategy. Ministry of Rural Resources and Water Development, Harare
Zimbabwe (1998) Water act (Chapter 20:24) no. 31/98. Government Printer, Harare, pp 459–531
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
van der Zaag, P. Asymmetry and Equity in Water Resources Management; Critical Institutional Issues for Southern Africa. Water Resour Manage 21, 1993–2004 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9124-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9124-1